Dec 16, 2011 8:37am

The Presidential Planner: Michelle to Hawaii; Barack Works With Congress

Now that Congressional leaders have finalized a deal to stave off a government shutdown, the White House will likely spend much of today negotiating the remaining sticking points of a payroll tax cut extension.

The president has threatened for weeks that lawmakers not go home for the holidays until a compromise is agreed upon. The first lady, however, is not waiting to see how the standoff ends. She and her daughters are heading to Hawaii this evening to start their family vacation, with or without the president.

Congressional leaders reached an agreement Thursday night to fund the government through next fall, which is expected to pass the full House and Senate today. Lawmakers are now considering a short-term extension of the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance.

The president continued to press lawmakers Thursday to extend the payroll tax cut before it expires at the end of the year and warned that if they don’t, 160 million middle class Americans would see their taxes go up on January 1.

“There’s no reason why we shouldn’t be able to extend these items — the payroll tax cut, [unemployment insurance] — before the holidays.  There’s no reason the government should shut down over this,” Obama said. “I expect all of us to do what’s necessary in order to do the people’s business and make sure that it’s done before the end of the year.”

The president will spend the morning behind closed-doors and will deliver remarks to the 71st General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism in the afternoon.

User Comments

Yes, the president and family should have vacations. But is the country hurting economically? Could the first family take a less expensive (for the tax payer) vacation? IMHO, giving the govt’s debt and the country’s economic woes, the president could be a leader and set a more frugal example.

Posted by: deanbob | December 16, 2011, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Deanbob – like so many this holiday season, they are going home for the holidays. She is originally from Illinois but he is from Hawaii and this is apparently their tradition – escape the cold Illinois winters with warm Hawaii. He has taken far fewer vacations and less time off than a certain prior Republican President who left this country in a shambles.

Posted by: pksk531 | December 16, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am

That would be a falsehood. Obama dictates to the Congress, and demands they do a specific thing, or he will NOT cooperate and allow it to pass. Obama is THE problem, in Congress.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 16, 2011, 9:19 am 9:19 am

THIS ARTICLE: “The president will spend the morning behind closed-doors and will deliver remarks to the 71st General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism in the afternoon.”
============================
LOL! ….. watch what happens now, the Republi-minion crazies are going to see this and think he’s talking to another workers union.

…. hehehehehe!

Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | December 16, 2011, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Wow. A vacation where Michelle actually stays in the United States and is not recklessly spending obscene amounts of money over seas.

Pretty sure she’ll spend obscene amounts of money anyway as that is what she does best.

Posted by: kate | December 16, 2011, 9:54 am 9:54 am

I guess Chicago is too cold this time of year.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Well, it’s apparent Obama’s Executive Order 13589 — Promoting Efficient Government Spending doesn’t apply in this case. The Secret Sevice guys probably love it however.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Sure wished I could afford to go home for Christmas, let alone have a Christmas meal and give those I love gifts. Maybe when the leadership changes in 2013.

Posted by: blane | December 16, 2011, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Attached to the government spending is a provision to save the light bulb, let’s
hope it survives. Once again no mention of Obama Signing into law the defense
spending bill.Human Rights Watch Executive Director Kenneth Roth states this
bill codifies indefinite detention without trial into U.S. law. Also expands the Military role
in holding suspects and does enormous damage to the rule of law. According to Roth,
Obama goes down in HISTORY as the President who ENSHRINED indefinite detention into law. I guess this and having half the country living in poverty
according to U.S. Census, and the facts we now have the most people on food
stamps, and the highest yearly average gas prices, shows that his record is just
what democratic voters are looking for.

Posted by: deadwrestler | December 16, 2011, 10:15 am 10:15 am

newcountryman wrote:”I guess Chicago is too cold this time of year.”
.
and after all the trouble Tony Rezko went to for getting the oBama’s such a sweet deal on their house…. they won’t even go there.

Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | December 16, 2011, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Michelle Obama’s 8th vacation this year alone – over $14 million of taxpayers money spent on this overbearing bore’s vacations.

Posted by: Michelle is Dennis Rodman | December 16, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican
—————————————————————-
You honor republicians with your name, Forrest Gump was a hero, a medal of honor winner, a college all American, an extremely succesful businessam, that honored his best friends family..One that served this country to the highest standards

We thank you for your name and thank you for showing that Obama meets none of these standards

Posted by: republicians are heros | December 16, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I ain’t staying here, I don’t needs no pitlin taxpayer payroll thing… I gets all the taxpayer money i want.. now excuse me while we cook and pig and eats it

*note: the author is a comedian and can say anything he wants, at least that what jon stewart and bill mahers says

Posted by: I be gone ya'll | December 16, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Repubs are heroes; There’s no shortage of pseudo intellectual snobs on the Left.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I wonder if Obama will join all his friends next January, Ayers,Rezko,Blago and Rev. Wright for the good ole days or will he move to Hawaii?

Posted by: specialty57 | December 16, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am

“the president could be a leader and set a more frugal example”

That is exactly wrong. Those who can afford it should be spending more, on vacations and whatever else, to boost economic activity. The whole frugal-austerity thing is economic nonsense.

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 11:16 am 11:16 am

So glad her majesty has AF2 at her disposal. Wouldn’t want to delay the 17 day vacay for her and the little princesses.

No worries, Barry will join them on AF1 tomorrow.

Posted by: Agent X | December 16, 2011, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“shows that his record is just what democratic voters are looking for”

If you think there are alot of people on food stamps now just wait till you see what happens if the Republicans force spending cuts and austerity measures on the public and shrink the economy even further…except if they just cut out food stamps. Judging by the favorable reaction Newt gets when he slanders the unemployed and the poor for example, it might happen.

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 11:37 am 11:37 am

So much for stopping global warm…uh, I mean climate change.

Posted by: Durban | December 16, 2011, 11:50 am 11:50 am

POSTED BY: PKSK531 | DECEMBER 16, 2011, 9:18 AM 9:18 AM, it did not become TRADITION until the taxpayer are footing the bill. Could not even take time off from campaigning when his grandmother was dying, the one who raised him, and you talk about tradition.

Posted by: Lizzie | December 16, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am

“If you think there are alot of people on food stamps now just wait till you see what happens if the Republicans force spending cuts and austerity measures on the public and shrink the economy even further…except if they just cut out food stamps. Judging by the favorable reaction Newt gets when he slanders the unemployed and the poor for example, it might happen”

Yeah, without food stamps there’d be mass starvation!

Posted by: Wagyu | December 16, 2011, 11:56 am 11:56 am

“Those who can afford it should be spending more, on vacations and whatever else, to boost economic activity. The whole frugal-austerity thing is economic nonsense.”

The whole frugal-austerity thing is a left-wing myth with no basis in reality.

And funny how you never criticize the banks. Is it because of the relationship between wall street and Obama? You know, his lips to their butts.

Posted by: foggy | December 16, 2011, 11:59 am 11:59 am

the air force 2 or whatever they call it cost about $85,000 to run per hour. Hawaii is a 15 hour flight both ways YOU DO THE MATH

Posted by: jane ryan | December 16, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“And funny how you never criticize the banks. Is it because of the relationship between wall street and Obama? You know, his lips to their butts.”

Uncalled for, Foggy. Nothing to see here, please disperse…

Posted by: Peter Orszag | December 16, 2011, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

–the air force 2 or whatever they call it cost about $85,000 to run per hour. Hawaii is a 15 hour flight both ways YOU DO THE MATH–

Soon that plane will be solar powered. Trust me.

Posted by: George Kaiser | December 16, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

“Is it because of the relationship between wall street and Obama?”

Can you guys get your story straight? Obama is supposed to be anti-business, remember?
Everybody protects the banks, absolutely everybody. You’re certainly not going to get any Republicans to impose anything on banks, they’re owned by them. Republicans are actively engaging in eroding what meager restrictions have been put in place already, their attack on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau nomination is all about stopping government regulation of business including banks. If you really want to go after banks…and we should, you’re better off registering as a Democrat and working to get Democrats elected who will attempt it.
And ask the Europeans if the frugal-austerity thing is just a myth. They’re in the process of frugally austerisizing their way right into bankruptcy as we speak.

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

If you really want to go after banks…and we should, you’re better off registering as a Democrat and working to get Democrats elected who will attempt it.”

I laughed so hard I spit my 5th martini of my 6 martini lunch right on John Corzine!

Posted by: Lloyd Blankfein | December 16, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Posted by: Lloyd Blankfein etc…

If you really want to be funny pretend you’re Mitt Romney and tell us how many American jobs you saved while packing up and selling off businesses all over the country for Bain

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

…and of course the biggest question,,, will he try yet another new shave ice flavor combo??

Posted by: oahu ollie | December 16, 2011, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

–If you really want to be funny pretend you’re Mitt Romney and tell us how many American jobs you saved while packing up and selling off businesses all over the country for Bain–

Numbers, that would have been a funny response back in 2009.

Posted by: 38,500 | December 16, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

“If you really want to go after banks…and we should, you’re better off registering as a Democrat and working to get Democrats elected who will attempt it.”

Can you cite a scintilla of evidence to support that ludicrous claim?

Posted by: foggy | December 16, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

spamming imposter:
If you really want to be funny then pretend you’re Newt Gingrich and tell us again how deficits and debt are our real problem while you propose adding $850 billion to the deficit in one year.

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Deanbob – like so many this holiday season, they are going home for the holidays. She is originally from Illinois but he is from Hawaii and this is apparently their tradition – escape the cold Illinois winters with warm Hawaii. He has taken far fewer vacations and less time off than a certain prior Republican President who left this country in a shambles.

Posted by: pksk531 | December 16, 2011, 9:18 am 9:18 am

*****

Posted by: Dave | December 16, 2011, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“Can you cite a scintilla of evidence to support that ludicrous claim?”

Go easy on him. Maybe he hasn’t had a drink. Bartender, another martini!

Posted by: Lloyd Blankfein | December 16, 2011, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Of course Foggy, nearly all of the marginal regulations which have been imposed on Wall st. have been championed by Democrats, and nearly all of the efforts to weaken them have been led by Republicans. It’s happening right now. That’s why we have a regulatory law called Dodd-Frank and not Boehner-McConnell. Can you cite any evidence to the contrary? What regulations of Wall St have the Republicans passed since they gained control of the House? Now that’s a funny one.

Posted by: numbers | December 16, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Numbers; If Obama and his wife were not spending taxpayer money, your comment 11:16 AM about spending to stimulate the economy would be less disingenous. As it stands, it’s just spin.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Numbers; If Obama and his wife were not spending taxpayer money, your comment 11:16 AM about spending to stimulate the economy would be less disingenous. As it stands, it’s just spin.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

You would be smarter to research the fact the Obamas will be spending lots of their own money to take this Christmas holiday on top of the usual security issues that come paid for with the position of President of the United States.

I’m tying to remember the right wingers whining about the record number of vacations and vacation days Bush took. Guess they weren’t paying attention then. Or they’re hypocrites flogging excuses for their hypocrisy.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Don, I know they are spending some of their own money. But they aren’t buying the fuel for separate flights. We are!

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Numbers; If Obama and his wife were not spending taxpayer money, your comment 11:16 AM about spending to stimulate the economy would be less disingenous. As it stands, it’s just spin.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Your argument was very weak, which I just proved. (the Obamas will be spending lots of their own money to take this Christmas holiday on top of the usual security issues that come paid for with the position of President of the United States.)

I don’t remember the Republican right picking apart Laura Bush’s travel without her husband on every trip ever taken under the sun. What you’re dealing out is hypocrisy – a double standard – a mainstay of the Republican right.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Don, More like the Obama’s are dealing in hypocrisy. He’s the one who was preaching “change”. Google Executive Order 13589 — Promoting Efficient Government Spending.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Don, More like the Obama’s are dealing in hypocrisy. He’s the one who was preaching “change”.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

He has not only preached change, he’s delivered. He’s taken 60% less vacation days than Bush did during the same period of his presidency. Too bad you can’t recognize that through your hypocritical haze.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Bush went back to his ranch in Texas. He went home. Last year, Hawaii Reporter research documented that the President’s Hawaiian vacation for one year alone cost taxpayers more than $1.5 million, with additional expenses virtually “impossible” to estimate without the White House’s cooperation.

That is about a $6 million tab so far from taxpayers for Obama’s family vacations in the islands since he became President.

The thing that bugs me is the doubling up of AF1 and AF2 along with C-17 transports to Hawaii. It’s opulent.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Bush went back to his ranch in Texas.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Bush flew back and forth to his ranch for vacation days 77 times during his presidency – 77 4-hour round trips to his home with all the accompanying costs. How does that compare to two extra flights for the Obamas? Besides the 77 documented trips by Bush, how many times did Bush’s wife fly home without him?

Bush had already taken 4 MONTHS MORE (180 days vs 60 days) holiday time than Obama in the same time period.

Did you understand that? Bush had taken FOUR MONTHS MORE vacation time than Obama in the same time frame.

You’re whining is misdirected, partisan, and a touch late.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Big whoop! How many hours does it take to fly from the WH to Hawaii vs from the WH to Texas? What is the difference in cost?

You can spin this any way you want, but the 1-%er and his family have no problem with spreading their carbon footprints across this planet, renting out entire floors of hotels for family, friends, entourage, and taking separate airplanes on our dime. We won’t even talk about the meals they are swilling down at our expense. Doesn’t look like tofu and green stuff to us. Meanwhile, 1 in every 45 children are homeless, a record number of people are jobless, on food stamps and are having a not so merry Xmas.

When they removed that 200lb load of waste from that OWS site, they should have dumped it right in the Oval Office.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Big whoop! How many hours does it take to fly from the WH to Hawaii vs from the WH to Texas? What is the difference in cost?

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Oh the dimness of the wit. SEVENTY-SEVEN trips back and forth to the ranch. TEN trips a year. You figure it out.

Bush having taken FOUR FULL MONTHS MORE holidays than Obama at this point. Four full months MORE holidays!

The hypocrisy of the Republican right would be a joke if it wasn’t so completely corrupt and corrosive.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

What part of the current economic conditions I wrote about in my previous post did you miss? These are the conditions America are experiencing under obama.

Bush took working vacations, entertained heads of state in his home. obama has been on one, long continous vacay since he has been in the WH while. His vacays are all about him. Which explains why the majority of Americans are making plans to wave goodbye to his narrow butt in January of 2013.

Meanwhile, you are still whining about Bush who has been out of the WH for 3 years now.You need to whine about that 1-%er, 21st century version of Neville Chamberlain that is currently occupying the WH, excuse me, Air Force One. I bet the seats never even get a chance to cool off. That’s ok, keep your blinders on. They WILL be ripped off come November, 2012.

It is almost 6pm. Shouldn’t you be getting ready to go twinkle somewhere instead of mindlessly ranting on a blog???

Lol.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“Barack Works With Congress”….Are they all at the golf course???

Posted by: deanbob | December 16, 2011, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Oops…

“Americans are experiencing under obama”

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Yeah, well, you should have whined about that when Bush was in office. I didn’t vote for him and I have no heartburn with him, either. In retrospect, he was a far better commander-in-chief than obama could ever hope to be. Your whining about Bush does not excuse the absymal failure that is obama. Now, get back to twinkling or find somethng useful to do besides bellyaching about President Bush.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

I use to work as a Aerospace contract engineer for 16 years. New York, Reston, VA, Huntsville, Al, Albuquerque, NM. About every other weekend, maybe every third, I would go home for the weekend. I guess I was taking vacation. Gee! Never looked at it like that. BTW, it was on MY dime.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Works out to be something like 50 vacation days/year. What an absolute slacker I apparently was!

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

No, YOU should have been aware enough to be criticizing Bush at the time AND smart enough to understand Obama has improved tremendously on the vacation records of both Bush and Reagan – and give credit where it’s due instead of whining on like a little baby.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Again, the shallowness of the research is pathetic.

Start with August 2001. Bush took the entire month off, arriving back in Washington just in time to watch the planes hit the twin towers. And it didn’t get any better – within the first three years he had taken 6 full months of vacation time, not including weekends.

Now flying on the taxpayers dime to get home for the weekend (like Bush did many multiple times) is a totally different matter. It’s as if you wingers have just woken up from a coma, and have no sense of history or proportion. Get with it!

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

ROFL!

Bush worked so I thought he earned his vacations. Yes, obama has improved on the vacation records. Most time taken after doing nothing to earn it.

Lol.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I guess Obama’s is just too darn busy campaigning to go home….also on our dime.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

If you were really interested in the betterment of this country, you would have not voted for obama.

ROFL!

(Spank me somebody. This is too easy!)

Lol. :D

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

I guess Obama’s is just too darn busy campaigning to go home….also on our dime.

Posted by: newcountryman | December 16, 2011, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Seriously, did you just wake up from a coma? Are you unaware of Bush traveling home 10 times per year, every year for 8 years on your dime? Are you not aware of how much a huge improvement Obama has made on that?

Get some historical perspective, it will make your posts far more worthwhile.

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

(Spank me somebody. This is too easy!)

Posted by: ceeLeelee | December 16, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

For sure, if revealing yourself as a high school juvenile is your goal, you’ve done an excellent job!

Posted by: Don | December 16, 2011, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I don’t see how anyone in their right minds can justify BarryO and Michelles extravagant taxpayer spending. You can’t spin it anyway but negativelly. He is the first president to reside over a downgrade in our credit rating. Secondly, Bush went home to Crawford, why doesn’t Barry go home to Chicago. Thirdly, the first lady needs to wait and fly in one plane with the children and her “husband” instead of charging the extra flight to the taxpayers and this has been going on ever since he got in office. Fourthly, Their vacation costs are well over 14 million dollars now and our country is broke and getting broker. How is that for hope and change? Obama may be able to come up with a billion dollar campaign chest but it will not be gotten righteously primarily because he has been charging the taxpayers for all of his campaign trips instead of using his campaign funds to do it. Barry and MIchelle remind me of a couple that think they won the lottery and just can’t spend it fast enough. Their behaviour is classless and clueless and they don’t even realize it. When they went on their trip to Ireland and England it was written in the British newspapers that they had a bigger entourage than Queen Elizabeth. These two believe they are American royalty: King and Queen. Summed up: They are an embarrassment to us and to our country. We currently have one out of every four children on foodstamps so to even mention that the repulbicans will make it worse is disengenuious. We had nowhere near that number under Bush or other presidents and we certainly did not have 20 million people out of work and on unemployment. If anyone votes for this president based on what they can get welfare, foodstamp, unemployment wise they deserve what will happen to them and their families because this president needs four more years not to get the country better but to finish his job of destroying it. I for one cannot even fathom what our country will be like for another four years under this empty suit. He is the worst president in the history of our country and the majority of Americans realize it now no matter how the liberal media try to spin it.

Posted by: Susan | December 18, 2011, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.