Gingrich, Romney Go to a Tie; More See Obama as Competitive
Newt Gingrich has relinquished sole front-runner status almost as quickly as he gained it, landing at a dead heat with Mitt Romney in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll. And as the GOP hopefuls battle it out, ratings of Barack Obama’s prospects have warmed.
Americans now divide about evenly on whom they expect to win the 2012 presidential election: Forty-nine percent plump for the eventual Republican nominee, 46 percent for Obama. While still a weak showing given the usual advantages of incumbency, that’s a marked improvement for Obama from October, when 55 percent picked him to lose.
In general election match-ups, this poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds that Obama holds significant leads over Gingrich and Ron Paul alike; matched against Romney, though, it’s a dead heat, 47-47 percent, among registered voters. If Paul’s added to the race as an independent (he’s not saying), Obama moves ahead of Romney.
Much can change, of course, with the election still more than 10 months away. But as reported separately, Obama’s advance to a 49 percent job approval rating may put him back in the game.
GOP – More immediate is the GOP race, whose tumult continues unabated. Gingrich, the latest non-Romney to rush ahead, has 30 percent support for the nomination among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents. Romney has an identical 30 percent, matching his July high in ABC/Post polls this cycle. Ron Paul has 15 percent, with all others in the single digits.
Gingrich is up from 12 percent in an ABC/Post poll in early November, but he’d done better earlier this month, leading in some national polls as well as in an ABC/Post poll in Iowa, with its Jan. 3 caucuses. His rise followed earlier, unsustained moves for Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Herman Cain, as strongly conservative Republicans sought an alternative to Romney.
Indeed, Gingrich leads Romney by a 14-point margin, 36 percent to 22 percent, among ”veryconservatives.” It’s a serious challenge for Romney; while “very conservatives” make up just more than a quarter of all leaning Republicans nationally, they’re a motivated group who may constitute a greater share of the turnout at caucuses and primaries alike.
SATISFIED? – Romney takes strength from the perception he’s best able to beat Obama. Gingrich comes back on experience, and, perhaps surprisingly, with a broad advantage over Romney as better fit to command the armed forces. (Neither has military service.)
Gingrich, though, is not well-ranked on honesty and trustworthiness, and both Romney and Gingrich suffer from tepid ratings for saying what they really believe; just 51 and 52 percent, respectively, say this describes them. Bragging rights on that attribute belong to Paul – 65 percent believe they can rely on him to say what he really thinks.
Those soft ratings on forthrightness for the two leading candidates may be dampening overall satisfaction with the field. A less-than-ideal 59 percent of leaning Republicans say they’re satisfied with the GOP candidates, and a mere 11 percent are “very” satisfied. In late 2007, by contrast, 69 percent of leaning Republicans were satisfied with their choices – as were, on the other side, 81 percent of leaning Democrats, whose candidate ultimately won.
Notably, a broad 64 percent of potential Republican voters say there’s still a chance they could change their minds about which candidate to support – leaving vast room for further movement as the GOP race continues to unfold. And a Romney-Gingrich duel, if that’s how it develops, could be a long one. Asked which of these two comes closest to them on the issues, leaning Republicans divide almost exactly evenly, 46-45 percent.
That said, either Romney or Gingrich may suffice in the end: Each is the leading second choice among those who have a different first choice.
STRENGTHS and WEAKNESSES – Strong conservatives have an objection to Romney that’s policy-based, and as such may prove hard for him to move. Among all Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, 36 percent view Romney’s record on health care when he was governor of Massachusetts as a major reason to oppose him for the nomination. That’s trouble enough – but among very conservatives, it jumps to 55 percent.
Gingrich has his own vulnerability: Republicans by an 11-point margin, 44-33 percent, have an unfavorable impression of his work as a political consultant after he left elective office, with nearly a quarter undecided. Romney, by contrast, gets a favorable rating for his experience as a corporate buyout specialist, a point on which Gingrich has criticized him.
Romney and Gingrich alike clear other hurdles. Neither Romney’s Mormon faith, nor Gingrich’s three marriages, appear to be significant negatives to most potential GOP voters. Majorities believe both candidates have the personality and temperament to serve effectively as president (67 and 61 percent, respectively) and think they’d pursue policies most Americans would find acceptable (71 percent for Romney, 66 percent for Gingrich).
Paul falters badly on both those scores – just 37 percent in his own party think he’s got the temperament and character to serve effectively, and just 42 percent think his policies would prove acceptable to most of the public. As in Iowa, Paul also loses support for his isolationist views; 45 percent see his opposition to U.S. military intervention as a major negative.
ISSUES and ATTRIBUTES – Ranking across all the candidates, 43 percent of leaning Republicans pick Gingrich as having the best experience to be president, his best-rated personal attribute, with a 20-point advantage over Romney. More generally, 73 percent favorably rate Gingrich’s work as House speaker from 1995 to 1999.
Gingrich, as noted, also scores as best suited to serve as commander-in-chief of the military, selected by 35 percent, compared with 17 percent for Romney. On the other hand, 38 percent see Romney as best able to beat Obama; 28 percent pick Gingrich on this attribute.
Ratings on other attributes are more evenly spaced among the candidates. Romney and Gingrich are even on who best represents core Republican values, and essentially so on understanding “the problems of people like you.” While 22 percent pick Romney as the most honest and trustworthy, that slides to 13 percent for Gingrich. Even among his own supporters, just 37 percent see Gingrich as the most honest and trustworthy of the Republican candidates.
Differentiation on handling specific issues is not substantial. Romney’s got a 6-point advantage over Gingrich in being seen as best able to handle the economy, the critical issue to most potential voters; that occurs entirely among independents who lean toward the Republican Party. The two run essentially evenly on the deficit, immigration and health care.
In one final issue, Romney leads Gingrich, 26 percent to 15 percent, in trust to handle “social issues such as abortion and gay marriage.” And on this, Romney outpoints Gingrich even among very conservatives, 23 percent versus 12 percent – suggesting that Gingrich’s home in the hearts of strongly conservative leaned Republicans is far from a settled deal.
METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Dec. 15-18, 2011, among a random national sample of 1,005 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only respondents, and 395 leaned Republicans. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points for the full sample and 6 points for leaned Republicans. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt-SRBI of New York, N.Y.
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Imagine if polls were outlawed and people had to research each candidate and decide for themselves which candidate fits the “presidential mold”. Could America do it? Could we think for ourselves?
Posted by: ThePongster | December 20, 2011, 3:24 am 3:24 am
Only Ron Paul can defeat Obama. Gingrich? Are you serious? That guy will be laughed out of town if he makes it to the national election. Out of shape, old, womanizing and racist is no way to win these days.
Ron Paul – at least he has a chance…
Posted by: Hello | December 20, 2011, 3:34 am 3:34 am
What a joke this “poll”. I think the one who made this article still doesn’t know that Ron Paul is leading in Iowa.
People can’t be cotrolled anymore by fake or made-up polls.
Ron Paul all the way
Posted by: carlos | December 20, 2011, 5:51 am 5:51 am
Ron Paul all the way.
People dont believe in these fake or made-up polls anymore. We all know that Paul is the only one who can beat Obama because he is honest, intelligent and very different from the other candidates. He is the only one who can attrack the independent vote.
Posted by: carlos | December 20, 2011, 5:55 am 5:55 am
LOL! ….. Let’s see, being hypothetical here… What if I were also a Republi-minion? My choices are boiling down to:
(A) A vote for Romney? (LOL!…. “Mr. Flip-Flopper” and, as governor of MA, the closest thing to a liberal as one can get, i.e., “RomneyCare”)…
or…
(B) A vote for “Mr. Family Values” himself (LOL!), Gingrich…. Mr. “I Trade Wives Like Used Cars”.
(NOTE TO SELF: My wife would “beat my butt” if I voted for Gingrich!)
Well, with these two sad choices, I guess I’m going to have to vote for Obama again…. (hehehehehe!)
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | December 20, 2011, 7:58 am 7:58 am
I am not a big Gingrich fan but the medias obvious bias against him makes me wonder if I am wrong. What ever the media is for is suspect.
Posted by: karek40 | December 20, 2011, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Let’s see, hmmm. Three wives, multiple ethics violations, recent allegations of misuse of funds. Newt’s toast. Another one bites the dust.
Posted by: howdymo1 | December 20, 2011, 8:14 am 8:14 am
LIES….DONT BELIEVE WHAT ABC IS TELLING YOU ITS A LIE….I SAW THE IOWA POLLS AND PAUL IS IN A COMMANDING LEAD!!!! THAT ABC AND THE MEDIA ARE ALLOWED TO DO THIS IS INCREDIBLE…BUT THEN YOU MUST ALL UNDERSTAND THAT ANYTHING ELSE THEY TELL YOU IS ALSO GOING TO BE SUSPECT….THE END RESULT IS THAT THE UNITED STATES MASS MEDIA…HAS BECOME IRRELEVANT!!!!! THERE IS NOTHING THEY SAY THAT CAN BE ACCEPTED AS TRUTH FROM THIS POINT ON!!!! IF THEY CAN ATTEMPT TO MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ON THE LEADING PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT FOREIGN DOLE OUTS TO STOP, THEN THEY ARE NOT TRUSTWORTHY FOR ANYTHING AT ALL…THEY HAVE NO MEANING AND ARE NOTHING BUT PURE ENTERTAINMENT IF ANYTHING AT ALL. JOURNALISM IS DEAD IN THE UNITED STATES.
Posted by: thecapnhowdy | December 20, 2011, 8:29 am 8:29 am
A tie??? really???? Gingrich is a crook and thief and liar in EVERY thing he has EVER done. work. home. family. EVERYTHING!! Did you hear how he JUST charged his campaign (in other words, contributor’s money) tens of thousands of dollars for his OWN mailing list, for HIMSELF?????? IN other words, STEALING money from people who contribute to his campaign. I mean, this guy is a snake oil salesman and you’d dare put him in the same category as a great family man, honest man, who has done well and been honest in everything he’s done????? I mean, I know republicans are bigots, but really????? how can you even put Newt in the same stratosphere as a good to the core man like Romney???? I am 100% behind Mitt. But you put up Gingrich and not only will i NOT vote for him, I will ACTIVELY recruit to re-elect Obama! I would be THAT disgusted with the GOP.
Posted by: Johnny boy | December 20, 2011, 9:16 am 9:16 am
recent allegations of misuse of funds–and that was so shocking, huh? whoda thunk it?????? LOL!
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 20, 2011, 9:16 am 9:16 am
I fear that either of them may still beat Obama badly. Above, Georgie Bushie, why are you still complimenting Republicans by calling them Forrest Gump? Doesn’t make any sense at all, unless you have switched sides.
Posted by: Searambler | December 20, 2011, 9:26 am 9:26 am
And once again, an MSM poll VASTLY, WILDLY, AMAZINGLY oversamples Democrats and Independents and undersamples Republicans.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Bill Mitchell | December 20, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Yes, both of these candidates are far superior to the ongoing hell known as the Obama administration. This is what you get when you elect a community organizer on the vapid and vague platitudes of HOPE and CHANGE. LOL, indeed. And even more funnies…So Republicans are like Forrest Gump? You mean they are smart and wise, and only appear slow and dumb to shallow people? Then, thanks. Next you’ll be saying Republicans are weak, like…duh…Alexander the Great. It appears that many dems are not too bright.
Posted by: Risky Business | December 20, 2011, 9:35 am 9:35 am
AGAIN. A DECEIVING PIECE TO FOOL THE SHEEPLE. RON PAUL IS CLEARLY IN THE LEAD IN IOWA.
Posted by: RPNV | December 20, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Polls like this are really, truly meaningless. Over the last few months, there have been six different “front runners” for the Republican nomination. The only “poll” that counts is the actual primary. The rest is simply fodder for the news organizations, used to fill their 24 hour “news” programs………..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | December 20, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am
AMAZING that “very conservative” voters would entertain Gingrich.
Newt voted for:
* BAILOUTS
* NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND
* MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG ENTITLEMENTS
* CAP & TRADE
* TARP
& supported healthcare mandates with Pelosi.
The man has NO principles, NO conscience, and has used his office to enrich himself. Ethics violations abound.
WHY DOES ANYONE BELIEVE THIS DRIVEL FROM THE MEDIA THAT NEWT IS A “CONSERVATIVE?”
Posted by: Alan C | December 20, 2011, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Pres. Obama will be re-elected. I’m tired of the GOP’s constantly bashing of him but then they put up candidates who are crooked, have no good ideas and have many skeletons in their past. This is the cream of the crop for the GOP/tea party? God help us all.
Obama 2012.
p.s. Perhaps if we voted out all of Congress, took away perks, high salaries and had term limits, we would be far better off!
Posted by: Barb | December 20, 2011, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
However, gotta disagree Barb, since Obama stands a very great chance of being defeated, unfortunately. He’s lost lots of Independents, and his base won’t be nearly as energized, depsite the impression one may falsely gather from these comments sections.
Posted by: Searamblerone | December 20, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Newt is simply unelectable. He’s so out-of-touch with typical Americans and their families, that he’s in an alternate reality. Remember when he said (yes, he did) that children whose families were having economic problems and “couldn’t afford them” should be placed in “orphanages”??? He then went on to reference the movie “Boys Town”, made in the ’30′s with Micky Rooney! That’s what he sees as an ideal America. He’s pathological and dangerous.
Posted by: Dr. Bubba | December 20, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
If I’m not given a chance to vote for Ron Paul, I’ll hold my nose and vote for Obama!
Posted by: blind spot | December 20, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
‘We just need a Rhodes scholar back in the oval office.
Like him or not?. He does’nt sit around scratching his head.
We need Bill Clinton back, or we are all as ignorant as toads.
(Teddy tried on the ‘Bull-Moose ticket?, Bill could win on ANY ticket, …’millionaires, watch out’)
Posted by: Alex C. Smith | December 20, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Newt is a LIAR, A CHEATER, AND AN ALL-AROUND SLEAZE-BALL. I knew that once the public got wind of his background and his lousy character, they would get turned off and his numbers would tank. I support Romney. He not only has real world experience and consistant success at turning-around troubled organizations, but he also has a good character…. no cheating, high ethics.
Posted by: Karen TW | December 20, 2011, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Yes,Newt is all of those things,because Democrats say so.Then,they would see us re elect a man we know less about,that has time and again shown utter disregard,actual disdain for Americans best interest over his own agenda?That is proven.What about the “recent allegations of voter fraud concerning his beloved ACORN,and the Democratic party?Id take Daffy duck over Obama,but Newt actually sounds pretty good,especially with his take on radical judges.Id rather see an oversight comittee made up of randomly chosen citizens,than congress,but he’s on the right track.
Posted by: KalashnikovDude | December 21, 2011, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Ron Paul is the only candidate who predicted and warned against the economic crisis, who understood and explained the reasons for it, and who offers a viable solution.
Ron Paul is the only candidate who really means it when he says he wants to bring our troops home and scale down our unsustainable and unreasonable empire.
Ron Paul is the only candidate who is serious about slashing spending and eliminating taxes.
Vote RON PAUL 2012!
Posted by: Evgenia | December 27, 2011, 12:33 am 12:33 am