Women’s Groups Incensed Over Obama Morning-After Pill Decision

Shawn Thew/Pool/Bloomberg/Getty Images
ABC News’ Cecilia Vega reports:
Some of the same women who helped President Barack Obama win the White House in 2008 now say they may be angry enough to stay home in 2012 in the wake of a controversial decision to block the over-the-counter sale of the morning-after pill to girls.
“My computer was burning up with people saying, ‘I am done,’” said Judy Waxman, vice-president of health and reproductive rights for the National Women’s Law Center. “The fury is really unmatched in anything I have seen.”
Obama told reporters yesterday he supports an unprecedented decision by U.S. health secretary Kathleen Sebelius to overrule the Food and Drug Administration’s plan to allow the contraceptive pill, also called Plan B One-Step, to be sold without a prescription to people under 17.
“As the father of two daughters, I think it is important for us to make sure that we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine,” Obama said.
The president said Sebelius could not be confident that a 10- or 11-year old would not walk into a drugstore and buy Plan B “alongside bubblegum or batteries.” He said he did not speak directly with her before she overruled the FDA.
That decision—and the president’s comments– infuriated some women’s groups.
“His statements about Plan B yesterday are condescending. They’re disempowering and frankly they communicate sex discrimination,” said Erin Matson, National Organization for Women vice president. “In saying that he thinks he knows what’s best for women … and then [he] goes on to trivialize emergency contraceptives … What we are talking about is women who have up to 72 hours to prevent a pregnancy that they do not want.”
If taken soon after unprotected sex, the drug significantly reduces the chance of pregnancy.
Matson said the decision is “much more like what you would see out of the George Bush administration.”
In 2008, Obama won 56 percent of the women’s vote, 13 points more than Republican Sen. John McCain, according to the national exit poll.
And according to a recent Gallup poll, 45% of women approve of Obama’s job performance, compared with 40 percent of men.
But Waxman, of the National Women’s Law Center, where Obama addressed a sold-out crowd last month, said women could still be angry come next November.
“I am concerned that this is his base,” she said. “We hear lots of noise about how women could determine this next election. Certainly women in his base and the type of women he’s going for, and independent women are not happy with this decision.”
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
seems like these women groups, are the ones that the Obama Administration were listing as homegrown terrorist…Imagine…. threatening the president that they were staying home on election day…not very nice at all
Posted by: Those radical women groups | December 9, 2011, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Are we supposed to believe these women would vote for Mitt or Newt? Gingrich’s surge still lacks women supporters– so now would be good time to remind voters that the former Speaker is on marriage No. 3. and read the Esquire profile,Newt Gingrich: The Indispensable Republican.
“”He believes that what he says in public and how he lives don’t have to be connected,” she [Marianne Gingrich] says. “If you believe that, then yeah, you can run for president.”
“”Will he run?” Marianne asks. “Possibly. Because he doesn’t connect things like normal people. There’s a vacancy — kind of scary, isn’t it?”
Posted by: Kimberly | December 9, 2011, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
So, is it more dangerous for a 10-16 years old female to bear a child–a child having a child? In a perfect world children wouldn’t become “single” moms on welfare either. BTW, it’s amusing how quickly NOW is so vocal on this issue but is silent when a Sarah Palin and her ilk are victimized in the MSM.
Posted by: jonnie | December 9, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
You’re angry because you can’t kill anymore babies? How shocking! Too bad we can’t come up with something to slow down people’s sex drive. Quit your whining and find a way to explain to people that sex isn’t necessary everytime they go out with someone. Common sense seems to be a rare thing these days.
Posted by: VLStrickland | December 9, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
These are not really ‘womans’ groups though, are they? They are rather groups that advocate for, promote or profit from abortion and contraception. Many ‘womans’ groups applaud this decision. By and large, woman (and men for that matter) do not want their 10 and 11 year-old children getting access to over the counter contraceptives.
Posted by: Ollie | December 9, 2011, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Did these women groups just now realize that Obama is not Caucasian? For shame!
Posted by: Don | December 9, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Incensed, saying no costs nothing, and the government doesn’t have to do anything, and no one has to provide NO to you. You want to use sex as a fun pass time, you pay the piper when the best laid plans fail.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | December 9, 2011, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
There is science and there is common sense. If Plan B were freely available over the counter to young children, who’s to say they wouldn’t assume it was just the “go to” form of birth control—which it certainly isn’t. There are definite side effects and risks. I am pro-choice, but it was the right decision. If you aren’t by law old enough to consent to sex (i.e., statutory rape), you aren’t old enough to make this kind of “choice” without some adult involvement.
As for NOW, I honestly don’t know whom they purport to represent, but they certainly don’t represent the majority of women and haven’t for a long time.
Posted by: ARR | December 9, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
What makes you think parents would approve of 10 and/or 11 year old children having sex in the first place, Ollie? That said, if I had a 10 or 11 year old express a need for a Plan B pill, you better believe getting and making sure they took it would be the first thing I would do. A 10 or 11 year old’s body is not ready to carry a pregnancy to term without short and long term ill effects for the 10 or 11 year old. The second thing I would do would be to put them on birth control till I could get the situation under control and eliminate a need for Plan B. After that I would do the equivalent of grounding them for life or other punishment.
Posted by: whatever | December 9, 2011, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Oh for hell’s sake. Where I live, Plan B has always been over-the-counter and I live in a damn backwards-ass Eastern European country.
Posted by: Mari | December 10, 2011, 4:47 am 4:47 am
Barak Obama: Just another D.I.N.O. closet Conservative.
Posted by: thomas mc | December 10, 2011, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Now thats B/S those baby killers will vote for Obama your are spinning ABC.
Posted by: daniel | December 11, 2011, 8:03 am 8:03 am