Jan 10, 2012 3:18pm

Ron Paul Defends Romney, Lashes Out at His Critics

In an exclusive interview outside a Manchester polling place, Ron Paul lashed out at fellow Republicans for making unfair and ignorant attacks on Mitt Romney’s business record.

“I think they’re wrong. I think they’re totally misunderstanding the way the market works,” Paul told me. “They are either just demagoguing or they don’t have the vaguest idea how the market works.”

Paul also came to Romney’s defense for saying “I like to be able to fire people.”

“I think they’re unfairly attacking him on that issue because he never really literally said that,” Paul said.  “They’ve taken him way out of context … He wants to fire companies.”

In Paul’s view, Romney is right to say that he created jobs by restructuring companies.

“I think they’re way overboard on saying that he wants to fire people, he doesn’t care,” Paul said.  “You save companies, you save jobs when you reorganize companies that are going to go bankrupt. And they don’t understand that.”

Read more about voting in New Hampshire on primary day.

SHOWS:

User Comments

“I think they’re unfairly attacking him on that issue because he never really literally said that,” Paul said. “They’ve taken him way out of context. … He wants to fire companies.”

No, he DID literally say that. Maybe he MEANT “fire companies”, but what he literally SAID was “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me.” Maybe Paul literally doesn’t know the definition of the word literally.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“In Paul’s view, Romney is right to say that he created jobs by restructuring companies.”

I wonder if anyone has taken the time to tally up all of the jobs Romney and Bain created versus all of the jobs they destroyed. It would be interesting to see a side by side comparison.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Paul is that honest he won’t even play the slippery game the rest of them are. He refuses to twist Romney’s words and meanings and use them out of context.

It’s common knowledge that the people that make up Obama’s administration are the exact same ones who are funding Romney’s campaign. How come no one is bringing that up? Everyone is screaming about how they want Obama out, but Romney’s policies are almost exactly the same even according to the Wall Street Journal and he’s funded by the EXACT SAME PEOPLE!

People seriously think Romney is going to be any different than Obama? Are people really that blind and dumb? I can’t believe it.

Posted by: PD | January 10, 2012, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Does anybody know what Rombey and his people woulld say if Obama had said something like that? Also, Mr. Paul does not understand what Rombey and Group did to Gingrich in Iowa. Was that fair? not that I am a Gingrich fan but when Ron Paul is talking about being unfair to Rombey, he should also consider what Rombey does…..it was a payback time and Rombey provided the opportunity.

Posted by: Mike | January 10, 2012, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

I am no Mitt fan, but I agree with him. In fact, I fired a person who sold state farm insurance in favor of another person who sold farmers insurance at a more reasonable price. It’s called a free market.

Posted by: a realist | January 10, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I’m no Mitt fan either, but I understand what he meant. Think of it this way; you have your kids in the public school system, and their teacher is a freakin Marxist lib Obamatron, feeding you children’s mind with all kinds of garbage, and you have to spend countless hours deprogramming them from all of that BS. Boy, you’d like to fire that person, wouldn’t you? But you can’t because you don’t have the power to do so. Get it now?

Posted by: Rupert Pupkin | January 10, 2012, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Even though I hate Mitt Romney, Ron Paul is technically right on this. It’s just politics. Bain Capital engaged in extractionary finance — it’s not illegal in this country. I just don’t want a guy like that as president.

Posted by: JustinRR | January 10, 2012, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Paul for president or we independents go third party and split the vote. You nominate the real conservative or your RINO gets defeated.

Posted by: NowSwimBack | January 10, 2012, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

ron paul would eliminate the IRS and people laugh at him.
ron paul would privatize Social Securtiy when people are FORCED to pay a tax to a bankrupt-ponzi scheme that states:”in 2014, we begin paying more in benefits than we collect in taxes”.
republicans and democrats hate him because he unites both parties.

It’s not left vs right…..it is government vs you.

and yes, dr. paul is a republican but he had to run for one of two teams……
like the gambinos and the geones’s…..so long as they don’t take each other out, they always maintain power.

vote ron paul. stop laughing. or you get what you deserve.

Posted by: jdub | January 10, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Dr. Paul is not going to lie, even on election day about an opponent. He is the only honest man running for office and that is why his supporters support him.

Vote for Ron Paul please.

Posted by: David Infinger | January 10, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Easy for Santorum to say since he’s been living off tax payers for most of his adult life. He wouldn’t know corporate inefficiencies unless it meant reductions in his campaign contributions or lobby perks. I don’t like Romney either (or any of the GOP bunch for that matter), but I think A Cynic Reply has it right–inefficient companies can’t retain or create jobs.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | January 10, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Ron Paul should be honest and run as the Libertarian he is. He seems to feel the only audience can get is from the wing nuts on the right in the Republican Party. The GOP establishment doesn’t want him, the conservatives are afraid of him, he needs to establish his own base by instituting a third party bid.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

It says volumes about Ron Paul’s class and Newt’s total lack thereof.

Free markets for free men!!

Posted by: Luke | January 10, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

PD, believe it. Apparently people really are that dumb. I mean they do listen to people like limbaugh, hannity, beck, o’reilly, etc.

Posted by: Larry | January 10, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

This line of attack at Romney is wrong. There are a lot of things to be disagreeable with Mitt about but this isn’t on of them. I applaud Paul for his stance.

Posted by: Craig C | January 10, 2012, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

What would be interesting, would be to see how many people lost their jobs under Obama… and compare that to how many people lost their jobs under Romney. Oh, crap, this is ABC. I’ll look elsewhere.

Posted by: KevinVA | January 10, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

@A Cynic: “I wonder if anyone has taken the time to tally up all of the jobs Romney and Bain created versus all of the jobs they destroyed. It would be interesting to see a side by side comparison.”

In the case of restructuring a company, each job that is retained through the restructuring is a job “created”. If Bain laid off 20% of the work force during any given restructuring, then they retained 80% of the jobs, by virtue of not letting the company go out of business.

Posted by: Dave H. | January 10, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

If a company is going to fail, everyone loses their jobs. If a company can be saved by firing half of the people and restructuring, only half of the people lose their jobs.

I don’t like Mitt Romney, but this is how the market works.

Posted by: Jason | January 10, 2012, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

It’s common knowledge that the people that make up Obama’s administration are the exact same ones who are funding Romney’s campaign. How come no one is bringing that up?
Posted by: PD | January 10, 2012, 3:38 pm.

No one is bringing it up because it isn’t true.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

People are getting upset about fire yet the first thing they want when they go to a store or restaurant and don’t get what they want is someone’s job. This is no different. Why should any company be required to keep all of the employees of a company they bought? Look at GM. Unions said they stay, GM said we go bankrupt. Now we have a corporation that is still 26% tax payer owned, sucking down hundreds of thousands of dollars per vehicles in subsidies and holding billions of tax payer dollars that we will never get back. Life’s tough, companies fail/die, pick your boots up and move on. If you are entirely disabled, there is a job out there somewhere that you can do.

Posted by: Jonathan | January 10, 2012, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Can’t believe how so many post here are so ignorant of the facts. Romney was comparing Obamacare to private health insurance companies and if they (private cos) do a bad job he can fire them and get another company. With Obamacare you are stuck with the gov service and nothing else. If you don’t know what you are talking about don’t post.

Posted by: Ron | January 10, 2012, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

That’s jsut another example of how GOOD a man Ron Paul is. Sure, he could have joined in with the others in unfairly attacking Romney and mischaracterizing his words and deeds. But Ron Paul is not dishonest like the others. He sees what is going on. These attacks by Huntsman and Gingrich are complete garbage and we all know it. Good for Ron Paul for coming out yet again on the side of honest, ethical politics! He may want to beat Romney, but he’s not going to smear and lie to do it. And he’s not going to use the tactics of the leftists to do it either (unlike the other “men” in the race).

Posted by: Pup | January 10, 2012, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

A politician so honest that he doesn’t take a swing at his opponent while he’s down?

Imagine that.
RON PAUL 2012! FTW.

Posted by: anonie_moss | January 10, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Romney did say the words attributed to him, but anyone who reads the line without going back to the full quote will not understand what Romney meant. If you are a truthful person, you will go read the full quote before you decide how to interpret it.

Further, do some research about corporate giving to politicians. Private equity firms, including Bain, have been extremely supportive of Democrats, in addition to Republicans. Its convenient for left-leaners to put that fact aside, but it is a fact.

Posted by: Joe Goshbin | January 10, 2012, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Paul is saying be critical of his policy flip flops, be critical of his lack of trustwortiness, be creitical of what he says he wants to do even, be critical of the policies he put in place in ma, but don’t be critical of stuff he did in business for doing what sometimes has to happen in a free market.

You’re jumping on Mitt for the wrong stuff when there is PLENTY to get on him about that is legitimate and relevant.

Posted by: J williams | January 10, 2012, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

I read the books Blowback by Chalmers Johnson and The Creature From Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin to get an in depth understanding of Ron Paul’s economic and foreign policy views. Ever since I’ve been a believer that his views are spot on.

Posted by: sovereign | January 10, 2012, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

The sad part is the number of people who are clueless what a PE company is, or what aVC company is, or the difference between the two…but they are still going to weigh in with their opinion. Guaranteed Romney saved and created more jobs than he closed down. Bain doesn’t make it;s money buying companies and closeing them. Nobody does. Bain makes it money by buying companies and restructuring them. Yes, that often times meaning closing unprofitable branches, etc. But it is done to save the company. Sometime you have to amputate the arm to save the patient. Capiche?
I don’t much care for Ron Paul, but he does know more about this stuff than any of Romney’s critics.
Me? I am an investor and realize that there wouldn’t have been anymore Staples without Bain, There wouldn’t have been any more Burger King without Bain, etc, etc…

Posted by: Southern | January 10, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Here we have Left Wingers and the Media attempting to divert people’s attention from substantive issues. Romney said… “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me”… Ok, who wouldn’t? In a free market the ability to make choices regarding providers of goods or services forces those providers to compete for your business by providing better value. Those who don’t get “fired”. For the Left to try to make this a “gotcha” moment is pathetic.

Posted by: free_2_choose | January 10, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Lets all give a swift kick in the rear to the TWO PARTY POLITICAL MACHINE and vote for the Distinguished statesman from Texas Ron Paul.

Posted by: Pamela T Jensen | January 10, 2012, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

This is an extraordinary move by Ron Paul — to tell the truth and distance himself from Gingrich. He sets him apart from everyone. On election day, instead of attacking Romney when everyone else is, he defends him.

Posted by: JustinT | January 10, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

In the NH debate:
Romney says, “We need to do what’s best for AMERICA’S INTERESTS (AKA CORPORATE
INTERESTS, but Romney won’t say that because it sounds dirty. Also Obama said these SAME words before going into Libya and no one knew about it or voted for the invasion. So much for keeping “America” updated and letting us know what OUR interest is before we have a chance to even vote for it.)

Paul says, “We need to do what’s best for the PEOPLE’S INTERESTS”

Gee, which sounds more honest and FOR THE PEOPLE and NOT FOR THE CORPORATIONS???

RON PAUL 2012!! Restore America NOW!!!

Posted by: NC | January 10, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

The good Doctor is right, when your mechanic does a poor job on your car, you go to another shop.. you fire him.. if enough people do the same thing he goes out of business. The same thing goes with landscapers, store clerks etc… now if we can only have the courage to do it everyone in Washington! For the record, I would not vote for Romney today.

Posted by: Freedom Lost | January 10, 2012, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

A touch of class….I’m not an RP fan (yet) but finally a Gentleman in Politics. Well done Dr. Paul

Posted by: David | January 10, 2012, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

How exactly is Paul ‘lashing out’ ? Considering the amount of noise around him, I can’t see how he could have answered that question any more calmly.

Posted by: FarSide | January 10, 2012, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Ron Paul is so awesome! Keep it up, Dr. Paul! Legalize the Constitution!

Posted by: RonPaulKicksAss | January 10, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

I can’t understand the logic of Romney supporters. They say, “he is the only one who can beat Obama and right now all I care about is anyone but Obama.” How can the sheeple say that? Have they even looked at Romney’s record? He is practically Obama + 2. Why in the world would you want to vote for someone who is EXACTLY like Obama if not worse to beat Obama and expect change? Where are their brains at? Where is the logic and common sense in that? I just don’t get it. That’s like saying, “I don’t care about which murderer wins as long as it is not the first
murderer” or “I want to vote for the second murderer and not the good guy because I know that he is the only one who can beat the first murderer.” WHHHAAAATTT?????!!!!! Supporting and voting for someone else just as corrupt and incompetent as Obama (such as Romney) is not going to save our country. WAKE THE HECK UP!!! TWO WRONGS DON’T MAKE A RIGHT!!! Plain and simple!

Posted by: NC | January 10, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

This is just the MSM’s way of trying to not be biased and to not make people think that Romney has clear sailing by the MSM. Regardless, it doesn’t matter because everyone knows Romney is a Republican Obama. Vote RON PAUL 2012!!! Restore America NOW!!!

Posted by: NC | January 10, 2012, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

How about helping the company out so that no one loses their job, instead of restructuring the company to make your own profit as Bain Capital does.

Mitt denounced the auto-bailout that saved hundreds of thousands of jobs. GM could have went bankrupt, companies like Bain Capital could have bought GM stock at pennies on the dollar and restructured with half the work force and half the production. They would have made a huge profit.

Last month GM passed Toyota as the largest selling car company in the world and by the end of the year will be out of debt, including the bail-out and is hiring people.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

What a bunch of biased viewpoints using half-truths to make a point. EVERY company that is bought out equals jobs saved .. at least for awhile. It’s always a risk buying any company that is going under, hoping to bring it back. But if you can buy a company for 10 cents on the dollar, fire half the people, make it profitable, and sell it for more than it costs to bring it back, you make a profit and jobs are saved. If someone does that 10 times and fails half the time, they are still making money and at least providing the employees with jobs longer than if the company outright failed. *THAT* is how things work, and have been working that way for hundreds of years.

Romney was specifically talking about an insurance company when he made that statement, so anyone who thinks he is talking about people in general is delusional.

Posted by: JohnF | January 10, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I am shocked, SHOCKED to see that the OWS people do not like Mitt Romney.

Posted by: John | January 10, 2012, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Huntsman believes the New World Order is a conspiracy theory and that Hamas was not created by Israel and that that was a conspiracy theory too. Let’s see, GHW Bush and Newt admitted to the New World Order and most senior officials in the military as well as politicians stated that Hamas was indeed created by Israel. Do the research, “Hamas created by Israel”. You will find at least ten links. So who is sane now?

He plots his presidential campaign against Obama while serving as Obama’s man in Beijing.

He is also endorsed by HENRY KISSINGER, which should setoff many alarm bells NOT to vote for him.

Huntsman is about as conservative as Karl Marx. He’s a vehement climate change believer, a firm ally of Harry Reid, has strongly opposed the Tea Party movement and to top it all off, he’s a former Obama administration official.He is described as “Barack Obama’s secret weapon” by some conservatives and is likely to drop out of the GOP race, run as an Independent and take enough votes away from whoever turns out to be the Republican candidate in order to ensure
Obama’s re-election. He even failed to get on the VA, IL and AZ ballots, making him as unelectable as Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum.

Huntsman is going to be used by the MSM, the same way they used Rick Santorum in Iowa. They need someone to derail Ron Paul from first or second place so he doesn’t get near Romney. It’s that simple. Next election in South Carolina, it will be Rick Perry and then Newt again in Florida.

DON’T let the MSM win. DON’T let them choose the candidate for you. Choose the people’s champion. VOTE RON PAUL 2012!! Restore America NOW!!!

Posted by: NC | January 10, 2012, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Mitt’s superpac spent MILLIONS to wipe Newt out in Iowa – now Newt has a little superpac of his own to fight back and Romney is whining – and Paul thinks he can beat Romney BUT Newt’s already eaten RUN Paul’s lunch! If you can’t take the heat, GO HOME and whine!

Posted by: LADY CON | January 10, 2012, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Could we see a Romney/Paul ticket in the making? Would send shivers down the spine of Obama. If only Mitt could come round more on Paul’s way of thinking…politics does make for strange bedfellows as the saying goes ;)

Posted by: truthwillsetyoufree | January 10, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Useful Idiots! It’s a critique for Romney to want the ability to fire someone he is paying, to HIRE someone else that will do the job better? Do you want to keep ATT if they overcharge you and don’t give you coverage where you live? What about Verizon, if they don’t live up to the value of your dollars? You should be forced to keep paying them and not allowed to take your business to the competitor?! ARE YOU ALL DRUGS!?!?!

Posted by: Joe Johnson | January 10, 2012, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

first he said he would fire the company. how many of us have stop going to a store because something happened you did not like, or change doctors, because you lost confident in them and even decided you to buy Sony over Philips, its about the ability for people to have choices. Second, if you know anything about the corporate world he has done nothing wrong.

Posted by: Consteg | January 10, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I believe the good Dr. Is supporting the idea of the free market system, and fortunately for Willard Dr.Paul is a gentleman and a statesman.

My rhetorical question is, would any other candidate do the same?

Posted by: tipofthespear | January 10, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

First, even if Romney is taking liberties with his numbers, there is no WAY he has lost half as many jobs as Obama.

Second, I like to fire people who are giving me bad service or unacceptable products … or simply fire them because someone else is offering something better. Anyone who LIKES crappy service or ridiculous prices SHOULD support government monopolies of industry.

Posted by: xJonx | January 10, 2012, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

that was classy of you Dr. Paul ,thanks for being honest,Cant you people see that the powers that be want Mitt Romney to win?..they are going to continue to tell you that he’s the best candidate to beat Obama. yeah right…a guy who isnt even smart enough to figure out what a joke Mormonism is,a 5 year old could figure that out,we’re being suckered again,smarten up and dont fall for it,our country is hanging in the balance,we cant afford another fake elitist snob politician like Romney.the guy couldnt even beat McAin last time around!!!!…we can do better

Posted by: todd | January 10, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

If there is EVER a ROMNEY/PAUL ticket, I would vote 3rd party and would refuse to vote for Ron Paul or support him ever again as he would be a traitor to everything he has stood for as Romney has ALWAYS been. A positive and a negative would make a negative total.

VOTE RON PAUL and RON PAUL ONLY!!!!

Posted by: NC | January 10, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

It’s just absolutely astounding to see a candidate — on election day — tell the truth about his opponent, and DEFEND his opponent, on an issue the other candidates are running wild with. Ron Paul has just gotten my support and my vote. Wow.

Posted by: Jerry B | January 10, 2012, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Ron Paul speaks the truth, whether it helps him politically or not. This is why I love the man!

Posted by: ak | January 10, 2012, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

@A Cynic – most of romney’s 2008/2012 top contributors were obama’s top contributors in 2008/2012. a simple google search can give you the facts.

Posted by: Steve | January 10, 2012, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

As a Romney supporter, I give major props to Santorum and Paul for carrying out their campaigns with dignity and integrity. I will support any of the three over Perry/Gingrich/Huntsman.

Posted by: Tyler | January 10, 2012, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

A CYNIC: “No, he DID literally say that. Maybe he MEANT ‘fire companies’, but what he literally SAID was ‘I like being able to fire people who provide services to me.’”

Companies are made of people, so that’s indeed what he said. He’d like to be able to fire companies that provide him services. This is how the free market works.

When there’s nothing to criticize, the critics make things up. Somebody’s desperate . . .

ROMNEY: “It also means if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn’t give me the good service I need, I’m going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me.”

Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2012, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

In the case of restructuring a company, each job that is retained through the restructuring is a job “created”. If Bain laid off 20% of the work force during any given restructuring, then they retained 80% of the jobs, by virtue of not letting the company go out of business. Posted by: Dave H. | January 10, 2012, 3:55 pm.

Thank you for that. In all the research I’ve done on Bain and Romney, I am not finding anything that specifically states they ONLY took over distressed or bankrupt companies. For example, in 1992, Bain Capital purchased American Pad and Paper, which subsequently laid off 250 workers at an Indiana plant and rehired some after slashing their wages and retirement benefits. Or In 1993, Bain Capital bought the company GST Steel, which later filed for bankruptcy protection and closed a steel plant in Kansas City, and a string of smaller companies also ran into trouble after being acquired by Bain Capital. Nothing I found indicates these companies were bankrupt, or going into bankruptcy. Until after Bain aquired them, that is. Their website states they are a “private investment firm managing approximately $66 billion in assets”. I DID find that, as Governor of Mass,. Romney ranked 47th in job creation. So politically, he wasn’t much of a ‘job creator’.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

What other candidate has come to the defense of Romney on this issue? Newt Gingrich for one knows how markets and businesses work but his mind is clouded by anger and he will say whatever it takes to bring down Mitt Romney. It takes a guy like Ron Paul to see this and speak out. It goes beyond politics. RON PAUL 2012!

Posted by: Wal Man | January 10, 2012, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Good for Ron Paul! He just earned a bunch of brownie points.

Posted by: SVB | January 10, 2012, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Too bad the Republican Party will not pick Ron Paul to run for president. This will be his third failed run at the White House. Always the bridesmaid, never the bride.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

@ A CYNIC,

Wow. And you don’t want to have the power to fire people that provide you services? You would rather it be dictated, which is what he was talking about. Don’t act like you don’t know that.

You literally wrote “all of the jobs Romney and Bain created… would be interesting.” You literally wrote that. Was it out of context? Well, apparently that doesn’t matter.

Posted by: dp | January 10, 2012, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

“I wonder if anyone has taken the time to tally up all of the jobs Romney and Bain created versus all of the jobs they destroyed.”

Bain destroyed no jobs that weren’t going to be lost either way. If Bain bought a failing business and laid off 75% of the people that worked there in the way to saving the company, he actually SAVED the other 25% of the employees’ jobs. That’s what Paul is referring to.

Posted by: mtanous | January 10, 2012, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Looks like PD, and maybe Luke and others think 2 wrongs make a right. That if Romney once stuck it to Newt unfairly, misrepresentation and lying to Americans become appropriate responses?

Those who remain against Romney for his work experience are falling into one of Bastiat’s fallacies (the seen vs the unseen), in assuming that what they see is all that exists. All they see is the companies that got sold off, not the ones that bought the pieces and became stronger and hired more people, or made American stockholders more money for their IRA’s, or at least just provided better product/service for consumers.

Posted by: UncleSim | January 10, 2012, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

The list is nearly endless – since he keeps saying them – of borderline and outright treasonous things Obama has said but let’s focus on a businessman stressing he likes the fact he is not beholden to a service provider unlike the rest of us slobs who are going to be beholden to our geniuses in the Fed Gubmint for our healthcare decisions.

Posted by: Fred | January 10, 2012, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Oops, looks like I mistakenly shifted the names on posts… I erroneously called out PD and Luke, but I should have called out the ideas of Mike, and perhaps Larry and others. Sorry.

Posted by: UncleSim | January 10, 2012, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I don’t have a problem with Romney I have a problem with his being in a major cult(the Mormons) I will not vote for him he is too much like Obama. If Romney is the Nominee Obama gets re elected. And Ron Paul’s forteign policy is a joke he doesnt get it about Islam.

Posted by: no Mormonfan | January 10, 2012, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Funny that it was a reporter from ABC News that wrote the original story that took Romney’s words out of context by only reporting a portion of his sentence when the headline read “Romney likes to fire people”. Now it is ABC News that follows up with Ron Paul stating the obvious, that Romney’s words were reported out of context. Worst partisan reporting I have seen this election cycle yet. I’m sure that we can expect more political hit jobs by the three major network news organizations.

Posted by: Tom | January 10, 2012, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Ron Paul is a candidate with principles and discipline. That is why he has many followers.

Posted by: Judy | January 10, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Well played, Mauer!

Posted by: Brian | January 10, 2012, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Paul is defending Romney when he was the one that started all the negative attacks and continued with his lies and half truths during the campaigns.

Posted by: Capn Jack | January 10, 2012, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Ron Paul never stops shooting himself in the foot…he just doesn’t know how to play the running-for-president game…he stands up for Romney…he just doesn’t get it…

Posted by: RalphF | January 10, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

I’m a retired guy who is too lazy to read all the comments so I expect this has already been said. Sorry in advance. The issue with restructuring companies really isn’t about how many jobs were created or how many employees were fire.

Posted by: ed | January 10, 2012, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Ron Paul is a class act. We would do well with him as president.

Posted by: zack | January 10, 2012, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

From NC: “How about helping the company out so that no one loses their job, instead of restructuring the company to make your own profit as Bain Capital does.
Mitt denounced the auto-bailout that saved hundreds of thousands of jobs. GM could have went bankrupt, companies like Bain Capital could have bought GM stock at pennies on the dollar and restructured with half the work force and half the production. They would have made a huge profit.
Last month GM passed Toyota as the largest selling car company in the world and by the end of the year will be out of debt, including the bail-out and is hiring people.”

Dear NC,

You obviously do not know anything about markets. If Bain helped the company out, just for the sake of employing people, then the company itself would likely be losing money (hence being run inefficiently), Bain would not have the money to acquire new failing companies (companies going bankrupt, etc.), and Bain would not be in business very long. In relation to Romney’s criticism about the government saving the car industry, you obviously show your ignorance regarding the difference between government efficiency (or inefficiency) and market efficiency. Also, GM is only the top car company in the world because Toyota and Honda’s businesses were disrupted due to the tsunami and resulting parts shortages (as well as the fact that the Chinese like Buicks for some unknown reason).

Posted by: Micks9 | January 10, 2012, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

This is more garbage stirred up by media, and look how it’s causing more heartburn among right-side voters! Regardless of your choice of candidate, if you are Republican, you probably understood all along what Romney meant. If you are offended by the remark and think he really means that he “loves to fire people”, you are probably a Democrat, in which case you ain’t voting for Romney anyway.
Me? I like the Constitution. I like Ron Paul.

Posted by: Mike | January 10, 2012, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

“It also means if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn’t give me the good service I need, I’m going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me.” Stop taking things out of context and grow up.

Posted by: James Drago | January 10, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

Ron Paul wins again by simply being honest. How can you not like this guy r what he stands for? In fact, his foreign policy, which is where he draws the most criticism, may simply be honesty to a fault in the arena of politics. Driven by the Constitution, I couldn’t ask for a better candidate. The more I read about what Ron Paul says the better he looks for President!

Posted by: Charles Goines | January 10, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

How many other canidates defend their rivals on principle? This shows you that he would never violate the Constitution.

Ron Paul would make a fantastic President!

Posted by: Captain Obvious | January 10, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Let’s put this in perspective. Bain Capital bought up companies that were FAILING and turned them around. They were going down, and likely headed for everyone in the company losing their job. For example, let’s suppose a company has 10,000 employees, and all those jobs are in jeopardy. Let’s suppose Bain buys the company and instead of everyone losing their job, 6,000 people are able to stay on and continue. I don’t think it’s fair to say that Bain Capital caused 4,000 people to lose their jobs. A more appropriate statement would be that they saved 6,000 jobs.

Posted by: PaulH | January 10, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I get really tired of those who get their education from TV and endlessly criticize the George Washington and Ron Paul foreign policy. Do some research for Pete’s sake. It works! Bombs and bullets don’t work. If you want to fight Islam and 1.5-billion Muslims I recommend you do so in the free market place of ideas where lives are saved rather than lost.

Posted by: BillNM | January 10, 2012, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

I like what RP has done here.

I’m really tired of the old media telling me on how to view canidates, the silly propaganda games they play, the selective story telling and/ or editing. Enough of the bullsh*t. They don’t like RP because he threatens to expose these communist clowns by going after all the fraud, waste, abuse, bad policy, graft, and corruption that they have failed to report on for years (decades). I hope he continues to go after them more often- we are all owed at leasst that.

Posted by: xman | January 10, 2012, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

I ABSOLUTELLY LOVE TO FIRE PEOPLE IF I NO LONGER HAVE NEED FOR THEIR SERVICES!

Unions hate that kind of talk, real people understand it.

Stupid people criticize it.

Posted by: Cardiac | January 10, 2012, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

A CYNIC: “Nothing I found indicates these companies were bankrupt, or going into bankruptcy. Until after Bain aquired them, that is.”

That doesn’t mean they weren’t headed that way. They wouldn’t invest their money with the expectation of it going down the toilet. Sometimes bankruptcy and other such reorganization is just what’s needed to get a company back on their feet. It’s not difficult to understand, unless you are trying to be over-critical. Trying too hard at that . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2012, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

He didn’t “create jobs.” He bought failing companies, robbed the taxpayers of “bailout” money, then laid people off and pocketed the spoils. What he did is called corporate piracy. There is nothing impressive about it. The man never made anything. Never created any jobs. He also signed gay marriage into law as governor.

Posted by: Eric | January 10, 2012, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

The Left’s attack on Romney regarding this “fireing” comment is pure political SPIN. He was clearly refering to insurance companies. But had it been individuals who provide services that he was refering to–SO WHAT. In a free market you can change Dentists or Hairdressers. You “fire” them and find someone more competent. The Left would like to change the conversation from real issues–like the national debt is now equal to GDP.

Posted by: free_2_choose | January 10, 2012, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Once again the grownups in the media are in absentia. The sheep and parrots pick up on what you “report”. None of this blatant misrepresentation serves any useful purpose whatsoever.

Posted by: jcarob | January 10, 2012, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Ok, sorry cynic. He didn’t mean that Obama literally wants everyone to be stupid. Obama really doesn’t care one way or the other about that (or any other topic beyond his own career). He meant that the people who tell Obama what to do want everyone to be stupid consumers. And Obama is happy to work with the rest of the sellout “Democrats” and “Republicans” in Washington to make that happen. An educated populace could catch on to the tricks that Washington plays to appease their corporate sponsors. And then they might start trying to vote the sellouts out of office. And that would cause all kinds of trouble!

Posted by: Joe Mama | January 10, 2012, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Jonathan Karl vulgarly, partially quoted Mitt Romney to damage him “Paul also came to Romney’s defense for saying “I like to be able to fire people.” That was a fragment of a sentence. The entire sentence was contained in this statement “.That means the insurance company will have an incentive to keep you healthy. It also means if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me.” Jonathan Karl proved that he is dishonest and unethical. He partially quoted Mitt Romney, because he fears that he will be the most formidable opponent of his hero, Barack Obama. Shame on ABC for employing a dishonest reporter.

Posted by: Todd | January 10, 2012, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I have no use for Romney. He is little more than an empty suit (same as Obama) but to beat him up because a group he is associated with goes about salvaging dying businesses is ridiculous. This is just normal business practice. I know it goes against the grain of war mongering neocons and brain dead liberals everywhere, Ron Paul is right on this one, just as he is on most other items.

Posted by: Desmond McGuilicutti | January 10, 2012, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

ERIC: “He bought failing companies . . . then laid people off and pocketed the spoils.”

They would have been all laid off permanently had Romney and his company not intervened. Don’t they deserve something for saving the company and the jobs that would have went down with it? You have to try to not understand this stuff.

ERIC: “There is nothing impressive about it.”

Those that kept their jobs would disagree.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2012, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

“Romney did say the words attributed to him, but anyone who reads the line without going back to the full quote will not understand what Romney meant. ”

ABSOLUTELY CORRECT!!! But, ah… see how the snake comes back to bite you in the butt? This was the same exact strategy the opposition used against the President with Rev. Wright’s comments. His words were taken way out of context and to this day ithe incorrect interpretation sticks with many. Now…if this sticks with Romney (Paul may see this and is trying to help him out) then he may have a problem trying to get the correct interpretation across.

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 10, 2012, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

I can’t stand Willard Mitt Romney, but his comment was completely taken out of context. He was referring to insurance providers. Being able to fire them and find someone who provides a better service. Who doesn’t like to fire someone who provides substandard services?

Full Context:

“I want people to be able to own insurance if they wish to, and to buy it for themselves and perhaps keep it for the rest of their life and to choose among different policies offered from companies across the nation. I want individuals to have their own insurance. That means the insurance company will have an incentive to keep people healthy. It also means if you don’t like what they do, you can fire them. I like being able to fire people who provide services to me. If someone doesn’t give me the good service I need, I’m going to go get somebody else to provide that service to me.”

Additionally, Ron Paul is correct about restructuring companies in order to turn them around. If that means getting rid of unprofitable units, however unfortunate that may be, the fact remains that you cannot allow unprofitable units to drag down the entire organization. Look at all the jobs lost at Solyndra. Case closed.

Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Crazy_Redneck | January 10, 2012, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Saying ‘I like to be able to fire people’ is not the same thing as saying ‘I like firing people’.I would have to agree with what Mitt said. If someone is doing a job or a service for me and they are doing it POORLY or in a half ass manner,I would like to be able to fire that person and replace them with someone who could do the job competently.EXAMPLE: I would like to fire prez Obama……

Posted by: rockerdon | January 10, 2012, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

When I hear Ron Paul supporters I notice something.
They’re almost always youngish males. They mostly sound like fast-food assistant managers (or trainees) who are proud of their high-school educations. Their understanding of complex issues resembles the depth of an oil slick.

Posted by: ABQBOB | January 10, 2012, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Takin’ the high road. Wise decision. If it’s between Paul and Romney, Paul wins in a landslide. The others are just parasites allowing Romney to win.

Posted by: nate | January 10, 2012, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Look, just because Ron Paul defended a couple of points about romney (and I don’t even know if the quotes used in this article are in proper context) that does not mean Paul supports Romney in any way. He has plenty of negative things to say about Romney, thus he does not need to resort to lying about the man. Newt likes to say Ron Paul “makes things up” or exaggerates, but all Paul does is point out the facts and lets the people make their own decisions. Which irritates the other candidates to no end.

Posted by: xCipher | January 10, 2012, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

we should just make firing illegal, and stick it to the far Right.

Posted by: apetra | January 10, 2012, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

This is ridiculous. He said something we’ve all done. If I don’t get good service from my mechanic, dry cleaner, restaurant, etc., I ‘fire’ them. I don’t use them any longer. That was his message. Fire a service provider who isn’t getting the job done. It’s called the free market.

Posted by: Calling BS | January 10, 2012, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Ron Paul is a class act. And for the person that claims RP supporters are low paid young males, I’m a high paid person in the IT industry with decades of experience, and not so young.

I just like the idea of us following the Constitution, call me crazy.

Posted by: Rick | January 10, 2012, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“@A Cynic – most of romney’s 2008/2012 top contributors were obama’s top contributors in 2008/2012. a simple google search can give you the facts.”

LOL!!!! Maybe… maybe not! There are so many partisan blogs on there now you don’t know what you are getting nor from where. Google has almost (in my opinion) become a joke when trying to locate factual data quickly.

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 10, 2012, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

boo hoo hoo, poor Mitt doesn’t like to be taken out of context, boo hoo hoo-WGAS!…this the same Mitt Romney who used old 2008 campaign footage wayyyyyyyyyyyyy out of context to disparage Obama…spare us Ron, your boy Mitt is too thin skinned and lame…stop the hypocrisy then Mitt, be real, show your authentic self, if you’re able….

Posted by: jay | January 10, 2012, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

LMFAO @ RON PAUL DEFENDS MITT ROMNEY …..DUDE U CAN STOP TRYING TO MAKE RON PAUL SUPPORTERS BACK MITT ROMNEY IT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN WE DONT FLIP FLOP LIKE MITT ROMNEY DOES

Posted by: THE REAL DEAL | January 10, 2012, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

well im not a big fan of politics wait no i hate politics i just need too get the answer for mii homework soo can u guys hurry up and count the votes fast!!!! thanxs^_^

Posted by: andrea | January 10, 2012, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

No surprise that Ron Paul who is a radical liberal, even more liberal than Obama, would defend the other liberal flip-flopper Romney.

Romney has flip-flopped on abortion, gay marriage, global warming, and Obamacare throughout his career. And Paul doesn’t even try to hide his liberalism which I give him credit for. At least Paul is honest and straighforward about being a ultra liberal.

Out of the 7 candidates currently running for president, including Obama, Ron Paul is the only one who advocates legalizing every drugs there is including cocaine and heroin. None of them except Ron Paul advocate legalizing prostitution, which is why a group called Nevada Prostitues recently endorsed Paul. None of them except Ron Paul advocate repealing the Patriot Act in the name of a silly conspiracy theory, i.e. the government wants to spy on every man, woman and child. This would eliminate the powers that the Justice Department has to fight terrorism. None of them except Ron Paul support major slashes in the defense budget almost eviscerating our military strength. Only two of them, including Ron Paul, are strongly in favor of abortion on demand for any reason and publicly payed for.

Posted by: Max | January 10, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

This is a smart move politically for Ron Paul. We’ve seen how well such a line of attack has worked for Newt, that is to say not at all.

Posted by: Hobble D. Hoy | January 10, 2012, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Bain bought companies that were already in trouble. Blaming Bain or Romney is misplaced. Blame the management team they replaced. Besides, whatever Bain did is better than government “investing” taxpayer money in losers like Solyndra or the Chevy Volt.

Posted by: JJinCO | January 10, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Out of the 7 candidates currently running for president, including Obama, Ron Paul is the only one who advocates legalizing every drugs there is including cocaine and heroin. None of them except Ron Paul advocate legalizing prostitution, which is why a group called Nevada Prostitues recently endorsed Paul. None of them except Ron Paul advocate repealing the Patriot Act in the name of a silly conspiracy theory, i.e. the government wants to spy on every man, woman and child. This would eliminate the powers that the Justice Department has to fight terrorism. None of them except Ron Paul support major slashes in the defense budget almost eviscerating our military strength. Only two of them, including Ron Paul, are strongly in favor of abortion on demand for any reason and publicly payed for.

Posted by: Max | January 10, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I am starting to believe Ron Paul supporters when they say that there will never, ever, ever, EVER be another Ron Paul in American politics. It’s hard for me to agree on everything Ron Paul says, but there is something otherworldly about his consistency and integrity. Romney/Paul 2012. Let Romney do the political game while Paul cleans up D.C. in the Cheney role. Can’t ask for a better compromise to unite the party against Obama. I would love to see Paul destroy Biden or Hillary in the debates, and if something happened to Romney, I could live with a President Paul. He’d at least follow the Constitution, that’s for sure!

Posted by: Dan | January 10, 2012, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

No surprise that Ron Paul who is a radical liberal, even more liberal than Obama, would defend another liberal flip-flopper Romney.

Posted by: Max | January 10, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

This is the first time that Ron Paul has made sense.

Posted by: BDouglas | January 10, 2012, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

“Bain bought companies that were already in trouble….”

That’s not true. They also bought companies which were worth more broken up in parts than as the one established company.

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 10, 2012, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Ron Paul has more class than many of his supporters do. Earlier today on other news sites I saw hords of Paul supporters ranting about Romney wanting to fire people. It’s too bad that it takes Paul speaking the truth to get his own supporters to speak the truth.

Posted by: Al Martus | January 10, 2012, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Ron paul has integrity! He will not twist words, even for his own benefit. He can easliy badmouth Romney here, but because Ron is a genuine human being…he treats Romeny with respect, and fairly!
I must admit, I am impressed by this man!
RON PAUL!!!! 2012!!!

Posted by: mqira | January 10, 2012, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

How do the Romney supporters explain he is different than Obama when his biggest donors are the same banks donating to Obama?

Posted by: June | January 10, 2012, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

@MAX
Thanks for pointing out that Ron wants to repeal the Patriot Act…What a noble idea! Have you now decided to vote for him. I mean here is a man who doesnt even know you, and he is fighting for your rights!
I noticed you mentioned he wlao wants to legalize every drug…. You are doing what the media has been trying to do. Well, lets clear things up! He is (again) fighting for our liberties, our freedoms. Think about this…marijuana was legal when America was founded, Washington grew it, so did Jefferson. Out of out 44 presidents, 12 have smoked it (one didnt inhale…lol) thats 27% of our presidents have smoked it, yet out gov’t claims it makes you crazy! Anyway back to his reasons….we spend billions on the “war on drugs”, yet we (remember the Iran-contra affairs) secretly engage in drugs trafficking too. We spend all this money on a war that will not succeed. So why not educate people, rather than imprison them, because people who do these drugs in their own home, do not hurt you or me. And if they want to do drugs, they will regardless if it is legal or not….and by legalizing it, we can effectively stop the dangerous drug dealers. just like in prohibition…also it is about our civil liberties, and again if drugs were legal, would you start doing drugs Max? Please do not twist his ideas…thats like saying Newt want to murder everyone with his HR4170 bill!

Posted by: mqira | January 10, 2012, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

give me a break, some of you folks don’t know how the private sector works. It’s not a charity, you don’t stay in business simply because you’re a good sport. It’s no wonder why O.B.A.M.A. got elected, he’s a symptom of the stupidity that runs rampant in this country

Posted by: Taylor | January 10, 2012, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Lots of brainiacs here today! Never have so many said so little with such horrendous ignorance! Wonder if ANY of them actually understand what CAPITALISM is? They probably can’t even spell the word. Guess the Welfare state is more suitable for the “whining” class. And Mitt Romney “is the same as obama” ? What have you people been smoking? Pathetic…GO MITT ROMNEY!

Posted by: Marianne | January 10, 2012, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

cynic wrote: I wonder if anyone has taken the time to tally up all of the jobs Romney and Bain created versus all of the jobs they destroyed. It would be interesting to see a side by side comparison.
_____________________________________-

I wonder if anyone has taken the time to tally up all the jobs Obama allegedly created versus all of the jobs he’s destroyed.

Posted by: RealityCheck | January 10, 2012, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Ron Paul is an honest man. I do not like Romney because he is a liberal. Newt is full of bull and the only one I could support is Santorum and he has no chance to win. Hello third party again for me as I did not vote for McCain as I am a conservative and dislike Rinos and liberals.

Posted by: rockychance | January 10, 2012, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Wow, what a stretch. I want to ‘fire’ companies that provide services for me if they are not doing a good job. Who doesn’t? He’s not saying he personally wants to shut down the company, he’s saying he wants to give the individual the power to choose which company he uses. The only people who would disagree with this are union or government workers. They are the ones that believe in monopolies.
To the same cynic who wants to compare how many jobs are saved vs jobs lost is not looking at an accurate picture. The companies he bought were already in a death spiral and would have lost all the jobs without restructuring, unless of course you have a government job where you are encouraged to be incompetent and unproductive (That’s not hyperbole, I know many people who went from the private sector to government and every one said the same thing)>

Posted by: Ann Banisher | January 10, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Ron Paul is to be commended for his integrity. We’re lucky to have him as an honest broker in this discussion. He has also impressed me with his respect for the Constitution. Where I stop short of wanting him to be President, however, is when I consider that I have no idea of what he wants for the United States, what path he wants us to take. Yes, I know he seems to always know what our limitations are, and he often points out that we shouldn’t be doing thus and so. But what does he want to accomplish. I get the feeling that he would allow everyone to do whatever they felt like without any objection on his part. Thus every country would have an agenda but us. And their agenda would be to accumulate as much of the wealth and power of our country as they could. And how would they do this? By hook or by crook. Sneakily or by force. At some point in time, it is ever and so, we always have to say, I can’t let you do that. I’m just not certain Ron Paul understands that this is our responsibility, to stand up to the bullies of the world, whether we like it or not. He can be a libertarian but he has to exhibit testosterone.

Posted by: Maverick | January 10, 2012, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Most libs hate successful business people because they are jealous of earned success, which they know nothing about, so they demonize those who achieve the American Dream to justify confiscating their money. Didn’t their daddies teach them how to compete and take care of themselves? Some of the critical comments about Romney expose such utter ignorance about our system it is mind boggling.

Posted by: Trajan Long | January 10, 2012, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Turnabout is fair play. Romney’s PACs put out untrue and false information on Newt, so Newt fires back and paints a new portrait of the almighty Mitt. I don’t know if I’ll vote for Newt or not, but Romney was the first to try to take out Newt with misinformation and distortion. The other candidates just joined in the fray. The sad thing is Mitt will probably win the nomination, which is sad, because, once again, the media will pick our candidate. I’m kind of tired of that crap. There are many reasons to not like Romney, but I will ALWAYS vote against the media’s pick. When are the other sheep in this country going to make up their minds without the media’s help?

Posted by: Tony | January 10, 2012, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

This Romney supporter now has greater respect for Ron Paul. His candor is refreshing. When Romney said Corporations are people, in talking about health care companies bad performance he said he would like to fire people, it somehow makes sense of if poor choice of words.

Posted by: cbk16 | January 10, 2012, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

I will support the nominee no matter which candidate wins. You people who say that you will split the vote if Ron Paul does not win the nomination will give the nomination to BHO once again. Many of you voted for him last time anyhow so it will not matter to you. Most conservatives will not vote 3rd party this time and split the vote, there is too much to lose.

Posted by: Don | January 10, 2012, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Perry and the Grinch need to bow out. They are beginning to sound like the ultra left wing of the Democrat Party. No surprise from Newt as he will blow anyway the wind is to get elected but Perry disgustingly surprises me!

Posted by: Don | January 10, 2012, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

I can’t wait until Paul is president and I can legally do drugs! I’m going to every drug at once!
My parents said I shouldn’t do drugs and showed me lots of evidence that nothing good comes from using but if they’re legal that means I should starting using them at once, like tobacco and alcohol!
So heroin, cocaine, crack, smack, uppers, downers, ludes, pot, meth, acid, crank, opium party the day after the election!
Who is with me?
Oh, and prostitution will be legal, so we can get some prostitutes!

…………. crickets.

Whats amazing is that some individuals believe that would actually happen.

Where are the people that were saying there would be mass shootings every day when ccw passed or the “assault weapons” ban expired? Again, the sad thing is individuals actually believed it.

Capitalism – a system of economics where 12 men decide in secret the value of their (not)federal (with no)reserve notes.

Posted by: Matt | January 10, 2012, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Does no one wonder why Paul is defending the one candidate that has the lead over him and has the greatest differences with him? Paul was always noted for running a lean campaign without the support of outside PACs – one that relied on volunteers over donations. MItt is the one candidate that has a greater difference of policy with Paul than any of the others. Yet in Iowa, one week before the caucus, Paul suddenly had a million dollars to launch a blistering, negative add campaign; smearing Newt Gingrich. Do you think it’s possible that some of Mitt’s friend were behind his new-found financial ability?
Now we see him defending the candidate in from of him. And what a surprise – it is Mr Moneybags Mitt!

Posted by: All4n | January 10, 2012, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Perhaps Dr. Paul – the most ignored runner-up in living memory – will be VP under President Romney. Maybe that’s why the two of them have been so relatively nice to one another.

Ron Paul supporters are a Godsend to the GOP, whom the Republican leadership should be actively courting and not taking for granted. The young people supporting Ron Paul can be and should be the future of the GOP (Libertarianism is a gateway drug to conservatism).

Unfortunately, it is in the very nature of conservatives (who rightfully own the party) to be clumsy, awkward and just plain bad at politics, and I could easily envision the Republican Party squandering this important opportunity in the same way they lost the black vote back in nineteen sixty something.

Oh, well, that’s how it goes.

Posted by: Charles Breeman | January 10, 2012, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

““I think they’re unfairly attacking him on that issue because he never really literally said that,” Paul said. “They’ve taken him way out of context. … He wants to fire companies.”

No, he DID literally say that. Maybe he MEANT “fire companies”, but what he literally SAID was “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me.” Maybe Paul literally doesn’t know the definition of the word literally.”

To “Critic”, the phrase, firing people who provide services” is implied that “people” are company representatives. It’s a shame people don’t have the ability to think beyond what’s in front of them. Another casualty of public education. Tsk, tsk.

Posted by: TargetZero | January 10, 2012, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Thank you, ABC, for saying that I am posting comments too quickly…and I have not posted a response to this article yet…because you would not allow it!

Posted by: poorhardworker | January 10, 2012, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Take a real deep breathe, all! Who in their right mind paying money for work to be done and it is not getting done…does not want to have the right to say “I will not longer pay you because you are not producing”? This is also a comment on unions! Merit deserves reward…sloth does not!

Posted by: poorhardworker | January 10, 2012, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

The frontrunners, who got there by hobbling the competition, start crying and forming a subgang when their noses get bloodied after they picked a fight. We have the icon of corporatism, Romney, teaming up with the antisemitic, abrasive, 9/11 truther with the most reckless and dangerous foreign policy and defense dropping Ron Paul, to sink Santorum and Romney with ugly, vicious, and dishonest attacks.

Frankly, Santorum has been the cleanest candidate and he’s earning my respect. Newt has tarnished himself with his reaction to the rotten attacks that devastated his campaign. Ron Paul has made himself alomost as unattractive as Obama. Romney is looking like a wise-butt with poor sportsmanship.

America has a short memory, but this election seems to be etching itself into those memories we’ll hold even when we can no longer remember our kids names.

Posted by: ObamaIsGodAwful | January 10, 2012, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

The mob doesn’t understand that the companies would have shed the jobs anyway. Ron Paul is a straight shooter too honest to take a sly little advantage of his opponent even in the heat of battle, instead he defends Romney.

What a fine President he would make!

Posted by: Floda | January 10, 2012, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

I think we now know who the real conservatives are in the Republican primaries, at least when it comes to business. Ron Paul called the liberal Republicans out – Gingrich, Huntsman, Perry. Ron Paul was absolutely right in his defense of private markets and capitalism. He pointed to those who really know nothing about free markets – yes Gingrich, Huntsman, Perry – none of you know how the free market works. You have never managed a business, and being a consultant to Freddie Mac is not managing a business, Mr. Gingrich. Trash talking free markets like the three of them did show their leftist leanings. If they get elected, they will trash the private sector like Obama, but perhaps not as bad. Regulations will be on the table with the three of them.

Thank you Congressman Paul for your astuteness and study of Austrian free market theory and Von Mises. Give Romney a copy of Von Mises’ Human Action. This is a good read for anyone wanting to know abut free markets and how they work.

I now know where my vote is going.

Posted by: Foyd | January 10, 2012, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Mitt’s a pacifist appeaser too, isn’t he?

Posted by: Iran Paul | January 10, 2012, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Spot on Jdub. Ron Paul is so principled that he comes to his strongest opponents defense. He could have stayed silent and hoped to gain support from this. He is the only candidate that will have the vigilance to follow through on making REAL cuts in government spending. We can’t afford another president to play the typical DC game. Only Ron Paul sees the impending debt bomb and dollar collapse. He has the vision to deal with it.

Posted by: vw paul | January 10, 2012, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Sounds like Mitt Romney has cut a deal with Ron Paul.
Romney will be the Presidential nominee, RP will be
the VP nominee.

And of course we won’t get the spending cuts ACROSS
the BOARD that Ron Paul proposes… we’ll only get
austerity measures like cutting “entitlement” programs
while spending massively on WAR.

Forget the 2 TRILLION DOLLAR LOAN that Bush took
against the Social Security SURPLUS and now is counted
as US Debt and spent on war profit margins for his defense
contract buddies.

This is the way the system works. They are all corrupt…
sell a bunch of promises wrapped in a SchMitt Sammich…
or Obama “Hope”, then the “other side” fights down all the
good things the people/citizens of the USA actually want
while passing only the crap people don’t want. Rinse/Repeat.

Then they pay a bunch of Astroturfers or fake commenters to
go online and monopolize every post, pushing a fixed propaganda
message.

Here’s the reality in simple terms.

Daddy and Mommy (GOV) wrote $15 Trillion in debt having a blast and
stuck you with the bill. The GOVERNMENT is going to DEFAULT on
the AMERICAN PUBLIC. (Not China, not the IMF)

So while Americans are being foreclosed on in record numbers, the
government will declare bankruptcy, keep all their assets, or print money.

Guess how much of your life will be spent working, paying taxes, to
pay down $15 Trillion dollars?? Without seeing any reward…

US Citizen = Indentured Servant

Posted by: Romney/Paul Ticket Eh? | January 10, 2012, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

No One But Paul!!!

Posted by: Jim S | January 10, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

This election is shaping up as to having just two choices: ObamaCare or ObamaCare.

Posted by: newjerseybt | January 10, 2012, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

A CYNIC said: “It’s common knowledge that the people that make up Obama’s administration are the exact same ones who are funding Romney’s campaign. How come no one is bringing that up? Everyone is screaming about how they want Obama out, but Romney’s policies are almost exactly the same even according to the Wall Street Journal and he’s funded by the EXACT SAME PEOPLE!”

Proof, source please.

Posted by: Buzz | January 10, 2012, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

A Romney/Paul ticket would obliterate Obama at Reagan vs Mondale levels.

Posted by: Frank | January 10, 2012, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I’ve been waiting for someone honest and smart enough to defend the idea of restructuring failing companies. When a company is failing that means that the economic resources embodied in that company are being squandered….they’re being used to produce things which the public doesn’t want, or they’re producing them so inefficiently that the value of the resources consumed exceeds the value of the output. By destroying (yes, destroying) these companies the valuable scarce economic resources are freed up to be put to a use that the public (the market) values. This is sort of like Obama complaining about ATMs displacing bank tellers, or Jesse Jackson Jr. complaining that Kindle and Nook are destroying bookstore jobs. You can’t fight the market: economic resources need to be free to be applied to their most valuable use.

Posted by: Tom A | January 10, 2012, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

It is comforting to know the republicans(lower case intended) have made room on the slate for senile dementia. They have covered all the bases, except for competent conservatism. Thank you, GOP, for helping BHO to a second term to complete the destruction of America.

Posted by: rawheadrex | January 10, 2012, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Mitts a chickenhawk. just like Newt.

Posted by: mike2 | January 10, 2012, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Shame on the left-wing liberal press for reporting on the left-wing liberal DNC’s view (representing our left-wing liberal president’s interests) that Romney “liked to fire people” as though Romney had a sadistic, gloating need to rob people of their livelihood for no reason at all.

At least, that’s how I took Romney’s comment when I first read it out of context. And I’m a Romney guy.

It only takes about 30 seconds in further reading his actual comments and a third grade education to see that this is not what Romney meant (or the man he is) at all.

This on the day before the NH election when there was no time for a rebuttal and the undecideds were deciding. They did the same thing to George H.W. Bush on the eve of the presidential vote vs. Clinton by reporting nationally that a woman had come forth claiming to have had an affair with Bush. Again, no time to rebut and the undecideds were deciding.

It’s my understanding that the affair was later proven to be a myth, but too late to help poor President Bush who was made a one-termer by Bill Clinton who, of course, turned out to be a bastion of morality. Heaven forbid we re-elect the adulterous Bush.

I’m not saying that Bush would have won re-election without this erroneous report, but it sheds light on how our beloved system works (as a legislative aide once told me – “it’s not perfect, but it’s only the best in the world”). It’s really a miracle we ever elect a Republican president.

I was pretty upset about all this until I read some of the comments above and realized the uproar was actually drawing more attention to the sham, and that Romney will probably come out the better for it. (Paul, too, for that matter – and rightfully so.)

Oh. Hmmmmm.

Is this a great country, or what?!!

Posted by: In-New-York-My-Presidential-Vote-Is-Meaningless-And-This-Is-How-I-Cope | January 10, 2012, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

To whom it may concern,
Paul supporters will not be manipulated. We will not support a GOP candidate other than Paul. Enough of the war mongering.

Posted by: Ty Cobb | January 10, 2012, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Paul doesnt attack Romney because the Rebublican machine didnt write that script. I hoped Paul is sincere and would undermine the Romney campaign but I suspect Paul will back out in the end. I pray Paul pushes forward thereby Obuma is reelected. Romney and Obuma have no business in the whitehouse. Republican scum are responsible for both. Americans are stooges of the media. Wake up you FOX and MSNBC watching imbeciles!

Posted by: aaron | January 10, 2012, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Liberal animals, we will defeat Barry in 2012. Romney will win the election and the left will be removed from power for a generation. Nothing you can do about it!!:))))

Posted by: Duh | January 10, 2012, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

To all of those that hold up Ron Paul as some sort of beacon of truth and integrity: Why, exactly, has he been in the Republican party all of these years?

Why not the Libertarian party? He had some ideological integrity in 1988 running under the Libertarian party, but not since.

The reason is simple: He gets lots of money from all of those “corporate interests” and “lobbyists” he claims to be against, plain and simple.

Posted by: The Bruce | January 10, 2012, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Ty Cobb
I am all for Ron Paul but if he doesn’t win the nomination and goes third party(which I doubt he would), I will not support him. This all or nothing attitude is not productive. Do you think the big government politicians take their ball and go home if they don’t get their way? They work in incremental progressive steps.
Another Obama term would decimate the country. Paul Ryan needs a republican in the White House. I wouldn’t mind seeing Ron Paul as Treasurey Secretary or Fed Chairman if he doesn’t win.

Posted by: vw paul | January 10, 2012, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Yep! I’d rather split the vote and vote for the guy I want instead of who the media wants. Paul has been blackbaaled from the MSM from the start, so only those who go looking for what he’s about is going to find out. Far as I’m concerned these RINOS are just one step behind the libs in charge now.

Posted by: joeh | January 10, 2012, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Bruce
Come on, you’re smart enough to know that a serious politician must operate within one of the two parties. He is also operating within a flawed system, a system he is trying to change. It is practically him alone that has been sounding the alarm about the Federal Reserve.

Posted by: vw paul | January 10, 2012, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I really really really really really really hope Paul either gets the nomination or that Romney gets it and Paul runs as a third party. Hope Hope Hope Hope Hope.

Posted by: CMBat | January 10, 2012, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

“Are people really that blind and dumb?”
Is that a trick question? A couple of quotes for thought:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State” & “what good fortune for governments that the people do not think.”
This election is not about the eonomy but rather about economics, namely Keynesian economics that has allowed the Government to beome the behemoth that it was not intended to be and as such, we are all suffering the “unintended consequences.”

Posted by: Joe | January 10, 2012, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

“Too bad the Republican Party will not pick Ron Paul to run for president. This will be his third failed run at the White House. Always the bridesmaid, never the bride.”

The reason the Republican Party will not pick Ron Paul is because they know he cannot win over Obama. The name of the game here is to defeat Obama in 2012 with who ever it takes in order to save this nation.

Posted by: Buzz | January 10, 2012, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

VW Paul said: “I really really really really really really hope Paul either gets the nomination or that Romney gets it and Paul runs as a third party. Hope Hope Hope Hope Hope.”

You want assurance that Obama will win I see.

Posted by: Buzz | January 11, 2012, 12:49 am 12:49 am

my god.. usually people cut out one short paragraph from a long interview, but a whole one to preserve context. it’s rare to see, someone cut one sentence from separate paragraphs then reorganize them together to fit neatly intertwining your own words.. called yellow journalism.
what does “romney is right to cut job” mean anyway? what is “right”? right as a practical CEO? right as a moral person? what is “right”? do you know how to be specific in your writing?

Posted by: jt | January 11, 2012, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Buzz
Not me. That was posted by CMBAT. Your name appears below your comment.

Posted by: vw paul | January 11, 2012, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Funny how Ron Paul insists that someone be truthful about Romney, while his campaign was running robocalls against Rick Santorum claiming he was anti gun and pro choice. (false)

Ron Paul goes on late nite shows and says Bachmann “hates muslims.” (False)

As Ron Paul’s super pac runs one of the most despicable ads using Huntsman’s daughter as a weapon, but suddenly demands others should be truthful?

Funny, Ron Paul doesn’t hold himself to the same standard that he thinks others should adhere to?

There’s nothing about Ron Paul’s behavior that should be admired.

Posted by: No One Important | January 11, 2012, 5:20 am 5:20 am

More reason to vote for RP. Who else would defend another politician/candidate.

No bad seed bears good fruit. Ron Paul is the only viable seed. If you collect money from special interest, you’re a bad seed. You CANNOT have the people’s best interest at heart when you collect money from special interest groups. Why is there even a debate about who is the best candidate?
BAD SEED = NO POTENTIAL FOR GOOD. WAKE UP!!

Posted by: chris | January 12, 2012, 12:02 am 12:02 am

What on God’s green earth is wrong with firing people if they’re not doing a good job? That’s what’s wrong with the workforce in this country, especially the public school system, we can’t fire people. I don’t want the government taking that ability away from me…if someone is not providing good service, or not doing a good job, they should be let go and someone who wants a job would be more than happy to have it.
Give it to me.

Posted by: Wolfe | January 12, 2012, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.