Jan 1, 2012 7:51pm
Romney Compares Obama’s Campaign Promises to Failed Kardashian Marriage
EmailCOUNCIL BLUFFS, Iowa — Mitt Romney is apparently “Keeping up with the Kardashians,” like the rest of America.
During a rally in western Iowa Sunday evening, Romney compared President Barack Obama’s campaign promises to the failed nuptials of reality star Kim Kardashian.
“I’ve been looking at some video clips on YouTube of President Obama, then-candidate Obama going through Iowa, making promises,” Romney said. “I think the gap between his promises and his performance is the largest I’ve seen, well, since the Kardashian wedding and the promise of until death do we part.”
Kardashian made headlines earlier this year when she ended her marriage to NBA player Kris Humphries after just 72 days.
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012 
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
I knew it! Obama is the Kim Kardashian of politics;HYPE,UNWORTHINESS,FAKE,PROTECTED BY MONEY AND CHEAP,UGLY PR STRATEGIES…uber liberal,sleazy..It goes on…….
Posted by: jn | January 1, 2012, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
I would call Mitt Romney the Kim Kardashian of politics, but that would be a grave insult to Kim.
Posted by: midfield91 | January 1, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
What an idiotic comment by Sir No Personality Mitt Romoney
Posted by: S | January 1, 2012, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
Romney keeps making the most idiotic remarks that make him look like fooishl. President Obama will clean the floor with this billionaire who has shown no concern for all the people he has shown the door. Lying and accusing others of things that he just makes up is not improving his image.
Posted by: Vicki | January 2, 2012, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Only one reply to another brainless comment from Romney…. “Hey Mitt, why do you refuse to show the voters your 2011 tax filing? Is it because it will show that you, like many of your fellow multimillionaires, only paid 15-to-18% of your income towards taxes?
Posted by: Shallow "R's" Are Fun To Watch | January 2, 2012, 2:07 am 2:07 am
Folks if you want to see Mitt’s tax returns, as POTUS his tax returns will be filed on the public record.
Elect him President and you can see his tax returns.
Posted by: Romney Supporter | January 2, 2012, 4:13 am 4:13 am
X republican, I think just about everybody saw what Obama’s true agenda was signing a bill late in the evening and hoping nobody would notice. For a constitutional scholar he has little respect for it or maybe he was never one to start with. You just saw more of your freedoms swept under the rug with a stroke of his pen again, are you proud of him or will you speak up for your rights. Remember, if you say to much they can come take you away and throw you in jail indefinitely or worse. Thanks to Obama, those terrorist in Gitmo now have more rights than you or I. We still have one chance, Ron Paul, he will over turn this tragedy and a few others when he is elected.
Posted by: specialty57 | January 2, 2012, 6:34 am 6:34 am
All but Ron Paul ask, “Constitution, what’s that?”. Most on both sides say 1 thing and do another.
Posted by: deanbob | January 2, 2012, 7:16 am 7:16 am
I was shocked to see this blurp from Rommeny about Obama, how low can you stoop, this may cause you some votes, I know it has mine
Posted by: Fran | January 2, 2012, 8:07 am 8:07 am
The Republican Propaganda Machine has pumped out all kinds of lies over the last 3 years. But when you have the record the Republicans have, the truth doesn’t help you. If any of this year’s crop of Republican Candidates becomes President, we will be in trouble. Just look at Wisconsin and Ohio.
Posted by: mike | January 2, 2012, 8:30 am 8:30 am
SPECIALTY57 (6:34 AM)…. I hate to tell you this, but, you need to wake up from “naive land” sooner or later. Although I like SOME of what Ron Paul has to say, the problem is that in many areas he is WAY too extreme for middle America to be willing to accept him total as a President.
Plus, his own party, i.e., Republicans, will not allow him to be that party’s nominee for the Presidency. The powers-that-be in the Republican party will prevent that from happening. And if you think I’m wrong, go watch how Rupert Murdoch’s propaganda station (Fox News) treats Ron Paul every time they have him on… LOL!
If Ron Paul were running with any other letter, other than an “(R)”, beside his name, he may have a chance at the White House. But as long as he has that “(R)” beside his name, he’ll never make it. Because the Big “(R)’s” won’t allow it to happen. Throwing a vote at him, is a wasted vote. And his naive supporters are going to learn this sad fact AGAIN (for the third time) in 2012.
…and although I like some of what Paul says, I for one would never vote for Paul also, as long as he has that “(R)” beside his name. Sorry, I had enough of the “(R)s” to last a life time under both G.W. Bush and Ronald Reagan. Both who claimed to be “smaller government” “fiscal conservatives”… LOL!… and both who proved to be anything BUT either of those two things.
Posted by: Shallow "R's" Are Fun To Watch | January 2, 2012, 9:42 am 9:42 am