Obama Campaign Jumps on Romney Comments on ‘the Very Poor’

(Image Credit: Charles Dharapak/AP Photo)
Fresh off his victory in the Florida primary, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney handed his Democratic opponents a new quote for them to use in such a way as to suggest he’s a heartless rich guy, the caricature Democrats are determined to draw of him.
In an interview this morning on CNN, anchor Soledad O’Brien asked Romney about a new poll indicating that when it comes to “understanding the needs of average Americans,” President Obama scored 55 percent while he merited 39 percent.
Romney said voters want to elect someone who “actually knows how it takes to improve their life, get home values rising again, to get jobs again in this country, and to make sure when soldiers come home they have a job waiting for them. And make sure people who are retired don’t have to worry about what’s going to happen at the end of the week.”
He added: “I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich, they’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90, 95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling, and I’ll continue to take that message across the nation.” Before lunch, Obama 2012 campaign manager Jim Messina had tweeted: ”So much for ‘we’re all in this together.’ Romney today: ‘I’m not concerned about the very poor’”
O’Brien had pressed Romney to explain what he meant. “You just said I’m not concerned about the very poor because they have a safety net. And I think there are lots of very poor Americans who are struggling who would say that sounds odd. Can you explain that?”
“Well, you had to finish the sentence, Soledad. I said I’m not concerned about the very poor that have the safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them…The – the challenge right now – we will hear from the Democrat Party the plight of the poor, and – and there’s no question. It’s not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor. But my campaign is focused on middle-income America. My campaign – you can choose where to focus. You can focus on the rich. That’s not my focus. You can focus on the very poor. That’s not my focus. My focus is on middle income Americans, retirees living on social security, people who cannot find work, folks who have kids that are getting ready to go to college. That – these are the people who’ve been most badly hurt during the Obama years.”
However Romney meant the comment, as with “I like being able to fire people” – which in context he meant about consumers being able to choose insurance companies – the Obama campaign may be caricaturing Romney, but the former Massachusetts governor is handing them the magic markers.
-Jake Tapper

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
“I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor”.
Aren’t the very poor Americans too? Typical republican response, love America but hate Americans. This guy will self-destruct quicker than Newt.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 1, 2012, 11:33 am 11:33 am
with the amount of lies republicans regularly make about Obama, and the amount of unpatriotic hatred that they express towards Obama and democrats as a whole, the republicans should be glad that democrats only fiddle with the context of their remarks.
Posted by: James | February 1, 2012, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Thanks Mitt!
Posted by: herbissimo | February 1, 2012, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Even his explanation was damning to this man; ” It’s not good being poor, and we have a safety net to help those that are very poor. But my campaign is focused on middle-income America. My campaign – you can choose where to focus. You can focus on the rich. That’s not my focus. You can focus on the very poor. That’s not my focus.” I would certainly hope that his focus would be the poor. With unemployment at what it is today, there are a great many poor people in America. Romney also states, “My focus is on middle income Americans, retirees living on social security, people who cannot find work, folks who have kids that are getting ready to go to college.” Ask any American who is unemployed, middle class or poor, with kids, if they can afford to send their children to college. My guess is the answer will be, no. Meaning that once again Mitt is out of touch with reality when it comes to the common man. He still only see’s money, not people.
Posted by: Kateeb | February 1, 2012, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
You need to read his entire comment in order to not misunderstand what he’s saying. But, wow, does Romney suffer from a tin ear. Or is it a tin mouth? He does damage to himself so quickly.
Posted by: AmericanLady | February 1, 2012, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
TM… So what is President Obama focused on, making us all equally poor??? More unemployment, more housing foreclosures, more plant closings, more bankruptcies, more money lost in the solar, wind and battery industries, more spending to get the Union vote, more debt, more government intervention in private industry, more deterioration of personal freedoms, etc. etc.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 1, 2012, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
“I said I’m not concerned about the very poor that have the safety net, but if it has holes in it, I will repair them…” —————-I call prototypical conservative b/s. Conservatives are consistently and regularly the ones trying their best to disassemble / weaken that safety net , not reinforce it or make it better .
This guy ( like all the other RNC losers ) will say whatever it takes to win .
Posted by: davem | February 1, 2012, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
Yes we know Mitt, that is why the GOP does all it can to save the top 1%….oops the top 1% have a safety net…its called the Republicans.
Posted by: MiketheElectrician | February 1, 2012, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Aren’t the very poor Americans too?
Of course they are. The difference between most of us is that we want the poor not to be poor as opposied to a party, in particularly the Democrats, that wants to keep a stable of poor around for their votes and to keep Government on its endless expansion” to fix the poor” with fresh union paid Governemt workers.
Posted by: david | February 1, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“oops the top 1% have a safety net…its called the Republicans.”
For every dollar that a member of President Obama’s campaign finance committee contributed to his campaign, that member’s company has received nearly $25,000 from the Obama administration. How’s that for a return on investment?
Posted by: foggy | February 1, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
LIZZIE
We were all in the same boat the day President Bush and his administration decided to de-regulate Wall Street and the financial institutions, and yes some dumb democrats went along with it.
President Obama, I believe, honestly cares about the poor and middle class in this country. Every program he has proposed helps the middle class. 26 companies out of 28 funded in the same program as Solyndra are prospering and hiring thousands on people to supply lithium batteries to the auto industry.
Don’t tell me your one of the 11% that approve of the job Congress is doing. You have to admit he hasn’t had a hell of a lot to work with.
Come on, you have to think he even sings better than Mitt
Posted by: tmferretti | February 1, 2012, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
“We were all in the same boat the day President Bush and his administration decided to de-regulate Wall Street and the financial institutions, and yes some dumb democrats went along with it.”
Good lord, man, wikipedia is back online. Better yet, spend the 19 dollars on Reckless Endangerment and read it. Don’t post such ignorant nonsense when you don’t have to.
Posted by: foggy | February 1, 2012, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Romney put his foot in his mouth on that one. he deserves to have Obama beat him up over it.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 1, 2012, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
“For every dollar that a member of President Obama’s campaign finance committee contributed to his campaign, that member’s company has received nearly $25,000 from the Obama administration.” ————–It would be nice if , just occasionally , folks on the right would post some sort of reference or link when they make such remarks . I guess it’s because usually they are just lying and have no proof or facts to present in making their weak tea case(s) , like all conservatives do as second nature when arguing or debating or discussing most anything under the Sun . It must be genetic , but however it manifests itself it’s (i.e. lying as main personality trait ) something that is intrinsic to being a conservative evidently .
Posted by: davem | February 1, 2012, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
TM…. Solar and battery companies filing for bankruptcies, but we’re doing well. You might want to ask the poor who where denied hospital care in Chicago, what they think about the Obamas after
Mrs.Obama and David Axelrod got paid hundreds of thousands to improve the bottom line, and poor people are just a drain. But now they are for the poor, yea keep them poor and dependent on government.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 1, 2012, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Oh please, save us from that horrible monster Obama. We’re scared. Help us Mitty. Help us!
Posted by: Juniper | February 1, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Success of American is not the result of smarter people or better education it is from people willing to take risks. Those people who have their “skin in the game” will do their best to succeed while those who expect “big government” to do all of the thinking do only the minimum necessary. President Obama is doing his best to vilify those who innovate and are successful! He has no clue why his “big government” approach promotes mediocrity!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | February 1, 2012, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
““For every dollar that a member of President Obama’s campaign finance committee contributed to his campaign, that member’s company has received nearly $25,000 from the Obama administration.” ————–It would be nice if , just occasionally , folks on the right would post some sort of reference or link when they make such remarks .”
Ever occur to you to look it up yourself instead of complain?
Peter Schweizer’s Throw Them All Out is the source. It’s not a book that the left has embraced.
Posted by: foggy | February 1, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
What Romney said is entirely accurate.Our aid programs are set up as means-tested programs-the poorest have easy access to them,the working poor do not.as such it is easier to get on Medicaid by quitting a job than it is to try to get coverage while holding a poorly paying job while living below the poverty level.At least Romney understands the futility of the working poor seeking aid; after 3 years of Obama I see no practical evidence that our current President does.
Posted by: Nephron | February 1, 2012, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
It is not Obama’s, or Romney’s, or congress’s job to be concerned about the poor. If you are poor and are sitting on your couch waiting for the government to fix your problems for you, then you will die on the couch never having become any better off.
Posted by: BG10 | February 1, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Of course it is those very safety nets that the Republicans want to cut deeply.
Posted by: pksk531 | February 1, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Success of American is not the result of smarter people or better education it is from people willing to take risks.
Posted by: Common _ Sense | February 1, 2012, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
You mean like how Bush was willing to take the risk of going trillions of dollars in debt to the Chinese?
Posted by: Sue | February 1, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
” AL! CLEAN UP IN AISLE 6!!!”
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | February 1, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
I am not even sure what to think of Mitt anymore. So utterly c;udeless and tactless. The middle class are quickly turning into the poor and incentives he claims are there to help the poor , he want to slash entitlements so how exactly are the poor going to live in a Mitt Romney presidency?
Posted by: Yetunde Olawoyin | February 1, 2012, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
It’s not what Mitt says, it’s what he thinks that’s the problem. I’m sure he would have no problem helping a poor person.
The fact that he thinks the poor don’t need any help because of the “so-called” safety nets in place is utterly stupid. The point is we need to help them so they don’t need safety nets in the first place. They guy is totally out of touch with average Americans.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 1, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Many of the families in the Head Start Program I worked at are working poor or very poor. They get cash assistance and food stamps, some have housing and WIC as well with small children. These families often have Care4Kids and visit the food bank during the month. Even with all of these “safety nets” most of them are praying for the 1st of the month by the 20th…those safety nets are about to tear and Republicans want to cut away at the string their hanging on. Aside from the women with drug-dealing baby-daddy’s who exploit the system, most of the people using these safety nets need MORE aid which is comprehensive and holds them accountable. I don’t think “Mittens” is the right nickname for this out of touch politician…he’s wearing silk gloves and doesn’t no real labor.
Posted by: Haitiana4Obama | February 1, 2012, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Mitt knows how to fix everything!
Posted by: Sure He Does | February 1, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Somebody needs to clue Mitt into the fact that some safety net programs like Section 8 aren’t even accepting new applicants anymore (at least where I live), and food stamps can take months to process because so many workers have been laid off from the HRA! Besides that most people living in poverty are working, it’s almost impossible to find a job paying a living wage these days even with a college education.
Posted by: Wa | February 1, 2012, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
The USA is the only country in the world where a huge percentage of the so called “poor” are obese, have TVs and cable, and are provided food and medicine along with meals at their schools for their children.
Posted by: George Douglas | February 1, 2012, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Ever occur to you to look it up yourself instead of complain?———————–Why should I have to look up references for YOUR patently silly assertions ? I already know you are full of it , just like all lying conservatives , as I said earlier .
Posted by: davem | February 1, 2012, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
One more comment , it is a shame that the constitution was a gift to us that has been taken away from us. Much like being lock below decks of the Titanic , we poor are completely neglected , most Public servants are wealthy lawyers that finagle the system for their own personal gain , over and over so much that we accept that like this big country of laws accepts Illegal Immingrants. What a contradiction. Yes we are becoming the McAmericans that depend on the giant corporations for food, I havent seen the dollar menu in the vegtable section yet. These mega wealthy organiztions are shaking the hands of drug companies as well . I know now at 40 my country , what ever that is , is a sad assortment takers , not givers.
Posted by: miketriggs | February 1, 2012, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
GEORGE DOUGLAS | FEBRUARY 1, 2012, 5:12 PM posted: “the so called “poor” are obese, have TVs and cable, and are provided food and medicine along with meals at their schools for their children.”
So what would the Right Wing have America do George? Replicate the Irish Potato Famine?
This kind of stuff makes my blood boil – it’s the definition of the new Republican Party: cruel, heartless, self-serving. Yeah, cut those meals at schools for kids – that will really help them learn. Make them clean the bathrooms too.
Destroying a safety net for our CHILDREN is somehow “American” for today’s mean spirited Right Wing. And Trickle Down Economics – promoting wealth for an elite few – with its accompanying deregulation, job outsourcing, environmental destruction, corporate bought politicians, and reduced workers’ wages is somehow “good” for American families and our kids’ futures.
Vote them gone.
Posted by: green.goddess | February 1, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Posted by: green.goddess | February 1, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Yawn!
Posted by: Mary | February 1, 2012, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Destroying a safety net for our CHILDREN is somehow “American” for today’s mean spirited Right Wing. And Trickle Down Economics – promoting wealth for an elite few – with its accompanying deregulation, job outsourcing, environmental destruction, corporate bought politicians, and reduced workers’ wages is somehow “good” for American families and our kids’ futures.
Vote them gone.
Posted by: green.goddess | February 1, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I’m with you, and so are many, many Americans!
Posted by: Wolf | February 1, 2012, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
I’m with you, and so are many, many Americans!
Posted by: Wolf | February 1, 2012, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Especially society’s lazy leeches.
Posted by: Dane | February 1, 2012, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Destroying a safety net for our CHILDREN is somehow “American” for today’s mean spirited Right Wing. And Trickle Down Economics – promoting wealth for an elite few – with its accompanying deregulation, job outsourcing, environmental destruction, corporate bought politicians, and reduced workers’ wages is somehow “good” for American families and our kids’ futures.
Vote them gone.
Posted by: green.goddess | February 1, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I’m with you, and so are many, many Americans
Posted by: Wolf | February 1, 2012, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Especially society’s lazy leeches.
Posted by: Dane | February 1, 2012, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
No, mostly just decent ordinary Americans who saw the disaster of Bush and the Republicans and aren’t interested in that arrogant, incompetent bunch of lags again.
Posted by: Wolf | February 1, 2012, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Everytime Willard Romney puts his foot in his mouth he says “that’s not what I meant…..” The problem with Willard “Mitt” is that he doesn’t have any idea of what he means except he wants us to vote for him. I think I’ll pass on that….
Posted by: findlayway | February 2, 2012, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Posted by: Haitiana4Obama | February 1, 2012, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
“Mittens” gives away 15% of his income (millions of dollars) to charity. Nearly all of it goes to the poor. I contribute at least 10%-20% plus volunteer hundreds of hours a year to help the poor. Before Obama was elected I contributed much more to charity (in dollars) than he did on much less income. What do you contribute?
Posted by: Libs Are Hypocrites | February 2, 2012, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Posted by: Libs Are Hypocrites | February 2, 2012, 11:24 am 11:24 am
According to their tax returns, in 2006 and 2007, the Obamas gave 5.8 percent and 6.1 percent of their income to charity. I guess Michelle Obama has to draw the line someplace with all this ‘giving back’ stuff. The Bidens gave 0.15 percent and 0.31 percent of the income to charity.
Meanwhile, in 1991, 1992 and 1993, George W. Bush had incomes of $179,591, $212,313 and $610,772. His charitable contributions those years were $28,236, $31,914 and $31,292. During his presidency, Bush gave away more than 10 percent of his income each year.
For purposes of comparison, in 2005, Barack Obama made $1.7 million — more than twice President Bush’s 2005 income of $735,180 — but they both gave about the same amount to charity.
That same year, the heartless Halliburton employee Vice President Dick Cheney gave 77 percent of his income to charity. The following year, in 2006, Bush gave more to charity than Obama on an income one-third smaller than Obama’s.
Posted by: Ann | February 2, 2012, 11:30 am 11:30 am