Ron Paul Addresses Boos From South Carolina GOP Debate

Charles Dharapak/AP Photo/Pool
Ron Paul is pushing back against critics of his “Golden Rule” in foreign policy and questioned those who booed him at Monday’s GOP presidential debate.
Speaking in Spartanburg, S. C. Tuesday afternoon, Paul referenced America’s threats of an oil embargo on Iran.
“This is why I bring up the “the golden rule” if we don’t want people to ban oil imports to our country, why should we do that to another country,” said Paul adding “I don’t know why that is such a negative term for people to boo that. ”
Paul also said that America needs to do away with the idea that it will only talk to nations it deems as perfect adding only until America is itself perfect can it make such judgments.
Paul’s willingness to stand up for what he believes in when it comes to U.S. involvement in foreign countries hurt him repeatedly in Monday’s debate.
The conservative Republican electorate in South Carolina booed Paul’s answers on foreign policy and Texas Gov. Rick Perry even suggested that a gong should have been used to cut Paul off.
On Wednesday, Paul takes a break from the campaign trail and returns to Washington to vote against the increase in the nation’s debt ceiling.
The fiscal conservative called Wednesday’s vote a “gimmick” and said even if Congress votes it down it automatically goes into effect.
“It’s such a mess,” said Paul.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
How can We the people sue these biased Mainstream parent owner, for affecting our decision on something as important as president? They are guilty cause Ron Paul is a Candidate and electoral poll votes shows hes Electable. I would gladly be apart of this and sure millions of others feel it has affected there vote also
Posted by: OldWiseAlien | January 18, 2012, 3:21 am 3:21 am
this is a two man race in the gop. Only paul and mit made it on the ballot of ohio and virginia. How does the gop think they can win without ron pauls supporters?
Posted by: brandon | January 18, 2012, 3:35 am 3:35 am
When I hear people people say “RuPaul has a better chance of becoming president than Ron Paul” l smile. What most people don’t get is the Ron Paul campaign is not about one 76 yr old doctor with a stilted, sometimes stumbling delivery. It’s a movement about an idea. That idea is liberty. Liberty is something both Democrats and Republicans have gradually walked away from in this country.
Liberty means you have a right your life, your body, your privacy, and the fruit of your labor. Liberty means living your life the way you want to as long as you don’t hurt other people. It means setting a good example is a far better way to spread ideals than through force of arms. It means aspiring towards a more free society, where individual rights are held in the highest esteem and the rejection of the initiation of force. It means profits that are honestly earned through voluntary exchange add value to the world while profits gained by violating the property rights of others through theft, pollution, or government bailouts and subsidies do not. And it means the rejection of wireless wiretaps, indefinite detention of US citizens and assassination of US citizens without due process.
Ron Paul may not win the presidency, but that doesnt mean the quirky, didactic, old man can’t have a profound effect on American society when it comes to government debt, fiat currencies, the Drug War, the Federal Reserve, endless overseas wars, civil liberties and the militarization of the US police force. Whether its outlawing the selling of raw milk, sugary drinks in school, or the ridiculous Los Angeles city council today voting to require all adult film actors to wear condoms people are getting sick of an overbearing, bankrupt nanny state.
Posted by: John Vindex | January 18, 2012, 3:46 am 3:46 am
Why did they even let Rick Perry into the debate? Fox didn’t let Ron Paul into the 2008 debates citing his less than 10% showing in Iowa. Rick Perry had less than 1% in NH! Get him out of there. In fact, just let Ron and Mitt duke it out. Get it together Fox. You are losing viewers.
Posted by: Ron Smith | January 18, 2012, 3:47 am 3:47 am
Veterans for Ron Paul 2012 !
Goldman Sachs & Bank of America for Romney & Obama.
Wake up baby boomers ! It is time to learn how to use the internet to research for the truth, and stop letting the main stream media spoon feed you lies & propaganda. Our future depends on it.
Posted by: Ryan | January 18, 2012, 3:49 am 3:49 am
It still amazes me how many brainwashed Americans are still out there…..Korea….Vietnam…Iraq….Iraq again…Afghanistan…Libya….and there are still clueless boobs who ‘boo’ Ron Paul for wanting to stop the nation-building, resource-confiscating, innocent military and foreign murdering wars. Those idiots are afraid of Iran??!! Are you serious!?!? The only nation any country in this world needs to fear is the United States….we have over 900 bases in 130 countries and there are still idiot Americans afraid of those big bad terrorists from Iran?!?!? As Ron Paul says, “You never hear about terrorists targeting Norway or Sweden.” Why is that…..because they mind their own damn business!! Those neo-con warmongers booing Ron Paul for his anti-war stance should strap on themselves and their children an AK-47 and march to the frontline of the next war the ruling elites start! You idiots….you think Mitt and Newt and Rick and Perry and their kids and their ‘controllers’ are going to be on that frontline?? WAKE THE HELL UP YOU CLUELESS BOOBS!! They take the money and resources and laugh you idiots supporting and paying for these illegal and unconstitutional wars!! Ron Paul has been educating Americans for 30 years on who rules this country and how we need to return the power to the people!! But you boneheads still choose to be brainwashed by the controllers….your inability to utilize your brain sickens me!!
Posted by: WAKEUP | January 18, 2012, 3:57 am 3:57 am
1) Paul has worked to crack down on the Federal Reserve which is directly responsible for the U.S. debt, the perpetual deficits, and the advancement of the welfare/warfare state.
2) Paul is against the NDAA and the right of the Federal government to indefinitely detain US citizens without due process and strip citizens of legal protections based on its sole discretion
3) Paul is against SOPA, the so-called online piracy act but actually an Internet death penalty that allows the Attorney General to disappear websites
4) Paul voted against the Patriot Act including warrantless surveillance and forcing companies to turn over information on citizens’ finances, communications and associations
5) Paul is against the Obama administration’s use GPS devices to monitor every move of targeted citizens without securing any court order or review
6) Paul believes the 50 states should be laboratories for democracy. If a state wants to legalize drugs, prostitution or gay marraige, it should be up to the people of that state and not the Federal government
7) Paul is against the right of Obama or any president to assassinate US citizens without due process
8) Paul wants to cut the Pentagon budget by $1 trillion.
9) Paul wants to decriminalize marijuana and to dial back the worst excesses of the failed, trillion dollar drug war.
10) Paul has consistently opposed free-trade deals that have led to massive layoffs and factory closings in the United States
Posted by: John Vindex | January 18, 2012, 4:15 am 4:15 am
Read what WAKEUP $aid and give it $ome $erious thought. I cannot ad or take away from anything he just $tated. One of my elders recently $aid “Thi$ country will elect the candidate it de$erve$!”
200+ nukes in I$rael, they are our friend$, they are professional$, let them take care of it! That’$ the most $en$ible and co$t effective idea I’ve heard yet!
YOU cannot afford to $tart another war!!! Would you be willing to “do your part” and mortgage or lose your house to pay for the next war? Becau$e that’s what it just may come down to.
Imagine that! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!! Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: Rick Obomney | January 18, 2012, 4:22 am 4:22 am
We,, we know form prior articles by Jason he is as biased as they come. No wonder why this is another biased article. E.G. “Paul’s willingness to stand up for what he believes in when it comes to U.S. involvement in foreign countries hurt him repeatedly in Monday’s debate.” Really? There was one boo, and it turned into cheers after he explained himself. But that doesn’t fall in line with ABC’s strategy, which is to destroy liberty by any means necessary.
Posted by: brian | January 18, 2012, 4:55 am 4:55 am
Fortunately, most Folks are realizing that this idiot has no blazing idea how U.S. Foreign Policy should be handled–which precludes him from being a SERIOUS candidate.
There IS NO MORAL EQUIVALENT for allowing radical nations such as IRAN, VENEZUELA, HATI … to possess NUCLEAR ARMS–just because other nations have them. YOU DO NOT GIVE A MAD-MAN THE TOOL TO DESTROY HIS NEIGHBORS–JUST SO YOU CAN SAY “Everyone’s equal now!”
Ron Paul’s taped statement that he WOULD NOT HAVE HAD BIN LADEN KILLED–is another example of his total lack of understanding of the real world.
He has no respect for Abraham Lincoln, Reagan, etc., and believes that TODAY’S capitalist system is backwards. It was bad enough for Obama to withdrawl all troops from Iraq/Afghanistan–JUST FOR POLITICAL REASONS. Mr. Paul would remove troops FROM ALL REGIONS OF THE WORLD–OUT OF BLIND PHILOSOPHY AND FAITH IN HIS OWN MANTRA–which is entirely flawed.
Posted by: Brett Yollis | January 18, 2012, 4:57 am 4:57 am
It was a hand picked Fox News crowd. Of course they’ll boo a peace message.
Posted by: Gino | January 18, 2012, 4:57 am 4:57 am
I will vote for Ron Paul.
Newt Gingrich is a joke………………no way for him.
Posted by: AL | January 18, 2012, 5:14 am 5:14 am
The only real choice, if it’s not Ron Paul, is which big government deficit spender you want presiding over the economy (whose party will be completely blamed for it), when it all implodes. I would rather it be the liberal who makes no bones about being a big trillions of dollars of debt/deficit spending liberal, than someone the public mistakes (like Bush was mistaken), for being a so-called “conservative”. It is because of that I would hope that Ron Paul runs independently, on principle and not party, as always – even if it spoils the hopes of so-called “conservatives”.
Posted by: Steven Douglas | January 18, 2012, 5:32 am 5:32 am
No thinking person can actually be so blind as to not see that if every other “candidate” only thinly proposes something a little different here and there, that they are working for the same team ! Democrat, Republican, Conservative, Liberal, yet they are are selling you the same pot of crap stew.
One guy comes out and proposes we radically change our course which we all know has failed, continues to fail, and will continue to fail until there is no defense agaist the enemies that are WITHIN our borders being controlled from outside our borders.
If we don’t return to the priciples on which this country was founded it won’t be OUR country for much longer.
War is wrong and should only EVER be used in defense. Not one person has the right to claim Christianity that claims otherwise. Booing Matt 7:12 probably sounded alot like the crowd screaming to let Barabas go free and crucify Jesus.
This isn’t a popularity contest. We are at apivotal moment in history. Right is right even if every one is against it. Wrong is wrong even if everyone is for it.
Do the right thing. Vote for the one who is not an obvious bought and paid for LIAR!
Posted by: Kurt | January 18, 2012, 5:33 am 5:33 am
The fact that the Golden Rule got booed tells you all you need to know about the sincerity of GOP ‘Christians.’
Posted by: jacksingularity | January 18, 2012, 5:33 am 5:33 am
LOL! …. Paul will never be elected as a Republican. HE’S RUNNING UNDER THE WRONG PARTY FOLKS! … and his C-R-E-T-_-N followers will never understand that.
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | January 18, 2012, 5:39 am 5:39 am
Ron Paul adopts the golden rule when it comes to foreign policy, and people boo! Seems like most adopt a different biblical principal..”spare the rod spoil the child”. Problem is IRAN is NOT a child..it is a sovereign nation. If we or they can’t play nice, let our gov ignore them..but let our companies do business..why? If you recall, their rebellion was easily squashed. You think it would have been the case if they had access to military contractors?
Posted by: Robert I | January 18, 2012, 5:44 am 5:44 am
The people that booed Ron Paul were paid to do so. Fox had people planted in the entire arena.
It is literally acting and smoke and mirrors like pro wrestling. You say Ron Paul was hurt because people watched paid actors boo biblical scripture. “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, Jesus said as the crowd says boooo.
Posted by: Matt | January 18, 2012, 5:51 am 5:51 am
pffft, golden rules are for idiots. We need flip floppers, the usurpation of rights and the desecration of the constitution.
What the hell is this Ron Paul guy thinking?
Posted by: Sam Geoghegan | January 18, 2012, 5:52 am 5:52 am
Dear Presstitutes, “there you go again”. Playing along with the Chickenhawk Warmongers and Military Industrial Complex…you’ve lost ALL CREDIBILITY with viewers and advertisers packing their bags and heading towards to doors.
It’s OK, you can all become the next judges on “Dancing with The Stars” or Daytime Talk…where good journalism went to die.
Cheers!
RON PAUL 2012
Posted by: truthwillsetyoufree | January 18, 2012, 5:56 am 5:56 am
The neoconservative principle of “unipolarity” means that the United States must remain the one and only world super power. Balance of power is a bad word to the GOP. This means that the US has to be at perpetual war to achieve this goal. Basically the neoconservatives would have the United States at war with the entire world for as long as we can keep bullying other countries. Any history text book I have ever read shows that nations that behave like this lose big time in the end. Happened to Germany twice. Happened to Alexander the Great (who lost in Afghanistan). Happened to the former Soviet Union (who also lost in Afghanistan). If we keep this up, we will be to China what the Soviet Union was to us. And yet everyone will act so surprised when we collapse for making the same stupid mistakes.
Posted by: The Good Twin | January 18, 2012, 6:02 am 6:02 am
I know Jason, I went to school with him. High school. He was the ” I want to be in the front of the line kind of kid” a true putz.
Jason liked this girl Melisa and she did not like him. He sat and conspired a way that made it look like she cheated our test but in fact it was he that was cheating. It was not an important test, but It kind of give’s you an ideal of the level he would stoop to at 16 years old.
The girl was devastated and this little punk started laughing in the lunch room at her. Two cheerleaders walked up to him and kicked him right the balls! He did not even flinch…..moral of my story is not the girls getting even, but Jason has no balls.
Posted by: Michael Hershkowitz | January 18, 2012, 6:12 am 6:12 am
The majority of the crowd was “pre-selected” in a lottery rather than just allowing the public in to hear the debate. Americans who depend on the MSM for coverage of the candidates only hear what the network chooses for them to hear. The MSM won’t tell you we had Bin Ladin on several occasions, the most publicized being Tora Bora, and our troops were told to stand down,allowing him to escape into Pakistan . This is from the head of the CIA Bin Ladin Unit. Dr. Paul’s position was if we let him go for ten years so we could wage a war on the region and clean up some of the mess we created over the last forty years, why not just capture him and question him rather than some dramatic raid to pump up the current administration. Bin Ladin was our creation…we supported him with training and weapons when Russia invaded Afghanistan. The uninformed don’t grasp this concept. The public is starting to wake up…they understand that our country is broke and this is going to end very badly for everyone, except maybe the wealthy. Our national debt is unsustainable. If you enjoy $4. gasoline and $5. gallons of milk, just wait and see what happens. Like the frog in a slowly boiling pot of water…it’s almost too late….
Posted by: He_SCORES | January 18, 2012, 6:18 am 6:18 am
Pfft. This is how GOP and Christians and Southerners behave?
Nothing says “come see our beautiful beaches and enjoy our hospitality” like booing the golden rule. Disgusting circus FOX and South Carolina.
America is played out.
Posted by: huck | January 18, 2012, 6:18 am 6:18 am
@Brett Yollis….
Moral? Moral??? What is moral in STARTING a war? (Iraq OR IRan). Do you let your kid go beat the sheesh out of the neighbor kid b/c of a verbal threat or even blatantly obvious intent? What gives? Further, what did the Taliban do to us? Osama was the target. Did you know that the Taliban offered to give Osama up to a neutral country for trial, but Bush refused? Why? Did you know that Ron Paul authored a bill for the letters of marque and reprisal (As outlined in the Constitution) so our Special Ops boys could go in and capture him (instead of a ground invasion). And look….ten years later it STILL took a special ops team, in a country we are not officially at war with, to get Osama. What, exactly, is moral about the way things went down the last 10 years?? Our careless vengeance (seeking justice by immoral means) has led to untold numbers of deaths of men, women, and children. War, itself, is a SERIOUS MORAL ISSUE.
Once upon a time we had a policy of ARMED NEUTRALITY (non-interventionism). Once upon a time Christians believed in strictly defensive war-fare (let alone, the golden rule). Once upon a time our founding fathers engaged in DIPLOMACY to bring about a peaceful end to our grievances with King George. Once upon a time Andrew Jackson fought the redcoats ON OUR CONTINENT to throw off a TYRANT.
235 years later, we’ve eschewed all of that. We think we need to ‘go over there’ to defend our freedoms here. Yet, in the last ten years we’ve seen our elected officials (the same ones who led us into and maintain these wars ‘to preserve our freedom’) mount a massive assault on our Bill of Rights, specifically, the 1st, 4th, and 6th (MCA, Patriot, NDAA, TSA). While many criticize Ron Paul’s domestic proposals as turning back the clock 100 years, audience members CHEERED when Romney/Obama turned back the clock 800 years by supporting the NDAA (indefinite detention clause). Our basic freedoms are not under threat from the middle east….It’s happening HERE! The politicians who sent us there are having the last laugh. WAKE UP AMERICA!!
Posted by: Lin J. | January 18, 2012, 6:20 am 6:20 am
Hello Huck @6:18am. Well written!
Posted by: Garry | January 18, 2012, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Only sociopaths boo “the golden rule”.
Actually not being able to understand the golden rule, in other words not being able to empathize is the definition of the mental disorder called sociopathy.
Posted by: Kerem Tibuk | January 18, 2012, 6:56 am 6:56 am
the only boos were from half wit neocon failures , as the bible said, they kno not what they do. Ron Paul 2012 , last chance this nation has
Posted by: JT | January 18, 2012, 7:14 am 7:14 am
Of course South Carolina booed the Golden Rule. Just as South Carolina’s representative Joe Wilson shouted out “Liar” to the President and then was lauded by his constituents, it’s a rude and crude state full of hate-filled Christians that is falsely known for its good manners.
Posted by: JDavis | January 18, 2012, 7:20 am 7:20 am
Well Ron Paul had the best support in not dodging the questions asked of him online. He didn’t once fall into the negative and was off the charts in the positive but they didn’t show that on Fox. Instead they show Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Perry. Who cares if he got booed by some of the people in the audience. I expect that from war loving hypocrites like that. Soon the time will come when it is undeniable that the Wars are a plague on our society and those people who love war so much – are eventually going to get gunned down including the media who profit from the stories.
Posted by: Daniel A P | January 18, 2012, 7:39 am 7:39 am
The US is the only nation that was dangerous and irresponsible enough to use nuclear weapons on another nation. Does that make us a “rogue” nation, like Iran?
Posted by: Brett | January 18, 2012, 7:46 am 7:46 am
For you conservative Christians that believe God’s word:
Proverbs 16:7
7 When people’s lives please the LORD,
even their enemies are at peace with them.
If we live like Jesus and do unto others as we would have others do unto us, then perhaps the Lords promise in Proverbs would be true.
Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: LenGrady75 | January 18, 2012, 7:50 am 7:50 am
I love this line from the ‘news article’, “Paul’s willingness to stand up for what he believes in when it comes to U.S. involvement in foreign countries hurt him repeatedly in Monday’s debate.”
According to whom? As far as I know, in the ‘real world’ our Millitary men and women are the largest supporters of Ron Paul. Additionally, Americans are sick of losing their sons and daughters to causes that benefit only Congress and the Banking Cartels.
Posted by: Jacob Glass | January 18, 2012, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Exactly why I admire Ron Paul — he has cajones! What other politician will stand in front of a hostile audience and tell them the truth? Or even tell them the truth as he sees it?
Posted by: Ron | January 18, 2012, 8:17 am 8:17 am
It is amazing, a room full of “Christians” booing at Ron Paul when he spoke about peace is sad and proves how bad and corrupt not only this country is but religion. Everytime Mitt Romney and the other GOP candidates would say “I’d kill them” the crowd would cheer, that should have been more news than Ron Paul’s words of piece.
Posted by: Diana | January 18, 2012, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Ron Paul Coalition will not vote for Willard Mittens the Romney Robot
Three other candidates will not even be on the ballot in several states
Santorum
Gingrich
R Perry
Posted by: NadePaulKuciGravMcKi | January 18, 2012, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Why boo and reject one of Christ’s principal philosophies just because it was uttered in reference to the relationship between nations and not just between individuals? Does the same principal not apply? Would they have bood Christ if He had been the one standing before them saying it? Undoubtedly they would unfortunately, just like the pharisees of His day did. What’s wrong with seeking a peaceful solution first? What’s wrong with respecting the sovereignty of other nations in the same way that we demand they respect our national sovereignty? Why should we have hundreds of military bases in about 130 other countries when we all know that Americans would never stand for another nation putting a military base on our soil? What’s wrong with wanting to restore our constitutional republic to limited government with a strong national DEFENSE instead of continuing to grow our vast military empire that we can’t afford? These are all Ron Paul’s positions. They are consistent with the constitution and with the biblical principals that conservatives used to claim to honor before they booed them.
Posted by: Brett | January 18, 2012, 8:24 am 8:24 am
The Internet (us) won, mainstream media died. Long live freedom, America, and Ron Paul!
Posted by: paco balko | January 18, 2012, 8:27 am 8:27 am
I heard Jesus Christ got up and walked out of the debate after hearing so called Christians booing.
Posted by: Dave | January 18, 2012, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Hello ALL
The war mongers are milking us from all the sides……
Think Oil price with Saddam+ Gaddafi+Mohamadinijad =10 dollars a barrel.
Oil price without Saddam (average is about 70 dollars per barrel…)
Oil price without Saddam+ Gaddaffi= 100 dollars a barrel…
Oil price without Ahmednijad—–> 250 dollars a barrel…
These GOP and Obama war mongers are using your shoulders to fire their weapons on our back…
WAKE UP…
RON PAUL is our only chance…..
There is no threat from IRAN or IRAQ or any place except from within…We need to be more cautious about our enemies within than far away places..These politicians will make us bleed from our udders after milking us from all the sides as their thirst will never be over…
The people who BOOED RON PAUL were people from the OIL+MILITARY+BANKING war mongers….don’t get swayed by them…
VOTE for PRINCIPLES….
VOTE for PEACE..
VOTE for LIFE…
VOTE for Values not person and values today = RON PAUL
VOTE for RON PAUL….
Posted by: Raaj | January 18, 2012, 8:30 am 8:30 am
This is not “News” it’s history! LAZY REGURGITATION. The morons booed Dr Paul’s mention of the Golden Rule. It was a Farce News Contrived Event. Ironically, Dr Paul was cheered at the end of his statement, despite the fact he never went off message. A PLANTED Audience, no doubt.
Dems and Reps, different pages from the same bad book.
Posted by: Mike Parent | January 18, 2012, 8:38 am 8:38 am
I find it funny how many stories I read with a headline indicating Paul got booed, as if it was somehow justified. Instead, the media should start running stories about the idiocy of the people that booed him and the blatant war mongering everyone other GOP candidate is proposing.
Oh wait, I forgot – if there aren’t wars, then the media doesn’t get the same ratings they so desperately crave.
Posted by: RCS | January 18, 2012, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Looks like Dr. Paul is a going to be teflon president like Ronald Reagan. The more his critics try to demolish him the stronger he gets and more concrete his support gets.
Posted by: Girish | January 18, 2012, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Like most Ron Paul supporters, I will write in Dr. Paul if I have to. a vote for anyone else will be just the status quo. If they do not heed his warnings, this country will taken over by a powerful world oligarchy that will bring us to a violent civil war. The military overwhelming supports Dr. Paul and will turn on this oligarchy’s NDAA efforts. The people will not take much more of this and the numbers are growing. NEVER, say never.
Posted by: Gerald | January 18, 2012, 9:07 am 9:07 am
If Ron Paul had not raised these issues, the primary debate process would be dominated by the shallowest of rhetoric. I am voting for Ron Paul during the primaries, and regardless of who ultimately gets the nomination, it is critical in the name of stopping the two-party central government insanity by giving Paul as many delegates to the national convention as possible! I cannot vote in the general election for Governor Romney or President Obama. I can’t. I will be taking a good look at the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party nominees.
Posted by: Darryl Schmitz | January 18, 2012, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Obama is a proven failure.
I’m voting for ABO.
All of the candidates in the debate meet that criteria.
Whoever is the Repub nominee will be the next President.
Posted by: Noz | January 18, 2012, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Ron Paul is not hurt by his commitment to his convictions–he is strengthened!
Posted by: Rick Overman | January 18, 2012, 9:18 am 9:18 am
The motives for the 911 attacks based have been explicitly detailed by both the attackers and US defense agencies. The motive was also reported by the FBI and CIA and multiple other agencies. The fact is US foreign policy causes this blow-back and Americans need to understand that or they will continue to be at risk for future attacks. There is no excuse to be uninformed with vast amounts of information out there. Here are the general motives :
1. US support for dictators in the region (from the Saudi ‘royal’ family to the previous leader in Egypt Mubarak).
2. Support for Israel and their persecution of the Palestinians.
3. Intervention and occupation of Muslim countries.
Whether you believe it or not these are the perceived grievances that caused the blow back of 911. Americans have access to this information and the freedom to be educated on these issues. When I heard the booing in SC it was out of ignorance and politics. Also, the MSM parrots the lie about it being about our ever diminishing ‘freedoms’ in this country. Sorry, OBL did not attack us because I drink beer or our women have the freedom to work outside the house.
Michael Shuerer who lead the CIAs Bin Laden Unit agrees with Dr. Paul so why would anyone believe a political hack like Newt Gingirch on Middle East policy? or any of these neocons for that matter. Read some interview with CIA man Michael Shuerer and get educated people.
Posted by: GeorgeJackson | January 18, 2012, 9:27 am 9:27 am
i just know that ron paul is not a hypocrite and his performance and presence exposes hypocrisy and ignorance and that hypocrisy and ignorance came forth to be exposed through that public forum.
Posted by: roman | January 18, 2012, 9:31 am 9:31 am
To the writer of this article, Ron Paul clearly won this debate. You should consider yourself a disgrace to the field of journalism. At least report the facts. Paul got a lot of good support throughout the night and clearly won this debate. Your article makes it seems if all he received was boos. ABC should stop distorting the news and report the truth. The American people are starting to see thru your shenanigans. Ron Paul is clearly an electable candidate and a frontrunner in the Republican nomination.
Posted by: Khary | January 18, 2012, 9:38 am 9:38 am
It most certainly did not “hurt him repeatedly.” It showed him to be the man we support wholeheartedly: Principled, Consistent, and Honest. He exposed the warmongering Christian Right for what they are: bloodthirsty, big-government, hypocrites.
Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies – Ron Paul
Ron Paul 2012! Restore the Constitution! Restore the Republic!
Posted by: belle | January 18, 2012, 9:42 am 9:42 am
“…the Federal Reserve which is directly responsible for the U.S. debt, the perpetual deficits, and the advancement of the welfare/warfare state.”
This is absolute nonsense. There is not a shred of evidence to support it and a massive amount of data to refute it.
Posted by: A. D. DiSorda | January 18, 2012, 9:42 am 9:42 am
When will the media state properly that Ron Paul is the Conservative on foreign policy and the war and fear mongers are liberal/progressives of the Teddy Roosevelt wing of the party?
Posted by: LongPaulTexan | January 18, 2012, 9:45 am 9:45 am
They booed the candidate arguing for peace and they cheered the candidate who said “just kill them”. In my head I keep hearing “BARABBAS, WE WANT BARABBAS!!!” It’s amazing how people who call themselves christian fail to recognize this.
Posted by: sovereign | January 18, 2012, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Bloodthirsty Christian warmongers booing the Bible might be an all time low in the history of American politics. Neocon Bible-thumpers like Jesus Christ…except for his kooky foreign policy.
To exemplify the stupidity of the South Carolina audience (the same state that nominated Alvin Greene and repeatedly elects Lindsay Graham), they roundly cheered Newt’s reference to Andrew Jackson killing the enemy. The same Andrew Jackson that threatened to hang the people of South Carolina if they dared to oppose any policy of the United States.
In fairness to South Carolina, though, the audience was preselected.
As for ankle-biter Rick Perry, he has already been gonged by the voters in every state he has campaigned.
Posted by: J.A. Topfke | January 18, 2012, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I don’t understand why it hurt him. Because a few blood-thirsty warmongers in the fox news audience booed? This is not representative of all Republicans, otherwise Ron Paul wouldn’t be getting 25%, or 20% in SC.
Posted by: BooBoo | January 18, 2012, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Okay, Ron Paul certainly has his pluses but what I’m not reading from his supporters is Ron Paul’s stance on the Department of the Interior. Small point to some of you but for those of us who enjoy camping, hiking, fishing and hunting this point is far from moot. Consider this if Ron Paul gets into the White House, if he is elected he will remove the Department of the Interior which will force YOUR National Parks and historic landmarks into privatization which in latent terms means private developers will own your National Parks. Places like Yellow Stone, Yosimite, Gettysburg, Rocky Mountain National Park, The Smokey Mountain National Park, The Appalachian Trail and hundreds of other natural places which America has treasured and honored for over a century. Surely there are thosands of other items, programs and pork spending allotments he could remove but this is not the case. Remember, it is not what he says that makes him unelectable but what he stands against like immigration reform and does not go into detail about that makes him dangerous for our Presidency.
Posted by: Pete | January 18, 2012, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Boooboo: Your just making the assumption that those landmarks would be privatized. Considering that the land is government property, it would go to the state government, which you may not know, already controls the majority of state owned parks in the U.S. and maintains them. And just because the department of the interior is phased out, does not mean we would have instability in our park system.
I enjoy a clean environment and if we really do care about our parks and natural wildlife, we will fight for it, but if we elect Obama or Mittens, we would have the DFAA come in and arrest us permanently without trial for simply doing the right thing, that my friend just weighs more.
Think outside the box.
Posted by: Ron Paul is Right. | January 18, 2012, 10:50 am 10:50 am
This debate was just a preview of how far Rupert Murdoch (owner of Fox 8 news), and his business associates (The Rothschilds: majority owners of the Federal reserve) are willing to go to squash the Ron Paul movement. Look at how they are using their Wall street banking firms:(Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barklays and others to finance The Romney campaign as well as the Obama campaign using bail out money. These people are capable of just about anything. If you care about our country you should donate all you can to the Ron Paul campaign. It is your last chance to buy your freedom back.
Posted by: Robert Stehli | January 18, 2012, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Thanks for the many, many well-thought-out and well-written responses in support of Ron Paul. Who says he was hurt by the booing (of one or very few)? What will hurt him is the selfishness and ignorance of those who refuse to see how they are manipulated over and over again by the un-free press and by the huge amounts of money backing the candidates of divisiveness and hatred. The nasty grin on Newt Gingrich’s face during Paul’s comments says it all–no respect, no rational thought, no concern for our country or its citizens. I was, and still am, a huge supporter of Jimmy Carter, the man. He didn’t want to play the Washington game, and was sabotaged for it. I wonder whether Ron Paul, if elected, would succeed any better at bringing moral and ethical thought to the decisions made in Washington, but that’s no reason not to give him a chance. I am just so sickened by the constant barrage of objectionable language and revelations about most of the available candidates, and can’t imagine why anyone would vote for them. They lie, they cheat, they swindle, and still the voters line up. I voted for Obama, and while I am disappointed by some of the decisions he’s made, I believe he’s a good, decent man. I would vote for him or Ron Paul.
Posted by: Sharon (Osborne) | January 18, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: ‘It is mine to avenge; I will repay,’ says the Lord. On the contrary: If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink. In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head. Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good” – Romans 12:17-21.
Posted by: Brett | January 18, 2012, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Why do the snipets of video ‘portray’ the booing as being prevalent, when Paul (his responses was cheered 80% of the time?
Posted by: deanbob | January 18, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
he is not going to sell national landmarks, private businesses would provide the security, etc
Posted by: ilevy | January 18, 2012, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Except for Ron Paul, this is what the Republican Party (including its mouthpiece Fox News) has become:
1. the party of nation-building and pre-emptive intervention
2. the party of big government and big military, i.e., empire
3. the party supporting unsound monetary policy (it once promised to never leave a gold standard)
4. it gives lip service to family values and pro-life (maybe this isn’t the federal govt’s role anyway)
5. it has contributed as more to the national debt than the other party in the past 40 years
6. it no longer represents conservatives
The fire breathers of SC like that federal funds flow through military bases to their economy. What is it about SC that likes to go to war so quickly?
I’m an independent who doesn’t hold the Democrat party in high regard either.
Posted by: prov227 | January 18, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am
POSTED BY: MATT | JANUARY 18, 2012, 5:51 AM 5:51 AM, are you getting scared, to make claims like that. Your just like any other liberal throw something out and hope that it sticks. Its not like the Obama campaign coaxed people and children what to say and ask.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 18, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Conservative christians LOVE war. They believe in an eternal crusade to convert the planet. How is this different from islamic jihad? It is no different.
Boo-ing the golden rule is essentially boo-ing the teachings of Jesus Christ. What an embarassment, but then again, the Carolinas have always been an embarassment.
Posted by: Rick | January 18, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
The media is continuing to push forward the idea that he was ONLY booed for his message about the Golden Rule. For those that actually have seen that debate, they will know that Dr. Paul spoke in one breath, through the first boos, and when he got to his main point that we must stop the war-mongering, nation building and world policing, to bring out troops home, a big part of the audience erupted into applause. His speech that was booed, ended with applause! Tell the whole story, please.
Posted by: crawford jennings | January 18, 2012, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
I think it is very telling that the “good Christian” folks in South Carolina booed the golden rule. Jesus would be proud…
Posted by: Sam Marcum | January 18, 2012, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Here are my thoughts on Ron Paul. God / the Universe/ the Creator/who ever is that higher authority for you (for me it is Christ Jesus- but I respect all other thoughts) is providing an opportunity for this nation to take responsibility for what We have created here in this nation and aboard. If we do not take responsibility for these actions, than we are going to experience the affect of those actions and the results will be cast down on us. What would those things be that come – exaclty what Ron Paul is telling us is coming, just like he did in 2003 with the Housing Bubble (or is that 1993 or 1983(. If this nation Bos at the Golden rule like they did in South Carolina, my fellow American, be prepared for what follows next. Our actions are not without repercussions. We have the Responsibility, no one else does.
Posted by: PaulSMich | January 18, 2012, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
When they boo Ron Paul on foreign Policy the are really booing the troops. The troops contribute more than double to him then they do all the other candidates COMBINED.If his foreign policy is good enough for them then it should be good for everybody else! support the troops and support Ron Paul.
Posted by: LF | January 18, 2012, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Neoconservatives and so-called “Christian” conservatives prefer the following Golden Rule:
Do one to others before they do one to you.
If Jesus came back tomorrow, these would be the first group he’d likely call out for their rampant hypocrisy.
Posted by: Opino1984 | January 18, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
If Ron Paul is not elected to serve the next four years, as president, I will no longer wish to live in this country.
In fear of what is to come my last hope, for this country, is in the hands of Ron Paul.
Your only hope for a true democracy is in the hands on Ron Paul.
Posted by: Aaron | January 18, 2012, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Our corporate-overlord owned media wants you to believe this, “Paul’s willingness to stand up for what he believes in when it comes to U.S. involvement in foreign countries hurt him repeatedly in Monday’s debate.” To me, it’s another reason I’m voting for Dr. Paul. The other candidates will only stand up for what they believe will get them elected. Then they’ll do what their plutocrat owners tell them to. The super-rich have purchased the best government money can buy, and it’s a big one. I’ve read that 59% of “New Hampshire’s GOP voters think Romney is the candidate most likely to beat Obama.” That’s funny. Romney is the candidate most LIKE Obama. We’re getting distracted. The last thing Barack Obama did in 2011 was sign a bill that eliminates due process for anyone suspected of terrorism in America. Did we wake up in Stalin’s Russia in 2012? Which of the candidates would never have signed that bill? We need someone in office who will take our country back to where it should be, guided by the principles of the constitution. Not people who are taking our tax dollars to build empires. If you’re a conservative, vote for Ron Paul. He’s the only GOP candidate who really stands for lower taxes and less government. The rest are paying lip service to get elected. If you’re a liberal, like myself, vote for Ron Paul. He’s the only one who really would get us out of all of the insane foreign entanglements, and keep the government in check when it comes to our civil liberties. I’m a liberal for liberty! It’s time we vote our conscious, instead of voting for “my guy who is the only one who stands a chance of beating your guy.” Ron Paul 2012!
Posted by: John Hanson | January 18, 2012, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
A Christian saying “I like Ron Paul except for his foreign policy” is like saying “I like Jesus except for the whole ‘Love your Neighbor’ part”. Gimmie a break.
Posted by: evan | January 18, 2012, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I dislike not being able to thumbs up my fellow RP supporters. You all have some great comments!
I will just add that Romney’s just been thrown a major curve ball with McCain’s Opposition Book on Romney (from the 2008 campaign, recently revealed on the internet). Enjoy googling!
Posted by: Mary | January 18, 2012, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
It’s interesting that none of the mainstream media went out of their way to let everyone on the planet know that Romney was also bood for supporting NDAA.
Posted by: Dave | January 18, 2012, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
More proof that our corporate-overlord owned media does not want Dr. Paul to be elected, a prior poster wrote: “Dr. Paul spoke in one breath, through the first boos, and when he got to his main point that we must stop the war-mongering, nation building and world policing, to bring out troops home, a big part of the audience erupted into applause. His speech that was booed, ended with applause! Tell the whole story, please.” Our corporate-overlord-owned media keeps trying to make out that Paul is unpopular, when that is a total falsehood. There are several polls that show the he has the same chance of beating Obama as Romney. I would love to see a Paul-Obama debate. Romney vs. Obama, yawn, more of the same.
Posted by: John Hanson | January 18, 2012, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I have been reading the 200 page mitt file from the mccain 08 campaign. There is a lot of stuff in there for Republicans to be worried about. Some of it makes sense when you look at it logically. I was happy to see Lawrence O’donnell come to back up ron paul from the stupid AP story about first-class flights. Also the New York times had to come out and apologize for keeping the Ron Paul campaign in low profile in the news.
Only one man is solid in his voting history, personal life, and constitutional stance. Ron Paul. That is what it takes to win elections. Mitt Romney might be popular in the news, but this 200 page report should be enough to get voters to wake up and start looking at candidate’s records.
Posted by: Nick | January 18, 2012, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
You have to give the booing people a pass in this case as they are from South Carolina, a state not exactly noted for its intelligent residents.
Posted by: Archie1954 | January 18, 2012, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
@Brett Yollis Now Haiti and Venezuela are going to have nuclear weapons? You chickenhawks can’t even deal with reality, but we’re going to let you decide foreign policy?
Posted by: Woody | January 18, 2012, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
It has been said already but I will say it again…booing the golden rule? really? how sad. These are the “Christian” conservatives of the republican party? Do they not know who gave us the golden rule? Please, if you are Christian (or anything else) and believe in peace, hear Ron Paul out, do the research yourself away from the mainstream propaganda.
Posted by: Dan | January 18, 2012, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Those paid to boo Ron Paul should be ashamed.
Posted by: dusterdog | January 18, 2012, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I think the media should be sued fo discrimination. The say Ron Paul isn’t electable when he has be elected 12 times.
Posted by: JV | January 18, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Fox hand-selected their audience.
4 South Carolina Senators have endorsed him, 3 did so after the debate. Military members and veterans are some of Ron’s biggest supporters.
Posted by: Jacque | January 18, 2012, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Mr. Volack,
Did you even watch the debate yourself?
Funny that you didn’t report that only a partial male section of the audience booed Mr. Paul.
***Funny that you didn’t report on the LONGER and louder crowd boo of Mitt Romney later in the debate.***
Funny that you didn’t report on the several times the same audience cheered Ron Paul.
Your omissions of these key details demonstrate that you are neither fair nor balanced, but simply a lapdog hack.
Also, what is this ridiculous notion that the boos of a few partisan individuals who reserved seats in advance for a very selective event get to represent a meaningful position within the broader electorate. They don’t and to very selectively – as AGAIN you did not cover the boos of Mitt Romney’s comments – place such trivial happenings in major headlines is an epic failure of serious journalism.
- Leftist, voting in this particular election for Ron Paul
Posted by: XX | January 18, 2012, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Everytime I hear someone bashing Ron Paul it’s the same format. Say he is unelectable, trash his foreign policy, justify endless war…rinse & repeat. However I only hear about 1% of the people bashing him, and about 75% screaming his name with reverence. I’m not sure if you are just a hateful person, or you were paid to support Romney. We do know that Mitt Romney has received more campaign contributions from PACs/lobbyist than all other candidates and the President combined. I suppose when you throw billions at a campaign you can buy some support, but then who would support the president?
Posted by: Casey | January 18, 2012, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Voters who want wars, torture, assassinations, “humanitarian” bombings in oil rich countries, indefinite detentions, drone attacks that kill the innocent, erosion of civil liberties, domestic war on the people (drug war), out-of-control debt and spending, graft and greed, crony capitalism, pandering to special interests, bailouts, more of the same, must NOT vote for Ron Paul.
Voters who want peace, a humane foreign policy, restoration of civil liberties, an end to the war on drugs, sound money, balanced budgets, honesty, integrity and transparency in government, and a President wholly committed to Constitutional government can vote for Ron Paul.
Ain’t that difficult a choice.
Posted by: jonathan | January 19, 2012, 1:59 am 1:59 am
What’s wrong with some of you people? Seriously you’re going to judge Christians and EVERYONE who votes Republican by how a few paid-off people conduct themselves during a debate? Shame on you. I’m a conservative, Christian, and Republican. We’re not warmongers or peace haters. Just like not all Democrats are lying hypocrites because of the recent actions of our dear President.
Posted by: Esteban | January 19, 2012, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Usa news is a joke!usa debates are a joke!The world laughs at the Usa!keep up the good work!
Posted by: rick | January 19, 2012, 9:56 am 9:56 am
In the World of the establishment minions, “might is right.”
Truth and justice do NOT exist in that place.
It’s no wonder they don’t recognize RP.
“mainstream media” (ha! an oxymoron) is just a tool for the mighty. Too many people have awakened though and see through the eye rolls, appeals to what everyone else thinks (as if these clowns know or care), slights and nasty name calling against anyone who speaks truth. Truth hurts, so they attack and keep on keeping on with their games to control the masses.
Posted by: Bob Shaw | January 19, 2012, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“what is right is not always popular and what is popular is not always right” – Albert Einstein
Ron Paul is right, and the fact that so many members of the media and government label him as extremist or crazy (because he truly believes the Constitution of the United States of America is government’s rule book) should be a terrifying indicator of not only the direction of our once great nation but where we are as a country at this very moment.
I hear commentators say that a vote for Paul would be a voe for Obama because Paul can’t win…I say, I vote for what I believe in. I believe in truth. I believe in what is right. Win or lose I will always stand by my convictions. That is what has made America great…standing up for what is right, not what is popular.
Posted by: HolvikArms | January 19, 2012, 11:34 am 11:34 am
This is one of the reasons that I admire Ron Paul. He has the moral fortitude to stand behind what he says, no matter how much he gets booed and laughed at. It takes a tremendous inner strength to stand up to the criticism he has endured and consistently put out the same message for 30 years. Even if you don’t agree with his policy positions, you have to admire a man who can do that. I know I do.
Posted by: James | January 19, 2012, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I can not believe how slanted the media has become. Every person I speak to does not understand the unconstitutional wars that we are in…. this has got to stop! Get out and show your support to this guy Ron Paul 2012
Posted by: Kraig | January 20, 2012, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Sure, don’t mention that the crowd booed the Thursday night moderator, John King, for ignoring Ron Paul on a medical question. Ignore how many Americans booed the moderator for his bias and instead only talk about a few people who booed the golden rule. Nice work “journalist.”
Posted by: Dan Roveto | January 21, 2012, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
All politicians will say everything to please the voters ,,All of them have very good plans for america the question is which one of them is truthful and can keep thier promises? for me its RON Paul hes straight forward and frank. others just sweet lies and false promises,,well i know one who keep his promise its OBAMA when he says he will change america,,yeah he did,,to worst not for better,, and i hope people will have an effort to search about the presindential candidate to know the candidate and thier plan for economy,,not depend on whos famous,or who is leading on polls coz media brainwashed people,,,dont rely on them,, Its for our own future we cant do same mistake again for voting the wrong person,, RON PAUl 2012!!!! Ron Paul dont mind the people booing you they’re idiot!!
Posted by: kaye | January 22, 2012, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm