Jan 10, 2012 6:00am

New Hampshire for Dummies: Why the First Primary Is Important

The first polls are now opening in New Hampshire, one week after Mitt Romney’s eight-vote win in the Iowa caucuses.

Will Mitt Romney win big? Can Jon Huntsman become the Granite State’s Rick Santorum? And, more importantly, what happens in New Hampshire and why is it important?

With its early vote, the Granite State has a chance to adjust expectations and momentum in the Republican presidential race, before the candidates move onto South Carolina and Florida. And it has a decent track record, slightly better than Iowa’s, of predicting eventual GOP nominees.

Heading into primary day, Mitt Romney figures to run away with the primary vote, but the contest for second place is in full swing. Romney (41 percent) holds a big lead in the latest major poll, conducted Jan. 5 – 8 by WMUR/UNH, trailed successively by Ron Paul (17 percent), Huntsman (11 percent), Santorum (11 percent) and Newt Gingrich (8 percent).

Romney’s big lead is nothing new. The former governor has led by double digits in all but one major New Hampshire poll since April. Huntsman, meanwhile, skipped Iowa and has dedicated the early part of his campaign to New Hampshire. If Huntsman shows well today, New Hampshire could do for him what Iowa did for Santorum, supplying a new wave of media attention, money and raised standing. If not, his campaign will likely struggle to gain traction going forward.

What Happens in New Hampshire

New Hampshire is drawing a lot of attention from candidates in 2012, but not as much as it did in 2008.

Like in Iowa, where spending on TV ads fell 85 percent from 2008, spending by candidates and independent groups is also way down in New Hampshire this year, according to a source who tracks ad buys in the state.

New Hampshire’s primary works quite differently from Iowa’s caucuses, where Republicans last week gathered in auditoriums and handed in paper ballots – in some cases, blank pieces of paper – with proceedings opened and closed by the gavels of precinct-caucus chairs. The New Hampshire primary is administered by New Hampshire’s Secretary of State, just like a regular election. The first polls open at 6 a.m. ET, and the last polls will close at 8 p.m. ET.

Independents can vote in today’s primary by re-registering as Republicans at polling places. (Democrats can’t re-register as Republicans on primary day.) If independents turn out in force, they could prove beneficial to Paul, in particular, whose support typically falls outside mainstream Republican bounds. New Hampshire has far more independents than Republicans: Of its 767,383 voters, 312,621 (41 percent) are registered as “undeclared,” while 231,611 (30 percent) are registered as Republicans.

New Hampshire has a decent track record of projecting the eventual Republican nominee. Since 1979, a state law has required New Hampshire Republicans to schedule their primary before any other state’s, and in years without an incumbent since 1980, New Hampshire has gone three for five (60 percent) in picking the eventual Republican nominee, the exceptions being John McCain’s 2000 victory over George W. Bush and Pat Buchanan’s win in 1996.

Iowa, by contrast, has gone two for five (40 percent) since 1980, picking only Bob Dole in 1996 and Bush in 2000.

See a list of past winners of the Iowa caucuses.

If Iowa deserves the criticism it has taken over un-representational demographics, as the nation’s first vote, then so does New Hampshire. Racially, New Hampshire has a larger proportional white population (94 percent) than the nation as a whole (72 percent) and a smaller Hispanic/Latino population (3 percent) than the nation (16 percent), according to 2010 Census data.

What’s at Stake?

To secure the GOP nomination, candidates will need to win delegates, and there aren’t many delegates to be won in New Hampshire.

New Hampshire will send 12 delegates to the Republican National Convention, out of 2,286 total, after losing half its delegates under a Republican National Committee (RNC) penalty for holding its primary before the approved February date range. The RNC adopted new rules in August to push back the start of the 2012 GOP race, but after Florida jumped the line, New Hampshire moved its date earlier along with Iowa and South Carolina.

That’s fewer delegates than Iowa will send (28), but the Hawkeye State’s delegates are “unbound,” free to support any candidate they choose, regardless of Romney’s narrow win. In that regard, New Hampshire is more important to the delegate race than its immediate predecessor on the primary-caucus calendar.

The Granite State will award its delegates proportionally, depending on how each candidate performs in the statewide vote. Every candidate who wins 10 percent of the vote will win one delegate, plus another delegate for each additional 10 percent won. It’s likely that not every candidate will meet the 10-percent threshold, and the remaining delegates will be awarded to the statewide winner. For instance, if Huntsman wins with 20 percent of the vote, he’ll collect two delegates, plus the remaining delegates not awarded to any candidate.

So while New Hampshire is important because of its timing, the momentum it can bestow and the attention it receives from candidates and media, if the GOP’s 2012 contest becomes a drawn-out battle for delegates, the first-in-the-nation primary won’t weigh as heavily on the outcome.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Come on New Hampshire give Huntsman a chance! Best one of the bunch to beat Obama and be a really great president.

Posted by: Indymind | January 10, 2012, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Huntsman says he is anti lobbyist to the point of wanting structural change in government. Let’s see if he really means it. At least he doesn’t stand up there and chatterbox about how corporations are people or how he loves to fire people. Romney’s confused. He doesn’t know what the word “people” means!

Posted by: sameagain | January 10, 2012, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I hate how the media plays such a heavy influence in our own decisions—they have continually marginalized candidates (Huntsman, Paul) and play favorites. People are smart enough to make their own decisions and they don’t need the media to choose for them. Shame on them for such biased reporting! Elections and voting should be based on a candidate’s credentials, not the media’s favorites or whoever has the money to buy the most airtime to play phony ads. THIS IS RIDICULOUS.

I’m rooting for you Huntsman!

Posted by: AB | January 10, 2012, 9:08 am 9:08 am

sameafgain At least he doesn’t stand up there and chatterbox about how corporations are people or how he loves to fire people.++++I dare you to post Romney’s ENTIRE response concerning firing people. Posted by: susan | January 10, 2012, 8:52 am

Interesting response. So you’re cool with Mitt saying “Corporations are people, my friend” (because you didn’t whine to sameagain about that), but you are NOT cool with someone using the “I like to fire people who work for me” statement. As I said yesterday, Mitt used a very poor choice of words with his ‘fire people’ line, but the sentiment, in context, is one that most everyone probably agrees with. His ‘corporations are people’ line, on the other hand, is just plain stupid pandering to his corporate cronies.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 9:08 am 9:08 am

A CYNIC | JANUARY 10, 2012, 9:08 AM==== “I like to fire people who work for me” ====You still got it wrong..Loser. .

Posted by: susan | January 10, 2012, 9:16 am 9:16 am

The irrelevancy of the New Hampshire primary stems from the fact that none of these candidates can defeat President Obama in November. In fact President Obama’s re-election is irrelevant if he doesn’t get a working Congress.

The President is going to run against Congress, if he tie can anyone of these candidates to the “do nothing” Congress he will win by even a wider margin. The key to getting out of this recession is whether democrats can win in the Senate and House races.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Its just a matter of how big Obummer is going to lose and how many Senate seats he is going to take out the door with him. Obummer…one and done.

Posted by: jackson | January 10, 2012, 9:36 am 9:36 am

ABC actually acknowledged RON PAUL was in the race ASTOUNDING. The headline is insulting and ABC really no longer is involved in News, only spin now. It’s deeply saddening to watch cable election infomercials masquerade as news and the networks now are just as happy to bring biased trash to serve up.

Posted by: Curt | January 10, 2012, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Blue collar and most white collar Americans do not see these republican candidates sharing their aspirations and values. They like President Obama and understand he can’t be very effective with a Congress that obstructs delays and blocks every proposal he makes.

Mitch McConnell sealed the republican’s fate when he said the “only” goal of the republicans in Congress was to defeat the President and then proceeded to show just that. Americans want to believe that most politians want to do what is best for their country despite who is President.

The tea party has taken over the republicans in the Congress even though they are a small minority. The tea party mimics their sponsor, the health insurance industry who hate this President for trying to break their monopoly on Americans health care. It won’t work; the tea party has lost all credibility with the American people.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 10:16 am 10:16 am

tmferretti Mitch McConnell sealed the republican’s fate when he said the “only” goal of the republicans in Congress was to defeat the President and then proceeded to show just that. ===And since he has said that democrats got shellacked in 2010,2011 losing Kennedys seat and the 90 year old dem seat of Weiners. Virginia legislature in full control of Repubs and Ohio spanked Obamacare. You make me laugh…..thanks.

Posted by: gary | January 10, 2012, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Jon Huntsman is the best the Republicans have to offer and he is a GOOD offering unlike the rest of the zoo we’ve been listening to for the past 6 months. Mitt Romney has annoyed me more with every passing day. His smug act because he THINKS he WILL be the nominee and the fact that he talks down to just about everyone he speaks to. Also, he IS the biggest flip-flopper I’ve EVER seen. He was Governor here in Mass and I did vote for him but I soon realized that he had no real interest in being our Governor but rather that job was just a neccessary step to running for President. Huntsman would be the SMARTEST choice for the Republicans but when did they EVER do the SMART thing!!!

Posted by: demNme5 | January 10, 2012, 10:29 am 10:29 am

GARY

The main thrust of the tea party Representatives and Senators was their position to go to Congress and end the grid lock. They’ve failed miserably.

Senator Brown who took Kennedy’s seat is in big trouble from Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts and will probably lose. He was the most vocal republican slamming the tea party House during the tax reduction debate. He is trying to get away from the tea party as much as possible. Most of the other republicans running this year are doing the same.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 10:57 am 10:57 am

susan | January 10, 2012, 9:16 am post —— Ha ha ha! Hilarious. You got nothing of substance, so you attack. Typical Republican idiot. Unable to discuss or debate with logic or reason. Maybe you should listen the the people in your Party and ‘get back in the kitchen where you belong.’ Or go be submissive to your husband, as Bachmann said last summer. The Republican Party hates women, so a woman who is a Republican is a really stupid person.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 10, 2012, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Funny how Cynics nasty reply stays up but my rebuttals get taken down

Posted by: susan | January 10, 2012, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

The only primary that is truly important, is the first one that is representative of the country, overall, and that is FL.

The rest are simply exercises in special interest groups.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 10, 2012, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

RICK McDANIEL

I think South Carolina is important also. It will show if the tea party is relevant or not. If Mitt Romney wins it shows that the GOP establishment is still in control of the party. South Carolina is one of the most conservative states in the union, along with Arizona. If conservative republicans defer to the establishment and support Mitt the other candidates are waging an exercise in futility and need to go home.

SUSAN

We’ve all lost posts on this blog, democrats and republicans; it’s due to programmer’s software incompetency, not any type of censorship.

Posted by: tmferretti | January 10, 2012, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.