Jan 4, 2012 7:18am

What to Make of Romney’s Narrow Win in Iowa

After two tries, Mitt Romney can finally add the title, “Iowa Caucus winner” to his resume. And, like a good management consultant, he did so while spending significantly less money than he did four years ago.

More important, the man who once looked like his strongest opponent for the nomination, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, came in a disappointing fifth place, and announced that he was returning to Austin to reassess his political future.

Newt Gingrich, who also looked like he would be a serious threat to Romney, struggled to a fourth-place finish. He has pledged to drop the Mr. Nice Guy approach he took in Iowa, and to start making a sharper contrast with Romney in New Hampshire.

Even so, the damage inflicted on Gingrich’s standing in New Hampshire as well as nationally is real. And, the mercurial former speaker has yet to prove he has the discipline needed to sustain a focused and effective assault on Romney.

Even so, an eight vote victory over an underfunded foe who just a couple weeks ago barely registered a blip in the polls, isn’t particularly impressive.

Neither is the fact that he received six fewer votes last night than he did in 2008.

And, despite his win, he still hasn’t been able to shed the perception that he’s got a problem with conservative Republican voters.

According to entrance polling taken of Iowa caucus goers, 47 percent identified themselves as “very conservative.” Santorum took 35 percent of their votes to Romney’s 14 percent.

Voters who called themselves “strong” tea party supporters went with Santorum by a 2-1 margin.

The big bright spot in the entrance polling for Romney is the fact that the economy, not social or cultural issues, is the driving issue for all voters. Forty-two percent of Iowa caucus voters said the economy was their most important issue – just 13 percent picked abortion.

Romney took 33 percent of those whose top concern was the economy to just 19 percent for Santorum.

Romney now needs to show he can broaden his coalition to include more strong conservatives, while Santorum will need to broaden his message to appeal beyond his base of social conservative Republicans.

Amy Walter, Political Director, ABC News

SHOWS:

User Comments

Perry is history.

Posted by: newcountryman | January 4, 2012, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Perry is history. POSTED BY: NEWCOUNTRYMAN ******
I second that.

Posted by: michael | January 4, 2012, 9:40 am 9:40 am

That’s easy.

Iowa does NOT matter. Iowa is NOT indicative of the rest of the country.

Those who WIN in Iowa, are not necessarily to be taken seriously, because anyone can go there, and spend enough time and effort, and sway those people.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 4, 2012, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Here’s what to make of Romney’s win. The liberal media tried, and failed to get a “cupcake” for Barack. Say goodbye.

Posted by: ray | January 4, 2012, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Perry and Bachman need to be history, and Ron Paul, too. I can’t imagine what Republicans are saying when they support such people…”Hey, America, are you fed up with far left politics? Then vote for us and we’ll give you some far right politics.”…..Gotta be some sanity in this country somewhere, but exactly where?

Posted by: munster42 | January 4, 2012, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I assume the REPUBLICAN MACHINE gets ONE STEP closer to their candidate they chose months ago. I hope not but eventually anybody has to be better than what we got in 2008. You can only BLAME someone or something for just so long before they figure out that YOU have NO IDEA what you are doing! OR should I say maybe they did figure you out and don’t like what you were up to.

Posted by: Steve | January 4, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

What to make of it? Make believe because he will never sit in the Oval Office unless he is a guest or something.

Posted by: AlnHouston | January 5, 2012, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.