Jan 4, 2012 10:58am

Michele Bachmann Drops Out of Presidential Race

ap michele bachmann campaign wy 120104 wblog Michele Bachmann Drops Out of Presidential Race

Chris Carlson/AP Photo

Rep. Michele Bachmann suspended her presidential campaign after placing sixth in Tuesday’s Iowa Republican caucuses, she announced today.

“Last night, the people of Iowa spoke with a very clear voice, so I have decided to stand aside,” Bachmann said at a news conference, flanked by her parents, husband and five children. “I have no regrets, none whatsoever. We never compromised our principles and we can leave this race knowing we ran it with the utmost integrity.”

Bachmann said she will continue to fight the policies of President Obama, particularly his health care legislation, calling the 2012 election “the last chance to turn our country around, before we go down the road of socialism.”

She said she was motivated to stop Obama and not by a thirst for power. “Though I’m a congresswoman by title, a politician I’ve never been. … I’m not motivated by vanity, glory or the quest for power.”

Bachmann had staked her candidacy on Iowa, the state in which she was born and raised. In September, campaign manager Keith Nahigian called Iowa a “must win” state.

Bachmann placed last out of the six candidates competing here in Tuesday’s first-in-the-nation caucuses, receiving only 5 percent of the vote and losing in Waterloo, the town where she was born.

Iowa became the backdrop of her presidential bid when in June she announced her candidacy in her hometown of Waterloo.

It became the springboard for her stint, albeit short-lived, as the GOP front-runner after she secured the top spot at the Ames Straw Poll in August.

And today it became the insurmountable hurdle that ended her run for the White House after she finished dead last among the GOP candidates competing in the Iowa caucuses.

Bachmann, a three-term congresswoman from Minnesota, emerged on the national political scene riding the wave of Tea Party activism. As the founder of the Tea Party Caucus in Congress, Bachmann’s socially conservative, family-oriented approach initially captured the support of staunch conservatives and evangelical Christians.

Bachmann, 55, has five children of her own and has taken in 23 foster children.

She supports a constitutional amendment defining marriage between a man and a woman and opposes abortion under any circumstances. She came under fire in June after a gay patient treated at the Christian counseling center Bachmann and her husband own told ABC News that the clinic tried to “pray the gay away” using so-called reparative therapy.

She also took some heat after implying that the HPV vaccine, which rival candidate Rick Perry mandated as Texas governor, could cause mental retardation in young girls, a claim the American Academy of Pediatrics said had “absolutely no scientific validity.”

When it comes to the economy, which the majority of voters say is their No. 1 issue this cycle, Bachmann touts her experience as a “federal tax litigation attorney,” a.k.a. tax evasion prosecutor for the IRS.

Her tax code tag line is often that every American should pay at least some income taxes, rather than just 47 percent who currently pay them. Bachmann says that broadening the tax base will pay for tax breaks for high-income earners.

Bachmann’s 11-point jobs and tax proposal, the “American Jobs, Right Now” blueprint, also calls for ending taxes on repatriated profits and expanding domestic energy production.

She claimed that Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s flat-tax plan, which he announced in October, is an “imitation” of her plan.

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery; thank you Gov. Perry for using my ideas for your tax plan,” Bachmann posted on her Facebook wall shortly after Perry announced his plan.

After a similarly poor showing at the Iowa caucuses, Perry said Tuesday night that he will take a few days off to “determine if there is a path forward for myself in this race.”

By Wednesday morning, as Bachmann was announcing the end of her campaign, Perry hinted on Twitter that he will stay the course through South Carolina.

“And the next leg of the marathon is the Palmetto State,” Perry tweeted today. “Here we come South Carolina.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Good riddance! She was and is not qualified to run this country.

Posted by: Good | January 4, 2012, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Amen!

Posted by: Gunner_1959 | January 4, 2012, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Good decision, Michelle – we love you. Endorse Rick Santorum. Santorum is the real deal.

Posted by: Dan L | January 4, 2012, 11:11 am 11:11 am

She showed grit and was a credit to Congress. She took as well as gave during the debates. Her personal life is an inspiration.

Posted by: Marsh | January 4, 2012, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Good, glad she is gone. Although being the least qualified candidate, she stilll would have been a far more successful president than Obama, but to replace Obama, with a candidate just a few stones throw better isn’t going to improve anything.

Of course, a ham sandwich would be an improvement over Barack Obama…. in fact I think a ham sandwich has a better idea of how economics works.

Posted by: Corey | January 4, 2012, 11:12 am 11:12 am

I liked Michele Bachmann, truly did… but it seemed the powers at be in the Media marginalized her. Very sad.

Posted by: Charles | January 4, 2012, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Rather glaring omission that her campaign chief, Kent Sorenson, quit her campaign last week and endorsed Ron Paul.

Posted by: Ken | January 4, 2012, 11:14 am 11:14 am

uhhhhhhh………and the current guy wasting space in the White House WAS qualified???

Posted by: DOC | January 4, 2012, 11:14 am 11:14 am

That is just so sad hear (sarcasim). Can’t wait for more of them to drop out.

Posted by: Keli | January 4, 2012, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Sanatarium is only slightly better than she is.

Posted by: Denbo | January 4, 2012, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I would choose Bachmann over of Gingrich, Santorum, Romney, Perry, Huntsman.

But RON PAUL beats ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: George Washington | January 4, 2012, 11:15 am 11:15 am

According to the US Constitution, she is perfectly qualified to run this country. Why the lie?

Posted by: Mike | January 4, 2012, 11:16 am 11:16 am

She would have been a good president but too many other conservatives in the race had more experience than she has. I expect we’ll be seeing more of her in the future. Speaker Bachmann, perhaps?

Posted by: consam | January 4, 2012, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Are you people serious? Watch any of the debates? She’s an idiot.

Posted by: Dan | January 4, 2012, 11:18 am 11:18 am

“Bachmann says that broadening the tax base will pay for tax breaks for high-income earners.”

Uh, where exactly did she say that? Does the author of this article have a quote or a citation?

Posted by: james | January 4, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Gawwd… if you’re going to report something, get it right– Michele stated that she will broaden the tax base by creating MORE taxpayers– in other words, by creating an economy that will be friendly to business expansion, thus creating sustainable jobs and allowing people to move away from government dependence to independence-

Posted by: Psycmeistr | January 4, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Let’s face it, all politicians whether they are a Democrat or Republican will do and say anything to get the vote. Once in office, the tune changes and the political infighting among the parties begins and nothing gets accomplished.

Posted by: T | January 4, 2012, 11:22 am 11:22 am

I guess she threw in the towel on her new years resolution after only 4 days. Wow, that shows real conviction.

Posted by: Billy | January 4, 2012, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Goodbye and Good Riddance…..Next!!!!

Posted by: Wolffie | January 4, 2012, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Well, I guess the God she was hoping would help her finds that his followers are not enthusiastic about women candidates. hmmmm. Should have listened a bit more I guess. Maybe she’s “king” in her house, but apparently the voters don’t want her as their king. bye, bye.

Posted by: solsenz | January 4, 2012, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Frankly, she did better than I thought she would. She put-up a very good fight and is now smart enough to face reality. I can’t say anything bad of the woman; she can hold her head high.

Posted by: JungleCogs | January 4, 2012, 11:27 am 11:27 am

“Good riddance! She was and is not qualified to run this country.”

That comment from an Obama supporter? The man “occupying” the office is the LEAST qualified man ever to have been elected to the job. That’s based on his disastrous three years duing which time he has done more damage to our country that i ever thought was possible.

For an Obama supporter to say ANYONE else is unqualified is a sign of a severe mental disorder! This country cannot survive another four years of this inept, economically illiterate, radical, community organizer. We may not survive his first 3 years! Our debt is now 100% of GDP!!!
How do you possibly pay that off without HYPER-inflating our dollar!!!

Posted by: Tonymo | January 4, 2012, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Thank goodness I don’t have to listen to her voice anymore. Very irritating. Now let’s all support the rest of the Republican candidates who represent the values of all good, decent, God-fearing Americans — the right bunch. So what if they are a patriarchial group who have no problem telling women what, where, and how they can do with their bodies but scream like banshees if you tell them which lightbulbs to use. Personally, I know exactly what the hypocritical bunch can do with their lightbulbs.

Posted by: TXATTNY | January 4, 2012, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Hopefully someone will put a internet site together with the three front runners voting history for their entire political careers. I guarantee you that very soon after that there would only be one front runner. The only reason there is even a contest for the nomination is because the media is covering up the positions of two of the candidates because the truth would eliminate two of the three candidates in short order. Up until now, the Zionist controlled political process has owned every horse in the race so no matter who wins they have their man in the Oval office. Excerpts from Rep. Louis T. McFadden’s speech on the floor of the House of Representatives, June 10, 1932:
Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. …
Some people think the Federal reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers, foreign and domestic speculator sand swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders. …
Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia.They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia and thus drove a wedge between the Allies in the World War. …
Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its power but the truth is the Federal Reserve Board has usurped the Government of the United States. …
Mr. Chairman, when the Federal reserve act was passed the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which would make the savings of an American school-teacher available to a narcotic-drug vendor in Macao. They did not perceive that the United States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export. That Russia was destined to supply man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate–a superstate controlled by International bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.
Congressional Record, 72nd Congress, 1st session, June 10, 1932; Vol. 72, pp. 12595-12603. McFadden served as Chairman of the United States House Committee on Banking and Currency 1920 to 1931.

Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Stop going through life with blinders on. Your ignorance is sewing the seeds of your own destruction.

Posted by: aubreyfarmer | January 4, 2012, 11:31 am 11:31 am

It would be nice if ABC would take the time to point out the gaffes, missteps,broken promises and outright lies of Mr. Obama.

Posted by: CJ | January 4, 2012, 11:32 am 11:32 am

To those that think Rep. Bachman was not qualified to be president. You are fools, President Obama had zero experience or qualifications to be president and three years later, still lacks the skills or judgement required to run this country. In other words a failure in every since. As a matter of fact, someone like him would never get elected if it were not for Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society” purchasing a voting block for the Democrat party. If it were not for this redistribution to those that contribute nothing to the well-being of this country, the Demcratic Party would be a perenial minority party.

Posted by: larry | January 4, 2012, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Newt and Santorum need to join forces to defeat Mitt Obomney! Whichever one has the most delegates after the next few states needs to take the other one as V.P. and forge a united front against the Massachusetts liberal whose state ranked 47th in job creation under his watch. Hopefully Newt is at the top because we need his gravitas to debate Obama. We don’t want to waste his talent on Biden.

Posted by: JediJones | January 4, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Well fought, Congresswoman Bachmann.

Time to make it official and endorse the not-Obamney candidate: Senator Rick Santorum.

Posted by: Not Obamney | January 4, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am

There were SEVEN candidates in Iowa, which means Bachmann finished sixth with Huntsman finishing in last place. But please, don’t let the facts get in the way of your excellent reporting.

Posted by: mom29js | January 4, 2012, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Damn, that means she’ll be running again for Congress. And the people of her district have already shown that they are willing to re-elect her even after she showed herself to be a complete nutbag.

Posted by: prainva | January 4, 2012, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Finally some good news from the GOP!!!!

Posted by: RalphF | January 4, 2012, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I am a conservative who does not support your irresponsible deficit spending. You might be old and will be dead in 30 years, but people of my generation will continue to suffer from your deficit spending and unconstitutional imperalist/globalist wars which are not even self defense. I support the troops and our military personnel are the biggest contributors to Ron Paul’s campaign. Paul himself is a veteran, unlike Romney, who dodged the draft. Romney supporters are pseudo-conservative hypocrite liberals.

Put it this way, Who would you want for your boss? A man that has a net worth of 100s of millions, wants to send our children into endless wars, supports big banks and corporations, and believes that we should give up all our freedoms for safety. Or a man that gives back part of his pay check, does not use his medical benefits because he believes he can afford to pay out of his own pocket, wants to stop killing our children in endless wars that only benefit the rich, wants to put the hard earned money you make back in your pocket instead of giving it to the corrupt banks and corporations and restore your freedoms given to you by our for fathers along with the men and women that lost there lives fighting for those freedoms. This is a no brainer question. Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Latarian | January 4, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

How many passengers does that leave us in the GOP clown car now?

Posted by: RalphF | January 4, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Rep. Bachmann iwas and is more qualitfied to be President than Obama. Because she loves this country, she wanted to try to get it back on the right path. Unfortunately, she was unable to convince the voters that she was the most qualified this time but don’t count her out for good.

Posted by: Bob | January 4, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

It would be nice if ABC would take the time to point out the gaffes, missteps, broken promises and outright lies of Mr. Obama.
Posted by: CJ | January 4, 2012, 11:32 am.

Why would that be nice? And why post that here, in a story about Bachmann quitting the Republican race for the presidential nomination? If you really want that information about Obama, there are lots of web sites out there dedicated to such things. I recommend starting with the official Republican propaganda outlet, FOX.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 11:46 am 11:46 am

““Though I’m a congresswoman by title, a politician I’ve never been… I’m not motivated by vanity, glory or the quest for power.””

You are also unmotivated by intelligence, or the ability to think critically. A congresswoman is, by definition, a politician. Ergo, you are a politician. Have been for years. To try and deny this is to deny reality. Which apparently is something you are very good at.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 11:49 am 11:49 am

> “Though I’m a congresswoman by title, a politician I’ve never been… I’m not motivated by vanity, glory or the quest for power.”

Whatever. Just go away and be a fundamentalist fruitcake somewhere else, mmkay?

Thanks.

Posted by: Darrell | January 4, 2012, 11:53 am 11:53 am

“Last night the people of Iowa spoke with very clear voice…” Since Bachmann said God would decide the voting, shouldn’t she say: “God clearly showed he doesn’t believe I’m qualified to be President.”

Posted by: The_Mick | January 4, 2012, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Next in line to drop out is Newt Gingrich, then Ron Paul. So, then, if Romney wins the nomination, he might take Rick Santorum as a running mate. If Santorum secures the nomination, he might find someone else as a running mate. Now, Ron Paul might go on a tangent and run as a third party candidate, muddling the water for the GOP. Another unpredictability is the lose canon, Donald Trump who bolted from the GOP. He might decide to jump into the fray. Then it’ll be a messy, drawn out saga on the road to nomination. However, if the GOP think that they will beat Obama, they better think again, because it ain’t gonna happen. The Republicans who destroyed this country can never have another chance to do so again.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 11:54 am 11:54 am

I give her credit for perseverance, but how could she have not known that she was too far off center to actually make it all the way to the White House? She did open up a lot of dialogue, and create interest but she is not electable now or in the future with her current train of beliefs. She had a staff bolstering her along, and wasting her money – too bad she didn’t realize she would never make it. Now to the GOP please find someone worthy and strong enough to carry this country out of this current mess.

Posted by: independentthinker | January 4, 2012, 11:55 am 11:55 am

She effectively endorsed Romney too by saying her supporters “need to rally round the eventual nominee.”

This is Mitt obviously, thankfully. Whatever votes this brings, yay.

ROMNEY/RUBIO 2012.

Posted by: Carlos | January 4, 2012, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Very poorly written and clearly biased article. ABC news is pathetic.

Posted by: Mark Jackson | January 4, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am

uhhhhhhh………and the current guy wasting space in the White House WAS qualified???

POSTED BY: DOC | JANUARY 4, 2012, 11:14 AM 11:14 AM_____________Hey, Doc, what about the one before…I mean, the guy from Texas? LOL

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Yeah if anyone watched her debate performances – she gets this glazed look in her eyes and she’s clearly reading off of a paper in her mind. that’s likely how she passed the bar to become a lawyer — and then she used those skills…..

To PROSECUTE for the IRS!

See – people have principles and if you just look through their life – you can see them.

Another Bachmann example: You can look at youtube clips of her introducing Ron Paul as GOD, but then of course when she runs against him, suddenly he’s dangerous. Yeah uh huh. Princple.

Good moment during one of her debates was when she was asked a question and tried to immediately go into that glazed over mode — but then she realized she didn’t understand teh question and for a split second she was a normal human being and she said: “wait, what was the quesitons?” It was such a sincere question.

She heard it again and you could see her eyes click into place – and the glaze followed immediately and she began “reading from her memory” – but the moderator wanted to add a quick follow up and tried to interrupt – but like Obama and his telepromters – you can’t interrupt someone who NEEDS A SCRIPT –

It takes a lot of EFFORT to be deceitful. Like Judge Judy always says: When you’re telling the truth you don’t have to have a good memory – because you’re just regurgitating what happened. When you tell a lie, you have to remember all the tiny little details – much harder.

Notice Ron Paul is ALWAYS conversational, ALWAYS off the cuff, and according to FOX’S own body language expert: Full of Personal Integrity. Gotta Love it.

Goodbye Michelle – save an ounce of character by recommitting yourself to your former inspiration: RON PAUL!

Let’s go New Hampshire!!

Posted by: Samuel_Washington | January 4, 2012, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Thank god! Lets hope Romney can beat Obama. NOBAMA 2012! worst President in recent history! and one day Bush will be vindicated from the negative press he received and the truth will be known.

Posted by: ARMY_VET | January 4, 2012, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

It was an excellent statement, showing what an excellent person she is. She said that it was on March 21, 2010, the day of the passage of Obamacare, that she first thought of running for president, in order to stop it. From the start she has understood the transcendent issue of this election year: that either a Republican president and a Republican Congress are elected to repeal Obamacare and tear it up by the roots, or America becomes irreversibly an unfree statist country like the countries of Europe.

That was the great and central message of her campaign, but also its limitation. Running to appeal Obamacare and turn the economy around and constantly repeating that she was the most consistent conservative in the race were not enough as the basis for a winning presidential campaign. She needed a larger message about the direction in which she would lead the country as president, how she would “win back America,” how she would turn back the prevailing left, and this she never developed.

Posted by: Fred | January 4, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Just a Sarah Palin, Jr…never stood a chance

Posted by: Lily Bell | January 4, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Let’s face it, all politicians whether they are a Democrat or Republican will do and say anything to get the vote. Once in office, the tune changes and the political infighting among the parties begins and nothing gets accomplished.

POSTED BY: T | JANUARY 4, 2012, 11:22 AM 11:22 AM____________Shh, don’t say that, T; otherwise, they will hear it. American voters have a short memory. They swing like a pendulum to a politician who lies to them.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

“Bachmann says that broadening the tax base will pay for tax breaks for high-income earners.” I guarantee she did not say that. The media will never quit.

Posted by: Tim Norman | January 4, 2012, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen, Michelle was never in the race to begin with. Like that lady from Alaska, Michelle was in it because she thought she was smart and capable enough to serve in the role. She was sadly mistaken.

Posted by: Bob | January 4, 2012, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Bye,bye crazy lady. Oh, and take Perry with you.

Posted by: Indymind | January 4, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

MOM29JS: Yes there were 7 and Bachmann came in sixth BUT Jon Huntsman NEVER bothered to campaign in Iowa so in reality, Michelle came in LAST place. Very POOR showing considering she WON the straw poll a few months ago. As for worst President to OTHERS here: that IS GW Bush. The mess we are trying to dig out of NOW came about because of that REALLY incompetent man and his lying war. As for President Obama, he’s going to win again and despite all of you HATERS (what ever happened to ONE NATION UNDER GOD?) he will bring our Nation back from the depths that GW and his evil little helpers threw us into for 8 years. Now, you ALL SHOULD go for the most electable man in this horrid “FIELD” you call Presidential “Hopefuls” IF you truly want to beat the President.

Posted by: demNme5 | January 4, 2012, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

…..but but but….God told you to run for President.

Posted by: Solace Hoboken | January 4, 2012, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

That is just so sad hear (sarcasim). Can’t wait for more of them to drop out.

Posted by: Keli
___________________
Neither can I

The more of them that drop out early, the more united the Republican party will be and that will make it all that much easier for the frontrunner to kick Obama’s a___ this November.

Posted by: spike | January 4, 2012, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

BACHMANN, SHE IS A ONE TERM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE…LOL…LOL
BACHMANN, SHE IS A ONE TERM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE…LOL…LOL
BACHMANN, SHE IS A ONE TERM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE…LOL…LOL
BACHMANN, SHE IS A ONE TERM PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE…LOL…LOL

Posted by: Fred | January 4, 2012, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

The republican candidates (including Bachman and Perry) would have done much better if they used the tactics that the DNC is going to use against Romney. Don’t react to his meaningless 30 second sound bites and swipes at the President. Pin him down, make him defend his record and the idiotic 59 point plan he has introduced but never mentions.

Mitt is going to get outed as the corporate minion he is. He has no ideas except the same trickledown theory that has never worked and just helps to shrink the middle class. He will let the corporations run our country.

He hides what the American people already know, his exorbitant salary and bonuses from Bain Capital for restructuring companies by laying off thousands of workers. He hides the giveaway deductions on his homes. Because Mitt is the tallest Lilliputian among a group of Lilliputians doesn’t make him a president.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

___”For an Obama supporter to say ANYONE else is unqualified is a sign of a severe mental disorder! This country cannot survive another four years of this inept, economically illiterate, radical, community organizer. We may not survive his first 3 years! Our debt is now 100% of GDP!!!
How do you possibly pay that off without HYPER-inflating our dollar!!!

POSTED BY: TONYMO | JANUARY 4, 2012, 11:29 AM 11:29 AM______________LOL, it did under Bush till Obama came along to put the brakes on just at a time when things were almost over the cliff. Where have you been, my friend? With Bush the country was losing a whopping 600,000 jobs every month. With Obama, we are actually seeing job growth and you are calling someone “economically illiterate?” Man, you are either a fraud or you are a bold-faced liar. Take your pick.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

I guess God does not love her as much as Romney.

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2012, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

These writers had to get in a liberal jab and false premise inaccuracy: “Bachmann says that broadening the tax base [making everyone pay at least something] will pay for tax breaks for high-income earners.” What garbage these writers have spilled. That is not at all what her purpose was. It was, to borrow from Joe Biden, to “have some skin in the game.” Now these writers have twisted it around with their Marxist class warfare presumption, imputing her motive to only be giving tax breaks to high-income people.

When people earn money, it is their own first, not the government’s. But Bachmann takes the position that if everyone paid – even a nominal amount such as a dollar for the lowest earners – that they would be contributing and understand the cost of government is everyone’s. So when these writers state as fact that Bachmann’s motivation for taxing everyone was to give higher-income [i.e. the rich] a tax break, they are dead wrong in their premise and fact – another liberal distortion and trampling on the truth. Following these writers’ “logic,” if I went to the store and bought a quart of milk, I would be taking milk away from the milk supply for children.” The quality of journalism and critical thinking is so diminished today that politicians like Obama and his party, as well as these two writers, slip garbage past readers and listeners all the time without people catching their premise, meaning and lie.

Posted by: John Svengali | January 4, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Ron Paul will probably stay till the bitter end. It would be interesting who they set up as the next nominee. Most Americans are not conservatives or liberals, somewhere in between depending on issues. The right has veered to far right. If anyone believes that it doesn’t cost money to fund wars is delusional. We don’t even take enough in to fund them and our troops without credit.

Posted by: emerald_sparks | January 4, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Great American, Great Lady. Sorry to see her leave the race.

Posted by: Brodave | January 4, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

The “Queen of Rage” needs time off to have her nerves and blood pressure checked.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

“Good riddance! She was and is not qualified to run this country.”

Do you mean in that same way that Obama wasn’t qualified to run this country?

Heck, he was likely the least qualified candidate to ever run for POTUS on a major party ticket. BTW, he’s still not qualified to run this country and he’s a complete fraud. Hope he’s not your candidate.

Posted by: Calypso | January 4, 2012, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Another kook bites the dust and according to her she was chosen by God himself.

Posted by: David Simmons | January 4, 2012, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

LOL I wonder if she had to get her husbands permission to quit,

Posted by: garp | January 4, 2012, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Haha…..all you ragging on Michelle Bachmann (she isn’t my choice but that’s beside the point)…….who IS qualified to run the country? Obama?? Romney??? Gingrich???? Sorry guys but get real! We’re electing (or RE-electing) a turkey no matter who wins. When you rag on people like Bachmann, do it out loud, tape yourself, then play it back so you can hear how pathetic you sound. You can say “Bachmann’s this…” or “Bachmann’s that…”, but at least she knows when to shut the heck up!

Posted by: thatwasobvious | January 4, 2012, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

__”To those that think Rep. Bachman was not qualified to be president. You are fools, President Obama had zero experience or qualifications to be president and three years later, still lacks the skills or judgement required to run this country.”

POSTED BY: LARRY | JANUARY 4, 2012, 11:33 AM 11:33 AM__________I am confused, Larry: Are you talking about George Bush? Why don’t you say so?

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

One chickenhawk warmonger down,three to go.(Romney,Santorum,Gingrich)

Posted by: ed | January 4, 2012, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Someone commented “She is not qualified to run the country”. I have news for you, the President of the United states is called by the Constitution to serve us, We the People, by running only the executive branch of only our federal government and to command our Armed Forces. He/she is not to “run the country”. The country is run by us, We the People, by, in the aggregate, doing what we do in our daily labor and all other lawful and ethic activities We the People engage in the pursuit of our happiness and of overall strengthening our rights.

Posted by: Maria-Erlinda | January 4, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I wonder if the Men in Black will deport her back to her home planet now that she’s unemployed.

Posted by: dan | January 4, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Michele was the ONLY CANDIDATE that dared to call out the FACT that Barack Hussein has two Kenyan Illegal Alien Family Members living in the US, 100% on the US Taxpayers dime. Which remaining candidate will dare to take this point of argument to the remaining GOP debates, as well as to the debate when poised against Barack Hussein???

Posted by: Jane Smithfield | January 4, 2012, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Did you really need a caucus, Michelle, to tell you what just about everyone else already knew??

Posted by: Christine | January 4, 2012, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Even before she dropped out, there is not one person in the mix (both parties) I feel are what our country needs.

Posted by: ocmarsha | January 4, 2012, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

To all you idiots who are calling her unqualified to run the country, who is she unqualified compared to, OBAMA? Give me a break. She has 2x the credentials he did prior to getting elected. She is the most Conservative candidate in the race, never changed her message or intentions, does not lie, does not have skeletons in her closet. To anyone with a moral base and an understanding of what the Establishment is doing to this country, that makes her the MOST qualified for this office. Thats the problem, the Establishment pushed her out and fooled all the useful idiots into believing she is unqualified in the same manner they fooled you into thinking Obama and his policies are qualified and/or good for this country.

Posted by: noname | January 4, 2012, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

Bachmann said God spoke to her and told her to run for the presidency. Was God wrong or just playing a joke on her?

Posted by: Sky | January 4, 2012, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

“I wonder if the Men in Black will deport her back to her home planet now that she’s unemployed.”

She’s not unemployed you halfwit. She’s the Congresswoman for Minnesota’s 6th district.

Dang, these Obamabots are hopeless. No wonder they voted for that fraud in 2008 and are willing to vote for him again, even after three years of his miserable, failed policies.

Posted by: Calypso | January 4, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Well, I absolutely disagreed with her positions, thinks that she is a loon, and very happy that she has been put out to pasture but I wish her well. America seeing another woman running for the highest office in our country so soon after a formidable run by Hillary Clinton only moves women closer to one day being elected to it.

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 4, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Well, it looks like the fringies have reduced the field from Snow White and the 7 Dwarves to Tweedle-Dee, Tweedle-Dumb, and Tweedle-Dumber. Any of these losers will be fodder for Obama, unless of course the TeaPublicans pull a Bush and fix the election like they did in 2000. I wouldn’t put it past them to try that again, what-the-heck, it got one incompetent elected, it might work again.

Posted by: Curt | January 4, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Just as well. Now is not the time for a woman President. I agree with Christine as well. There really isn’t anyone at the moment who is even remotely good for the country.

Posted by: dashdot | January 4, 2012, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Good. another useless neocon steps aside. RP 2012.

Posted by: Chris | January 4, 2012, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

The woman needed a big history lesson. She was pretty clueless. And then she repeated the lie about the cost of Obama’s India trip. She just says stuff to make her repubs angry, (who dont bother to check her statements). I didn’t trust her as far as I could throw her.
she makes me shudder. And as a woman, I was embarrassed to be represented by her.

Posted by: joan | January 4, 2012, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Thanks for running MIchelle! I, for one, am glad to still have Bachmann in Congress to stick it to the Dems. Next, I am very glad to see Rick Santorum in a statistical dead heat with the Republican Establishment candidate Romney. Rick, if he stays true to his strong conservative positions, is a strong contender and could follow Reagan’s trajectory. Romney is doomed to be yet another in a long line of moderates who are primped and prepped to be uninspiring milqtoast candidates destined flame out in mid-October like Ford, Bush(41), Dole, and McCain.

Posted by: Snitch-in-Time | January 4, 2012, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

She is just soooooo hot!

Posted by: Felipe | January 4, 2012, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“…And as a woman, I was embarrassed to be represented by her.”

Which leads me to ask a question: Did Michele Bachmann’s candidacy help or hurt future women who might run for President?

Isn’t it interesting that women around the world are holding major, major, powerful positions except here in the United States? Okay… Secretary of State and Speaker of the House…

Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | January 4, 2012, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

The results are a bit skewed . Because independents are allowed to vote, which was 1/4 of the votes. That is why Ron Paul did so well.

Posted by: Jeff | January 4, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Michele Bachman made the same mistake all the other candidates are making. Quit playing Romney’s game. Make him take a stance. Don’t settle for his 30 second sound bites and presidential name calling. You have to convince the fat cats in the Republican Party he’s unelectable.

Go after his 59 nine point plan that further shrinks the middle class and gives all the power in this country to the corporations. Slam him on the huge salary and big bonuses he got as CEO of Bain Capital. Quit being so gentle on him. I don’t like Newt, but he is right, Romney is a liar, don’t let Romney’s PACs set the agenda.

If the republican candidates can’t compete with Mitt, the President and the DNC can. If the other candidates don’t have the guts do this, they might as well follow Bachman and go home.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Hope GOP drops out of the race for some more CHANGE .

Posted by: Media | January 4, 2012, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

When God told Michele to “RUN” he was talking about Marcus.

Posted by: mjb | January 4, 2012, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

I, for one, am sad to see her go. She was the most qualified to run the Country out of all the canidates. Unlike the RINOs being pushed by the GOP, she was the only canidate that had the conviction to turn this Country around. It will be sad to see the United States crush and burn. RIP USA.

Posted by: Tom | January 4, 2012, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Seriously if you supported her you need to get your head examined.

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2012, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Hope Michelles on top when she and Marcus get frisky. Marcus needs to stop eating the donuts.

Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | January 4, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

She got 5% human grace and a 95% DIVINE BOOT!!

bachman should be ashamed of herself, barking that the Persident is a one tearm Persident here she cant even have a decient rating.

Posted by: clifford | January 4, 2012, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

A good Congressman, but the field needs to be winnowed. Let’s get this down to one so we can gear up to defeat Obama…Biggest Disaster Ever.

Posted by: Dean | January 4, 2012, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Charles posted: “Rather glaring omission that her campaign chief, Kent Sorenson,
quit her campaign last week and endorsed Ron Paul.”

And if you look at the polling numbers, Cong. Paul went from first place down to third place following Mr. Sorenson’s brilliant advice. Perhaps we can get Kent to sign on
to President Obama’s staff and help them in a similar manner.

Posted by: anon | January 4, 2012, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

She’s still the prettiest one of the bunch, from either party. (Oh, excuse me…Was she saying something?)

Posted by: Mark Carlton | January 4, 2012, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Michele Bachmann > Obama. By several galaxies and an ocean at least.

Posted by: Obvious | January 4, 2012, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Nothing has changed at all: Obama still sucks. LOL.

Posted by: Sai | January 4, 2012, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“Michele Bachmann > Obama. By several galaxies and an ocean at least.”

Well put. She is infinitely better than the fraud we have now.

Of course, it really doesn’t take much to be infinitely better than he.

Posted by: Calypso | January 4, 2012, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

None of this too much affects me. As an older gay man who recieves government assistance, i will be voting for Obama no matter what.

Posted by: SameAgainSearambler | January 4, 2012, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I am a Tea Party member and respect Michele. But once she twisted Herman Cains 999 plan in a public forum without blinking I let go of any chance of me sticking my neck uot for her. ‘You know, if you take Herman Cains 999 program and flip it upside down it’s 666!’ Wow,Really?

Posted by: Fidlin1 | January 4, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

What happens to the war chest when they drop out?

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Too bad. Another good candidate destroyed by the media. Bachmann joins Palin and others who have a lot to offer the country but represent a great threat to the liberal lock on women’s votes. Conservative women, just like conservative blacks and hispanics, will continue to be attacked relentlessly.

Posted by: BubblerDad | January 4, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Maybe OWS should adopt the tag line “We are the 53 percent”

The 53 percent that pay no income taxes – and more than that, get net revenue from the 47 percent that do pay in.

It is a good idea to have everyone pay, if only a dollar. The sense of entitlement – it’s just a human trait, if you don’t fight against it, it takes over – every single time. I include myself in that list, if not for circumstances, I might be collecting money from other people and harping at the 47 percent that do pay income taxes for not doing enough.

Posted by: RoboBobo | January 4, 2012, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

GOD told her to get back into the kitchen and stop flapping her lips in a Man’s world…

Posted by: Jimbo | January 4, 2012, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

__”Ron Paul will probably stay till the bitter end.”
POSTED BY: EMERALD_SPARKS ____________What out for a third party candidate. That’s when it will get interesting.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. God, what an idiot.

Posted by: mitch Eisenman | January 4, 2012, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Fact: A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obamaster.

Ron Paul is the only candidate Obama wants to run against.

Posted by: dooky | January 4, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

One can only go so far on crazy.

Posted by: Jenn | January 4, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

I’d rather have Harry Reid go as the Senate majority leader than kick Obama out of the White House. Think about it.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Michele had the guts to call out Newt, Cain and Perry and the brains to know when to step aside.
She should be awarded a Cabinet Position in the next Administration.

Posted by: gutsygirl | January 4, 2012, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Her husband can finally drop all the false pretenses and come out of the closet.

Posted by: dan | January 4, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Guys about Ron Paul – he did FANTASTIC.

He doubled his performance from 2008. We were told the upper limit for him was 10 percent, then 15 percent, then 20 percent – he broke every limit.

He has his ticked out of Iowa, and is running in 2nd place in New Hampshire – and he’s ready to compete nationwide.

The drumbeat of ‘too bad he lost’ is coming from people who know full well he didn’t lose – it’s just that the average joe schmuck thinks he’s a petty manipulator, and gets on these forums saying the opposite of what he believes.

Whatever Ron Paul marches on.

Posted by: Rocko | January 4, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Sometimes you feel like a nut , sometimes you don’t . Don’t worry Americans , the RNC has more whopper telling nuts left in their bag than a peanut vendor @ Coney Island. Lucky us…

Posted by: davem | January 4, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

___”Michele was the ONLY CANDIDATE that dared to call out the FACT that Barack Hussein has two Kenyan Illegal Alien Family Members living in the US, 100% on the US Taxpayers dime. Which remaining candidate will dare to take this point of argument to the remaining GOP debates, as well as to the debate when poised against Barack Hussein???

POSTED BY: JANE SMITHFIELD | JANUARY 4, 2012, 12:29 PM 12:29 PM____________Cheap shot. Missing your milk and cookies?

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

“GOD told her to get back into the kitchen and stop flapping her lips in a Man’s world…

@Jimbo: Who’s the lady lucky enough to have you coming home to her at night?

Posted by: gutsygirl | January 4, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Get used to it republicans, you’re stuck with Mitt. As soon as this dog and pony show is over, Mitt will have to enter the big leagues where 30 second sound bites and name calling don’t work. He’ll have to take a stance and defend his 59 point shrink the middle class and give everything to the truffle eaters plan.

Then let him try to tell blue collar workers he’s one of them while he benefits from the huge salary and big bonuses he got from Bain Capital. The republicans coddle him because the fat cats think he can defeat President Obama.

Romney will go the way he did last time when John McCain kicked his butt by pinning him down and making him tell the truth.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I heard CNN’s Soledad O’Brian and company try to snag Ron Paul this morning about a tweet sent by a troll to Huntsman. Paul obviously didn’t do it, but that didn’t stop CNN from trying to pin it on him as the rest of the media talking heads chimed in about that newsletter crap. Are these people really that stupid or is there really a media agenda going on here?

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The Pew Center reported in April 2011 the cause of a $12.7 trillion shift in the debt situation, from a 2001 CBO forecast of a cumulative $2.3 trillion surplus by 2011 versus the estimated $10.4 trillion public debt we actually face in 2011. The major drivers were:

Revenue declines due to the recession, separate from the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003: 28%
Defense spending increases: 15%
Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003: 13%
Increases in net interest: 11%
Other non-defense spending: 10%
Other tax cuts: 8%
Obama Stimulus: 6%
Medicare Part D: 2%
Other reasons: 7%[33]

Posted by: rta | January 4, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

None of this too much affects me. As an older gay man who receives government assistance, i will be voting for Obama no matter what.
Posted by: SameAgainSearambler | January 4, 2012, 1:30 pm

Interesting. Why mention your sexual orientation? How is that relevant to the discussion about Bachmann quitting the race? Never mind, I already know the answer. Look, if you want to be a troll, then by all means, be a troll. Embrace your trollishness. Relish it. Wallow in it. You appear to spend a lot of time trolling here. Posting under other peoples names and such. And ABC is fine with that. But seriously, being a homophobic troll is no way to go through life, son (to paraphrase a line from that guy in Animal House).

Posted by: Michelle | January 4, 2012, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

MICHELLE

Who ever made that post is not SEARAMBLER

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

So sick of men and women who have such overwhelming disrespect for intelligent principled women. If women (of all races) had any level of self-respect, we might see the kind of support Obama has from blacks. Not that I agree with the attitude of voting for someone ONLY because they are in your “group” – but the disdain and idiocy of women who attacked Sarah Palin – by quoting Tina Fey is an example of this crap

Posted by: Justice | January 4, 2012, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Do they keep the money?

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

She can be far more effective fighting the traitor in the White House by continuing her work in the House.

Posted by: Liberty Belle | January 4, 2012, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

If Perry and Bachman were out of the race last night, Santorum or Ron Paul would have beaten Romney by 10 percentage points.

Now I suspect Romney has made an overnight deal with Perry to stay in the race and take votes away from the other two in exchange for a VP slot. We’ll see if Perry goes after Romney or continues to set up his 30 second sound bites.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Bachmann was as qualified to be President as Obama.

Posted by: Son of A Gip | January 4, 2012, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Bachmann was by far the worst choice and the entire GOP lineup is reminiscent of one big obnoxious circus that people have stopped buying tickets to. Those of you who cling so desperately to the right should know that this woman would only have stuck women back in the kitchen to be submissive to their husbands. I know abortion is a touchy subject but she would have also outlawed the right from rape victims or women who suffer fatal pregnancy complications. This is coming from a hardworking moderate, the only GOP that stands a chance against Obama is Ron Paul. With newer generations coming out as outspoken liberals and the occupy movement getting them riled up about politics, more of them are registered to vote now.

So to all the ladies and gentlemen to the right, good freaking luck. They all suck and you know it. Find me any politician who is honest and about the American people and I will start believing in unicorns.
(I’m a tax paying business owner who’s probably voting for Obama. See you at the booth)

Posted by: PayYourTaxes | January 4, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I heard CNN’s Soledad O’Brian and company try to snag Ron Paul this morning about a tweet sent by a troll to Huntsman. Paul obviously didn’t do it…
Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 1:54 pm

How do you know Paul did not do it? What makes it obvious? What was in the tweet?

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I’m really saddened that you gave up so easily. I was looking forward to supporting you or Sarah Palin. We need a change and I felt you would have been it!!

Posted by: Ina | January 4, 2012, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Well now at least she can go back to helping O.J. Simpson find the real killer.

Posted by: Billy Jim Bob | January 4, 2012, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

So sick of men and women who have such overwhelming disrespect for intelligent principled women. Posted by: Justice | January 4, 2012, 2:07 pm.

I do not see either intelligence or principles from this woman. This is a woman who said publicly, into a microphone, that women should submit to their husband. She claimed this was the reason she went to law school to learn tax law, because her husband told her to.

Do you feel the same way about an intelligent principled man? Like the President? Are you sick of the overwhelming disrespect his detractors show for him? Or is your moral outrage reserved for women only?

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Cynic (2:21 PM); Because Ron Paul said he wasn’t even aware of what she was refering to and the tweet was a smart assed comment about a single voter in a remote county in Iowa. #1 Ron Paul doesn’t have time for such non-sense. #2 He probably doesn’t know what a tweet is or how to send one. and #3 There is nothing to be gained by making fun of some voter in a remote corner of Iowa. #4 I’m a pretty good judge of when someone is telling a lie and he sounded like he was totally in the dark about what she was even getting at. I for one believed there was nothing there.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

I’d much prefer the Democrats lose a majority in the Senate than Obama lose the White House. Harry Reid is unprincipled and has to go.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Tmferretti (2:12 PM); Very astute. You may be onto something there. Isn’t it interesting how politicians eat their own? I’ll be watching to see if Perry continues.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

II suspect that Perry cut a deal with Romney last night to keep Perry in the race to take votes away from Santorum, and Ron Paul in exchange for the VP slot. We’ll know for sure if Perry just slams Santorum and Paul in South Carolina. If he does, there’s no doubt Perry is small change in Mitts pocket.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

“…And as a woman, I was embarrassed to be represented by her.”
Which leads me to ask a question: Did Michele Bachmann’s candidacy help or hurt future women who might run for President?

POSTED BY: MYTAKEONTHIS61 | JANUARY 4, 2012, 1:01 PM 1:01 PM________Probably hurt because Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin have created this false impression and stereotypical image that women aren’t smart to vie for the presidency. The truth is that there are powerful and intelligent women all across America who can give these male candidates a run for their money

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Well this is sad, but maybe now you can return to your loving home and make your husband a couple of cheeseburgers. What the hell, make him six. And supersize them.

Posted by: bill boy jim joe | January 4, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

__”Even before she dropped out, there is not one person in the mix (both parties) I feel are what our country needs.”

POSTED BY: OCMARSHA | JANUARY 4, 2012, 12:32 PM 12:32 PM__________The truth is that it will take a decade of sound, consistent economic policy to restore this country from the eight years of the Bush presidency. People are looking for quick answers; Obama does not have those for only four years of being president. It could have been better, but the GOP vowed to obstruct the president at every turn. They wanted him to fail. It is only hypocritical that they are blaming Obama for what is “wrong” without realizing that they are a part of what is wrong with America.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

It would be nice if ABC would take the time to point out the gaffes, missteps, broken promises and outright lies of Mr. Obama.
Posted by: CJ | January 4, 2012, 11:32 am.—-> HE IS PRESIDENT OBAMA TO YOU

Posted by: Kathleen | January 4, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

This woman is an idiot and is not qualified for dog catcher. Whenever she talks about taxes she gets it 100% wrong – and she is a tax attorney!!!!. [I am in accounting]. She would force women to live as if it were 1912, not 2012 [no rights at all, beholden to hubby for all things]. She does not understand foreign policy and would have us at war with Iran her first day if elected President. She would ruin the country on “principle” because she is an economic fool. Amazes me that the Republicans think Bachmann and Palin are qualified women -the Democrats have Hilary Clinton for comparison – and it is NO comparison. Good riddance!

Posted by: pksk531 | January 4, 2012, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“GOD told her to get back into the kitchen and stop flapping her lips in a Man’s world…”

POSTED BY: JIMBO___________LOL! It’s true: The bible says that women are to be submissive. Being a Christian and a god fearing woman, I’m sure Michelle Bachmann knows that.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

It would be nice if ABC would take the time to point out the gaffes, missteps, broken promises and outright lies of Mr. Obama.
Posted by: CJ | January 4, 2012, 11:32 am.

AS MUCH AS YOU DON’T LIKE IT… GUESS WHAT!? HE IS PRESIDENT OBAMA-NOT MR. OBAMA! HE WILL AND ALWAYS BE PRESIDENT OBAMA SO GET WITH THE PROGRAM! IGNORANT IMBECILES!!! I DID NOT LIKE ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING PRESIDENT BUSH DID IN OFFICE BUT GUESS WHAT HE IS PRESIDENT BUSH ALTHOUGH HE WAS NEVER THERE LONG ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY FULFILL THE JOBLY DUTIES!!!!! SO LIKE I SAID GET OVER IT!!!! OH YEAH, AND HE WILL STILL BE PRESIDENT OBAMA IN 2012!!!

Posted by: Kathleen | January 4, 2012, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

An amoeba has better intelligence. The only thing she had going for her were her looks, nothing else.

Posted by: Radford Bean | January 4, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

MAYBE BACHMANN CAN GO A FINED JOHN WAYNE IN IOWA,,,WHAT A JOKE!

Posted by: rta | January 4, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

The lesson here is that voters hate a liar. We love to be lied to, but we hate liars. Tell us about how you’re going to make us rich, etc, but don’t make wild claims about yourself.

Bachman is unstable. Good riddance.

Posted by: Eric | January 4, 2012, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Bam! That’s the sound of reality hitting Ms Bachmann. She can now go on to be Fox News brightest new star. Move over Sarah another box of rocks is heading your way.

Posted by: tim c | January 4, 2012, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Kathleen — agreed. Ever notice how pretty much everyone on FOX uses the “Mr. Obama” and quite of quite a few people on CNN do the same. When is the last time you heard anyone say Mr. Reagan?

Posted by: dan | January 4, 2012, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

I don’t think Romney offered the same deal to Michele Bachman as he did to Rick Perry, stay in the race, and take conservative votes away from a single candidate in South Carolina and Florida. First of all if he offered her a VP slot, he’d be committing political suicide, anything else and she who not be able to keep her mouth shut and blow the whole deal.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Tmferretti; Do you work for the DNC? You seem to be quite versed in political dirty and underhanded Chicago styled politics.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Don’t you just love it? There are so many Obama haters, no matter who the topic is on, they will always jump in and say something negative about Obama…god they hate him so much…it must really really bug them that he got elected lol…they cannot stay on topic without mentioning his name…how sad Obama has controlled their lives so much they cannot even stay on topic in a post…

Posted by: RalphF | January 4, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

NEWCOUNTRYMAN

No I don’t work for the DNC but I’ve always been taught to look for motives. Perry spent a bunch in Iowa, and got only 10% of the vote. If anybody had a reason to drop out it was him.

Now all of a sudden he’s back in the race, what’s his motive? The only thing that would make sense is if Romney offered him something to stay. We’ll see in Saturday’s debate, who Perry goes after, if it’s Romney, I’m wrong. If it’s Santorum Gingrich or Newt I hit the nail it right on the head.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 4, 2012, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Now maybe she will go back and actually earn her government paycheck she has been stealing for the last year, and take Ron Paul with her. They rode on the backs of freedom lovers and lower taxes
and less government, all the while subsidizing their campaigns with federal treasure-that was intended to be used to pay someone for working.

Posted by: Scott Jay | January 4, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

For her fifteen minutes of fame, Michelle Bachmann has earned a new title for herself. From now on, she will be known as the “former presidential candidate.” So, she hasn’t really lost anything.

Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 4, 2012, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

It’s looking more and more like. . . . OBAMA 2012!!!!!!!!

Posted by: MsT-Mac | January 4, 2012, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Its pretty bad when the state that you were born and raised in wont endorse you, but the people of Iowa spoke, obviously they were getting really sick of her nonsense and lack of intelligence. Maybe Michele and Sara could start their own bus tour, they could call it the “yes, were idiots but we gladly accept your money tour”.

The only good thing is that if she did receive the republican nominee, Obama would have won a enormous landslide victory, OBAMA 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: michael | January 4, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Well, spent my time leaving a comment this morning, but apparently ABC doesn’t like what I said. Not included in the comments. How very Marxist of you.

Posted by: nana | January 4, 2012, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Only 1 candidate can win independents, conservative democrats, moderates, and all republicans:nRon Paul.

No one else can make that claim.

If people think Ron Paul is ‘nutty’ and all he does is hold firmly to the constitution, then those people very simply do not support our constitution, THE DEFINING DOCUMENT that made us an excellent nation among the rest. If people can’t support that – why are they still here?

Check out europe or Asia if you want “collective” which is reapply just “top-down” government. Go check it out – it DOESN’T WORK. I have cousins in Ireland, a brother in Spain, in-laws in Italy – and it’s always the same story: governments can’t run lives! All that results is a mixture of Corruption and Ineptitude.

You guys really want to support the continued expansion of ou military presence and threat around the world? That is NOT what our country is about. We are supposed to be the leaders of the FREE world, not the “secure” world.

You don’t give up freedoms for security.

Thomas Jefferson said he would rather suffer the inconveniences of too much freedom than too little.

Only 1 candidate will give us MORE FREEDOM.

Let’s go Ron!
We won Equal delegates in Iowa.
New Hampshire: YOU’RE UP!!

Posted by: Thomas_Adams | January 4, 2012, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Good, one less crazy person to worry about. People came to this country for freedom of religion, to escape persecution because of their beliefs, to be able to live in peace in a country ran by the people. All of the GOP candidates right now sound like the English rulers we fled. “MY BELIEF IS THE ONLY BELIEF. YOU MUST BE MY RELIGION OR YOU ARE WRONG! WE WILL RULE THE COUNTRY WITH RELIGION!” Come on people! Separation of church and state please and thank you. These religious whack jobs are not the answer. All they are going to do is strip our rights and ability to make choices for ourselves. Our founding fathers would be ashamed and are probably rolling in their graves right now. Too bad the sane candidate has no chance, Huntsman. AT LEAST HE ACCEPTS EVOLUTION!

Posted by: angry9999999 | January 5, 2012, 12:40 am 12:40 am

I was so looking forward to Marcus being first lady. He would have looked beautiful in his inaugural gown and beaded clutch.

Posted by: PhillipP | January 5, 2012, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Let’s start with Michele Bachman needing a grip on sanity to run, and failing that.
As for all you attackers of Obamas results, try pulling off the obstructionist GOP and actually ALLOWING bills to be debated and voted upon, and see if results do not improve.
And the “issue”" of Obama having two distant relatives living in America without proper visas, WOW, THAT is FAR more important than jobs, budget and defense by all means. OR, we can allow the proper agencies to do their jobs and trust they will DEFEND America successfully from this evil threat.
The level of vitriol from the right is so high, it’s amazing there aren’t massive heart attack epidemics.

Posted by: bobcat | January 5, 2012, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

It is too bad that Michelle has left the race. Iowa is only one state and she may have picked up some steam as others trip themselves up. Good job, Michelle. You did well and thank you!

Posted by: Carl | January 5, 2012, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

With her ongoing mental problems she never had a chance. Who in their right mind would want a mentally unbalanced person in the white house. At least now she may go away permanently.

Posted by: Daniel E Doherty | January 22, 2012, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.