The Forgotten Candidate: Ron Paul Gathers Momentum, Has Sights Set on Newt Gingrich
While portions of the national press corps have declared the GOP primary a two-man race between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, the tenacious Texas Congressman on his third run for the White House, is quietly picking up speed.
The libertarian leaning Texas Congressman is buoyed by strong poll numbers. In the latest ABC News/ Washington Post poll, Paul is polling in the top three in both Iowa and New Hampshire. Similar polls by NBC, CBS, and the Des Moines Register show the same.
Paul has set his sights on Gingrich, releasing videos that criticize the former House Speaker for a career in politics and policy shifts.
The two have not only sparred over the size of the federal government, but its scope. Paul unveiled an ad last week attacking Newt for being a serial hypocrite and for building his wealth through questionable lobbying efforts on behalf of the health care industry and mortgage giant Freddie Mac.
“He’s been on a lot of different sides on all the issues,” Paul told ABC’s Jon Karl today. “He may be the opposite of what I’ve been doing for 30 years. My positions haven’t changed all that much.”
While Gingrich has led Republicans in Washington as Speaker of the House in the 1990s, Paul has often been a thorn in their side, unyielding in his support for a radical downsizing of the federal government. Paul unveiled a budget proposal in October which cuts $1 trillion from the federal government in the first year.
Although Paul’s budget has been lauded by both conservative political commentator Rush Limbaugh and Iowa’s Gov. Terry Branstad who called it “the boldest plan to reduce the debt,” the framework has been dismissed by Gingrich.
The former House speaker labeled the plan “a non-starter.”
“If you come to me and tell me I need to lose 30 pounds and you’re going to amputate my right leg, I think it’s a non-starter, ” Gingrich told the Quad City Times.
Paul, who served in the House of Representatives with Gingrich for seven years – one while Gingrich was Speaker, gave the current GOP front-runner credit for “devis[ing] some strategies” while he led the House, but said he “falls short on leadership” in seeing those ideas through.
When asked about the Gingrich’s alleged infidelity and two divorces, Paul said”people have a right to know” about the “problems in his personal life.”
“But I don’t think that that should be the big deal,” Paul said. “When it comes to Gingrich I think everyone knows about the problems he has had in his personal life, but I think we need to know more about his policies and I think that is much more important.”
The two also sparred over the scope of government during a recent CNN debate in which Gingrich advocated for strengthening the Patriot Act, which provides law enforcement authorities enhanced tools to combat terrorism.
Paul refuted the idea, instead imploring “not to sacrifice liberty for security.” Gingrich shot back that he didn’t want to lose an American city before action is taken.
But the latest ABC News poll does show problems for Paul. On the electability issue, just 8 percent of likely caucus -goers see Paul as best able to beat Obama, trailing Gingrich by 21 points. It was Paul’s weakest attribute.
But this was far from his only challenge. Paul trails Gingrich by a whopping 30 points on having the best experience. And Paul’s renaissance on limited government and deficit control is counted by his very broad objection to his non-interventionist views.
In the coming weeks, Paul plans to continue airing ads in the early primary states reminding voters how’s he’s different from Gingrich.
The message will be reinforced by an extensive get-out-the-vote effort. The campaign is sending 500 young supporters to Iowa and New Hampshire. The program is called Christmas Vacation with Ron Paul, and through it, youth activists will travel around the key early-voting states to drum up support and get out the vote for Paul.
Paul’s organization is his greatest asset and the starkest contrast to Gingrich. Yahoo! News reported that phones for Newt Gingrich’s Iowa campaign office finally arrived on Tuesday, exactly one month before the state’s caucuses.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
They may think he is unelectable only because that is what media pretends. In fact the same day a poll in Iowa showed Paul tied with Obama in a general election while ALL other GOP Trail badly. isn’t it telling that he actually polls best yet it is the media
Meme voters think is real?
Shameful reporting.
Posted by: On | December 7, 2011, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Whats funny is i think Paul is the only candidate who CAN beat Obama. Come on nobody reallyy wants gingrinch to be president i think the same can be said for romney. The people will get behind Paul once he is heard more.
Posted by: Daniel | December 7, 2011, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I agree. These biased articles on him conveniently leave out any poll that shows something different. It’s amazing that he has done so well in spite of a terrible job done by the media.
Posted by: matt | December 7, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
support the troops and vote for Congressman Ron Paul.He leads all candidates including Obama in active military donations. Our troops know who the commander and chief should be. Ron Paul or world war 3. Thats all folks.
Posted by: jr rogan | December 7, 2011, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Zero Democrats would vote for Neocon Newt.
very few Indies would vote for Neocon Newt
Ron Paul Army bags a plump Salamander.
Posted by: NadePaulKuciGravMcKi | December 7, 2011, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Peace, Liberty, and Freedom through limited government and a free market society !
Ron Paul 012 !
Posted by: Chickasaw | December 7, 2011, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
As an independent who was very frustrated with the status quo I was extremely grateful that Obama was a candidate. However after he has received the Nobel Peace Prize and continued on much of the same policies that Bush advocated I will be voting for someone who I believe is committed to doing what he says. As an independent I will be putting my support behind Ron Paul.
Posted by: Hopeful | December 7, 2011, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Do not get your hopes up that the MSM will pay attention to Ron Paul after a victory in Iowa. Look at who the advertisers are for the large media outlets. The banks, military industrial complex, oil and the pharmaceuticals will all take major hits to their bottom line when the Paul policies go into effect. They will ignore him as long as they can, and when they do start to write significantly about him, it will be vicious. There may be better coverage in the smaller outlets where the advertising dollars are not as dependent on companies that get federal subsidies.
Prepare for the long haul and lots of hard work. The revolution will not be televised.
Posted by: JohnM | December 7, 2011, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
He is only forgotten because mainstream media outlets like ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX and CNN forgot about him in the first place. Now they are all coming back to call him “forgotten”. That’s what you call a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Now Ron Paul is set to win Iowa and the mainstream media is doing the world a favor and giving Ron Paul some sunshine. Jason Volack you should feel pride in the fact your boss assigned you to cover the candidate who is going to win Iowa. You are going to be the talk at the water cooler on January 4th.
Posted by: JayS | December 7, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“Do not get your hopes up that the MSM will pay attention to Ron Paul after a victory in Iowa.”
I agree. Most people will dismiss the win as a ‘Mike Huckabee 2008′ moment. Most of the emphasis will be put on NH and FL.
Posted by: gavin | December 7, 2011, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Ron Paul is the only candidate worthy of the office. He will not dodge the questions nor avoid the issues. His answers are the same each and every time he is ask. If you want to hear what you WANT to hear listen to Mitt. If you don’t know what you’ll get, listen to Newt. if you want straight forward answers… You know…Look at Ron Paul’s site it stays the same.
I do not agree with him 100% but if you give me Newt or Mitt as a selection,
I’d rather have Oh bomb a- nation for four more years.
Obama, Just sink it fast and just lets be done with it !
Ron Paul could, if you let him, help us from the dire issues that are at hand.
Posted by: Clay | December 7, 2011, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Ron Paul isn’t a career politician like Obama and Gingrich. He doesn’t spout sweet nothings to the media. I don’t agree with everything he says but at least he makes firm statements. He he goes Independent, he will take votes from both parties because he does not play party politics. The media wants empty headed politicians in their own image.
Posted by: Greg | December 7, 2011, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“But this was far from his only challenge. Paul trails Gingrich by a whopping 30 points on having the best experience.”
** As if this is a relevant point to even be making? I hate the weight that is given to polls, considering that the majority of our public are complete fools when it comes to public policy and have no respect or understanding of our freedoms and why they are so important to hold onto.
” And Paul’s renaissance on limited government and deficit control is counted by his very broad objection to his non-interventionist views.”
And this … jesus, learn how to use your pronouns better.
Posted by: Tyler | December 7, 2011, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I’m confused. How is non-interventionism a mark against him? Please, America, enlighten me. Do you actually LIKE that America spends trillions of dollars that we don’t have, puts our military boys’ lives on the line, all to go meddle in other countries’ business?! Is being world police and bullies an admirable thing?
If your family was a disaster, can’t pay electricity and mortgage, marriage in shambles, your kids don’t respect you, and your youngest needs a heart transplant… is this really the time you should be breaking into your neighbors home, spending thousands of dollars and redecorating his place?
Posted by: Doug | December 7, 2011, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Newt, This is not about losing a few pounds, the patient has sepsis. Sometimes if the infection has gone too far, amputation is the only answer. Dr. Paul is delivering the bad news along with the good, we’ll need to amputate, but we’ll live.
Posted by: Kit Maira | December 7, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Forgotten? I don’t think so. The only ones that “forgot” him were you guys in the media. Ron Paul has been alive and well and nipping at Newt’s ass. As a matter of fact, it may even be the other way around! Can you feel it coming now, ABC News?
Posted by: Stages | December 7, 2011, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
The soldiers is for Ron Paul, the youth is for RP, awake people are for Ron Paul. Those who are not awake are in fear of Ron Paul. Irrational and terrible fear, like he wants to eat their kids for dinner lol. RON PAUL 2012!!!
Posted by: Juan | December 7, 2011, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
The forgotten candidate and the ignored candidate is two completely separate things. Main stream media chooses to ignore him. But he is anything but forgotten. He his views and ideas are reaching people. And people want actual change. He is the only candidate who follows through with campaign promises And doesn’t compromise his morals to pander for votes whether it be wall street bankers or other politicians
CHANGE IS COMING
******Ron Paul 2012******
Posted by: Bill | December 7, 2011, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Ron Paul is loopy , and so are his supporters .
Posted by: davem | December 7, 2011, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Finally the media shows some sense.they have finally admitted the inevitable to themselves..lets see how long it lasts….be it as it may…for the first day in a year the media is now left the task of actually informing the american people…lets hope it can do that with some semblance of fairness and honesty….SO THAT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE ENOUGH INFO TO MAKE THE BEST DECISION THEY CAN MAKE…WHICH IS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT!!!!
Posted by: CapnHowdy | December 7, 2011, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
If somehow Ron Paul could be nominated, the Republicans would have to vote for him over Obama.
But if Newt is the candidate there aren’t many Democrats or Independents who would for him, and
Obama would get his second term. The Republicans won’t know what hit them if they keep Ron Paul
side lined. How they can get behind this re-tread of Newt thinking he will beat Obama only shows their
desperation.
Posted by: Carrie | December 7, 2011, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
“Forgotten candidate” my ass! Where have YOU been? He’s been our front runner from day one! It’s about time you lamebrains caught up!!
Posted by: Michael Edwards | December 7, 2011, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
The forgotten candidate? No. there is a HUGE difference between forgotten and ignored.
Posted by: Nick | December 7, 2011, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Another key difference between Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich:
Paul’s supporters respect and love him. Gingrich’s walk out on him. This speaks to Dr. Paul’s leadership qualities.
Posted by: Mary12 | December 7, 2011, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
The author of this article is guilty of the same crime as most journalists who write about Ron Paul: not thinking critically.
You say that Ron Paul is not very “electable” and you base this claim on a poll which asked likely caucus-goers who was most likely to beat Obama. This is a pretty weak indicator for being elected.
The facts are staring you right in the face. Not only would Ron Paul get a tremendous showing from his supporters and Republicans in general, he would get nearly all the independent vote *and* even steal a ton of votes from the left! No other candidate can say this.
Jason Volack, you need to think and use common sense before you write.
Posted by: Michael | December 7, 2011, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Ron Paul has great ideals about fiscal issues right now. The other Republicans are out there rattling sabers, about attacking Iran, the fact that the military industry complex owns Republicans and want to talk about regime change. I hope the American people are sick of warmongering Republicans. Newt Gingrich will polarize this country like never before.
Posted by: Dennis Stone | December 7, 2011, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Ron Paul is the grand uniter. I have never seen so many different people from all walks of life in solidarity for Paul. A lot of people don’t realize it, but Paul has been running the narrative of the country for the last three years. He’s the most powerful “unelectable” politician in modern American history, and the media ridicules themselves with how they try to frame the narrative about him.
Posted by: Dan | December 7, 2011, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
What a terrible article. Ron Pauls ideas will prevail…the truth will prevail. Why dont you write something with substance? Are you capable of developing your own ideas? Do you realize what a waste you are?
Posted by: Nero | December 7, 2011, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
The author of this article is guilty of not thinking critically.
If Ron Paul is the Republican candidate do you really think Republicans would vote for Obama over him? I’ll answer for you: NO.
Who do you think would get more independent votes? Answer: Ron Paul.
Which Republican candidate can even steal votes from the left? Answer: Ron Paul.
Jason Volack, you wouldn’t have to strain yourself too much to realize that the candidate with the BEST shot is Ron Paul.
Wake up and use some common sense.
Posted by: Michael | December 7, 2011, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Yep, DAVEM, your right. We Ron Paul supporters ARE rather loopy. But that;s because we are actually supporters of that loopy document, the Constitution of the United States and it’s loopy Bill of Rights.
Posted by: Al Dove | December 7, 2011, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Forgotten??? I think you mean ignored! When Ron Paul wins Iowa….the media will look like fools…that they are! You would not believe the huge number democrats that are switching to vote for Ron Paul! The so called polls don’t show this! BIG SURPRISE COMING IN JANUARY IN IOWA!!!
Posted by: Anthony Holt | December 7, 2011, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
I’ll call your poll and raise you one. A recent poll has Ron Paul as the only GOP candidate who can beat Obama. Dr. Paul draws votes from Independent and Democratic voters, which will be absolutely critical in a national campaign. Neither Newt or Mitt can expect many of these voters to pull the lever for them as the GOP nominee. On the morning of January 4th, Ron Paul’s electability should be much clearer for all to see.
Posted by: Richard | December 7, 2011, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Why do you feel the need to lie blatantly about the most honest man in politics?
Posted by: voltara | December 7, 2011, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
LOL! Ron Paul would get crushed in a general election. Sure, he has a small but vocal following that thinks he’s the next coming of Christ. But that’s not even enough to get him the Republican nomination, let alone a win in a general election. His ideas are simply too radical for mainstream America. Y’all are seriously delusional if you believe he has a shot at the Republican nomination. The Republican powers that be would NEVER allow it. They don’t like him……
Posted by: searambler | December 7, 2011, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Newt cannot win against Obama. He will attract zero independents, blue dog dems and will alienate many conservative with his flip flopping. Newt is the last flash in the pan between the real debate between Romney and Ron Paul.
Repubs need to understand the best chance to beat Obama is either Mitt Romney or Ron Paul. Ron Paul is a consistent conservative who will attract independents, libertarians, and anti-war dems. Also consider most Americans are fed up with these undeclared wars. Romney will be a fake big spending GWB “conservative”. Ron Paul will cut the spending that needs to happen or we will be in a financial crisis that will jeopardize what remains of this Republic.
Posted by: George Mission | December 7, 2011, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. – Gandhi
Posted by: Ken Danagger | December 7, 2011, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
“Ron Paul isn’t a career politician like Obama and Gingrich. ” ~~~~~~~~ LMAO. Ron Paul has served a DOZEN two-year Congressional terms, dating back to his first one in the mid-1970s. Newt made his first Congressional office right around the SAME TIME Paul did (only 2 years different), so their political careers have been roughly the same length. Obama has the least experience. He didn’t make a Congressional seat until the mid-1990s.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 7, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Ron Paul can not be stopped. Get out of the way or get run over ! It’s all the other GOP candidates that are unelectable. It’s Obama or Ron Paul .
Posted by: Jason Ferrier | December 7, 2011, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Newt gingrich is a good talker, but he talks too much. newt talks this way to some people, and that way to other people. He can trick most people out there with his talk about no more new taxes or smaller government, but his lies are obvious if you look at his voting record. Newt is a liar outside congress, why would anyone believe he would stop lying outside congress?
Romney is disgusting and has zero likeablity, i dont trust him very much.
congressman paul is truthful, and has good ideas on how to improve government. i don’t know much else about him, but i think i can trust ron paul more than any other candidate running right now.
Posted by: Robert Palsao | December 7, 2011, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Looking forward to vote Ron Paul in 2012!
Posted by: RPTwentyTwelve | December 7, 2011, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
One intriguing aspect of the media is that they run almost exactly opposite to what I experience in my daily life. All discussions having anything to do with politics involve Ron Paul. I never hear anyone else talking about Obama or anyone else. We the people seem to be talking about Ron Paul and the restoration to our founding principles. The discussion of anyone else as a viable candidate does not come up. If it weren’t for the media manipulation most of us don’t really care to know much if anything about other people. The discussion is all about Dr. Paul.
Posted by: Banished Jester | December 7, 2011, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Newt and Romney are both jokes, all about Ron Paul. I have turned on 20 plus people here to vote Dr. Paul, keep informing people the ideas of freedom, peace, self responsibility. I wish more people would do their own research and stop listening to the bias news.
Ron Paul 2012!!
Posted by: Richard | December 7, 2011, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
The forgotten candidate. Oh, that’s rich I tell you.
Back during the 2007-2008 presidential campaign season there was a ABC debate in August ’07 at Drake University. Across the street there were 150 Ron Paul supporters, 12 or so Mitt supporters (paid staffers) and 4 Rudy supporters (again paid staffers). So how was this reported to the nation? Well somewhere here on the ABC News website there’s a photo of all the Mitt and Rudy staffers cheering (read: proposed for a photo-op) and a photo of a loner Paul supporter holding a sign after a thunderstorm blew through.
During the debate a lot of Paul supporters went over to the Drake Dinner and lo’ and behold there was a guy there by the name of Frank Lutz, a Fox News poll spinmeister. I watched over Frank’s shoulder as his focus group used a joystick type device to rate the answers of the candidates. Most of Doctor Paul’s answers were rated highly favorable. But did Fox News show that? No, only selected portions showing what Fox News wanted to show – and what wasn’t the truth.
The general public is slowly catching on to the fact what is referred to as a “free press” in the U.S. is really a propaganda machine available to the highest bidder. And that my friends is the military-industrial complex, big pharma, big ag. to name a few.
Posted by: John | December 7, 2011, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Its Ron Paul or Obama 4 more years.
Ron Paul Nominee:
Angry Democrats like Paul and many have switched parties to vote for him
Paul beats Obama in Independent votes even bias media polls show this
The Republicans cant stand Obama and will support Paul over him.
Ron Paul wins
If Newt or Romney get the Nominee:
Democrats wont vote for ether even if angry at Obama for lieing
Independents will mostly vote Obama
Paul supporters and unhappy Republicans will write Pauls name in or vote 3rd party
Obama wins
Posted by: James | December 7, 2011, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
The problem with the establishment mantra that “Ron Paul Can’t Win” is that when he starts winning primaries the ruse won’t hold up any longer. The establishment media blackout and propaganda campaign against Ron will fail. Ron Paul has garnered 20 GOP Presidential Straw Poll wins — more than ANY other GOP candidate — and FIVE TIMES AS MANY as establishment favorite, Mitt Romney. Flavor of the Month, Newt Gingrich, has won ONE straw poll. Ron Paul’s straw poll victories constitute 50% of the 40 GOP Straw Polls thus far.
2011 GOP Straw Poll Wins for Ron Paul:
1st – February 12, 2011, Washington, D.C. – CPAC Straw Poll
1st – February 27, 2011 Phoenix, AZ – Tea Party Patriots Virtual Summit Straw Poll
1st – March 20, 2011, Sacramento, California – Republican Liberty Caucus of California Presidential Straw Poll
1st – June 16-18, 2011, New Orleans, Louisiana – Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll
1st – June 19, 2011, Clay County, Iowa Republican Party Straw Poll
1st – August 20, 2011 New Hampshire Young Republicans Straw Poll
1st – September 12, 2011 Cincinnati Tea Party Straw Poll
1st – September 17, 2011 California GOP Straw Poll
1st – October 7-9, 2011, Washington, D.C. – Values Voter Straw Poll
1st – October 13, 2011, Los Angeles County, California – RPLAC Straw Poll
1st – October 18, 2011, Charleston, South Carolina – Charleston County Republican Party
1st – October 22, 2011, Columbus, Ohio – Ohio GOP Swing State Straw Poll
1st – October 29, 2011, Des Moines, Iowa – National Federation of Republican Assemblies Presidential Straw Poll Tally 1
1st – October 29, 2011, Des Moines, Iowa – National Federation of Republican Assemblies Presidential Straw Poll Tally 2
1st – November 5, 2011, Illinois – Illinois Straw Poll
1st – November 14, 2011, North Charleston, South Carolina – Charleston County Republican Party Straw Poll
1st – November 14, 2011, San Diego, California – San Diego GOP Straw poll
1st – November 15, 2011, Springfield, Missouri – Missouri Tea Party Straw poll
1st – November 19, 2011, North Carolina- NC Registered Republicans Straw Poll
2nd – November 19, 2011, Rockford, Illinois – Memorial Hall Straw Poll
Ron Paul’s 2nd Place GOP Straw Poll results:
2nd – January 22, 2011, Derry, New Hampshire – New Hampshire Straw Poll
2nd – (Statistical Tie for 1st) – August 13, 2011 Iowa Straw Poll, Hilton Coliseum in Ames, Iowa.
2nd – (Statistical Tie for 1st) – August 27, 2011 Georgia State GOP Straw Poll
2nd – October 29, 2011, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; West Alabama Straw Poll
2nd – November 19, 2011, Rockford, Illinois – Memorial Hall Straw Poll
Posted by: Greg | December 7, 2011, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Just look at these replies and it shows the proof that the Main Stream Media is biased to Dr. Paul. Look at how many of the posters here support him. He is the only honest politician running for President from either side of the aisle. His record speaks for himself.
Ron Paul 2012 – Agree or disagree with him. It’s time we have someone in the Oval Office that is honest and has integrity. Our last statesman.
Posted by: mike | December 7, 2011, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
First off Newt you need to lose about 50 pounds not 30. Whats your counter propsoal? To have the servants shovel more food in your mouth? Thats essentially what any plan of yours would be, throw more money at an already bloated government and see if more of the same fixes the problem. The truth is you have no intention of limiting government or following the constiitution, your voting record shows it. So which plan is the real non-starter again?
Posted by: BEN | December 7, 2011, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
“Just look at these replies and it shows the proof that the Main Stream Media is biased to Dr. Paul. Look at how many of the posters here support him.” ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mike, Mr. Paul’s campaign is well-known for recruiting paid and volunteer spammers who spend time posting supporting comments on popular websites like this one. Because of that fact, it would be impossible to accurately gauge his level of support by looking at the comments posted here or anywhere else on the Web.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | December 7, 2011, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Ron Paul is the only choice for Americans who love freedom and individual liberties!!
Posted by: destiny | December 7, 2011, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Is it just me or did the interviewer almost pull Ron Pauls arm off with that handshake at the end. LOL
Posted by: RPistheMAN | December 7, 2011, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
One of the above posts mentioned the Ron Paul supporters at a debate back in 2007 and how the media showed a lone supporter, an essential black out of the truth. Well folks, they did it again, and i was there to welcome Dr. Paul at the Detroit debate when his motorcade pulled in. There was a line of people 1/4 of a mile long there…JUST TO WELCOME HIM. I dont know how many hundred it was, but you be the judge.
YOUTUBE “Ron Paul Visits Oakland University Part 6″……then ask if the media covers the news or makes it? and oh, yeah…pass that video along. RON PAUL 2012!!!
Posted by: Koby in Detroit | December 7, 2011, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Any “Democrat” who’d vote for a fool like Paul is not a Democrat , and really never was. Ron Paul is CONSERVATIVE RIGHT WING , end of story . If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck , well …DUH! Ron Paul is a(nother) disingenuous right wing hypocrite who doesn’t have a clue about running the Federal Govt. , all he wants to do is tear it apart and make it even more dysfunctional than the GOP have made it with their foot-dragging obfuscations . Any Democrat would be better than Ron Paul , or ANY of the pathetic losers the RNC has trotted out thus far . Losers unparalleled in American society , just complete trash . And evidently there are people would actually vote for pond scum like Ron Paul , its amazing , in the most stupid way imaginable that is . Duh….
Posted by: Davem | December 7, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
What is wrong with Americans ? They so stupid and uninformed / misinformed that they are easily taken in and fooled by right wing snake oil salesmen and greasy Trump fake American Idol crap like Ron Paul , that’s what . Ron Paul is a fake Dr. scammer who , along with his scamming progeny , has billions hoarded away due to the scamming US health care system , he’s just looking after his own interests .
Posted by: Americans_are_dolts | December 7, 2011, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Dear corporate elite mainstream media, Get it right… Ron Paul IS second place in Iowa’s latest polls, AHEAD of your darling Romney (not “tied”) and he’s at 18%, NOT 15%! If you’re going to argue “close numbers” as an excuse for the misrepresentation than you must be consistent about it, like when you gave Bachman huge attention for wining the Iowa straw poll while ignoring Ron Paul when it was a statistical with him. Your bias against Ron Paul is out in the open now and you’re no longer fooling anyone. So go ahead and keep at it but know you’re just hurting yourselves and giving more power to the liberty movement.
Posted by: Mike | December 7, 2011, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
“If you come to me and tell me I need to lose 30 pounds and you’re going to amputate my right leg, I think it’s a non-starter”
That would be a problem. However, we’re not talking about a leg here. We’re talking about the wool hat, ear muffs, mittens, parka, long johns, thermal socks, matterhorn boots…at the beach……………..
Posted by: Carl | December 7, 2011, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Millions of grassroots Americans from all political parties and all walks of life and backgrounds have recognized that twelve term Congressman Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate seriously addressing the crucial linkage between both our unsustainable military presence of 900 overseas bases in 130 countries (and five ongoing undeclared wars), and our unsustainable entitlement system built upon shifting fiscal sand and massive deficit spending.
This fraudulent welfare-warfare state, enabled by covert monetary manipulation by the Federal Reserve, is bankrupting the American people.
We have a national debt approaching fifteen trillion dollars, with outstanding future obligations of $104,000,000,000,000,000 in Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Civil Service and Veterans benefits, etc.
America is a constitutional republic, not an empire.
We are not the policeman of the world.
It is time to end the empire, end the wars, and bring the troops home.
It is time for strategic disengagement and nonintervention in the internal affairs of other nations.
It is time to restore peace, prosperity, and freedom to America.
It is time for Ron Paul 2012.
Posted by: Charles | December 7, 2011, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Anyone who tries to bash Ron Paul and dismiss him as the front runner should be recognized as a threat to this country. You people are just as bad as the dirty politicians we currently have. You people are the reason this country is where its at now. I really hope and pray that you people dont have children. People like you are the ones that corrupt young minds. Too bad this young mind thinks for itself. I want our troops to come home, I want the states to have the rights they should have, i want a smaller government, i want the Federal Reserve audited, I want us to stay out of foreign affairs, I want Israel to takie care of theirself, I want us to stop wasting billions of dollars fighting a drug war we will NEVER win, I want the US to stop being the policemen of the world… I want Ron Paul in 2012.
Posted by: D | December 7, 2011, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Obama=Bush=Romney=Newt . They are all the same. They will not fix anything. Our one party potical system has been squeezing out the middle class for the last 2 decades. Real inflation is at 70% since 2008. The FED is printing endless money= stealing from US (the people). Ron Paul is our only hope. Ron Paul 2012. I will write him in if I have to.
Posted by: brandon | December 7, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
VOLTARA SAID: ” His ideas are simply too radical for mainstream America. Y’all are seriously delusional if you believe he has a shot at the Republican nomination. The Republican powers that be would NEVER allow it. They don’t like him……”
Ron Paul’s ideas might be too radical (i.e. conservative) for the “republican powers that be”, but they definitely are NOT too radical for mainstream America. The “powers that be” are so busy admiring themselves that they are ignoring the American PEOPLE! WE want the “powers that be” who made this mess of our economy, have kept us involved in undeclared preemptive wars and attempted to destroy America’s constitutional values to move out of our way….because led by Ron Paul, we intend to take back America!
Posted by: TnMuse | December 7, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
That interviewer is pitiful, asking empty questions of Ron Paul about OTHER candidates for the purpose of sound bites without substance.
Posted by: reader | December 7, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Wow. Just look at the support this man has. Every single article I read with his name on it has overwhelming support for this man and his message. There are, as always, dissenters who either don’t understand his message or are only repeating sound bites they hear from the media without doing their own thinkng – but a VAST majority of people seem to WHOLE-HEARTEDLY support this man. MSM and their advertisers don’t want him in office because he will end the part that we foot the bill for. I am 100,000% in Ron Paul’s Corner, and that will NEVER change for ANY candidate. You can take that straight to the White House.
Posted by: Alex Karalanian | December 7, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
I do not understand how the non-interventionist policy Ron Paul advocates is a negative. Unless your polls are restricted to the GOP machine and their military-industrial complex backers. Its a shame that everyone repeats the warnings of President Eisenhower, but the warnings are ignored by most.
Posted by: Steve | December 7, 2011, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I would vote for Ron Paul….I agree with quite a bit of what he proposes…..and I’m a Democrat!
Posted by: TSMACK | December 7, 2011, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Who cares about what the PUBLIC THINKS about who will beat Obama. Why don’t we release some polls showing the results when Paul is MATCHED UP WITH Obama. Those are much more realistic.
Posted by: Jake | December 7, 2011, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Obama was elected and worshiped by the media. Dr. Ron Paul is ignored by the media. The media will never pick my president again. Stop all wars, audit the fed, boot illegals, pay off the debit, end income tax, end handouts, take care of AMERICA first. Live free or die.
Dr. Ron Paul president of the United States 2012
Posted by: RHettr | December 7, 2011, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
One only one Republican out-polls Obama among independents. The same Republican has received more donations from our troops than all other candidates combined, including their commander-in-chief. That would be Ron Paul. When is the media going to get a clue?
Posted by: Jim McClarin | December 8, 2011, 12:15 am 12:15 am
2012 Is About Abolishing Slavery In America
We’re on the verge of abolishing slavery in America.
Ron Paul’s aim is to abolish the debt slavery & tax bondage of the FED/IRS Complex.
Over the last 100 years of slavery we have gradually lost most of what America set out to be, do and have.
We are not free. We are slaves.
Force people to put aside all of the non-essential issues and focus on abolishing slavery.
Let’s start there.
Our first priority is to regain our liberty, peace and prosperity.
This is the narrative, the context for all of my campaign communications with others. It shuts down all of the nattering and competitiveness over the flavor-of-the-month candidates.
No other candidate is cognizant of, or focused on abolishing the crushing debt slavery and tax bondage as a social issue.
Without our liberty, nothing else matters.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Posted by: AngeloS | December 8, 2011, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I am not being paid. I am not a “bot.” I support Dr. Paul 100%. I will not vote for anyone else. I am sick of this farce, and don’t want to see my daughter and son suffer for the blunders of unconstitutional wars, through taxes OR their blood.
Posted by: AudreyB | December 8, 2011, 12:26 am 12:26 am
- Iowa GOP straw poll: Ron Paul 2nd: 27% Paul, 28% Bachmann (only 200 more votes than Paul, which is statistically a tie for 1st). (17,000 participants , $30/each)
- Iowa NFRA straw poll: Ron Paul wins: 82% Paul, 14% Cain. (400 participants)
- Iowa Dubuque Tea Party straw poll: Ron Paul wins: 52 votes Paul, 24 votes Newt. (90 participants)
The only polls thus far of real in person Iowa voters using real votes, not telephone polls of likely voters (which is what Newt has only “won”.) Unlike Bachmann, Paul’s popularity has steadily increased. Ron Paul is the real Iowa front-runner (no one else.) When real voters have voted: Ron Paul, 1st place.
Ron Paul has the most support of young voters, male and female; Ron Paul has the most support of Dems and Indy’s who are finished with Obama’s lies; Ron Paul has the most support of active U.S. military, more than all other Repubs and Obama combined; Ron Paul has the best groundgame in Iowa (and almost every other state) – real grassroots support, highly-organised and effective; Ron Paul has a huge amount of supporters of all ages, religious beliefs, races and occupations in all 50 U.S. States who will show up to vote in person using real votes in any kind of weather no matter what.
Ron Paul will win Iowa, and the mainstream media will become near-schizophrenic attempting to downplay it. Why? Candidates are elected by voters using real votes, and when Ron Paul starts to consistently win caucus’ and primaries one after another after another, the mainstream media’s purposeful avoidance, discrimination and ignoring of Ron Paul, coupled with their bogus telephone polls of likely voters will have to cease completely because no one will believe it anymore and they won’t be able to spin it any other way. The mainstream media’s lies about Ron Paul have already mostly fell apart, and very soon they’ll completely disintegrate. Also, most of Newt’s “popularity” is manufactured through the afformentioned telephone polls of “likely” voters – he has nowhere near the real support Ron Paul has.
Ron Paul will win 2012. Get ready for it. :)
Posted by: RonPaulWins2012 | December 8, 2011, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Yeah I don’t know what this dude is going off about above me. Me and all the Ron Paul supporters I’ve met are people who really support him, and were never paid to do so. Also, how can Paul have “brainwashed” me when the entire reason I support him is because I research things for myself and DO NOT accept anything just because somebody tells me so? I would bet that is true for the majority of Ron Paul supporters as well, because that’s basically the reason we all support him in the first place.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m more than happy to be open-minded and have an intelligent discussion with someone who doesn’t agree with Ron Paul on something. However, it’s true that blinding ignorance is not a disqualification for free speech. So good for you, all you Paul bashers who almost always resort to your empty insults (paulbot, paultard, etc), while almost never having anything of substance to say. You must be generating so much anti-Paul support, seeing as you make such a convincing argument. lol.
Posted by: Justin H | December 8, 2011, 12:57 am 12:57 am
“But the latest ABC News poll does show problems for Paul. On the electability issue, just 8 percent of likely caucus -goers see Paul as best able to beat Obama, trailing Gingrich by 21 points.”
_______________________________________________________________________________
Actually, electability shouldn’t even be an issue. The issue ought to be who has the ideas that resonate with the voters. If you were to cast your vote based solely on the electability issue, then you would lose even if the guy you voted for, won.Conversely, voting for the guy with the best ideas makes you a winner, even if the guy looses the election. It’s a thing called integrity. Ever heard of it? You complain about congressmen being devoid of integrity, but by basing your vote on electability, you are just as bad.
Posted by: john locke | December 8, 2011, 1:00 am 1:00 am
If it’s anyone but Obama in 2012 then Ron Paul has the best chance of beating him according to latest Iowa (NBC/Marist) poll. But the spin artists in the lame stream press try to paint picture in the minds of people that Ron Paul can’t win and is not popular. The people that want you to forget about Ron Paul and choose a different candidate to vote for are the controlled bought and paid for press and others that promote the status quo.
Posted by: Michael | December 8, 2011, 2:17 am 2:17 am
“If you come to me and tell me I need to lose 30 pounds and you’re going to amputate my right leg, I think it’s a non-starter, ” Gingrich told the Quad City Times.
Newt’s analogies always sound good when you allow him to dictate the dialogue. What it it were a 29.5 pound tumor, Newt? Would you still want to keep it? Because that is what we’re talking about here. And fortunately, the good doctor knows the difference.
Posted by: Justin Rogers | December 8, 2011, 3:03 am 3:03 am
RE: “But the latest ABC News poll does show problems for Paul. On the electability issue, just 8 percent of likely caucus -goers see Paul as best able to beat Obama, trailing Gingrich by 21 points.”
. . . which is truly remarkable considering the Marist poll from the day before shows Paul as the only GOP candidate being competitive with Obama. When considering both DEM and GOP voters. Paul runs dead even with Obama (42-42). This is in DEM-heavy Iowa, for Pete’s sake! Romney, on the other hand, trails Obama by 7 percentage points (39-46), and Gingrich is behind by 10 (37-47)
Hmmmm . . . who is it that can beat Obama? Who is it that can win the swing states? Doh!
Posted by: Justin Rogers | December 8, 2011, 3:25 am 3:25 am
newt is 68 y/o. ron paul is 76 y/o. romney is 64 y/o. obama is 50 y/o. of the 4, ron paul is dangerously too old to be elected potus. no matter who ends up running against obama, it will take the votes of some democrats, independents, moderate and centrist republicans, and other political parties to unseat obama. obama won by a landslide last election and it was not soley on the votes of democrats. ron paul does not seem to appeal to the majority of voters, regardless of political party, needed to unseat obama. although some of ron paul’s messages sound good, many simply do not.
Posted by: david | December 8, 2011, 4:31 am 4:31 am
RON PAULGOT LOTS OF SPUNK, I LIKE HIM AND I AM A DEMOCRAT. HE IS AS SHARP AS A RAZOR…BESIDES, WHAT DOES AGE HAVE TO DO WITH IT, HE HAS THE EXPERIENCE,, HE IS CALM AND COOL AND TOGETHER…….HE WILL BEAT ALL THEIR ASSES LOL, LOVE TO HEAR HIM TALK
Posted by: emalyn | December 8, 2011, 6:19 am 6:19 am
“But the latest ABC News poll does show problems for Paul. On the electability issue, just 8 percent of likely caucus -goers see Paul as best able to beat Obama, trailing Gingrich by 21 points. It was Paul’s weakest attribute.” – ABC News
Bad silly analysis.
Who ever is the Repub Candidate this election cycle will win the Presidency.
Obama, the liberal Progressive Demo couldn’t beat a Repub such as Crusty the Clown.
Barry will not win re-election.
It defies logic that a president could be so inept and expect the American people to give him another chance.
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 7:25 am 7:25 am
I’m closing in on 60, and I’ve never seen such Candidate. A few have approached where by they were truthful and stead fast in their convictions. The percieved ‘Enigma’ around R.P. is greatly due to Media, I for one have seldom seen such a ‘branding’ by media, seldom an avoidance of a Candidates policy proposals and never ever, such distortion of those policies by the media.
I understand times are a chainging, but complete fabrications by media of a candidates policies brings me to ask my own questions. Why would media radicly distort? I looked on the ‘Huff’ the other day, R.P. mentioned only once “He wants to legalize drugs”.
I read up, and see Federal jurisdiction handled by a D.C. a thousand miles from where I live is not the best way. That both sides of the Aisle are using Fear this year, where Hope was used last election year. R.P. only proposes that States govern… much more, and better than a Centralized Fed.
Obviously, the ‘different’ candidate has the hard road. But this year the cost to election is unseemly, along with representation by paid media. Being ‘paid’ has become more important than the citizens, contisutionality falls before the God almighty dollar it appears, rights are more directed by even fewer, farther away from the population base that has to deal with the problems at hand.
States now have little choice as Centralization has created a monopoly, all I see is corruption within the elected.
Blagojevich convicted, his predessesor serving six years, both parties where Obama came from guilty as sin. Newt an embarrasment of the first order, Rommney comes from junk bond selling,
Perry has some disgusting connections to Paid for Prisions and other contributers.. the list goes on and on…
But the Media does not discuss the Wall Street donations to the Obama Elections, or Rommneys or Newt’s many failures in policy’s personel or profesional……
But the Media can say, R.P. ‘wants to legalize drugs’..
What a waste the media has become. What a tool they’ve become, nothing more than advertising, not news.
Posted by: Mike Dar | December 8, 2011, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Man, there are sure going to be a lot of disappointed Ron Paul supporters around here, when the Republican Party rejects him as their candidate yet again. Y’all better write-in Ron Paul next November. A vote for Ron Paul is a vote against the actual Republican candidate, and thus, a vote for Obama. Thanks from the Democrats!
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Don’t be too hard on this writer. The corporate media wants a certain outcome in the election so they determine the nominee for us. Never mind the facts. The media wants a certain outcome in their reporting, so the writer must skew, leave out, and slant whatever is necessary to achieve that product. This writer is just doing his job and has no power whatsoever. Poor guy. I really do feel for him. Must be horrible to have to sell your honor that way. He is just another poor victim of the corporate media. I pray Ron Paul is the nominee so he can win the general election and get this mess straightened out. Then maybe this poor schmuck and others like him can get real jobs and feel good about themselves again! Hang in their sir, help is on the way! Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: cynthia | December 8, 2011, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I speak for a lot of Republican voters I know, when I say that Ron Paul is the only GOP candidate we will vote for. If Gingrich is the nominee, and Paul doesn’t run 3rd party, I’ll be sending my vote to Obama (cringe).
Posted by: Rynosaur | December 8, 2011, 10:52 am 10:52 am
“If Gingrich is the nominee, and Paul doesn’t run 3rd party, I’ll be sending my vote to Obama (cringe).” – Rynosaur
That’s silly.
It would be better to cast a write in vote for Crusty the Clown.
Posted by: Noz | December 8, 2011, 11:41 am 11:41 am
People argue that Ron Paul will take us back 100 years.
Last century IS the Federal Reserve and the IRS.
Last century IS foreign and domestic wars.
Last century IS a bloated, special interest pandering, federal government.
Last century IS policies that do not, have not, and will not work.
About the only thing I would keep from the last century is my Liberty which is being systematically destroyed.
The bigger government gets, the more influence it has on your lives. The bigger government gets, the more influence special interests have. Therefore, the bigger government gets, the more influence special interests have on YOU.
Small government, checked by the Constitution, combined with a restoration of personal liberties, and limited in scope, destroys lobbyists and special interest involvement. It empowers YOU.
To progress, you must digress.
If you label yourself a progressive, the policies of President Obama represent regression and status quo reliance on a failed system. About the only thing that is progressing is our debt. A true progressive would be for change in a failed system of government. A true progressive would support those that do represent change. A true progressive would not fear their Liberty but embrace it.
So before you assign labels to yourself, take a hard look at who represents you. Chances are you are not as progressive as you think. You will realize that it is they who call themselves progressive, that are the true regressives. They are impeding progress by relying on last century government.
With that point, I choose to digress. Join this century. Join Ron Paul.
Posted by: Carter | December 8, 2011, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Let’s highlight Gingrich’s behavior during 1995 when he helped intensify a stalemate which lend to the “shut down” of the government- we don’t want history to repeat itself!
Posted by: Katrina | December 8, 2011, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
DELEGATES DELEGATES DELEGATES! Make sure you vote for the right delegates. In many states the popular vote means NOTHING. The delegates decide everything! NO DELEGATES, NO RON PAUL…..look into the delegate process in your state and consider becoming one….but don’t tell the party leaders who you support….
Posted by: Dave77777 | December 8, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Ron Paul is SO 18th century………….
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
The video was awful. Terrible interview. Nevermind your issues, Dr Paul, who’s a bigger flip-flopper, Newt or Mitt, come on, give us some dirt!”
And the way he slaps the handshake at the end like the congressman was his pal at the pool room on opening Sunday kickoff…no class.
Posted by: Reggie | December 8, 2011, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
biased media. If your objective is to interview Paul as a candidate- why are you only asking PAUL about NEWT and ROMNEY?!?! I’m not sure about everyone else, but I sensed a palpable level of contempt and cynicism from interviewer manifested through the form of GOTCHA questions so that HE can be the one that stumped Paul or gotta great negative sound byte from Paul. Unfortunately, this is the way most of the media has treated Paul- Jon Stewart and the Daily Show did a great job of airing this point.
RON PAUL REVOLUTION 2012!!!
Posted by: michaelj007 | December 8, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Ron Paul is loopy , and so are his supporters .
Posted by: davem | December 7, 2011, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Yep, loopy for liberty!
Posted by: Nunya Biznezz | December 8, 2011, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Ron Paul is SO 18th century………….
Posted by: Searambler | December 8, 2011, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Yep the spirit of 1776 is alive and well.
Posted by: Nunya Biznezz | December 8, 2011, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
“If you come to me and tell me I need to lose 30 pounds and you’re going to amputate my right leg, I think it’s a non-starter, ” Gingrich told the Quad City Times.
Sorry Newt, Paul is telling us he wants to amputate five mutant and cancerous legs that have grown from your body. He says the prognosis isn’t good and without surgery your life will be cut dramatically short. With the surgery, your odds for enjoying a full and prosperous life are very good.
Wake up America! The cabinets Paul wants to eliminate are corrupt bureaucracies that are costing taxpayers trillions each year. These failed and wasteful programs help no one except for the well paid puppet-master lobbyists and their congressional puppets.
Let’s allow the Good Doctor operate and restore America’s greatness before it’s too late.
Posted by: Knell | December 8, 2011, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
The fact that Newt compares the US Government to someone who only needs to lose thirty pounds shows that he’s just the same as the rest of these big-defecit politicians. The US Government is like a morbidly obese person who needs the walls in his/her house brought down just to get him/her to the hospital for emergency liposuction.
Posted by: Andrew | December 8, 2011, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Once the people find out that he is not an isolationist, but the opposite; that he is not anti Israel but pro Israel in the best way freeing them from control; and when people realize that it is either keeping our liberties and constitutional law from being raped by Obama , then they will see that there has never been a statesman so bold to stand up for decades for our liberties, economy, and right to live the freedoms that we take for granted. Why not give a man who really cares about the country more than his political career
Posted by: Robert Stone | December 8, 2011, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Ron Paul would get all of the independent vote that Obama got in 2008 but has since squandered. Ron Paul would defeat Obama in a landslide.
Posted by: Douglas | December 8, 2011, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Are we to continue to vote for the same two ideologies over and over again and expect different results? Have we voted for so long for the lesser of two evils that we are surprised at the outcome?
I concede that Ron Paul’s ideas and solutions may be a hard row to hoe, but once we return to the Constitution, Liberty and sound economic principals we can get our house in order.
I will vote my conscience. Not any party and certainly not what the MSM tells me. I will not vote for the lesser of two evils. Ron will get my vote, write in or not.
Ron Paul 2012.
Posted by: Robert | December 8, 2011, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Someone called me loopy.
Ron Paul 2012!!!
Posted by: Tommy | December 10, 2011, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Ron Paul all the way! People that think Newt stands a better chance in the general election than Ron clearly have not been doing their homework. Rep. Paul has run an effective campaign with very limited media exposure. Where would Gingrich campaign be if he wasn’t the focus of the media right now?
Posted by: Jake | December 11, 2011, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
The reporter was talking mostly about Romney and Newt…. even when they interview him, they’re trying to puff up the other candidates. They also try to question him and trip him up, but fail miserably. Its amazing how Ron can get so much support when the media is so extremely bias. Just wish I could vote for Ron from Australia
Posted by: gar | February 25, 2012, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm