Dec 10, 2011 6:00am

With Race Heating Up, Republicans Set To Square Off In Pivotal Iowa Debate

DES MOINES — Let the wild rumpus start.

Only three weeks from the Iowa caucuses, the top Republican candidates will square off tonight at a pivotal debate in the state capital. The debate, hosted by ABC News and moderated by Diane Sawyer and George Stephanopoulos, starts at 9pm ET, live from Drake University.

The prime-time debate comes as the GOP race has started to reach a boiling point. With Newt Gingrich surging to the top of the pack, former front-runner Mitt Romney has launched scathing attacks from all sides, from his key surrogates to a political action committee that, while not affiliated with the campaign, is funded by many Romney donors.

The ad accuses Gingrich of ”flip flopping” on a slew of issues and claims that Democrats are hoping that the former House Speaker — rather than Romney — secures the Republican nomination.

With a picture of President Obama on the screen, the ad asks, “Why is this man smiling?” The answer: “Because his plan is working,” the ad’s narrator says. “Brutally attack Mitt Romney and hope Newt Gingrich is his opponent.”

Romney is not alone by any means in attacking Gingrich. Michele Bachmann, who won the Iowa straw poll in August but has since faded, dubbed Gingrich “a poster child for crony capitalism” and “the ultimate consummate influence peddler.” Ron Paul, who finished a close second to Bachmann at the Ames event, has unveiled slick web videos going after Gingrich. Jon Huntsman, who is not competing here in Iowa, called Gingrich a product of Washington “who participated in the excesses of our broken and polarized political system.”

Even Democrats, who to date have focused their attacks on Romney, turned their sights toward Gingrich after seeing him skyrocket up the polls.

“For the longest time, Gingrich was not really a factor in this race, he was left for dead at the checkout counter at Tiffany’s,” quipped Obama strategist David Axelrod to the New York Times. “Now he is resurgent and he could be the nominee.”

The flurry of attacks should come as no surprise to Gingrich: It’s what happens when you’re on top. Every poll released this week seemed to bring better and better news for Gingrich. An ABC News/Washington Post poll showed Gingrich in the lead with 33 percent support in Iowa, followed by Romney and Paul tied at 18 percent. In two other key early states — South Carolina and Florida — Gingrich also holds impressive leads of 23 percent, according to the most recent CNN-Time magazine polls. In addition, according to a Quinnipiac University poll of Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, Gingrich “cuts sharply into President Barack Obama’s general election lead should he win the GOP nomination.”

It’s all enough to make some strategists wonder what took the rest of the Republican field so long to step up their attacks.

“My suspicion is they’re all looking at themselves saying, ‘Why didn’t we start this weeks ago?’” veteran GOP strategist Karl Rove told Stephanopoulos on “Good Morning America.”

It’s all leading up to a fascinating — and potentially explosive — debate come Saturday night: There’s the newfound clarity of the race, with the upstart Gingrich at the top, followed by Romney, with much more money and much stronger organization. There’s the increasing intensity, as attacks come fast and furious from all sides. There’s the unpredictability of the race, from Rick Perry to Herman Cain, as various candidates have surged to the front only to fall back into the pack. And don’t forget the looming caucuses: Iowans vote on Jan. 3.

Thus far, the debates have played a key role in the race, from Gingrich’s surge to Perry’s plunge.

“Due to the debates and the campaign events that the candidates hold here in our state, it gives us the chance to know them better and know their campaigns better,” said Enrique Peña-Velasco, a Des Moines businessman. “For us it’s really helpful.”

“Iowa is the hub of the political process in the United States, and it is always the place where the whole process begins to determine the fate of the national campaign,” he added.

So how will Gingrich cope with the bullseye emblazoned on him these days? Perry, for instance, was so beaten down by his opponents’ attacks that he joked at a September debate in Tampa that he felt like “a pinata.” But Gingrich is trying not to take the bait.

“I’m going to stay positive, I’m going to talk about how we solve the country’s problems,” he said this week. “And I have one opponent: Barack Obama.”

For their part, some Drake students are hoping the ABC debate brings forth some new ideas from the candidates on how to jumpstart the country’s struggling economy.

“For me the most important topics are the economy — the economy and unemployment,” said Joe Frake, a senior at Drake who is preparing to start his job search this winter.

Despite the fact that there is little time left before the caucuses, Iowa voters still appear open to changing their minds. According to the ABC poll, over half of the voters said they could still switch candidates.

“The last word belongs to the Republicans who go to the caucuses on January 3,” said Drake Prof. Eduardo Garcia.

With the weather getting colder — Des Moines on Friday was blanketed in snow — and the GOP race heating up, Saturday’s debate provides the candidates with one of their last opportunities to earn the support of voters.

Matthew Jaffe is covering the 2012 campaign for ABC News and Univision.

User Comments

Dr. Ron Paul is the one to watch. He knows economics and wants to cut one trillion in the first year. the ONLY candidate who can really get our deficit down and start to restore America. He follows the Constitution, he wants to bring our troops home now, he gets the most donations and support from the military than any other candidate, that should tell us something right there. He knows about protecting our liberty and the value of human life. He does NOT flip flop, he is consistent and moral and HONEST.

Posted by: Pamela LaBrake | December 10, 2011, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Dr. Paul does have some good ideas and opinions but, he is just too far out of the mainstream on too many issues to get elected in a national election. He comes from a more simpler time but, is trying to run in a very complicated world today.

Posted by: Indymind | December 10, 2011, 7:50 am 7:50 am

This should be entertaining. Am still trying to ascertain which Republican candidate is the most clueless.

Posted by: plantain_11 | December 10, 2011, 8:04 am 8:04 am

INDYMIND, 20 percent (and growing) would disagree with you on the premise that peace, more freedom and smaller government are “out of mainstream”.

Posted by: Len Grady | December 10, 2011, 8:07 am 8:07 am

I am for freedom and prosperity and faith and small government and honesty….

and Ron Paul 2012

Please at least give him a chance. Make your own choices. Learn from the past.

Posted by: thegeneral | December 10, 2011, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Ron Paul has a few good ideas wrapped up in a whole lot of crazy ones. Mainstream America won’t have the opportunity to reject him in a national election, because the Republican Party won’t pick him as their man to go against Obama. They know he would get crushed in a general election. He has run twice before. Once as a Libertarian, and once as a Republican. This bid of his will end the exact same way – in failure. Sorry, Paul supporters, but that is the reality of America today…………

Posted by: Searambler | December 10, 2011, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I hear Dems, PRESS, and Republican elite, the primaries are over. So, who have YOU (Dems, PRESS, Republican elite) decide our candidate will be: Romney or Newt. Paul has supporters with the same passion as Obama 2008 supporters. This means, a few may become disappointed by what the naysayers say, but most will press on towards the goal.

Posted by: deanbob | December 10, 2011, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I sincerely hope all you Ron Paul supporters write-in his name next November. I really hope y’all “walk the walk” instead of just “talking the talk”. Stand by your man! Write in Ron Paul! Because Barack Obama could use the boost……….

Posted by: Searambler | December 10, 2011, 9:31 am 9:31 am

In Nov of 2007, where was McRib in the polls? I know noone who is voting for either Newt or Romney. It is mainly Paul, with a smattering of Bachmann, and a few for Obama.

Posted by: deanbob | December 10, 2011, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I am curious, how does Ron Paul square his willingness for federal restrictions on a womans personal medical decisions with his claim to absolute freedom?

Posted by: dan | December 10, 2011, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Conservatives and Independents will bicker and fight each other for another six months…. but once the candidate is chosen… and the choice is just “Obama versus whomever”…. people will compare just those two people… they will look at the last three disastrous years and KNOW the nation made a mistake!! — NO WAY Obama wins a second term… just look at his record which he can’t “run” on!!!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | December 10, 2011, 9:52 am 9:52 am

deanbob | December 10, 2011, 9:30 am post ———– Your so-called “Republican elite” are the good ol’ boys that run the Republican Party. They don’t like Newt at all, because they know him better than anyone else. (And they HATE Ron Paul!) They will not allow him to be their choice, ’cause they KNOW he would get destroyed in a general election. Just read a few of the things his Republican co-workers are saying about Newt, if you don’t believe me. They’re practically writing anti-Newt campaign ads! The Republican candidate will be Willard Mitt Romney……

Posted by: Searambler | December 10, 2011, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I hope ABC will give each candidate equall time not like CBS who showed favortism in the last debate.

Posted by: David | December 10, 2011, 9:55 am 9:55 am

dan | December 10, 2011, 9:50 am ——— You act like there isn’t another “person” involved in the “medical decision”! —- Ignoring that fact is blatant deception ….. ignorance is bliss!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | December 10, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am

The ONLY thing that re-elects Obama is a Ron Paul independent run…. and Ron is not that stupid!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOppposition | December 10, 2011, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Newt “Let’s make nine year olds school janitors” Gingrich, or Mitt “Corporations are people, too” Romney. What a pathetic choice y’all have on the Right. EVERY other candidate on the Right is already out of the running, the proverbial ‘dead men (and woman) walking’. Obama will win another term.

Posted by: Searambler | December 10, 2011, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Whats funny is Ron Paul is the only candidate who CAN beat Obama. Those republicans who want just want obama out as they claim will vote for him. Paul will nearly sweep the independent vote which is constantly rising in numbers, and even a sizable share of democrats will vote for him. The people will rally around Dr Paul its gingrinch and romney who are an automatic loss

Posted by: daniel | December 10, 2011, 10:11 am 10:11 am

TheLoyalOpposition – it is the woman’s decision and her’s alone. That is a constitutional fact. Deal with it.

Posted by: dan | December 10, 2011, 10:17 am 10:17 am

SEA, Lets hope for our sake obama takes a permanent vacation this time. His only solution to anything is throw more money at it. About everything he has thrown money at has failed, due to bad planning or just a bad idea including the Solyndra scandal he and Chu should payback out of their own money. Especialy when they were warned in advance to stay clear. But Obama knowing more than anybody else took a half billion and you know the rest of the story.KAISER.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 10, 2011, 10:19 am 10:19 am

I just love the pictures here on abc that says “what the gop candidates should see”. Do they not realize that Obama is president and maybe he ,Pelosi, and Reid should have looked at them 3 yrs. ago instead of making a bad situation worse?Thats right, Obama is not responsible for anything, every single failure is Bush’s fault and now the House.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 10, 2011, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Albert Einstein said “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”. That’s exactly how most people in this country feel about the GOTP (Grand Old Tea Party) debates. The GOTP is so far out of reality with their extreme right views that it doesn’t matter which clown they nominate. Oh and TheLoyalOpposition…you’re full of it. While the race will be close, if you think folks will look at the GOTP bozos and think they’d be better off, you’re sadly ignorant about what most Americans think. Of course, you’re a “real” American, so I guess the rest of the folks don’t count.

Posted by: RyanC | December 10, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am

It is interesting! I have made comments in several sites and those passionate supporters of Ron Paul never reply or rebut my comments when I point the following:

1. Ron Paul is not conservative, he is libertarian;
2. On social issues Ron Paul is to the left of Obama;
3. In matters of national security Ron Paul is to the left of Obama;
4. In foreign affairs Ron Paul is to the left of Obama;
5. Ron Paul is to the left of Obama on handling terrorism. Just as Obama he believes terrorists have the right to an attorney and by implication it goes without saying that he believes terrorists should have the Miranda rights read to them.
6. Ron Paul does believe waterboarding is torture when most conservatives don’t believe that.
7. He lies and repeats liberal rhetoric when he states waterboarding has not yielded any positive results when there is an abundance of reports to the contrary.
8. He states waterboarding was widely used, when the reports show it was only used against 2 or 3 top terrorists.
9. Ron Paul blames the USA for 9/11. He aligns himself with the extreme leftwing conspiracy theory crowd on that matter.
10. Ron Paul’s views on our military: it is unnecessary spending. He often claims (as the extreme left does) conservatives don’t care for the deficits/debt because they are for spending with defense. Well, defense is absolutely a role of government. One of the few roles.

Perhaps there are true conservatives who want to disregard that because of his stands on fiscal matters, however, it is extremely dangerous to think that way.

Posted by: FanDaElis | December 10, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

SEA, don’t do it, Obama is not worth it! Think of the bright side. If Obam does get another four yrs. we all can take the train. Right over the cliff. You won’t be alone.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 10, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am

RYANC, you live in la-la land. Doing what Obama has been doing will only make things worst as they have so far. At least now the GOP House has stopped him. That is good. Gridlock, to avoid disaster, is a wonderful thing.

Posted by: FanDaElis | December 10, 2011, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Really, a Republican debate moderated by two loony leftists, one of whom was also a Clinton enabler ? Watch for plenty of “gotcha” questions and Republican bashing comments. Give me a break.

Posted by: Ron | December 10, 2011, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Ron said Really, a Republican debate moderated by two loony leftists, one of whom was also a Clinton enabler ?—–I thought the same thing. I wonder if Diane is still going to be televised in soft focus tonight? HDTV is definitely not her friend.

Posted by: shelly | December 10, 2011, 11:10 am 11:10 am

LOLOL…Fandaelis, that’s a pretty lame comeback. Why don’t you tell us what any of those GOTP bozos will do that will make things better? Other than you’re tired, worn out “repeal Obamacare, lower taxes on the ‘job creators’, cut entitlements”, blah, blah, blah. Because those have been rejected time and time and time again and you GOTP’ers don’t seem to understand folks don’t support it. You live in a GOTP fantasy land that thinks only in black and white and life is all shades of grey…which is compromise. But since you don’t believe in that, you think everyone else will follow your marching orders lock, stock, and barrell. And if you think you are going to be in control after November 2012, you’re definitely in la-la land. And funny you talk about gridlock – when the GOTP controlled Congress back 2002-2006 and the Democrats in the Senate used to filibuster, you know you were screaming right along with the rest of the GOTP’ers about “the minority is obstructing the majority” and “nothing can get done..” and gridlock didn’t seem to be such a wonderful thing then. So don’t be sanctimonious and act as if the GOTP is “saving us” from disaster now. Then again, if you really believe that, don’t let one more word drip out of your lips if the Democrats do the same thing. Somehow though…I doubt you’ll remember.

Posted by: RyanC | December 10, 2011, 11:14 am 11:14 am

I also wonder why they gave these two Obama boot kissers this moderator job. Ever watch these two interview Obama? Don’t, not on a weak stomach anyway. After hearing and watching them a few times the channel went click to Married With Children. No way these two can be impartial unless they are great actors.

Posted by: specialty57 | December 10, 2011, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Isn’t Ron Paul just that grumpy old — really old — man who is contrary to anything anybody else wants to do? Obama, even with his huge failures, can probably beat him.

Posted by: Kimberly | December 10, 2011, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Most voters have come to realize its ANYBODY but Obama in 2012..

Posted by: gary | December 10, 2011, 11:28 am 11:28 am

“Remember, there was no Palestine as a state — (it was) part of the Ottoman Empire. I think we have an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs and historically part of the Arab community and they had the chance to go many places,” Gingrich said, according to a video excerpt posted online. The Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad, demanded Gingrich “review history.” “From the beginning, our people have been determined to stay on their land,” Fayyad said in comments carried by the Palestinian news agency Wafa. “This, certainly, is denying historical truths.”

Looks like good ol’ Newt is playing fast and loose with the truth again…….

Posted by: Searambler | December 10, 2011, 11:42 am 11:42 am

LOL, Searambler, no indeed. Looks like Newt hit the truth nail smack on the head, no matter how un-PC it may be. He’s likely to point out some more inconvenient truths, which will alienate him from some ignorant dullards and endear him to those who do value the Truth.

Posted by: Jimmie | December 10, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

FANDAELIS, YOU ARE A BOOB. LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION….WOULD IT BOTHER YOU IF THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT DECIDES TO SET UP A MILITARY BASE NEXT TO YOUR HOUSE?? OF COURSE IT WOULD!! THE U.S. HAS OVER 900 MILITARY BASES IN OVER 130 COUNTRIES AND YOU PROBABLY THINK ALL OF THOSE COUNTRIES WELCOMED US AFTER WE HAVE MURDERED MILLIONS OF THEIR CITIZENS. YOU’RE AN IDIOT. RON PAUL’S STANCE IS SIMPLY MIND OUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS. DO YOU REALLY THINK THE TERRORISTS WOULD HAVE ATTACKED 911 IF WE WEREN’T IN OVER 130 COUNTRIES?? YOU PROBABLY DO BECAUSE YOU’RE CLUELESS BOOB. AND YOU PROBABLY BELIEVED THEY ATTACKED US BECAUSE OF OUR FREEDOMS LIKE OLD GEORGEY BUSH TOLD US. C’MON, BONEHEAD…DO YOU ACTUALLY FALL FOR THAT CRAP….WHY HAS IT TAKEN THEM 200 YEARS TO ATTACK US IF THEY WERE AFRAID OF OUR FREEDOMS?? WE WERE ATTACKED BECAUSE WE WON’T MIND OUR OWN DAMN BUSINESS!! AND YOU PROBABLY THINK WE ARE THERE TO PROTECT THEIR RESOURCES FROM THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENTS….WE WANT TO GIVE THEIR OIL AND LITHIUM DEPOSITS BACK TO THE PEOPLE WHERE IT BELONGS…YEAH RIGHT…YOU ARE SO NAIVE…THERE IS ONLY ONE CANDIDATE THAT WANTS TO RETURN TO THE CONSTITUTION…RETURN THE POWERS BACK TO THE STATES…BRING OUR TROOPS HOME TO GUARD OUR BORDERS AND SAVE TRILLIONS ON COLONIZING SOVEREIGN NATIONS…WANTS TO END THE ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL RESERVE THAT HAS STOLEN TRILLIONS FROM AMERICAN TAXPAYERS FOR NEARLY 100 YEARS, PARTICULARLY FROM THE BUSH, OBAMA, MCCAIN BACKED BANKER BAILOUT. AND DO YOU THINK ANY OF THOSE BANKS GAVE MONEY TO RON PAUL’S CAMPAIGN….HELL NO!!.BUT WHY DON’T YOU LOOK UP HOW MUCH MONEY THEY GAVE TO THE OTHER GOP CANDIDATES, JOHN MCCAIN AND OBAMA IN THE LAST ELECTION?? YOU ARE SUCH A CLUELESS BOOB AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE THE REASON THIS COUNTRY HAS GONE TO HELL!!

Posted by: FANDAELISISABOOB | December 10, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

FANDAELISISABOOB, an elementary lesson of posting: those who post lengthy rants in ALL CAPS are either A) in Junior High School, or B) Overly histrionic and perhaps nutty as can be. Either way, they are not to be taken seriously. Good Luck. Try again when you have something half-rational to say.

Posted by: Jimmie | December 10, 2011, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Kimberley , Obama as not been a gigantic success , mainly due to 100% right wing opposition since the day he took office , but he certainly has not done nearly as bad as you disingenuously portray him . You want more Bush / Cheney ? Just look at the Dow Kim, today and compare that to the day Bush left office , now THAT is something that is empirical and not just your “opinion” . Also, Mr. Obama got OBL ,( and several other of the top Al Qaeda leaders as well ) , he pushed for , and signed into law the FIRST decent package of health care legislation this country has ever had .
Sure , any mildly disgruntled peon can can go vote for some lying ideological puppet / clod like Bachmann or Gingrich , then you get more Bush/Cheney stuff guaranteed. It’s what the “conservative ” party does , i.e. give to the rich , take from the poor to do it . They are doing it now by threatening to let the payroll tax cut expire if they don’t get a subsidy (oil pipeline )for the big oil companies they suck up to on a quotidian basis. Honestly Kim , you need to use that noodle in a better , more objective way . Obama may not be the greatest , but compared to the field of village idiots the GOP is fielding this time around , he’s certainly far more qualified in almost every respect , and far less to be worried about as well . Vote for a conservative and we’ll be in a war with Iran in less than a year , and we may do it anyway . But the fact remains , a vote for a conservative politician for any political office, including the presidency , is a vote for going back to where we were with Bush / Cheney . In truth the current crop of GOP candidates are mirror images of the lackluster and 1% loving GOP of 2001-2009. No thanks Kim , I’ll take ANYBODY but a lying scheming conservative.Their political track record is distinct , clear and obviously not in the interest anyone not in the upper 3-5% income earners of America.

Posted by: davem | December 10, 2011, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Jimmie, that’s why no one takes Ron Paul seriously . I mean the guy is a magnet for right winger loose screws and loons. It’s what he sells , i.e. extra whacky conservative ” ideas” , that draws the nutcases out of the woodwork . Hey , let’s legalize heroin ! Lmao…

Posted by: mitchtoldyou | December 10, 2011, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

“Kimberley , Obama as not been a gigantic success…”
Posted by: davem
The truest part of your post, quoted. Your reply was not convincing, but at least it was very long, and very long on tired talking points. :) Obama needs to actually grow up and take responsiblity for his own crappy performance. His tactic of always pointing the finger at everyone else is childish and ineffective. I admit it has worked somewhat in the past, but it has run out of steam, and most people see it for the empty shell game that it is.

Posted by: Kimberly | December 10, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

JIMMIE….NICE JOB…WAY TO COME BACK WITH EVIDENCE TO REFUTE THE HARD FACTS I LAID OUT….CONGRATULATIONS…YOU ARE A CLUELESS BOOB LIKE FANDAELIS…GO VOTE FOR MORE WAR AND MORE THEFT BY THE WALL STREET CRIMINAL BANKERS BY ALIGNING YOURSELF WITH OBAMA OR ANY OF THE OTHER GOP CANDIDATES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LONE PATRIOT, DR. RON PAUL…..I HAVE NO TOLERANCE FOR BONEHEADS THAT REFUSE TO WAKE UP….DON’T POST AGAIN UNLESS YOU ACTUALLY HAVE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR CASE AGAINST THE HARD FACTS I GAVE YOU….TRY TO EDUCATE YOURSELF FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE, YOU CLUELESS SPECIAL ED BOOB!!

Posted by: FANDAELISISABOOB | December 10, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

A vote for any right-winger loon is a vote for more 2001-2009 bs . Who could be so completely stupid as to really want repeat that disaster ? Well Duh ! DON’T VOTE FOR A GOP !! BIG MISTAKE !! THEY ARE REVERSE ROBIN HOODS , THEY STEAL FROM THE POOR TO GIVE TO THE RICH .

Posted by: Hal_3000 | December 10, 2011, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Please get a grip, FANDAELISISABOOB. You aren’t helping your cause by posting like a lunatic from the juvenile detention center. Ron Paul doesn’t stand a chance, so get over it and take that CAP LOCK off your keyboard. In short, post like an adult who is not meth, ok?

Posted by: Carol | December 10, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Isn’t Ron Paul like about 100 years old? If elected, he might die in office, or just become even more senile than he already is. Not that Obama deserves 4 more years — he definitely doesn’t. But Ron Paul? No way. Some people have really lost touch with reality. I guess the Obama drones and the RP whack jobs have that in common.

Posted by: Max | December 10, 2011, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Obama has proven to be the arrogant, condescending used car salesman that we all knew he would turn out to be.

Posted by: whining liberal | December 10, 2011, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

“FANDAELISISABOOB, an elementary lesson of posting: those who post lengthy rants in ALL CAPS are either A) in Junior High School, or B) Overly histrionic and perhaps nutty as can be. Either way, they are not to be taken seriously. Good Luck. Try again when you have something half-rational to say.”
Posted by: Jimmie
Funny, and very true. Obviously.
Let’s not, however, give Obama another term to help us commit national suicide, which is all he’s done.
But Ron Paul is not the answer — unless the question is: “How to get a whole new set of severe problems to replace the ones we have now”

Posted by: Torbjorn Holmberg | December 10, 2011, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I love these anti-paul supporters…..do you realize a vote for Obama or any of the other GOP candidates is a vote for more war and more confiscation of our liberties and more corruption from the banker controlled Congress and office of the presidency. Instead of lodging insults at supporters of Dr. Paul, why don’t you educate yourself and post comments that are factual. Dr. Paul wants to end the illegal and unconstitutional Federal Reserve. Dr. Paul wants to bring our troops home to protect our borders and end the illegal wars and cease the gouging of the taxpayer from the military industrial complex like Halliburton and Brown and Root and the big oil companies. Do you people understand the facts? Not one of the other GOP candidates nor Obama will do what is necessary to return this country to the constitution which is how its greatness was built. If you don’t agree with Dr. Paul and his supporters, tell us why you want more war and more corruption from the Wall Stree/Banker controlled Congress? Tell us why you think all of the GOP candidates except for Dr. Paul have received hefty contributions from the big banks…as well as Obama. Do you think things will change with Obama or any of the other GOP candidates?? Obama voted for the illegal banker bailout and has increased military action. All of the other GOP candidates want to continue the wars and continue the criminal private Federal Reserve. Please people….educate yourself and stop being brainwashed…or at least post a comment that refutes the facts of what is happening and been happening in this countries for years

Posted by: The Facts | December 10, 2011, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

dan | December 10, 2011, 10:17 —- conveniently… the baby has no vote!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | December 10, 2011, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Kim , there’s a difference in facts , and talking points . All I personally see in your posts are your FOX imbued puppet/parrot opinions which are more commonly now in the colloquial , as “talking points” . It’s easy to say things like ” his dreadful performance thus far” , but until that opining is backed up with the empirical “whys and hows” , your base argument / assertion (i.e. Obama sucks , in general ) sounds less of something a pragmatic thoughtful adult voter would say / type and more like something a petulant angry
Bush/ Cheney voter might attempt to convince others of in a public forum , in a all-too-common conservative disingenuous ploy to divert attention from who the REAL crooks are , onto the good hearted (D) clean-up crew who is trying to help the sick , the poor, hard working Americans , and the unemployed as well .That is NOT the GOP / Tea Party , that’s for sure. They are the ones who are blocking the Consumer Protection Bureau from opening and trying to cut out the payroll tax holiday for middle class Americans , just read the news if you can do so objectively and honestly Kimberly , which I doubt.

Posted by: donpaulricardo | December 10, 2011, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

I’m still laughing out loud at the oxymoronic dichotomy that is the Republican mantra: “Government is too intrusive in our personal lives.” THEN, the Republicans in Congress try to pass laws restricting what a woman can do with her own body and whether two adults can marry. It’s that Orwellian double-speak that makes Republicans look like the loons they are.

President Obama may not be 100% acceptable to all Democrats but he is vastly superior to 100% of Republican candidates.

Posted by: AnaHadWolves | December 10, 2011, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Scared Obama supporters trying to discredit Ron Paul, it’s embarrassing. Ron Paul is in the top 3 now, tied for 2nd. The Grinch and FlipFlop Mitt support the corrupt “Patriot” Act and undeclared Wars. They want to expand Patriot Act powers and support the terrible NDAA bill. Meanwhile, Ron Paul has fought for the American people for 30 years, advocating sound monetary policies, ending the Wars, Auditing the Fed, ending the multi-billion dollar Drug War and repealing the Patriot Act. Ron Paul fights for peace, prosperity and liberty.

He is the only GOP candidate who supports reducing the size and powers of the Federal government, allowing the states to vote for themselves what laws they enact, instead of having their money taken away and given a portion back with rules & regulations attached, like the Dept. of Education forcing No Child Left Behind on states or get none of their money back if they don’t comply. Ron Paul is the only hope we have for restoring peace, prosperity and liberty to the American people.

Posted by: Mike Ikeo | December 10, 2011, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

More of the usual BS from the MSM.

Dr. Ron Paul IS the GOP Front Runner. The rest ARE irrelevant.

He is who We The People want NOT the Neo Conservative War Mongerers.

Ron Paul and ONLY Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Dawn Marie Clark | December 10, 2011, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

I will vote for the candidate that promises to abolish lobbyists and the Federal Reserve. Anyone who follows one party or the other is a follower. Simple as that. Why are neither of those issues ever brought up in these debates? Status quo. We do not have a candidate that that will serve the American people. Stock up on food, water, and anything you need to defend yourself, or you’re pretty much screwed

Posted by: Jim | December 10, 2011, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

All of these candidates look good to me and I am proud that we have such qualified candidates. I certainly hope for the sake of the American people that we are blessed with a new president.

Posted by: Rhonda | December 10, 2011, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I’M 79 YRS OLD BEEN MARRIED 56 YRS. AND I HAVE NEVER COMMITED ADULTRY, TRY ASKING ANY ONE OF THEM I9F THEY CAN SAY THAT. I THINK RON PAUL SHOULD RETIRE, HE’S TOO OLD. I DON’T BELEIVE GEINGRICH. RIGHT NOW LIKE ROMNEY , MAY CHANGE.I

Posted by: JOE HAVANAS | December 10, 2011, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

I would like to know more about the new American embassy in Iraq with 17,000 civilians! Is this true?

Posted by: Common _ Sense | December 10, 2011, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Let me first say, that the usual Democratic bias of ABC was not obvious in this debate, which I appreciated. The moderators did their jobs well, allowing reasonable latitude to the candidates, and the questions were all reasonable and relevant.

Thanks ABC for doing a very good job, in the presentation of this debate. It will further the ability of the voters to make decisions that are meaningful.

The overall tone of the debate was good. The candidates handled their differences with civility, which I appreciated, as well.

I did not feel there was any significant rank change, among the candidates for me, but I was again impressed with how Gingrich handled himself, and how he dealt with his critics.

I do think Romney did one of his better jobs, but his “bet” offer to Perry, was inappropriate in that environment. otherwise he handled himself as well, or better, as any other debate, but I would still not score a “win” for him, as I did not score any better than a tie for “win” in any other debate. One other issue for me, was his criticism of Gingrich’s comments on the Palestinians, as I happen to agree 100% with what Gingrich had to say on that issue.

I see the leaders as Gingrich, Romney, and Perry, in that order. I suspect, that is unlikely to change, but there is still time, as there will be another debate on Thursday, where someone might make a serious mistake.

I do think it is time to get the best possible candidate. We really shortchanged this country, by putting a weak President, with few skills, into office, at a critical time in our economy, and that bad choice, has to go.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | December 10, 2011, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

please stop playing the games you people are playing. look at your polls. it is painfully obvious that ron paul is the candidate that people want. stop trying to push morrons, stiffs and washington scum down our throats. we are tired of the lesser of 2 evils, we finally wants “good”. Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!!

Posted by: victor vidal | December 10, 2011, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

A person wrote: (It is interesting! I have made comments in several sites and those passionate supporters of Ron Paul never reply or rebut my comments when I point the following:)
Here are my answers to your previous post as I understand them.
1. Ron Paul is the most conservative of the candidates because abiding by the Constitution of the United States is all about being conservative.
2. On social issues Ron Paul follows the Constitution of the United States as he is sworn to do as an elected official
3. In matters of national security Ron Paul follows the Constitution of the United States
4. In foreign affairs Ron Paul follows the Constitution of the United States and the lessons of our forefathers who created the great Constitution of our country.
5. Ron Paul is not for terrorism. He believes that Americans who are being labelled as terrorists have the right to due process Guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. To take away that right leaves every single one of us at the peril of tyranny. That Once the government has the right to imprison us indefinitely without a trial and without the right to prove that we are not a terrorist, every single one of us is at risk of life imprisonment without any recourse or evidence.
6. Ron Paul does believe waterboarding is torture. And as a thirteen year veteran of the US Army, so do I!
7. Torture does not produce reliable intelligence because it is a form of coersion and threat. How many Americans have been badgered into confessions after days and weeks of “interrogation” only to find that they were innocent all along.
8. The “reports” are not going to show the people how often waterboarding is used against “our enemies” because it would paint a much grimmer picture than they want us to believe.
9. Ron Paul does not BLAME the USA for 9/11. He asserts that he believes what Bin Laden himself told us the reasons for 9/11 attacks were. One need only search on YouTube for “Bin Laden claims responsibility for 9/11”
10. Ron Paul’s views on our military: that our military was created to defend our nation and that as per the Constitution of the United States, war must be declared before invading a foreign land.
Ron Paul follows the Constitution of the United States of American as his GUIDANCE in all affairs. He listens to the lessons of those who fought in the Revolutionary War and those who knew that Big Government, Pre-emptive wars of Agression, and Meddling in the Affairs of other Nations would lead to the shredding of the Constitution and the destruction of our great nation.

Posted by: Lisa P | December 10, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Every American should ask themselves wether or not they believe in the Constitution of the United States. Every American should BOTHER to read the Constitution of the United States. Then they should look at what the creators of this great document have to say about what is happening in our country and what we are doing in the world today. Educate Yourself BEFORE you speak. And if you do not believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, perhaps you should find some other country to reside in.

Posted by: LP | December 11, 2011, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.