Jan 14, 2012 1:25pm

Rick Santorum Says His Background Makes Him a Better Candidate Than Mitt Romney

GREENVILLE, S.C. — After weeks of dancing around their diverse backgrounds, Rick Santorum today attempted to draw a  clear contrast between himself and Mitt Romney, saying his blue collar upbringing makes him a better candidate in crucial swing states than Romney’s experience at a private equity firm.

“You want to win this election? Then we’ve got to go to the states where you win the election and it’s Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, North Carolina, Missouri, Wisconsin. How do you win elections as a Republican in these states? You do it by getting Reagan Democrats to vote for you,” Santorum told a crowd of about 200 before laying into his opponent.

“I respect Mitt Romney’s career in business, but the grandson of a coalminer who grew up in public housing in a steel town in Western Pennsylvania and whose policies are oriented toward helping those and whose record is a track record of working in those blue collar communities has a much better chance of winning those states than an executive from Bain Capital,” he said.

When Santorum was young he lived in Veteran’s Administration housing with his parents. Both of his parents worked for the V.A., his mother as a nurse and his father as a psychologist. He did not live in low income housing, instead living on the grounds because of his parents’ careers.

Santorum has refused to criticize Romney for his work at Bain Capital, something both Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry have made an issue of while trying to make gains on the race’s frontrunner. Friday in Gaffney, S.C., Santorum said that for him the issue is completely off the table.

“I am not going to be critical of him for practicing free market capitalism in the private equity business. And the reason is because I believe in capitalism, both constructive capitalism and deconstructive capitalism,” Santorum said at a campaign stop at a fast food restaurant.

At Tommy’s Country Ham House today, the former Pennsylvania senator also jabbed the race’s frontrunner for his health care plan in Massachusetts, which was expected to be a central campaign theme but has hardly been pounced on by rivals.

Santorum said it makes Romney unable to take on President Obama in a general election.

“Why would we pick someone who’s had a record as a liberal governor of Massachusetts to lead our country at a time we need fundamental change?” he said. “The problem is the person who’s leading in the polls in the primary is someone who can’t make that case because he passed a bill similar to ‘Obamacare’ and still says today it was the right thing to do.”

“He says it was the right thing for Massachusetts. What do you think Obama is going to do with that? ‘Oh, it’s right for Massachusetts.’ And he’s said at times it would be right for the country. He’s going to destroy him. That issue will be gone,” he said. “The most important issue we have in this election about fundamental freedom and the role of government in your lives we forfeit. Why would we do that?”

He added that “just because” Romney says he will repeal the president’s health care plan now, it doesn’t mean he will.

“What would make you think the American public would trust him to do it in the future?” Santorum said.

Romney may be ahead in the race for the first in the South primary held next week and Santorum is targeting him, but he rarely contrasts himself with others in the race, including those candidates he is more closely competing with in the polls like Newt Gingrich, although Friday night in Duncan he did criticize the former speaker’s immigration stance.

He got in another veiled hit at Romney today when talking about his own socially conservative platform, saying being president is “not just an economic plan.”

“We just don’t need someone who goes out there and says ‘I’m a good manager,’” Santorum said. “We’re not running a business here, we’re running a moral enterprise that is America.”

He implored the audience to vote for him and said Republicans need a candidate who “reflect(s) the values” of people in this region of the Palmetto State, the most conservative part of South Carolina.

“Folks here in the upstate understand faith. They understand families instill faith, and with faith comes a moral understanding of what your obligations are, not just to your God, but to your fellow men,” Santorum said. “The less moral we are, the less well behaved we are, the bigger government gets and the less free all of us become.

Santorum planned to travel to Mt. Pleasant later today for more campaign stops before going to the coast tomorrow as he fights to regain the momentum he had when he lost to Romney by only eight votes earlier this month in Iowa.

He came in fifth in the New Hampshire primary, not even cracking double digits, but he has said he hopes the more socially conservative and religious electorate in this state is a better match.

SHOWS:

User Comments

If running today as he did in 1980, Reagan would be too moderate. He raised taxes, raised the deficit -nope, they would never like him now ;)

Posted by: pksk531 | January 14, 2012, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Another Chistian talking like the Devil.

Posted by: esr | January 14, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

This Santorum is so full of himself. Reminds me of another politician.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 14, 2012, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“We just don’t need someone who goes out there and says ‘I’m a good manager,’” Santorum said. “We’re not running a business here, we’re running a moral enterprise that is America.”

A “moral enterprise”?!?!? Dear Rick, there are many many people in this country who think that YOU are singularly unsuited to run a moral ANYTHING in this country. Your record of bigotry and hatred towards a certain segment of the population precludes you being taken seriously as a ‘moral’ candidate. If that is what you are going to run on, you may as well go home right now. Because in a fight like that, you WILL lose.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 14, 2012, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Santorum said, “The most important issue we have in this election about fundamental freedom and the role of government in your lives we forfeit.”

Funny that he talks about “fundamental freedom and the role of government in your lives”, considering that if it were up to HIM, the fundamental right to choose what to do with your own body would be stripped away from half the US population. And the fundamental freedom associated with being allowed to marry the person you love would be forever forbidden to a certain segment of the population. What a flaming hypocrite. The freedoms HE would allow are only the ones that align with HIS personal religious beliefs.

Posted by: A Cynic | January 14, 2012, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Santorum is just going through the motions of political theater. Obama does it much much better.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 14, 2012, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Now HE is fully intending, from the way he is written up here, to completely through out the separation of church and state. It almost sounds like, should he be President, there would be a litmus test based upon how “Christian” he and his minions deem you to be. If you agree 100% with them you are okay. In other words, you must want to live in the 18th century, where women had no power, no control over their own bodies or destinies, etc. THAT is not the what the USA is about – and never has been!!

Posted by: pksk531 | January 14, 2012, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

So, here’s my epiphany: Mitt Romney simply can’t help himself. He sees a problem, and his mind immediately sets to work solving it, sometimes consciously, and sometimes not-so-consciously. He doesn’t do it for self-aggrandizement, or for personal gain. He does it because that’s just how he’s wired.

Many people are unaware of the fact that when Romney was asked by his old employer, Bill Bain, to come back to Bain & Company as CEO to rescue the firm from bankruptcy, Romney left Bain Capital to work at Bain & Company for an annual salary of one dollar. When Romney went to the rescue of the 2002 Salt Lake Olympics, he accepted no salary for three years, and wouldn’t use an expense account. He also accepted no salary as Governor of Massachusetts.

Character counts!!

americaneedsmitt

Posted by: wethepeepoh | January 15, 2012, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.