Mitt Happens: Gingrich Camp Says Personal Attacks Will Backfire
To some observers, Mitt Romney’s new ad, aimed at Iowa Republicans, seems to be saying, “Yes, I’m Mormon. But at least I’m not a philanderer. Like Newt.”
As such, it carries considerable risks. Not only by reminding conservative evangelicals that he belongs to a religion many do not approve of, but also by taking on Gingrich – subtly, perhaps, but unmistakably -on his three marriages and past person indiscretions.
One Gingrich adviser told ABC News that the ad “is basically Romney saying ‘My family is better than your family.’ It’s going to backfire.”
The Gingrich adviser says that as long as Gingrich is honest about his past failings, voters will focus more on candidate attributes dealing with leadership and the economy. Around 50%of American marriages end in divorce, the adviser pointed out.
But the issue could have resonance with the Iowa conservative base, because Gingrich has not just a failed couple marriages under his belt; there are and have been myriad allegations of behavior that these voters would view as immoral.
Romney earned the enmity of many of his fellow GOP candidates during his 2008 run for his sharp attacks on his rivals. Throughout these last few months, he has generally held his fire as he enjoyed his frontrunner status, but with this new challenge from Gingrich has come a new sharply aggressive approach from Camp Romney in Boston.
In yet another Romney attack – this one a far more direct fire – the Romney campaign this morning will hold a conference call in which former New Hampshire Governor John Sununu will attack Gingrich as unreliable and untrustworthy.
Gingrich and his campaign seem to be eagerly awaiting this attack. “Sununu doesn’t like Gingrich because Newt wouldn’t go along with his deal to raise taxes in the 1990 budget deal,” a Gingrich adviser tells ABC News.
Indeed, when Sununu was White House chief of staff for President George H.W. Bush, he now claims he thought Gingrich had agreed to the deal and reneged. Gingrich denies that account, but more to the point, this gives Gingrich an opportunity to remind Republican voters that he rebelled against Bush Sr.’s budget deal, which included tax increases.
Gingrich advisers say the question today becomes: “Did Mitt Romney support raising taxes in the 1990 budget deal?”
Throw me into the Sununu Briar Patch, they say.
-Jake Tapper

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Governor Romney should remind the voters about the House Ethics Committee charges that were brought against Speaker Gingrich, the fact that the Speaker admitted to falsehoods being made under his signature, and the fact that the Speaker was assessed a very costly fine. These are facts and there are no acceptable ways to get around them.
Posted by: savethemiddleclass | December 8, 2011, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Ultimately,the insinuations won’t backfire, because they’re true. Once all of the U.S. knows that Newt abandoned his wife while she was being treated for cancer and that the local church had to step up and take up collections to help support her and her kids, he’ll be toast. The guys is a narcissitic sociopath. What is well known in Georgia will eventually get out to the rest of the nation.
Posted by: Bobbie | December 8, 2011, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Wow – calling Newt a philanderer. Good one Mitt. But – I don’t think it’s gonna help you except among the extreme right wingers who consider themselves above the rest of us. Mitt – you haven’t got a chance in hell. You’re just another professional politician who, is, among other things, just another person in the 1% who has no idea of what middle and lower class Americans have been going through for the last 3 years. You can return to your million dollar home and live it up while ordinary Americans and returning troops get evicted by the banks you support.
Posted by: Bob | December 8, 2011, 8:15 am 8:15 am
It probably won’t do any good to try to explain to non-evangelicals or Mormons for that matter the problem evangelicals have with Mormonism. Mormons believe their works are what get them into heaven. To put it plainly they earn the right to be with God. A Christian believes God only offers this as a gift to all mankind and that works are done because of their love for God. These positions are opposites therefore both can’t be right.
Posted by: karek40 | December 8, 2011, 8:16 am 8:16 am
I think the American people are more interested in a president who can help solve our problems than the outcome of a 20 year old politically motivated witch hunt. Just sayin’…
Posted by: Jasonn | December 8, 2011, 8:29 am 8:29 am
How interesting. Newt is the king of personal attacks.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | December 8, 2011, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Karek40: Mormons do NOT believe that it is their works that will get them into heaven. Here is a quote pulled from their own website: “But what do we mean when we say He is the Savior of the world? The Redeemer? Each of these titles point to the truth that Jesus Christ is the only way by which we can return to live with our Heavenly Father. Jesus suffered and was crucified for the sins of the world, giving each of God’s children the gift of repentance and forgiveness. Only by His mercy and grace can anyone be saved.” Evangelical Christians also did not want to believe that John Kennedy’s faith was genuine, because he was a Catholic. In my opinion, evangelicals should evaluate whether or not someone is walking the walk as opposed to talking the talk. The Pharisees talked the talk, yet Jesus condemned them. The book of James states that faith without works is dead. The fruits of Gingrich’s life tell me a great deal.
Posted by: savethemiddleclass | December 8, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am
“I believe that marriage is between a man and woman,” Newt told a crowd at Fort Dodge in Iowa in September. “It has been for all of recorded history.”
Actually, he believes marriage should be between a man and a series of women. You know, that whole ‘sanctity of marriage’ argument. This is why Newt’s gay half-sister is campaigning for Obama. If you can’t count on your own family to support you, why the hell should anyone else?
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am
“The Gingrich adviser says that as long as Gingrich is honest about his past failings…” Define honest, Newt. Your honest or the rest of the known universe’s honest? Like most men with fidelity failures in their past, you choose to tweak the story to fit your definition of honesty.
Posted by: Bob | December 8, 2011, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Newt: What happens at night comes out in the light. Next time you decide to attack someone for their questionable actions, you need to be sure your own hands are clean. You did that once and now you are on the receiving end. You did it and you can’t deny it so take it like a real man. You earned everything you’re going to get. As far as Romneys Mormonism, I believe in God but I don’t believe in organized religion of any kind. The reason is that in recent times it seems to have become a extremely lucrative tax exempt business. These religions own shopping malls and grocery stores and don’t pay taxes. People, you can’t buy your way into heaven. You earn it.
Posted by: howdymo1 | December 8, 2011, 8:39 am 8:39 am
“…Around 50%of American marriages end in divorce, the adviser pointed out.”
Mmph! That was nasty! Clearly a subtle jab at the public of; “he who lives in a glass should throw no stones.” Although this is a true fact those who enter into marriage are not looking to divorce. It happens. No one knows what goes on behind closed doors, and while I don’t think it cavalier to leave a spouse who is dealing with a deathly disease, we don’t know what the stress levels etc are. However, that second marriage is the one I have an issue with and his having an affair with his future third wife. Gingrich’s attack of Clinton was relentless while he was in a sense doing the same thing. Yep! The base argument about President Clinton was that he lied under oath… and he did, the subject matter was something that did not need to be broached in the first place. That was an issue between Clinton and his wife. This only makes the Cain’s lawyer statement even more amazing; “…a matter between two consenting adults that blah-blah-blah” LOL!!! If Conservatives, Republicans… whatever you are calling yourselves these days, were SO appalled by Clinton’s actions and those of Herman Cain’s, there is no way that you can dismiss those of Newt Gingrich. …and we haven’t even addressed the ethics violations yet!
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 8:54 am 8:54 am
The salamander thinks being honest about his past failings will help? There’s not enough time before the election to go over them all. Putting anyone remotely connected with either Bush back in the White House is a big mistake…maybe the last mistake the United States as we know it will make.
Posted by: Arf40 | December 8, 2011, 8:54 am 8:54 am
h
Posted by: carolyn | December 8, 2011, 9:04 am 9:04 am
I hope Obama can still win despite his poor performance so far, and he better be careful since he has some still to be revealed skeletons in his closet.
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Is Gingrich’s popularity a fundamental capitulation that Republicans are seeing how hopeless things are on the presidential front? Are the polls telling them that voters now see them in such poor light that they figure Gingrich is the best flaming wad of political mayhem they can muster in the face of certain defeat? Obviously they see Romney as a dud on leadership against health care. Maybe the lobbyist Gingrich can influence Congressional elections enough to gain enough corporate sponsored pledgebot seats to kill the health care bill that way. They know that if health care flies it will be so enormously popular that they’ll be out for 50 years, so this is a critical strategic juncture for them. It’s obviously not about the deficit, they had a deal on that but torched it, probably because it would have enabled health care to fly. Health care is the bottom line in all of this. All leadership decisions are revolving around the fear of the success of the health care bill.
Posted by: sameagain | December 8, 2011, 9:16 am 9:16 am
“I hope Obama can still win despite his poor performance so far, and he better be careful since he has some still to be revealed skeletons in his closet.”
Posted by: Searambler
Excellent points, my old friend. Best regards, and congrats on your new Hoveround.
Posted by: LexingtonLady | December 8, 2011, 9:21 am 9:21 am
“I hope Obama can still win despite his poor performance so far, and he better be careful since he has some still to be revealed skeletons in his closet. Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 9:14 am 9:14 am ”
OBVIOUSLY NOT A SEARAMBLER posting. ABCNews editors please!!!! For me, doing this type of shenanigan shows sheer desperation and a willingness to even cheat. It does not reflect well upon the Right-Less.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 9:29 am 9:29 am
You know you’ve got the moral compass of a sewer rat if simply states facts of truth about you is consider an ‘attack”
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Mormons believe their works are what get them into heaven. —oh please! So do Evangelicals! What do you think this whole attack on choice for women is about!! You think they do it because they love children, yet then vote against giving children of the poor heatlhcare????? LOL! Oh please! It is ALL about getting a go-to-heaven-free-card for the Evangelicals! Suck up! Believe! Then you get to heaven! You people dont do good deeds at all! You make calculated investments that you think will bring you special favor later! HYPOCRITS! Beware, my friend, the one group Jesus could NOT STAND were the hypocrits.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I want to see Newt in a debate with Obama. I just want to see Newt STAND next to Obama. Big fat overindulgent overly proud windbag with cool thin, handsome Obama. Newt will lose 20% of the vote just by looking at him.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 9:36 am 9:36 am
“…if simply states facts of truth about you is consider an ‘attack””
(GrannyNosBest)
You mean like the facts that Obama is thoroughly corrupt and even more thoroughly inept?
Yeah, that inconvenient thing called Reality.
Posted by: Talk Is Cheap | December 8, 2011, 9:42 am 9:42 am
In a normal situation the President wouldn’t stand much of a chance with the economy in the shape it is. This is not a normal situation; he has to deal with the republicans in Congress whose only aim is to stop his re-election, not the economy.
FDR faced the same problem in 1936 in the height of the great depression; he was re-elected overwhelmingly because the American people were smart enough to see that he was the one fighting for them. The same will occur in 2012.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 8, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Gingrich can’t win; he has too much baggage. It amazes me that voters could re-elect Bill Clinton after his behavior outside the Oval Office but can’t vote for Romney, who apparently is a moral person with a wonderful family. Obama has been a dismal failure, Alibi Ike, and has not fulfilled his campaign promises–transparency is a joke, yet he will likely “talk” his way back into the White House.
Posted by: jonnie | December 8, 2011, 9:51 am 9:51 am
thoroughly inept——–Newt was a lobbyist for Fannie and Freddie. You want that guy, a lobbyist, an opportunist who has, repeatedly, done BADthings for the country so long HE PERSONALLY benefits monetarily?????? gee, didn’t we just have a president like that???? The type of guy who cheats on his wife while she has cancer. Asks her to sign divorce papers while she’s in the hospital recovering from surgery from cancer. There is such a small percentage of the people who know this stuff, but it is HARD FACT. Just wait until about 2 weeks before the election and juts let it rip. Fill the airwaves with FACTS of just the kind of guy Newt Gingrich is. Why would anyone trust him with anything? He has not done ONE THING where in the end, he was NOT found to be anything other than a cheat liar theif. How many ethics violations against him????? more than any other congressman. Highest fines EVER levied. He’s not only cheated on his wifes, he’s been CRUEL to them and then when he was essentially kicked out of politics, he goes back as a Lobbyist for F&F. lovely. there is not one thing in his resume that is NOT tainted by lies and moral misconduct. So……….go for it. I think actually, nobody need do anything. Let it coast, get a false sense of security and then, few weeks before the actual general election. …..let it rip with abandon and the beauty of it is, all you have to do is just state facts. dozens and dozens of facts and he looks, and smells, like the sewer rat he is.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Obama has been a dismal failure—there’s really no factual basis in that statement. It’s just……whining. When Obama took office we had the stock market at half it’s value, the largest 6 banks in the country on the verge of failure taking 60% of the GDP with it, it is what it is. The question is, how good could the economy possibly be after such a thing????? The ‘oh this is so terrible’ is just disconnected from the reality of, how much could any president improve an economic crises and given the alternative of what it would be like if republicans had gotten their way and NOT saved the banks ,where would we be now, which clearly now we know, would have been in a depression with about 25 – 30% unemployment. Pretty much everyone excep the right wingnuts know that. This ‘he’s so terrible’ doesn’t resonate with 80% of hte voters in this country. THey are just wondering who is better for us NOW! Poll after poll after poll shows folks do not blame Obama for where we are. His favorability rating, his personal likability, is huge. He is far more popular than congress, than Newt, than Mitt, than anyone. If you attack him personally, you onlyget him more support, as the meeting of republican strategists proved when they polled to find out, oh crap, folks really like the president. Even if they wonder who is best for the economy in the future. The republicans have one choice. Mitt Romney. he’s likable, he’s smart, he could probably do a good job and has agood resume. Newt will implode. If they’re smart, theyll just let him get the nomination, let him go right up until the end and then slam him and not leave him enough time to respond. It wil lbe easy as pie. the next president will be Obama or Mitt. IF you put up Mitt, he has a chance to win. If you put up Newt, it’s going to be a landslide for Obama. Some women in the office didn’t know about the blow job in the car thing. They were horrified. Turned them around in a nanosecond. Bringing down Newt will be EASY. The only question is the timing when you do it. After Mitt is gone is probably what the democrats are thinking.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am
GrannyNosBest, lol. You seem like real hysterically hyped up. And quite ineffectively wordy. Thanks for the laughs. Stumble on.
Posted by: Jack Spratt | December 8, 2011, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Gingrich is arrogant.. and stupid. It’s a fun combination. He says not just stupid things, but REALLY stupid things and then ends them with “i’m too intellectual. I think too much”. Ok. right there, the fact that he would say that, on record, that we have the video shows that he is NOT smart. A smart man doesn’t say that in public. He says Spanish is a ghetto language. Let’s replay that tape all over florida. I agree with the posters that taking him down, by simply who he is, just getting out the images of who he really is, is just like taking candy from a really fat spoiled bratty baby. Obama surged in the polls after his debate. You hate obama so much you are out of touch with reality. Fact is people like Obama. Personally, he is very well liked and personally, The only person who has higher UNfavorability ratings than Newt, is Palin.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Jack Spratt, your bias has really skewed your perception. Obama is good looking to most people, while Gingrich is not. Obama is well-liked on a personal level whereas Gingrich is not. In fact, Gingrich was detested by the right wing until very recently. He’s a lobbyist. The ultimate insider.And most Americans realize that he isn’t trustworthy. He sells out to the highest bidder and flip flops even more than Romney.
Palin’s the one! Oops, not running. No, Bachmann’s the one! Oops, she actually believes the crazy stuff our base says. Perry is our savior! Oops, he’s not either. Ron Paul! Oh wait, he’s actually consistent, but we don’t like where our rhetoric takes us if we’re consistent. Herman Cain!!! Oops. Okay, Newt!!! Who cares if we can’t trust him and he’s an ethically-challenged career politician!!
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular. Seriously.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 8, 2011, 10:07 am 10:07 am
GrannyNosBest, lol. You seem—–blah blah blah. When you can’t argue the point, you attack the messenger. yeah. My toddler grandson does that. Not a terribly original tactic. Have fun with your fat boy. I like Obama. It’s works for me. You’re dumb as a stone to not support Mitt. He was my governor and did a stellar job, even though I tend not to care for republicans, I must admit when a man does a good job, no matter his party. Newt is a sewer rat. And you’re on his side. It must feel pretty slimy to be in your skin. good day.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Obama is not just “thin”, he is scrawny—-you sound jealous of his abs.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Newt was a lobbyist for Fannie and Freddie.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am
And Obama demonized Wall Street WHILE allowing Fannie and Freddie execs bring home HUGE bonuses. In typical “protect the President we elected at all costs” the press didn’t report on it. Google it. It’s there.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 8, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“…IF you put up Mitt, he has a chance to win….”
I used to think that. In fact in the last election I was a Mitt supporter but then he lost the nomination to Mr. McCain. I was supporting Mr. McCain until he did the absolute unthinkable and chose BabyDoll, (OOOPS!!! So sorry… but I have not done that in months!), err.. Sarah Palin as his running mate. I have always felt that Romney was nothing more than Obama light but there is definitely a stark difference of which I can see now. Romney is willing to say anything to anybody in order to get elected. His opponents do have a valid point when they note that he has demonstrated that he has no core convictions. If he is indeed the Republican nominee this flaw will just come out again and again and again.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 10:16 am 10:16 am
“No wonder the GOP is so unpopular. Seriously.”
Posted by: Kimberly
I believe you misspelled Obama failrly badly, lol.
And his being “good-looking” is merely sycophantic media spin, whcih cuaght on with very dull and gullible folks. I know many more honest Democrats and Obama supporters who readily admit that Obama is mediocre looking at best, and perhaps even goofy looking and somewhat homely more realistically. But hey, if you believe he’s a hot number with those huge ears and twiggy body, then so be it. Uh GrannyNosBest, your posts are far too short and cryptic to be persusive. Not to mention nothing but partisan bs. LOL! And LMAO!
Posted by: Talk Is Cheap | December 8, 2011, 10:18 am 10:18 am
WHILE allowing Fannie and Freddie execs bring home HUGE bonuses—–we are all bound by contractual law. Obama didn’t write those contracts. Newt did. :-) Obama wasn’t the lobbyist. Newt was. Obama was trying to save the country from a Depression. Newt was lining his PERSONAL pockets by pushing for an agenda that was HARMFUL to the country. I dont expect you to understand. but the other 80% of hte population does. Again, I heard a political strategist say it best. Newt has a huge UNFavorability rating. People DO NOT LIKE HIM. they know him, and dont like him. Mitt isn’t known. The strategist said the uphill battle for Newt is trying to get people to change your mind about him, especially when all the left has to do is fill the airwaves with video of him, his own words. You can’t redefine yourself when YOU are all over the place. Hey. do what you want. I dont care. Newt will NEVER be president. promise. I’ve been around a long time, deary. I remember Barry Goldwater. Do it. Run your Newt. And then maybe you’ll learn to respect the opinion of your elders. Work to do. good day.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am
The TEddy R thing Obama is invoking is really smart. The law the supreme court struck down was a Teddy R law. I think he should take some Teddy R quotes because they apply perfectly now. Obama is a smart man. He’s going to win this again. Even if Mitt does get the nomination which I dont think he will. He will surely win easy against Gingrich, but I Think he could even possibly win against Mitt but the crazy right wing wont run Mitt. They’re going to run the most repulsive personality since Palin. cool. They should make Palin his VP. Have the perfect storm of repulsion on the ticket.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Obama is mediocre looking at best—jealous! jealous! jealous!
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:23 am 10:23 am
they note that he has demonstrated that he has no core convictions.—he has the most important core conviction, .when he get hired to do a job, he does it WELL based on the facts on the ground and the circumstances to which he has to do it. HE DOES AN EXCELLENT JOB AT EVERYTHING HE DOES. Period. stupid stupid stupid republicans.
What possible ‘convction’ does Gingrich have????????? name ONE! He’s a thief, liar, cheat, lobbyist, conceit, and dumb as a stone YET he thinks he’s GENIUS! Oh God, Are you people really this soft?
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | December 8, 2011, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Gingrich is arrogant.. and stupid. It’s a fun combination. He says not just stupid things, but REALLY stupid things and then ends them with “i’m too intellectual. I think too much”….. The only person who has higher UNfavorability ratings than Newt, is Palin.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Exactly! You have people in his party who worked closely with him explaining how erratic he is– really speaking out on what a bad idea nominating him is. On top of that he IS arrogant. My gosh, right wingers claim to be so ruffled by arrogance to the extent that they project it everywhere they see confidence and yet they like Newt, who truly is arrogant? Wow!! I know there are a lot of double standards and hypocrisy in politics but that one is truly baffling.
But, hey, if the GOP wants to make the same mistake they made with McCain, replacing McCain with someone more controversial and more likely to come off as an untrustworthy and arrogant timebomb , then who am I to stop them? Gingrich will be very easy to persuade people against– lots of right wingers will stay home or vote libertarian or third party. I don’t even think Tom Coburn or Peter King will vote for him! I encourage Republicans to start looking for their other options now. They have run out of choices in their lame field of candidates. The GOP has failed y’all.
No wonder the Republican party is so very unpopular. That’s without even looking at how wrong many of their stances are and the disastrous results some of their stances have created.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 8, 2011, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Marsha Marsha and Kimberly, please see good eye doctors immediately. Obama is not good looking, unless perhaps you have been away from men for a very long time. Anyway, see an eye doctor, and if that doesn’t clear it up, then it’s all in your head. :-)
Posted by: Janet M. | December 8, 2011, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Obama is not good looking,—yeah, who likes a man with chiseled abs, perfect teeth, a big wide smile, nice chiseled chin…………janet, you’re not women are you??? jealously jealousy!
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Mitt’s kind of hot, though. His sons are VERY good looking. They should go into politics. just sayin….
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:36 am 10:36 am
The new Newt has everyone talking. His huge hubris, lack of humility and hidden skeletons are gonna hover around for a while, until he starts licking the rotten tomatoes and eggs hurled at him, after the election. Somebody is gonna have to lick this portly person, called Gingrich, hollow and make him bite the dust. That will be the day.
Posted by: Marat | December 8, 2011, 10:36 am 10:36 am
yeah, who likes a man with chiseled abs, perfect teeth, a big wide smile, nice chiseled chin………——-you forgot the most important thing! Women LOVE a man who LOVES HIS WIFE and speaks adoringly of her!! We like to see a guy who is the type who, once committed, ADORES the women.
Posted by: Sandra D | December 8, 2011, 10:37 am 10:37 am
—-you forgot the most important thing! Women LOVE a man who LOVES HIS WIFE and speaks adoringly of her!! We like to see a guy who is the type who, once committed, ADORES the women.—hmmm. Now that you say it, you’re right and i think that is what helped Bush. For all the disgust people had at what a horrible job he did, there was always this sympathy for him that he was a ‘good guy’ and 90% of that was that we all liked Laura nad HE loved Laura. He was good to her, and we liked that. He got away with being, politically, a dirt bag because Laura was his love from year ago and he gave up drinking for her. That definitely earned him brownie points with the women. The divorce papers while she was recovering from surgery ..it’s true. I care about that MORE than I do the ethic violations in congress. More than being a lobbyist. I have work to do too. good day all.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | December 8, 2011, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Janet M.,
If that’s the best props you have for the highly unpopular GOP, I can see why they’re so unpopular. I note you have nothing at all to say on the likability factor and the fact that Newt is not well-liked on any level–lookswise, personalitywise, trustworthiness wise, etc.
Scott Brown, who all the GOP guys and gals were drooling over not so long ago, will likely lose to progressive heroine, Elizabeth Warren. At the moment she’s a good 7 points ahead of him in the polls. Focusing comments on looks really helped him out a lot, yeah?
lol.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 8, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am
The pundits keep referring to a poll that says 80% of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction the economy is going (dah, this is no revelation). They use this to make people think that the President is in political trouble. They never mention that 75% of that 80% blame Congress and the republicans.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 8, 2011, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Who cares what Obama looks like. He radiates smart. Smart is more sexy. You could always have Perry who can’t seem to tear himself away from the mirror long enough to answer simple questions. Newt has that sneer that reminds me of Cheney. I would like to hear what Huntsman has to say but none of these windbags will let him talk.
Posted by: howdymo1 | December 8, 2011, 10:52 am 10:52 am
“He radiates smart.” (howdymo1 |)
No, he radiates hollow arrogance and the worst sort of phony pseudo-intellectualism.
Posted by: Janet M | December 8, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Janet M, the projection is amusing in a sad, poor thing kind of way– particularly given I’ve made about five posts in the past month, total-,
More importantly, however, I note again you cannot deny that Newt Gingrich is not well liked, even within his own party.
In 1997, Newt Gingrich was the first speaker of the House, EVER, to be punished by the House for ethics violations. He is not trustworthy. He is known to be erratic and an arrogant, serial hypocrite who sells out to the highest bidder.
And yet he is what the failed GOP has to offer.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 8, 2011, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Elizabeth Warren. At the moment she’s a good 7 points ahead of him in the polls. —-well, he sold himself out to the big banks when he voted AGAINST , was instrumental in blocking, Glass-Stegal to be implemented once again while Warren was for it. And Mass residents seems to be…..logical. They voted for Mitt Romney even though they politically didn’t like things about him but thier state was a mess and they knew, logically, he was the best man for the job. Logic. the northeast runs on LOGIC. that’s why, they do things better. Fact. Their stats for EVERYTHING are better. Education, lowest divorce rate, lowest heart attrack rate, rated 2nd fittest state in the country, one of hte lowest teen pregnnacy rates. They actually are very pragmatic. They elected WIlliam Weld, another republicans, who …did a good job. They tend to do what works, forgoing politics. One thing you can say for the ladies of the northwest…while they may be prone to be more sympathetic to good looking man who loves his wife, you put that MAN up against a smart intelligent WOMEN, well, he’s got no chance. ;-) Scott Brown’s good looks can’t make up for the fact that he was just wrong and Warren was just right. Not where logic rules.
Posted by: Sandra D | December 8, 2011, 11:00 am 11:00 am
“Scott Brown, who all the GOP guys and gals were drooling over not so long ago, will likely lose to progressive heroine, Elizabeth Warren. At the moment she’s a good 7 points ahead of him in the polls. Focusing comments on looks really helped him out a lot, yeah? ”
That’s interesting. I don’t know how he is governing since he has been elected but I am finishing up his book right now. Yep! looks and likability does play a factor in getting elected (fortunately/unfortunately) but he REALLY had a tough life growing up and his accomplishments are amazing given his background. I would find it really hard to believe that he has governed so far to the hard right a la Herman Cain or Michele Bachmann for example given his background. I would think that he would be more of a moderate or moderate to conservative which I think is a good thing. I guess the people will speak regarding his job performance. As for his book–its a good read except he goes on and on and on about basketball!
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am
phony pseudo-intellectualism.—excuse me…WHO said “i’m too intellectual. I think too much.”…..LOL!!
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am
The sure sign of someone with NO intellect is the stupidity of saying, out loud, while the cameras rolls “Im too intellectual. I think too much”. Truly intelligent people have better things to muse over than self aggrandizing , and certainly, have the knowledge that even IF they were to have such narcissistic tendencies as pondering on how awesome they are they can hardly stand themselves, it’s probably best not to pronounce such arrogance to the world as a badge of honor. Newt is stupid man who thinks he’s smart. Yet talks enough to remove all doubt for everyone but him.
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | December 8, 2011, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Go away Mitt !!!! Go away Newt !!!!!!
Posted by: Alice Helton | December 8, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am
I would think that he would be more of a moderate or moderate to conservative —he’s simply self-serving, as most people who grow up poorish with hard lives and barely any parenting are. He blocked the reinstatement of Glass Stegal. Nearly single handedly. He did a few others VERY questionable things that literally, makes the economy ripe to have another meltdown and the reason is right there, downtown boston, on Federal street. He’s bought and paid for. He can drive that pickup all he wants, but Mass is not a place where you expect folks not to pay atttention to what you DID! The reason Mitt got elected is that folks looked PAST his republican rancor to his accomplishments and sure enough, I will give him that he did a good job. Brown has been not only unremarkable, he’s been….unethical. in his voting. he has been. He’ll lose. AS he should. Too bad. He was fun to look at.
Posted by: marsha marsha | December 8, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I agree with Searambler, Obama is hot. The big ears do disconcert me, as do Obama’s many gaffes when not using his teleprompter, but he’s still hot.
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | December 8, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am
obama looks like Jiminy Cricket. Lol.
I can’t believe these posts. ROFL.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 8, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am
I don’t care about the Mormons, I don’t care about the Catholics, I don’t care about the religious right, I don’t care if somebody has been divorced once or twice or ten times, I don’t care about politically motivated ethics committee chargers of which 99.99% were tossed out, I don’t care about politically motivated IRS audits that resulted in no findings, I don’t care if a guy is nice, or has good hair and wears a nice suit…just give me someone who will be get the country back to work, reduce the size of government substantially, balance the budget, repeal Obamacare, and reduce the deficit.
Posted by: Altomb | December 8, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Republicans complain and whine about government giveaways (except if hey’re for the rich) Newt says we all should pay more in health insurance to set up a charitable fund to pay for those that don’t. What does he think we have now? The man is just plain dumb.
A mandate saying that everyone should pay a little (dependent on income) for their health insurance is a common sense approach in the Affordable Health Care bill. It works in Massachusetts, although Romney cops out of it in order to appease the tea party.
So why are the republicans crying about? They can’t have it both ways, a lot of people paying nothing or a lot of people paying something. They whine and moan but never offer a solution to the health care mess we have today.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 8, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“Obama is good looking to most people, while Gingrich is not.” – Kimberly
Meaningless and not pertinent.
“Obama is well-liked on a personal level whereas Gingrich is not.” – Kimberly
More tripe that doesn’t matter.
“Seriously.” – Kimberly
Not.
“I can’t believe these posts. ROFL.” – ceeLeelee
Yeah the entertainment value is high here today.
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
“Now, good luck at band practice.”
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe
Uh, funny. Like…not. I don’t do “band” — I am strongly studying for my GED. So there.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | December 8, 2011, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Our humble apologies to Mr. Jiminy Cricket and all crickets everywhere.
We truly did not mean to offend. :(
Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 8, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
@Noz -
They have flipped their wigs!
Lol.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 8, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Posted by: Altomb | December 8, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I’d like to add to that Altomb,
“I don’t care about the Occupiers, I don’t care about Lady Goo Goo Ga Ga, I don’t care about the Loonie Liberal Left and their Religion of Pop Culture, I don’t care if somebody doesn’t know the real definition of Marriage, I don’t care about ears that are too big and stick out, I don’t care about living with a politically biased media , I don’t care if a gal is nice, or has good hair and wears a nice evening dress with a V split…just give me someone who will be get the country back to work, reduce the size of government substantially, balance the budget, repeal Obamacare, and reduce the deficit.”
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
” I am strongly studying for my GED. So there.” (Marsha)
Congratulations and best of luck. Sorry you had to quit school. Are you old enough to vote for Obama next year? And I have to say that it is wildly unfair and homophobic for people to be laughing at the gay men Dems who think Obama is hot. Just my 2 cents worth.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
…just give me someone who will be get the country back to work, reduce the size of government substantially, balance the budget, repeal Obamacare, and reduce the deficit.
POSTED BY: ALTOMB | DECEMBER 8, 2011, 11:34 AM 11:34 AM
There have been private sector jobs added every month for 21 months straight. The number of government jobs has been reduced every month for months. This president has put in place all of the pieces necessary to figure out the best way to balance the budget and reduce the deficit and nobody has ever been able to complete those tasks in the period immediately following a major economic crash. The sensible budgeting should have been done BEFORE the economic crash, instead of the Bush approach to borrow and spend.
Posted by: Ralph | December 8, 2011, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
What a pathetic lot of Republican candidates. And the Republicans in Congress are cut from the same cloth.
Posted by: Dan | December 8, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“Go away Mitt !!!! Go away Newt !!!!!!”
Posted by: Alice Helton
Come on, that’s just silly. Think it through better, and then get back to us.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Geez, bad karma today. Right after I comment on Alice’s silly post, two more lame posts immediately show up. Please Dan and Ralph, do us proud by producing something remotely resembling an original thought, instead of cut-and-paste pablum. Thanks.
POSTED BY: MYTAKEONTHIS61 | DECEMBER 8, 2011, 12:28 PM 12:28 PM
You might want to take a look at the intelligence level of your own posts. :)
Posted by: Jane | December 8, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
“You might want to take a look at the intelligence level of your own posts. :)”
Posted by: Jane
LOL, AND LOL AGAIN. Compared to your cryptic, meaningless contribution, my posts are Shakespeare.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
” . . . instead of the Bush approach to borrow and spend.” – Ralph
Didn’t you mean the Obama approach to borrow and spend?
Maybe you meant to say Barry, Bush Version 3.0
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
POSTED BY: MYTAKEONTHIS61 | DECEMBER 8, 2011, 12:42 PM 12:42 PM
Nothing “cryptic” or “meaningless” about it. In fact, it’s very direct and full of meaning. :)
Posted by: Jane | December 8, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
POSTED BY: NOZ | DECEMBER 8, 2011, 1:02 PM 1:02 PM
You missed the point. Bush was using the borrow and spend approach to the budget BEFORE the economic collapse. AFTER the economic collapse, there is far less choice because of the stresses placed on both revenues and resources.
Posted by: Ralph | December 8, 2011, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
“You missed the point.”
POSTED BY: RALPH
Just admit it Ralph, you have no real point, except for the one at the top of your head.
Posted by: JerseyBabe | December 8, 2011, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
OBVIOUSLY NOT A SEARAMBLER posting. ABCNews editors please!!!! For me, doing this type of shenanigan shows sheer desperation and a willingness to even cheat. It does not reflect well upon the Right-Less.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 9:29 am.
So true. I did not post that. The really pathetic thing is, the jackass troll that DID post under my screen name responded to his own post by posting under Lexington Lady’s screen name.
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“” I am strongly studying for my GED. So there.” (Marsha)
Congratulations and best of luck. Sorry you had to quit school. Are you old enough to vote for Obama next year? And I have to say that it is wildly unfair and homophobic for people to be laughing at the gay men Dems who think Obama is hot. Just my 2 cents worth. Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
and…
“Go away Mitt !!!! Go away Newt !!!!!!”
Posted by: Alice Helton
Come on, that’s just silly. Think it through better, and then get back to us. Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
AND…
“You might want to take a look at the intelligence level of your own posts. :)”
Posted by: Jane
LOL, AND LOL AGAIN. Compared to your cryptic, meaningless contribution, my posts are Shakespeare. Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm”
Once again… Not my postings! ABCNews Editors??? Maybe I should take this as a compliment–that my handle has such a large following of readers that “some” (or someone) feels a need to pose as me? I just returned to my offices from a client luncheon. I’ve been out of my office since 11:45 AM/EST
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | December 8, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
There have been private sector jobs added every month for 21 months straight. The number of government jobs has been reduced every month for months. Posted by: Ralph | December 8, 2011, 12:16 pm.
Ralph, you’ll only confuse the Republicans if you keep posting facts and reality. Better cut it out or they will attack you like a pack of rats………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Stop BSing, Searambler. You have pulled this childish crap several times before. I remember on one blog, you were fake posting for somebody named “Boris Spider” and several others also. Stop lying, and then having the gall to whine about your own asinine lies and games.
Posted by: Marcus | December 8, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
WHILE allowing Fannie and Freddie execs bring home HUGE bonuses—–we are all bound by contractual law. Obama didn’t write those contracts. Newt did. :-) Obama wasn’t the lobbyist. Newt was. Obama was trying to save the country from a Depression.
Posted by: GrannyNosBest | December 8, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am
2011 – Barack Obama’s has administration approved $13 million for the executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as “performance bonuses.”
The executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac deserve $13 million of bonuses, Obama’s own administration declared.
Yahoo 2011 – Why is Obama approving $12.8 million in bonuses to the Freddie and Fannie executives?
Obama on Fannie and Freddie bonuses:
Obama: “Well, look, first of all, I know both those guys. They’re very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth. That’s part of the free market system. I do think that the compensation packages that we’ve seen over the last decade at least have not matched up always to performance. I think that shareholders oftentimes have not had any significant say in the pay ”
I guess your new blame person is Newt instead of Bush. I don’t expect you to understand FACTS, but they are there. 2009 bonuses were also given. OBAMA and company O.K.’d the bonuses.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | December 8, 2011, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Do you all smell that? That’s the noxious odor of stale sooociliasm (“economic justice”, lol) wafting out of the White House.
Posted by: RowdyRodney | December 8, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Do you all smell that? That’s the noxious odor of stale marxism (“economic justice”, lol) wafting out of the White House.
Posted by: RowdyRodney | December 8, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
“AFTER the economic collapse, there is far less choice because of the stresses placed on both revenues and resources.” – Ralph
Exactly, since the Federal Government was taking in less money they needed to spend less. You are right, there was far less choice and yet Obama spent and wasted money.
Incredible!
There have been private sector jobs added every month for 21 months straight. The number of government jobs has been reduced every month for months. Posted by: Ralph | December 8, 2011, 12:16 pm.
Gee I didn’t know we were doing so well.
Happy Days are here!
Barry can run on his record.
This is great news!
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Marcus | December 8, 2011, 1:39 pm post ———- LOL! Screw you, you can’t prove a damn thing. I don’t stoop to the infantile level of the morons on the Right, regardless of what you THINK you remember…………..
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
You’re still lying a load of BS, Searambler — you know it and I know it, and sadly for you, many others know it. Stop fake posting under other people’s names, and then whining about it when someone “allegedly” returns the favor to you.
Posted by: Marcus | December 8, 2011, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
How fascinating that you had to leave out what I said “Seriously” about:
In fact, Gingrich was detested by the right wing until very recently. He’s a lobbyist. The ultimate insider.And most Americans realize that he isn’t trustworthy. He sells out to the highest bidder and flip flops even more than Romney.
Palin’s the one! Oops, not running. No, Bachmann’s the one! Oops, she actually believes the crazy stuff our base says. Perry is our savior! Oops, he’s not either. Ron Paul! Oh wait, he’s actually consistent, but we don’t like where our rhetoric takes us if we’re consistent. Herman Cain!!! Oops. Okay, Newt!!! Who cares if we can’t trust him and he’s an ethically-challenged career politician!!
No wonder the GOP is so unpopular. Seriously.
Perhaps because you know voting for Newt or any other Republican in the race is indefensible, and the GOP deserves the negative view Americans hold of it. People who have worked with Newt, people in his own party, have made it clear that he has a reputation for being unreliable and untrustworthy. Erratic, arrogant and impractical. Emotion and ego driven. Volatile.
Posted by: Kimberly | December 8, 2011, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Wow…. I mean, it’s one thing to disagree with a President, it’s another thing to just hate him with frothing anger. I mean, I didn’t like Bush as President, but I would never say that he was disgusting looking. He’s a good looking guy. Obama is actually handsome for of his age. And, he is in very good physical shape. Now, you might have a personal preference one way or another for this appearance or that appearance, but even if, for instance, you like a man with more meat on his bones….. a sane person cannot claim that Obama is “ugly.”
There can only be two explanations for people HATING Obama’s appearance so much: A) They either have trained their mind to hate him and everything about him (in which case, their opinions on the man are pretty much worthless…. or about as valuable as Fred Phelps’ opinion on Elton John.) Or, B) they are culturally incapable of recognizing non-white people as attractive.
I think A is the more accurate answer. It’s too bad. But I think that people like Limbaugh realized that Obama is good looking and well-spoken…. so they have to attack these qualities and brainwash people into HATING them. Orwell describes this process in 1984. Sad, but effective. And I think it is why Republican increasingly seem like they inhabit another universe…. every single election, they have to condition their followers to hate a new opponent, an aspect of common sense, a scientific idea, or a moral principle, etc. And, after so many elections, these people, who used to be quite friendly and congenial, like everyone else for the most part…. are increasingly pushed to hate new things until now they only agree with America 10% of the time.
Painted into a corner, Republicans have now started telling their followers: Look, the rest of America is totally alien to you! They are going to get you! Force you to believe that the planet is getting warmer, that religions should coexist peacefully, that the poor deserve our compassion and help! The government is going to brainwash you! Everyone is out to get you.
On the one hand, this isn’t entirely bad…. because over time, most Republicans will see through this, and migrate back to the normal world. (In fact, most of their children already have). But there is a dangers, especially when it is combined with violence and religious ideology. And that is what concerns me the most about the future. When you have 25% of the population believing that they are right and everyone else is wrong….. that every proof or argument made against them is a trick of the communists or the devil…. and that the only hope for their salvation is to retake America or die trying…. then you have something like we see in the Middle East.
Posted by: blip | December 9, 2011, 5:04 am 5:04 am
“No wonder the GOP is so unpopular. Seriously.”
LOL. Your cut-and-paste posts are funny, funny in a lame way. You just repeat the same expressions and phrases over and over, I guess in the silly hope that something will stick. BLIP, sorry but Obama is not hot — those ears are cartoonish, sorry but it’s true. Then, a reality check: the personal hatred for Bush from the left, and nasty personal comments about him, were far more in number and nastiness than those being tossed at Obama. So, you’re mistaken, or simply lying. Good luck with that, blip.
Posted by: JERSEYBABE | December 9, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am
MJ, you’re no babe. Who are you trying to kid? Ears are nothing compared to flat out bug ugly inside and out.
Talk about cut and paste posts….wah, your hate is justification for my hate which is justification for wah,wah,wah… good luck with THAT.
Posted by: Courtney's cousin | December 9, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I have to say that I was not a big fan of Newt Gingrich in the beginning but his maintaining a clean campaign and not resorting to ugly tactics being used by the other candidates is winning me over. We the people, have asked for innumerable years for a clean campaign and he is the first one to actually go in that direction. All the others should take note.
Posted by: Peggy | December 9, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
The reason Newt Gingrich is so popular, in spite of his lack of morals and controversial decisions, is because deservedly or not, he is credited for helping produce the budget surpluses and the longest period of economic growth in the USA in recent decades. His personal behavior is despicable, but his accompiishments offer hope to those affected by the economic, fiscal and unemployment problems we are experiencing. If nominated, he will do very well, not because President Obama is responsible for the problems we are having or because his policies have not been effective, but because he has been unable to connect with the average American and because he does not have the ability to inspire confidence and promote the level of investment and spending needed to stimulate the economy.
Posted by: Dominick | December 12, 2011, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Despite the shift in responsibility from the Congress to the President, he’s done a pretty good job. It’s not the Presidents duty to pass laws, he can only polk and prod. The republicans in the Congress have decided the continuation of this recession is to their advantage.
We avoided a great depression and the economy is growing although slower than anyone wants. The republican (tea party) controlled Congress has done nothing to help. Their only agenda is the defeat of this President and America be damned.
No President can make a significant difference with a party in Congress who wants to keep this recession going for political purposes. It doesn’t matter about whose in the majority or not. With today’s rules in the Senate and House, a small group can obstruct and delay legislation. If we want fixes, it will take both parties through compromise and common goals to get this country moving again.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 12, 2011, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Let me ask what no one else seems to be asking. I voted for Obama, my friends voted for Obama, my entire family voted for Obama. In all truthfulness, does anyone know of anyone that will be voting for Obama in 2012? I can count 2 out of what was hundreds unfortunately. The last election was specifically to punish Bush, Jr.’s leadership and the RNC. This upcoming general will be no different IMO.
Posted by: Liz Rocha | January 18, 2012, 10:47 am 10:47 am
NEWT FOR PRES!!!! WE NEED NEWT! Romney is too far away from the real issues and real people. Newt knows and will be there and take care of business. And he knows how government works as well as how business works. TRUST NEWT!!! He is our ONLY chance to fix this screwy country! Obama truly messed up The UNITED States of America. Obama has done nothing but tear OUR great country apart. Now we need to elect NEWT in 2012 so we can ALL work to put it back together!! VOTE FOR NEWT FOR A ONCE AGAIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!! I’m tired of being the world laughing stock!!! GO NEWT!!!!!
Posted by: Recwcca | January 23, 2012, 6:52 am 6:52 am