Gingrich Consulting Draws Skepticism; Romney’s Background, a Divided View

By Gary Langer

Jan 31, 2012 7:00am
ap mitt romney newt gingrich ll 120130 wblog Gingrich Consulting Draws Skepticism; Romneys Background, a Divided View

Paul Sancya/AP Photo

Neither Mitt Romney’s nor Newt Gingrich’s private sector experience is playing particularly well with the American public, although Gingrich’s consulting work draws far more criticism than Romney’s background buying and restructuring companies.

Americans by a broad 54-24 percent in this ABC News/Washington Post poll hold an unfavorable opinion of Gingrich’s work as a consultant for companies with an interest in federal policymaking after he left elective office. The division on Romney, while not positive, is much closer: Forty percent see his work experience negatively, vs. 35 percent positively.

Both do far better in their own party, especially Romney. Fifty-eight percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents express a favorable view of his business experience. Many fewer leaned Republicans, 44 percent, rate Gingrich’s experience positively; indeed nearly as many see Gingrich’s consulting work unfavorably, 40 percent, as favorably.

Nonetheless that’s a substantial improvement for Gingrich. This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds that positive reactions to his work experience among leaned Republicans have improved by 15 points since mid-January, while negative ratings have dropped by 11 points, from 51 percent. So while he still trails Romney in work-experience ratings, the margin has narrowed.

Across the political spectrum, these views are far more dim. Sixty-six percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents have an unfavorable opinion of Gingrich’s consulting work. And while Romney’s business experience is less unpopular, still more than half of leaned Democrats, 53 percent, see it negatively, vs. 22 percent favorably. A substantial 25 percent are undecided.

The two have been going after each other hammer and tong on the subject in Florida, which holds its GOP primary today, with Gingrich accusing Romney of having invested in banks that foreclosed on homes in the state, and Romney criticizing Gingrich’s consulting work for mortgage giant Freddie Mac.

There are ideological as well as partisan differences in public views. Self-described “very” conservative Americans divide on Gingrich’s consulting work, 44 percent favorable, 40 percent unfavorable — a weak score given Gingrich’s efforts to appeal to this group. Among “somewhat” conservatives, 54 percent see his work negatively, about the same as it is among moderates.

Negative views of Romney’s work background are 11 points lower than Gingrich’s among very conservatives, and a broad 20 points lower among somewhat conservatives.

Intensity of opinion is another difference. There’s a slight negative tilt in “strongly” unfavorable vs. strongly favorable views of Romney’s experience restructuring companies, 19 percent vs. 12 percent. For Gingrich it’s a much wider margin, with views strongly negative by 24 points, 31 percent to 7 percent. Part of the reason is a particularly strong negative reaction to Gingrich’s consulting work among middle-aged and older adults, 40 and up.

Romney has a different challenge — broadening the appeal of his work experience beyond higher-income Americans. Favorable views are a bit higher among people with incomes of $100,000 or more compared with those earning $50,000 or less, 43 percent vs. 33 percent.

METHODOLOGY — This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cell phone Jan. 25-29, 2012, among a random national sample of 1,005 adults. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points. The survey was produced for ABC News by Langer Research Associates of New York, N.Y., with sampling, data collection and tabulation by SSRS/Social Science Research Solutions of Media, Pa.

SHOWS:
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus