Newt’s Make Or Break Moment In Florida (The Note)
By MICHAEL FALCONE (@michaelpfalcone) and AMY WALTER (@amyewalter)
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — With the Florida primary creeping up in just five days, it’s now or never for Newt Gingrich .
The former House Speaker will need a strong performance at tonight’s debate in Jacksonville — the final face-to-face meeting between all four candidates before voters go to the polls on Tuesday — in order to stall his main rival, Mitt Romney.
Gingrich turned in a mediocre performance at Monday night’s debate and poll numbers out yesterday indicate his momentum may be ebbing here after a first-place finish in the South Carolina primary last weekend.
Not only that, he’s getting pummeled on the airwaves by Romney and a pro-Romney super PAC, which are spending millions to plant seeds of doubt in the minds of Florida voters about Gingrich’s “erratic” behavior, his record in Congress and his work for the mortgage finance company, Freddie Mac, among other things.
Looks like it’s been time and money well spent.
A new CNN-Time Magazine-Opinion Research Corporation poll out late yesterday finds Romney and Gingrich in a statistical dead heat in Florida. And although the survey shows Gingrich taking a large bite out of Romney’s lead here just within the last week, there’s an unmistaken trend line that should be cause for concern at Gingrich headquarters.
On the first day voters were polled (Sunday) Gingrich was up 38 percent to 32 percent, but on the second two days (Monday and Tuesday) it was Romney who had the advantage — 38 percent to 29 percent. http://abcn.ws/zhrDtf
And a new Quinnipiac University poll out today shows that in a hypothetical general election matchup Romney would be the stronger candidate to run against Obama at least as far as Florida voters are concerned. Romney and Obama are tied at 45 percent a piece while the president leads Gingrich 50 percent to 39 percent among registered voters.
All four candidates meet tonight at 8 p.m. for a debate hosted by CNN, the Republican Party of Florida, and the Hispanic Leadership Network. Ron Paul is not competing actively in Florida and Rick Santorum’s poll numbers are so low, he looks out of contention.
So, Gingrich and Romney will likely have the stage mostly to themselves to make their closing pitches to voters and to make an impression that will no doubt stick with Floridians as they cast their ballots next week.
NEWT’ S SILVER LINING. A dispatch from ABC’s Jonathan Karl from Florida’s Spacecoast: “A quick note about Gingrich’s crowds in Florida: They are enormous and they are enthusiastic. In fact, Gingrich is attracting bigger, more energetic crowds here in Florida than I have seen gathered for any of the candidates in any of the other states so far.” http://abcn.ws/AARgMQ
More from Jon Karl about the battle for the Sunshine State on “Good Morning America” today. WATCH: http://abcn.ws/y277MP
HIGH STAKES IN FLORIDA. ABC News Political Director Amy Walter notes that a win by Newt Gingrich would all but guarantee a long, drawn-out contest. “It will legitimize Gingrich as a serious contender (not just a guy who got lucky in South Carolina). It will lead to lots of hand-wringing by GOP leaders. The cable chatterers will be in full-blown bloviate mode about the state of the dysfunction in the Republican Party. A Romney win doesn’t guarantee a quick end to the contest, but it would slow Gingrich’s momentum. Other factors that could dampen Newt-mentum include the fact that there’s just one debate scheduled for the entire month of February and that there are only caucuses, not primaries, for most of that month. Rick Santorum and Ron Paul have all but conceded the state to the two frontrunners. Florida is a winner-take-all contest, which means all 50 delegates go to the top vote-getter. There’s no incentive to try and battle for third or fourth place. And while both remain committed to staying in the race, it’s clear that, for now, the battle for the nomination is a two-man race between Gingrich and Romney.” http://abcn.ws/ymnLap
TUNE IN: DIANE SAWYER GOES ONE-ON-ONE WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA. Less than 48 hours after his third State of the Union address, ABCs Diane Sawyer sits down with President Barack Obama in Las Vegas where the President is hitting the road to make his case to the American people. The wide-ranging interview will give viewers the whole picture as the President attempts to address the essential issues of jobs, the economy, health care, and taxes among other topics. The exclusive network interview will air tonight on a special edition of World news broadcast from Las Vegas. Portions of the interview will also be featured across ABC News broadcasts and platforms including “Nightline,” “Good Morning America,” and on ABCNews.com
DEMOCRATIC COUNTER-PROGRAMMING. The Democratic National Committee is demanding more transparency from Mitt Romney. In a press conference this afternoon in Jacksonville, DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz “will call on Romney to meet the standard his dad set and release at least a dozen years of returns — but will suggest that he also go further and release tax returns from his time at Bain Capital,” according to the DNC.
The DNC is also rolling out Cindy Hewitt, a Miami resident who served as a human resources manager at Dade Behring before, as the DNC puts it “Romney’s Bain drove the company into the ground. As she recently told the Tampa Bay Times, ‘What bothers me most is that Romney’s campaign says he was a creator of jobs. I didn’t see that in any way, shape or form. He didn’t create jobs. He slashed and burned jobs.’”
ROMNEY’S ONE PERCENT ‘FLIP-FLOP’? The Democratic super PAC American Bridge is out with a new web video this morning contrasting two very different answers Romney gave about how he feels about the so-called “one percent” vs. the “99 percent.” The group is calling it Romney’s “latest flip.” Not long ago, Romney told someone at one of his campaign events who asked what he would do for the 99 percent that like President Obama the man was trying to “divide America.” But at a Univision forum in Miami yesterday, Romney said he wasn’t worried about one percent — “the one percent’s doing fine, I want to help the 99 percent.” WATCH: http://bit.ly/wiUp68
DEBATE DAY DETAILS: Tonight’s debate will be hosted by CNN, the Republican Party of Florida and the Hispanic Leadership Network. CNN lead political anchor Wolf Blitzer will moderate the two-hour presidential debate which will take place at the University of North Florida in Jacksonville at 8 p.m. ET. In addition to questions posed to the candidates by Blitzer and Florida Republicans in the audience, CNN will solicit questions and comments submitted in real-time from CNN.com, the CNN Politics fan page on Facebook and by using the #CNNDebate hashtag on Twitter.
THE BUZZ
JEB BUSH’S ADVICE FOR THE GOP. The Former Florida governor who has said he won’t endorse before next Tuesday’s primary pens an Op-Ed in the Washington Post today with his take on “Four ways Republicans can win Hispanics back”: “First, we need to recognize this is not a monochromatic community but, rather, a deeply diverse one. Hispanics in this country include Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans and many others. Some came here 50 years ago to make a better life; others came last year. Some have lots of education, some have none. … Second, we should echo the aspirations of these voters. The American immigrant experience is the most aspirational story ever told. … Third, we should press for an overhaul of our education system. Republicans have the field to themselves on this issue. Teachers unions and education bureaucrats have blocked Democrats from serious reform — it will happen only with Republican political leadership. … Finally, we need to think of immigration reform as an economic issue, not just a border security issue. Numerous polls show that Hispanics agree with Republicans on the necessity of a secure border and enforceable and fair immigration laws to reduce illegal immigration and strengthen legal immigration.” http://wapo.st/wR7DOJ
DON’T MESS WITH MARCO. ABC News’ Matthew Jaffe reports that Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio’s criticism of a Spanish-language ad released by Newt Gingrich that hit rival Mitt Romney for being “anti-immigrant” caused the former House speaker’s campaign to pull the spot. Gingrich and Romney spent Wednesday feuding in an attempt to win over Latino voters at a Univision forum in Miami. Romney blasted Gingrich for the “anti-immigrant” line in the ad, saying it was “very sad” and “unbecoming of a presidential candidate.” But it was not Romney’s rebuke of the ad, rather Rubio’s, that prompted the campaign’s decision to scrap the spot. Rubio, the Republican senator considered a likely contender for the No. 2 slot on the Republican ticket, told the Miami Herald that the language used by Gingrich in the ad was “more than just unfortunate – it’s inaccurate, inflammatory and doesn’t belong in the campaign.” “The truth,” Rubio said, “is that neither of these two men is anti-immigrant. Both are pro-legal immigration and both have positive messages that play well in the Hispanic community.” Spokespeople for the Gingrich campaign said Wednesday that they had taken the ad “out of rotation.” http://abcn.ws/w22Yi0
TENSE ON THE TARMAC: OBAMA AND JAN BREWER. Longstanding tension between Republican Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer and Democratic President Barack Obama flared into the public spotlight today just after Air Force One touched down in Phoenix, ABC’s Jake Tapper and Devin Dwyer report. Brewer, who was on the tarmac to greet Obama, hand-delivered a letter before engaging the president “intensely” for several minutes, including pointing her finger directly at him, according to Politico’s Carrie Budoff Brown, acting as a pool reporter for other media outlets. Accounts from both camps later said the terse talk focused on Brewer’s book— “Scorpions for Breakfast: My Fight Against Special Interests, Liberal Media and Cynical Politicos to Secure America’s Border.” The book, which was released in November, describes a June 2010 Oval Office meeting between Obama and Brewer aimed at diffusing conflicts surrounding Arizona’s controversial state immigration law and the administration’s immigration policy. At the time, the White House called it a “good meeting,” while Brewer’s staff said it was “cordial.” But Brewer paints a much different picture in her book. http://abcn.ws/xBOobW
DEBATE PRIMER: SELF-DEPORTATION EXPLAINED. ABC’s Huma Khan explains self-deportation — an idea that Mitt Romney supports and that Newt Gingrich mocked at a Univision forum Wednesday, saying it was based in fantasy and that his rival “shows no concern for the humanity of the people who are already here.” Nevertheless, the concept itself is real and is rooted in the conservative idea of “attrition through enforcement,” that would, in the words of its chief architect Mark Krikorian, “Shrink the illegal population through consistent, across-the-board enforcement of the immigration law.” The idea is that if laws and restrictions against undocumented residents are enforced more stringently, both at the federal and state level, then those immigrants would have no choice but to leave on their own. A case in point is Arizona, which in April 2010 imposed the toughest crackdown of any state to curb the growth of illegal immigrants. Another case is Alabama, where schools are now required to check their students’ immigration status and law enforcement officials can arrest those who don’t have paperwork. … Liberals say the policy equates to mass deportation. http://abcn.ws/y9xLK8
WHO’S TWEETING?
@jonkarl: The Mount Dora Bible School band waits to play for Newt at a tea party rally in Mount Dora, FL img.ly/d9EY
@RyanGOP: Florida Sun-Sentinel endorses @MittRomney ”a steady and competent leader for these divisive and turbulent times”sunsent.nl/xKTih9
@HowardKurtz: Newt Tones It Down – as he tries to move from protest candidate to plausible nominee thebea.st/zNdnuE
@jmartpolitico: The occupy movement calls them the 1 pct, but Mitt has another word for em: his base. On the GOP’s class divide politi.co/xfGJ77
@TheFix: Why Florida is political Thunderdome. Two men enter, one man leaves. ow.ly/8H3MB
POLITICAL RADAR:
–Mitt Romney will deliver a speech at a Jacksonville paper company in the morning.
–Newt Gingrich starts his day in Mount Dora, Florida with a Tea Party rally at the Lakeside Inn. Gingrich then travels to Jacksonville for a Veterans event at the University of North Florida.
–Rick Santorum will hold two events in Tallahassee ending with a “Faith, Family, and Freedom” town hall. Santorum will also be in Pensacola for an Escambia County Republican Party Rally.
–2008 Republican nominee John McCain is in Florida speaking at two town halls on behalf of 2012 Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney. The town halls will take place in Sun City Center and Madeira Beach, Florida.
–Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul will head to Jacksonville, Florida this evening for the CNN Debate at the University of North Florida beginning at 8 p.m. ET.
–ABC’s Josh Haskell (@HaskellBuzz)
Check out The Note’s Futures Calendar: http://abcn.ws/ZI9gV
* Get The Note delivered to your inbox every day.
* For breaking political news and analysis check out The Note blog: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/and ABCNews.com/Politics: http://abcnews.com/politics

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Newt as President will turn America into the biggest joke in the International community. There is nothing respecatble about Newt.
Posted by: mandy barton | January 26, 2012, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Why doesn’t Santorum drop out of the race, and let us focus on the two front runners? You gotta know when to fold them, and he’s just become a bothersome little pest.
Posted by: Sarah | January 26, 2012, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I was on the ground knocking doors in South Carolina leading up to the election, and no one in the media is talking about what I think is the single biggest factor contributing to Newt’s victory: Mitt Romney’s faith.
My assignment in SC was to knock doors to speak with voters who had previously identified as undecided or leaning toward Mitt Romney. Most of those I spoke to who flipped away from Romney in favor of Gingrich agreed they thought Romney was more electable. Not one indicated that she cared about Romney releasing his tax returns. Almost every single person who would share with me her reason for voting for Gingrich cited Mitt Romney’s faith as the principle factor. In fact, even those who supported Mitt Romney would often tell me they did so in spite of his faith.
South Carolina shifted the momentum–no question. But Newt has not magically transformed himself from unelectable to electable. He is still an adulterer, he is still unethical, and the Democrats would still prefer to run against him rather than Romney. Mitt lost because South Carolinians were searching hard for an alternative, not based on legitimate policy differences, but based on a deep-seated and generational bias against Mormons. Unfortunately, few are willing to be candid about this bias with the media, and the media is therefore not accurately reporting about what I believe actually happened.
Maybe South Carolina demonstrated that Mitt Romney is not as electable as the public was beginning to think. Maybe Romney’s faith really is an insurmountable obstacle. (I tend to believe that evangelicals will vote against Obama regardless.) But Gingrich’s victory in South Carolina absolutely does not speak to his electabilty in a general election. Rather, it shows that evangelicals will vote for almost anyone (other than President Obama) to avoid voting for a Mormon.
Posted by: Bill Drury | January 26, 2012, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Newt is the WORST thing for this nation and just because his rhetoric is full of hate filled ideas and charged with his usual style of racism, there are STILL lot of good people in this nation that WILL turn him out to pasture when their time to vote comes up. What is wrong with people that WANT such a person as their President????? Even those on the RIGHT don’t want him, doesn’t that tell people ANYTHING?? This man is NO GOOD!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 26, 2012, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Go, Newt, we need you to help us colonize Mars. As nominee, you will be Obama’s early Christmas gift in November 2012
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 26, 2012, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Rick Santorum and Ron Paul are just spectators in these debates. Newt and Mitt are the stars of the show.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 26, 2012, 11:05 am 11:05 am
___”Why doesn’t Santorum drop out of the race, and let us focus on the two front runners? You gotta know when to fold them, and he’s just become a bothersome little pest.”
POSTED BY: SARAH | JANUARY 26, 2012, 10:21 AM 10:21 AM_________________Exactly what my man Kenny Rogers would say.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 26, 2012, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Perhaps we should work backwards to solve our US economic, full employment Rubik’s cube.
1) full employment = Balanced budget.
2) full housing market recovery = full employment.
3) reduce per-capita credit cards debt + student loans debt = full housing market recovery.
4) reduce regressive taxes (gas,sales,payroll) = reduce per-capita credit cards debt.
5) reduce college tuition = reduce student loans debt.
Do these Rubik’s cube steps create a full employment, US economic recovery? You be the judge.
Florida has high sales and gas taxes. Since everything you buy, like groceries, are trucked in. These diesel fuel taxes are added in. Have you noticed grocery prices lately! People are simply paying for necessities with their credit cards.
Mr. Gingrich has mentioned that full employment will result in a balanced budget that happened in the 1990s. Full employment will mean fewer people collecting food stamps, welfare, energy assistance, etc. Plus it will mean more revenues collected from payroll taxes, federal income taxes, etc. Just google the unemployment rate vs balanced budgets that happened in the 1990s…
We must revsist how regressive taxes are having on our economy. Then make the required changes from this study.
Posted by: David Thelen | January 26, 2012, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Dub, flub and flubdub: Newt Gingrich has gone too far and responsible Republicans interested in a discussion of the issues facing our country are quite aware of Newt’s willingness to provoke the lynch-mob instincts of a few members of the debate audiences and sidetrack meaningful display of the candidates’ leadership abilities.
When the cowardly inclined cannot get their hot air pumped into a blowtorch by jeering toadies, they are quickly looked upon as a loathsome inconsequential that is easily avoided. And the harsh voices of echoed support also fade away as rapidly as do the would-be sources that can no longer hide in a thinning throng.
Once discredited because of his own conduct, Speaker of House Newt’s closest henchmen soon mumbled in total disinterest, “Newt who?”
Posted by: Sas Osborne | January 26, 2012, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I need to vent about this whole election fiasco!! It’s getting tedious.
Background — I am a Democrat. I am a liberal. My religious affiliations have included Roman Catholic, Born Again Christian, Mormon and presently (through life experiences) assert that there is no god.
As pertains this presidential election – I want to vote for Obama, but I’m having a hard time reconciling his broken campaign promise to stand on the picket lines with union members when the need arose. I don’t know about you, but I didn’t hear or see a hair of him in Wisconsin and before I vote for him I want to know WHY!
As regards the Republicans, it’s pathetic to hear and see all the misrepresentations, lies and manipulations by not only the candidates, but the media as well. I’m tired of seeing Ron Paul being astrocized and ignored at Republican debates. I’m tired of people and media placing so much emphasis on Romney’s Mormon affiliation.
Seriously, Ron Paul is a breath of fresh air. He is incredibly tied to the Consitution as written by our founding fathers. His knowledge and understanding of it are incredible and admirable and leads to consistency and transparency to his beliefs and ideology.
Yes, Romney is Mormon and to hold that as a negative is appalling especially when that opinion is held by people who don’t have a damn clue about what Mormonism is all about. Yes, they practiced polygamy. No, not acceptable in today’s environment. But, what about Santorum’s catholicism? How come no one is concerned about the roots of Catholicism that saw the torture, burning, killing of thousands of individuals during the Middle Ages when christianity was trying to spread it’s tentacles throughout Europe? Where’s the outcriy about the families, towns and cultures destroyed by ‘christians’ during this time and the wealth acquired by them, when they took over the property, belongings, lands of the people they slaughtered in the name of god.
Why is Romney weak? I would agree in part because of his Mormon affiliation. How is that? Assuming Romney was born into Mormonism, it would follow that for all of his years, he heard on a consistent and regular basis from his church elders that ‘judging others’ is NOT a job that is ours. It’s a job that remains with god AND GOD ALONE!! He did not begin his candidacy casting dispurgencies on his fellow candidates. He did not judge them as mormons are taught. Compounding this would be another tenet of Mormonism — TOLERANCE!! If you don’t judge people for what they are and what they do, then the result can be nothing but TOLERANCE. Something that the evangelicals have no understanding of.
So, did I vent enough? I’m tired of the ignorance, hatred and stupidity of not the american people as a whole, but of the american people with religious affiliations that foster hatred and intolerance of anyone or anybody except themselves. THAT IS NOT WHAT FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY is ALL ABOUT and it has no place in the political process!!
OK. I’m done.
Posted by: Rosemary Mangino | January 26, 2012, 11:41 am 11:41 am
The next election is shaping up to be as big of a sham as the last. Do you know why Sarah Palin’s bus tour was really canceled? Do you know why she stayed 30 miles away from the second debate and chose the death of Steve Jobs to announce that she’s not running? Know what leaked out? Sarah Palin and Cain aren’t in the race for the same reason, the truth leaked out. Search PalinsDirtyLittleSecret for the biggest cover up in history
Posted by: David Longdale | January 29, 2012, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm