Nevada’s a Romney Romp

Gerald Herbert/AP Photo
Mitt Romney romped in the Nevada caucuses with a leg up from his Mormon co-religionists, but also with winning margins across faith groups — evangelicals included — and a knockout even among the very conservative voters with whom he’s struggled elsewhere.
His calling card: defeating Barack Obama. In this entrance poll, analyzed for ABC by Langer Research Associates, more than four in 10 caucus-goers named it as the most important candidate attribute in their vote, and those who did backed Romney by a smashing 74-18 percent over Newt Gingrich. That’s Romney’s best to date among beat-Obama voters.
Romney’s rough spots on this cruise were few, but notable. He was crushed among the truest of the true conservatives, the 17 percent of caucus-goers who said they cared most about the candidate with the best conservative credentials. Forty-five percent in this group supported Ron Paul, 31 percent Gingrich, 19 percent Rick Santorum — leaving a mere 5 percent for Romney.
He also lost self-identified independents to Paul, ran only about evenly with Paul among voters under age 30, split those with incomes under $30,000 a year and won strong supporters of the Tea Party political movement much more narrowly than other groups, by 9 points over Gingrich.
Still, Romney overachieved essentially everywhere else, and in much larger groups — albeit in what by any standard was a lightly attended event (only about 50,000 voters were expected), and in a state in which he won easily, with 51 percent of the vote, in 2008.
Mormons made up 26 percent of caucus participants Saturday, about the same as their share in Nevada in 2008 and far more than in previous contests this year. Ninety-one percent of them voted for Romney; Mormons accounted for more than four in 10 of his total votes.
But Romney also easily outpaced Gingrich among evangelicals, 45-29 percent, his best showing by far in this group to date. As such it was essentially inconsequential that, at 27 percent of the electorate, evangelicals were much less numerous than in most previous 2012 Republican events. They accounted for 65 percent, 57 percent, and 47 percent in South Carolina, Iowa and Florida, respectively. (One in six Mormons identified themselves as evangelicals. Among non-Mormon evangelicals, Romney and Gingrich split the vote, 35-33 percent.)
While light on evangelicals, Nevada was rich in “very” conservatives, 48 percent of caucus-goers, rivaled only in Iowa. As with evangelicals, Romney has struggled among very conservatives elsewhere, losing them in all previous contests save New Hampshire. He won them in Nevada by 2-1 over Gingrich.
And while Romney got hammered among the one in six looking mainly for a “true conservative,” he stormed back among other groups. In addition to the big beat-Obama vote, he beat Gingrich by 23 points among voters looking for the candidate with the best experience, and Paul by 23 points among those focused on “strong moral character.” The latter group, one in five voters, has been a weak one for the thrice-married Gingrich.
Gingrich and Paul battled for second place. Paul won self-identified independents, consistently a better group for him, by 48 percent to 31 percent over Romney; Paul’s misfortune was that independents accounted for just 18 percent of voters in the caucuses, which were open only to registered Republicans.
Paul and Romney were even among voters under age 30, but they accounted for just 8 percent of the turnout. Seniors, customarily a strong Romney group, accounted for 35 percent of caucus-goers, and backed him over Gingrich by 59 percent to 25 percent, with just 11 percent for Paul.
Among income groups, voters with household incomes less than $30,000 a year split three ways among Romney, Gingrich and Paul — but made up just 10 percent of Nevada voters. Romney won 48 percent of those in the $30,000 to $50,000 range, and 60 percent of those better off.
While Romney won strong Tea Party supporters by just 9 points, that itself was a major improvement from the previous two GOP contests. He lost this group to Gingrich by 12 points in Florida, and by 27 points in South Carolina.
A challenge for Gingrich was the narrow base of his support: Six in 10 of his voters were very conservatives, and two-thirds were strong Tea Party supporters. Paul, in turn, got 44 percent of his support from independents — a tough profile for a Republican candidate.
Finally, entrance poll results indicated that Romney did particularly well in Clark County, home to Las Vegas and more than half of all caucus-goers. He did similarly well in Clark County in 2008, but this year that score might be a particular message to Gingrich, whose most prominent financial backer, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, calls Las Vegas home.
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Here are four things Romney has said:
“I am not concerned about the poor.”
“I like to fire people.”
“I’d like to make a $10,000 bet.”
“Corporations are people.”
Posted by: tom | February 5, 2012, 7:46 am 7:46 am
Wagering on Romney in Nevada was an easy bet but wagering on Romney as president of USA is another bet.
Posted by: Girish | February 5, 2012, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Now if Nevada could only get rid of Harry Reid next time around.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 5, 2012, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Voter turnout was very low.
Posted by: deb | February 5, 2012, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Just look at the corporate donors for Romeny and Obama. Not much difference there and not much difference in policies. We have a spending problem.
Posted by: Lengrady75 | February 5, 2012, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Yeah, but tons of difference in business experience.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 5, 2012, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Russia backs Iran. Newt and Romney want military action. It’s insanity. Romney’s plan for the US, cut safety nets for the poor, and double military spending. We spend 60x more now than anybody per year. Fiscal responsibility is a joke, this will create more debt than we saw under Bush and Obama combined. Romney’s business experience is manipulating the system to their favor while everyone else suffers and bears the cost.
Posted by: DL | February 5, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am
If Romney is really most concerned about the middle class (as he stated he is) then he needs to start telling me how he’s going to stop the tidal wave of outsourcing of American jobs by healthy corporations. I work for Verizon, a healthy company, but that is not stopping them from outsourcing jobs like crazy and also trying to take away employees pensions and healthcare. oh yeah and they’re getting tax refunds while doing this!! Where are any politicians that are really representing the middle class? Is Romney really the guy who’s gonna stand up to the greedy corporate execs? I’m sceptical about that.
Posted by: truedat | February 5, 2012, 11:45 am 11:45 am
If Americans vote based on results, they’ll put Roseanne Barr in the Oval Office before they’ll give Obama another four years. Let’s hope Americans have been paying attention.
Posted by: s | February 5, 2012, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
my grandmother taught me to read the HOLY BIBLE , this romney does not and that is a fact.
Posted by: mipolitic | February 5, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Let’s face it, it was a no-brainer for Romney – Nevada has the second largest population of Mormons in the US.
Posted by: pksk531 | February 5, 2012, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Yeah, but tons of difference in business experience.————————Romney’s main “business experience ” is firing a lot of hard working family people so he and other ultra rich crony execs (aka 1% ers ) can get a(nother) generally undeserved pay raise /golden parachute , aka “vulture capitalism ” .That’s been SOP for corporate America every since elitist conservatives like Nixon / Reagan and the conservative Supreme court they built let Big Business know that the US govt. would have their back vis a vis patently and tacitly pro-business legislation no matter what , even if it meant screwing over 99% of the other Americans . The DOW is nearly doubled since one R trashed the economy and the GDP is showing steady growth with unemployment numbers falling as well . Why disrupt that positive trend for a patently sleazy devil you don’t know who is just offering more of the same failed Bush / Cheney right winger b/s double talk ? Nope , no way Ray . 4 more for Obama . Then if things aren’t better we should seriously reconsider all options . But Bush2 had 2 terms and made a terrible mess and most on the right hardly even complained even as the economy tanked ( and gas was + $4 ) so I don’t see why Mr. Obama doesn’t deserve at least that much , particularly as the economy has made a 180 degree turnaround since he took office . Also under his direct leadership as CIC we got OBL and took out many of the top terrorist leader as well. He’s a good and decent Christian family man and a strong president , and the right makes themselves look more and more stupid and irrelevant the more they ignore those obvious facts and drink the oh so tasty ( but brain killing ) FOX kool aid.
Posted by: davem | February 5, 2012, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Who am I kidding…nobody wants the arrogant, condescending failed used car salesman we have for president to have a second term
Posted by: davem | February 5, 2012, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Would it be too much to ask for ABC News to actually investigate the ongoing debacle in Nevada concering Clark County? There seems to be some kind of confusion/mischief/fraud going on in the counting of a very important county and no one is talking about it. What gives?
Posted by: ODIrony | February 5, 2012, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I didn’t know he sold cars…that explains some things. I knew he once served ice cream.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 5, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
DaveM; You are such a sycophant. Bush was a bad leader because he didn’t have the political will to stop a congress hell bent on social engineering. He was responsible because he didn’t stop people like Frank, Dodd, and Waters. Both sides engaged in it including some of the more famous Democrats. I won’t bother to go through the list. They’ve been pointed out on these boards for quite a few years. A couple have now road off into the sunset. Bush had the final say, and he did nothing, even though he was warned. Just do a little research. What continues to amaze me is the liberal Left, like you sir, who continue with the same worn out talking points including the meaningless FOX koolaid crap. BTW, I hear they make a solvent now that can be used to remove those superglued blinders.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 5, 2012, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Yeah, but tons of difference in business experience.————————Romney’s main “business experience ” is firing a lot of hard working family people so he and other ultra rich crony execs (aka 1% ers ) can get a(nother) generally undeserved pay raise /golden parachute , aka “vulture capitalism ” .That’s been SOP for corporate America every since elitist conservatives like Nixon / Reagan and the conservative Supreme court they built let Big Business know that the US govt. would have their back vis a vis patently and tacitly pro-business legislation no matter what , even if it meant screwing over 99% of the other Americans . The DOW is nearly doubled since one R trashed the economy and the GDP is showing steady growth with unemployment numbers falling as well . Why disrupt that positive trend for a patently sleazy devil you don’t know who is just offering more of the same failed Bush / Cheney right winger b/s double talk ? Nope , no way Ray . 4 more for Obama . Then if things aren’t better we should seriously reconsider all options . But Bush2 had 2 terms and made a terrible mess and most on the right hardly even complained even as the economy tanked ( and gas was + $4 ) so I don’t see why Mr. Obama doesn’t deserve at least that much , particularly as the economy has made a 180 degree turnaround since he took office . Also under his direct leadership as CIC we got OBL and took out many of the top terrorist leader as well. He’s a good and decent Christian family man and a strong president , and the right makes themselves look more and more stupid and irrelevant the more they ignore those obvious facts and drink the oh so tasty ( but brain killing ) FOX kool aid.
Posted by: daviem | February 5, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
But but but Bush……
Posted by: daviem | February 5, 2012, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm