Dec 17, 2011 8:31am

Ron Paul Takes Swipes at GOP Rivals, Says Michele Bachmann ‘Hates Muslims’

gty ron paul jt 111204 wblog Ron Paul Takes Swipes at GOP Rivals, Says Michele Bachmann Hates Muslims

Melina Mara/The Washington Post/Getty Images

Ron Paul has gone Hollywood.

Appearing on “The Tonight Show with Jay Leno” Friday, the presidential hopeful took a swipe at his GOP rivals telling the crowd that Michele Bachmann “hates Muslims.”

When asked by host Jay Leno what he thought of his rivals, Paul shook his head, slowed his voice and said, “she doesn’t like Muslims, she hates them, she wants to go get ‘em” — in reference to the comments Bachmann has made on the campaign trail over her willingness to attack Iran over its suspected nuclear program.

Bachmann, who is campaigning today in Iowa, rejected Paul’s comments.

“Of course I don’t hate Muslims,” Bachmann told ABC News adding “that’s an absolutely outrageous statement.”

Bachmann then elaborated on her view that Iran is trying to obtain a nuclear weapons program to destroy Israel and the United States.

“With all due respect to my colleague, I think Ron Paul would make a very dangerous president because he doesn’t understand this threat,” Bachmann added.

The comment was especially surprising for Paul, who up until now has shied away from personal attacks.

The comment even left the audience and host Jay Leno momentarily stunned.

In reference to Rick Santorum, Paul said he can’t stop talking about “gay people and Muslims.”

When asked what he thought of Mitt Romney, Paul thought for a second and replied, “he was governor of Massachusetts?”

The answer generated laughs from the audience and Paul responded, “that’s where he should stay at.”

Paul used the rare late night appearance to elaborate on some of his libertarian leaning positions such as getting rid of federal drug laws in favor of state regulations.

Paul added that the federal government should “protect the right to do with our own body what we want.”

When asked if he was in favor of seat belt laws, Paul quickly shot back “I’m in favor of seat belts, not seat belt laws.”

Paul walked out to a standing ovation by the mainly youthful audience. The fact wasn’t lost on Leno who noted that he drew lots of support from young people.

“Young people are principled,” said Paul adding that “after a while you get mixed up.”

Paul also touched on his ongoing feud with Donald Trump, telling Leno that the New York real estate magnate is “a little offended” he didn’t accept his GOP debate invitation.

Paul said “he thinks I can’t win.”

Leno shot back, “why don’t you remind him you won 12 times.”

The Congressman again said he has “no intention” of running on a third party ticket but added he hasn’t ruled it out.

When asked who his favorite president was, Paul in a nod to his nickname “Dr. No,” responded Grover Cleveland because “he loved to veto bills.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Ron Paul gets better and better, I’m starting to cheer for the cranky old dude!

Posted by: jamesK | December 17, 2011, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Well, he ain’t lyin’. Muslims are simply one of the groups that she hates……

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Ron Paul is awesome. He will get even more voter support after the Tonight Show.

Posted by: MarkP | December 17, 2011, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Yeah, Paul was responding to a riff Leno had going about the other candidates, but he will likely regret saying Bachmann ‘hates Muslims’, but I think he is legitimately dismayed at her willingness to attack the middle east, and doesn’t know how to account for it.

Posted by: RK | December 17, 2011, 9:07 am 9:07 am

you could have added that it was jay leno who said santorum doesn’t like gay people, to which Dr. Paul responded “and muslims”. and you could have also mentioned he doesn’t agree with the government telling you what to do with your body. he doesn’t condone drug use and not wearing seat belts but he does believe people cannot tell you what to do with your body because it is YOURS.

Posted by: katherine | December 17, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Only a person that fear mongers as much as Bachman… that LIES about an eminent threat… that LIES about IRAN wanting to “wipe Israel and America off the map”… LIES LIES LIES… that IS someone who hates an entire culture.

Posted by: Tim Quillan | December 17, 2011, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Well, James said it, “He ain’t lyin’”.

Posted by: Goerge H | December 17, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am

“…and you could have also mentioned he doesn’t agree with the government telling you what to do with your body. he doesn’t condone drug use and not wearing seat belts but he does believe people cannot tell you what to do with your body because it is YOURS. Posted by:
Posted by: katherine | December 17, 2011, 9:18 am ————- Yet he’s anti abortion and anti gay marriage. So which is it? Does he support individual rights for everyone? Or just some? If it’s just some, then he’s a hypocrite.

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Ron Paul simply did last night on Leno what he does consistently: Tell the truth. The truth is, Michelle Bachmann hates Muslims, and it’s about time someone called her out on it.

Posted by: Joey | December 17, 2011, 9:32 am 9:32 am

““Young people are principled,” said Paul adding that “after a while you get mixed up.” ~~~~~~~ And unlike all those OTHER people who’ve “gotten mixed up” when it comes to principles, he’s the obvious exception to his own rule, right???? Gotta love that “if you support me, you’re principled and if you don’t, you’re mixed up” attitude.

Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 17, 2011, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Well of course. He could have included a lot of extra information to put this in context. But Jason Volack isn’t interested in informing people or being objective. He is interested in stirring up drama and BS. It is no surprise that all of Jay Leno’s comments from the beginning of the show are not included in the article. Here are some:

Spoken By Jay Leno himself:
“Do you know he is a gynecologist who has delivered over 4000 babies? He’s seen almost as many women naked as Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain combined.”
“[Rick Perry] said he is the Tim Tebow of Iowa. The big difference? Tim Tebow actually has a prayer.”
“Ron Paul is anti-Fed, Mitt Romney is pro-Fed, and Newt Gingrich is over-fed.”

This is called satire Jason. It is meant to be funny and witty and you are treating it like literal statements meant to insult. Ron Paul was just adding to the jokes. Work on your journalism skills.

Posted by: Sheila | December 17, 2011, 9:35 am 9:35 am

The establishment Republicans are in denial. They think Americans are on board with their constant war rhetoric; most Americans are not. That is one of many reasons why Ron Paul is so appealing as a candidate. If Ron Paul isn’t the Republican candidate, Obama will win.

Posted by: RP1 | December 17, 2011, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Searambler “Yet he’s anti abortion and anti gay marriage. So which is it? Does he support individual rights for everyone?”

He believes government should not be in marriage. He thinks it is up to each religion or church to provide marriage and government not to be part of it at all. He is against abortion because in his eyes the unborn baby also has a right.

Ron Paul believes people have a right to do what they want as long as they don’t infringe on another person’s right.

Posted by: Bo | December 17, 2011, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Like Obama, Ron Paul adores Muslims and hates Christians. So, how was your day?

Posted by: Duude | December 17, 2011, 9:41 am 9:41 am

“…and you could have also mentioned he doesn’t agree with the government telling you what to do with your body. he doesn’t condone drug use and not wearing seat belts but he does believe people cannot tell you what to do with your body because it is YOURS. Posted by:
Posted by: katherine | December 17, 2011, 9:18 am

Yet he’s anti abortion and anti gay marriage. So which is it? Does he support individual rights for everyone? Or just some? If it’s just some, then he’s a hypocrite.
Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am

SEARAMBLER — he PERSONALLY believes abortion is wrong but does not think the federal government has any right to make laws against it. He believes that the states have the duty to make up laws about this, if they so choose. ALSO, he has said time and time again that the government has NO BUSINESS telling people who to marry. He believes it’s a stupid argument and shouldn’t even be a federal issue. It should be left up to the states and churches and people can marry who they want. He’s no hypocrite. He even discussed this last night on the Leno show. If you’re interested, do some research into his beliefs. Read his book “Liberty Defined: 50 Essential Issues That Affect Our Freedom” and all of his positions are explained in detail.

Posted by: Lizz | December 17, 2011, 9:44 am 9:44 am

W/hat Ron Paul still doesn’t get is his youthful followers only care about one issue–drugs. They want to eliminate drug laws. As for his views on Iran, the Federal Reserve, and even the US debt, they could care less if they get all the drugs they want.

Posted by: Blythe | December 17, 2011, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Thank you for the column, Jason. Paul’s candid, blunt remarks are probably a testament to the fact he realized he was being interviewed by Leno in a non-”gotcha” way, and so he rewarded Leno’s candor with candor of his own, although a more cautious approach would to have avoided the word “hate”. But that having been said, Paul is brutally honest, to a fault sometimes, and this is a sample of the kind of brutal honest and “laying it all on the table” that we need in a president after years of presidents from both parties promising transparency and then going into “covert operations mode” once elected.

Posted by: Darryl Schmitz | December 17, 2011, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Doesn’t everybody?

Posted by: gene | December 17, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Its not about the drugs, I myself do not even drink alcohol but I believe everyone is entitled to do what they want to themselves so long as it doesn’t harm others, its about time we get rid of the nanny state.

Posted by: Henry | December 17, 2011, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I love Ron Paul but he really should have stood up in the debate when she told him he scared her with his anti-milititary stance, he should have turned to her and said, NO, YOU SCARE ME BIG TIME WITH YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SEND OUR CHILDREN TO WAR OVER EVERY LITTLE PARANOID FEAR IN YOUR HEAD. But, he’s too much of a gentleman to do that at the right time and obviously thought about it afterwards!

Posted by: Nancy | December 17, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am

@ George H. – Yes, I agree that he is anti-gay marriage and anti-abortion, but if you actually paid attention to what he says, you would realize that he wants the government to stay out of marriage altogether and let the church handle it and that he wants the states to decide on the abortion issue. So again, do not just assume. read up on his views before posting.

Posted by: Matthew H. | December 17, 2011, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I love when the craziest tell us how crazy the other crazies are. Ron Paul can’t even carry his own state. He’s never won a primary in all the times he’s run before, and if by some fluke he wins one this time, he stands no chance of winning the presidency. There are still too many sane people in this country.

Although looking at the crop of GOP contenders, one has to wonder how seriously depleted those numbers are.

Posted by: Lee | December 17, 2011, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Lizz says that young people just care about him getting rid of the drug wars that is reason they are voting for him.. That is so completely UNTRUE. Young people care about their freedom and liberty LIzz, apparently something you don’t care about???? Plus, drug wars are anti-humanity and need to GO they are unconstitutional but apparently Lizz doesn’t mind being poked and proded by paramilitary police and HER door knocked down for a WEED.

Posted by: nancy | December 17, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Yes BO,

Like Bush, Backmann will attack another Muslim country based on lies, so that the Israelis can build more homes, in the occupied territories, for the racist and terrorist Jewish settlers. One question for you. How do you pay for the cost another war (2,000,000,000,000.00 dollars)?

Posted by: American Taxpayer | December 17, 2011, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Plus, drug wars are anti-humanity and need to GO they are unconstitutional but apparently Lizz doesn’t mind being poked and proded by paramilitary police and HER door knocked down for a WEED.

POSTED BY: NANCY | DECEMBER 17, 2011, 10:03 AM===If Lizz doesn’t smoke weed then she doesn’t have to worry about her door being knocked down.

Posted by: susan | December 17, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am

@ Lee – Please inform us of your “sane” ideas. Lets start with a few questions. How much do you enjoy sending people to their deaths with no proof of any wrong doing? How much more money do you think we should borrow from china to pay other countries to be our “friends”? Do you dislike the rights afforded to you by the founding fathers or were they just a crazy as Paul? Of course if big corporations don’t support someone, they must be crazy.

Posted by: Matthew H. | December 17, 2011, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Ron Paul is acting out like the ignorant fool that he is. Somehow certain defectives are giving heed to his words and he keeps supplying new outrages for their consumption. (Not sure how he managed to produce son who (so far) seems to be a competent and reasonable human being).
Israel must be supported at all costs. The Middle East is an area that transcends politics as usual and must be treated as such.

Posted by: twd73 | December 17, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am

If you do not like freedom.If you think that you have to have a government tell you what is right for you.YOU PROBABLY WILL NOT LIKE RON PAUL.

Posted by: jack | December 17, 2011, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I’m 45 and my husband and I watched it with a group of 6 young (early 20′s)men. Several of the men were already supporters…one was a young black fella who had never heard Ron speak before and was just going to go along party lines. He grasped the Ron Paul policies and immediately embraced Ron as his choice for president. The Leno show is a comedy show and Ron played his part. Leno was not shocked…he was goading Ron after Ron initially appeared not to go along with the Roast of the other candidates. You must watch the video to understand the context. Ron showed he was not some befuddled old man and that his faculties are quick.

Posted by: Julie | December 17, 2011, 10:23 am 10:23 am

So it’s OK to be a Jew hater, just not a Muslim hater. I’s OK to be a racist, but better no run afoul of CAIR, no, no, no.

Posted by: Johnny | December 17, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I’ll tell you why Ron Paul has a shot. I am a 54 year old who is as cynical as a person can be. I despise the lying, corrupt, and incredibly wasteful government. I don’t trust the mass media as far as I could throw them. I used to be an avid FOX listener until I saw the way they ignored Ron Paul and that’s when I woke up to the fact that FOX is just like the other major stations, only they lean right while the others lean left. Truthfully they’re all full of it. Anyway, to get back on subject, this middle aged cynic who has never donated a red cent to a political party or politician has already donated $300 to Ron Paul. I know it’s not a ton of money but I am doing what I can and as long as he has a fighting chance I will send him every spare cent I can. Why? the reason is that Dr. Paul gives me a reason to set aside my cynicism and believe that we finally have a man who if elected, would expose the corruption that is our government. He would bring real solutions to the countries problems. He would return the liberties that are being removed ever so slowly so you don’t notice but they are doing it. He is everything that the other candidates are not. He oozes integrity, honesty, intelligence, and has a voting record that proves he’s been consistently right even when he was forced to stand by himself on major issues. He has been shunned, made light of, and the media has made him near invisible to the voters. In spite of this he is still standing and fighting for us. He doesn’t want to be president for his own benefits like the rest. He wants to fundamentally change the direction of this country before our government completely destroys everything that made this the greatest country in the world. Yes, I am an awful cynic. I believe in very little anymore but the one thing I absolutely believe is that Ron Paul will bring us back from the brink of catastrophe. I believe that once he pulls the curtains open on the FED and D.C. politics the American people will finally realize what fools they’ve been and they will never let things go back to the way they are now. President Paul. I like the sound of it.

Posted by: Michael Seamon | December 17, 2011, 10:26 am 10:26 am

It is common knowledge that Bachmann is a Dispensationallist and Perry could be one.
Just research what that is and you will understand a lot.

Posted by: dfrobichaux | December 17, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am

@MINORKEY1 – How about that cost be your life, your money and your son’s and daughters. I am so sure Israel will appreciate your sacrifice and the meddling the US does …when they can and want to full defend themselves with their over 300 nukes. Iran gets a nuke and what we go to war because they may launch that 1 at a country that has 300. Please try to use your mind and stop rattling on because you think somehow America is the ordained police of the world…this view IS unbiblical.

Posted by: Julie | December 17, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am

What many fail to realize is that Dr. Paul is against abortion and gay marriage but first and foremost he is against federal laws which dictate the manner in which we live our lives.

Being unwilling to start a frivolous war with Iran does not mean you want Iran to have nuclear weapons.

Believing the sovereign nation of Israel can take care of itself does not mean you hate Israel.

Believing the federal government should not be able to dictate what citizens put into their own bodies does not mean you advocate people doing drugs.

This is the difference between Ron Paul and the vast majority of politicians in this country.

He recognizes that a person can be against something without wanting to legislate their specific morality over others.

Dr. Paul is the only historically consistent candidate for the presidency, the only one who has built a lifetime platform of personal liberty and sound economic reasoning.

Posted by: carltonfunkbass | December 17, 2011, 10:33 am 10:33 am

This was a stellar appearance! I was shocked at how fairly he was treated by Leno. It was great television, free from bogus propaganda; and it had to take place on a late-night comedic talk-show…

Posted by: 27Reasons | December 17, 2011, 10:35 am 10:35 am

The best thing Obama could do for his Party is to endorse Hillary for President in 2012.

Posted by: ufos8mycow | December 17, 2011, 10:37 am 10:37 am

@Johnny – Ron is not a “jew hater”. It is clear that he most definitely likes Jews. He understands (as any head of a household should) that it is our sons and daughters that he should consider first! He just does not consider Israel, little America. Israel is a sovereign nation that we have no business partaking in an entangling alliances. Israel hasn’t asked us to take out Iran. If they did Ron would take it before congress, and congress would decide if it was in the American interest to declare war. Obama is doing this for political gain, because he knows that the Iraq war became unpopular and he decided to make it appear like he was in keeping with his campaign promises. Yet, it is in his interest to start another war, because a war-time president has never lost re-election has never lost re-election. Look for Obama to start the war in late 2012. He is fearmongering his way to another term, convincing voters that it is not a good idea to change leaders during a war. By starting a war Obama will deflect voters’ attention away from the economy to another needless and bloody war, all in the desire to hold on to power.

Posted by: Julie | December 17, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Stop beating up on poor Lizz.

POSTED BY: MINORKEY1 | DECEMBER 17, 2011, 10:22 AM===I wasn’t “beating up on poor Lizz”. I was beating up on Nancy…if that’s what YOU want to call it.

Posted by: susan | December 17, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Legalizing drugs? Who cares! You can get drugs anytime you want… It’s legalizing FREEDOM I’m most concerned with. The guy is not only principled, he’s brilliant… he’s gonna win because he’s the only electable candidate on both sides…

Posted by: Joe | December 17, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Isn’t Jay Leno from Massachusetts. What’s Paul trying to say? He had my vote up until this point. Is he downgrading the people of Massachusetts? There’s a lot of liberals here put he just stuck his foot into something he knows nothing about. It’s better to be thought a fool than to open your mouth and reveal all doubt. Someone please enlighten me. Thank you.

Posted by: Rowerboy | December 17, 2011, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Ron Paul does not support federals bans on gay marriage or abortions! Get your facts straight before spreading b.s. propaganda. Dr. Paul believes these issues should be left to the states. He is without a doubt the most gay-friendly republican on the stage. The only abortions he doesn’t really believe in are full term abortions, and planned abortions where a person would only be getting pregnant to extract stem cells from the pregnancy. Ron Paul is the most principled politician this country has seen in the past 50 years!

Posted by: refuse2fail | December 17, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Bachmann scares the bee-jesus right out of me…

Go Ron Go! Get your spine quick, your going ot need it to win!

Posted by: jdude | December 17, 2011, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Ron Paul does not support federals bans on gay marriage or abortions! Get your facts straight before spreading b.s. propaganda. Dr. believes these issues should be left to the states. He is without a doubt the most gay-friendly republican on the stage. The only abortions he doesn’t really believe in are full term abortions, and planned abortions where a person would only be getting pregnant to extract stem cells from the pregnancy. Ron Paul is the most principled politician this country has seen in the past 50 years!

Posted by: 27Reasons | December 17, 2011, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Sorry Minorkey1…I should have addressed it to TWD73 and his comment at protecting Israel at “All costs”

Posted by: Julie | December 17, 2011, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Kinda funny considering that Ron Paul is more than half bigot himself. But anyway, he isn’t going to win anything, other than maybe the “cranky old man of the year award”.
Just sayin’, LOL.

Posted by: Kimberly | December 17, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Ron Paul did Awesome on stage!

Posted by: David | December 17, 2011, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Ron Paul – Another day, another foreign policy knee-slapper. I guess Paul finds the Iranian theocracy in possession of a nuke cute and cuddly. Grrrreat idea – Ron Paul 2012…..

Posted by: Logicsgood5 | December 17, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Bachmann hates anyone who is not “white” or a “Christian”.

Posted by: Chance | December 17, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am

@Lizz -You are so off base that is truly sad. Youthful Ron Paul supporters are smarter than you give them credit for. While it wouldn’t surprise me if there are plenty of them who support RP for his desire for the legalization of drugs (and I’m sure there are plenty of adults who support him for the same reason), all the ones I’ve talked with were more focused on his economic principles, distrust of big government and his desire for personal liberty.

I would think that since you’re probably not of the age that would put you in the “youth of today” group, you’d know well enough to not make broad-sweeping statements based more on your personal emotion rather than facts. If someone made a similar statement about you or a group of people you associate with, how would you feel? I’m pretty sure we all know the answer to that question…

BTW…I’m 43, so don’t go thinking I’m some kid who wants nothing more than to legally smoke a joint in public.

RP for President.

Posted by: Steve S | December 17, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Its sad that Leno gave a better interview to Ron Paul then any other MSM outlet has during this whole election cycle. This 15 minute interview gave a great oversight of his views and beliefs, and agree with him or not I think its important to know where the candidates stand on the issues.

Posted by: RMD343 | December 17, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I am a 57yr. old unemployed plumber and been following Dr. Paul since 1988.He has never backed off in what he knows is the Truth.I’m so proud of all the young people,patriots,who rally around Dr.Paul for it is those folks who will change the ideology of this country. I can feel the wind blowing as the tide is changing,ushering in waves of common sense,hopefully this time turning into a tsunami of freedom that drowns the Satus Quo haters of Democracy !
RON PAUL YALL

Posted by: David Holton | December 17, 2011, 10:53 am 10:53 am

My apologies to Lizz…should have typed Blythe.

Posted by: Steve S | December 17, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Bachmann hates anyone who is not “white” or a “Christian”.

POSTED BY: CHANCE | DECEMBER 17, 2011, 10:49 AM —Obama supporters hate anyone who doesn’t want him to win a second term.

Posted by: darla | December 17, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am

“Bachmann hates anyone who is not “white” or a “Christian”.”
POSTED BY: CHANCE
Laughably false and desperately goofy. Obama “hates” half of his racial heritage. You guess which half. Puzzle it out.

Posted by: Mary Contrary | December 17, 2011, 10:58 am 10:58 am

@Rowerboy – I think RP was only trying to imply that Romney should stick to state-level politics, not the US Presidency. I highly doubt he had any intention of insulting the people of Massachusetts.

Posted by: Steve S | December 17, 2011, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Hey Kimberly, You’re completely misled, to the point that I actually feel bad for people like you. WAKE UP to reality! Ron Paul is the only honest and intelligent candidate; the rest are political tools. Stop posting comments and spreading propaganda; it makes you appear to very very foolish.

Posted by: TheTruthHurts | December 17, 2011, 11:01 am 11:01 am

To Blythe: I disagree. As being part of the “youthful followers”. That is not the only reason why a large amount of the people are voting for Ron Paul. It just goes with his philosophy that people should be allowed to what they want to their bodies. That’s part of it. But anyway, they care about the problems with Iran because they’ve heard about it for so long on television & most of them have friends or relatives who have served over there and all have waited a period of time for those people to come home. They care about that. The youthful followers care about the federal reserve, why do you see loads of Ron Paul supporters voluntarily holding signs & wearing t-shirts & bumperstickers that say “END THE FED”. And the economy…Occupy Wall street.

Posted by: joedonut | December 17, 2011, 11:05 am 11:05 am

You can listen to this man and agree with him or not,You know he is honest.No other politician running in the GOP can say that.Look at his record..

Posted by: james | December 17, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am

THETRUTHHURTS, LOL! Your name actually applies to my post, cos the truth does hurt some. Ron Paul is just the eternally minor, can’t-win candidate for those who want to pose as “different” and “in the know”. Just a silly fad and fetish.
Again…Kinda funny considering that Ron Paul is more than half bigot himself. But anyway, he isn’t going to win anything, other than maybe the “cranky old man of the year award”.
Just sayin’, LOL.

Posted by: Kimberly | December 17, 2011, 11:08 am 11:08 am

I am a retired US Army veteran who served my Country for over 23 years. I will be voting for Dr. Ron Paul and I pray you will vote for him also.

This was an awesome interview by Jay Leno and I will be watching his show again. It is refreshing to see such honesty coming from someone running for the Presidency. Ron Paul for President in 2012.

Posted by: Dave Infinger | December 17, 2011, 11:09 am 11:09 am

This article is worded wrong too. They emphasize that Ron Paul has “gone Hollywood” & made a “rare appearence” on The Tonite show when Jay Leno clearly said while introducing him that he’s been on the show before & likes it when he comes on. Search on Youtube & you’ll find other appearences, I found one from 2007. This wasn’t Ron Paul changing.

Posted by: joedonut | December 17, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Ron Paul is a buffoon, a liar, and a fraud. He wouldn’t have intervened in the Holocaust, because he would say “it’s none of our business.” Therefore, he must hate Jews. Ron Paul is also a 30-year hypocritical career politician who has spent these past three decades feeding at the public trough. I would never vote for Ron Paul. He distorts and perverts the Constitution to suit his own hallucinations, and he is just simply a liar.

Posted by: Jan | December 17, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Searambler “Yet he’s anti abortion and anti gay marriage. So which is it? Does he support individual rights for everyone?”

He believes government should not be in marriage. He thinks it is up to each religion or church to provide marriage and government not to be part of it at all. He is against abortion because in his eyes the unborn baby also has a right.
Ron Paul believes people have a right to do what they want as long as they don’t infringe on another person’s right.
Posted by: Bo | December 17, 2011, 9:41 am.
——————————————————–

Yet he supports the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which is specifically and legislatively anti-gay-marriage. Why support that if he thinks government shouldn’t be in the marriage business? He completely ignores the legal benefits of marriage that are being denied to gay people. His stance here is contradictory.

So he believes that ‘the unborn babies rights’ trump the rights of the mother to choose what she can and cannot do with her own body? His argument is that an unborn person – as in a person who hasn’t been born yet – has the right to be protected from the woman inside whose body it is growing? Then why doesn’t he support outlawing abortion completely, across the country? And why doesn’t he support the ‘personhood at conception’ people who believe that human life starts at the moment of fertilization, and thus things like ‘The Pill’ should be outlawed along with abortion? Again, he’s making contradictory statements here.

In many ways, he is so far to the Right that he’s beyond even the most ardent far-Right zealot. Go far far far far far far Right, then take a few MORE steps to the Right, and there you will find Paul……….

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am

@JDUDE – I agree, Bachmann scares the crap out of me. Funny how in the last debate she said “nothing could be more dangerous than the comments we just heard” regarding RP’s view on Iran, but her comments and ideas will bring about yet another war that we can’t afford, both financially and with the lives of the members of our armed forces.

Posted by: Steve S | December 17, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Funny all the posts proclaiming Dr Paul as crazy and a bigot you have a congress passing the NDAA which basically authorizes the Federal government to detain and torture any American citizen for an indefinite amount of time as it sees fit.
Then you have Politicians spouting off half cooked truths and total lies about IAEA reports concerning Iran who is 1 of a handful of Middle East countries that have signed it,where do you people make this connection from Dr Paul asking for caution and reliable evidence of Iran making weapon grade Uranium that he somehow want’s Iran to be Nuclear capable.God forbid someone actually looks before they leap.
And the Racist card yeesh Dr Paul has and is doing more for all Ethnicities then the entire GOP combined,his view of race is that everyone is EQUAL in his mind there is no division if your a human being then you have your Inalienable rights,which can never be taken away unless your a bunch a fickle mush heads who make political decisions based on today’s talking points.
Do yourself and your Country a favor and look into these matters yourself I guarantee you won’t like what you find.

Posted by: Mark | December 17, 2011, 11:21 am 11:21 am

It seems Americans are forgetting history. In 1970, Madison warned Americans that in the long run, the president might pose the GREATEST danger, especially in time of war. He prophetically, said that individual LIBERTY would lie in abuse of power by Congress and for this reason, the Bill of Rights, barred Congress, not the president or the states from abridging civil liberties. The fulfillment of this prophecy came to comply after the infamous 9/11.
It is not Paul’s invention, the right to defend our civil liberty, but history tells us America needs to abide with the Constitution. We cannot throw wars around the world because we do not like this or that from a particular nation.

Posted by: Norminha | December 17, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Ron Paul did NOT say the Rick Santorum hates gays and muslims. He responded to Jay Leno saying that Rick Santorum “…doesn’t like gays…” (roughly). His response was “and muslims”.

Posted by: Jim McDougall | December 17, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I believe he actually said “She doesn’t like Muslims” the word hate never came out of his mouth. More distortion from the press.

Posted by: Crowe Magnon | December 17, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I believe that Americans are tired of all the WARS and LIES.

Ron Paul has been speaking TRUTH to POWER for 35 years.

It is time for this GREAT NATION to CHANGE COURSE!

This is OUR COUNTRY, it is our DUTY to PRY it out of the HANDS of the ESTABLISMENT, and TAKE IT BACK!

STAND UP and do the RIGHT THING…

Vote for PEACE, LIBERTY and PROSPERITY.

Vote for RON PAUL 2012

Posted by: DollarNearDeath | December 17, 2011, 11:29 am 11:29 am

I’d gladly vote for Ron Paul, except for the fact that the ‘Kingmakers’ who decide for the American people who is or isn’t going to be on the Presidential ballot won’t let me! He might make it as a VP though…

Posted by: HM8432 | December 17, 2011, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Ron Paul is my choice and last night Leno interview was awesome!

Bachmann does hate gays and Muslims – Santorum does as well, is this really a news flash for people…?

The neocon war mongers and their MSM propaganda talking heads are doing everything to discredit him and based on some of the comments here, some of you bough the BS they are selling…

The country wants a President that understands the economy and monetary policy and that person is Ron Paul! If the we listened to him back in 2002 we would have never been in this mess, Ron Paul was right about both the housing and financial crisis and NO other candidate can make that claim.

On Iran, Ron Paul is right again, this is just another Iraq! The MSM is propping up the war propaganda and the neocon talking heads are beating the war drums. FYI, THE COUNTRY IS SICK OF WAR!!!! This isn’t 2007, the country has gotten the joke and we will NOT SUPPORT ANOTHER WAR!

Posted by: Reason | December 17, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am

While I do agree that Ron Paul would easily whip Obama in the debates, he is too old and too Libertarian for most people. But sadly Obama still has HUGE problems. To use a football analogy, it’s looking like Obama will be down about 35 to 3 going into the 4th quarter. Maybe he can pull off a miracle — probably not.

Posted by: NoFlyZone | December 17, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Paul also said Romney is a “good guy.” So, he did not really personally attack Romney. Listen closer to the interview before Paul is cut off by Leno and laughter in talking about Romney.

Posted by: Ok | December 17, 2011, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Well I guess he actually said “she doesn’t like muslims….. she hates muslims” but it appears to be the truth by her actions anyway. Maybe the press should ask her about her views on muslims?

Posted by: Crowe Magnon | December 17, 2011, 11:34 am 11:34 am

What is Dangerous is Bachman thinking she would have the power to blow up another country and be excited about it! Now THAT is scary.

You can see that look in her eyes, like she can’t wait to go and bomb Iran.

Scary stuff, very scary.

Ron Paul is the sensible one.

Posted by: Susan | December 17, 2011, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Spin spin as best you can, you can’t stop him he’s they people’s man!

Posted by: Caleb | December 17, 2011, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Ron had good things to say about Jon Huntsman. Maybe a combo of the two for pres/VP.

Posted by: Ben | December 17, 2011, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I watched the interview and he honestly thought for a minute. He was trying to think of something nice to say but couldn’t. At least he tried.

Posted by: JimBob | December 17, 2011, 11:38 am 11:38 am

I have been following articles concerning Ron Paul for the past few months, and there is a definite increase in them in general, and the comments sections of them are always overwhelmingly pro-Paul. It is anecdotal of course to use that as any measuring stick, but when you combine it with his steady rise in the poll numbers(which only poll ‘likely’ GOP voters), the size of his rallies and the strength of his fundraising-over 3million dollars from small donations in two days!-it all points to a huge swing of support towards him. Imagine if Obama and Paul are in a debate, and the subject of the drug war comes up, and Paul asks the President if drugs made him a bad person and should have been in jail for smoking weed?…An Obama Paul presidential campaign would be the most exciting, distinct and respectful competition in a very long time.

Posted by: ks | December 17, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am

POOR JOURNALISM.
1) the audience was mostly OLDER MIDDLE AGED people for one.
2) Jay gave Dr. Paul the leading statement that Mr. whiney-i-don’t-know-American-history-Santorum “hates gay people.”
3) Paul STATED Mitt was “the Governor of Massachusetts.” PERIOD. No question mark.

Four. Ron Paul is the most stand-up politician out there. And the best thing for this country. Thankfully, people are starting to realized it. I was going to vote for Mitt, but if Paul’s still in it on Super Tuesday, Dr. No is getting my vote.

Posted by: Kelly | December 17, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Ron Paul=nut job!

Posted by: billc | December 17, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am

He’s too FAR RIGHT, I tell you again. But please do nominate him. It’s the best news Obama could get, except for the debates part of it. Thanks LexingtonLady for your excellent posts and for your kind words to me regarding my new Hoveround.
POSTED BY: SEARAMBLER
He would beat Obama, just like the others would (or will) beat Obama. Cheap rhetoric and teleprompted platitudes only go so far, and that is all that Obama has. He’s a one-termer.

Posted by: RiskyBusiness | December 17, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Michelle Bachmann has issued a response to Dr. Paul’s comments on Leno by stamping her foot and saying, “I am a serious candidate.”

Posted by: J.A. Topfke | December 17, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I enjoyed listening to Ron Paul last night and admire his honesty and consistency. I’m glad he mentioned the fact that alcohol is more harmful than marijuana. His remarks about the federal government cracking down on States that legalized the use of medical marijuana and problems with the FDA are very accurate.

I think the DEA should use more resources going after dangerous drug cartels (who think nothing of killing innocent children) instead of arresting critically ill people who use marijuana to alleviate symptoms of their sickness. Of course it’s easier (and safer) to arrest sick people.

Posted by: Joel Johnson | December 17, 2011, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I don’t think I’ve ever heard Bachmann say she hates Muslims, but the way she talks about them has always gave me the impression that she has ‘no love’ for them. I would have to agree with Ron Paul. I think Buchmann hates Muslims, too.

Posted by: Bansters_Rule_The_World | December 17, 2011, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Paul has handled himself fairly well up until the past two debates and the recent statements he made on the Leno Show. He is equal measure of one part far right wing and one part far left wing. An interesting, but very dangerous combination for our possible and future President of the USA. I despise candidates (and even our president) getting down and nasty and accusing people of prejudices to gain points. It is juvenile and degrades the office of president.

Obama has consistently displayed this odious behavior and Paul has now begun to carry on in the same manner.

Paul’s domestic policies are sound, but his foreign policy is dangerous. No, we should not be going to war with Iran or any other country willy nilly. We should work in any way we can to impede Iran’s progress towards obtaining nuclear capability. Paul is absolutely IGNORANT when it comes to the issues of radical Islam. Did I say IGNORANT? Paul made the accusation that we have brought on the wrath of Islamic radicals on our own (and that DOES include 911)!! Paul ought to speak to the President of the Philippines or to the leader of Indonesia…both with heavy Muslim populations (and suffered terrorist attacks) but who work ACTIVELY to keep out the radical Islamic infiltration in their country. Obviously predominantly Muslim countries do not hate their own! Paul is just “Obama Light”. If he does run as a third candidate then I would say he is definitely working to help Obama win (as he agrees with several of Obama’s policies). In fact, it would not surprise me that he is the third candidate desired by the radical Dems to garner a second term for Obama in 2012. Obama will win if Paul runs as the third choice.

Paul is a modern day Neville Chamberlain!!!!

Posted by: littleleers | December 17, 2011, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

RON PAUL libererty and freedom god bless DR RON PAUL 2012

Posted by: frank | December 17, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Did Michelle Bachmann’s dad run off with a Muslim woman when she was a kid? That would explain her deeply rooted hatred of Muslims.

Posted by: mark edward marchiafava | December 17, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

A simple question to all American… why does American government play double standard on nukes? To North Korea, we played democracy card with 6 parties talk, but to Iran, we played war card? Hate might be a too strong word to Michelle, but she and her represented Neocons do have bias against muslin…

Posted by: Neocon_Converts | December 17, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Dr. Paul versus Obama/Newt/Romney 

Competent vs incompetent 
Integrity vs ineptness
Honest vs Dishonest
Truth vs deceit 
Against patriot act vs for patriot act and the extention of Patriot Act 
Freedom vs Martial Law ( HR 1504 )
Against SOPA bill vs for SOPA bill ( back door internet regulations) 
99% vs 1 %
AGAINST ALL WARS/ More Wars Please….next stop Iran
We the people vs corporatocracy  with Obama/ Newt /Romney at helm
Capitalism vs corporate welfare AKA crony capitalism
Against Bailout vs for bailouts ( 23.7 trillion…that is what is call a big Fat corporate welfare cheque, paid by us the tax payer) 
Audit the Fed / Absolutely NOT.
campaign donations ordinary people/ campaign donations Wall Street

He will cut his presidential salary to 39,500 USD  IF ELECTED. 
He was never taken congressional pension and any government junket
He has treated his patients for free rather than take Medicare and Medicaid.

Ron Paul wins by a landslide .

Posted by: zec zeci | December 17, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

@JoeDonut…you are incorrect to a degree, sir. You are correct in saying that Ron Paul would not have intervened in Europe at first in WWII. However, Germany did declare war on us and were already attacking us by the time they did declare war on us, so there was no doubt that we would wind up fighting them, but we would have just never intervened unless we were threatened.

Secondly, to deduce from the fact that he would have done what he could to abstain from entering WWII that he hates Jews is just completely ridiculous. Besides, he is the only candidate who wants to allow Israel to be truly sovereign and do what it deems necessary to protect itself and not be beholden to us.

Thirdly, you’re so concerned about the holocaust and our intervention, but what about all the genocides and millions of people slaughtered in various African countries. Why aren’t you crying out for intervention there? Why is it is this one instance so important when compared to all the other genocides that have occurred and continue to occur in our time? You should be criticizing every president since a long time ago for your position. We can’t afford to be policeman of the world anymore. You tell me how we can afford it with 15 trillion in debt without continually just printing money and debasing the currency further while making things more expensive to the point where we print more money and then I might even dare to listen to an argument you have. However, the fact is…you’re pretty much incorrect about everything you said.

Posted by: John S. | December 17, 2011, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

It’s popular to talk tough, the public likes that. The problem is in this nuclear age one or two miscalculations can kill millions of people. Compare these republican candidates to John Kennedy who was cool and thoughtful during the Cuban missile crisis. These republican candidates just don’t measure up, President Obama does.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 17, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

There is nothing he says that he would regret. He is well aware of every word coming out of his mouth and its meaning and its consequences. The question is will voters be smart enough to understand his words because sometimes he uses multi syllable words that the American Public have a tough time comprehending.

Posted by: Adam | December 17, 2011, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I just want to point out that you have blatantly misquoted Dr. Paul in your article and it’s title to mislead the general public as to what he actually said. Dr. Paul, as evidenced by the video posted in the article, clearly said that she “does not like” Muslims and that is far different than the word “hate.” I feel for the integrity of the Journalism profession you should correct your mistake and blatant misquoting of Dr. Paul.

Posted by: Mitch | December 17, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I stand corrected I missed the little “she hates muslims” comment at first. Either way it was pretty funny

Posted by: Mitch | December 17, 2011, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

@ Lizz Really?!, that’s your reason for why Ron Paul has such a young following- because Ron Paul wants to remove the Federal Ban on drugs? Yes Lizz, every young person just wants to get high and watch the world burn. The youth don’t mind seeing their futures dwindle and their rights disappear- just as long as they can get high. In actual reality though, most Ron Paul supporters focus on issues about ending the Federal Reserve, stopping US foreign interventionism, decreasing the size of government, and repealing laws that are unconstitutional. And as you should already know, federal drug laws violate constitutional law. If we refer back to our “Bill of Rights” the 10 amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Do me favor, because it sounds like you’ve been very thorough in your research (of both American history and Ron Paul’s campaign): I would like for you to give me an in-depth review of Ron Paul’s stances on the issues, including his reasoning for them. I look forward to reading your reply

Posted by: swlma | December 17, 2011, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Islamic or whatever, the problem is conservatism. Wheather the Mulah’s or our fundamentalists they are all conservatives. It is laughable one conservative against another–

Posted by: dabu | December 17, 2011, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

@tmferretti…so wait…let me get this straight….Obama who continually pushes us towards war with Iran and enters in several other military engagements unconstitutionally and casually is being thoughtful and cool? You can’t be serious…

Ron Paul is the only one talking about diplomacy and free trade to calm all these war like situations and to avoid war to every extent possible. I don’t hear Obama acting like any Cuban Missles Crisis Kennedy…all I see is a Liberal Bush…same policies except Obama likes the welfare state.

Ron Paul is the only one being thoughtful to try and avoid war and to create friends rather than make enemies. Friends are more likely to be responsible and accountable to conversation than enemies. The more we push Iran to war, the more likely they will stop giving two you know what’s if we ask of something from them. Which is exactly, what your “cool and thoughtful” Obama is doing.

Posted by: John S. | December 17, 2011, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Ruin Paul is the master of half truthes and half lies and anything else in between is utter nonsense. As far as I’m concerned he and Bachman are equals in stupidity.

Posted by: cycnus001 | December 17, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I love all the bloggers that take his comments so literally. He was clearly not being serious when he said those things, and even if he was, they’re completely true. So… I don’t really understand what people are freaking out about. Ron Paul 2012!

Posted by: Jas | December 17, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

She’s a lawyer.. O mean a liar. She lies everyday.
I think it’s the meds she takes for the migraines

Posted by: Angelo S | December 17, 2011, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” — Ron Paul

Only Ron Paul, of all the presidential candidates of both major parties, has repeatedly spoken out clearly and forcefully against the belligerent war propaganda and calculated lies in the bipartisan lead up to war with Iran, against the bipartisan campaign for punitive sanctions against Iran, and against further covert operations to destabilize the fragile geopolitical situation in the Mideast. He is not afraid to speak truth to power.

The principled constitutionalist and noninterventionist Paul was right from the start about our disastrous preemptive imperial wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, right from the start about the destructive ‘blowback’ fomenting more hatred directed towards America, right from the start about the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies creating the housing bubble which led to the 2008 financial meltdown, right from the start about the War on Drugs, the USA Patriot Act and the TSA imposing a police state upon the American people.

Ron Paul is the most decisive, authoritative, and substantive consistent conservative candidate on the crucial national security issues facing our nation. Americans have always rooted for the heroic underdog, the principled David facing down Goliath. By standing out from the pack of neocon clone candidates, Paul once again proved his forthright courage, his dedication to first principles, and to the United States Constitution and the rule of law.

Never forget that these same duplicitous chickenhawk jihadists (Gingrich, Romney, Santorum, Bachmann, and Perry) beat the propaganda war drums of “weapons of mass destruction” in the failed war in Iraq. The American people know the bitter tragedy of war. They are tired of being lied to about these futile no-win conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is their sons and daughters, husbands and wives, who were seriously maimed, irreparably disabled, and killed, never to return physically or psychologically intact as they were when they marched off to these egregious follies.

Ron Paul is our Cicero, our defender of the republic, a statesman of unblemished character and principled judgment. The twelve-term congressman has for decades courageously spoken out for a conservative foreign policy based upon a strong national defense of the essential core principles of liberty and justice as established by the Framers, a defense of the territorial integrity of the United States and its national borders. Peace, prudential diplomacy, international trade and commerce, and the free exchange of ideas are the key elements to a constitutional foreign policy. Only by setting an exemplary example to the world will the United States of America once again become “the exceptional nation,” that “shining city upon a hill.”

But Ron Paul is first and foremost a realist. America is financially bankrupt due to decades of reckless, irresponsible fiscal and monetary policies pursued by the Fed, the Congress, and the Executive branch of the state. Paul’s measured conservative program of strategic disengagement from the unconstitutional pre-emptive wars of the past decade, coupled with a serious analytical reassessment of the imperial over-reach of 900 military bases in 130 nations, is the only wise course dictated by this unsustainable debt situation.

Posted by: charles | December 17, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Ron Paul’s got my vote again! It is a fact that Michelle Bachmann lied about the IAEA report! Why isn’t the media jumping all over that? Cowards. The propaganda she spews out can easily equate to her hating them. It is well known that war causes misery for many and that’s what she wants. More war! Well Merry Christmas! Ron Paul has more patriotism than all of Congress combined! He has been consistently supporting our supreme law, the Constitution for 30+ years! Problem is most Americans are so brainwashed from the TV and media that they don’t know why countries prosper. They don’t prosper from BIG government but from limited government! Ron Paul 2012 for president or prepare for extremely harder times! RON PAUL 2012!

Posted by: Vince | December 17, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The author of this article is not a true journalist. After watching the show I feel like this article spins the events with negative connotations that were not there. Jason Volack you are an amateur.

Posted by: Badjournalism | December 17, 2011, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Our Nation is bankrupt and Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who addresses this issue.

Ron Paul serves on the House Committees on Foreign Affairs and Financial Services, and on the Joint Economic Committee. He is the chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology, where he has been an outspoken critic of American foreign and monetary policy.

Dr. Ron Paul served as a flight surgeon in the United States Air Force from 1963 to 1965 and then in the United States Air National Guard from 1965 to 1968.

Dr. Paul is clearly the most qualified candidate to tackle our Nations critical economic and foreign affair issues. While most people foolishly believe the corporate media when they say Dr. Paul is crazy or a dangerous isolationist, the rest of the top tier candidates like Romney, Perry, Gingrich and Obama are a bunch of clowns who receive their funds from major donors from Wall Street and a greedy military industrial complex. These ignorant people who believe Fox, CBS, CNN and the lot, are the real danger and our end all for America.

Ron Paul has warned his supporters for three decades and more about the dangers of a fraudulent fractional reserve banking system in the hands of private central bankers, and no one can legitimately argue any longer that those concerns have not been justified.

So are American’s educated enough to realize that our monetary system is rigged?… Are they educated enough to realize that most candidates from both parties are owned?

Ron Paul receives more financial contributions from active duty vets than all the other candidates combined. Why is this? They know that Ron Paul is the best solution for our National Defense, though the establishment media is trying to make him look like a kook who would hurt national security. We need to defend our borders and give all these National Guard troops who are on their 3rd and 4th tours of duty a break. What if there was a real war in the near future? Our military is already at the breaking point from wars started to help banks and oil companies. We need an agenda to help repair America. Vote for Ron Paul 2012!!!!

Posted by: boss | December 17, 2011, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

As an person brought up in the Catholic faith, I now hate Catholics!

Posted by: blind spot | December 17, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

JOHN S

The President thinks before he speaks on any subject, be it the economy or foreign policy. He knows what the President says matters, to us and the world in general. He doesn’t have the luxury of shooting from the hip.

The republican candidates, except Paul and Huntsman, have a habit of saying things they can’t back up or know nothing about. It makes them look like spoiled juvenile delinquents. As I said, we wouldn’t be having this discussion if one of them had to deal with the Russians in the 1960s.

Posted by: tmferretti | December 17, 2011, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

WHY ARE THE ONLY ARTICLES AND MEDIA COVERAGE FOR RON PAUL TRYING TO BASH AND MISQUOTE HIM??? RON PAUL IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE THAT CAN BEAT OBAMA…

Posted by: THETRUTH | December 17, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Dr. Ron Paul has my vote because he loves America. He is not like the other republican candidates who bow down to AIPAC (Arrogant Israelis Puppets And Cronies). America does not need Israel or Netanyahu to come to Washington and tell our “elected officials” what to think of the world. Israel is one ally that American does not need or want because it cost us too much to support her.

Posted by: American Taxpayer | December 17, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

i agree with ron paul. i dont like these wars, and i dont want them for my children and grand children. i really dislike newt and all the other people. i agree with him on the drug issue and i dont use drugs.

Posted by: gabriella | December 17, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

When Ron Paul gets rejected yet again by the Republicans as their choice for candidate, what will all you RP supporters do? (Besides blame Obama, of course). This is Paul’s third run at the White House, first as a Libertarian, then as a Republican. He has been soundly and forcefully rejected thus far. What makes anyone believe the Republicans will choose him THIS time?

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Searambler even if he is not elected his purpose has been served.. most of the Republican candidates have taken on bits and pieces of Paul’s view. He has single handedly changed the narrative of this race. He was talking about all the same things in 2008. 4 years later and he was right all along. The establishment hates him. It’s either Paul or more war, welfare, and nanny state. I do not need the government minding my business.

Posted by: wehadbetterwakeup | December 17, 2011, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Ron Paul is the most senable of the bunch. The others are preaching hate, fear, and suspicion while Paul stays on the point. If he has any fear he doesn’t show it. Bauchman and Santoriam can be intimadated easiy. Not Paul. He just keeps on Keeping On.

Posted by: Lewis | December 17, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Ron Paul is absolutely correct. Can you imagine if she made the remarks about Jews that she does about Muslims? This is political propaganda, and it is being used to promote public support for continual undeclared wars in the Middle East.

It worked for the Nazis.

Posted by: Gregory | December 17, 2011, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

This is all Volack and ABC have now – misreporting on Ron Paul via subjective hyperbole?! Volack on Paul’s remark on Bachmann: “The comment even left the audience and host Jay Leno momentarily stunned.” Readers of this article should check how the video to judge for yourselves how “stunned” they were.

Posted by: stephen knight | December 17, 2011, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Buckman is on a Intelligence subcommittee. As all ‘defense’ committee members, they are there because that where the money is. Anyone after being on a ‘Defense’ committee that supports the military industrial complex has a job for life. The biggest swinging door is the Military Industrial Complex.
Under the existing paradigm of the Autocrats, whether it is the DEA, FBI or any Department, it has been proven that the assigned Authority includes doing “Whatever”, Literally “Whatever” is in the best interest of their mandate. This Authority is passed to them by the next higher ‘Authority’. The only time this is apparent or is openly admitted by the authorizing authority is when suit is brought where the authorizing must state so.
Literally one has to sue a govt. agency to admit the truth, as it is within the authority to lie, to serve it’s mandate.
Lying is not illegal. It is,or is not authorized. It can be embarrassing, if done under oath and chased through court they can be held liable.
Buckman was not under oath-lying is not illegal.

Posted by: Mike D | December 17, 2011, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

wehadbetterwakeup | December 17, 2011, 1:40 pm post ——– LOL! Yeah, OK, whatever. Ron Paul is the Nostradamus of our time. Got it……..

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

@Lizz I’m 25 year old and a Paul supporter and I dont care about drugs (or do them), I care about the federal government stomping all over my civil liberties and starting endless wars which MY generation will pay for. It also appear we will not get social security given the current state of our economy and the Neo-conservative big government thinking that permeates in the minds of most Americas. Maybe you should wake up and take a look around you, this country is in trouble and more of the status quo isn’t gonna fix that. All of the other candidates are just like Obama… bought by corporate interest.

Posted by: Stephen Austin | December 17, 2011, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

WEHADBETTERWAKEUP | DECEMBER 17, 2011, 1:40 PM ===I’m not a big RP supporter but you are correct. Paul has managed to bring a lot of hot button issues to the front that BOTH sides want to ignore or don’t want to give a straight answer to. Its a shame we can’t put both him and Obama on the grill and see who turns out crispy…….and I’m betting it wouldn’t be Paul.

Posted by: jasper | December 17, 2011, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Searambler, in reply to your comments-

Ron Paul is a realist.

He supports people living their life in a wholistic and prosperous way. But he opposes the ‘War on Drugs’ because it has been an abject failure. More people in jail than ever on petty drug crimes, yet more drugs than ever on the streets. Our justcie system can hardly keep up. Taxpayers spend trillions to control something that cannot be controlled. Like prohibition — the ‘War on Drugs’ has accomplished nothing but has cost a lot.

The founding father warned us about foreign entanglement. They cost much and benefit us little. Does anyone know why we fought in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq? To support ‘Democracy’… nice buzz word, but what does it really mean? The bottom line is that we are not more free, but we are much more in debt.

And being a debt slave means you have less freedom and less security. Now we have the ‘War on Terror’. It has morphed into an assault on the Contitution and citizen rights.

Our military promises to gaurd against enemies both Foreign and Domestic. The greatest threat now comes via the Domestic assualt on citizen rights as our globalists beholden Congress push the agenda of their corporatist / military industrial complex / banker sponsors.

In fact, Mitt Romney is having multi-million dollar fundraisers with Goldman and the NY financial establishement as I write this post.

The system is corrupt and broken. Ron Paul cares about America and is not a sell-out. He offers real change and a break from the polluted D.C. establishment system.

Ron Paul 2012 for a sound and strong America. Ron Paul will answer to the citizens of the USA and not to the globalist elite.

Posted by: 2ctruth | December 17, 2011, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

There is one issue of vital importance thst should overshadow all others. The US Senate voted that US citizens can be arrested and detained without trial indefinitely without a lawyer in thr recently passed Defense Authorization Act. Ron Paul and the ACLU are both against this but 17 Democrats voted for it and weak livered Obam will likely protedt and then sign it. Your views on maariage, war, abortion will mean nothing fro inside a cell in a Federal detention facility far from friends and family. I voted for Obama but he scares me on civil liberties. So do the rest of the gop. If you value liberty, vote for Ron Paul.

Posted by: Mkm45 | December 17, 2011, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Ron Paul would be a great President! The far right hate him because he doesn’t like bogus wars and the far left hates him because he likes freedom and the Constitution. He has been the most consistent politician I have ever seen. I think America should give him a shot at running this country. No one could do as much damage as Bush and Obummer. Ron has my vote. I don’t see anyone even close to his stature that is running.

Posted by: Franko | December 17, 2011, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Bachmann’s right because Islam is the #1 threat to the American way of life, other than the deficit. Muslim’s murder and maim all the time in Africa (news channels won’t report it, or cover it up by calling it sectarian violence). In Paris, France there are 751 sectors where the police won’t go because the Muslim gangs are too dangerous. Islamics are sweet and friendly now, but when they takeover, Islamics get violent, deadly, and brutal. They have just finished with massacres in Egypt and Nigeria. Massacres go on all the time in Sudan. Our grandkids are going to fearful everyday about Islamic on Christian violence. If you take time to look at facts, then Bachmann is clearly the bold vision for success for the United States.

Posted by: LogicNotHuff | December 17, 2011, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Why does anyone care about people being gay or abortions? I have my views and they are my views which everyone is entitled to. I’m pro life but I wouldn’t write a law saying this is what everyone has to believe in and conform too. If you want to have an abortion go ahead and do it I may not agree with you and I may try and talk you out of it but I’m not going to force you not to. And gay marriage really? If you really want to protect marriage you would be crying bloody murder all over tv about how many single female soldiers get married just to get into the military….and how many soldiers get married for the extra money of being married in the military. Ron Paul has his views and his beliefs but he wouldn’t force it down your throat with legislation like Bachmann and Santorum

Posted by: Scott | December 17, 2011, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Why do a few of these comments state the Ron Paul is against gay marriage? As a libertarian, Ron Paul may be against gay marriage, for HIMSELF, but he emphatically supports the rights of others to do as they please in their personal lives, as long as they don’t harm others. When Paul discusses marriage, he’s referring to the religious institution, and believes that government at the federal level, and ultimately the state level, should stop sanctioning marriages at all, because to do so is to entwine religion with government. He’s FINE with the contractual aspects of marriage as agreements between consenting adults, of any gender combination, to share property, provide for children, etc. His thinking on this issue may at first seem a confusing to those unfamiliar with libertarian philosophy, but it is logically consistent, and once you learn that libertarians view as essential the role of government to protect the rights of individuals to contract with each other, you realize what a force against the tyranny of the majority a President Paul would be.

Here’s a quote from his book, Liberty Defined:
“In a free society…all voluntary and consensual agreements would be recognized.” He adds, “There should essentially be no limits to the voluntary definition of marriage.”

Posted by: rupert | December 17, 2011, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Ron Paul is probably the only Republican candidate I would not vote for in the general election should he win the primary. As much as I dislike Obama, I think Paul would be a disaster. I am very much for small government, but I do believe there is a role and a place for government. Paul, he is an anarchist who want to abolish everything instead of shrinking it to sane levels. Paul is a disaster. I hope this is the last time he runs.

Posted by: George | December 17, 2011, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Tough love — the promotion of self-help. When you hear Dr. Paul say that we should not provide aid to other countries because it weakens them, he’s absolutely right. Example: If parents coddle their teenagers or adult children they become dependent on the assistance and they soon become unable/unwilling to manage on their own. Seems to me that it only stands to reason that it works the same way on a global scale. This aid also leads to a master/slave relationship — those that pay your way have the say.

Those that keep bringing up abortion should realize that the mother is carrying another individual that has individual rights. When we can feel free to take those rights from the unborn then rulers feel free to take those same rights from the rest, after all you have consented to the taking of another’s life. But some insist that they can do what they want making this an issue better left to the individual states. If you live in a state that has abortion laws you don’t agree with, you are free to vote with your feet by moving to a place that is more in tune to your beliefs. The same goes for gay marriage it’s not a federal government issue.

I want to warn those of you that feel the need to categorize everyone into nice neat little groups such as gay, lesbian, transgendered, african-american, italian-american, mentally ill, 1%, the 99er’s and so on, there are certain organizations that want a “perfect society” and this classification system only helps to show differences among us. We don’t need special laws, the ones we have work in all cases we don’t need further definitions such as reverse racism. After all racism is racism and a hate crime is a crime no matter how you look at it. As history shows those that are deemed less than perfect are at some point exterminated. You may feel special now but how special are you going to feel when your group is the one being hunted? It’s time to take a stand for individual rights as protected by the Constitution.

Watch out for gradualism and nudging as small infringements often escalate into something very few wanted. Think TSA.

Ron Paul in 2012 or risk the consequences.

Posted by: Kate | December 17, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Something to remember for those scared of “States Rights”…

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” – Thenth Amendment

Here is the deal, the PEOPLE are the SOVEREIGN (look up what that is), we give the states AND the Fed permission to do our business. Government is a nessasary evil, but if it gets too big it TAKES YOUR SOVEREIGNTY and claims it as their own. When our constitutional government actually is fully realized in the hearts and minds of the people we might not have these tiresome petty argumetns about drugs, gays, race, ect because we will be FREE. You see, the REAL DEAL about America that was our founders final victory over tyrants is that our RIGHTS are not GIVEN by a STATE or CONSTITUTION, all the constitution reconizes is that we have our rights because we are thinking humans, have life, and can control our own destiny. If you believe it is because of God or by chance of sentience, it doesn’t matter, the fact is a STATE did not CREATE you and you have the right to live as you please as long as you do not have someone else (violate their rights) by damaging or taking their LIFE, PROPERTY, and LIBERTY. Simpley put, everyone is complainig and the founders found the key to world peace. Just too many cynics and partisan racist zombies these days. ALL PEOPLE OF ALL NATIONS ARE FREE, CLAIM YOUR FREEDOM. WE THE PEOPLE ARE CEASAR, GIVE CEASAR HIS DUE!!! Peace, Love, Understanding.

Posted by: Mythic Mystic | December 17, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Most posts made by anti-RonPaul people are comical. They spew common perceptions created by MSM that are completely bogus. Anti-RonPaul people lack substance and refuse to open themselves up to reality. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH! Quit letting fools like Billy O and Anderson Cooper tell you what to think. Try to make use of your brains people. Ron Paul is the only honest and capable candidate, period.

Posted by: refuse2fail | December 17, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

George, Congratulations on have the complete inability to use your own brain. Good job.

Posted by: refuse2fail | December 17, 2011, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

I believe that Obama is a self-loathing Muslim, although he frantically strains to disguise it, which only causes a whole new set of problems.

Posted by: Obama LOL | December 17, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

HATE = INTENSE DISLIKE.

Bachmann is a hater in every sense of the word.

Bachmann would bomb the hell out out of Iran or Syria, if provided the chance. She voted for the Patriot Act, and she voted for the treasonous NDAA, so she has no problems treating Muslims and Americans like terrorists, because as an anti-American Muslim hater — she hates Muslims AND Americans.

Posted by: Zzz | December 17, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

ZZZ, you are more than a little nutty. Work on it.

Posted by: Joseph | December 17, 2011, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

People, its time. If you’re sick of empty suits, sick of polished speakers who don’t believe or care in their platform other than to get and stay in power, if you’re sick of giant government spending, come on over. The water is fine. RON PAUL REVOLUTION.

Posted by: stevejones | December 17, 2011, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

2ctruth wrote, “Ron Paul is a realist. He supports people living their life in a wholistic and prosperous way.”

So he DOESN’T support someone who wants to live, say, a hedonistic life? He only supports people who subscribe to HIS personal views on how people should lead their lives? Is that what you’re saying? That he is intolerant of people who don’t live their lives the way he wants them to? I just want to make sure I understand his position here…..

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

There is one issue of vital importance that should overshadow all others. The US Senate voted that US citizens can be arrested and detained without trial indefinitely without a lawyer in the recently passed Defense Authorization Act. Ron Paul and the ACLU are both against this but 17 Democrats voted for it and weak livered Obama will likely protest and then sign it. Posted by: Mkm45 | December 17, 2011, 2:03 pm

OK, couple of points. First, you said 17 Democrat senators voted for it, and it passed. So how many Republicans voted for it? Most? Why didn’t you mention that at all in your post? You need to check your facts, because your numbers are way off anyway. The fact is, only nine Senators voted AGAINST the bill. It passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, which is shocking in and of itself. Second, have you ever heard of this? “Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004) was a U.S. Supreme Court decision reversing the dismissal of a habeas corpus petition brought on behalf of Yaser Esam Hamdi, a U.S. citizen being detained indefinitely as an “illegal enemy combatant.” The Court recognized the power of the government to detain enemy combatants, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial judge.” THAT is from the Supreme Court in 2004. So your understanding of what is actually in the Defense Bill that you cite is, well, suspect………….

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

“Most posts made by anti-RonPaul people are comical. They spew common perceptions created by MSM that are completely bogus.” claims Refuse2Fail.
—————————————————————————————–

Such as? Funny how you fail to give even a single example to back up your claim. So, what is one “common perception created by the MSM that is completely bogus.” Give the perception, show that it was indeed created by the media (and not just reported by them), and then for the win, show how it is factually bogus.

Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 17, 2011, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Paul’s got a point. It seems like Bachmann, Santorum, and Gingrich are all in lockstep with the terrorism-inciting ultra-Islamophobic fringe of the blogosphere. Is there really any difference between Bachmann, Gingrich, Santorum, and that Islamophobic terrorist from Norway Anders Behring Breivik? Like Breivik, the Islamophobic wing of the GOP is in lockstep with the Pamela Gellers of the world.

It is long past time that Muslim-hating bigots were marginalized in our society. It should be just as unacceptable to hold Islamophobic views as it is to hate any other ethnic group.

I think it is amusing, albeit sad, that Fox News has been spreading lies about Ron Paul. I’m familiar with Paul’s views on 9/11 and I know for a fact that he is not a 9/11 conspiracy theorist. Fox News has been distorting his views in recent days by using statements of his in favor of a new 9/11 investigation (presumably without the kinds of political interference that the 1st investigation had to deal with) to claim that he is a conspiracy theorist. Fox News seems to be in a panic mode since Ron Paul is probably going to win the Iowa caucuses. One Fox News “journalist” even says that a Ron Paul win would “discredit” the Iowa Caucus. No wonder studies have repeatedly found that regular Fox News viewers are less informed than people who don’t watch news at all.

I may not agree with Ron Paul all of the time, but he is easily the best candidate running for president, so I hope he wins.

Posted by: Anonymous | December 17, 2011, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

I am voting for you Ron Paul.. you are the only one that makes sense. Thank you
Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: mike cohen | December 17, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

““Young people are principled,” said Paul adding that “after a while you get mixed up.” ~~~~~~~ And
unlike all those OTHER people who’ve “gotten mixed up” when it comes to principles, he’s the
obvious exception to his own rule, right???? Gotta love that “if you support me, you’re principled and
if you don’t, you’re mixed up” attitude.*POSTED BY: MINORKEY1 *****Elected 12 times…sounds
like a career politician to me.

Posted by: michael | December 17, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Finally someone that speaks the truth. Ron Paul has my vote!

Posted by: Lisa Andersson | December 17, 2011, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

I believe in very little anymore but the one thing I absolutely believe is that Ron Paul will bring us back from the brink of catastrophe. I believe that once he pulls the curtains open on the FED and D.C. politics the American people will finally realize what fools they’ve been and they will never let things go back to the way they are now. President Paul. I like the sound of it

Posted by: Deet Walters | December 17, 2011, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Ron Paul has my vote in the primary. And, he also has my swing state vote in the general whether he’s on the ballot or not.

I’ve never in my life heard a political candidate ever say so many of my own thoughts out loud until this election cycle. He’s a blessing to our country.

Posted by: Tommy | December 17, 2011, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

It is NOT outrageous to state she “hates Muslims”. Replay that video clip of her angry look on her face. It was absolutely hateful. Apparently, her really hateful look penetrated to the core of Ron Paul as she GLARED at him.

The candidates who believe in preemptive war believe it’s okay to kill thousands of innocent Muslim women & children, all for the sake of killing a few “terrorists”. That is morally wrong.

If they can’t live with a policy of AMERICAN PROTECTIONISM which is what this candidate Ron Paul advocates, there is something really wrong with them. I would not be surprised if they support the NDAA egregious, unpatriotic, bill where the Military & President can nab any US citizen & throw them in a concentration camp, at the same time breaking the 5th amendment which enables all of us the “right to due process”. NOPE. I’m sure these types are all for that bill. These people don’t understand what the meaning of “representation” means anymore.

All this WAR HAWK talk is just making the Republican Party look extreme & will drive all Democrats, including the moderate ones, right into the hands of OBAMA.

Posted by: Susan | December 17, 2011, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Correction to my 4:18 post: the defense spending bill passed the Senate 86-13. Thirteen senators voted against it, not nine like I stated. “Oops”…………

Posted by: Searambler | December 17, 2011, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Go Dr Paul! This Iran fear mongering is Iraq all over again. Dr Paul was right then and he’s right again!

Posted by: JP | December 17, 2011, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Just another day of Ron Paul getting attacked for telling the truth and only the truth. It looks to me however that the telling the clear truth, following the Constitution, and respecting individual rights is becoming more popular. It’s easy to see this from the fact that Dr. Paul has an incredible and ever increasing amount of loyal support from true conservatives.

Posted by: Rob | December 17, 2011, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Bachmann and Santorum are Neocon Wannabes. They are playing to the fear-mongering, war-mongering right who are puppets of the military industrial complex. Mainstream media makes so much profit off of war, so they are all for supporting delusional talk about dropping bombs on Iran. Checkout H.W. Bush’s foreign policy on Iran. H.W. Blocked Israeli air strike on Iranian Nuclear Facilities citing ‘Blowback’ and ‘Blocking the Straight of Hormuz’. Vote Ron Paul.

Posted by: Bryan | December 17, 2011, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Haha this is too funny because I am Muslim and I agree with Ron Paul. I would be terrified if I was locked in a room with Bachman. The things that come out of that woman’s mouth are pure hatred and instill fear in an attempt to justify spreading hatred. So if it was even a question, or if this article was just looking for a more “politically correct” statement, Yes. Bachman hates Muslims, it is basically a fact at this point.

Posted by: Sadeq | December 17, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I love the two opposing views Ron Paul generates.

On one side, you have those that think Ron Paul is crazy. On the other, you have those that think he’s the only sane candidate.

Here are the questions Americans need to ask themselves:

1) Should we go to war with Iran?
2) Should we keep passing trillion dollar bills to stimulate the economy and keep bailing out those that created our current financial problems?
3) Are there any instances where a bigger government is more beneficial than a smaller government?

If you answered no to all of the above, Ron Paul is the only choice.

Posted by: RCS | December 17, 2011, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Sadeq;

Advocating a strong position on Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons does NOT mean one hates muslims. That is just infantile thinking. The greatest killer of Iranians in the history of the Iranian state was Saddam Hussein and he did it with a muslim army. You will now counter with the preposterous claim that the US armed him. I’ll wait.

Posted by: Marc | December 17, 2011, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

i am 22 and a ron paul supporter. to the person who said the young people only support him because of his views on legalizing drugs you could not be more wrong. i have never done drugs in my life, and i do not plan to if they are legalized (on a federal level mind you). i support ron paul because he understands the roots of our economic crisis (predicting the housing bubble as early as 2003), and he understands that almost all modern wars started by the united states are completely unconstitutional and uncalled for in the name of national defense.

Posted by: adam | December 17, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Ron Paul just took down bachmann, gained ground control and pummeled her into submission.

Posted by: Ben H | December 17, 2011, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

@MARC:

i agree that advocating an interventionist position on iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons does not mean bachman hates muslims. i also wish paul wouldn’t have said that. i do however believe he is by far the best candidate for president. who do you believe is best candidate?

Posted by: adam | December 17, 2011, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Funny, it’s clearly apparent what is happening now. Ron Paul has been a slow and
steady tortoise in this race, slowly gaining momentum. The hare(brained) candidates
skyrocket in popularity and then plummet to a crash landing. People like Huckabee,
Sean Hannity, and other mainstream media pundits are now trying to discredit Iowa
votes as they see Gingrich reach his peak and begin to feel the fast drop he’s now
starting to take.

Ron Paul has a solid philosophy of upholding the Constitution in an effort to fight for
peace, prosperity, and liberty. Ron Paul opposes the undeclared wars, the corrupt
Patriot Act, the new NDAA bill, the privacy invasion from the TSA, and the Federal
Reserve system. People are looking for a Grinch alternative, and with all the others
down in the polls, with Paul now TIED for first in Iowa, we will see the rise of Ron
Paul. The media would like you all to now ignore the Iowa coverage since Paul will
likely win or come in 2nd, and they will be quick to downplay that as well.

Posted by: Mike Ikeo | December 17, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I would proudly vote for Ron Paul.

Posted by: beaches24 | December 17, 2011, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Anybody but Obama (or Bachman or Santorum) but I would love the opportunity to vote for someone with true intergrity (for the first time in my life) instead of voting for the lesser of two evils. The more I watch and listen to Ron Paul, the more I feel that he is the right person for this country at this time.

Posted by: beaches24 | December 17, 2011, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I too like Ron Paul, BUT….HE IS TOO OLD….76 yrs old is too old to be president of this United States.
And that is one of the reasons he is not afraid to speak what he believes. Age has its priviledges, and telling the truth is one of them. Remember, electing a president, is not electing the whole Congress. And, they are a very important part of the American policies that are put into place….and what have caused us some of the problems we face today. So, sayiing that, just think….would you want your grandfather to be President? Is he too old…then so is Ron Paul. I hate saying it, but that is the way I feel.

Posted by: ann maccormick | December 17, 2011, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Ron Paul is a principled man but he is also a crank. Libertarian and isolationism are nonsensical concepts in light of what history has shown us. What did we get when there was no EPA or FDA? Corporations polluting without consequence and drug manufacturers offering useless or poisonous products without fear. Capitalism cannot survive in any recognizable form without governments and unions to curb its excesses. And I’ll take the Federal Reserve any day of the week over the chaos the gold standard foisted on this country in the 19th century.

Posted by: FastEddie | December 17, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

There’s no way American Voters would elect Ron Paul because he speaks the truth…..we want another liar because that’s what we’re used to.

Posted by: blind spot | December 17, 2011, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I think she hates any group she doesn’t understand. Unfortunately; that’s a lot of groups. She’s naive and misguided. She doesn’t have the depth to be president. I don’t think she even has the depth to be a congresswoman for the district she represents. Why do districts elect people like her? I just don’t get it. I think she is hardworking and persistent. What’s even scarier are the people that DO think she is qualified to represent her our also misguided and naive. With all of her good intentions, you can’t serve these people well with the limited and finite perspective she holds on all views. I.E: gay people, gays in the military, the military(itself), foreign policy, the environment, etc… The list goes on and on.

Posted by: JWC | December 17, 2011, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Paul is against the FED, Newt is over-FED. Thank you Jay Leno.

Posted by: Java McPhearson | December 17, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

“…we want another liar because that’s what we’re used to.”
POSTED BY: BLIND SPOT
Nah, I disagree. I believe Obama will lose, and lose badly.

Posted by: Rudolph | December 17, 2011, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

fast eddie – people always use that isolationist stuff against Ron Paul. That’s not completely true. He did vote in congress to go after the people who attacked us on 9-11. He simply doesn’t believe in starting wars. He believes in using all those diplomats we have all over the world.

Posted by: sheba | December 17, 2011, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Ann Maccormick – If Ron Paul is too old then Ronald Reagan was also too old and look at all the people who voted for him and still hold his principles.

Posted by: sheba | December 17, 2011, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Ron Paul predicted the housing crisis and warned against it years ago. I wish that my house was not worth about $100,000. less than I paid for it about 7 years ago.

Posted by: beaches24 | December 17, 2011, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Now that the Iraq war draws to a close, and the Afghanistan war is two-thirds through, the chicken hawks like Bachmann — and Obama — want to get another stupid war in the pipeline.

We’ve had 18 years of war between Bush and Obama. Seems like only 10 years worth because Iraq and Afghanistan wars ran concurrently for 8 years.

Really, all those anti-Paul commentors should just give it up. You’re asking us to accept another 10 or 15 more years of stupid war-n-waste via Iran on top of the current 18 years. So just give it up already, it isn’t flying anymore, the anti-Paul attacks.

Posted by: dom youngross | December 17, 2011, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

What threat? You really think that Iran would let a nuke fly and risk being wiped off the map? Some Muslims may not care anything for themselves, but their community as a whole is a different story. That main reason for pursuit of a nuclear weapon by Iran is the bullying and rhetoric coming from Washington. They see how we treat countries with nukes vs those without. For some reason Dr. Paul is the only candidate that understands this.

Posted by: rippedpockets | December 17, 2011, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I’m 19. I can assure you the main reason why we like Ron Paul is not because of the drugs. That is a ridiculous assumption. I personally hate drugs. I hate smoking. I even hate alcohol. But when the government decides what is wrong and what is good for you there is some problems. If you did research on countries that have little to no laws banning drugs you will see their drug-related crimes are almost unheard of. Please don’t generalize on people who are actually using our brains to vote for this upcoming election. It’s people who generalize that have gotten us to where we are now. Thanks! Have a nice day and RON PAUL 2012!!!

Posted by: Ray Kidder | December 17, 2011, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

“Yet he’s anti abortion and anti gay marriage. So which is it? Does he support individual rights for everyone? Or just some? If it’s just some, then he’s a hypocrite.” – George H

George, Ron Paul is not against gay marriage. He is of the opinion that it should be up to the states to decide. I’d say that’s more liberal on the matter than Obama. He is against abortion, because he views that as affecting another individual besides the pregnant woman, although I’m not sure he would be for the federal government legislating on the topic.

Posted by: K | December 17, 2011, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

As I see it, Ms. Bachmann is either insecure with herself and trying to prove herself Commander-in-Chief material by throwing a gauntlet down on Iran, or is actually trying to provoke some kind of Muslim terrorist action against Israel or the U.S. (on behalf of a war-mongering establishment) in order for the U.S. to be justified in taking retaliatory measures. Either way, her behavior lately is foolhardy. If she really believes Iran is such a terrible threat (as she has said over and over again), would she really take such a chance of provoking conflict in the Mideast? There is something very evil at work here. Surely we all see this?

Posted by: Mary | December 18, 2011, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Ron Paul is the only candidate not in the pocket of the military-industrial complex. One should also note that those least affected by warfare are its greatest advocates. We should all know that based on the bush/cheney war ministry.

Posted by: john locke | December 18, 2011, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Ron Paul is just marginalizing–something Obama has been really good at. Another good reason why he shouldn’t be a candidate.

Posted by: Robert | December 18, 2011, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Perry all the way. Bachman is an insecure woman trying to be part of the boys club. She deseres a place in the new Admin, but not as President. Obama can go suck an egg!

Posted by: Jarrod | December 18, 2011, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Everyone keeps referring to RP as old. I’ll bet you can’t keep up with him on a bike ride!

Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: FreeTexan | December 18, 2011, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Ron Paul was hilarious on Jay Leno. He said this stuff in jest, but with some level of truth behind it.

Regardless, taken in the context of the show, Paul was clearly joking, and it was quite funny. He did great on Leno and the crowd loved him.

Posted by: Chris | December 18, 2011, 4:31 am 4:31 am

War Veterans for Ron Paul 2012!!!

Posted by: Shane | December 18, 2011, 5:20 am 5:20 am

Register Republican, Vote Ron Paul in your State Primaries to force a Paul vs. Obama head to head. You can vote for whoever you want after that in the general election. I bet Paul would take a good chunk of Obama’s ’08 supporters who wanted change.

Posted by: brook | December 18, 2011, 10:34 am 10:34 am

It is so hard to have a discussion/debate with people who agree with the wars that the US is involved in. But when i further probe these people, I find that most of them have never been in the military and none of them have been to war! Ron Paul is the only candidate that has served in the military and been to war!

We got this Mr. Paul! This is our Country we need to stand up and get it back.

Posted by: steeldragon | December 18, 2011, 11:27 am 11:27 am

If the Republicans are seriously about beating Obama in the general elections, Mitt Romney is the man they should nominate. Ron Paul may be well tempered, but he is not a presidential material. Michelle Bachmann is a monster by anybody’s standard.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | December 18, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am

When your 76 and running for President the time for mincing words or truth is over. Go Ron Paul.

Posted by: Rick G | December 18, 2011, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Iraq Fool me once shame on you. Iran, Fool me twice shame on me!

Posted by: Rick G | December 18, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Ever notice the only criticism Ron Paul gets in the comments are personal attacks? That means that his critics either can’t or won’t process what he is saying enough to debate his stand on the issues and can only revert to calling him names.

Posted by: steve h | December 18, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

I agree Steve; some of the people really seem to be brain-dead… they really can’t process the things he say. The sad thing about idiots is that they can’t even understand the reasoning for them being idiots.

Posted by: Alex | December 18, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Its not Christian-like to hate anyone. Jesus never told us to hate any human. And for all those people linking Ron Paul to Obama, President Obama has killed more Muslims in the Middle East, Afghanistan, and Pakistan than Bush did. Ron Paul is a good Christian. He values all human life.

Posted by: Steve | December 18, 2011, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

I;d rather have a nuke pointed at me, than allow John McCain to continue writing laws (in the name of terrorism) that will allow for the miltary detention of American ciztizens without charge!

I’d suck fallout before i’d give my freedom away!

Posted by: jdude | December 18, 2011, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

@JamesK: he’s not cranky at all, in fact he’s incredibly patient and polite to put up with what he does, just an old gentleman

Posted by: ace | December 18, 2011, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

not sure if she hates Muslims but she certainly knows how to appeal to the hate and fear of muslims that much the republican base harbors. In shirt, she’s a war, hate, and fear mongerer

Posted by: ace | December 18, 2011, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

*short

Posted by: ace | December 18, 2011, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.” — John Quincy Adams

Ron Paul had my vote in 2008 and will have it again, in both the primary and when he gets the Republican nomination. If he runs third party then he will have it there as well.

Posted by: Rosco1776 | December 18, 2011, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

What a crock this article is.. They act as if Ron Paul said this in a serious tone, then they lie about the audience silence. There was laughter nearly immediately.. It was obvious, to me, that he was poking fun at the expense of the other candidates. Leno is a comedy talk show, so I don’t see any foul here.

Posted by: DFerreira | December 19, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Go Ron Paul!

Posted by: rob | December 19, 2011, 10:47 am 10:47 am

The real issue addressed here is the United State’s foreign policy…not some off-hand comment Ron Paul made on a late-night comedy show when prodded about fallacies he could find with his opponents.

At what point will people learn to empathize with others? We’ve been meddling in Middle Eastern affairs since the 40s…Propping up brutal dictators/leaders in the region as long as their presence benefited the U.S. and its interest. We’re a foreign power with a completely different culture, religion, and core set of values; with bases scattered over their sovereign land trying to instill our will. Of course the people in that region are going to have some incentive to be hostile towards us.
I think if most any America was given a scenario where, say, China trying to instill its brand communism on people in the U.S. or any other country, they would not see the relationship as being friendly.
It’s unbelievable to me that the Republican base is so brainwashed by the idea of American infallibility that the common sense foreign policy espoused by Paul is reviled.

Oh, and I’m a young person and I’m voting for Paul…No, it’s not because of drugs, but I do personally believe human beings have the right to do with their bodies what they want as long as it does not harm another individual or their property. Ron Paul may not be the perfect candidate, but he sure isn’t the status quo that has gotten us $15 trillion in debt, a 9+% unemployment rate, and a complete corporate takeover of America. If you want to get more of the same, by all means vote Romney, Gingrich, Obama, etc…

Posted by: Matt | December 19, 2011, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Well, Bachmann is a liar. She has the WORST politfact rate of all the candidates.

Posted by: Adan Rodriguez | December 20, 2011, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

By all of you Dr. Paul haters and think with the likes of the rest of the GOP in pre emptive strikes on Iran, we would of struck out at Russia back in the 60′s, If you was Iran would’nt you be wanting nukes just to protect your selves from Isreal and the US. and all their propagando war talk????Damn it’s all i read is the propaganda that we are getting fed again and again by the corperat media. Have you all forgotten just a few years ago the BS we was fed about Irag and all of the WMD”S… they had and was going to use against us.
Go back and do your research, its all here on the net. Dr. Paul has nevered wavered on his views. and has predicted what will happen if we kept on the same path!!! Both economy and our foriegn affairs. and on the war on drugs.
Havent they (the goverment) learned that meddeling in other nations buisness is what creates terriosm. Havent they learned from Russia and how those wars bankrupted their country.
Dr. Paul has consistently voted the same way and not flip flopped to just to please the people and then back stab and go with corperate world. My god who could ever even think about newt. HE has to be the most corrupt person in politics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
PLEASEEEEEE IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR COUNTRY AND WHAT IT STANDS FOR AND ABOUT YOUR LIBERTIES AND ABOUT YOUR GRANDCHILDREN YOU MUST VOTE RON PAUL IN 2012

Posted by: rob | December 26, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.