Jan 4, 2012 10:31am

Obama to Install New Consumer Watchdog in Recess Appointment

ABC News has confirmed that President Obama will attempt to grant a recess appointment to Richard Cordray, his choice to run the new consumer Financial Protection Bureau, using powers ordinarily only available when the Senate is in recess, which it is not.

Forty-four senators object to the appointment, not over Cordray’s credentials, but over what they consider exceptional powers given to the new agency.

Cordray will travel to his home state of Ohio today with President Obama, who will make yet another high school gymnasium speech about the economy and the “We Cant Wait” campaign he is waging against Congress.

According to senior administration officials, the White House Counsel’s office has decided that “by any straight reading” of the law, the Senate has in fact been in recess since December 23, and will not return to session until January 23.  They say that remaining in “pro-forma session” with no business conducted in the interim is not sufficient to prevent a president from using his constitutional authority to place a recess appointment into office until the end of the current congressional term.

“In an overt attempt to prevent the President from exercising his authority during this period, Republican Senators insisted on using a gimmick called ‘pro forma’ sessions, which are sessions during which no Senate business is conducted and instead one or two Senators simply gavel in and out of session in a matter of seconds,” White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer writes in a White House blog. “But gimmicks do not override the President’s constitutional authority to make appointments to keep the government running.  Legal experts agree.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said the appointment is “an unprecedented move” and he complained that the president “has arrogantly circumvented the American people.”

“This recess appointment represents a sharp departure from a long-standing precedent that has limited the President to recess appointments only when the Senate is in a recess of 10 days or longer.” McConnell, R-Ky., said. “Breaking from this precedent lands this appointee in uncertain legal territory, threatens the confirmation process and fundamentally endangers the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch.”

The new consumer watchdog agency can’t employ some of its new regulatory powers until there is a chairman in place.  President Obama is testing the legality of all this, and senators fume his maneuver is  ”arrogant.”

Republicans also contend that the move “set the precedent that any time the House and Senate are not in session, the president could install his nominees — for up to two years.” Tuesday a GOP leadership aide noted that the appointment was “unprecedented without qualification.”

“Such a move would overturn more than 200 years of precedent and a core element of our constitutional system of checks and balances,” the aide said. “No president has ever done what would be required to make a recess appointment [Wednesday].”

Tuesday the House held a pro-forma session to begin the second session of the 112th Congress. According to the Constitution, the House and Senate cannot adjourn for longer than three days without the consent of the other chamber by agreeing to a concurrent adjournment resolution. In an effort to block recess appointments, both chambers have held pro-forma sessions every three days and the president has not made any recess appointments since the GOP took the House majority.

Republicans are also quick to point out that the effort to block recess appointments is not a partisan one. During the end of the George W. Bush administration, the Democratic-controlled Senate regularly held pro-forma sessions every three days during holidays to prevent the president from making recess appointments.  Then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid noted in remarks on the floor in 2008 that he had to keep the Senate in pro-forma session to block an appointment that President Bush wanted.

“Although the Senate is not in recess, President Obama, in an unprecedented move, has arrogantly circumvented the American people by ‘recess’ appointing Richard Cordray as director of the new CFPB,” House Speaker John Boehner said in a statement. “This recess appointment represents a sharp departure from a long-standing precedent that has limited the President to recess appointments only when the Senate is in a recess of 10 days or longer. Breaking from this precedent lands this appointee in uncertain legal territory, threatens the confirmation process and fundamentally endangers the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch.”

Boehner contends that the agency “is poised to be one of the least accountable and most powerful agencies in Washington.”

“Created by the deeply flawed Dodd-Frank law, it is subject to none of the checks that independent agencies normally operate under, and will have an unprecedented reach and control over individual consumer decisions,” he added.  ”Earlier this year, 44 of my Senate Republican colleagues and I served notice that we will not confirm any nominee as director, regardless of party, until structural changes are made to make the bureau accountable to the American people—and more transparent. Our request was met with silence from the administration. As a result just last month the Senate rejected Cordray’s nomination. Congress has a constitutional duty to examine presidential nominees, a responsibility that serves as a check on executive power. But once again, the President has chosen to circumvent the confirmation process.”

With reporting by ABC News’Sunlen Miller, John Parkinson and Mary Bruce.

SHOWS:

User Comments

Why do Republicans hate the idea of consumer protection from financial institutions? The politicians, I can understand. They bow to Wall Street licking their boots, and will always do whatever they can to protect these corporate and financial interests from any type of regulation or oversight or culpability for their wrong-doings. But why do the rank and file Republicans oppose it? This agency was created because Wall Street has proven time and time again that they will screw Grandma out of her last nickel given the chance. So why don’t ordinary, average Republicans want to do anything about this? I do not understand their opposition here.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Well Cynic, if you read the article—it said that the republicans are against Obama’s expanse of government power. governments and in particular Obama’s government, keeps proving itself abusive and although they say they are doing somthing to help the people, it is often nothing more than a lie to cover up some sort of power grab/money grab of theirs. Remember Obama is goldman Sachs boys and the housing bubble couldn’t have happened with out the careful help of dems Dodd and Frank and the ever corrupt Freddie and Fannie that Obama supports.

Posted by: saidsaid | January 4, 2012, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Barack needs to get Holder to read the Constittution, not that he cares. Law suit coming. More tax money wasted.

Posted by: ray | January 4, 2012, 10:53 am 10:53 am

ABC News: “Obama to Install New Consumer Watchdog in Recess Appointment”

The most transparent administration ever . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 10:55 am 10:55 am

MF Global sells assets to Obama friends and contributors at Goldman Sacs right before MF GLobal Collaspes…..Another Obama Scandal brewing?

Solyndra, Lightsquared, Fast&Furious.. The scandal list grows… ABC takes the SGT Shultz apporach…Nothing…. we know nothing

OBAMA________VS________AMERICA

Posted by: Yep I said that | January 4, 2012, 11:02 am 11:02 am

A CYNIC: “Why do Republicans hate the idea of consumer protection from financial institutions?”

They don’t. They hate the idea of bureaucrats and politicians subverting free people and their free market under the banner of consumer protection.

Republicans have even proposed replacing the singular director position with a board that could more evenly decide matters before the bureau. Obama insists on that power being consolidated. Big surprise.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 11:02 am 11:02 am

They don’t. They hate the idea of bureaucrats and politicians subverting free people and their free market… Anonymous…What makes you think we have free markets? Gains are private but losses are socialized. Look at MF Global for that & Yep I said that. MF Global was not a Obama scandal but a Market scandal. The Koch brothers got a 1st call to get their money out a few days before this went down. Which would mean this crosses the Rep/Dem line or better put the 1% looks out for each other. When it comes to light that no laws were broken in the MF Global meltdown will you change your tune? This is the Self Regulation Rep’s defend. Look up HYPOTHECATION & REHYPOTHECATION. That board that Reb’s proposed would be a dog & pony show that would only add red tape.

Posted by: WhosVoice | January 4, 2012, 11:30 am 11:30 am

If Obama is so concerned over the influenece of Wall Street – then he would not accept their campiagn money – right? Oh – just another LIMo liberal hypocrit

Posted by: jamescbuilder | January 4, 2012, 11:32 am 11:32 am

I don’t know why you get so upset over this, he will and has done exactly what he sayed he will do, transform AMERICA?

Posted by: Lizzie | January 4, 2012, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Posted by: A Cynic—Because it isn’t the governments job to take care of you. It is up to you to take care of you and yours.

Posted by: snewsom2997 | January 4, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

If they don’t like the consumer protection; change the law duly passed by congress. don’t play hide and seek repubs. Way to go obama. If wall street and their minions don’t like it, it must be good. Somebody has to fight for the little guy. Thank you Democrats.

Posted by: dabu | January 4, 2012, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Snewsom2997;
Yes it is the govt’s job to protect me from crooks. I am not sure you have read the constitution but ensuring the welfare of the people is the sole purpose of the govt. of course, the crooks don’t like the idea of someone protecting the people from them! I don’t expect mobsters to like law enforcement.

Posted by: dabu | January 4, 2012, 11:46 am 11:46 am

WHOSVOICE: “What makes you think we have free markets?”

That’s true. Our markets aren’t as free as they once were or as free as they should be — and we pay the price for that everyday. That’s why the power to restrict our free market shouldn’t be taken lightly. Obama wants that power consolidated to a single person, while Republicans favor dispersing the power to a board.

Here, I thought liberals disliked the consolidation of power. That’s right, government is the exception. Somehow government is magically immune from mistake and corruption.

WHOSVOICE: “Gains are private but losses are socialized.”

In a free market, gains and losses are private. Losses are only socialized with s.o.c.i.a.l.i.s.m. That’s why it fails over and over again.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 11:56 am 11:56 am

DABU: “Yes it is the govt’s job to protect me from crooks.”

Your mistake is assuming the crooks can’t inhabit government. Who watches the watchers?

That’s why it’s important that government not manipulate the people’s market and involve themselves only to make the market free and safe. A single person with such vast powers over the people’s market doesn’t strike such confidence — all under the banner of consumer protection. It’s classic Democrat politics.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Just what we need, another department of government to fund, make more rules and regulations to kill jobs.

Posted by: Freedom | January 4, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

….when will whatever we have left of the “free press” wise up????? This potentate is either on vacation or campaigning…….when what we need is a President……..Iran?..oh, is something happening in Iran?…………Holder?…is he in trouble? why? ….Solyndra?……how do you spell that?…sorry, gotta get to Cleveland for a speech today………..on the internet last night, you know….gotta stay on the campaign…………..yeah, it’s all congress’ fault…..right!!!!

Posted by: justj joey | January 4, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

“A single person with such vast powers over the people’s market doesn’t strike such confidence”

I know I’ve been conspicuously absent, even in Europe where they imposed austerity, but give big business everything it wants and I guarantee I will return triumphantly!

Posted by: confidence fairy | January 4, 2012, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

For those who want to know…this process and right given to the president by the co stitution has been used throughout history . It was used over one hundred times by our most recent former president. If you disagree with the right given. By the constitution, then make that argument. Please just don’t say the curre t president is somehow “taking over” with “unpresidented” moves. It is not factual or historically acurarate.

Posted by: Concerned | January 4, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

In a free market, gains and losses are private
————————————————–

Yeah right…..much of the losses from the last financial crisis and previous ones have fallen on the public. The Republicans have not demonstrated any willingness to change that.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Another irresponsible, unconstitutional act by the DICTATOR-in-Chief.

Posted by: TeaPartyNation | January 4, 2012, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

aside to CONCERNED……….better read that section in our Constitution again, because I can’t find your source. Regardless of that, I think that you will find that our Potentate simplly has warped the process used over and over and over again by prior Presidents………let’s use facts, man/

Posted by: justj joey | January 4, 2012, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

aside to CONCERNED……….better read that section in our Constitution again, because I can’t find your source. Posted by: justj joey | January 4, 2012, 12:45 pm

US Constitution, Article 2, Section 2: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. — President George W. Bush appointed two judges during Senate recesses, William Pryor and Charles Pickering, to U.S. courts of appeals after their nominations were filibustered by Senate Democrats. Judge Pickering, whom Bush appointed to the Fifth Circuit, withdrew his name from consideration for renomination and retired when his recess appointment expired. Judge Pryor was subsequently confirmed by the Senate for a lifetime appointment to the Eleventh Circuit. In two terms, Bush made 171 recess appointments. — Just using facts, Joey.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “. . . much of the losses from the last financial crisis and previous ones have fallen on the public.”

The financial crisis fell on those who over-leveraged themselves — whether that be in the stock market, their home, their career, or their life in general. It’s not government’s job to hold your hand and protect you from yourself. When government does that, we all lose, as in the financial crisis that got us here.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

This department and office were duly and legally created by the US Congress, and signed into law by the president. The fact that the Republicans refuse to allow the president to select someone to run the office, thereby effectively negating the agency that was legally created, smacks of pure treason. If the Republicans do not want a consumer financial protection agency, then they need to enact legislation to eliminate it. Once again, Republicans play fast and loose with the rules when it suits their corporate masters agenda.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 4, 2012, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

That’s what dictators do…..they circumvent the process…….and we have a dictator in the WH.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 4, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said the appointment is “an unprecedented move” and he complained that the president “has arrogantly circumvented the American people.”

Baloney. It is this Republican controlled Congress which has, for months now, arrogantly circumvented the will of the people and the LAW by refusing to appoint ANY head to this agency and so prevent it from beginning operation…the legislation which created this agency was PASSED and SIGNED into LAW and yet this Congress is circumventing that law with obstinate obstruction and gimmicks.

Read the legislation. It provides common-sense PROTECTIONS for consumers and places very reasonable regulations on industries which regularly exploit consumers.

THAT is the ONLY reason the Right opposes it; it is an effective tool for reigning in abuses in the credit card, banking, loan, and other sectors which for too long have been free from oversight and allowed to run roughshod over the American consumer.

They oppose it because they are representing their true constituency (big business and the wealthiest few). Simple.

This agency is actually very clearly limited in its scope and power (even its FUNDING is limited by law to a capped percentage of the budget).

Posted by: Raven | January 4, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

A CYNIC: “This department and office were duly and legally created by the US Congress, and signed into law by the president.”

Republicans are just exercising their duly and legally protected right to deny confirmation. Obama, on the other hand, has no legal right to appoint the director without Congressional approval, unless they are out of session, which they are not. The most transparent administration ever . . .

Maybe Obama should have went with a board of directors, like other similar government agencies, rather than consolidate power to a single person. That doesn’t protect consumers as much as it protects government and political interests, which of course is the whole point.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

this is not a recess.

Posted by: not a recess | January 4, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Obama isn’t a dictator. He made a recess appointment because the Republicans refuse up or down votes on his appointees, they use Constitutional loopholes to shut down the government. The recess appointment is an entirely precedented workaround for this congressional overreach. I’m sick of this hyperbole.

You might not like it… but no need to scream that the sky is falling. Bush did it and you didn’t care. Now Obama’s doing it and you say it’s the end of America. Just quit it already. Why not celebrate YOUR candidate for a while instead of trashing OUR President 24 hours a day. Can’t you find something nice to say about Romney instead of drowning us in histrionics?

Posted by: blip | January 4, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Those republicians are just protecting the wealthy as usual, like Nancy Pelosi, Charlie Rangel, Obama, Michael Moore, Diane Sawyer, Katie couric…they always protect the super rich

Posted by: Them darned Republicians | January 4, 2012, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

It’s not government’s job to hold your hand and protect you from yourself. When government does that, we all lose, as in the financial crisis that got us here
———————————————————–

But that’s not what got us here…at all. It comes from the nonsensical notion that when the Republicans had control they didn’t deregulate the housing and financial markets or that Barney Frank was really running things.- Nobody buys it except those on the fringe. The Republicans deregulated the markets. rating agencies gave great ratings to financial products based on risky mortgages. mortgage houses pushed those risky mortgages on customers proclaiming them safe. investment banks leveraged huge amounts on them, derivative giants like AIG couldn’t cover all the credit default swaps hedged against these faulty financial products when prices started to fall……..all free market failures brought to you by Republican hands-off government……and the public still bears the costs. Now they want us to pretend it never happened and try it all again.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

“Republicans are just exercising their duly and legally protected right to deny confirmation. Obama, on the other hand, has no legal right to appoint the director without Congressional approval, unless they are out of session, which they are not. The most transparent administration ever . . .”

NO. The Republicans in Congress have no right to DENY confirmation, PERIOD, which is what they have been doing for months now. They have a right to challenge and/or deny the confirmation of a PARTICULAR person or persons…not every single candidate who is put forth for confirmation because they are attempting to block a LAW which was passed by Congress and signed by the President from going into effect.

And YES, they ARE on recess; having one member show up and bang the gavel now and then while the rest of the Congress is on VACATION is not “in session” but “on recess”. Just because the Democrats in Congress may have used the same gimmic/ploy at one time or another does NOT make it right OR a viable way to avoid recess appointments.

I suspect that as a Constitutional scholar, President Obama knows a bit more about the complexities of the law than this current crop of tea Partiers who had to hold CLASSES on the basics of the Constitution shortly after taking office, they knew so little.

Posted by: Raven | January 4, 2012, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

raven…what proof do you have that obama is a constitutionall scholar? have you seen his grades? just sayin?i havent and nor has anyone else. we knew bushs and kerrys grades and niether of those two would be considered a scholar.look at our department of justice which is becoming embroiled in scandal. at some point in time rules are more important than the democrat party,so far i havent seen anything very scholarly of this administration.

Posted by: catman | January 4, 2012, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Posted by: dabu—You do not have a right to individual military or police protection, and we never have had that right. We only have the right to collective military and police protection, which means they might help you if they are around and not currently busy.

Posted by: snewsom2997 | January 4, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

It turns out that the action not only contradicts long-standing practice, but also the view of the administration itself. In 2010, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal explained to the Supreme Court the Obama administration’s view that recess appointments are only permissible when Congress is in recess for more than three days.

ABC in full protection mode..Solyndra, lightsquared, MF global fast and furious scandals

Posted by: Impeach his butt | January 4, 2012, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Posted by: Impeach his butt | January 4, 2012, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Yes, but the Republicans aren’t really in session; they’re only faking being in session. Read the article.

Posted by: Gerry | January 4, 2012, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“by any straight reading” of the law, the Senate has in fact been in recess since December 23, and will not return to session until January 23. Yep, the Republicans are trying to stop him from doing anything with filibusters and”pro forma” sessions. Glad he i finally seeing through their tricks and turning the tables on them. That the Republicans are against this appointment and the agency because they feel it has too much power is a joke. There i finally an agency whose job is to protect the PEOPLE from the Banks and Wall Street Brokers. I love how Republicans scream when Obama does something that Bush did during his 8 years without a whimper.

Posted by: pksk531 | January 4, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “The Republicans deregulated the markets.”

So did Democrats. Regardless, the markets were never deregulated or even close to it. Further, it was government’s heavy hand in the market that brought about the risk you liberals claim they are supposed to protect us from. You can’t have it both ways.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “rating agencies gave great ratings . . .”

. . . which highlights the virtue of thinking for one’s self.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “. . . mortgage houses pushed those risky mortgages on customers proclaiming them safe.”

At gun point, was it? More excuses.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “. . . all free market failures . . .”

You could only call it a free market had the government not been so heavily involved. They owned at least half of the mortgage market and were over-leveraged more than the investment banks (100-to-1 vs 30-to-1). Nice try at scape-goating your government failure on the free market. Just more classic Democrat politics.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “Now they want us to pretend it never happened and try it all again.”

Freedom is here to stay. What you want to try again is more government central planning, which fails every time it’s tried. You don’t have that problem with free people and truly free markets. That’s why America is the success it is and those that rely on central planning are not.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

RAVEN: “They have a right to challenge and/or deny the confirmation of a PARTICULAR person or persons…not every single candidate who is put forth . . .”

Cordray was the only candidate put forth. You can consider him denied.

RAVEN: “. . . for confirmation because they are attempting to block a LAW which was passed by Congress and signed by the President from going into effect.”

Maybe Obama should have more carefully crafted his law. Republicans are just exercising their right to deny confirmation of Cordray. Maybe Obama should have considered a board of directors rather than a director where nearly all power of the bureau is reliant and concentrated. That would be better for consumers anyway, don’t you think?

RAVEN: “And YES, they ARE on recess; having one member show up and bang the gavel now and then . . .”

. . . proves they are indeed in session. Too bad you and Obama don’t like it.

RAVEN: “I suspect that as a Constitutional scholar, President Obama knows a bit more about the complexities . . .”

Please . . . too funny!

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

mortgage houses pushed those risky mortgages on customers proclaiming them safe.”

At gun point, was it? More excuses
——————————————————-

go ahead–just keep telling Americans who are underwater on their mortgages that it’s all their fault….that’s going to work just great for you this election.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

“rating agencies gave great ratings . . .”

. . . which highlights the virtue of thinking for one’s self.
———————————

great…so you freely admit we can safely disregard the S&P downgrade….

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “go ahead–just keep telling Americans who are underwater on their mortgages that it’s all their fault….that’s going to work just great for you this election.”

First you blame the free market, now you blame the people. Like I said, aside from those who over-leveraged themselves, it was government manipulation of the people’s market that got us here, not the people. You aren’t fooling anyone.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “great…so you freely admit we can safely disregard the S&P downgrade….”

There you go not thinking for yourself again. What part of unsustainable debt do you liberals not understand.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

I told you he’d do this! I can read Obama like a book.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

First you blame the free market, now you blame the people
————————————–

reading comprehension problem? I never blamed the people, you did I plainly stated that they were coerced by unscrupulous businesses courtesy of the unregulated free market. let’s ask the people with underwater mortgages what they think.

Posted by: smooking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

I KNEW IT! And said so right here. Obama continues to push the envelope. He cares not about building concensus, but only getting his way and political Chicago stlyed political payback. Wake up people.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

So we can disregard rating agencies when they give faulty financial products great ratings but pay attention when they tell us our debt is risky even though investors unanimously look the other way. I’m afraid it you who wants it both ways as usual.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

I predicted this over a month ago when the House rejected Obama’s nomination of Richard Cordray.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “I plainly stated that they were coerced by unscrupulous businesses courtesy of the unregulated free market. let’s ask the people with underwater mortgages what they think.”

Unless they were threatened, the people who took on loans they couldn’t afford, did so at their own risk. To blame the free market is unscrupulous scape-goating — now that you mention those who lack scruples.

Those with underwater mortgages can blame the government for unnecessarily manipulating the market.

Let’s see if you can keep it all straight.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

The NLRB resess appointments are next….mark my words!

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “So we can disregard rating agencies when . . .”

. . . they make recommendations that don’t make sense to you. The only person responsible for you is you, not government and not rating agencies.

The recommendation that the US government reduce it’s debt makes perfect sense. Our current debt is now 100% GDP. How much higher does it need to be for you liberals to get the message? Thankfully, soon it won’t matter . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

So wonderful – another “CZAR” in charge of another “Bureau.” That will create a lot of new jobs – way to go Pres.

Posted by: Manitu | January 4, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

The gop is not saying they don’t like the man, they are saying they don’t like the whole idea of a committee that is about as transparent as this administration. Obama is a perfect example of that. Remember how he said his administration full of idiots I might add, would be transparent?Well that never happened. Remember all the closed door meetings, voting after mid night on a sunday morning,the dirty deals and bribes, example cornhusker deal. And the bill he signed New Years eve at 6:30 pm he hoped nobody would notice. Those close door meetings with insurance companies during the Obamacare days he will not release the transcripts on.That is the reason for checks and balances.

Posted by: specialty57 | January 4, 2012, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Is Barry trying to slip one in again? That boy is slicker than Willy, even on his worse day!

Posted by: Gunner_1959 | January 4, 2012, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Those with underwater mortgages can blame the government for unnecessarily manipulating the market.
—————————————-

Yes… they can blame he Republican controlled government 2000-2007for unnecessarily deregulating the housing and financial markets And please keep spamming that stuff about how people with underwater mortgages should have known better than to try and buy a house they couldn’t afford while their realtor was telling them that they definitely could afford it. It’s rich.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Our current debt is now 100% GDP. How much higher does it need to be for you liberals to get the message?
—————————————————-

Debt is not our biggest problem now, high unemployment and lack of economic growth is. How long will it take the GOP to get the message?

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

GOP message on the housing crash: “it’s all your fault, and the government’s….even though we were running the government, at least as much as Barney Frank would let us”.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “And please keep spamming that stuff about how people with underwater mortgages should have known better than to try and buy a house they couldn’t afford while their realtor was telling them that they definitely could afford it.”

I knew you couldn’t keep it straight. The underwater mortgages were caused by government’s manipulation of the mortgage market — too much easy credit resulting in too many houses. The people who defaulted on their loans did so at their own peril. No one forced them to take on loans they couldn’t afford. The only person responsible for you is you, not government, not rating agencies, and not realtors.

You excuse the irresponsible, while ignoring the majority of responsible Americans who didn’t abandon their obligation. It’s obvious what category you fall into. Liberals . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “Debt is not our biggest problem now, high unemployment and lack of economic growth is.”

We’re talking the credit rating of the US government, which was rightfully downgraded due to too much debt. Try to keep it straight.

Although, we would have less unemployment if the government could find it in themselves to allow the people to grow their own economy with the fruits of their own labor. It works much better that way.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

I love it. The president is making appointments to thwart the Republican attempt to strip power from the NLRB and the Consumer Financial Protection Board. Good for you, Obama. Republicans hate anything that benefits the middle class, labor and consumers.

Posted by: progressivemama | January 4, 2012, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Smoking CURES, talking about rich, look up whose name is signed on deregulation. Hint, he said it was his biggest mistake other than Monica. Just like smoking cures cancer, Obama cures high unemployment and economic problems.

Posted by: specialty57 | January 4, 2012, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

The silence from Harry Reid IS THE STORY.He knows this violates agreements reached on recess appointments THAT WERE MADE WITH THIS WHITE HOUSE.Obama is not a constitutional scholar-if he was he never would have picked this fight.He looked awful in his talk with the Democrat caucus last PM-we need a medical release on his condition .Does he have an occult malignancy?

Posted by: Nephron | January 4, 2012, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

Obam thinks he has to stick his nose into everything people do for their own protection. Thanks Obam, but I will pass. I have seen how your policies work. Record fuel prices, record unemployment, record food prices, record commodity prices, and a record number of people in poverty. All of this in just three yrs. Great job.

Posted by: specialty57 | January 4, 2012, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Boehner and McConnell are total tools. Republican hero Ronald Reagan made 240-yes, 240-recess appointments. George H.W. Bush made 77. George W. Bush made 171. Obama has made approx. 28 despite unprecedented bipartisanship on the part of fruitcake Republicans.

Posted by: Corrine | January 4, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Obama nominates Richard Cordray to serve as the first director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. However… In 2008 candidate Sen. Barack Obama famously said: “This is part of the whole theory of George Bush that he can make laws as he is going along… We are not going to use signing statements as a way of doing and end run around Congress.” —– Now, we find out he just said that to get elected!! —- He recently used a signing statement to ignore about 20 provisions of the omnibus spending bill!!!! —- An NOW Obama also believes he can decide for himself that the Senate is in recess when it is not… overturning at least a hundred years of precedent, and bypass the Constitution’s advice and consent requirement!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | January 4, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

smoking cures cancer 4:14 pm ——- You said “blame he Republican controlled government 2000-2007for unnecessarily deregulating the housing and financial markets” —– Hmmm…. first Dems pushed to lower all kinds of standards on approving morgages…. then the Dem-controlled Fannie-Freddie purchased more and more bundled products knowing they were overvalued (of course the Dems like Raines and Franklin made millions in bonuses)! — Then the GOP House members tried to reign in Fannie-Freddie in 2004, House Democrats sent to then-President Bush a letter asking the Republicans to “back off”!!! —- The SIGNERS complained that the administration had taken a hard line with GSEs by insisting on emphasizing fiscal prudence and responsible lending over increased affordable housing access.) The relevant section: “We have been concerned that the Administration’s legislative proposal regarding the GSEs would weaken affordable housing performance by the GSEs, by emphasizing only safety and soundness. While the GSEs’ affordable housing mission is not in any way incompatible with their safety and soundness, an exclusive focus on safety and soundness is likely to come, in practice, at the expense of affordable housing.” —– Signers include Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Charlie Rangel, Patrick Kennedy, Jim McDermott!!!! —– THEN Fannie-Freddie bought even MORE distressed mortgage paper so now they own 90% of all mortgages… and we are paying them BILLIONS a year to stay afloat!!! —– Isn’t that a coincidence!! — Big gov Democrats pushing to increase the share of government in our lives!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | January 4, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

PROGRESSIVEMAMA: “Republicans hate anything that benefits the middle class, labor and consumers.”

No, we just hate unnecessary and harmful interference into the free market — especially when such power to do so is concentrated into a single position. You should ask yourself why Obama favored a single director rather than a board of directors before patting him on the back for protecting consumers. Obama wouldn’t go against consumers would he? Naw . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

hey folks..it’s as straight as this: the Republicans were firmly in control in Washington when the housing bubble mushroomed. They deregulated the housing and financial markets. Trying to blame it on Democrats or governmental over burden, and explain it by bogus ideology is just a scam and a total cop-out. Poll after poll shows Americans don’t buy the Republicans’ excuses.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

WHOSVOICE: “The government does not set mortgage rates.”

I never said they did. I said they influenced the housing market by owning at least half of it and being responsible for the easy credit that caused too many houses to be on the market, which resulted in the bottoming out of the market. Just another lesson that the market isn’t something that can be accurately or safely managed by government.

WHOSVOICE: “Mortgage companies were putting people in bad loans even when they qulified for good ones.”

You mean, they put themselves in bad loans. No one forced them. Stop acting as if they were forced at gun point. Only the gullible buy that stuff.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Just another lesson that the market isn’t something that can be accurately or safely managed by government.
—————————————————

But the really funny part is the insinuation that the Republicans who were in control of government at the time were trying to manage free markets….they weren’t. They were deregulating them

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Stop acting as if they were forced at gun point
==============================

Strawman. They weren’t forced, they were mislead and lied to by unscrupulous businesses when such business practices should have been regulated.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “All the Americans who are underwater on their mortgages are not irresponsible.”

This is at least the third time I’ve said this: the underwater mortgages were caused by government’s manipulation of the mortgage market — too much easy credit resulting in too many houses.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “If it wasn’t the fault of the free markets and was the fault of the government . . .”

See, I knew you understood. Who’s distorting again? Seriously, who do you think you are fooling? It’s just pathetic.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “. . . the Republicans were in charge . . .”

Yes, moderate Republicans were in favor of this disastrous meddling in the market. That’s why both Democrats and Republicans are to blame. It was a government problem, not just one party or another. Although, Republicans were on the right track in their desire to reform Freddie and Fannie — the Democrat sacred cows instrumental in the crisis.

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “But that’s why passing the buck on the financial crash . . .”

Speak for yourself.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “Strawman. They weren’t forced, they were mislead and lied to . . .”

It wasn’t I who said they were ‘put into bad loans.’ That’s the real straw-man. I just pointed out the hypocrisy of it. Seems you agree.

If they couldn’t read or understand the contract or hire someone that could, they shouldn’t have signed it. Again, excuses for the irresponsible.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

If they couldn’t read or understand the contract or hire someone that could, they shouldn’t have signed it
——————————————–

This has nothing to do with the legality of these contracts. [more obfuscation as usual]. It was the deceptive sale of them that was the problem. It’s about taking advantage of customers with false claims for faulty products….all quite legitimate to pure free market fans apparently.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

This is at least the third time I’ve said this: the underwater mortgages were caused by government’s manipulation of the mortgage market
——————————————————————————–

and this is the third time I’ve said that that manipulation by the Republicans in charge at the time took the form of deregulation of those markets…not tighter management.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “This has nothing to do with the legality of these contracts. . . . It was the deceptive sale of them that was the problem. It’s about taking advantage of customers with false claims for faulty products . . .”

Like I said, they didn’t read the contract. If the bank didn’t live up to the contract, they could be sued. Again, excuses for the irresponsible. And, you are the only one attempting and failing to obfuscate. Par for the course.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “and this is the third time I’ve said that that manipulation by the Republicans . . .”

No, you were attempting to act as if those with underwater loans were tricked by the bank, when we both know an underwater loan is caused by the price of the home decreasing from that at which it was purchased, not ‘unscrupolous bankers.’ And, home prices decreased due to government (both Democrats and Republicans) manipulation of the market, period.

Does this ring a bell?

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “All the Americans who are underwater on their mortgages are not irresponsible.”

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“when we both know an underwater loan is caused by the price of the home decreasing from that at which it was purchased, not ‘unscrupolous bankers.’ ”

Thanks for your continuing support1

Posted by: Wall street | January 4, 2012, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

And, home prices decreased due to government (both Democrats and Republicans) manipulation of the market, period
—————————————–

Meddling, manipulation, tampering, managing…….why not cut the baloney and just say the real word:

Deregulation. They deregulated the markets.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

How did Wall Street manipulate the prices of homes downward and why would they want to if they could? That would just make them and their investments worth less. Just another half-baked senseless liberal conspiracy theory . . .

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

SMOKING CURES CANCER: “Meddling, manipulation, tampering, managing…….why not cut the baloney and just say the real word: Deregulation. They deregulated the markets.”

Because deregulation alone doesn’t cause a market bubble. Even you should know that. On the other hand, government creating an environment of easy credit and then feeding that market by purchasing up to half of it sure does. That’s all the things I said it was. Deregulation? Nope.

Posted by: Anonymous | January 4, 2012, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Good work, It’s best if people don’t realize that many times we make money either way, and that they don’t notice how fast we recover while they ….don’t unfortunately.

Posted by: wall Street | January 4, 2012, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

SEC. 1066. INTERIM AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY.
(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized to perform the functions of the Bureau under this subtitle until the Director of the Bureau is confirmed by the Senate in accordance with section 1011.
.
So which one of you little perfumed press poodles is going to read oBama and Hairy Reid the relevant part of their little statute here and how Cordray is going to “perform the functions of the Bureau” when he has not been confirmed by the Senate.

Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | January 4, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Deregulation? Nope.
——————————————

Well of course not, because in order to pass the buck for the financial crash Republican apologists and free market fanatics have to deny deregulation of the housing and financial markets by the Republicans ever happened or at least try and downplay its effects dramatically….but it did happen and the negative effects are well documented.

Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 4, 2012, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

So which Republican deregulation let Corzine and MF Global run off with $1.2 BILLION of middle-class Americans money? How would Cordray have prevented that?

Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | January 4, 2012, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Obama has to appoint a lot more to catch up with Republicans. GHW Bush was only in one term and had appointed 2.5 times more. Reagan appointed 9X more in his eight years.

Mitt sure landed with a thud in NH. Repubes have become UNHINGED!!! That’s why. They can’t stand the horrible candidates they have to run against Obama.

ROFL!!! LMAO!!!!

Posted by: youLulu | January 4, 2012, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Like much of what happens in Washington, the sessions are make-believe events in which the Senate is gaveled into business but conducts no real work. Senate Democrats during the second term of President George W. Bush were especially adept with this stratagem.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 5, 2012, 6:38 am 6:38 am

ABC, why do you delete the truth?

Washington Times reports:
“The three-day rule was also the precedent Mr. Obama and his fellow Senate Democrats followed in 2007 and 2008 when they were trying to block then-President George W. Bush from making recess appointments.

“I am keeping the Senate in pro forma to prevent recess appointments until we get this process back on track,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said on Nov. 16, 2007, as he announced his strategy of having the Senate convene twice a week for pro forma sessions.

On Wednesday, though, Mr. Reid reversed course and said he backed the president’s move.

“I support President Obama’s decision to make sure that in these tough economic times, middle-class families in Nevada and across the country will have the advocate they deserve to fight on their behalf against the reckless practices that denied so many their economic security,” he said.”

Rules are only to be followed by the Republicans. The Dems do whatever the heck they want.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | January 5, 2012, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Come on ABC.. WAKE UP!!!! What I want to hear from ABC news is the truth, not your version of kissing OBAMA’S ass to make him look good, when we all know that is a complete lie. You spend days on expert this and expert that interviews for every rediculous story/non issue- such as who had an affair with whom, and yet, you fail so miserably at telling the real truth about this man who calls himself president. Your reporting is designed to make him look good every time. And when the heat is on, you will throw the truth a bone, but then right back to the ass kissing of Obama. Why??? How much are you getting paid to paint the pretty picture for the nieve believing Americans? You might actually get some steam built up if you told the truth. There is no recess… Why aren’t you reporting that and the evident manipulation that is going on….

Posted by: jboehrig | January 5, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Da mn near a virtual news black-out on anything that might negatively affect obama. But even the blackout cannot hide the diastrous effects obama’s policies and dictates are having on the American people. They know the buck stops with mr. orange-glo and will vote accordingly. No pun intended.

One and Done!

ABO 2012

Posted by: ceeLeelee | January 5, 2012, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.