SC Republicans Boo Newt Gingrich Over Romney Attacks
At a forum hosted by Mike Huckabee with 800 undecided South Carolina Republicans, Newt Gingrich was loudly booed when he criticized Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital, according to a Republican who attended the closed-press event.
“They were really angry,” said the attendee. The forum will be aired on Fox News tonight.
The booing came when Gingrich mentioned Romney’s name. I am told Gingrich was gently reprimanded by Huckabee who reminded him that the ground rules for the forum stipulated that the candidate were not allowed to attack each other.
Every candidate except for Ron Paul took part in the forum, each of them appearing separately.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
The only attacks that will work against Romney are towards his business record. Indeed, the only effective way to attack Romney is to attack his “electability” and Bain record. The only reason Romney is cruising to the nomination is that the Republicans think he is “electable” in the general election. Attacking Romney as a closet liberal (and his liberal Mass. record) does nothing because Republicans already know that and are holding their noses while voting. Attacking Romney as a liberal also only strengthens his general electability – so actually such attacks help Romney win the primary. The only attack that could possible work and prevent what seems to be the inevitable Romney nomination, is an attack on Romney’s business record (his greatest perceived strength) and general electability. That is what Gingrich, Perry, and Santorum should be doing. Attack Romney for ripping companies apart and swindling employees and the US taxpayers. Attack him for evading taxes – ask for his tax return. Make the case that when Romney’s tax returns become available he and Bain would become the poster boys for the Buffet rule. Make the case that when people see what the wall-street vulture capitalists like Romney pay in taxes – we can kiss good buy the Bush tax cut extension! Attack Romney just as Obama would attack him so that the voters see that he is not as “electable” as advertised! There is no other way of preventing a Romney nomination!
Posted by: alan | January 14, 2012, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Voters who want wars, torture, assassinations, “humanitarian” bombings in oil rich countries, indefinite detentions, drone attacks that kill the innocent, erosion of civil liberties, domestic war on the people (drug war), out-of-control debt and spending, graft and greed, crony capitalism, pandering to special interests, bailouts, more of the same, must NOT vote for Ron Paul.
Voters who want peace, a humane foreign policy, restoration of civil liberties, an end to the war on drugs, sound money, balanced budgets, honesty, integrity and transparency in government, and a President wholly committed to Constitutional government can vote for Ron Paul.
Ain’t that difficult a choice.
Posted by: Sleuth51 | January 14, 2012, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
The only other way to defeat Romney is for Gingrich, huntsman and santorum to drop out and rally behind paul. It is becoming clear that paul is the only non-Romney alternative with the enthusiasm, fundraising ability and staying power to defeat Romney and ultimately Obama. Mitt doesn’t have a snowballs chance of defeating Obama and we all know it. Obama inspired a youth movement in 2008 that propelled him just as the youth is propelling paul today. Disagree with their policies if you must but both Obama and paul are principled people. The country would benefit greatly by having a spirited debate about their respective political philosophies.
Posted by: Eric | January 14, 2012, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Sorry, the nation does not want Paul and his group of rabid supporters. And this title is misleading. It should have said McRomney’s campaign staff and supporters boo’d Gingrich.
Posted by: Kimberly | January 14, 2012, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Ron Paul is who the constitution would vote for if the constitution could vote. War is not the answer, life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is. Any slick talker can lie his way into the white house, it takes a real man to stand up for “we the people”. I hope this country realizes that before it’s too late. Liberty now! Ron Paul in 2012!
Posted by: Tom Tudo | January 14, 2012, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
The Republicans and the Democrats are pretty much the same in my opinion. Both have big government agendas. Romney is just like Obama; if it is between the two of them, I’ll have to sit this one out. RON PAUL 2012
Posted by: NONEOCON | January 14, 2012, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
There’s a reason why no one in Congress during the years of the Gingrich speakership came out in support of Newt – I sort of think I saw something about Clyburn appearing with Newt but of course Clyburn’s a democrat.
Posted by: snap | January 14, 2012, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I like Newt.
Posted by: Bill | January 14, 2012, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Newt has a lot of trouble following the rules. He is NOT on the ballot in his home state of Virginia because he failed to follow the rules. Newt was thrown out of Congress because he failed to follow the rules. I believe that there is trend here. Imagine the rules that he would break as the next president.
Posted by: SteveMT | January 14, 2012, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
I really do believe that Newt is a walking live hand grenade, I don’t think he’s likable or honest.
His wife would be a disasterous first lady, it would be a horror show.
Romney can win. He’s a decent guy.
Posted by: Boots | January 14, 2012, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Let’s see. Conservatives shouldn’t criticize any form of American’s business capitalism, right?
Well it’s interesting to watch how Romney and the GOP zombies collectively lecture conservatives on how not to question Romney’s past business practices, aka, under his American capitalism umbrella?
It’s also interesting that the GOP operative thugs think all Corporate Raiders operate under the same capitalism umbrella, above any scrutiny?
The same capitalism business umbrella principles supporting those who perform paid fetal abortions?
Merely claiming capitalism is off the table to shield Romney from any scrutiny is a lam argument. You need to check your rationale behind that!
True conservatives are asking Romney only to support his prior job creation claims. He should call off the GOP hit men, and show the same “broad shoulders” as Newt. Good Luck with your Guy!
Posted by: NewtsArmy | January 14, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Energy independence will give us the ability to disengage from these war prone areas and then have the $$ to invest in a defensive military. I see the need for our superpower military ability to defend those nations and people that are defenseless. But as in the case of Iraq, they have the ability to pay for this defense we have provided. They OWE us for their freedoms we paid for in blood and treasure. I cannot understand our leaderships inablity to understand this.
Posted by: phil | January 14, 2012, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Nonneocon: The only reason that Congress won’t back Newt is because he knows where all the bones are buried. They know if he becomes President, they won’t be able to get away with the BS they do now, and they will have to do their jobs. The truth hurts! Newt is the ONLY candidate that can make America sound and the shining city on the hill, once again!
Posted by: Nancy | January 14, 2012, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
I was there; Newt was booed because he broke the rules, and people weren’t “angry,” he just crossed a clear line- the rules were laid out in the beginning of the program that the candidates were not allowed to mention each other at all, and no attacks allowed. It was just a clear case of rule breaking and that’s it. Don’t read any more into it.
Posted by: Margaret | January 14, 2012, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
If Ron Paul were a little more passionate about defending this country from those seeking to destoy us, I would be inclined to vote for him. He has stated that he is ok with Iran obtaining a nuke. Am I to trust Ron Paul’s indifference to the fact that if a suicide bomber had access to a nuclear weapon, they wouldn’t use it?
Posted by: phil | January 14, 2012, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Congress won’t support Newt because he knows where all the bones are buried. They are afraid they will have to stop the BS. They are afraid they will have to do the job they are paid to do. Newt is the ONLY candidate that has the ability to bring America back to sound and the shining city on the hill! Newt 2012
Posted by: Nancy | January 14, 2012, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Romney is just what we need as a nation – a corporate raider in the White house would clean out the governmnet deadwood skating on the tax payeres dollar, get rid of losers beginning with Obummer’s czarsand demolish Obamacare. I hope romney fires them all, making Amrica lean and mean and financially healthy. He can do it. go romney!!!
Posted by: Jean | January 14, 2012, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
I could never vote for Newt. As a matter of fact the only Republican running for president I would vote for would be Romney. Most of the others are whacky religious zealots, who think their religous beliefs are the only correct ones. If Romney had won the last Republican nomination, and then presidency we would have a better run country. McCain was another DUD. This is from a registered Independent.
Posted by: Holly | January 14, 2012, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
This crowd booing was a set up by the GOP higher ups and Fox News. They wanted to get this on tape. Most of those people were most likely hired by Fox or Romney to boo Gingrich
Posted by: Jason | January 14, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“If Ron Paul were a little more passionate about defending this country” – We are so many in the electorate misinformed? As a follower of the Constitution, Dr. Paul clearly understands that CONGRESS and only CONGRESS has the power to declare war. Why are some so worried that Dr. Paul would not uphold the Constitution and, if necessary, respect congressional vote? Wasting billions on unnecessary and extended wars has put America at a much greater risk of collapse due to deficit spending. All very simple if you took a moment to actually LISTEN.
Posted by: Mike | January 14, 2012, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Ron Paul was right to skip this biased candidate’s forum held by Mike “Huckelberry”. First things first, Mike “Huckelberry” has already endorsed Mitt Romney, so all of the other candidates that did choose to show up for this so=called forum only proved how desperate they are to get some face time, and that tyhey are all chumps! Second, and probably more important is the fact that Mike “Huckelberry” endorsed Mitt Romney at all, which proved that “Huckelberry” IS in fact an establishment puppet just as I always believed he was. How absolutely disgusting!
Ron Paul avoided the other clown debate with Donald Trump, and was right to avoid this one with “Huckelberry”; a man whose religious beliefs can be bought by the establishment! “Huckelberry” has proven to be as bad a flip-flopper as the clown he endorsed!
Posted by: Bob Vondruska | January 14, 2012, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
I do not like Mr. Romney, nor di care for Mr. Gingrich. But if either becomes the nominee I will vote for them in order to defeat Obama. It is time for a staunch conservative to take over the Presidency and also to bring more conservatives into both Hoses of Congress. Mr. Romney and Mr. Gingrich both represent the moderate Republican establishment. Maybe that is all this country can handle for now. But these people only want to handle the purse strings for their power. The true conservatives have this country as their first priority. But remember anyone but Obama!!!!
Posted by: sprdthewrd | January 14, 2012, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
I prefer a principled, constitutionalist, which is Ron Paul. However, I could live with a realist like Mitt Romeny.
On the other hand, it would be a disaster to get a warfare/welfare supporter like Gingrich or Santorum as chief executive.
Posted by: Buddy | January 14, 2012, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Mitt Romney’s GOP Rivals…
Are Embarrassing Themselves, by taking their attack strategy from Pres. Obama’s playbook. Furthermore, who is writing Newt Gingrich’s new attack material now – Fidel Castro?
I think Mitt put Newt in the trunk.
Posted by: Michael Veritas | January 14, 2012, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Newt can now stop and go home…sore loser, pathetic, and no chance to beat Obababa
Posted by: Smokey the Bear | January 14, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Was at the forum today. The producers encourage the clapping etc at these events. The booing was real but not necessarily passionate. Newt seemed to be goaded into this by the question. This event was supposedly for undecideds but many attendees had already selected a candidate. Why even a questioneer was a Paul supporter!
Posted by: Gary Heuer | January 14, 2012, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
So, the guy asks Newt to explain attacking another candidate, and then Newt isn’t allowed to mention that candidate. It was a gotcha question. Huckabee wanted to be a conservative president, and he lost. You can watch him talk about Gingrich and tell he’s not a big fan. I think he’s jealous.
Posted by: Ryan | January 14, 2012, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
The article about Newt being booed is vastly overstated. Having seen the segment it sounded more like a few groans. There was a lot of applause for his opinions. Bias does funny things to reporters.
Posted by: Alexandra Mark | January 14, 2012, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Newt wasn’t “booed”. There were forum ground rules that included not attacking other candidates…but Newt wasn’t doing that. He was saying we needed to bring facts out in any case..not leaving out an entire section…as Obama would not. He was stressing that we must be able to respond when the time comes for the nominee to debate Obama.
Posted by: Elizabeth | January 14, 2012, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
So Bain overall made money for its Private Investors…This administration has Invested Trillions in Failed policies of Middle Class tax payers money and when can we expect a pay back????
Posted by: Len | January 14, 2012, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Did the writer of this article actually see that Interviwe???
Posted by: Len | January 14, 2012, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
I think I’ll go and vote with one foot in in the Florida Primary. Romney’s the man!
Posted by: oldcutup | January 14, 2012, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Doesn’t bode for the entire state of SC that a few people booed Gingrich. In fact, Newt is much more organized in SC than Romney. He has a much bigger presence here, and is better received. This story is anecdotal at best.
Posted by: Emma | January 14, 2012, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Mitt and Newt are establishment candidates in the vein of Nixon, Rockefeller, Dole and McCain. GOP needs true conservatives such as Ron MD and Rick Santorum, who are currently polled as tied for 2nd in the Palmetto State. As evangelicals go to the polls we must not split the vote as we did in 2008 between Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee and thereby gave the nomination to John McCain. Of course we couldn’t get excited about an establishment moderate to liberal ;until he got Gov. Palin to join the ticket.
Posted by: Mark A. Peter, MA, MA | January 14, 2012, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Much ado about nothing All Barack Channel. Newt was chastised by Huckabee for bringing up Romney’s name, but there wasn’t massive booing. As a matter of fact, he received a good deal of applause after he answered the question. There seemed to be a lot of Paul supporters in attendance, even though he refused to attend, so that may be where most of the booing originated.
Posted by: Susan in Texas | January 14, 2012, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
@ nooni those facts also explain why Ron Paul never gets the nod. Not connected as well as the others. It’s a coronation and all it comes down to is whose turn it is. It is always a member of the elite. It is President Romney’s turn. You have nothing to do with it, but we’ll make you feel like you did. Both sides enslave the population, just to different ideas. All of them on the hill still share the booty, regardless of which letter is after their name. The only thing that stays the same is what they dole back out to us after they’re done playing in our wallets. It’s all phony as hell, but we don’t look at it because they keep us busy fighting over which side is right.
Posted by: pointless | January 14, 2012, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Newtonce again proved why he is the best candidate for the republican nominee. As for the “boos” the man that asked the question directly provoked Newt into using Romney’s name. That is clear. Newt also got the loudest and longest applause.
And Paul is trailing in SC and knows he can’t ride in second on the coat tails of the liberals and Indie ticket, SC being mainly republican. So he chickened out but mainly he doesn’t care about those that won’t swallow his pacifist, pot smoking agenda.
Posted by: Barry | January 14, 2012, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
The bottom line is that we have to throw this 2-bit dictator out of the white house. We would vote for Porky Pig to do this and restore America….. and any of the Republican candidates are better than Obama or Porky Pig.
Posted by: clementine | January 14, 2012, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Newt is the only GOP candidate capable to defeat Obama. The problem is, establishment hates him, because he once brought uncomfortable changes to Washington. So, GOP elite would rather loose elections, shoving unelectable corporate raider down our throats, then risk Newt doing what is necessary to put country on the right track. Romney has no chance of winning, because his LBO deals financed Michael Milken junk bonds are the same type of outrageous excess as subprime deals financed by CDO tranches. GOP elite tries to silence Gingrich and sweep this under the carpet, but Obama surely has enough firepower to explain all the details in general elections.
Posted by: rft | January 14, 2012, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
This article is very disingenuous as what few boos there were, were very low volume, and conversely, his answers were received with loud applause and enthusiasm.
Posted by: Charles | January 14, 2012, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I don’t know if Mr. Karl was in the same SC Republican forum…what BOO???? Our voters do not benefit with this type of coverage….Mr. Karl seems to be booing one of the best candidate from the bunch in his own mind. We need to have people covering the news who care more about the truth than the title of “their story.” Newt has the best ideas the best character and the best heart to run against Obama…and this “want to be newscasters” have the least courage to step up and display the man he really is and the president that he can be….
Posted by: Aida | January 14, 2012, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I support Ron Paul however, I’ll take Romney over the rest. Newt is a hand grenade ready to go off at any second. He is a very angry and short tempered man. Santorum is just completely crazy. I do not need him forcing his religious views down my throat. The relationship that I have with God is between God and myself, not God, President Santorum and me. Santorum is also not near as Conservative as he wants us to believe he is. His record speaks for itself.
Posted by: OoLaLa | January 14, 2012, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
“If Ron Paul were a little more passionate about defending this country from those seeking to destoy us, I would be inclined to vote for him. He has stated that he is ok with Iran obtaining a nuke. Am I to trust Ron Paul’s indifference to the fact that if a suicide bomber had access to a nuclear weapon, they wouldn’t use it?”
The people trying to destroy this country are not in Tehran. They are in Washington DC, and they already control more than enough nukes to destroy, not only Iran, but the entire Middle East several times over.
Posted by: Jose Mora | January 14, 2012, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
OK, I just finished watching the Huckabee forum. I watched closely for the Newt boo. The person claiming to be a Republican that said Newt was “loudly booed” and “they were really angry”, is either a Romney fan or maybe even a Paul fan, OR has super human hearing. On TV, it could barely be heard, and was only for a few seconds.
It’s such a shame that no one, reporters or spectators, just can’t seem to tell the truth about any one but they’re candidate. And I’m not even sure about that.
I’m not even sure that the questioneer wasn’t a Romney fan and trying to trip Newt up, which happened.
TOTALLY OVERBLOWN!
Newt clearly had applause on each of his answers. All the others had applause, but not on all answers. Perry did very well. He’s got some great ideas. A shame he can’t debate. Too many of them kept getting off track, trying to get their records on record.
Posted by: Nancy | January 14, 2012, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Bain Capital is actually Romney’s strong suit. So, an attack there is little to gain and lots to lose. Besides that, but you can see Obama’s crew and the MSM (same thing, really) taping all that stuff for attack ads after the Conventions. Mitt does have problems: Gun Control, Cap & Trade, Romneycare, and possibly others that data miners may find. That said, there is nobody on that stage who shouldn’t be able to beat the Poser in Chief.
Posted by: Jerome Borden | January 14, 2012, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Agree with what Charles commented. Very distorted. All it takes is 1 and it’s “loud booing” Heard nothing but applause. No booing.
Posted by: Jack | January 14, 2012, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Got yourself a GOP Kennedy, do you?
Posted by: NewtsArmy | January 14, 2012, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
My God – some of you making comments sound like 911 Truthers with your Romney conspiracy theories. Latest SC poll now shows Romney up by 21 points over Newt. The Bain attacks are backfiring, Newt is losing ground, Ron Paul is not as faring well with a closed primary. I can only assume, most of the Romney attackers have to be dems in GOP clothing. Many claim that Romney is no better that Obama. If that is your opinion, you sadly lack any political knowledge and common sense.
Posted by: BabyBoo | January 14, 2012, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
POSTED BY: ALAN | JANUARY 14, 2012, 4:48 PM 4:48 PM, what did Romney do at Bain that is so terrible, did not the present administration do the same thing or worse, getting people layed off while bailing out the car companies, thousands lost their jobs, entire car lines were shut down, Solindra was told to hold of on the layoffs untill after the election, did not the present administration play venture capitalist and lost every time, TAXPAYERS MONEY, Bain ( private money) took companies that were going bankrupt because of mismanagement layed people off that were just warming a seat made it profitable and then sold them. So would you rather have the company go bankrupt and ALL employees lose their jobs. So before you put your 2 cents in think first. Apparently you forgotten that we will get the biggest tax increase in american history curtesy of Pres.Obama come Jan.1, 2013, kind of funny its going into effect AFTER the elections.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 14, 2012, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
The next president has to clean up the country of Obama residue. It takes experience and an intimate knowledge of Congress. After the cleanup, the president after can fully chase after after the vision and get back to normal. When one drives, he/she does not look at the horizon, but the car in front to avoid accidents and costly detours. All candidates have visions, but only Gingrich has the added experience. Obama is a sorry case for having voted for someone who has no morals and who spouts half lies and full lies as if good leadership is like that.
Posted by: Ken | January 15, 2012, 12:06 am 12:06 am
For those of you saying that you like Ron Paul excePt for his foreign policy, I implore you to do some research. America has been playing an extremely active role in the middle east for over fifty years, often resulting in deaths, so is there any wonder there is so much hostility to America,
Ron Paul wants to follow the constitution. That means going to the congress to declare war.
Unless you want to vote in another neocon puppet into the white house, vote Ron Paul – the modern day Thomas Jefferson.
Posted by: David | January 15, 2012, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Well, let’s see:
Newt became House Speaker by throwing his alleged principles under the bus and getting the 1994 Crime Bill / Gun Ban passed after it initially died on a procedural vote.
Romney signed into law the worst anti-gun law in Mass. history, as well as RomneyCare.
Perry supported giving free college to illegals while many citizens can’t afford tuition.
Santorum was crushed in his 2006 re-election bid because he moved to the left and thumbed his nose at many of his core constituents, not the least of which was Firearm Owners Against Crime, the largest PAC in Pennsylvania.
IMHO the only tried-and-true Conservative running is Ron Paul. When news networks that are supposedly different in political slant, everything from Faux News to MS-LSD, treat Ron Paul, and only Ron Paul, with the same dismissal, misrepresentation, and smear tactics, that tells me that Ron Paul is the one candidate that will actually shake things up in DC.
Posted by: Wayne | January 15, 2012, 12:22 am 12:22 am
FLASHBAK CBS interview Jan 2008: HUCKABEE: “You know, what Mitt Romney did is admirable in some quarters, but in some ways, there are a lot of people who lost their jobs when his company would take over, restructure a company, lay a lot of people off. Lot of times, the CEOs and the people at the top got some pretty huge bonuses and made a lot of money. A lot of people went home without a pension and a paycheck. I’m not sure that’s what Michigan’s looking for. ”
NY TIMES McCain: “…as head of his investment company he presided over the acquisition of companies that laid off thousands of workers.”
Posted by: Claudia | January 15, 2012, 12:51 am 12:51 am
I didn’t watch this, but is this like the gay soldier, when they say he was booed? He says Romney. People Boo.
What if Newt says Obama and people Boo?
Sad, but anything the media says about Newt, I assume it’s a lie.
Newt gets hammered for letting us know that Mitt “Safe Choice” Romney is Obamas dream opponent. I guess Newt should have let people keep voting for the SAFE SURE WINNER. Obama being re-elected is an attack on Capitalism. Newt tried to warn us. Obama will parade out every victim of Bain. He’ll have a field day and 4 more years.
Posted by: lsmith8675309 | January 15, 2012, 12:55 am 12:55 am
I watched the Forum this evening – twice. I liked the format because the candidates had no idea what was coming and had to respond quickly. In a situation you like you can really tell who can truly think on their feet. I though Romni gave political answers but he did answer the questions. Forget aboout Sanitariom – a nice guy but definitely not presidential material. Huntsman was his normal too-serious, dodge-ball self. I was very proud of Perry – he came through in spades and was very personable in doing it. Newt was Newt! Direct on the questions and instructional at the same time – I think I learn something about our government, our history and our constitution every time I hear him. It does some surprise me – it makes me angry – that in Iowa Romni and Paul spent over 7 million dollars attaching Gingrich and the only response by the media was, “Well, that’s politics!” But when Newt and his supporters begin to reveal the reality behind Romni’s “business experience”, he is berated as angry, jealous and a dirty politician. Nancy was correct – the RNC does not want Newt to be nominated – they are deathly afraid of him – he knows where the bones are buried and he knows how the system works and he has the establishment – including congress – shaking in their boots. But, Newt is the only one that could stand up to and defeat Obama in a face-to-face debate and he is the only one of the candidates that will do what he says he will do – no matter who gets in the way. Perry, unfortunately, can’t debate worth a whoop. Now, if the debate with Obama was held behind a roadhouse – in a circle of cowboys – Perry would take him in a second. I am afraid, however, that the Republicans (my chosen party, unfortunately) are going to shoot themselves in the foot agin by backing Romni but I have this scary feeling that Paul, the spoiler, and Romni’s backers are going to guarantee a second term for Obana. My wife said, and I agree, that the people of the U.S. generally get just what they deserve if they are not willing to stand up and be counted when it counts.
Posted by: jerry | January 15, 2012, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Mitt ran his campaigned based on his 25 years of experience at Bain. He claimed he created 100,000 jobs that he can’t back up. Then in a recent ad in South Carolina, it noted thousands of jobs instead… changing his story. When you’re running for the highest office, a person’s career is fair game. Bain’s primary goal is to reap as much profit for themselves and their investors…. and many times at the expense of others. They’re not in the business to create jobs. Since he is very much against releasing his tax records, I wouldn’t be surprised if Mitt has offshore bank accounts to avoid the IRS.
No candidate is perfect, but at least Newt has a 90% consistent conservative lifetime record. Mitt ran to the left of Kennedy, and can’t run on his liberal record.
Posted by: Republican | January 15, 2012, 1:37 am 1:37 am
I watched it, they boo’d for a few seconds because Newt went out of the forum rules. I don’t think it was because he attacked Romney he just was breaking the rules of the format.
Posted by: sailordude | January 15, 2012, 2:00 am 2:00 am
What a load of complete bull. They booed for two seconds, it was a few people and at the end of his answer, he got applause. Much ado about nothing.
Posted by: Mike A | January 15, 2012, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Romney has an outstanding resume, much to the chagrin of the intellectually challenged libtrolls who think corporations are evil and are still hoping Big Mommy government will take care of them from cradle to grave. Bain has some fantastic success stories like Staples, Sports Authority,and Domino’s Pizza, among others. Companies that are not profitable don’t survive in capitalist societies and will always fall to tougher competitors. This system produced the highest general standard of living in human history, as competition produces excellence, something government workers and politicians know nothing about. Read Romney’s resume. It makes Obama look like the infantile street corner activist he really is.
Posted by: Trajan Long | January 15, 2012, 3:06 am 3:06 am
I watched this. There were sounds from the crowd. The sounds were regarding Newt’s words. It wasn’t booing. This was quite a subdued moment actually. Also Newt went on to answer the question appropriately and the crowd continued to be receptive to Gingrich’s remarks. This story has an axe to grind, as usual.
Posted by: sherman | January 15, 2012, 3:15 am 3:15 am
Hey “Babyboo”…. Since you point out that poll from Reuters that shows Romney up so far….. Go to the Reuters site and actually read the article. You will see that they polled an equal number of republicans and democrats, a ratio NOWHERE near accurate as it relates to a top primary. In addition, it was an online poll. That is methodology is not reliable.
Posted by: sherman | January 15, 2012, 3:23 am 3:23 am
I will hold my nose and vote for Paul if he wins the Rnom. I will despise him forever if he runs as a third party candidate and splits the vote against The Messiah. This election is NOT about getting a particular guy into the White House – that’s the secondary goal. The first and only goal that really matters is getting someone in OTHER THAN Obama. It is time to throw the Traitor-in-Chief out and put someone – anyone – heck, I’d vote in a pickpocketing dog catcher who is blind in one eye and smells like 5 day old onions if it would make Obama a 1-termer. Vote Paul – IF and only IF he’s the Republican nominee. Otherwise vote for whoever is the Republican Nominee – even if it’s the aforementioned pickpocketing dog catcher.
Posted by: Cleary | January 15, 2012, 5:32 am 5:32 am
I find it amusing once again that fox news refused to air the best pro-American candidate, Ron Paul. If you can’t see the bias by now, you are all blind.
Posted by: Nathan Ranger | January 15, 2012, 5:45 am 5:45 am
Romney is the only electable person in this race and he will, no doubt, be our next president so you might as well act like a Republican and get behind him!!!
Posted by: Mary Smith | January 15, 2012, 7:19 am 7:19 am
It is amazing how easy people are manipulated by the liberal media. They have hyped Romney up as the next president and Huckabee is drinking the kool aid. Mitt Romney is the liberal democrat poster boy. They would love nothing more than Romney to win the nomination, because they know Obama can beat him. Even Jimmy Carter wants Romney to win. Newt Gingrich is the only candidate that can beat Obama in a debate. That is why the media has been making Gingrich out to be a bad guy. Sure Gingrich has some baggage, but he does not have more than Obama. We have never met any of Obama’s girlfriends or we have never heard from any students he taught law to. Why is that? While Ron Paul wants to drastically change our economic policies, he will literally destroy us with his foreign policies. We would probably end up with a bomb in the first year. Rick Santorum and Rick Perry are good candidates, but they do no have the experience or the historical knowledge Gingrich has. The only thing I can say about Huckabee is that he must want Obama to win since Obama will slaughter Romney in November. You better hope we all vet every candidate now before we go to the polls in November. If Romney cannot take the heat from Gingrich now, how will Romney handle it in October?
Posted by: justavoter | January 15, 2012, 8:16 am 8:16 am
You Paul-bots are truly insane. The guy refused an earlier debate, recently ran from reporters at another event, then refused to attend this debate, and yet you try to claim there’s a media conspiracy to ignore him?
AH HAHAHA!!! You’re all a hoot…..
Posted by: BigBoa | January 15, 2012, 9:00 am 9:00 am
America Must Nuke Iran because they might have Nukes! …wow Americans are really that stupid and vengeful? What the Hell Happened to Jesus Christ???
Posted by: Pittacus the Great | January 15, 2012, 9:11 am 9:11 am
under 42? your screwed HAHAHAHA i guess that hip hop and vid games really paid off. you skateboarded yourself into a self served hell. now deal with it and get a job for christs sake so us over 55′ers get our full share of promised sos ec when it comes time.
Posted by: jesus h christ | January 15, 2012, 9:19 am 9:19 am
It was not loud at all. Plus he didn’t attack Romney, he just mentioned one of Romney’s plans. I don’t get why the media wants Romney elected. I think it because they thinks he’s the only one Obama might be able to beat. If Romney wins it take obamacare off the table, if brought up in a debate Obama could simple say well you set up a healthcare plan in you state which was a model for obamacare.
Posted by: Ruvabey | January 15, 2012, 9:37 am 9:37 am
No one in this field is electable. Romney’s a weak candidate and everyone else is crazy. None of them can win in a general election against the sitting president. This election could’ve been a cakewalk for republicans if they’d only fielded an acceptable candidate. Where are the sane republicans?
Posted by: asdf | January 15, 2012, 9:38 am 9:38 am
BS article. and even bigger BS headline. The more journalists twist truth and write sensational headlines, the more it proves they actually don’t respect their own readers.
Posted by: E BballCourt | January 15, 2012, 9:55 am 9:55 am
More biased and untruthful coverage by ABC. I watched the forum and heard no loud boos to Newt’s statement. Indeed, his answers were well-received and applauded. Wake up America. Think for yourself instead of allowing the media and the establishment to warp your thinking. We need Newt’s experience, intelligence, and ability to articulate conservative principles effectively. We simply must defeat President Obama. Newt is the best candidate to do this. Conservatives, please rally around Newt. This election may be our nation’s last chance to end the madness.
Posted by: WATCHER | January 15, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Newt Gingrich is 2 pts behind Romney in SC when considering Polls that allow ONLY REPUBLICANS to vote, everyone else (including Santorum) is waay back. NOTE: SC Primaries only allow Republicans to Vote.
The MSM is trying to hope the dishonest Flip-Romney by pointing to a Reuters/ISPOS poll that has him 21 points ahead. When you look closely at the poll, it was taken from 380 Republicans AND 380 Democrats. NOTE: I find it VERY interesting that Democrats would prefer Romney as the Republican Nominee.
Newt is the only True Conservative left in the race who can stop Romney. trash Obama in the debates, and lead the next Reagan Revolution. He has my vote.
Posted by: Stephen Pazian | January 15, 2012, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
First, some of you people are insane. Romney has consistently beaten Obama for the last 2 years. Thats why he’s been ONlY talking about him. They’re afraid and it’s blatantly obvious. Maybe you should wake up and see that the reason a lot of ‘establishment’ guys are pushing for Romney over Newt is because HE CAN AND WILL WIN! Newt with his flip flipping on national single payer system/ global warming/ cheating on his wife will look like a seriously sad fat angry old man against the skinny nice looking black man in the White House.
If it was a radio debate between Newt and Obama I agree it wouldn’t even be close in Newts favor but you are being willfully blind to reality if you think Newt will look anything but terrible on TV next to Obama. Hell besides the first couple debates he’s looked like that against Romney.
Romney will win in 2012, get over it. The guy who says he’s a weak candidate ya right. Oh if only he would have never been successful in the private sector/ and as Governor and had just devoted his time to the criminals at ACORN to be better prepared to lead ‘the free world’. The only possible reason the American people will pick Obama over someone else is if they have personal/unavoidable baggage like Newt/Herman Cain/Ron Paul (racist newsletters). Now I know that those guys would be a far better president then the one we have now (and Ron Paul likely a very good President) but that’s not the question. Who will be the best presidential candidate WHO WILL BEAT OBAMA IN A GENERAL ELECTION.
After watching Romney speak and researching his record over the last 4 months I am convinced he is a good man, great self made businessman, and right leaning (like American people) guy who can take the power structure back from Reid/Pelosi/Obama.
Posted by: Rob Repub. from MA | January 15, 2012, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
For all those who have been lulled into the old “foreign policy scare” that the media has pushed on you about Ron Paul, consider the fact the now several high ranking CIA officials have confirmed that Ron Paul is correct on his foreign policy. And, you might want to also consider that Dr. Paul accurately predicted the housing boom and subsequent crash over 10 years before it happened. He has an eerie ability to see into the future and predict the outcome of our failed policies. Contrast that with all the others in congress and the media who were cheering on the banking cartel who orchestrated the fall of the American financial system.
Posted by: NeverCompromisePrinciple | January 15, 2012, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Newt is the only true conservative left in the GOP field? What are you Newt backing idiots smoking? Really? You Newt kool aid drinking Confederate flag waving morons from the Deep South (SC especially) wouldn’t know a true conservative if it bit you on your buttocks and died. A vote for Newt or any warmongering GOP candidate is another vote for Obama. There’s no difference between the 2 parties. BTW, Newt is an NWO establishment candidate who wants more war which will mean more defecit. We can’t afford anymore of that. Get it? You want real change? You want someone who lives, eats & breathes the US Constitution? You want someone who WILL shrink our govt? Then I hope you’re smart enough to realize that the only viable conservative who can & will beat Obama, not to mention fix our economy the right away, is the one you’re all afraid of. His name is Ron Paul. Dr. Paul realizes that these 2 unpaid wars are the REAL reason why America is so far in debt. He will also fix Medicare & SS. Ron Paul in 2012 or else goodbye America!!
Posted by: StareDownMan1 | January 16, 2012, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
I agree with some of what Ron Paul says, though not all of it. However, Romney isn’t so bad. As for the GOP, get ready to support Romney, because unless somehow the moderate Republicans turn around, which are a huge chunk of the GOP anyways, Romney will ultimately win. He’s captured enough of the caucuses that he doesn’t have so great of an uphill battle. As for Ron Paul, I would hope he has some decent books out there because I would promote them, he does have the ideas, and I would argue that plenty of his ideas are hitting somewhere. As for GOPers, it’s time to start worrying seriously about Congress, beause in the presidential race only the moderate and liberal candidates of both GOP and Democrat have the brains to make it through the caucuses and the primaries, it’s just how it is. The far right needs to accept that they will never have a candidate in line with their beliefs in the presidential election, and even in the primaries.
Posted by: Dan in MA | January 18, 2012, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm