Romney May Rue Immigration Comments Come General Election Showdown With Obama
After his narrow victory in Iowa and resounding win in New Hampshire, Mitt Romney may well be on his way to locking up the Republican nomination before the primary is even a month old. But the damage that the GOP fight has done to his chances of winning the general election may prove to be severe if he cannot convince Latino voters to give him another shot.
While Romney’s efforts to woo his party’s conservative voters have clearly helped him in the two contests thus far, the former Massachusetts governor has veered far to the right on the issue that most affects Latinos: immigration.
Only days before the Iowa caucuses, for instance, Romney said that as president he would veto the DREAM Act, a bill that would provide a path to citizenship for some undocumented children of immigrants who attend college or serve in the military. The fall-out from Latinos was immediate. The next day I asked Juan Rodriguez, a Republican businessman in Des Moines, if he would back Romney. Rodriguez didn’t hesitate in his response.
“I wouldn’t vote for Romney because he doesn’t support immigration reform or the DREAM Act,” he said. “My business depends on Hispanics basically, and if there’s no immigration reform we are going to be very affected. Not just me, but all the businesses that, like us, depend on the Latino community.”
The next week in New Hampshire, I sat down with Esteban and Selma Lopez, a Latino couple in Goffstown who will vote for the first time in the general election this fall, and asked if they could imagine voting for Romney now.
“I work in education and I know first-hand how important the DREAM Act is for Latino youth, for kids who are in this country without having taken part in the decision to come here,” Lopez replied. “The short answer is, I wouldn’t vote for Romney.”
Even the country’s largest Latino Republican group – Somos Republicans – said they would oppose Romney due to his immigration policies.
The Obama campaign has wasted no time in trying to portray Romney as the most extreme candidate on the issue of immigration. In the days since Romney’s DREAM Act statement, a slew of Latino Democrats has fanned out to rip Romney. After all, there’s a lot at stake here: Latinos are the nation’s fastest-growing voting bloc, with an estimated 12.2 million set to vote in this year’s general election, according to a projection by the National Association of Latino Elected & Appointed Officials (NALEO).
“It really demonstrates how far he is from understanding the issue,” said Rep. Charlie Gonzalez of Texas, the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, on a conference call with reporters last week. “I understand that in that particular field one will try to out-pander another, but you still have to be responsible.”
“How do you paint yourself into such a corner on immigration where you can’t walk back from that statement?” he asked.
On primary night in New Hampshire I sat down with Rep. Xavier Becerra, D-Calif., who emphasized that Democrats are going to remind Latino voters time and time again about Romney’s immigration stance.
“It appears that the Republicans are so committed to moving to the far right to win the tea party vote that they have forgotten about the rest of American voters – the independents, the Latinos,” Becerra told me in Manchester. “It appears that they have said that at this moment what matters to them is the tea party because they want to be the nominee. And because of that we are hearing people like Mitt Romney who says whatever he needs to to win. But unfortunately for him there is a record, there are facts – and the facts are the things that are going to be used to judge who is the real Mitt Romney.”
“He’s already said to our immigrant children who perform military service or who go to college – go away. The DREAM Act, that bill to give those students an opportunity to move forward here? No. To immigrant families? Split them up,” Becerra added.
Now that he appears well on his way to winning the GOP primary, Romney has tried to court Latino voters. In New Hampshire last Sunday, Romney mentioned that his father, George, was born in Mexico and came to the United States at age five. On Wednesday he took to the airwaves in Florida with a new Spanish-language ad entitled “Nosotros,” meaning “us.” The Republican National Committee got in on the act, too, announcing a beefed-up outreach effort to Hispanic voters.
But it may be too little, too late. Even before his DREAM Act comments, Romney faced an uphill battle with Latinos. A poll conducted by Latino Decisions for Univision in November found that among registered Hispanic voters in the 21 most Hispanic-heavy states, Obama held a whopping 67 percent to 24 percent lead over Romney.
While Romney could make up some ground among Latinos by selecting someone like Cuban-American Florida Sen. Marco Rubio or former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush as his eventual running mate, the GOP may have missed a golden opportunity to swing the 2012 election by earning the backing of Latino voters.
In my stops along the campaign trail in recent months, I have encountered numerous Latinos disillusioned with President Obama’s inaction on comprehensive immigration reform measures. In Las Vegas last November, I talked to a single mother of two named Ana who said she voted for Obama in 2008, but won’t do so again in 2012, no matter who the GOP nominates.
“No ha hecho nada,” she said, shaking her head. “He hasn’t done anything.”
Earlier this month in West Liberty, Iowa – the state’s first majority Hispanic town – Jose Zacarias complained that Obama “should have focused more on Latino issues like immigration and the DREAM Act.”
“He spent too much time politically on the issue of universal health care and almost no time on Latino issues,” sighed Zacarias.
But Zacarias told me he will still vote for Obama because no Hispanic “in his right mind” is going to vote for a Republican candidate like Romney or Texas Gov. Rick Perry.
“It might be a tough sell [for Obama], but I think the GOP is helping a lot by putting those guys forward.”
In the face of media scrutiny following his DREAM Act veto threat, Romney has defended his immigration stance, arguing that Latinos don’t need a “handout” like the Democrats’ bill but rather more economic opportunity, something that he says will occur if he wins the White House this year.
“Mitt Romney is a strong proponent of legal immigration,” said Romney spokesman Albert Martinez. “He wants to attract job creators and innovators from other countries because he recognizes that immigrants are key to powering many of our industries. Mitt Romney will raise caps on high-skill visas and will staple a green card to any eligible graduate with an advanced degree in math, science or engineering. Mitt Romney is opposed to illegal immigration and amnesty because it is unfair to those who want to come to this country legally.”
“The Hispanic community in Florida, like in the rest of America, have been disproportionately impacted by unemployment, and President Obama’s failed economic policies have left tens of thousands of Florida Hispanics unemployed,” Martinez said. “Mitt Romney is a proven leader and job creator, and will work to undo the job-killing policies of President Obama.”
But if he fails to soothe Hispanics’ dismay with his immigration stance, Romney may never get the chance.
Matthew Jaffe is covering the 2012 campaign for ABC News & Univision.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
This article is so by-the-book it’s laughable.
First of all, we’ve all learned that the media is overwhelmingly pro-illegal immigration despite that fact that most US citizens are not. Odd. But the media knows that as soon as it actually makes the distinction between “legal immigration” and “illegal immigration,” it has a much harder time of pushing its agenda, thus the completely misleading headline of this piece.
Second of all, it’s incredibly insulting to Latinos everywhere that this article either presumes that all Latinos in the US are here illegally, or that all Latinos in the US support illegal immigration.
I guess I could say “Nice try” to ABC News and Matthew Jaffe; still, it’s disturbing to note that journalists like Jaffe and organizations such as ABC are still unaware that it’s going to be increasingly difficult for you folks to push your pro-illegal immigration bias. The majority of the country can see through such transparent attempts and just isn’t embracing silly stories like this anymore.
Finally, finally, America has woken up.
Posted by: Ted | January 16, 2012, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Obama has deported more illegals than George Bush so I don’t see how he lies his way out of that one.
Posted by: Reality | January 16, 2012, 7:10 am 7:10 am
Romney’s company Bain, were huge contributors to the Democrat National Party
Posted by: Mark | January 16, 2012, 7:14 am 7:14 am
“I wouldn’t vote for Romney because he doesn’t support immigration reform or the DREAM Act,” -There are many, many more voters that will vote for Romney because he’s in opposition to immigration reform and the DREAM act. Immigration reform is merely a ploy, the furtherance of a mistake that was made during Reagan’s administration. We have lived to see how well that works, haven’t we.
Posted by: john locke | January 16, 2012, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Many of us want their to be a solution to immigration but we know netiehr party has the courage to secure the borders. The Demcrats don’t want a solution as it gives them a wedge isssue, the republicans don’t want it as it gives them cheap labor.
Wouldn’t it be nice if someone could stand up and say ‘I am for the American people and this is what I am going to do for alll of us’ instead of this pandering to one group or another?
Posted by: david | January 16, 2012, 7:46 am 7:46 am
we gave papers to a lot of illegals in the 1986 ‘amnesty’. looks like that did not fix anything. so now the candidates should only have two words for illegals: “Start packing.”
Posted by: mikki | January 16, 2012, 7:56 am 7:56 am
DAVID: Check out Ron Paul.
Posted by: john locke | January 16, 2012, 7:57 am 7:57 am
You have to laugh when you see media reports and comments that say deportation out paces previous administration. The numbers may say yes but the percentages say no. If you have 100 illegals and deport 1 that’s 1% but if you have 200 illegals and deport 2, the numbers double but the percentage hasn’t changed. It’s still 1%. Fact is FY 2010 deportations is down 16% from FY 2008. We shouldn’t be having these comments but rather be asking why were not preventing the flow and why we’re placating to the illegals to begin with. During the Reagan administration amnesty program not all illegal aliens signed up for the program. That should show everyone something. Fact is they don’t want citizenship.
Posted by: Bob | January 16, 2012, 8:02 am 8:02 am
Since a large portion of U.S. Citizen with foreign roots in Latino countries knowingly betray their fellow U.S. Citizens by supporting illegal alien invaders instead of their U.S. countrymen, allowing more to come in is a guarantee of every other Race being replaced by Latinos.Supporting a criminal invasion of your own country because the invaders are of the same race is notdonly incredibly racist, but treasonous as well.
Posted by: scizen | January 16, 2012, 8:11 am 8:11 am
well it seems Romneys company Bain is a huge contributor to the DNP
Posted by: Mark | January 16, 2012, 8:20 am 8:20 am
well if your not voting for Romney because he doesn’t support the Dream Act , then your
an illegal and you have no right to vote.
Posted by: mike moran | January 16, 2012, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Illegal aliens that are deported NEVER have to split up their family. They have the option to take their kids with them. Just because they decide to abandon their kids does not mean that our immigration system if forcing them to do so.
Posted by: Ron Lane | January 16, 2012, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I’m a 5th generation Hispanic whose family came here legally. We have worked hard to see that our family has made progress in the good old United States of America. We all worked our way through school—no grants available when we attended college. I see the illegals that make demands and receive more benefits than the legal Hispanics. Go visit the schools by the border towns or in South Texas. Illegals receive free lunch, free training, free and better medical attention, free clothes, free everything. Why don’t you ask the legal Hispanics how they feel about the Dream Act and the deportation of illegals. We are tired of having to tolerate people that have broken the law and in many cases refuse to learn to speak English. Why should they, we translate everything for them . MITT ROMNEY is our choice. He is a good, smart, conservative that has a clear vision of how to solve America’s problems.
Posted by: emma | January 16, 2012, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Haha not fair to those who want to come legally LMAO,,,, even those that are doing it the legall way are not getting processed either; why do you think the illegal numbers are so great?
When those that are doing it the legal way are told they are looking at 35 years plus to be with family what do you expect them to do say ok I want to keep some jerk happy and not stay and spend the last of my/parents days with my family?
Stop screwing around with legitimate applications who have legal path and you will see the numbers drop.
Posted by: LostNTime | January 16, 2012, 9:20 am 9:20 am
IT’S MITT ROMNEY’S STAND ON IMMIGRATION THAT MADE PEOPLE LIKE ME ENDEAR TO HIM. ITS ABOUT TIME THAT A PRESIDENT POSSESS AN UNEQUIVOCAL STAND ON THE RULE OF LAW…. NO IFS, NO BUTS, NO SPECIAL INTEREST TO ANY PARTIES, JUST PLAIN AND SIMPLE.. RULE OF LAW.
Posted by: Nelia Casin | January 16, 2012, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Mark, you have nothing to contribute to this article, typical liberal, so you try and switch the topic, does not work, while everyone was up in arms over the so-called recess appointment, Pres.Obama quietly instituted amnesty for hundred thousands of illegal immegrats, but you missed that little tidbit. Maybe when the media and you learn the difference between LEGAL and ILLEGAL than maybe we can solve te problem. Sad but to many in the hispanic community believe the LIES that they are being told by the democrats and liberals.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 16, 2012, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I don’t understand that somebody with his mexican family and atroné robots in México despite his own blood line, and reject his family tree. That is why the voters reject Romney don’t have respect for family ties….
Posted by: Luis | January 16, 2012, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Pres.Obama quietly instituted amnesty for hundred thousands of illegal immigrants, but you missed that little tidbit. Posted by: Lizzie | January 16, 2012, 9:51 am
Repeat a lie often enough, and you start to believe it yourself. Last week it was “millions of immigrants”, now it’s “hundred thousands”. Stop lying Lizzie. It diminishes you. Prove this lie or let it die.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 16, 2012, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Any business relying on illegal immigrants for labor should be put out of business. They are taking advantage of people for their own profit motives.
Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 16, 2012, 11:31 am 11:31 am
A President Romney will not eliminate immigration. He will not reward those who break laws to gain an unfair immigration advantage!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 16, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am
A President Romney will not eliminate immigration. He will not reward those who break laws to gain an unfair immigration advantage! Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 16, 2012, 11:58 am.
HUH?!?!? Please restate and clarify this, as it appears you posted mutually exclusive statements here.
Posted by: A Cynic | January 16, 2012, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Illegal immigrants will not be given an unfair advantage. Legal immigrants who play by the rules will be welcome with open arms!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | January 16, 2012, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
There’s No One that wants to stop legal immigration, it’s the illegals we want to stop.
Posted by: Reason | January 16, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Americans support LEGAL immigration. Americans reject rewards for immigration LAWBREAKERS! If you selfishly violated our laws, you DO NOT deserve rights on par with LEGAL immigrants. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION is extremely harmful to AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants (the costs, social welfare and otherwise are astronomical).
Further, it is a despicable notion that these lawbreakers are entitled to violate our immigration laws with impunity and then to receive rewards for having done so. Similarly, the notion that in order to win election you must promise favors and rewards for the immigration lawbreakers is FALSE, DESPICABLE, and INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST! Likewise, the notion that in order to be pro-Latino you must promise rewards for immigration lawbreaking is extremely insulting!
If you selfishly violated our laws and jumped to the front of the line, you deserve the hardship that comes with being a lawbreaker— you do not deserve rewards! You DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHTS OF A LEGAL IMMIGRANT (who played by the rules, waited the wait, paid the price, went through a background check, etc.)!
American citizens (including this Democrat) are FED UP WITH THIS BLACKMARKET LABOR SCHEME! Those who pander to the ILLEGAL FOREIGN NATIONALS and their insufferable advocates will LOSE BIG TIME IN ELECTION 2012— because we understand such pandering to be the lowest form of campaign device!
A GOVERNMENT WHICH REFUSES TO ENFORCE ITS OWN LAWS IS INTOLERABLE! If you are advocating for rewards for immigration lawbreakers, you will NOT be tolerated in Election 2012!
Posted by: AngelicaS | January 16, 2012, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
facts facts facts please. sorry gop but legal immigration is a mess all hispanic people now,s that,10 t0 25 years to immigrate legally wow, so, gop, please don,t play that card and look the future,if you don,t like the illegal immigration fix this mess,but if you only want to pandering your old age right wing base and make no changes, will be ok, for now, but this is not a good and realistic politics for the future of the party,remember hispanics are growing in numbers and votes, and maybe in 5, 10,20 or 100 years hispanic population will be a big factor in any politic election,just look the future and the facts please,and maybe legal and illegal immigration are 2 different things but this 2 things are connected in different ways
Posted by: ponch | January 16, 2012, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Mexico gave Romey’s family amnesty whe they were on the run from the US for practicing polygamy. Now he’s all about the law even if the law and NAFTA are destroying the lives of millions of people. Please, he’s a hypocrite, and he will lose.
Posted by: Susan | January 16, 2012, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Something needs to be done about immigration. The plans should be:
To deport all illegals with criminal records,
Give a green card to those hard working individuals with the conditions!
The conditions should be:
To pay taxes every year,
Pay their own (and their famillies) health insurance
Do not allow them to apply for any state or federal aid for 15 years
Posted by: virginia | February 1, 2012, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm