Giuliani Brings His Knife to Morning Shows to Carve Up Romney
Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani has some thoughts on the GOP field, and he generously shared them with cable news audiences this morning in appearances so sharp they could be used in anti-Romney ads.
“It may be that Newt is appealing to something that…Mitt isn’t appealing to,” Giuliani said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “There’s something wrong when you’ve been running as long as Mitt has and you’re at 25%…Seventy-five percent of the other Republicans are telling you something about him…I think it’s deeper than just a) ‘he’s kind of staid’ and everything else.
“I ran against him in ’07, ’08, I have never seen a guy – and I’ve run in a lot of elections, supported a lot of people, opposed them – never seen a guy change his positions on so many things, so fast, on a dime,” said Giuliani, known for having a fairly good memory when it comes to grudges and slights. On Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” Giuliani criticized Romney for being “so darn negative. I was really offended by his comment that Newt Gingrich is ‘zany.’ That isn’t the kind of language that should be coming from a candidate and it reminds me of what Mitt did in ’08, where he attacked me, he attacked McCain, he attacked Huckabee. Whoever was out front Mitt would attack. Sometimes personal attacks. Sometimes these ads about, you know, family and all this other stuff. So I think this could be hurting him. This is after all a Republican primary and they don’t want to see a Republican savaging another Republican…”
The criticisms coming from Romney’s surrogates also offend Giuliani. “Mitt’s got Governor Sununu out there, he’s got this one, and that one basically saying that Newt just doesn’t have the right ideas but …trying to create the impression that he’s crazy, zany, crazy.”
Perhaps, most damagingly, Giuliani said that Romney’s flip-flopping would make him easy pickings for President Obama.
“Pro-choice/pro-life. Pro-choice because somebody, a close friend, died and he became pro-choice because this woman died from an abortion. Then he figures out there are embryos and changes,” Giuliani told MSNBC. “He was pro-gun control. Fine. Then he becomes a lifetime member of the NRA. He was pro-cap and trade. Now he’s against cap and trade. He was pro-mandate for the whole country, then he becomes anti-mandate and takes that page out of his book, and republishes the book. And I can go on and on. ..Now what will Barack Obama do to that? What Barack Obama will do to that is: ‘This is a man without a core, this is a man without substance, this is a man that will say anything to become president of the United States.’ I think that is a great vulnerability.”
And what about Newt?
Giuliani acknowledged that Gingrich had some issues with changing his position as well. But “nothing like” the changes from Governor Romney to presidential candidate Romney. Gingrich “has a much more consistent position as a conservative, with some real exceptions, like Ronald Reagan had.” Giuliani cited positions Reagan as governor had taken in favor of abortion rights and tax increases.
The former Mayor said Gingrich was better able to get the “Reagan Democrats” because “Newt knows how to talk to them….I feel more comfortable campaigning for him in the suburbs…and selling him in the suburbs, to Reagan Democrats, than I do Mitt Romney.”
-Jake Tapper and Mary Bruce

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Romney called Gingrich “Zany”… If “Zany” offends Giuliani, maybe it’s a good thing he didn’t become POTUS.
Posted by: Ben-Jammin | December 15, 2011, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Sounds like Giuliani is Newt’s whipping boy so Newt can pretend he’s not going negative. I guess Rudy doesn’t need to check his facts anymore since he’s not running for president. The lies he’s telling about Romney are some real doosies. Taking a page out of Rick Perry’s “crazy” book.
Posted by: tjy | December 15, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am
TJY…Im not a Guliani fan, or a gingrich fan, but Mayor Guliani didnt tell ONE SINGLE LIE about Mitt Romney
Posted by: JV | December 15, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Uh, Rudy…..you never enjoyed having one-quarter of the republican electorate unshakeably in your corner. You wish you could have that. Everyone in the race does. Romney’s support doesn’t decline. He’s the real tortoise in the race, not Newt.
Since you brought up 2008–where you ran a terrible campaign that can only be saved by explaining it as a sandbag job to allow McCain to reap all the liberal to left-leaning republican votes, which is exactly what happened–let’s talk about what you allege. In every election Romney has ran, he has started with an ad about his family. Why? Not to underscore that certain other of his opponents have had multiple families and multiple wives through their years, but because his family is his core. Not that hard to figure out, in fact it’s bindingly obvious.
Romney, who was the frontrunner for 2012 for about two years until Newt had a better poll or two here or there, was consistently attacked by everyone and their surrogates, in every debate, in web ads, in op-eds, by radio chat show hosts……and yet where were all the moaners defending him? Where were people like you, Rudo, out there complaining about people being negative about him? In fact, where was Romney? Did he ever complain? Nope. Comes with the territory and that’s that.
So, Rudy, you like to cry about Newt being attacked and you like to act like Romney’s less consdrvative, well, you’re less conservative than both, and you are less conservative than McCain, for that matter, so who knows why you think you should be declaring conservative readings on any of these guys.
On your claims of Romney’s flip-flops: the only person worse at flip-flops than Newt is John Kerry. And i”m tlaking about actual, true flip-flops, not the media and your use of the word to represent mere changes of opinion. A flip flop goes from point A to B and back again to A. Romney has never done that, but Newt has and many times. But let’s play by your definition of the term: Romney, as a governor and before that as a private citizen, was never in any role or seat of power that had anything to do with abortion vs pro-life. That is, until legiislation hit his desk about stem cell research as Gov of MA. What did he do? He sided with life and vetoed it. This marked his public action on the matter and he wrote so in an op-ed to the Boston Globe in 2005.
Banning assault weapons isn’t being anti-gun.
He was never for cap-and-trade. That’s you’re guy, Newton.
HE was never for the public option and never for an individual mandate for the entire nation. You know you’re lying about this one, bro….but your man Newt was for all that stuff since 1993 until at least March of this year, 2011.
Face it, it’s you who is flip flopping. Why? Well, you had a glowing comment featured on Romney’s first book…I suppose this means you’re flip-flopping on Mitt.
Posted by: Declan | December 15, 2011, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
really?
this guy isn’t even valid today.
he couldn’t get his own party to support him so why would anyone waste time on his opinion?
’nuff said about this loser.
Posted by: hemnebob | December 15, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Arguing over who flip flopped more between Newt and Romney is like arguing whats blacker the kettle or the pot?
Posted by: Mike | December 15, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Not God’s gift to comedy, are ya Mike?
Posted by: Not Mike | December 15, 2011, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm