By Gary Langer

Jan 16, 2012 5:00pm

Congress Hits a New Low in Approval; Obama Opens Election Year Under 50%

Hammered by bipartisan discontent with its partisan rancor, the U.S. Congress reconvenes Tuesday with its lowest approval rating on record in polls dating back nearly 40 years – ideal fodder not just for late-night comedians, but also for President Obama in the election year ahead.

Just 13 percent of Americans in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll approve of the way Congress is handling its job, while 84 percent disapprove – its worst rating in poll results since 1974. Sixty-five percent disapprove “strongly,” a vast level of high-intensity criticism.

Congress’ rating is a broad 35 points below Obama’s 48 percent approval, the biggest gap between approval of the president and Congress since 1990. Obama, though, still has plenty of challenges of his own: In polling since 1940, just four previous presidents have started their re-election year with less than 50 percent approval. Only one of them won, Richard Nixon in 1972. 

Nonetheless, the squabbling that’s riven Congress the past year gives Obama one clear strategy – joining in the chorus of criticism of Congress, and the Republicans in Congress in particular. Their 21 percent approval rating is a point from its record low, set just last month.

The Democrats in Congress, at 33 percent approval, do better than their GOP counterparts, and have gained 6 points from their low last month. But they’ve moved in tandem with the Republicans: Both parties in Congress have lost 17 points in approval in the past three years.

Given the partisan and ideological nature of Congress’ wrangling, it’s striking how disapproval of the institution crosses the country’s political landscape. This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds that disapproval is equally high – 84 to 86 percent – among Democrats, Republicans and independents, and conservatives, moderates and liberals alike.

Indeed it peaks at both ends of the spectrum: Ninety-one percent of conservative Republicans disapprove of Congress, as do 90 percent of liberal Democrats – one thing, at least, on which they agree.

AND OBAMA – Unlike Congress, there are sharp partisan differences in Obama’s approval rating – from a high of 90 percent among liberal Democrats to a low of 7 percent among conservative Republicans. While he does well with racial minorities, just 40 percent of whites approve of his work in office, as do just 43 percent of political independents, the key swing voters in national politics. Both, though, are up from their lows, 34 percent in both groups in October.

Obama’s 48 percent approval is up from his career-low 42 percent in October, albeit essentially flat from last month’s 49 percent. As noted, in data since 1940, four other presidents have gone into their re-election year with approval ratings under 50 percent – Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush.

vs. CONGRESS – Comparisons of the president and Congress contain an element of unfairness, since even in tough times a president usually retains core supporters within his own party, a base unavailable to a sausage-making Congress. It’s notable, nonetheless, that ratings of Congress have remained flat on the floor since fall, even as Obama’s gained 6 points. 

Moreover, as noted, the 35-point difference between approval of the president and of Congress is its highest since 1990. And the ratio between the two is its highest on record: On average the past 38 years, there’ve been 1.5 approvers of the president for every approver of Congress. Today that’s peaked at 3.7 – a comparative advantage that Obama is likely to stress regularly between now and Nov. 6.

BACK STORY – Congress fell off the approval cliff last summer amid the budget squabbling that led the country to near-default; it went from a dismal-enough 28 percent approval a year ago to half that in October. Disapproval has gained 18 points in the past year, “strong” disapproval, 22 points.

Congress rarely is popular in and of itself; its approval rating has averaged 38 percent in nearly 120 polls by ABC and the Post since 1988, and Gallup previously dating to 1974. In general it’s harder to like an institution than an individual, and the political divisions within Congress mean there’s always something there for someone to dislike.

Still, Congress has achieved popularity, peaking at 59 percent approval in December 2001, part of the post-9/11 rally, but also in the mid-50s in 1998, 1989, 1987 and 1985. It can be popular, though it rarely is.

Nor is Congress necessarily more unpopular when control of the House and Senate is divided, as now.  Again since 1974, its approval rating when divided has been 42 percent, the same as when it’s been under Republican control, albeit better than its 33 percent when the Democrats have run the shop.

Looking ahead, the economy is the clear issue for the president: His approval rating is 80 percent among people who say they’ve gotten better off financially under his presidency, vs. 18 percent among those who’ve become worse off. For Congress, though, economic advances offer little hope: Its ratings are dismal, 9 and 17 percent respectively, among the worse-off and the better-off alike.

METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Jan. 12-15, 2012, among a random national sample of 1,000 adults, including landline and cell-phone-only respondents. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points for the full sample. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by Abt-SRBI of New York, N.Y.

User Comments

Barack Obama will lose the presidential election on November 6, 2012. During his tenure in the Oval Office, the Dow Jones seriously lowered, unemployment soared, the national debt is well-over $15 trillion, and gasoline prices sky rocket. The American Electorate should vote-out another Reagan clone.

Posted by: dustin95sc | January 16, 2012, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

February 20th is Predident’s Day. On that day when President Obama steps out of the White House, if he sees his shadow, we’ll have one more year of high unemployment.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 16, 2012, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Lying Liars, What happened to the stocks on Obama’s inauguration day? Let me see… U.S. stocks sank, sending the Dow Jones Industrial Average to its worst Inauguration Day decline, as speculation banks must raise more capital sent financial shares to an almost 14-year low. State Street Corp., the largest money manager for institutions, tumbled 59 percent after unrealized bond losses almost doubled. Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America Corp. slumped more than 23 percent on an analyst’s prediction that they’ll need to take steps to shore up their balance sheets. The Dow’s 4 percent slide was the most on an Inauguration Day in the measure’s 112-year history, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and the Stock Trader’s Almanac. The S&P 500 plunged 5.3 percent to 805.22. The S&P 500 Financials Index fell 17 percent to below its lowest closing level since March 1995 as concern European banks need more capital also weighed on the group. The Dow average slid 332.13 points to 7,949.09. Both the Dow and S&P 500 retreated to two- month lows. The whole financial market cringed when Obama seized power. Maybe you should check that, eh?

Posted by: TexBork2011 | January 16, 2012, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Tex — And just how much of that was already poised to occur before Obama was sworn in? What happened on election day, when Obama actually got elected in a landslide? And now, three years later, where are all of those numbers? Way up, correct? We all know Wall Street has the guts of a scared little girl, going up or down if someone says ‘boo’ too loud. Bottom line is, Wall Street has done very very well since it bottomed out under GW and since Obama has been in office.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 16, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Just like his lying unemployment with real unemployment being 14% these poll numbers are also inflated his real approval rating is 35%.

Posted by: PAT | January 16, 2012, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

PAT:”these poll numbers are also inflated his real approval rating is 35%.”

Actually, these polls have a margin of error of 3 percentage points, as a rule. So his approval rating could be 45% OR 51% (why this headline is so idiotic).

But not 35%.

In fact, it COULD be higher than 51%; they’ve never polled ME, and I am an Independent who strongly approves.

Posted by: RAVEN | January 16, 2012, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Given the mess Obama inherited, the Republicans have a golden opportunity to seize power. They are going to blow it. Obama will clean Mitt’s clock. Plastic Mitt? Flip flop Mitt? Corporations are people Mitt? Health care Mitt? Give me a break. Mitt’s a phony. He’s like a bad actor playing the part of a candidate. He has no substance.

Posted by: Plantain_11 | January 16, 2012, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Hey Dustin95sc, you forgot to mention a few things.

like the almost 2 straight years of private sector job growth to date and the 3 million PS jobs created so far.

And the apprehension of bin Laden and 40 or so other terrorist masterminds.

And the removal of Gadaffi (who has been a thorn in our side since Nixon) and Mubarrak (another dictator).

And the END of the endless Iraq war.

AND the repayment of ALL the TARP money, plus interest.

You’re welcome.

Posted by: RAVEN | January 16, 2012, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

This is actually funny, and mister holder, please check out that the republicans are the MINORITY, so all the problems, but November 2012, this will change, get out and vote people, we can and will make a difference, this is our country, owned by we-the-people, we can if we join together and fight can take it back, put God back in Government and schools and demand every elected official to follow the constitution to the letter, no changes and no surpreme court rule making to fit their will

Posted by: Will | January 16, 2012, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

“November 2012, this will change, get out and vote people, we can and will make a difference, this is our country, owned by we-the-people, we can if we join together and fight can take it back, put God back in Government and schools and demand every elected official to follow the constitution to the letter, no changes and no surpreme court rule making to fit their will”

Um, Will?

The people DID “join together” and “get out and vote” and they elected OBAMA by a landslide with the largest voter turn-out since 1910.

And anyone who “follows the Constitution to the letter” would NEVER try to “put God (back..sic, meaning that is an ERROR, as the Constitution expressly FORBIDS any association between church and state) in government”.

I know; those aren’t the letters you folk like and want to ignore or change with ammendments which reflect your religious beliefs.

(rolling my eyes)

Posted by: RAVEN | January 16, 2012, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

DUSTIN95SC | January 16, 2012, 5:10 PM, SAID:

“During his (Obama’s) tenure in the Oval Office, the Dow Jones seriously lowered…”
======================================
LOL! ……….”95″ must be your birth year, and you apparently don’t own any stocks.

DJ Index (Jan 20th, 2001; the day Bush took office) = 10,660
DJ Index (Jan 20th, 2009; the day Bush left office) = 8,077
DROP in the Dow under G.W. Bush = – 2,583 = a decrease in DJ stock values of 24%.

DJ Index (Jan 20th, 2009; the day Obama took office) = 8,077
DJ Index (Today) = 12,442
INCREASE in the Dow under President Obama = + 4,365 = an INCREASE in DJ stock values of +54%.

’nuff said… LOL!

Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | January 16, 2012, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

obama must be allowed to finish the work he began. the country cannot afford mitt “i like firing people “romney or another term of a GOP (god’s own party) congress

Posted by: jim lunde | January 17, 2012, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

The Congress was dysfunctional when President Obama took office. The republicans used every rule (filibuster, etc) to delay and obstruct legislation. It became totally grid locked with the election of the House tea party republicans.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 18, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am

JIM LUNDE | JANUARY 17, 2012, 10:33 P……”obama must be allowed to finish the work he began”……..”To fundamentally transform” America into a nanny state? Are you aware of what is happening in Greece? People there became dependent on the govt; but the govt has run out of money! So, now they want the hard working, productive Germans (and the rest of the EU) to bail them out …. along with Italy, Ireland, Spain and Portugal.

Posted by: deanbob | January 18, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Hello everyone,

Get it together, all of you. Clinton deregulated the markets to the nth degree; Bush joined in and then tanked the whole thing with war and tax cuts–NOT MONOR EXPENSES MIND YOU. Obama walks into a hurricane and begins sandbagging. The ideal response? Nothing ever will be, we know it. A good enough response? An “avoid the hidden budget deficiencies a la Greece and Spain” response, where no accountability is required? A nanny state is where businesses are nationalized and tax rates leap toward the 50% mark. We have one of the lowest tax burdens of the industrialized world, a VERY robust private sector (which looks more like an oligopoly by the day) and an economy which every major economist agrees has weathered the storm while Europe capsizes. Loud opinions do not matter if we do not understand the criteria by which a government is measured. Unemployment down, by any unit of measure; war costs reduced by withdrawals; and increased standing in allied and neutral nations from the Bush days. All equal an end to the bloodletting, with clear indications (already) that the upswing is already in motion. Talking point blowhards can do some political and economic homework then get back to me. I’ve worked in politics for too long to believe any spin-worthy sound bites that can be thrown, so come off it…

Posted by: I have Left The Cave | January 26, 2012, 12:16 am 12:16 am

You guys are all fools. Stop complaining about Obama, the 99%, the 1%, the invisible hand, your miserable jobs, the EU and how much the government or Wall St. is ruining your lives. There are people who are really starving out there, and you all are here, on this forum or whatever, eating CRAP. Why don’t you all put down the Vasaline and go manage your country and screw everyone else? The real problem is the people we have become… a bunch of fat, uncultured, lazy, arrogant, ignorant Americans. Let’s not give the rest of the world the benefit of being correct.
“Ask not what your country can do for you, but what YOU can do for YOUR country.” –Screw everyone else. Good luck, America.

Posted by: Juan Echeverry | January 31, 2012, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.