Ron Paul: Iran Does Not Threaten Our National Security

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
SIOUX CITY, IOWA: Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a preemptive strike on Iran because “they don’t threaten our national security.”
“If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that is their business,” he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building a nuclear weapon.
A recent IAEA report said that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb. And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran “about a year, perhaps a little less” before it could have a nuclear weapon.
Paul’s position on Iran is one that has drawn criticism from his GOP rivals.
On Friday, Paul was responding to a question from an Iowa voter who asked the Texas Congressman whether he could conceive of a situation where he would preemptively declare war on a country.
Paul admitted that the president does need the consent of Congress to declare war, but did say, “If battleships are off our shore, an imminent attack, the president has an obligation to respond.”
But in the case of Iran, Paul provoked his rivals and exclaimed, “they can’t even produce enough gasoline for their automobiles.”
With his bump in the polls, Paul’s GOP opponents, who see national defense as his weakness, have hit hard this week.
“Ron Paul thinks it would be fine if the Iranians obtained nuclear weapons,” Michele Bachmann said.
“You don’t have to vote for a candidate who will allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon to wipe Israel off the face of the earth,” echoed Rick Perry.
“One of the people running for president thinks it’s O.K. for Iran to have a nuclear weapon. I don’t,” said Mitt Romney.
Paul admitted on Friday that the criticism “baffles me a whole lot,” adding what is dangerous is endless wars and expanding government.
The Texas congressman rarely attacks his rivals at campaign stops, instead using campaign ads and interviews.
He told Bloomberg News on Friday that he might not be able to support any of his rivals because they embraced the status quo in Washington, admitting that his rivals don’t want to cut anything, audit the fed or bring significant change in government, and “that’s a problem for me,” Paul said.
Ron Paul placed second in support among Iowa voters in the latest NBC News-Marist University polls; he came in at 21%, with Romney at 23%.
Paul has drawn several hundred people at all three campaign stops today and has 500 college students canvassing for him in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Paul will be back on the campaign trail on Monday, stumping with son Rand as they make five campaign stops across Iowa.
In the meantime, the Texas congressman will be spending the weekend with his wife in Texas.
When asked by a reporter if that’s an indication that he’s feeling confident, a visibly smiling Paul looked up and replied, “I never talk in those terms.”

Email
White House Loves Aggressive Journalism ... Abroad
Virginia Ultrasound Bill Hits Nerve
Ron Paul is a dangerous man, he wants to follow the Constitution!
Posted by: blind spot | December 30, 2011, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Mitt Romney was OK with North Korea having nuclear weapons, but not Iran….go figure?
Posted by: bob | December 30, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
I understand with all the media and political attention given to Iran and its potential nuke program, to hear a serious contender say that it is not an issue for US national security sounds ridiculous. But if you really stop and try to use your brain to look at the world objectively, you will realize that there are many countries that have nukes, including Pakistan and North Korea and while this is not ideal, life goes on. There are many reasons some of the elite in this country want to take us to war with Iran (the main one being to make themselves even more powerful over the rest of us) but certainly the nuke thing is just an excuse they are looking for. Seriously, more and more countries are going to get nukes. Who’s to say who has the right and who doesn’t. The question is whether we can develop respectful, peaceful relationships with people we don’t approve of or at least maintain the bare minimum of diplomatic ties with them so that we can live in peace.
Posted by: Matt H. | December 30, 2011, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Here are a couple questions I wish I could ask Paul. Assume Iran manages to develop three nuclear weapons within the next three years. Assume the Iranians sincerely believe they could secretly give two of them away to terrorist groups. Do you believe that Iran would give one to Hezbollah or some other terrorist group to use against Israel. And do you believe Iran would give one to another terrorist group to use against us to for example sneak one into a port on a ship to explode in said port? The answer to those two questions would clearly show exactly how much he thinks Iran is or is not a threat to us.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 30, 2011, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Ron Paul needs to get that hole in his head fixed!
Posted by: Don | December 30, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
He also has this sick idea to respect The Bill of Rights!
Giving the power back to the people!
What an undemocratic thought!
Posted by: QUINTUS | December 30, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Iran has never ever attacked another country or started a war in its history ! Here is a educated man with knowledge. Lets not lose this opportunity in having a great leader. Vote Ron Paul , he tells you as it is not like others who tells you what you want to hear !
Posted by: Alex | December 30, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Ron, May God Bless you. You are most honest candidates among all the nincompoops in the political arena.
Posted by: MUNEER | December 30, 2011, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Who cares what Iran does? This is America! Lets stop trying to set Iranian policy, and set our own policy!
Posted by: Ken | December 30, 2011, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
All I can say is our gov’t has given al-Qaeda weapons and if that’s a so called terrorist group than why shouldn’t countries make the same claim about the USA. If you don’t believe me go look it up and see that the al qaeda flag is what it hanging in Libya. UK Daily Mail shows it “Flying Proudly over the birthplace of Libya’s revolution, the flag of al-qaeda.” It does lead me to question many things I’m told by myso called government, but I have no evidence of anything, I’m just very suspicious.
It might help you understand what’s really going on and how the war on terror is being used against Americans… Read section 1031 of the NDAA, look at what the TSA is doing at airports. There’s stories every week just about. We’re less safe with the TSA than we are without them. While it’s possible for Iran to someday become a threat, they have not invaded a country in over 300 years therefore I’m not overly concerned about Iran. In fact, out gov’t empowered them via the war in Iraq.
So it doesn’t make sense to me to threaten the American people with $5 or more gasoline because these so called political leads (whom are all bought up by Wall St. or some other special interest, besides Ron and Rand Paul and maybe a handful of others) when the history of Iran shows no threat to the USA. What’s their concern? The USA invading them and trust me, the war has already begun. If it hasn’t, we wouldn’t have been there and they never would have gotten our drone.
America will destruct from within if this stuff continues….. It’s only a matter of time and I’m afraid we might already be witnessing the slow destruction of our nation. It’s very sad for me to think there may be no future for our children and grandchildren given all the other stuff with the chemicals and GMO, etc. in our environment.
Posted by: Freedom Supporter | December 30, 2011, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Ron Paul is probably the most honest, level-headed Republican candidate that we’ve had in a long time. I think he’s the only one who truly cares about the average Joe and middle class America. If he ran against Obama, I’d have a hard time making a decision. If any other Republicans ran, I would not even think about voting for them for a second.
Posted by: Chris G | December 30, 2011, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Wake up folks, we are 15 trillion in the hole, and we just gifted the Iraqi’s a new country for themselves – it cost us well north of a trillion dollars. Afghanastan, Libya….all costly.
And now we want to nation build Iran too? Where will it stop?
You think Iran is a threat to national security, lets talk about the most pressing threat to national security – bankruptcy of the United States.
You won’t have many options when the Chinese cut the money off. We can’t borrow another trillion from the Chinese to launch the next war.
China is going to the moon again – we are broke. China is surging ahead with infrastructure – we are broke. China is building factory on factory – we are shutting ours down.
The next trillion dollar war – is going to break the camel’s back.
If you care about security, you’ll pass on fighting this war.
Posted by: RoboBobo | December 30, 2011, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
Those who are afraid of Paul’s foreign policy generally don’t know what his foreign policy is.
Posted by: ONe21 | December 30, 2011, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
“You don’t need to send American troops to
Israel, we defend ourselves.”
- Benjamin Netanyahu (Prime Minister of Israel)
I like how everyone brings up Israel, but never listens to her. They don’t need or want the USA interfering in her affairs. Google it. And while you are at it, question why Obama has pledged 30 billion dollars to Israel over the next decade.
Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: USA-1 | December 30, 2011, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Ron Paul has the most common sense when it comes to foreign policy and the potential for War. Think about the other candidates for a moment, they aren’t even in office, have no real facts or evidence, has not given or had any real debate, has not discussed going to war with congress, the people, etc, etc. and they are advocating War??? This is probably yet another attempt to try and discredit Ron Pauls common sense and smart approach to foreign policy.
I’m sorry, but I don’t want any President quick on trigger to send our troops to die. In addition, I want a President who will also consider the economic impact of long-term commitment.
Vote Ron Paul 2012 !!!
Posted by: True American | December 30, 2011, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Alex – poor boy – Iran fought Iraq and is fighting us in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Check you history – Persia/Iran has a history of war.
Further they have clearly stated their intentions.
The whole Paul mob is nuts.
Posted by: johnholladay | December 31, 2011, 12:01 am 12:01 am
I think this notion of going to war, and spending billions, and trillions of dollars we don’t have…. at INTEREST, is getting old. When we went to war with Iraq the first time, there was at least the INVASION of Kuwait that we could justify for our involvement (and OIL, but having the Kuwaiti’s Back was noble also).
9/11 was a good reason to “route out” terrorists in rogue nations, but not INVADE, and nation build. At least “routing out” the ones that could be still here, and working out from there, was a good plan. The Patriot Act was a “horrible” plan!! Invading Iraq was a horrible plan, Afghanistan is still a “horrible” plan. The Pentagon let Osama Bin Laden escape into Pakistan in the first place. They had him, but just let him slip on out. (assassinating him 10 years later had a broader purpose I suppose)
I’m with Ron Paul, if Iran was to develop a nuclear warhead, or two, they would be stupid to use it.
I think the U.S. needs to maybe consider using the DEFENSE budget for exactly that, DEFENSE. Build this Nation into a CASTLE, and close the open borders to ANY threat that the open borders pose, for our NATIONAL SECURITY.
Take all the “EXTRA” money saved from EMPIRE BUILDING, and use it to develop SUPER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY (that we don’t SHARE!!), and buld a MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM, that NOTHING can get THROUGH!! There problem solved. Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, China, can launch all at once, but each one is on a self destruct path before it even leaves the SILO, ship, or sub. Thats what you do with a NUCLEAR THREAT. What else are ya gonna do? Invade country after country, dropping bombs on civilians, and creating even more HATRED?? Going broke, and borrowing money, in the process?
Posted by: Torqued | December 31, 2011, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Why is the press blasting Ron Paul for making sense? You have to think the average say 45- year old person in both America and Iran, are probably thinking the same thing “Wait, why is that other Country mad at us?” Maybe, the Iranian’s are more aware, but last I checked they had the youngest population per a capita in the World. That’s youngsters listening to our music, wanting I-Phones, internet, and watching Hollywood movies and MTV.
These people don’t hate us. I am 34 years old myself, and I literally could care less if Iran has Nukes or not, just make sure they’re damn well not pointed at us. But that missel defense system is supposed to fix that any way. Right? People are tired of War. Their are children in this Country have never known an America at peace. Do you realize that? That’s freaking sad and pathetic!
Let’s pack up our toys, bring the troops home, and lick our own wounds here! We’re still strong, but not as strong as we should be, can be, and ought to be, economically, moral of the Country, jobs, and I don’t know if we’re going to have to fire the whole lot of both Houses of the Legislature or what…. But they better start damned well getting along, quit the political showmanship and theatrics, use some common sense, reach across the isle, use a good idea when it pops up (No matter who’s idea it was), act like a United American Country, give the population some good Government, good jobs, and let’s get the show on the road.
Look, what they do to Ron Paul, the ONLY Republican to make any sense, not be some radical far right cook you wouldn’t trust with a BB gun, let alone their finger on the Red Button that controls the United States Nuclear Arson and Military. Let’s nation build at home, let’s get ourselves Energy Independent using solar power and re-building our infrastructure. Let’s think 1950′s economics, minus the Macarthism Communist witch hunts, which is the Patriot Act and this crazy “War on Terrorism.” Same story, different decade. Same s**t, different toilet. Both are un-American and violate the Constitution the bed rock of this Nation and her beliefs.
So, Ron Paul is sane. Apparently that’s a crime in the new Republican Party, who keeps trying to Court the Tea Partiers. All 4,000 of them. Let it and them go. Meet in the middle. I’m telling you, you’ll hit America’s attitude and moral every time. Jobs, bring home the troops, let’s stop worrying so much about other Countries and start worrying more about our own. Just for a while. See here’s the thing, if we DON”T start worrying about our Country more, some one else will. We’ll wake up some day, and wonder how the hell did that happen? It will be because we did the thing all powerful Countries do right before they fail, they start worrying too much about what’s going on outside our own boarders and Country, meanwhile the next new up and coming power is paying our Country the attention we should have been doing, in order to figure out how to beat us.
Don’t blame me. Read history. It happens over and over and over. Let’s be different. Let’s be American. Let’s be justice, and right. That means only fighting when you have to, even if you can whip the smaller guy ten ways from Sunday. Handling your business, minding your own business at home, before some one or some other Country minds it for you. So, let’s go!
Posted by: joel | December 31, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Iran leadership would be stupid not to pursue nuclear weapons.
American leadership would be stupid to say the real reason for attack on Iran is her oil reserve
Posted by: ace | December 31, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Wow. This Independent is beginning to really like Ron Paul. And shame on Perry for capitulating to Israel. Maybe Ron Paul is just the kind of candidate Washington needs to shake things up….after all, most of us cannot stand the job Congress is doing now. Why not throw a wrench into the screwed up works that is our government?
Posted by: Ray | December 31, 2011, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Ron Paul is the best politician for majority of US population! but he needs to be moderated by seasoned person with international political experience.
Posted by: ace | December 31, 2011, 12:05 am 12:05 am
The amount of antiwar thinking americans in this country vastly outnumber prowar thinking americans.
Quit calling paul and his supporters nuts. Youre sitting in a corner by yourself rocking back and forth and calling the rest of the room “nuts”. You look ridiculous.
Iran isn’t a threat. Paul’s right.
He has my vote.
Posted by: nathaniel h | December 31, 2011, 12:10 am 12:10 am
So Paul says, “Iran does not pose a threat to our national security”, and the other candidates reply, “Ron Paul thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a bomb”, and then ABC News does absolutely NO journalism at all.
Hey, ABC, how ’bout you do your JOB and go back to ask Ron Paul, “Um, are you OK with Iran having a bomb?” And when he says, “NO”, then report that too!!
Geesh, the media in this country stinks. You allow candidates to simply flat-out LIE to the American people, and you report it as if it’s a “50/50″ difference of opinion and therefore a wash. Well, it’s NOT. One side is clearly LYING and fearmongering, and you need to call them out on that! That’s what journalists are supposed to do!
Of course Ron Paul doesn’t think it’s OK for Iran to have the bomb. I don’t think even the Iranians think it’s OK for them to have a bomb. The difference, however, is whether or not we’d pre-emptively invade a county that we think MIGHT get a bomb.
ONE candidate thinks we shouldn’t do that, and the rest of the oil/defense-lobby-funded warmongers think we should. If NUKES were such a big deal, why didn’t we pre-emptively invade North Korea before they tested their nukes? Are South Koreans and Japanese people less important than Isrealis?
The answer is simple. OIL. Iran has lots of it, and they have the capability to block a major trade route for the rest of it. Oil companies don’t like that and defense companies see yet another opportunity to sell more weapons.
Cut oil subsidies and reduce defense spending to border security ONLY and the United States will be a prosperous nation again. These anti-American multi-national parasites are bleeding our country dry with the aid of politicians like Romney, Perry and Gingrich. The ONLY threat to our national security is the immense debt we owe to China. Period.
Posted by: Geo | December 31, 2011, 12:12 am 12:12 am
LOL! …. I beginning to think that Ron Paul took his foreign policy classes from ol’ Jane Fonda.
Posted by: Those Shallow "R's" Always Make Me Laugh! | December 31, 2011, 12:15 am 12:15 am
(this goes with my other comment) Oh, and if we had a intelligence network, that could infiltrate every ROGUE government, and terrorist group on the planet, in the meantime. Plus a visual on all hostile, anti-America, activity, as it is being developed, THAT would be NATIONAL SECURITY. With ALL THE MONEY SAVED, the United States could have intelligence EVERYWHERE.
Posted by: Torqued | December 31, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Oh sure, lets invade Iran to find their WMD. We have tried that before folks. Does anyone know how many BS wars the US has been in? Here are a couple of examples. Does anyone else remember more?
As a kid, I grew up in the early 60s during the Vietnam war. All of the establishment and talking heads told us we had to fight in Vietnam to “contain communism” and stop the “domino effect” of even more countries going communist. People used to say (until the late 1980s), that once a country goes communist, they never go back, so that is why it must be contained. We now know that that was all BS, because all communist countries eventually go back to other forms of government. Many more people (on both sides) could have died in Vietnam if we did not walk away. All those people died for no reason.
In 2001, all of the establishment and talking heads told us we had to invade Iraq to stop their Weapons of Mass Destruction. We now know that that was all BS because we could not find any WMD in the country.
Now the establishment and talking heads want to invade Iran to get their WMD???? Really?
Posted by: Datan_ds | December 31, 2011, 12:19 am 12:19 am
I am think Ron Paul is a Communinst, or maybe Ewen worst!
Posted by: Vitold | December 31, 2011, 12:27 am 12:27 am
The presstitutes are hard at work twisting Ron Paul’s words.
Posted by: Ludwig von Mises | December 31, 2011, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Romney wants to attack Iran. Surprised? Romney’s team of national security advisers includes many of the very Bush administration officials and aides who were most responsible for pushing that era’s controversial policies, from torture and warrantless wiretapping to the war in Iraq. Like Michael Chertoff Co-Chair of the Counterterrorism/Intelligence Working Group. Who’s role with Bush: Chertoff was Bush’s Secretary of Homeland Secuirty from 2005-2009, during which he helped craft the PATRIOT Act, and helped oversee many of the “tools” of the domestic war on terror, including the domestic wiretapping program. Campaign Manager:: Beth Myers, worked with Karl Rove, ….
Posted by: andrew | December 31, 2011, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Let me see if I understand this correctly.
Muslim majority Pakistan has nuclear weapons. You know the place they found Bin Laden.
Muslim majority India has nuclear weapons.
Israel which is close to Iran has nuclear weapons
and we here in the USA should worry about Iran POSSIBLY developing nuclear weapons?
Uh, a little common sense folks. I would be a lot more concerned about all the countries that already have the atomic bomb before I wasted our resources on trying to stop Iran from developing one in the future. They don’t even the missile technology to deliver a long range missile even if they had a nuke. Unless of course, our State department continued to sell everyone over there weapons like we have been doing for a long time. The Problem is our interference and our willingness to sell our older military technology to these countries. Ron Paul is right, stay the hell off the Arabian Peninsula. If Congress ever declared war on Iran, Dr. Paul would win it and end it in 10 days, without using any troops, not 10 years and Iran would be a memory.
Posted by: John | December 31, 2011, 12:34 am 12:34 am
He also has this sick idea to respect The Bill of Rights!
Giving the power back to the people!
What an undemocratic thought!
Posted by: QUINTUS
____________________________
That would be quite a surprise! Liberals like yourself usually want to give power back to the government.
Posted by: spike | December 31, 2011, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Maybe Israel should pay us for launching any military action. In the past we’ve had to pay for any war making in the middle east (which benefits them) AND given them bookoo foreign aid as well!
Posted by: Ed | December 31, 2011, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I was watching a police drama. don’t recall which one, but the bad guy had a handgun and a hostage. He was also surrounded by the police, who had handguns, shotguns and even snipers on the roof. The confrontation turns for the worse and the bad guy shoots the hostage. What happened is exactly what you would expect…all the police fired at once without mercy.
If Iran were to fire a nuclear missile at Israel (or anyone else for that matter), life would be over for Iran. You don’t make one weapon to use; you make one weapon for safety. I am more concerned about Israel going off the deep end and firing one of their hundreds of nuclear missiles.
Okay, for the readers who still think it could happen…let’s say that Iran does fire one nuclear missile on Israel; where would be the target and does it matter? The explosion would not only kill Israelis and Palestinians, but the radioactive fallout would drift into all the surrounding Arab countries and possibly drift into Iran and Russia. Do you think that Russia love the Iranians so much that they won’t be upset about some more Chernobyl activity? I would suspect that Iran would be condemned by the entire planet.
Still not convinced? Let’s say that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is Hitler, Stalin, Saddam and Satan combined and he is bent on ending the world. All he needs is to invaded by us…and we are just idiots to push him over the edge.
Maybe now you get it.
Posted by: rkm | December 31, 2011, 12:38 am 12:38 am
ron paul is pathetic ,when is he going to feel threatened ?
after its to late,once they(iran) get the bomb when it is to late to do
any thing about it, hope they wont use it or give it to
one of their proxies to do their dirty work.
what in the world is he thinking about,where is his red line?
only when a gun is pointed at his head?
the whole idea of preemption is not letting iran get to a nuclear weapon.
iran has threatened to close the straights of hormuz in the past and present
that is with out a nuclear devise,now how about them having a couple
what then?its not rons problem of course why would it be.its only the life line of the worlds
energy.and if any body thinks that ron has the where a bouts to fix the 15T problem
they got to be kidding themselves.
Posted by: elle909 | December 31, 2011, 12:39 am 12:39 am
” I beginning to think that Ron Paul took his foreign policy classes from ol’ Jane Fonda.”
LOL that’s hilarious, who are you calling old, with your Jane Fonda reference, old man.
Geez. Anyway, I guess the way you figure it, your generation borrowed 15 trillion, and with only a few years – not to be morbid, but with only a few years left topside, you can keep on borrowing and stick your grandchildren with the bill.
Your generation’s sense of right and wrong is frankly baffling – your heroism is mixed up with out and out pure selfishness.
You want to fight Iran? PAY FOR IT! Volunteer to double your income tax. Then we’ll talk.
Until then, shudup.
Posted by: rocko | December 31, 2011, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Ok Look. I spent years over there in the military. We have so many patriot missles over there, Iran could not launch a Nuke past their own border. They are not a threat, they do not have a nuke as we all now know. It is not worth 6000 more us soldiers lives and trillions of dollars to give a damn about Iran. This is about control of a oil pipeline that feeds europe. Always has been. It runs thru Lybia, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, are you seeing this a little more clearly? Google it . The pipeline is no secret Paul is correct. And Israel DOES NOT WANT OUR HELP. The prime minister told Obama that. It is on you tube
Posted by: eric | December 31, 2011, 12:41 am 12:41 am
It’s the neocons that are destroying America. If they aren’t sending your jobs overseas, they are sending your kids (not their’s of course) overseas to die. North Korea has nukes and threatens South Korea, Japan and other countries all the time. China has nukes and constantly threatens Taiwan. Nevertheless, Republicans want to start another nation-building trillion dollar war. Speaking of Bush, it was his administration with Republican approval who funded $40 million to the Taliban (Israel’s enemies) before 9/11 for supposedly fighting the failed War on Drugs.
Posted by: Chuck991 | December 31, 2011, 12:56 am 12:56 am
Ahmadinejad and the ayatollahs almost lost control (and maybe their heads) in 2009/2010 by their younger subjects. Give it a few years and the internal demographics will take care of Iran. Gotta love the bluster of the religious Taliban wing of the Republicans beating the war drums. Even the shrub didn’t take on Iran after declaring them as half the axis of evil. It would help if these idiots could remember past the last sound bite let alone the past 2 years. They might actually see a pattern and come up with a coherent low risk/high yield strategy. One of them is supposedly s history professor for christsake. Present leadership and contenders are thinking in terms of how their stock portfolio is going to improve after the vote next week and it’s why china is kicking our butt. Ron Paul least thinks in terms of decades and how events relate and that is what US needs to succeed.
Posted by: RealityCheck | December 31, 2011, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Ron, for one you are my man. I’m a a democrat, and tired of OBAMA. I’ll vote for anyone that is against the war…and pro-war with American economy. The real war is at our door steps. Wake up America, we need to fight for our jobs, and economy. We need to bring that trillions of dollars that corporations has held out of this country back. Reduce the Corporate tax, bring back the troops and spend that money on our own boarder security, which will create jobs, and make us safer…
Posted by: Waqar Khan | December 31, 2011, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Ron Paul is right.
Iraq and Vietnam should be lesson enough that when America tries to make foreign policy through war nothing good will come of it.
If we bomb Iran, shouldn’t we also bomb Pakistan and North Korea. They HAVE nuclear weapons and DON’T LIKE US.
What we should have done was let Sadaam Hussein keep the pressure in Iran to defend its borders rather than to spend time developing nuclear weapons. But when we hung Sadaam that freed the Iranian government to start developing weapons instead of defending it’s borders.
Too bad.
Posted by: naksuthin | December 31, 2011, 12:59 am 12:59 am
How are we going to protect American once the dollar crashes due to our constant spending and increasing debt for our warmongering halfway across the world?
Has Romney or Perry or Gringrich or Bachmann been able to answer this question?
I didn’t think so. I didn’t think they would. I know they won’t.
That’s the difference between the establishment and Ron Paul.
Posted by: Bran | December 31, 2011, 1:04 am 1:04 am
Libertarianism is the antithesis of Authoritarianism. Ron Paul’s message now is heard and is needed, because the bulwark of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, protecting us from tyranny, are now undermined, via the Patriot Act and the NDAA. Until the individual liberties are removed, citizens can safely sleep through any form of social planning/engineering. However, once threatened, the only answer to the problem of being detained by your own government without recourse to legal due process is Libertarianism.
People instinctively know this, and this is why no smear campaign will work, and all news about Ron Paul will only awaken more people. This is why you cannot defeat Liberty.
Only in your dreams do politically awake people go back to sleep when the economy has been destroyed.
Iran does not threaten America. Why are you being so easily mislead? The biggest threat is telling you to ‘look over there!” Geez, wake up.
Posted by: LibertyAmerica | December 31, 2011, 1:10 am 1:10 am
B-K KnightRider, you do realize the only kind of nuclear weapon Iran can develop in the near term is a fission one of low yield? And the would need to test it first, *that* would be the time to beat war drums. The only thing a port explosion would bring on Iran is nuclear annihilation from a hail hundreds of fusion bombs from the USA (they’re not that stupid). Instead of warmongering to enrich defense contractors with our lawmakers in their pockets, it is high time to take a more rational approach to foreign policy. And it is also time to quit making our biggest foreign aide recipient a first world country, Israel’s government are the biggest moochers on planet earth. they have hundreds of nuclear weapons, they can take care of themselves without being parasites on us. time to cut the apron strings.
Posted by: Ralph Ziggy | December 31, 2011, 1:11 am 1:11 am
ERIC: “We have so many patriot missles over there, Iran could not launch a Nuke past their own border.” – - – ROFLMAO. Ever hear of cars, trucks, planes, boats, subs and ships? Iran can get small nukes out without launching them on a missle. And terrorists groups that Iran might give a bomb to can get small nukes out through the same alternative methods. How can anyone seriously believe that Iran would not hesitate to give a small bomb to a terrorist group if the Iranian leaders believe they can keep it enough of a secret to get away with doing it.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 31, 2011, 1:12 am 1:12 am
This is probably the one and only thing where Ron Paul and I agree.
Posted by: whatever | December 31, 2011, 1:22 am 1:22 am
“The reality is that our military presence on foreign soil is as offensive to the people that live there as armed Chinese troops would be if they were stationed in Texas. Shutting down military bases and ceasing to deal with to deal with other nations with threats of violence is not isolationism. It is the opposite. Opening ourselves up to friendship, honest trade and diplomacy is the foreign policy of peace and prosperity.” – Ron Paul
Posted by: jaran | December 31, 2011, 1:22 am 1:22 am
ROCKO | December 31, 2011, 12:41 AM, SAID:
“LOL that’s hilarious, who are you calling old, with your Jane Fonda reference, old man. Geez. Anyway, I guess the way you figure it, your generation borrowed 15 trillion, and with only a few years – not to be morbid, but with only a few years left topside, you can keep on borrowing and stick your grandchildren with the bill.”
=============================================
Hehehehe… funny how some Republi-minions think they know the age of a person on here, based upon a comment made on a news board. These are the ones that fit in PERFECTLY with my user name. Thanks for making me laugh there ROCKO.
Posted by: Those Shallow "R's" Always Make Me Laugh! | December 31, 2011, 1:24 am 1:24 am
The USA needs an enemy. If one can’t be found we’ll make one.Just like when we gave the Soviets atomic bomb materials and technology through the lend lease program. Read: Major Jordans Diaries. Then later we gave them the ability to MIRV their missiles ( put multiple war heads on one missile ) by selling them the machines that produced the precission ball bearings they needed.All so we could have a top notch enemy. I think the push for war with Iran is part of a plan to bring on WW3. The PTB will make the USA the bully of the world and bankrupt us doing it. Our military wad being shot ,China and Russia will be enticed to attack us. Pressure is building on China now with US troops put in Australia and the US debt they hold being made worthless. The PTB will use WW3 to push for world government through the UN.Most of the sacrificial lambs for WW3 will be American. Ron Paul is the only hope!
Posted by: Dan Fuchser | December 31, 2011, 1:25 am 1:25 am
Dr. Paul has a 30 year record of upholding individual freedom, rights, liberty, based on the Constitution. He opposes the corrupt over-powered Federal government with things like the privacy invasion of the TSA, the evil Patriot Act, the 4th amendment killing NDAA bill, the racist and corrupt War on Drugs, and the unjust wars in the middle east. Ron Paul is the ONLY vote that can beat Obama, pulling votes from dissatisfied Dems, the growing Independent population, and a growing portion of the Republicans. A vote for Paul is the ONLY vote for peace, prosperity and liberty.
Posted by: Mike Ikeo | December 31, 2011, 1:42 am 1:42 am
SO what if Iran gets a bomb. If they use it, of course that would be tragic, but let’s look at this rationally. IF they drop a bomb on someone, the WHOLE world would respond to wipe them off the face of the earth. They will NOT drop a bomb on anyone. And WHY do we think protecting Isreal is in OUR OWN interest? I dont give a crap about that country. THEY HAVE NEVER DONE ANYTHING TO HELP US OR ME> They, in fact, TAKE more money for US than anyone else in the world. Let them fight their own fights. THey already conntrol our congress.
There are other “Dangerous” fanatical (some Religious) countries out there with A-bombs,(Pakistan, North Korea, adn Isreal), and we are still alive and well. I m sure we could live with
Posted by: Douglas DeMarco | December 31, 2011, 1:47 am 1:47 am
“funny how some Republi-minions think they know the age of a person on here, based upon a comment made on a news board. ”
Enjoy, old man!
Posted by: Rocko | December 31, 2011, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Here’s something that’s not speculative – people who make up words like ‘demo-fart’ or ‘republi-minions’ aren’t nearly as influential with words as they believe themselves to be.
I could care less if a republican wins office – what I care about is not running up the next trillion dollar tab to nation build another middle east country – and frankly Obama is just as likely to do that as a Romney would be…and who wants to engage that conversation?
Frankly it might involve a thought process beyond that of tit-for-tat playground name calling.
Posted by: JohnnyAce | December 31, 2011, 2:09 am 2:09 am
@JohnnyAce – I’m not a republican, I’m a democrat.
DId anywhere I state I was a republican? For a guy preaching about assuming too much, the guy assumes too much.
But look, he’s old, he’s 50 or so, doesn’t want to believe its all that old, but his mind is fading. His feet don’t carry him so far anymore.
Probably housebound, the internet his only connection to the outside world.
Let’s give him this thing, because we have to be humane.
Posted by: Rocko | December 31, 2011, 2:26 am 2:26 am
In order to size up any candidate, all you need to do is see who their major contributors are. RP is of the people, the rest are of Wall St.
Posted by: Oma | December 31, 2011, 2:28 am 2:28 am
Quite frankly IRAN doesn’t threaten our “national security” Even if they were to get a nuclear weapon (eventually no matter what we do about it, short of invasion, they will get one/just look at north Korea) they will never use it. No country on the planet will ever use a nuclear weapon again. And don’t even kid yourself.. ALL terrorism is state sponsored/controlled. NO country would EVER allow a nuclear weapon to be used against the US or anyone else for that matter.
Ron paul has my vote.. He is the only honest one running for office.
Posted by: bob denver | December 31, 2011, 2:32 am 2:32 am
What do you do when some one isn’t corrupt and can’t be influenced, call him mad, racist, radical and so on. Dr RP is winning the heart and mind of his fellow American with ideas and true leadership and the rich elite are very worried so they call the attack dogs, he hates black people, and Jews, i am black and I love this guy for being true to his word, no matter how the Jews owned media tells us he hates blacks we will never believe liars and cowards.
Don’t use our colour as political football, we know him, we believe him, and we support him.
Iran having bombs, who cares, the people who are worried are the cowards who bang the drums of war but hide when called upon to fight.
Liars.
Posted by: Sayid | December 31, 2011, 2:43 am 2:43 am
I’m so encouraged by all of these comments. It’s awesome to see so many people who are awake; who get what is happening in our country and recognize the dire mess we’re in. Ron Paul’s ideas are spreading. Liberty is spreading. The revolution is happening and I’m so honored to fight this fight. Freedom will win. RON PAUL 2012
Posted by: Kelli | December 31, 2011, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Iran may have 1 nuke in a year…how many do we have?? WE’RE THE THREAT!! It’s like having a bazooka strapped to your back while pointing at the guy down the street and calling him a threat because you think he may have a pistol in his house. Jeez people! THINK!!!
Posted by: Evan | December 31, 2011, 2:48 am 2:48 am
“Iran Does Not Threaten Our National Security”: More proof that Ron Paul is dumber than a rock and even dumber than Obama! Heaven help us all if Ron Paul becomes President!!!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 31, 2011, 3:34 am 3:34 am
All Ron Paul needs to feel at home is some face paint, a tent and a big red nose! What a clown! He has a less than a zero chance of beating Obama!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | December 31, 2011, 3:41 am 3:41 am
The US government has never been concerned with terrorism. Don’t believe me? While we were bombing 2 sovereign nations that didn’t bomb us, your government let 20 million undocumented people walk over the southern border of the US. It isn’t and has never been about terrorism. It is and has always been about natural resources and power. Over the last decade, the government has taken this opportunity to impose laws taking away your God given civil liberties and amassing power in a very centralized government. Iran is not an imminent threat. Just like history is showing that neither was Iraq. Wake up folks! Ron Paul 2012!
Posted by: donut | December 31, 2011, 3:43 am 3:43 am
Paul things it is still 1776 and that no other country can fly. He can’t remember we have trade with other countries, treaties, bi and multilateral agreements. He is a bigoted isolationist. Anyone not bothered by a human rights violator like Iran getting a nuke is insane.
Posted by: Anya | December 31, 2011, 3:54 am 3:54 am
Mr. Paul. if I remember correctly didn’t endorse “shared sacrifice” during flooding season. Now he is commenting from outside kitchen. Sometimes he seems like a cat perching “safely” on tree top. Too much of “good” is bad and very soon he would realize that. Iran tortures it’s own people, might develop nuclear weapons in future, already has record of clandestine deals with Pakistan to procure technology, threatens Israel in every opportunity and of course would not dare, threaten US in real terms – but does it make sense what Mr. Paul assumes, to appease what we like to hear, until he becomes “President”? Thanks.
Posted by: Atanu Banerjee | December 31, 2011, 3:57 am 3:57 am
Why are you trying to prey on the ignorance of your viewers ABC?
Iran is one of the few countries in the Middle East to sign a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which means they have agreed to not develop Nuclear weapons.
They are however as part of that Treaty allowed to develop Nuclear Energy.
The IAEA is the International Atomic ENERGY Agency. The numbers in their reports ARE GIVEN TO THEM BY IRAN, to show the progress of their Atomic ENERGY program.
Which is why all the experts say Iran is not doing such. Taking the reports for Atomic Energy and claiming it as Nuclear Weapon report is just ridiculous.
Posted by: smokey | December 31, 2011, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Some of whats been written here is quite relevant, but what has not been yet mentioned are the true underlying reasons America is clearly intending to provoke war with Iran.. In fact I can start by keying in on who controls 40% of our national debt, and so its us who need to understand what the better understand why Israel is the only country who would actually benefit from an and armed conflict… And if you should still have doubts.. The banking cartel known as the “The Federal Reserve” which of course is neither a federal agency such as the Treasury and also contrary to its name, its not much of a “Reserve either.. This cartel is in fact as and anyone who studies the issue will eventually find out… The “Federal Reserve banking system which of course has has never been a genuine ally to this country. but who has rather consistently encourages large scale borrowing by out govt.. and its also this same corrupt banking cartel who have simply and consistently used the threat of war, but of the only times simply love a war which is the most taxing for a country while at the same time bienn same time sa tts scommnotie thats is simply basic disrespect, for one of few truly itreaed sound and insightful operator to help the tension, Im sure the govonors was the what he micght of t hes the tnor any bodies to banks that helped crealarge scale, clearly ryga this country to participate in as many wars as possible… Why would they do this? Well, thats anti Amerrica, And so its that its the few who in fact to operate on to cubs and of course rat daughter would l be in the back soot that is dleare6 na… not that hard to understand,,, When this country borrows large scales of money, Theres always an interest payment attached that we then all…t t the the, ey8jeb e
standard rates.., large,,,,,,,,,,,,,d40% of understands the basic facts truee events shat were uoun the true and actual of some of these fundamental co how the Federal unnecessary and alow he causing this bu he hardb cartel that is always the primary ar
Posted by: Mark Smith | December 31, 2011, 4:31 am 4:31 am
I LOVE RON PAUL AND SUPPORT HIM 1000% ALL THE OTHER CANDIDATES CANT EVEN ANSWER QUESTIONS BUT INSTEAD BASH ON THE COMPETITION, ALL THE REPUBLICANS AT THE DEBATES HAVE BEEN STUDIED BY BODY LANGUAGE AND SINCERITY EXPERTS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD AND RON PAUL IS THE ONLY ONE THEY SAID THAT WAS AS REAL AND HONEST AS COULD BE, THE OTHERS…FULL OF IT
Posted by: DIANA | December 31, 2011, 4:40 am 4:40 am
Mr Paul has some new ideas and that is what appeals to some, but the fact is he is living in a small bobble of his own ideals and mind. The fact is he does not understand that US and world are two and the same, same goes for every other country. If japan gets a punch in the head we will feel the headach, or Isreail for that matter. The world is not isolated territories any moymore. The internet, tools, economy and technology all have all broken down the barriers and borderes, Russia, China they want their share of prospeerity and wealth, the question is with limited resources in the world what are our global philosophy, how we gonna share the resources, are we willing to down grade our life style much much less than what it is now to accomodate China, Russia, India with explosive population and much less care for the world wellbeing. Another consideration of importance, where they stand when it comes to sharing and caring and if they share the values that we do when it comes to humaniterian ideals, with their track record we know the answer!. In the end, if Mr Paul thinks Iranina thugs share the values of co existance and brotherhood, humanity, just let him live in Iran a month and se how they teat their own people, the minorities, the political advocates, then may be he will understand why we live in the satte we are and why the previous presidents had made tough chouces they needed to. Mr paul Orld is bigger than your small bobble and surely not as frienly as you want it to be at the present..
Posted by: Brue | December 31, 2011, 4:58 am 4:58 am
Go to Youtube and type in Ron Paul is America’s Last Stand For Freedom
Posted by: Doug | December 31, 2011, 5:06 am 5:06 am
horribly biased article, all the way down to the picture, RP 2012, good luck stopping us ABC
Posted by: rokiat | December 31, 2011, 5:11 am 5:11 am
While I cannot agree with Paul on a lot of issues, he just might have something here. First, as long as we have nuclear weapons, how can we have credibility in telling someone else they cannot have them also? Iran’s primary potential enemy is Israel. Since 1948, Israel has proven many times over that it can defend itself very well. If Iran does go to war with Israel, Israel will wipe the floor with them. Why should we be involved then? Bush tried to set up the European Missile Defense System and Obama, to a lesser extent, has continued this effort. Both conceded the intent of the system was primarily to defend Europe. If that is so, why not let Europe set up the system? Why us? We already have such a working system based in Kwajalean and CA.
We very badly need to let go of the concept that we are the world’s policeman because we no longer are. This next week, our national debt will go up to $16.5 trillion. Our preoccupation of being the world’s cop really hurts the goal of brining the debt down.
Posted by: Bob Ramos | December 31, 2011, 5:47 am 5:47 am
Ron Paul will not win the GOP nomination. But I sincrerely hope that he runs as an Independent. As such, he will be presenting sides that need to be in the forefront during interviews and in the Presidential debates. Neither Obama or the GOP nominee will be able to ignore those issues then.
Posted by: Bob Ramos | December 31, 2011, 5:53 am 5:53 am
The clueless idiots that are so terrified of the big bad terrorists annoy the hell out of me! We’ve meddled in the business of so many countries for so many years…Korea…Vietnam…Iraq….Afghanistan…Libya….and now we want to invade Iran!?!? Come on people!! Who are the real terrorists….the globalist NWO banker controlled United States is the real terrorist!! Ron Paul is right!! Bring all of our troops home, restore the Constitution, return the power to the states, and mind our own damn business!! WAAAAHHH….I’m so afraid of those big bad terrorists….quit your whining and WAKE UP….how many innocent civilians and military men have been killed or disabled because of our globalist foreign policy??? Are you that stupid to think if we returned our troops to US soil, guarded our borders, and minded our own damn business that we are more vulnerable to those mean terrorists?? We have nukes all over the world!! No one is going to attack us!! If the clueless Americans that want to attack Iran and continue to operate 900 bases in over 130 countries, then you pay for it…you sacrifice your life and the life of your children and grandchildren!! RON PAUL 2012!!
Posted by: WAKEUP | December 31, 2011, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Can the USA or anyone afford to have a nuclear missile Pearl Harbor? Having warships at the ready is not soon enough. We had better get our intel straight, right, and fast but not sit back and wait for devistation to fall on our shores before we react. “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” I agree that we should bring our troops home and scale down our presense offshore and divert our foreigh aid to the aid of the homeless and needy at home. Call me selfish but I prefer defensive confrontation not on our own soil and not with the killing of our civilians and economy. 9/11 was bad enough, picture in your mind a whole city destroyed by a missle inbound nuke from some terrorist or foreign nuthead leader whom we could have taken out before the capability was in place and in his or their hands. Those are the hard choices a President must face and defuse.
Posted by: Robert Darling | December 31, 2011, 7:03 am 7:03 am
BOB RAMOS: “First, as long as we have nuclear weapons, how can we have credibility in telling someone else they cannot have them also?” – - – That is easy. Because it is our official policy to never use them first against somone else. We have them as a deterrent, and the MAD policy has worked for more than 50 years. But there are some nuts out there who are delusional enough to believe they can figure out a way to get away with using a small one against Israel or us. You know, the kind of nuts who are willing to blow themselves up with 10 pounds of C4 and dozens of ball bearings strapped to their body or whle driving a car/truck with a few hundred pounds of explosives. Why would they not do the same thing with a small nuke if they could get one? And why would Iran not readily give some to those kinds of people, especially if they believe they could get away with giving two or three away? Anyone who is either unable to understand or refuses to acknowledge the possibility that Iran is willing to use an external terrorist organization as their proxy to deliver a small tactical nuke against Israel or us by any means necessary – i.e backpack, camel, donkey, horse, car, truck, bus, boat, ship, or small private plane just to name a few is a delusional idiot. There are a LOT of ways Iran could arange to have a proxy deliver nukes without them having to fire a single missle or have their finger prints on it.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 31, 2011, 7:05 am 7:05 am
Most people seem stuck in the mind set of the cold war and are too trigger happy to start wars that have proven to be wasteful and unnecessary. Example, bush’s war in Iraq. Ron Paul is right, Iran does not pose a threat to out national security and there is not any evidence that Iran is developing, or has developed a nuclear device. I would question the saber rattler’s motives in terms of any past or present relationship with war profiteers as per bush’s connection with the Carlyle corporation and cheney’s connection with Haliburton.
Posted by: john locke | December 31, 2011, 7:09 am 7:09 am
I will vote for Ron Paul as he is the best candidate for President, not just because he has a certain view on a certain topic. The USA will always be the world’s strongest, most powerful and richest nation. I have faith in America.
As for those who say America is in debt, we can afford it as we are the world’s richest nation with a net worth of US$280 trillion after minusing the debt. We overspend because we care for our citizens, unlike China which kills their own citizens with tainted milk and force many of their own to go overseas to seek a better life.
China’s infrastructure is not even good nor safe. Many citizens can’t even afford to take a train nor a bus. Their factories are closing and many workers are on strike. The whole of China is collapsing economically forever. China will be a failed state.
China will never reach the moon because they are using old Soviet technology, and the Soviets never reached the moon, and China will never reach the moon because they fake everything, from their news to their technology. China will be a failed state.
I’m proud to call myself an American. The USA will always be number one. Love America lots.
Posted by: Ronald Smith | December 31, 2011, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Regardless all that I just think that America should stop gaining more enemies
Posted by: mzatar | December 31, 2011, 7:50 am 7:50 am
Ron Paul appears to not know who might attack us who might not! Like Obama he would turn on
the Jewish people in a heart beat. What is really sad is we have no body worth a hoot running for President! Mitt,Perry,Newt all really want to disarm all honest people. Almost everyone Running for president has way to much money to know anything about the problems of the working people and shouldn’t be elected dog catcher!
Posted by: Ronald R. Johnson | December 31, 2011, 8:20 am 8:20 am
the fact is everything stays the same with anyone but Ron Paul. I need change so I van vote for no other than Ron Paul
Posted by: Tak | December 31, 2011, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Mr. Paul is certifiable. An ignorant and dangerous man.
Posted by: ray | December 31, 2011, 8:34 am 8:34 am
If I lived in a country that the US attacked because the US thought that sometime in the future that country could be a threat, and one of my children or close relatives was killed, I would spend the rest of my life trying to find a way to hurt the US, and I would teach my children and have them teach their children to never forgive or forget even if it took 200 years. I have no doubt that there are already people in the would thinking this way and I wouldn’t want to add to that number. In a hundred years almost anybody will be able to build a nuclear weapon. It would have been better to loose 500,000 invading Japan (an invasion that would have never been required anyway) than to have built and used nuclear weapons.
Posted by: Tom Adams | December 31, 2011, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I’m concerned about Paul. He may bring back some honor and credibility back to America then who will grease our greasy elected officials? ~ who will allow Wall Street to fleece us with their lies and super computers? ~ who will drum up false and unnecessary wars?
Posted by: Matt8265 | December 31, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am
USA will be doomed with Ron Paul. He thought USA is living in the year 1800.
Posted by: Yon | December 31, 2011, 8:53 am 8:53 am
“It would have been better to loose 500,000 invading Japan (an invasion that would have never been required anyway) than to have built and used nuclear weapons.”
Wow! guess you caught up on lost sleep in your history classes, if you attended at all. Estimates from credible sources predicted 1 million US casualties. The invasion would have been required. Pity you did not have to crawl ashore on Iwo Jima or spent a few months on Okinawa to appreciate this fact. Easy to say 500.000 deaths are ok if you’re backside is not on the line. Have a cold-one Von Clausewitz and take satisfaction in the fact that your vote will unfortunately cancel the vote of someone who has a clue.
Posted by: James | December 31, 2011, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Ron Paul is a senile old coot who needs to go home…we do not need an isolationist in the White House, but do need someone who has a gut-level view of how the world community works and the US place in that community. We have one planet…we have factions that want to destroy people…we need someone in the White House who knows diplomacy, level-headed decision making, has a good working relationship with the leaders of the free world, and someone who can, with all these other concerns, do the best job for Americans here at home. All teavangelical/repub/libertarian wanna-be’s are, at the very least, anti-American in their pronouncements of what they would do if they became POTUS…all are dangerous, unqualified, and unbelievable…they are, to a man and woman, liars of the first order…owned by the wealthy, pandering to the fears of people, preaching a new order for “the United States of Christianity”, and will say anything to anyone (truth or lie) to garner a vote. There is only one man who can do the job for America and who can monitor conditions in the Middle East, making prudent and cautious decisions about our reactions to unfolding events…OBAMA 11/6/2012.
Posted by: snydergal | December 31, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am
When Ron Paul fails to secure the presidential nomination from his Party – WHEN that happens, as it surely will – y’all here will have no one to blame but the Republican Party. THEY DON’T LIKE PAUL. And they will not let him be their man against Obama next year because they know he would get destroyed in a general election. Ron Paul will never be President of the United States and Commander in Chief of her Armed Forces. Period. THAT is the cynical truth.
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Well he just lost my vote. Battleships off our shore? Duh. We don’t need to worry about Iran’s Navy attacking us. This guy just proved himself certifiable. No proof Iran is building a nuclear weapon? What proof do you need? A smoking crater where Fenway Park used to be?
Then he says, ” Well if some other country (Israel) feels the need to attack them then so be it.”
Could he be any more indifferent about it?
Posted by: mobredthree | December 31, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Ron Paul is an American Veteran. Mitt Romney is a draft dodger!
Posted by: bob | December 31, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Ron Paul is an American Veteran. Mitt Romney is a draft dodger!
Posted by: bob | December 31, 2011, 9:55 am.
So what? Reverend Jeremiah Wright is also an American Veteran who served in Vietnam, yet the Right absolutely HATES him. What’s your point? FYI, Romney did the same thing as Gingrich and Cheney – they got deferments. GW didn’t need deferments because his Daddy got him into the National Guard so he could avoid Vietnam. So again – what’s your point?
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am
A CYNIC: Jeremiah Wright isn’t running for President! And you’re right, Ron Paul is very dangerous, he want to go by the Constitution
Posted by: bob | December 31, 2011, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Iran isn’t going to give anyone a nuclear bomb. If they did, and it was used, it would be traced back to Iran and that would the end of Iran. They are not dumb. They just like to intimidate and antagonize the world with their silly rhetoric. I have to say Ron Paul is right on this one. Iran is not in our back yard. They are that side of the world’s problem. If it becomes a mess, like Nazi Germany and Japan, then the U.S. will step in with its allies and fix the problem. I don’t think we need to give Iran any more ammunition by getting into a school yard spat with them. Just ignore them and they will go away.
Posted by: Terry | December 31, 2011, 10:24 am 10:24 am
People need to stop viewing the world through rosey colored american glasses. News flash americans, we are supporting the very thing abroad that we condemn here, that is terrorism. We are funding and giving arms to terrorists within iran. Our special forces are active there, blowing up missile sites, assassinating scientists. We just overthrew iraq, and libya and and speak openly of overthrowing iran. If they want to get nukes, why do you think that is? could it be they are afraid that maybe they will be next?
I do not support shariah law, nor theocracies. But the fact of the matter is that the only reason we are going after iran is because of the evangelical support for israel in this country. Why are we going to send off our young men and women to die for a foreign country which has never done anything for us? Just a couple weeks ago they were caught trying to sell our patriot missles to china, and that was not the first time they have sold our technology to china. Yet there has been absolutely no discussion about the fact that they are backdooring our technology to countries which are not friendly to the USA.
America used to be a bastion of freedom and peace. We never involved ourselves in fruitless wars unless absolutely necessary. This is insanity! To those that want to go to war, i hope it is not your son or daughter that pays the ultimate sacrifice for it.
It is time to take a step back and look at our progress for the past 30 or 40 years. Are we going down the road of peace and prosperity or are we turning into a fallen empire? We have 15 trillion in debt, and another 50 trillion in future promises that we will never be able to keep.
We need a change, we can keep on electing washington insiders and unethical politicians who support the status quo, who will continue to bail out wallstreet and fill cabinents with wallstreet insiders, or we can elect someone who will bring change to washington, someone who will stand for constitutional ideals.
Posted by: justin | December 31, 2011, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Actions speak louder than words. What has Ron Paul done that the media is soo biased against him. It is totally shameful that Mitt Romney is not prepared to disclose his tax returns and wants his blind supporters to vote for him in Iowa and muddy the elections. If he fails to show his tax returns for 2010 within the next 24 hours it should be concluded that either he paid little or no taxes for the millions he got from his wealth or he got his earnings by means that are not above board, At this rate I bet Mitt Romney is unelectable in 2012 as he was in 2008 and is just wasting the time of those supporting him. I had previously thought that Romney would be acceptable as a president but the unethical way in which he has behaved, I would find him unacceptable to lead the country. It is no wonder that he cannot cross the 23-25% of the Republican support which he probably bought with his money (not counting NH). At least Ron Paul is recently presenting practical alternate views that the country can benefit from even though any of the Republican bunch may find it hard to dislodge the incumbent in the WH.
Posted by: Girish | December 31, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am
POSTED BY: ACE | DECEMBER 31, 2011, 12:02 AM 12:02 AM, you always bring up oil, when was the last time we confiscated middle east oilfields?
Posted by: Lizzie | December 31, 2011, 11:44 am 11:44 am
bob | December 31, 2011, 10:10 am post —— So now our president has to be a veteran? Is that your position? Again, why make it a point to bring up the fact that Paul is a veteran and his opponents are not?
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 11:45 am 11:45 am
POSTED BY: A CYNIC | DECEMBER 31, 2011, 10:03 AM 10:03 AM, did Obama ever serve or did he manage to get by, by not being old enough or in the illinois senate.
A CYNIC, so why does rev. Wright hate america so.
And to those who love Ron Pauls foreign policies, just go back to Pres. Carter and Pres. Clinton, they both told us we are safe and noone will EVER attack the USA, we dont need intelligense see were that has gotten us. 9/11
Posted by: Lizzie | December 31, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
LIZZIE: That’s true, but then a Republican won the presidency. That’s why we were attacked. Vote Democrat and we’ll be safe.
Posted by: bob | December 31, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
As it is, it seems very family on the face of the earth will its own nuke. Whenever there is a family feud, we can just start throwing them at each other. Way to go people.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | December 31, 2011, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I’d have a hard time voting for any Republican for president, but Ron Paul seems to be the most honest and well thought out candidate the Republicans have to offer.
Posted by: Dan L | December 31, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
What has Ron Paul done that the media is soo biased against him.
Posted by: Girish | December 31, 2011, 11:03 am.
Nothing. That is his record of accomplishment in Congress. Nothing. Ron Paul has sponsored 421 bills since Jan 7, 1997, of which 418 haven’t made it out of committee and only 1 was successfully enacted. He has sponsored 47 bills alone this year since the Republicans regained control of the House, none of which have made it out of committee. He puts in earmark requests but claims he doesn’t vote on the bills he puts them in. So he really hasn’t “done” anything in Congress besides occupy a seat in the House on the Right side of the aisle and write bills that his own Party doesn’t like. It’s obvious the Republican powers-that-be don’t want his brand of Republicanism.
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Ron Paul appears to be an old man who does not quite have all his marbles.. He will have his head handed to him by Mr. Obama in the debates. Get real people.. this guy is a fool.
Romney will lose to Obama just because he is an empty suit with no plan.. Paul will lose to Obama just because he is insane.
Posted by: erick_z | December 31, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Lizzie | December 31, 2011, 12:18 pm post ——– Obama did not volunteer for the military, he went to college. The draft had already ended. There were no wars going on when he turned 18. Reverend Wright doesn’t hate America. If you bothered to look into his life you would know that. He served in Vietnam both as a Marine and as a Navy corpsman. Like most people on the Right, you heard a three-word sound byte taken out of context and automatically assumed something horrible. Someone posted that Ron Paul was a veteran while Mitt Romney was a draft dodger, which is how that thread got going. I asked what relevance that had to foreign policy experience. I think it has no relevance, especially since his military career ended over 40 years ago.
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Who says we are going to war with Iran? Mr. Paul, yes, Iran IS INDEED a threat to our security, but it does not mean we need to go to war. However, we MUST ensure that our country is safe from those who have said continuously that they want to destroy us. We cannot afford a president, like we already have, who is too timid to protect this nation. Of course we all want peace, but with radicals in countries in the Middle East, it will never happen. I beg of people this year to vote smart. Our nation is dwindling as is our freedom. Lord, help us all!
Posted by: Weijo | December 31, 2011, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
The Vatican “could” have a nuclear weapon some day. So when do we start bombing there?
Posted by: GrandInquisitor | December 31, 2011, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Launching a pre-emptive war (like GW Bush did in Iraq) is like committing suicide because you’re afraid you’re going to get killed.
Posted by: A Cynic | December 31, 2011, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
GANDINQUISITOR: “The vatican “could” have a nuclear weapon some day. So when do we start bombing there?” – - – ROFLMAO. That is just about the most stupidly ludicrous analogy I have ever seen. The Vatican is not a threat to us and does not publicly profess it is threat to us. Unlike Iran which very loudly and publicly proclaims it is hostile toward us, and that makes Iran a threat. Then there is Iran’s history of proactively arming and supporting the terrorists who have been fighting our troops. That also clearly demonstrates Iran is a threat to us.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | December 31, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Here is a very pragmatic question for everyone who agrees with Paul and insists Iran is not a threat to us. Can we really afford to take the chance that you and Paul are wrong?
Posted by: B-K knightRider | December 31, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
I’m sorry, but this is why no one can trust Ron Paul with foreign affairs. There is plenty of evidence that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. The IAEA found advanced warhead prototypes in 2002, they found weapons grade enriched plutonium in 2005 on some machinery, several defected scientists have confirmed this, Israel has provided actual photographic and video evidence of a program. A nuclear weapon needs three parts: 1) a delivery system (missile, truck, etc), 2) a warhead/detonation device, and 3) the fissile core (plutonium/uranium). Iran already has #1, and #2… and they are furiously refining uranium as fast as they can to achieve #3.
They have been in a state of war with us since 1979, have been directly and indirectly involved in numerous terror attacks against us and the west in general since then, and they were directly attacking us in Iraq in 2007 – which, if not an act of war, sure is incredibly stupid. They even an annual “death to israel” and “death to america” day, and their President and Ayatollah are both Twelvers, who believe they have to “set the world afire” to hasten the return of the twelfth Imam. A second holocaust would only be the beginning of the nightmares they could unleash upon the world.
They have been cooperating fairly openly with every regime that hates us: NKorea, Venezuela, Syria, Cuba; and they have active ties to all the major terrorist organizations. They also have on numerous occasions discussed our destruction, even advocated the use of EMP weapons to accomplish the task (which would work, and why Romney’s ignorance is particulary dangerous, too). And almost every respectable intel service on the planet believes they are seeking nukes as well – even Germany’s had to testify in court that our 2007 NIE which exonerated Iran, was false.
The ONLY evidence that we have that Iran is not seeking nukes is Iran and Ron Paul’s wishful thinking. That’s it. And, I’m sorry, but Paul is not qualified to make such a determination. Ron Paul is an idiot, and a dangerous one at that. That Ron Paul supporters can’t see that only betrays your ignorance as well.
Posted by: jrobinson | December 31, 2011, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
If Iran fighting Americans in Iraq was an act of war, was the United States helping Iraq fight Iran an act of war? It’s typical arrogant America-centrism to say that the history of the conflict between the United States and Iran began in 1979 and not 1953.
Posted by: Thomas Robertson | December 31, 2011, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
B-K Knightrider, did the United States arm and support SAVAK?
Posted by: Thomas Robertson | December 31, 2011, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Justin, the leaders of Iran also see that the United States doesn’t attack enemies such as North Korea which have the bomb.
B-K Knightrider, didn’t the United States support, if not also arm, SAVAK? Just as Japan started it in 1941, the United States started it with Iran in 1953. The extent to which the people of the United States overwhelmingly believe that the laws of political science are different for their country amazes me . It’s comparable to people from China believing that gravity applies to them differently.
Posted by: Thomas Robertson | December 31, 2011, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Give me a break, Mobredthree. Dr. Paul’s comment about battleships off the shore can’t be taken as saying that he believes that’s a more dangerous threat than nuclear weapons.
Posted by: Thomas Robertson | December 31, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
If you search “Iran months from nuclear weapon” you get stories that go back to 1979.
Legally, they have the right to the weapon anyway.
Our government is STILL LYING.
Posted by: bob | January 1, 2012, 12:27 am 12:27 am