Feb 2, 2012 2:56pm

Mitt Romney’s Very Poor Answer on ‘Very Poor’

gty mitt romney dm 110602 wblog Mitt Romneys Very Poor Answer on Very Poor

J.D. Pooley/Getty Images

Mitt Romney’s post-Florida interview where he expressed a lack of concern about the “very poor” was an instant-clanker, certain to be revived alongside similar only slightly out-of-context quotes about Romney liking being able to fire people and the personhood of corporations.

But to many a conservative ear, that soundbyte wasn’t the worst part of his answer. That fact speaks to the difficulty Romney will continue to have in wooing his party’s conservative base – and provides a window into the animating philosophy of a candidate who’s running on his Mr. Fix-It credentials.

The part that really grated on conservative activists and thought leaders was his rationale for why he’s not particularly concerned about the plight of the poor. Romney went on to explain – and explain, and explain as the day went on – that the poor are and should be taken care of by the “safety net” of federal programs.

“I said I’m not concerned about the very poor that have the safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them,” Romney said.

To many conservatives, this is simply the wrong answer for a Republican to give. It’s Democrats who rely on a social safety net, they argue. Republicans who believe in pro-growth conservative policies like to say their ideas will help everyone and don’t divide based on class, much less rely on government programs.

“This is bad,” conservative columnist and commentator Charles Krauthammer said Wednesday night on Fox News Channel’s “Special Report.” “The real problem here is that he doesn’t have a fluency with conservative ideas. … The moral case for conservative economics is that our policies are going to help everybody, including the poor.”

“The poor, after all, have food stamps and Medicaid,” added conservative blogger Erick Erickson. “But don’t worry. If the safety net is broken, Patrician Mitt Romney will fix it so the poor can stay comfortably poor.”

Tweeted anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist: “Hey Romney: Conservatives care about the poor. They are first victims of statism. We want them to have jobs, savings, property: become Rs.”

Romney remains overwhelmingly likely to win the Republican nomination. But the Republican base remains overwhelmingly likely to be suspicious of Romney, because of an ideology that seems rooted in his background as a problem-solver far more than in conservative doctrine and principles.

This may help Romney in the general election. But his rivals are pouncing in the primary.

“What it shows of Gov. Romney is that he looks at the poor differently. That being poor is a disability,” Rick Santorum said Wednesday.

Newt Gingrich today was even more direct: “I’m for replacing the safety net with a trampoline.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

This is what happens when Willard goes off script and doesn’t have a teleprompter nearby to read from. We get his true feelings.

Posted by: A Cynic | February 2, 2012, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Mitt Romney should have said:

“I’m concerned about Americans. I’m not concerned about very poor “Americans” because I will make sure they move into the middle class and won’t need a safety net”

He went with his instincts instead and his true elitism was exposed.

Posted by: tmferretti | February 2, 2012, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Mitt Romney is dedicated to ARAMCO and a high price for gasoline. He does not care about the starving people on this planet. He only wants to please his Arab OIl Sheikh and aggressive hedge funds in Switzerland.

Posted by: dustin95sc | February 2, 2012, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

tm everyone knew what he meant other than oppurtunist dems who think we didnt know what he meant. frankly he is right. 49% pay no federal income tax

Posted by: catman | February 2, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

If Obama, he would say “YES. WE CAN.” It turned out “NONE WE CAN.” As Ramney, he just being honest. He did say if there is a hole in the system, he will fix it. OK. I think an elementary student knew to read the whole sentence (not half) to understand the meaning of the sentence.

Posted by: Judy | February 2, 2012, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Mitt’s words are almost as bad as saying at a “prayer breakfast” that taxing the rich is what Jesus would do! Mitt has admitted that his comments were poorly worded but President Obama has not apologized for speaking for Jesus!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | February 2, 2012, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Remember a few weeks back when Romney challenged Perry to bet “Ten thousand dollars” on something during one of the televised debates? That proved just how out of touch with real working people Romney actually is. To him ten thousand dollars is chump change, pocket money, tip money, money to bet on golf holes, money for speakers for his home stereo. Romney has no idea which income groups define the very poor, poor, or middle class…..but he is still a lot better choice than exposed weasel Newt Gingrich…BTW, the 49% who do not pay federal income tax includes not just the legitimate poor, but those working stiffs who are able to use the system to zero out their tax debt year after year.

Posted by: munster42 | February 2, 2012, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Last week there was a report that a “working” family of four had less expendable money than a similar family with no workers! The working family income needed to exceed $60k/year before they were able to benefit from their labor. Mitt Romney says that this is not fair!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | February 2, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Remember when Conservatives at least pretended to be compassionate? Now their leading candidate is campaigning on the fact that he doesn’t give a damn about the poor! Jesus didn’t just weep, he puked.

Posted by: thomas | February 2, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

The GOP candidate is out of touch and extremely dangerous for America. He does not even know if the safety net is broken and more importantly he does not care. Forget him! President Obama is our best for 2012 — he will keep all his promises! Just watch and see the economy continue to improve and our deficit begin to go down despite GOP obstructionism.

Posted by: VAL | February 3, 2012, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.