Is the Republican Party Facing an Enthusiasm Gap?

Gerald Herbert/AP Photo
As the caucuses and primaries pick up pace, with Colorado and Minnesota taking center stage today, many are wondering whether the initial enthusiasm surrounding the Republican race is waning, given the remarkably low turnout in the Nevada caucuses, which came and went with little fanfare.
In Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina, turnout surged, compared to four years ago and each state went to a different candidate.
But that trend appears to be on the decline. In both Florida and Nevada, turnout dropped sharply from 2008. Florida saw nearly 280,000 fewer voters in its primary last week, while more than 11,000 fewer voters turned out to vote in Nevada on Saturday compared to four years ago. Mitt Romney won both states by a landslide.
Some observers say the declining interest is a reflection of the lack of enthusiasm for the former Massachusetts governor.
Polls show mixed enthusiasm for the current crop of GOP candidates. More Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters — about 52 percent — said the Republican field is only fair or poor than did so in early January, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center, and only 46 percent had positive opinions of the field. At this time in 2008, 68 percent of Republican and GOP-leaning voters rated the field as excellent or good, according to Pew.
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, the only candidate who doesn’t have a win under his belt, also blamed the low turnout on the lack of satisfaction with the candidates in an interview on “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos.
Some observers, however, point to a trend of higher turnout in counties where former House speaker Newt Gingrich outperformed Romney.
“He’s much more of an attack dog when it comes to not only his primary opponents but also his potential general election opponent, Obama,” said Michael McDonald, a professor at George Mason University who runs the United States Elections Project, which monitors election and turnout data. “The Republican voters really crave someone who’s going to display that sort of attack mentality when it comes to the general election. That’s something you can get enthused upon. Romney’s campaign is not a campaign that seems to be able to spark that kind of enthusiasm.”
Turnout is also directly related to how closely voters are engaged in the political process, and that was more the case in early nominating states than in Florida and Nevada.
Interest was boosted in part due to the initial “spectacle” that was created by personal attacks and fiery debate performances, McDonald said. Gingrich’s ranking in the polls surged following a debate in which he roasted the national media as well as his opponents. Romney saw a similar boost after the CNN debate in Florida, where the former governor spoke passionately against negative ads targeted against him.
“Certainly, conflict creates an audience. So when candidates are going negative against each other it becomes a spectacle and voters are drawn in to look at the spectacle,” McDonald said.
But experts caution that it’s too soon to declare Florida and Nevada national bellwethers.
Florida’s primary numbers were boosted in 2008 because of a contentious property tax ballot initiative. Voters could also have been deterred from going to the polls by the spate of negative television ads against Gingrich by Romney and his super PAC. And in Nevada, Romney was poised to win because of strong Mormon support and his history in the state. The former Massachusetts won the caucus there four years ago as well.
And in both states, exit polls showed that voters had made up their minds well in advance, unlike in the first three nominating states where a majority decided just days before the election.
In virtually every state, the one attribute voters have said they are looking for is a candidate who can beat President Obama in the general election. That trend could bode well for the Republican nominee, even if enthusiasm in the primaries and caucuses is waning.
The early elections, said Neil Newhouse, the lead pollster for Romney, is more a function of the number of candidates and the type of campaigns they are running rather than an indicator of the general election.
“Those who are trying to make a linkage between the Republican primary and enthusiasm for the fall ticket are just barking up the wrong tree,” he said. “What we’re seeing is that their [voter's] feeling toward Barack Obama has not changed. The fall election will be about Barack Obama. Once we get through the primary should Romney be the nominee, Republican voter enthusiasm will not be a problem.”

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Enthusiasm for our government and congress is waning, not just the republican primary. Many see a broken government that can’t agree on fixing what is broke in this country. What you see in our government is a reflection of our society in general. The political process has divided the country more in the last 20 years than I have ever seen. The entire country seems to be at civil war between the democrats and republicans, with the rhetoric and partisan games in congress setting the bar. I for one, am disgusted with what I see happening in the republican primary and especially the scorched earth tactics of the Gingrich campaign. He intends to destroy Romney from politics whether he wins the primary or not. The democrats showed the same in the last election between Obama and Clinton. I am losing my enthusiasm for politics more every year and can only hope the greatest country in the world can overcome it’s bitter party rivalry to save this country before it’s too late.
Posted by: Indymind | February 7, 2012, 6:41 am 6:41 am
No, that is not true. The Democrats did not display this stupidity. The Democrats came together and Hillary supported Obama. Democrats are not zealous idiots.
Posted by: tom | February 7, 2012, 6:51 am 6:51 am
Look at this group of republican candidates. They are the WORST pathetic bunch to ever run for this office, and to be quite frank, it is an embarrassment and a disgrace to have the rest of the world see these people represent this nation.
Posted by: TonyM | February 7, 2012, 6:51 am 6:51 am
RON PAUL AND THE BIGGEST IRONY OF OUR LIFETIME
Why is a nation gifted with a world top class Constitution, based on democratic principles, getting the results of a bankrupt third world dictatorial welfare/warfare state? It’s not the Constitution that failed the people. It’s the people of America that failed the Constitution at all levels of society.
The leaders of the country have certainly failed the people by catering to special interest groups to the point of being dominated in most every aspect of political life. That’s the reason why our financially dominated and carefully crafted election rules and procedures assure that only Presidents are chosen who will allow the wars to go on, as the country goes further into bankruptcy, while individual and civil rights are constantly lost along the way.
Even the most important economic decisions are made by the same group of private bankers, often the very same individuals, which the government is not even allowed to audit or monitor (Federal Reserve), regardless of which establishment candidate from either party becomes President.
A free press and mass media were given special privileges as well as important obligations to prevent America’s takeover by an elite establishment. Their actual news coverage was to be informative, balanced, and guided by democratic principles, especially when it comes to elections. Coverage was to be fair and basically limited to reporting the facts while letting the voters decide.
The mass media in turn has made a mockery out of democratic and free elections during the last two Presidential campaigns when it came to their coverage of Ron Paul. During much of this time he was ignored, laughed at, ridiculed, marginalized, and/or declared “fringe” and “unelectable”
To any close political observer it is obvious that the mass media has completely abandoned its obligation to journalism and its role in a democracy by actively going out of its way to circumvent the campaign of someone truly challenging the elite establishment. The mass media grossly failed America as well.
The last line of defense for preserving a democracy and the interests of the people are the people themselves and, perhaps most sadly of all, they have been conditioned to supporting the destructive elite establishment as well.
It is simply astonishing that a Christian nation which claims to honor God’s commandments supports establishment candidates who stand for rushing into pre-emptive wars built on deliberate lies and false slogans to create massive suffering, hatred, and terrorism, as a first resort.
It is simply astonishing that Tea Party members who came together to cut federal spending are voting for establishment candidates as opposed to Ron Paul who not only presents the only serious plan to carry this out but has been the only candidate who has consistently fought for such action to be taken during the past 20 years.
It is simply astonishing that OWS, with one of its main positions being to “End the Fed,” fails to support the one candidate who brought this and many other issues on behalf of the people to light due to basically fighting alone for 20 years with basically no support during much of this time.
The failure of the American people does not stem from evil but rather from perhaps the biggest irony of our lifetime: The establishment, with its supportive mass media that serves more as a cheerleader than a source of information, has been able to convince most Americans that the one candidate who speaks the documented truth, follows the good advice of our forefathers which served us so well over many decades, and supports the U.S. Constitution, is “fringe,” “unelectable,” and “dangerous.”
I still hope and pray that enough people from every segment of the population will come together in time to the save the day and elect Ron Paul as our next president. The alternative is to accept endless wars, bankruptcy, full scale Depression, and the self-destruction of a once great nation.
Posted by: AdamK101 | February 7, 2012, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Don’t confuse enthusiasm for a party with lack of trust in our overall incumbent leadership and candidate selection process. There is too much at stake in this election cycle and where constituents are looking for real ideas and programs to return our freedoms we are not inspied by any democrat or republican and repulsed by the usual approach of money and negative adds to get elected. We just need worthy leadership, not politics as usual.
Posted by: Rick | February 7, 2012, 7:02 am 7:02 am
It is time for all of us to realize that both parties are, essentially, one in the same. Yes, each has its own business masters. In the end, however, they are one in the same from our perspective. They will rob us of our tax dollars until the country falls by the way side. Once you and I fall into revolution, killing one another over food, air, water and some form of money, they will retreat into their mansions high upon the hills we all hold so sacred.
Think about it. The basis of our country is “democracy” or “republicanism.” The notion is that we have “choices” in our political leaders. Yes, we have choices. However, two big businesses control our choices: Democrats and Republicans. They divide us with their brilliant propaganda and rhetoric. They turn us against one another, fully realizing that our division is their power.
They rely upon what Gramsci termed “cultural hegemony.” One social class maintains control by manipulating the societal culture in terms of beliefs, explanations, perceptions and values so that the ruling class world view is imposed as the societal norm which is then perceived by the populous as a universally valid ideology. It becomes “common sense” that either a Democrat or Republican should be elected. It becomes “common sense” that the U.S. is somehow exceptional and that all others are inferior. It encourages the young and poor to die on the battlefields so that the old and rich may continue to live in their mansions.
This country was founded upon the protection of wealth. For well over 230 years, it has been the greatest capitalist coup in the history of humankind. So long as you and I label each other as “liberal” or “conservative,” as “Democrat” or “Republican,” as “rich” or “poor,” we empower them to commandeer our liberty, livelihood, and political well-being.
Changing parties is no different than re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. The system is rotten and corrupt.
Posted by: Dense | February 7, 2012, 7:10 am 7:10 am
The Minnesota caucuses are tonight, and I can’t be enthused about going to support ANY of the 4 remaining Republican candidates, despite my objections to the policies of President Obama. It is NOT enough just to criticize you opponent, in my view. You also have to present a credible alternative of what YOU will do to change what is going on. And NONE of the remaining GOP candidates has explained to my satisfaction anything positive that they would change from President Obama’s actions. It appears Romney may ultimately win the GOP nomination purely as a result of a war of attrition fought with vast sums of money, but I don’t think he will be able to draw enough of a difference form the President policy wise to give the majority of voters a reason to vote out the sitting President in November.
Posted by: MNResident | February 7, 2012, 7:25 am 7:25 am
This year the GOP has the biggest chance to take back the White House and Senate, but AS USUAL they are shooting themselves in the foot. This current group of candidates do NOT inspire any enthusiasm whatsoever. Romney is basically an 0bama-lite. Once again the GOP establishment has let the party down, this time they may not recover. There is strong talk of many people leaving the party, this time it may be real. Once a strong 3rd party gets going you can kiss the GOP goodbye.
Posted by: Tim | February 7, 2012, 7:33 am 7:33 am
I think everyone is paying attention but frankly we are tired of all politicians. In addition to all the commercials for this candidtae or that we get the added “bonus’ of seeing Obamas face on the major news outlets every time he burps.
Posted by: david | February 7, 2012, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Here’s the truth; the establishment Republicans will not support Ron Paul due to his anti-war stance. Even though 68% of Americans are also oppose to war, the Republican party wants to ignore this information. Candidates like Rick Santorum are actually threatening to go to war with Iran. This will be an easy win for Obama thanks to the denial by Republicans that most Americans are anti-war and will not support a candidate that is so eager to go to war.
Posted by: Cam | February 7, 2012, 7:45 am 7:45 am
The enthusiasm is gone because people are sick of all the negativity that goes along with politics. And we’ve been listening to the negativity from the right since the day after the election in 2008!
Posted by: Working_Class | February 7, 2012, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Actually it’s normal to see that far right ideologues who do little more than pander to a radical base with promises of making contraception illegal, pledges to compromise previously held mainstream positions merely to please the base, and who present schemes for the moon that even the base thinks are stupid all combine to make mainstream republicans stay at home. That makes perfect sense. Of course the health of the political system in DC is sickeningly corrupt, and that is why the candidates the wealthy power brokers stand up are so crushingly out of touch with either voters or with reality. They need people they can control, not who think for themselves. It’s a disconnect, plain and simple. Disaffected Rep’s don’t want to vote for anybody, nor should they.
Posted by: sameagain | February 7, 2012, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Enthusiasm? No. Intelligence, yes.
Posted by: Aaron Ververs | February 7, 2012, 8:25 am 8:25 am
There will be a big PROBLEM with me if Romney wins the nomination. When I found out that he was running again, I nearly broke down and cried. Twitty Mitty is ho-hum, he’s boring, he’s lackluster, he’s an elitist who’s doing nothing but stoking his ego. I much prefer either Gingrich or Santorum. They’ll give Obumma a better run for his money. The polls already indicate that Obumma would beat Romney in the general election. That said, if Twitty Mitty wins, I will stay home on election day and drink beer while I see Obumma win a second term.
Posted by: Gerry | February 7, 2012, 8:53 am 8:53 am
The media keeps trying to push this idea. Any of the candidates would be a breath of fresh air and the savor of this country. People are just waiting for the real election in November and watch them come out of the wood work to vote out Obama.
Posted by: Freedom | February 7, 2012, 9:30 am 9:30 am
83% of Florida republicans did not vote for Mitt Romney
67% of Nevada republicans did not vote for Mitt Romney
He spent close to $30,000,000 on these two primaries and this was the result. Is this guy a business man?
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 10:00 am 10:00 am
The problem with the GOP is divided loyalty.
Any Senator that signed a pledge to a lobbyist, is a traitor to the USA. Grover Nordquist is a lobbyist—
the only document any politician should sign an oath too is the Constitution.hence, the Freshman,GOP, tea party (Never raise taxes) politicians are traitors.
Posted by: Brian | February 7, 2012, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“Is the Republican Party Facing an Enthusiasm Gap?”
An enthusiasm gap, an intelligence gap, a sanity gap, and a reality gap.
Posted by: A Cynic | February 7, 2012, 10:51 am 10:51 am
BRIAN
You’re absolutely right. I’ve been saying for years that anyone who signs an oath in violation of their oath of office should be prosecuted. The military can’t do it, neither should these republicans.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 10:56 am 10:56 am
FREEDOM: Any of the candidates would be a breath of fresh air and the savor of this country. People are just waiting for the real election in November
ALL of the candidates are like leftover trash IMO. The WHOLE nation is NOT happy with any of these poor, pityful candidates. You have one Rich man that changes his position like the moon in the sky does, another is an old horse that is SO unliked even by his OWN party that he can NEVER win against the President but SOME people love him simply because he can be so darn NASTY, next we have a Fairly decent man who is a religious fanatic that turns off a pile of folks, and then we have a person that makes oh so much sense UNTIL it comes to our foreign affairs and a couple of minor things here in the USA. IF I were a Republican I would NOT be voting at all this year because the WHOLE bunch is just an embarrassment to the party. Run whichever is the BEST you’ve got and we’ll see President Obama taking the oath in 2013!
Posted by: demNme5 | February 7, 2012, 11:12 am 11:12 am
The majority of republicans have veered to far right, the debt debacle was a sign of things to come if they have too much control of our government. People have short term memories, right now, it appears that we have diametrically opposed ideologues attempting to sway us in both directions, but the right has gone too extreme and is dangerous to the safety of this nation.
Posted by: emerald_sparks | February 7, 2012, 11:14 am 11:14 am
History repeats itself but nobody reads or listens. If by some time warp we were transported by to 1930 and 1931, we’d see the only difference is the costumes.
The republicans in 1930 and 1931 tried to do the same thing to FDR as they are doing to President Obama today. They immediately forgot about Herbert Hoover, delayed and obstructed every program that helped working Americans, and said FDR was a dictator and a socialist.
Luckily for FDR and America, these republicans were thrown out of office and FDR got a Congress he could work with. That’s why he was re-elected three times.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Is the Republican Party Facing an Enthusiasm Gap? No, that’s just what our liberal buias media says.
Believe me, there is plenty of enthusiaim to get rid of the worst President in history.
Posted by: The Snake | February 7, 2012, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
ALL of the candidates are like leftover trash IMO. The WHOLE nation is NOT happy with any of these poor, pityful candidates.really, and they just can’t wait for four more years of change we thought we could believe in. You obviously don’t pay taxes.
Posted by: The Snake | February 7, 2012, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Two Words. Sarah Palin. The base would be fired up, and you would have record numbers of people going to the polls to vote for her.
Posted by: DJ | February 7, 2012, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
The republicans are desperate. They know the Bush administration got us into this mess. They also know that if President Obama is re-elected and we come out of this recession, they will be out of power for the next 50 years just like after the great depression. They will say or do anything to prevent that.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I am voting for ABO in Nov – Anyone but Obama.
Until then I am voting for ABR – ANyone but ROmney.
Posted by: retired military | February 7, 2012, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Believe me, the republicans will do what we have to do to beat Obama. Lets see who our nominee is, then we will get behind him 100%….
ABO… ABO….
ONE-Term…. Obama is destroying American properity.
Posted by: vicky Bennett | February 7, 2012, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
NO, the republicans are not desperate! Obama is desperate, he has nothing to run on, so he and the Leftwing media are GOING TO MAKE IT UP AS THEY GO ALONG!
ABO. ABO.. ABO…………………………….
Posted by: shoppegirl | February 7, 2012, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Everytime Obama comes out with another socialist proclamation taking away our guaranteed freedoms and undermining our Constitution it’s not only Republicans who are enthusastic about voting him out of office but also the radical wing of the Democrat Party along with him.
Posted by: Karen | February 7, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Obama the destroyer cannot be allowed to continue and his Democrat buddies have got to go as well. The enthusiasm to defeat Obama is becoming universal. He is a liar and a cheat along with the entire Democrat/Socialist Party. Ask Bart Stupack how he feels today as the sell out.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2012, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Well, I wish they were making it up as they go along, but this is all a very well coordinated strategy with the leftwing press and the Obama campaign.
Note the ABC poll – a telephone poll with negatives about Romney included in the script – was conducted to give Obama a lead? Note his Dept of Labor Statistics dropped a record 1,200,000 Americans off the unemployment rolls so they could show a drop in the unemployment rate?
No, this has ALL BEEN CAREFULLY ORCHASTRATED.
Posted by: tpaine | February 7, 2012, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Enthusiasm? What is lacking in enthusiasm is the leading candidate. What he lacks is integrity. You don’t know what this guy stands for or just like Obama, it seems it is all about the power of the office. Mitt seems like a fine fellow but he certainly doesn’t feel in his gut that there is something intrinsically wrong that more government can’t fix. He does not have the enthusiasm, conviction and voice for this fight that is coming up and people aren;t stupid. We see it, feel it and hear it and the lack of enthusiam is projected by the candidate, his campaign, the message and without a doubt the even handed, soft delivery of his speeches. He simply isn’t ticked off enough and that is the time we are in, being pretty damn ticked off as to why we are where we are today.
It is all governments fault and Mitt well he kinda, maybe, possibly agrees just a little.
Posted by: TheAntiProgressive | February 7, 2012, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Democrats are confusing GOP apathy with the primary with apathy come November. Many people, such as myself know that we’re voting for whomever the GOP candidate will be opposing Obama.
Romney, Newt & Santorum may have their differences, but those are measured with a micrometer when compared to Obama’s policies are miles away from our own.
Posted by: Tom Genin | February 7, 2012, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Is the Republican Party Facing an Enthusiasm Gap? No – But ABC News is.
Posted by: CamillusUSA | February 7, 2012, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Look at the diversity of the crowd in that photo! I see brown hair, blonde hair, grey hair, and bald people. They are catholics, baptists, evangelicals, pentacostals, even a mormon.
Posted by: Robert | February 7, 2012, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Is R Party Facing an Enthusiasm Gap?
NO
Posted by: FLguy | February 7, 2012, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
To protect our country from four more years of our Incompetent-In-Chief, you’ll see GOP turnout like you’ve NEVER seen before.
Posted by: tpaine | February 7, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I know at least one thing about Mitt Romney (perhaps only one). Since he was born, he has not spent a single, solitary day as a normal, average American. He was born rich, stayed rich, and set up a $100 million trust fund for his kids (so they can be hopelessly out of touch as well). People want a president to help address the problems of everyday Americans. So why would you vote for a guy whose never faced any of them?
Posted by: bigfoot9p6 | February 7, 2012, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Everyone seems to forget the 2010 election cycle. In Obama’s own words, a shellacking. Has Obama adjusted politically in any way to counter those results?
Posted by: tom chicago | February 7, 2012, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Romney is no Ronald Reagan, and never will be, period. In fact, he is the antithesis of Ronald Reagan and Reagan Conservatism.
Romney and his policies, are liberal to the core. So in fact, he, Romney, is exactly like Obama in almost every aspect. More so than Hillary is. In fact, Obama, Hillary, and Romney are the exactly same political liberal socialist animal, with the exact same liberal policies and agenda-Obamacare, Romneycare, and Hillarycare. ie; each of them created their force mandated State Socialized Medicine program- all of their own liberal socialist making. And of all the politicians running for the Republican Party Nomination, only Speaker Newt Gingrich stopped it.
Romney said publically on the record, that he was and is, an independent progressive Republican, who disliked and did not support Reagan and Reagan conservative policies, political and economic. In other words he is liberal Republican Party establishment RINO elitist.. and that is NOT like President Ronald Reagan, period.
So Romney’s so called pretentious, disingenuous and disgustingly absurd attempt to portray and paint himself in the light of President Ronald Reagan, is without a doubt, the most egregious and outrageous disgusting display of hypocrisy and fraud, I have ever seen in anyone, let alone in this Political Republican party race.
Romney is not only a liberal politician, but he is truly a political pariah.. He runs his politics, like he ran Bain Capital.
Romney and his lies, makes me, and every true patriotic Reagan Conservative in America, want to puke from the disgusting stink of hypocrisy and propagandist lies, that Mr Romney reeks of.
With that being said- Why is it, and how is it, with an anti-Obama electoral atmosphere so high, from his ultra liberal socialist policies, that have all but bankrupted the nation.. why in heaven would anyone in the Conservative Republican voting public, would want to elect Romney, whose policies are almost exactly the same as Obama’s, almost to verbatim. Why..
This is the troubling question that seems to be so troubling, as the reason and logic of it, just escapes any and all reason and logic. In other words, it make absolutely no sense at all.. It’s the same as saying Hillary would be better for the nation, because she is Hillary, regardless of her exact same political policies and ideological philosophy. Just like Romney and his liberal socialist policies and agenda, which are all on public record for all to see, but the media refuses to report on.. It just make absolutely no sense whatsoever..
It’s not their words so much, as their actions of public record, not their public persona and perception, which is opposite of the truth. Romney created and signed into law, a forced mandated State Socialized Medicine program, aka, Romneycare, before there was even an Obama and Obamacare..
Newt stopped the very same State Socialized Medicine program in the 1990′s called Hillarycare, under Bill Clinton.. not to mention Newt balanced the Federal Budget 3 years in a row, also forcing Bill Clinton to reform welfare, as well as cut taxes across the board, lowered govt. spending, and so on..
Newt’s actual record, to his public persona, he is actually conservative and a great leader, just different in his style and tact, who has accomplished so much for this nation, second only to Ronald Reagan. That’s why the GOP RINO establishment hates the Tea Party Reagan Conservatives, because we are not their puppets on a RINO Party string, who toes the liberal GOP RINO Party line, like Romney..
So why would anyone believe that Romney would repeal Obamacare, let alone believe he is a conservative.. because he said so..
They are is so naive and gullible, it’s almost laughable,, if it weren’t so tragic. Well, I guess if you have enough money and the political machinery behind you, you can deceive anyone, . How easily the majority of the voters can be fooled, as evidenced with Obama, and now Romney.
Posted by: Sonny119 | February 7, 2012, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Reagan Conservatives are not now, nor have they ever been, or will we ever be, attracted to Romney as a Conservative candidate, let alone any other candidate, because he is not a conservtive, period. He is just another liberal Republcian Party RINO establishment elitist, like the Bush’s. This is why there is no entusiasm in the GOP race, where RRomney is massing a massive anti-newt campaign, to buy the Republican Party Noimination votes, via his GOP establishment apparatus and corporate donors like Goldman Sach’s, filling his coffer with contributions.
And when ones says, “well then why did they, the Reagan conservatives, vote for the Bush’s for the last 3 times the Republican Party held the Presidency”.. I say, because of the Bush’s connection to Ronald Reagan. Just like people gravitate to a son of a great leader, like JFK and JFK Jr., in hopes of getting some of the same qualities, leadership, and policies, they loved so much in the original person. The Bush’s, 41 and his son 43, were neither charismatic, nor all that conservative. They were the standard GOP flag bearing Republican party elitists. But, they were considered a safe vote, only because of their connection to President Ronald Reagan. That’s all.. It’s the connection.
Posted by: Sonny119 | February 7, 2012, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
The headline today should be the rebulican low turn out in all three states. 80% of republicans didn’t vote for any of the candidates.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 8, 2012, 8:49 am 8:49 am