R.I.P., Department of Commerce? President Obama Seeks to Consolidate Government Agencies
The Department of Commerce will celebrate its 109th anniversary this year, having been created in 1903. And if President Obama gets his way, the agency won’t make it much past 110.
Announcing this morning that he is seeking authority to streamline the executive branch, President Obama said he needs the same kind of “authority that every business owner has to make sure that his or her company keeps pace with the times. And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service, and a leaner government.”
As an example, the president wants to shut down the Department of Commerce, taking its core functions and giving them to a new agency that will also fold in the tasks of the Small Business Administration, the U.S. Trade Representative, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Trade and Development Agency and the Export-Import Bank.
The savings the administration claims will come from this move is roughly 1/400th of the $1.2 trillion increase in the debt limit that the president formally informed Congress yesterday that he was seeking.
“Right now, there are six departments and agencies focused primarily on business and trade in the federal government,” the president said. “Six. In this case, six isn’t better than one. It’s redundant and inefficient. With the authority I am requesting today, we could consolidate them all into one department with one website, one phone number and one mission – helping American businesses succeed.”
The president added: “This is a big idea. ”
This new agency would be smaller than the sum of its previous parts by up to two thousand employees (which will be lost through attrition, the White House says), and saving $3 billion over the next decade, said Jeffrey Zients, head of management at the Office of Management and Budget.
“We live in a 21st century economy, but we’ve still got a government organized for the 20th century,” President Obama said this morning. “Our economy has fundamentally changed – as has the world – but the government has not. The needs of our citizens have fundamentally changed but their government has not. Instead, it has often grown more complex.”
The president noted that there are “five different entities dealing with housing; more than a dozen agencies involved in food safety. And my favorite example, which I mentioned in last year’s State of the Union Address. As it turns out, the Interior Department is in charge of salmon in fresh water, but the Commerce Department handles them in saltwater. Apparently, this all had something to do with President Nixon being unhappy with his Interior Secretary for criticizing the Vietnam War, and so he decided not to put NOAA in what would have been a more sensible place.”
The president is as of today elevating SBA Administrator Karen Mills to a cabinet-level position. However, her position would essentially disappear if Obama’s proposal is enacted as the SBA would be represented in the new Department.
The weather service provided by NOAA and housed in Commerce will become part of the Department of the Interior.
The Census Bureau, also part of Commerce, will combine with the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the National Science Foundation’s National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics and be housed in this new Cabinet-level agency.
“Given the President’s record of growing government, we’re interested to learn whether this proposal represents actual relief for American businesses or just the appearance of it,” said a skeptical Brendan Buck, a spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio. “American small businesses are more concerned about this administration’s policies than from which building in Washington they originate. We hope the President isn’t simply proposing new packaging for the same burdensome approach. However, eliminating duplicative programs and making the federal government more simple, streamlined, and business-friendly is always an idea worth exploring. We look forward to hearing more about his proposal.”
Don Stewart, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said “Americans want a government that’s simpler, streamlined, and secure. So after presiding over one of the largest expansions of government in history, and a year after raising the issue in his last State of the Union, it’s interesting to see the President finally acknowledge that Washington is out of control. And while we first learned of this proposal this morning in the press, we’ll be sure to give it a careful review once the White House provides us with the details of what it is he wants to do.”
The move might help GOP presidential candidate Governor Rick Perry, who has called for the elimination of three agencies – Commerce, Education, and Energy – but has seemed to struggle with remembering more than two of them.
-Jake Tapper
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
I’ll believe it when I see it. He’s campaigning.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Hmmm. Makes sense. So naturally Republicans will whine, and attempt to stop it.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 13, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
“Given the President’s record of growing government…” and “So after presiding over one of the largest expansions of government in history…” are the initial responses from the Republican “leaders” in Congress. Of course, they ignore the fact that the federal government has less employees today than when Obama took office. They also ignore the fact that GW increased the size, scope, reach, invasiveness and cost of the government more than any modern president including Obama, through the creation of the Homeland Security department and the passage of the Patriot Act.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 13, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Great idea. But not the Tea Party’s or the GOP’s idea, so it stinks. Running against Congress is easy when Congress makes it easy to run against Congress.
Posted by: sameagain | January 13, 2012, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
The Republicans will block this……
Posted by: Steve | January 13, 2012, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Just shifting folks from one place to another…. and the net new headcount in DC is approx 40K (read the census, and the pop counts by housing).
Posted by: mrl | January 13, 2012, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Ironic that while the GOP fights with itself about eliminating jobs, Obama comes out with a plan for eliminating jobs (and making life easier for Rick Perry!). It’s beginning to look some kind of a parallel universe these days. Anyone for raising taxes on millionaires? Grover? Newt? Anybody?
Posted by: sameagain | January 13, 2012, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
The President wants to “fire” the redundant and inefficient government employees! Someone should ask him if he enjoys doing this?
Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 13, 2012, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I do not trust Obama to “reform” anything.
Posted by: Zexufang | January 13, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
They also ignore the fact that GW increased the size, scope, reach, invasiveness and cost of the government more than any modern president including Obama, through the creation of the Homeland Security department and the passage of the Patriot Act.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 13, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Republican presidents grow government. It’s a fact.
Meanwhile, Mark Levin wants to know who Mitt Romney is after viewing a videotape (available at Real Clear Politics) in which Romney says, “”There are some, if you will, classical Republicans, and I don’t want to be political here. The classical Republican approach is to say you know what makes America so great is our great corporations. And if we just clear the decks so that corporations can be more successful and give them more money, and make it easier for them to succeed. Well, then we will do even better on the world stage. I don’t happen to subscribe to that traditional Republican caricature.”
Do the Republicans defending his vulture capitalism subscribe to that view? I think the RP Pac’s parody of Mitt is right. It’s hard to tell the diff between the fake Mitt and the real fake Mitt.
“I mean, who is this man? Can somebody tell me WHO IS MITT ROMNEY? It’s a simple question! I don’t know! And the problem is, 75% of you don’t know either! And we want an answer! …Honest to God, I want to like the guy! Who the —-is he?! I don’t know! And that’s the problem.”– Mark Levin
Posted by: J-bone | January 13, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
The President wants to “fire” the redundant and inefficient government employees! Someone should ask him if he enjoys doing this?
Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 13, 2012, 12:15 pm.
LOL! Funny. He said we have a redundant and inefficient structure, which is true. He did NOT say any specific individuals were redundant and inefficient.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 13, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Son of a gun, J-Bone…..I have been asking the same question about Obama for 3 years or so……WHO IS BARACK OBAMA?
Posted by: jistj jjoey | January 13, 2012, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Posted by: jistj jjoey
So, the GOP are democrat copycats in your opinion?
That seems to be the consensus of the Republicans on the blog. Why are all of you so eager to be copycats and leftovers?
If you know who Mitt is, be sure to write in conservatives like Mark Levin.
Since there are so many versions you may fail a fact check.
Posted by: J-bone | January 13, 2012, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
“And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service, and a leaner government.” Works in theory, but what happens when the office of Chief Executive has more power and he isn’t Chief Executive? One of the big problems with national government is one administration arrogating more power for its specific ends and another using that power for a different purpose. Instead of blindly following the philosopy that national government does everything and merging multiple departments into yet another superagency, why not look at eliminating some departments entirely and returning their authority to the states?
Posted by: MyTake | January 13, 2012, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
When pigs fly.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
“He said we have a redundant and inefficient structure, which is true.” But only when Rudolf the red nosed raindeer was asked by Santa to lead his sleigh tonight did all the other reindeer shouted out with glee.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
The president added: “This is a big idea. ”
“The savings the administration claims will come from this move is roughly 1/400th of the $1.2 trillion increase in the debt limit . . . ”
1/400th is not a Big Idea, it’s a certifiable Waste-o-Time™.
Posted by: Noz | January 13, 2012, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
1/400th of 1.2 trillion is 3 billion. That’s a pretty big savings.
Posted by: mettahu | January 13, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Good, do it. It’s not the real problem, but its something that should be done.
Then at the same time, the real problem is the money spent on the military and social benefits far outweighing incoming receipts, resulting in 15 trillion in debt.
Save the billion, here and there – of course. But worry about the 15 trillion going to 28 trillion within 10 years.
Worry about the debt exceeding the size of our economy already, and frankly saying it will go to 28 trillion – that’s just a straight line projection based on current trends, in reality we won’t get to 28 trillion, about 22 trillion or so and this whole pile of cards comes crashing down.
So, you know, spend some time worry about that as well, and let us know what you come up with.
Goodness knows, Romney is silent on the subject, he’s just saying we’ll spend more, tax less, and balance the budget too….woo hoo, fairy tale land is on the way.
Posted by: RoboBobo | January 13, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
FINALLY!!! It took him 3 yrs to finally come up with a plan to cut something! Must be the looming campaign….
Posted by: Kathy in Pa. | January 13, 2012, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Obama simply wants to increase his power, to become even more of a dictator in America.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 13, 2012, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Do you really think he is going to cut government employees when he has spend his entire Presidency expanding them. People, People, I have some ocean front property in AZ if you go for this one.
Posted by: Freedom | January 13, 2012, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Obama fires 80,000 American workers ABC goes silent maybe because they are not union, but military, is why Obama is firing them
President Obama Thursday quietly notified Congress that the government needs another $1.2 trillion to continue operating.
That’s both irresponsible and unpatriotic of him.
How do I know? A presidential candidate named Obama told me.
OBAMA___________VS___________AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | January 13, 2012, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Why don’t they do like most religious nuts: blame Obama
Posted by: tom | January 13, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
BOOK: Obama didn’t want to shake more hands, take more pictures with troops…
The pond scum surfaces along with the truth
OBAMA________VS_______AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | January 13, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Obama and DNC amass $240,000,000
Missing 1.2 billion from Obama friend and confidant Corzine’s MF Globa
$535 million gone from Obama “pet project” Solyndra and Obama fund raiser Kaisor
“follow the money?” lol ABC and democrat talking heads sawyer and little Georgie would get “lost”
OBAMA________VS_______AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | January 13, 2012, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
i’m sure it’s just a coincidence that all the agencies listed are agencies that promote free-market and commercial interests.
Posted by: grumpopolis | January 13, 2012, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
This is exactly what the Republicans want but he is a Democrat so they will stop everything until November. IF a Republican wins, they will suddenly come up with this INCREDIBLE idea as if it were theirs. If Obama takes it in November, Congress will be hard pressed to explain why they do not want a smaller, more efficient government. Federal employment is DOWN – 200,000 jobs at last count. The military MUST share in the cost cutting, they are most of the cost. The employees will not just be fired. What I have read indicates it will be mostly through attrition – do not replace those who retire.
Posted by: pksk531 | January 13, 2012, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Why don’t they do like most religious nuts: blame Obama
Posted by: tom | January 13, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
——————————————————————————————
Are you saying Islam and Judism are nuts? Which ones are “nuts”? Why are you slandering these religions?
Are you now or have you ever been associated with the KKK?
Posted by: Yep I said that | January 13, 2012, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
It won’t happen. Not with Obama. It’s all election year talk.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
PKSK531 (1:30 PM); I don’t know about Republican’s taking credit, but the concept has been a central theme of the Libertarian for YEARS! Ron Paul 2012.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
PKSK531: I’ve decided that Republicans WANT FAILURE until they get in and RUIN the Country AGAIN! As far as I’m concerned, Obama is doing just GREAT and despite these Republicans that are so clueless that it STANDS out on they faces such as Michelle Bachmann’s look of contant surprise. President Obama please do ALL the good things you want because that bunch of NO Guys standing in the way of PROGRESS will lose in November. They can’t HIDE that very CREEPY part of their jealous nature!!! What are the jealous about? That they have a big PILE of LOSERS running for President. And NONE of them are worth too many votes. OBAMA 2012!!!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 13, 2012, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
pksk531 – You mean kind of exactly like how Obama came up with this INCREDIBLE idea that repubs have already discussed publicly
Posted by: whatever | January 13, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
grumpopolis wrote :”i’m sure it’s just a coincidence that all the agencies listed are agencies that promote free-market and commercial interests.”
.
0Boma just wants to consolidate them to give him cover for unlawful appointing of more of his radical cronies to new positions in those agencies. Then his capitalist cronies only have to shop in one place for political favors. Nothing here is being done to promote free-market.
Posted by: Melon Collie | January 13, 2012, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Why does this need to be done by Congress? And if it does, why hasn’t Congress done it in the past?
Posted by: A Cynic | January 13, 2012, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Totally out of character. The guy is a political cameleon.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
melon, i was being sarcastic. and just this weekend sec. of ed. arne “lurch” duncan published an editorial in papers across the nation regarding how “no child left behind” needs to be fixed to allow states and localities more say over curricular matters covered by NCLB because the top-down federal mandates are too broad and do not take into account regional issues, blah blah blah. this is the same fool who presided over the chicago school system which is roundly recognized as one of the most putrid in the nation, and who, when first appointed to his post, made talk-show appearances in which he stated that the solutions to america’s education problems are really quite simple. obama and company are every bit (not saying more so) as absurd as bush and company. bill clinton (like him or hate him) was the last real president we’ve had in this country and likely the last real one we’ll see in quite a while. thinking back to 1980, and regardless of your political views, etc., we had three presidents in a row who were profoundly capable and who exuded a certain level of seriousness that has been completely lacking in our last two presidents. it was hard to believe we could follow up bush with someone equally bad or even worse, but we’ve managed to achieve the seemingly impossible with obama in the white house.
Posted by: grumpopolis | January 13, 2012, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Mr President, while you’re at it ….The Dept of Ed has increased its budget 10-30 times while SAT test scores recently hit a new low; the Dept of Energy was supposed to guie America to energy independence; yet, we’ve only become more dependent; Nixon took over AMTRAC and said it’d be on its feet in a couple of years; the Post Office needed $9B taxpayer assistance last year; we were told welfare would help end poverty, but has it; the war on drugs was supposed to rid us of the drug problem, but has it??? Crony capitalism – Solyndra and other green companies that are failing even with miollions of dollars of taxpayer assistance. There is a consistent pattern – do you see it??? The government has failed or is failing at all of these (and I’m sure there are more).
Posted by: deanbob | January 13, 2012, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Gitmo will be closed – Change 2012
Posted by: DNC | January 13, 2012, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
newcountry, at this point, obama would likely do anything to secure re-election (just like the rest of them). i also think he and his team (now that they know they’ll be running against romney) are very afraid that romney will expose obama’s pitifully inadequate command of financial and economic issues. i’m no big romney fan, but it’s basically unarguable that compared to obama, romney’s a genius when it comes to finance and economics. obama knows absolutely nothing about just about anything in the real world. he’s a living example of the old adage “in theory there’s no difference between theory and practice, but in practice there is.”
Posted by: grumpopolis | January 13, 2012, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Just wait until his political rhetoric runs head long into deep seated political alliances. I wonder if he has devised a real battle plan going forward? Somehow I doubt it. I just can’t believe the man is actually serious.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Yeah, whatever! The guy’s advisers are telling him people are listening to people like Ron Paul.
He’s campaigning these promises, then he’ll never deliver. Obama HIRED thousands of people for the American Community Survey ( which was run by the Department of Commerce ). It asks you what time you wake up, leave your home, how much you make, where you work, how many flights of stairs you have, if you’re handicapped, how many times you flush your toilet…. Then if you don’t fill it out, they threaten you with a fine.
Posted by: tomas | January 13, 2012, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Too bad Congress (The House) can’t be eliminated because THEY are USELESS
Posted by: demNme5 | January 13, 2012, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
so if it made so much sense, why did it take him over 3 years to propose and wait until it’s his re-elcetion year where he needs to be “practical” and moving to the center? and you call yourself a cynic?
Posted by: Aaron | January 13, 2012, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
President Obama said he needs the same kind of “authority that every business owner has to make sure that his or her company keeps pace with the times.”
I’m sorry, but I don’t know that I have heard of many large corporations that have the authority to make these kinds of changes on their own; they have boards, stockholders, etc. This is the kind of authority a small business owner might have, but Obama is not a business owner. He is an elected official.
The idea is not his and yet he has brought it to the forefront as if it was. He is drawing the all eyes to the idea in hopes that no one really pays attention to the fact that he is requesting authority to take action and make decisions that are not his to make alone.
“And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service, and a leaner government.”
Anytime someone feels the need to clarify how they will not take advantage of their new authority or position…I can’t help but recognize that they have already considered how they can.
Posted by: CLR | January 13, 2012, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
From the Chicago Tribune; Obama wants to put the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other trade bodies now spread across Washington, the U.S. Export-Import Bank, Overseas Private Investment Corp, the Trade and Development Agency, the Small Business Administration and parts of the Commerce Department under a new roof – something that has been under discussion for years.
Now be honest. Has anyone even heard of half of these bureacracies?
Posted by: newcountryman | January 13, 2012, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
demnme5, only the house? why not the senate too?
Posted by: grumpopolis | January 13, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Will his next power grab to be change his title to Dictator from President?? If he really was concerned about the $15,000,000,000,000.00 debt then maybe he would cancel OBAMACARE?? The real question for 2012 is are Democrats/Independents really this gullible???
Posted by: whathappened08 | January 13, 2012, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
COMMON_SENSE: “The President wants to “fire” the redundant and inefficient government employees! Someone should ask him if he enjoys doing this?” – - – Good grief, yet another example of a rabidly partisan conservative with a reading comprehension problem severe enough to totally miss the part of the article which clearly states the redundant jobs “will be lost through attrition.” What part of “lost through attrition” was so hard to understand? It looks like COMMON_SENSE is either grossly ignorant about what losing positions through attrition means, is not smart enough to understand what losing positions through attrition means, or is simply too dishonest to correctly characterize the situation.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | January 13, 2012, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
So, since blaming Bush is not working, now obama is blaming Nixon??
Posted by: DJ | January 13, 2012, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
NEWCOUNTRYMAN: “Now be honest. Has anyone even heard of half of these bureacracies?” – - – Actually, yes. Between discussing them in various business classes, and political science class, and being a prolific reader I have heard of all of them.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | January 13, 2012, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Grumpopolis: The Senate is less than 1/3 of the amount of people in the house and the house has quite a few MORONS in it!! I believe people take voting in a Senator much more seriously than they do their Rep. because a Rep only covers a small district of a state while a Senator is voted in by the WHOLE citizenry of the State!!! But, perhaps they ALL SHOULD GO! Of course, I’m just blowing off steam which comes from a huge frustration after seeing THESE Elected Officials DOING NOTHING!! They have a NERVE to tell the poor and unemployed to get themselves up and working but what are THEY doing? NOTHING!
Posted by: demNme5 | January 13, 2012, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Posted by: ANTHONY T | January 13, 2012, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
The word is “Democrat”. Sounds like you were educated by them.
Posted by: Susan | January 13, 2012, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
If he really was concerned about the $15,000,000,000,000.00 debt then maybe he would cancel OBAMACARE??
—————————————
All the non-partisan analysis [like by the CBO] say that eliminating the Affordable Care Act will ADD to the debt. If the Republicans are really concerned about the debt why can’t they submit a budget plan that will reduce it? So far all of their plans will add to the debt significantly. Are Republican voters really that gullible?
Posted by: smoking cures cancer | January 13, 2012, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
If you believe anything he says you are a complete idiot…..especially after 2008.
Posted by: local guy | January 13, 2012, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Another Trillion or he will throw a temper tantrum. When are the congress going to tell him time out and pout in the corner. This is enough guys and girls enough. Wake up his pals are getting richer and blame others for thier good fortune.
Posted by: Jim Rod | January 13, 2012, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
DJ: “So, since blaming Bush is not working, now obama is blaming Nixon??” – - – Small minds only come up with small interpretations and inadequate understanding. I don’t think his point for identifying an objective truth about Nixon was necessarily or simpy to blame Nixon. I think his point was to illustrate Republican hypocrisy – as in they share in the reponsibility for creating and maintaining inefficiencies, and sometimes they have petty political reasons for doing so, and they are too dishonest and petty to acknowledge good ideas that are not their own. All of the passive aggressive petty jabs clearly illustrate that last reality. Instead of praising a good idea all they can do is whine and criticize. The most petty criticism is the small size of the savings for this one effort. Nine more similar improvements can generate total annual reductions of 20,000 government positions and $40B. But if President Obama tries to do that Republicans will only whine with petty criticisms and partisan obstructionism. Basically, using the genetic fallacy is one of the sacred cows they will never stop using because making the other side look bad is more important to them than anything else.
Posted by: B-K KnightRider | January 13, 2012, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Meanwhile…
The Bureau of Economic Analysis announced this morning that the November trade deficit rose to -$47.8 billion, its worst level since June, as imports rose by nearly $3 billion and exports fell by $1.5 billion.
The trade deficit with Germany rose to just below the record level set in October of 2005. The 2011 trade deficit with China is only $1 billion below the record set in 2010, and that’s with a full month to go in 2011. The only question is whether the trade deficit with China will top $300 billion.
The U.S. trade deficit continued its slow but steady worsening since President Obama, in January of 2009, set a goal of doubling exports in five years.
Posted by: Here's Your Change | January 13, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
i’m sure it’s just a coincidence that all the agencies listed are agencies that promote free-market and commercial interests.
Posted by: grumpopolis | January 13, 2012, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Capitalism would have it no other way, says the Republican establishment. “Creative destruction” is, according to the Washington Post, a theology embraced by capitalist extremists — “the notion that the new must relentlessly replace the old so that companies and the economy can become more efficient.”
Posted by: Naomi | January 13, 2012, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Posted by: Here’s Your Change | January 13, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Europe’s prolonged debt crisis is afftecting American exports. This is a surprise to you? Do the right wingers know nothing about the global economy?
Posted by: Jane | January 13, 2012, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
According to a CBS News investigation, the controversial government loan to now-bankrupt Solyndra wasn’t an isolated incident. “CBS This Morning” reporter Sharyl Attkisson explained, “We identified 11 green energy companies beside Solyndra that, together, got billions of tax dollars then declared bankruptcy or are suffering other serious financial issues.”
A CBS graphic blared, “The New Solyndras.” Co-host Charlie Rose touted this scoop as one “you’ll only see on” CBS.” It will be interesting to see if ABC and NBC follow up on the investigation’s findings that there is “a pattern of the government pouring your tax dollars into clean energy.” Attkisson exposed a $43 million loan to a “dismal” green energy company and another linked to Harry Reid.
Posted by: I like solar power | January 13, 2012, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Only Nixon could go to China. Bill Clinton reformed welfare. Obama is slashing the military and wants to close business related government entities. Instead if he proposed closing/reforming the Education Department, Health and Human Services Energy Department and other liberal sacred cows he may not look so politically motivated. Can anyone say enemies list.
Posted by: ionagoal | January 13, 2012, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Be careful, Iona, according to Ron Paul’s super Pac parodies, Santorum wants to blow up everything staring with an I. Iraq, Iran, Ikea….
And it looks like Newt is on the rise in SC. He started bouncing back as the firing squad on Bain began. Something to be gleaned from that for democrats?
Posted by: J-bone | January 13, 2012, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
POSTED BY: B-K KNIGHTRIDER | JANUARY 13, 2012, 3:58 PM =====This guy actually believes people take the time to read his entire rants…
Posted by: whining liberal | January 13, 2012, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
0Bama has added TRILLIONS to the debt, but now he says he will save $3 Billion over ten years to convince people he is not a big government left wing liberal.
Posted by: Melon Collie | January 13, 2012, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
What a sad lot of Republican candidates. Regardless of any missteps or shortcomings, the current President is far, far better than anyone the Republicans have put forward.
And Melon Collie, you would better serve your own intelligence and the country if you bothered to research the roots of the current debt, how the economic crash on Bush’s shift stripped billions in tax revenues out of the system, how the two wars continued to bankrupt the nation, same with the seniors drug plan, same with the Bush tax cuts.
Bush rang up spending AND cut taxes leaving the country in larger deficit and debt and in a very poor state to handle the economic crash on his watch.
Oh I know! Let’s just blame it on Obama. Most right wingers don’t even believe that hogwash anymore.
Posted by: Janie | January 13, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Will save $3 billion OVER 10 YEARS. Our deficit spending under this president amounts to $4.1 BILLION PER DAY. So, this bold move to downsize government won’t even equal one day’s worth of this president’s deficit spending. I suppose this is considered a big deal if you’re a big-government liberal democrat. This is why we need a BENEFICIAL change in the Oval Office next year.
Posted by: s | January 13, 2012, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Jane (4:11 PM) Our exports are 13% of our economy. 19% of those go to Europe (26% to our NAFTA partners). If Europe were to experience another massive recession (say a 10% conrtraction) the effect on our economy would be a reduction of one tenth of one fifth of one seventh of our economy, or less than three tenths of one percent. That is a rounding error in economic terms. The multitude of regulations passed by this administration have reduced our growth rate by a far greater amount.
Posted by: ionagoal | January 13, 2012, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
i agree with Janie-none of these Republican candidates have run anything of substance.None have seen the halls of an Ivy league college or taught at a college level like President Obama.Could any of them write a book like “Dreams…”? I doubt it.
Posted by: gobama | January 13, 2012, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Pres Barry requests $1.2 trillion debt increase Thursday. (To go along with his already-racked up $5 trillion debt.)
Then on Friday he announces a plan to save a whopping $3 billion.
And the liberal media laps it up.
Posted by: bl | January 13, 2012, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Pres Barry requests $1.2 trillion debt increase Thursday. (To go along with his already-racked up record $5 trillion debt in 3 years.)
Then on Friday he announces a plan to save a whopping $3 billion.
And the liberal media laps it up.
Posted by: bl | January 13, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Posted by: ionagoal | January 13, 2012, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Perhaps you missed it, we were talking about the reductions in balance of trade, not the overall economy.
Posted by: Jane | January 13, 2012, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Posted by: bl | January 13, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
President Obama’s submitted budget for 2012 was not that different from President Bush’s for 2009. The later was $3.107 trillion, the former was $3.729. Given that the interest alone on “Bush’s debt” was $450 BILLION in 2008, and has been similar since, the total amount we’ve had to pay in interest on “Bush’s debt” since Obama became president is close to $1.25 TRILLION dollars. You can’t blame the interest on Bush’s debt on Obama – sorry we all recognize that is not fair.
Posted by: Janie | January 13, 2012, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Posted by: Janie | January 13, 2012, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
No senators voted for President Obama’s 2012 budget when it came up for a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate. A procedural vote to move forward on the president’s plan failed 0-97.
Posted by: Susan | January 13, 2012, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Posted by: Susan | January 13, 2012, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Given that the interest alone on “Bush’s debt” was $450 BILLION in 2008, and has been similar since, the total amount we’ve had to pay in interest on “Bush’s debt” since Obama became president is close to $1.25 TRILLION dollars. You can’t blame the interest on Bush’s debt on Obama – sorry we all recognize that is not fair.
Posted by: Janie | January 13, 2012, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
“1/400th of 1.2 trillion is 3 billion. That’s a pretty big savings.” – mettahu
No it isn’t.
1/400 of $20,000 is $50.
If you were buying a car and the dealer took $50 off you wouldn’t say that’s big.
Posted by: Noz | January 14, 2012, 9:53 am 9:53 am
No senators voted for President Obama’s 2012 budget when it came up for a vote in the Democrat-controlled Senate. A procedural vote to move forward on the president’s plan failed 0-97. Posted by: Susan | January 13, 2012, 9:36 pm.
Typical Republican post. WHY did the vote go that way? What was the reason? I dare you to post the answer!
Posted by: A Cynic | January 14, 2012, 10:40 am 10:40 am
OK, obviously the Republicans are correct here. We should NOT try to save a few bucks, we should NOT try to streamline the federal government at all, and we should NOT try to consolidate and make these various departments more efficient. We should simply go on with business as usual. That is what will make them happy and stop their whining.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 14, 2012, 10:43 am 10:43 am
What I’ve been hearing lately is the Obama proposal is to create yet another “point of contact” bureaucratic office for small business to simplify or streamline the “process(es)” they need to address, and not necessarily eliminate much of anything. Now that would dovetail with what I know about Obama.
Posted by: newcountryman | January 14, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
LOL! This “liberal” president loves to raise taxes and grow government. Imagine that: he extended the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, gave a tax cut to the middle class and small businesses, and now is consolidating departments with overlapping responsibilities for greater efficiency. This guy is insane. Seriously!
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 14, 2012, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
___” Republicans will block this……”
POSTED BY: STEVE | JANUARY 13, 2012, 12:09 PM 12:09 PM___________Oh, they’ll block anything. It is a syndrome within the party.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 14, 2012, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
“I mean, who is this man? Can somebody tell me WHO IS MITT ROMNEY? It’s a simple question! I don’t know! And the problem is, 75% of you don’t know either! And we want an answer! …Honest to God, I want to like the guy! Who the —-is he?! I don’t know! And that’s the problem.”– Mark Levin
POSTED BY: J-BONE | JANUARY 13, 2012, 12:16 PM 12:16 PM____________You think Mitt Romney is a “conservative?” The man has all of you people fooled
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 14, 2012, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
___”The president added: “This is a big idea. ”
“The savings the administration claims will come from this move is roughly 1/400th of the $1.2 trillion increase in the debt limit . . . ”
1/400th is not a Big Idea, it’s a certifiable Waste-o-Time™.”
POSTED BY: NOZ | JANUARY 13, 2012, 12:58 PM 12:58 PM________Every penny in the piggy bank counts. Just saying.
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | January 14, 2012, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Here’s an idea. Get government OUT of the business of deciding which businesses fail and which succeed. Streamline from 6 agencies to 0, not 1.
Posted by: Joe White | January 14, 2012, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
“Every penny in the piggy bank counts. Just saying.” – NoFlyZone2
Yes that’s right but when the NoBo administration spends it’s time and energy coming up with ways to save pennies when it needs to save dollars then it is a failure.
Posted by: Noz | January 15, 2012, 11:51 am 11:51 am