Obama Tackles Rising College Costs
ANN ARBOR, Mich. — At a campaign-style rally this morning, President Obama told an energetic crowd of students that colleges have a responsibility to control tuition costs because a higher education “is not a luxury; it’s an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford.”
“We can’t just keep on subsidizing skyrocketing tuition,” the president argued as he announced a proposal to withhold federal aid from colleges and universities that fail to get their tuition costs under control.
“We are putting colleges on notice,” he said. “You can’t assume that you’ll just jack up tuition every single year. If you can’t stop tuition from going up, then the funding you get from taxpayers each year will go down. We should push colleges to do better. We should hold them accountable if they don’t.”
The president assured the 4,000 students packed into the University of Michigan Field House that he understands the financial burden they bear.
“Michelle and I can still remember how long it took us to pay back our student loans,” he said. “I just want all of you to understand, your president and your first lady were in your shoes not that long ago.”
Last year, graduates who took out a loan left college owing an average of $24,000, according to the White House.
Today’s event marked the end of the president’s three day State of the Union tour, which included stops in Iowa, Arizona, Nevada and Colorado, and was the largest by far.
Students waited upwards of five hours yesterday for a coveted ticket and lined up in the snow this morning at dawn to see the president, an impressive feat for morning-adverse college students.
Michigan student Lucy Holland, who just became old enough to vote and supports the president, told ABC that “the Republican primaries have been very divided, conflicted.”
Grey-haired Bob Milstein squeezed in among the college students to get a glimpse of the president he believes is working for the 99 percent. “He’s been trying hard against an opposition that keeps saying ‘no,’” he said.

Email
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
Ron Paul Ad's Call Santorum a 'Fake'
He had a student loan? Which college? Occidental, Columbia or Harvard?
Posted by: Lizzie | January 27, 2012, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
What loans? How much?
Posted by: Nephron | January 27, 2012, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
NEP…. It’s a secret, just like his college records.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 27, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
The student loan takeover by Sallie Mae has only added to rising costs. Anybody can borrow for college, and anybody does. More students borrowing = More students in college = Higher demand = Higher tuition. Colleges get their money up front. College students are debt slaves for decades. Thanks President Obama. You contributed to the problem that you now claim you want to fix. Hope and Change!
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
More students borrowing = More students in college = Higher demand = Higher tuition.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Wrong. The price of commercial products goes not necessarily go up when demand goes up. Check out all electronics and economies of scale. Besides, college is not a for-profit commercial product.
Posted by: Cheers | January 27, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
He is very in touch with the average American. He is a fighter and voice for what we need.
Posted by: TV | January 27, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Thank you President Obama for working for the “People” and not just for the RICH like the Cons do.
Posted by: demNme5 | January 27, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Posted by: Cheers | January 27, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I provide accounting consulting services to two public universities, one private university, and one community college. I understand completely.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Posted by: demNme5 | January 27, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
More middle class Americans have entered the ranks of the poor under Obama than any other President in US history.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
So let’s see…Obama thinks that if the government stops federal spending on aid to colleges, tuition will go down. Makes sense, since once the colleges see that the free money is shut down, they will have to actually face the reality of what people can spend for college. Now, if he’d only sees that the same argument applies to everywhere else where the government gives out free money.
Posted by: Brian Levine | January 27, 2012, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Do yourself a favor and read a good economics book–Posted by: Susan——————Since when do right-wingers listen to economics books?? Economics books say government spending increases demand which helps grow the economy, and tax rates do not directly effect employment levels—but you’d never know it listening to guys like John Boehner.
Posted by: Sally | January 27, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
These colleges have been building grand buildings and adding things to the campus that really aren’t needed. For years. Susan is right about the non profit part being a myth. Build more, charge more, keep it going up. Your state taxes are helping pay for this as well. We’ve known this was the trend over the last several years as tuition has risen over the rate of inflation big time. And no, they’re not suddenly paying those professors a wad more. Obama is absolutely right to get into this. I’m getting sick and tired of him being put down when he’s trying to do something for the good of this country. We now know we need most people to go to college if possible. For our future. It doesn’t make for a strong nation to continue to price kids out of it. I do not agree with Susan on the loan changes though. I believe the most that changed is who is handling it and we cut out the middle men (banks).
Posted by: lexingtonlady | January 27, 2012, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Hmmm, well, how about ask your head of the Dept of Ed to lower interest rates on student loans? That would help. 6.8 percent is a little high compared to 3.2 percent of one loan [we have] through a private lender. Another thing, make the process easier!! My god, the application and contract for a DOE loan is confusing. It’s easier to get a mortgage at 3 percent!! And I agree, the better educated our citizens, the better overall for the USA. My kid would like to go back for post-grad education, but that means adding more student loans. Now, I will note, being in healthcare, some of her loans have been reduced/% forgiven b/c of her career field. I do appreciate the lenders who provide that, but the DOE isn’t one of ‘em.
Posted by: wildblue | January 27, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
SUSAN: More middle class Americans have entered the ranks of the poor under Obama than any other President in US history.
Actually Susan, you can thank GW Bush for the MESS HE made before he left. The fact that Americans are losing out goes back about 30 YEARS when that Republican HERO Reagan, came up with his “Trickle Down CRAP”. You see, it NEVER trickled and it ALL stayed way up there where that 1% resides NOW. Growth for the wealthy over the past 30 years 275%, growth for the rest, just about a FLATLINE! GW Bush only started TWO wars (UNPAID FOR) and LOWERED Taxes on the GREEDY, yeah he certainly was a joy. Check that one out and perhaps you ought to READ a little about HOW this all came about and the FACT that Obama is getting a good handle on the mess now (Which I’m SURE those of you on the Right DETEST), and when things REALLY improve more and more, this Nation will KNOW without a doubt that the right did NOTHING to help make things better but instead they whined every day while they refused to do their JOBS!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 27, 2012, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Oh, and one more thing — the headline “Obama TACKLES” is entirely misleading. “Tackles” implies he’s trying to actually work a solution to this problem. All he was doing per the article is expressing reelection rhetoric. It’s just dog and pony antics, nothing substantial will come of it.
Posted by: wildblue | January 27, 2012, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“Economics books say government spending increases demand which helps grow the economy…” ——————– Well Sally, you can’t say that our govt isn’t good at spending. Actually GREAT at spending – to the tune of a $16 Trillion dollar debt. How many more Trillions do you think it will take to unemployment down to around 6%? – - And then WHAT do we do about that debt???
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Posted by: demNme5 | January 27, 2012, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Bush hasn’t been in power for three years. Our GDP growth in 2011 was almost HALF of what it was in 2010. We’re also $5 trillion more in debt. Food, gas, and healthcare costs have risen sharply putting a lot of pressure on the poor and middle class. We have the largest dependency class in our history. The housing market was a disaster in 2011. How exactly does that show that Obama has a “good handle on the mess now”? Except to the delusional, it’s obvious he’s driving us off a cliff.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Actually the right does it’s JOBS-we generate the income and pay the taxes that carry 40% of our freeloading fellow citizens that don’t pay ANY income tax.I’m sorry that anybody who is successful seems GREEDY to you.Maybe you can put your spatula down and strive to do something more rewarding than flipping burgers- then you might understand why most successful businessmen are Republicans and most of the losers who can’t cut it are Democrats.
Posted by: Nephron | January 27, 2012, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Obama is just electioneering. All talk–no action.
Posted by: Firefly | January 27, 2012, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Here’s a problem: in 2002, for every $4 a university needed, $3 came from taxes, $1 came from tuition. Then taxes were slashed. Someone/something had to suffer. Higher education was one of those that suffered. Today, for every $4 a university needs, 82 cents comes from taxes, the remaining $3.18 has to come from tuition. Ergo, tuition rises. If your local university has not tripled tuition in the last 10 years, they are operating on less money today than they were 10 years ago.
Posted by: Amy Brooks | January 27, 2012, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“Economics books say government spending increases demand which helps grow the economy, and tax rates do not directly effect employment levels—but you’d never know it listening to guys like John Boehner.”
Posted by: Sally | January 27, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Only the clueless Keynesians say that. They’re obviously wrong because we’ve spent more money than any other country in the last three years and our GDP growth in 2011 was half of what it was in 2010. The failure of government spending to create sustained GDP growth is staring you in the face.
Speaking of jobs, how many have you ever created? Oh, I know: zero.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
“Only the clueless Keynesians say that”
————————————–
The Keynesian haven’t been clueless…their predictions have been far more accurate than their critics
For example
The critics predicted that the stimulus would create runaway inflation. They were wrong.
They predicted monetary easing by the Fed would destroy the value of the dollar They were wrong.
They predicted austerity would encourage investors in Europe. They were totally wrong.
They predicted the S&P downgrade would ruin the marketability of US debt. They couldn’t have been more wrong, interest rates actually FELL afterwards.
The Keynesian are clueless…even though they’ve been right all along.
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp | January 27, 2012, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Don’t you just love how ABC positions this article ‘Obama tackles rising college costs’… Really? So now that the annointed one has spoken college costs won’t rise any longer? BS! Obama is all talk and ABC is his lap dog. Journalism is dead at ABC.
Posted by: Rick | January 27, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
e generate the income and pay the taxes that carry 40% of our freeloading fellow citizens that don’t pay ANY income tax.
————————-
I love it! Just keep telling 40% of Americans who pay a larger share of their income in all types of taxes than Mitt Romney does that they’re lazy freeloaders. It’s going to work miracles for you this election.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp | January 27, 2012, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
If you have such a great understanding of finance and economics, why aren’t you rich?
Posted by: Dane | January 27, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
@demnme5 —> your earlier post re Bush & Reagan, et al, is extremely erroneous. The US economy certainly wasn’t perfect under Reagan policies, but like everyone keeps screeching about Obama cleaning up after Bush, so Reagan tried to clean up after Carter’s . It’s a perpetual construct we should all accept. And why do so many ignore congressional contributions?
Posted by: wildblue | January 27, 2012, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Shrimp,prove your claim.What is the average total tax burden for those who pay no Federal income tax?
Posted by: Nephron | January 27, 2012, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I hope you all does to get this right. Been trying to get in college for 6 yaars.
Posted by: LS | January 27, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Susan: 22 Months of economic GROWTH, Job market is improving and BUSH DID CAUSE this. Funny how NO ONE on the right ever mentions their embarrassment GW. We did NOT go into a depression because of the steps Obama took. Obama is running circles around the right in terms of Foreign policy, yet, in the 2004 election, the right wanted the GULLIBLE of this nation to THINK that they and ONLY THEY could keep this Nation safe. Well we’ve already seen how BIG a lie that was and all we need to do is be TRUTHFUL about Obama’s good work and you’d ALL be sputtering about that too. I hope you all remember one thing, when this nation IMPROVES to the point where EVEN you DENYERS can’t get away with all the LIES you spout, that this was ALL done WITHOUT the cooperation of the Babies that are holding their breath in Congress – The REPUBLICANS who would PREFER to see this nation FAIL just to get back the power that they have NO CLUE how to use in a GOOD WAY!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 27, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Once TARP was passed there was NO CHANCE this country was going into a Great Depression, George Bush and his administration CAUSED TARP to be passed,thereby averting all of the predicted disasters that never would have happened anyway.Obama took a run of the mill recession that was already on the road to correction and completely screwed up the recovery by dumping a 800 billion dollar on a stimulus THAT HIS OWN ADVISORS said would not work-thank you N.Y. Times.This act dried up private cedit for 18 months when every prior historical correction relied on infusion of private capital.the MAN HIMSELF stated that if he had not fixed the economy after 3 years HE DID NOT DESERVE RE-ELECTION.Why would REPUBLICANS want to see this NATION fail when they OWN IT as you believe?
Posted by: Nephron | January 27, 2012, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
estimates on the effects of the stimulus from Politifact:
• CBO: Between 1.3 million and 3.6 million jobs saved or created.
• IHS/Global Insight: 2.45 million jobs saved or created.
• Macroeconomic Advisers: 2.3 million jobs saved or created.
• Moody’s Economy.com: 2.5 million jobs saved or created.
——————————————–
If this was a failure it was only because $800 million was way too small to counteract a $5+trillion loss to the wealth of the nation.
Posted by: Jumbo Shrimp | January 27, 2012, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Too late for us…last one will graduate in the fall. I hope it benefits future students.
Posted by: slbmrb | January 27, 2012, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Hey Ms Bruce,
When you “tackle ” a problem, shouldn’t that mean you have “fixed” it?
He hasn’t fixed it.
Misleading headline.
I’m guessing that you are voting for him…
Posted by: KS | January 27, 2012, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
NEP…. It’s a secret, just like his college records. Posted by: Lizzie | January 27, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm __________________________Missing the point once more?
Posted by: Carlos A. Garcia | January 27, 2012, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
$800,000,000,000 divided by 3.6 million jobs created (or saved!) equals $222,222 per job. And – - -
$800,000,000,000 divided by 1.3 million jobs created (or saved!) equals $615,384 per job. We cannot afford too many more of these govt job-creating (or saving (LOL)) “successes”…
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Wlll the Obama regulation machine also try to contol private institutions? Aren’t the free markets worth anything anymore to this president? If you don’t like and/or can’t afford the cost of tuition at College A, don’t go to college A. If college B is more your speed, apply there and attend THERE if that’s what you/your family can afford. If you don’t have food, don’t worry, the government will give you food stamps! If you can’t afford housing, don’t worry, the governent will give you Section 8 vouchers. Can’t afford college? Don’t worry. The government will bully universities into doing things Obama’s way. Yeah, that’s what this country is all about. God help us all.
Posted by: s | January 27, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
They’re obviously wrong because we’ve spent more money than any other country in the last three years and our GDP growth in 2011 was half of what it was in 2010.———– I guess you can read. Go really slow and try to digest this , I know it is probably a little above your intellectual comfort level ( being that you are pretty obviously a conservative ) , but try anyway . ——— “The Pew Center reported in April 2011 the cause of a $12.7 trillion shift in the debt situation, from a 2001 CBO forecast of a cumulative $2.3 trillion surplus by 2011 versus the estimated $10.4 trillion public debt we actually face in 2011. The major drivers were:
Revenue declines due to the recession, separate from the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003: 28%
Defense spending increases: 15%
Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003: 13%
Increases in net interest: 11%
Other non-defense spending: 10%
Other tax cuts: 8%
Obama Stimulus: 6%
Medicare Part D: 2%
Other reasons: 7%[33]
Posted by: davem | January 27, 2012, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Posted by: Logicsgood5
Let me give you a clue….you can’t divide just by jobs created because they spent stimulus funds on all kinds of things…just ask Republican governors like Rick Perry!
Posted by: jumbo Shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Posted by: s | January 27, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Why not when public dollars support educational institutions? That’s what I’d expect.
Posted by: Donna | January 27, 2012, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Where was all this tackling the last three years on anything…oh I know election year right??? Go back into your hole Mr. President.
Posted by: Joe Koke | January 27, 2012, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Let me give you a clue – As far as expanding the economy, the Stimulus was a failure. As far as expanding govt and our debt, it’s a keeper!
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Over 46% of Americans APPROVE of the job the President is doing. Over 3 million jobs have been added since Obama’s policies hit full stride. Oil production in the country is up. Green energy production in the country is up. GM is back at the #1 car company in the world! Bin Laden is dead. Kaddafhi is gone. Many, many al Qaeda leaders are gone. All of the world including Russia and China are onside against Iranian nuclear development. The stock market has gone up hugely since Obama’s policies began to kick in. This is a top of the line administration.
Had Bush or any Republican accomplished all of this in 3 years, the right wingers would be creaming their jeans and calling him one of the greatest presidents of all time. Trouble is – it isn’t Bush – it’s Obama – and right wingers are biased hypocrites .
Isn’t that the truth.
Posted by: Jenny | January 27, 2012, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
4yr college degree isn’t an entitlement…we wouldn’t be in this predicament if everyone didn’t feel need to get a college degree in art studies, sociology and communications. some people are destined for trades, not a useless degree.
Posted by: Rosco | January 27, 2012, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Posted by: Rosco | January 27, 2012, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
President Obama’s initiatives have also been directed specifically at increasing the number of people skilled with trades needed immediately by American industry, but with few people currently trained to take those unfilled positions. Did you miss this? It was widely reported on.
Posted by: Jake | January 27, 2012, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
As far as expanding govt and our debt, it’s a keeper!
—————————
Debt? Whats the big deal? All of the Republican proposals so far will increase the debt enormously. This insinuation that Republicans really care about debt is one of the most hilarious scams in history.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Jake – Simple minds fail to grasp that every dollar the govt puts into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new spending, no new growth, just redistribution of wealth…
But keep it up Jake – the President is counting on you and like thinkers.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
“No new spending, no new growth, just redistribution of wealth…”
Good work! If we all stick together, with dedicated effort we can all fight to keep my taxes down.
Posted by: mitt the ripper | January 27, 2012, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“Debt? Whats the big deal?” ————— And that’s what Greeks said years ago, I’m sure…
“All of the Republican proposals so far will increase the debt enormously.” ————— Personally I like the Connie Mack Penny Plan. Rep Paul Ryan and Sen Ron Paul have good ideas as well. And then there’s the President’s Committee on Deficit Reduction….. Have the Dems embraced ANY of these ideas?? Hardly.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Simple minds fail to grasp that every dollar the govt puts into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy.
——————————-
Even simple minds know that we did precisely that when we borrowed and spent our way to prosperity on an even more massive scale during WWII.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Paul Ryan’s plan will increase the debt tremendously over the next ten years, with huge tax cuts to all the usual suspects…like Mitt Romney. It’s a scam.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Logicsgood5 – Of course, we didn’t have anything near the massive entitlements we did back in the late 40′s and 50′s like we do today. Considering the insolvency of Medicare and SS, and now the addition of Obamacare, I guess that WWII comparison was pretty lame.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
They name-jack when they know they’re losing. Medicare and SS are not insolvent yet.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
The majority of the debt is traceable to the Bush catastrophe. Over $1.25 trillion of the debt on Obama’s shift is interest on the debt Bush left. Start there, turn your the functioning parts of your brain on and proceed. This isn’t ‘blaming Bush’, this is pointing out FACTS. Tax revenues stripped by the economic crash on Bush’s watch, More tax revenues stripped by the Bush tax cuts. Two wars to finance. An unpaid seniors drug program to finance. Huge demands on government resources due to the economic crash on Bush’s watch. This is not ‘blaming Bush’, this is stating simple FACTS.
Okay, time for the right wingers to lie and be hypocrites in response. One, two, three – go!
Posted by: Jake | January 27, 2012, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Unless we get a handle on the debt, it will destroy us economically. Regardless of D or R (they both got us here) the govt needs to STOP SPENDING. As soon as other countries decide to quit financing our debt, it’s over. Obama and Co simply does not care. Period.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Got it Jake – ZERO, the same as your business acumen on a scale from 1 to 10.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Oh we saw your astounding business acumen when you divided the number of jobs created by the full cost of the Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Idiotically stupid and consciously so. Not only faulty business logic – shamefully dishonest.
Posted by: Jake | January 27, 2012, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Sorry Jake – I’ve been turning a nice profit – along with my employees – for years.
Let me try for 2 out of 2 – Zero jobs created AND one of the 47%.
(And right, I need to be more honest – Like 250k to 500k jobs per month and unemployment might reach 8% without the Pork – I mean Stimulus – Bill. You bought that crap hook, line and sinker…)
LOL
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
the govt needs to STOP SPENDING
Only if we want to end up like Italy Spain and Ireland.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Drastic government spending cuts will shrink the economy, investors know this,and investors aren’t going to invest in an economy which they think is going to shrink.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Everything the government touches turns to poo, housing, investment, healthcare, education, I hate to be the bearer of bad news but those things do not exist in unlimited supplies, if they were they would cost much less than they do now. Artificial Demand no less created with inflation, is what is causing the high prices of everything.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | January 27, 2012, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Obama talked about taxing capital gains at 30%! That will absolutely kill investment and retirement accounts. Reform the tax code and get our financial house in order (this means entitlements). Those two steps alone would bring investors out of the woodwork.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Everything the government touches turns to poo
———————-
Nothing proves that wrong more dramatically than Medicare, which provides far more coverage for less cost while having less overhead and bureaucracy than any private provider ever has or ever will.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Obama talked about taxing capital gains at 30%! That will absolutely kill investment and retirement accounts.
——————————–
It never did before. The 15% rate was put in place by Bush. The Bush tax cuts have been in place for years and the only investment claims he can make evaporated with the implosion of the housing bubble.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Anyone care to guess what the next Obama campaign rhetorical talking point will be?
Posted by: newcountryman | January 27, 2012, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“When Medicare was enacted in 1965, official government projections foresaw hospital spending — the program’s largest component — reaching only $9 billion in 1990. Actual Medicare spending on hospital care in that year was $66 billion, or over seven times as high.” —– CATO Institute
Total Medicare spending in 2011 was over $550 Billion in 2011, and projected to be over $975 Billion in 2021. Unsustainable.
Posted by: Logicsgood5 | January 27, 2012, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Medicare costs need to be reigned in, but it will not save the public any money to kill the program since private insurance is just plain more expensive.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
“More students borrowing = More students in college = Higher demand = Higher tuition. Colleges get their money up front. College students are debt slaves for decades. Thanks President Obama. You contributed to the problem that you now claim you want to fix.” – Susan
Thanks for posting that little lesson in basic economics.
More proof, as if we need it, that Barry doesn’t understand what he’s doing.
Posted by: Noz | January 27, 2012, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Posted by: Noz | January 27, 2012, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
More students borrowing = More students in college = Higher demand = Higher tuition.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Wrong. That’s complete crap. The price of commercial products does not necessarily go up when demand goes up. Check out all electronics it the past decade. Check out economies of scale. Besides, education is not a for-profit commercial product and shouldn’t be. Glad to see this is going to be addressed.
Posted by: Cheers | January 27, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Gov. Rick Snyder’s approval and favorability ratings have plummeted just as with Rick Scott in FL and Dan Walker in WI. Republicans in congress in state capitols are very unpopular.
The Perkins loan portion of the president’s plan would not cost taxpayers any additional money because students pay off the aid money with interest. Leaders in higher education praised the president’s proposals. Of course, unpopular Congressional Republicans will likely continue their do-nothing, know-nothing scorched earth obstructionism.
Posted by: Kimberly | January 27, 2012, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Romney vs. the Middle Class
“Romney has repeatedly claimed that his success in the private sector has been—and would continue to be—an asset for the country, but it’s increasingly clear that Romney’s success came through questionable means at the expense of hardworking taxpayers. Laying off workers, defrauding Medicare, bankrupting companies, and storing millions of dollars in notorious off-shore tax havens may have brought Romney success as a corporate raider, but these aren’t the qualities that would serve America’s middle class families well.”
Posted by: Roxanne | January 27, 2012, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Thanks George Bush for keeping us safe and reminding us what a jaka$$ we have for a president now.
Posted by: jack | January 27, 2012, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Posted by: Cheers | January 27, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Your knowledge of economics is crap. I make a living developing econometric models. You have zero credentials.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
. I make a living developing econometric models.
Posted by: Susan | January 27, 2012, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Sure, and I’m a colonist on the moon.
Give it up.
Posted by: Roxanne | January 27, 2012, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Posted by: Roxanne | January 27, 2012, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Nah, just a taxpayer leech.
Posted by: Dane | January 27, 2012, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
our GDP growth in 2011 was half of what it was in 2010
———————————-
Well duh! The stimulus ran out in 2011. BTW this is exactly what the clueless Keynesians predicted.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Nah, just a taxpayer leech.
——————————–
It’s a safe bet that she pays a larger share of her income in all types of taxes and fees than Mitt Romney does.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
our GDP growth in 2011 was half of what it was in 2010
———————————-
Well duh! The stimulus ran out in 2011. BTW this is exactly what the clueless Keynesians predicted.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Wrong! The Commerce Department’s report on GDP says the economy grew just 1.7% last year, almost half of 2010′s 3% growth. The report falls short of the consensus forecast of USA TODAY’s panel of 48 economists, whose median prediction was for a 3.1% growth rate. The Keynesians were way off in the wrong direction. AGAIN. It wouldn’t surprise me if the 1.7% figure gets revised downward.
Posted by: Tad | January 27, 2012, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Nah, were it not for guys like Mitt Romney, she’d have no benefits at all. She’d have to get a job.
Posted by: Dane | January 27, 2012, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
The Keynesian predicted that the stimulus was too small for an economic downturn of this magnitude and would have temporary marginal benefits but by 2011 the effects would fade and the economy might slide back into a possible double-dip recession. The slowdown from 2010 to 2011 is what they predicted.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
The slowdown from 2010 to 2011 is what they predicted.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
No it isn’t. They predicted an uptick from 3% to 3.1% between 2010 and 2011.
Posted by: Tad | January 27, 2012, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
She could get a job with scrupulous businesspersons like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, instead of financial vampires like Mitt Romney
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
They predicted an uptick from 3% to 3.1% between 2010 and 2011.
Who? Provide any quote.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Taxpayer leeches don’t want jobs. They’re too lazy. Plus internet addiction isn’t a trait most employers are looking for.
Posted by: Dane | January 27, 2012, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
The report falls short of the consensus forecast of USA TODAY’s panel of 48 economists, whose median prediction was for a 3.1% growth rate. The Keynesians were way off in the wrong direction
—————————————
A median is an average! Are you claiming all of these economists at USA Today are prominent Keynesians? I bet not….
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Well, you can’t prove that she doesn’t have a job, or that you’ve ever had one…so this argument has become moot.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
She could get a job with scrupulous businesspersons like Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, instead of financial vampires like Mitt Romney
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
He does have a bit of a blood sucking look about him and he seems to lie with ease – and repeatedly – about even the smallest of things. Shifty-eyed.
Posted by: Peter | January 28, 2012, 2:11 am 2:11 am
GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is accusing rival Mitt Romney’s of being a liar.
“I think it’s the most blatantly dishonest performance by a presidential candidate I’ve ever seen,” Gingrich said in a telephone interview with the Washington Post Friday.
Posted by: Joe | January 28, 2012, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Apparently in Dane’s world, hardworking taxpayers are “leeches”. It makes no sense but at least it explains why he’s so worshipful of the guy with the Swiss tax account.
Posted by: Roxanne | January 28, 2012, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Make that Swiss tax shelter account ;^)Someone like Romney — who’s living off his investments, not the sweat of his brow — is making less of a fiscal sacrifice than many other Americans. And, puh-lease, he has never had to worry about pink slips.
Posted by: Roxanne | January 28, 2012, 10:04 am 10:04 am
A median is an average!
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Um, no it isn’t. The median is the middle number in a list of sorted numbers. The MEAN is an average. No wonder you find economics so confusing.
Posted by: Susan | January 28, 2012, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Well, you can’t prove that she doesn’t have a job, or that you’ve ever had one…so this argument has become moot.
Posted by: jumbo shrimp | January 27, 2012, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Nobody who spends over 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, tethered to a PC shilling for Obama has time for a job, let alone time for a spouse, children, siblings, parents, friends, volunteering, hobbies, or anything else that makes life fulfilling and worthwhile.
Posted by: Dane | January 28, 2012, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Romney biggest presidential candidate liar of all time.
“I think it’s the most blatantly dishonest performance by a presidential candidate I’ve ever seen,” Gingrich said to the Washington Post Friday, January 27, 2012 about the previous night’s debate.
Posted by: Shawn | January 28, 2012, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“Nobody who spends over 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, tethered to a PC …”
And you’re an expert because you spend over 16 hours a day, 7 days per week, tethered to your pc shilling for the GOP?
interesting…
Posted by: Roxanne | January 28, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
“Nobody who spends over 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, tethered to a PC …”
And you’re an expert because you spend over 16 hours a day, 7 days per week, tethered to your pc shilling for the GOP?
interesting…
Posted by: Roxanne | January 28, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
The Republican right are nothing if not hypocrites. Proven on this site over and over again.
Posted by: Bill | January 28, 2012, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Greed has run Amouck! If a public school student has to go to Summer School — it is no longer Free! and must be paid for. A college education should not cost our young people or any people an arm and a leg as education is a valuable asset if we plan to have ideas and solutions for future problems. We are not a third world country all though some would prefer it that way.
Romeny (the Super Rich & Greed) vs. the people (Pres. Obama) !
America is at a “fork in the road”! Will we continue to let greed and selfishness rule us or will we go back the principles we were founded on — that of sharing and opportunity for everyone one and just not the special few! There is nothing inherently wrong with being rich as Long as you don’t hinder others from achieving and having the same opportunities you have and/or as long as you dont hide your assets so you don’t have to pay your fair share to the common good and liftup your fellowmen.
Posted by: angellight | January 29, 2012, 6:17 am 6:17 am
Posted by: angellight | January 29, 2012, 6:17 am 6:17 am
Want to see who stopped you from being rich? Look in the mirror.
Posted by: Dr J | January 29, 2012, 8:56 am 8:56 am
“Greed has run Amouck! If a public school student has to go to Summer School — it is no longer Free! and must be paid for.”
if a student “has to go” to summer school, that means they failed a class during the year. that’s their own mistake, you stupid liberal. of course they have to pay for it.
Posted by: JRF | January 29, 2012, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm