Jan 9, 2012 3:44pm

Independent Voters on the Rise but Do They Matter?

ap mitt romney greets supporter ll 111212 wblog Independent Voters on the Rise but Do They Matter?

Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo

A day before the nation’s first primary in New Hampshire, Republican front-runner Mitt Romney is busy courting independent voters, a burgeoning group that has the power to sway the results in this year’s presidential election.

Forty percent of voters identified themselves as politically independent in 2011, according to a new Gallup poll released today, the highest number recorded in the poll yet. The previous high for independents was 39 percent in 1995 and 2007. Democrats won both presidential races in the following years.

Independent voters are an increasingly important voting bloc. They have outnumbered both Democrats and Republicans continuously for the past two and a half years, by far the longest period in which they’ve done so in ABC News-Washington Post polls dating back to 1981.

Gallup’s recent poll bears mixed news for the two parties. While the gap between those who identified as Democrats and those who said they were Republicans widened to 4 percent, more independents appeared to lean toward the Republican Party than to the Democratic Party and the split between the two was equal.

“Increased independent identification is not uncommon in the year before a presidential election year, but the sluggish economy, record levels of distrust in government and unfavorable views of both parties helped to create an environment that fostered political independence more than in any other pre-election year,” Gallup stated.

Some experts, however, advise caution about the potential impact of independent voters in this election cycle, citing data showing that most in this voting bloc are still partisan and tend to lean more on one party or the other.

Additionally, many Americans who identify themselves as independent have little interest in the political process and might not actually show up in the polls to vote.

Swing voters, experts say, are really the ones who are influential and can be swayed either way in the general election. But they are a lot smaller commodity than independents generally.

Swing voters played an important role in 2008. Along with minority groups and the youth, they helped propel Barack Obama to the presidency.

“There is a tendency to exaggerate the proportion of independents in the electorate and their impact on the election,” said Alan Abramowitz, professor of political science at Emory University in Atlanta. “When you narrow it down, look at actual voters, the turnout rate among independents is lower. When you look at actual voters and look at those who are truly uncommitted, you find that you’re down to less than 10 percent of the actual voters.”

Obama’s win in 2008, Abramowitz says, was in large part because of President George W. Bush’s unpopularity and the dismal economy, which pushed higher-than-normal independent voters to take to the polls.

But others refute the idea that the influence of  independent voters is a myth, and argue that even though they might lean toward one party, that preference can change over time and is a point that candidates should keep in mind when campaigning.

“Independent voters are no myth, they matter, and (when you include among them independent partisans) they absolutely sway elections,” wrote Todd Eberly, an assistance professor at St. Mary’s College of Maryland. “Indeed, the present and highly competitive political era in which we are living is a direct result of a decrease in partisan attachment among a growing number of voters.”

Where these independent voters are concentrated will also make a difference in the general election.

“Obviously, their influence is going to depend on where they are. It doesn’t matter if you have a bunch of independent voters tussling in Texas because the state is so overwhelmingly Republican,” said Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto, a senior fellow at the Bernard Center for Women, Politics & Public Policy in Potomac, Md.

Still, the key for candidates on both sides of the political aisle this year will be to energize the base and get them to vote, as is evident in the trends on both sides thus far.

“The key thing Obama campaign needs to do – not to say they should neglect swing voters – but it’s more important for them to make sure they get their own base unified,” Abramowitz said. “He’s probably not going to do as well with swing voters this time because he’s not going to have George Bush in the White House.”

Many in this voting bloc also feel that Obama has failed to live up to his promises of change and hope.

For Republicans, reaching out to independents is just as challenging of a task, if not a bigger one. They have the added pressure of not only courting a Republican base divided on the candidates, but wooing voters in moderate states such as New Hampshire and Florida where independents make up a large chunk of the voting bloc in the primaries. And if Iowa is any indication, that group is likely to come out strong Tuesday night. Independents turned out in bigger-than-usual numbers in the nation’s first caucus and helped push Rep. Ron Paul to a third place finish in Iowa.

It could be an important group for Republicans in November as they vie to beat the incumbent president. But attracting swing voters could be a tough task in an environment where the Republican base is growing increasingly conservative.

Romney has been struggling to sell his conservative credentials to a Republican base that’s wary of his record on health care and other moderate policy stances as governor. The independent vote could help him make up for the loss that might result from that skepticism, but it will be a difficult task, experts say.

Whoever the GOP candidate is will have to show that he’s “not just about the base but they’re for the large audience,” Soto said. “It’s about America. It’s about getting our country on track, not about catering to the base, which will be difficult for Romney to do because he has spent months and months on the base and he would have to pivot.”

Romney has been targeting independent voters in New Hampshire, a socially liberal state where there are more undeclared voters than either Democrats or Republicans. Because they can vote in the GOP primary – up to 44 percent of voters in Tuesday’s primary are expected to be undeclared – this bloc is key to ensuring that the former governor of neighboring Massachusetts emerges victorious.

The same is true of Florida, where polls show independent voters could make a difference. Unregistered voters account for about a quarter of the electorate in the Sunshine state.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Independents give the winning edge to the candidate. Obama would not be in the white house without the independents. The 2012 election will be decided by the independents. Besides Ron Paul none of the Republican candidates have the backing of the independents and therefore if Ron Paul is not the Republican nominee then Obama wins.

Posted by: Girish | January 9, 2012, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

GIRISH – Even if Ron Paul were to get the nomination he would not win the Presidency. He is too isolationist and too off the wall for most people. He would never get through many of the things he wants. Federal reserve and getting rid of about 80% of the government is NOT going to happen.

Posted by: pksk531 | January 9, 2012, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

There are two types of “independent voters”, those that refuse to take responsibility for the destruction of our economy by Bush administration policies and the bandwagon jumpers.

Posted by: dan | January 9, 2012, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Interesting title to the story. All I have to say is every vote count no matter who you vote for. Voting proves patriotism.

Posted by: MTATL67 | January 9, 2012, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Independents got us into this mess and hopefully they have learned their lesson and will help get un out of the worst administration in history. Debt by all 43 Presidents was $6.3 Trillion, debt added by Obama is $6.5 Trillion so far. That should be enough said!

Posted by: Freedom | January 9, 2012, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

As an independent voter I heard from ABC That the government today announced that its changing its national symbol to the CONDOM because it more accurately reflects the government’s political stance. A condom allows for inflation, halts production, destroys the next generation, protects a bunch of pricks, and gives you a sense of security while you’re actually being screwed! Damn it just doesn’t get more accurate than that. I guess if the rubber fits,wear it. ABC reporters are so clueless.

Posted by: Steve | January 9, 2012, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Independents may not be of much concern in states where primaries are already being conducted as the professor from Emory said. However, that leaves out a massive number of concerned voters. I am particularly offended by this:

“Obviously, their influence is going to depend on where they are. It doesn’t matter if you have a bunch of independent voters tussling in Texas because the state is so overwhelmingly Republican,” said Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto, a senior fellow at the Bernard Center for Women, Politics & Public Policy in Potomac, Md.

As an independent in Texas, I have felt that my vote would not matter in the long term presidential electoral process for too long. After finding Americans Elect, a nonpartisan process in which a third presidential candidate will be nominated via an online convention, I feel like my independent vote actually does matter. I urge people to seriously consider using Americans Elect to directly vote for a presidential candidate, rather than feeling like your vote means nothing.

Posted by: Mariah | January 10, 2012, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Independents in many states are not allowed to vote in Primarys because the voting system has been set up to benefit the the two party system, so to say we Independents don’t vote is misleading – it’s better to focus on what we do in the general elections where we are able to vote. I voted the last election cycles and intend to be there this year. My problem after watching both parties in action – I have no one to vote for because neither side is offering up candidates that care about anything but themselves!

Posted by: Fed Up in USA | January 10, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.