Obama’s Broken Deficit Promise

(Image Credit: Susan Walsh/AP Photo)
“This is big,” wrote White House director of new media Macon Phillips in a February 23, 2009 blog post, ”the President today promised that by the end of his first term, he will cut in half the massive federal deficit we’ve inherited. And we’ll do it in a new way: honestly and candidly.”
Indeed, President Obama did make that promise that day, saying, “today I’m pledging to cut the deficit we inherited in half by the end of my first term in office. This will not be easy. It will require us to make difficult decisions and face challenges we’ve long neglected. But I refuse to leave our children with a debt that they cannot repay — and that means taking responsibility right now, in this administration, for getting our spending under control.”
The 2013 budget the president submitted today does not come close to meeting this promise of being reduced to $650 billion for fiscal year 2013.
The president noted in that 2009 speech the Obama administration inherited a $1.3 trillion deficit.
The deficit was similarly $1.3 trillion in 2011, is projected to be $1.15 trillion in 2012, and the president’s budget claims it will be $901 billion in 2013.
George Stephanopoulos asked White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew about this yesterday:
STEPHANOPOULOS: Now, tomorrow’s budget’s going to make it clear that that promise will not be kept, not even close, really. The deficit will be well over $1 trillion for the fourth year in a row. Why?
LEW: You know, George, as I think you know, when we took office, the economy was falling so fast that the first thing we had to do was put a bottom in. That cost money in the Recovery Act. It cost money in terms of lost revenue and slower economic growth. We’re on track now. We’ve seen several months of sustained economic growth and job creation, but we’re not out of the woods yet. That’s one of the reasons that we still need even this month for Congress to take action and pass the extension of the payroll tax cut. The president’s budget is a plan for 10 years, and over the 10 years, what it would do is bring the deficit down to below 3 percent of the economy, which means that we won’t be adding to the deficit based on current spending. Secondly, it’ll bring the debt as a percentage of the economy down to a point that all international financial organizations look at and say is what you need to do to have stability.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But not even as quickly as you were projecting several months ago.
LEW: Well, look, the economic projections in a time of — of recovery from the deepest recession in a generation are going to fluctuate. Frankly, in the last three months, we’ve had better news than we expected in terms of job growth. That’s a good thing. I think that what we have to do is focus on the long term and the short term at the same time. In the short term, we need to keep the economy growing. In the long term, we need to get the deficit under control in a way that builds the economy that can last for the future, where we build a manufacturing base, we have Americans with the skills to do the work for the future, we have energy so that we can provide for more of our energy needs, and we do it in a way that’s consistent with American values so that everyone pays a fair share.
-Jake Tapper

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Oh good grief, we had a nasty recession and it was a complete game changer. Why can’t we be honest about this?
Posted by: lexingtonlady | February 13, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
His entire presidency has been a sham and a failure.
Posted by: Jack | February 13, 2012, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Read my lips, “I will reduce the budget”.
Doesn’t anyone in this country have a memory. We have been given promises that have not been kept by every President.
If you look at the increase in debt as a percentage of GDP since 1980, you will see that there is no correlation between sharp increases in our debt and which party is in the White House. Promises aside, we need new blood, not recycled ideas. Less blame and more intelligence.
NVM
Posted by: FJL | February 13, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Fair share, i am guessing that does not mean a flat tax across the board… the only real fair tax
Posted by: Big Steve | February 13, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Obama’s the only president in history who never has to keep a single promise. “B-b-but it was worse than he expected!” his lemming horde (and most of the network media) whines. “Bush’s fault…still!” “GOP obstruction!” Obama gets graded on a curve any D student would envy.
Posted by: Bang Out Of Order | February 13, 2012, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Ummm…Lexington, you may want to note that JUNE 2009 was the end of the recession. IN June 2009, Obama hadn’t spent trillions in stimulus which was nothing more than REdistribution of my taxmoney into Obama’s buddies pockets like the Solyndria SCAM and many of his other green scams and road sign scams and hiring of his socialist crooks scams etc etc. Of course we are still hemorraging money———Obama is continuing to redistribute it.
Posted by: saybesay | February 13, 2012, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
As far as promises go, George W. Bush promised to eliminate the deficit and start paying down the national debt.
His accomplishment? Increased deficits and a doubled national debt.
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
we don’t lie ABC, you know that, now get in line with the offical white house talking points
Posted by: Obama truth squad | February 13, 2012, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
$3.8 trillion budget with a $1.4 trillion deficit. Even if you anti-liberty socialists confiscated every penny of the “evil” rich you couldn’t balance this budget.
Posted by: Sean | February 13, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
There are many reasons why this country’s budget deficit will not be cured for years to come. We are still involved in a war in Afghanistan that cannot be won by the US. It is costing trillions of dollars to continue, not to mention the loss of American lives. This country continues to subsidize the oil industry, while it is turning profits of historic levels. The wealthy flat refuse to pay their fair share of taxes, with those “paying capital gains taxes of 15%” not contributing one thin dime towards social security or medicare at unprecedented proportions. Manufacturing jobs will not come back to the US unless Americans make a concerted effort to purchase American made goods, only, which will not happen because we want the cheapest of cheap prices for designer goods, making it impossible for these items to be made domestically. Current jobs being created are not at salary levels at the peak of the last decade, as the residential market collapse wiped out a large portion of high incomes in multiple related industries. All this being said, is this the sole fault of the President? I don’t think so. The public’s opinon of Congress is at an all time low; that’s where the problem with this country’s budget lies. You are plain ignorant if you think this situation is President Obama’s fault.
Posted by: rohnertpark1 | February 13, 2012, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
I am just confused how some of the new spending is “paid for” from war savings. On one hand it was said how fiscally reckless it was to enter into two wars that weren’t paid for, and then on the other savings from “unpaid for” spending is being used to finance new spending? only in washington.
Posted by: Jim Tayberry | February 13, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Oh no! A politician did not fulfill a campaign promise? What on earth is this country coming to, when a politician promises the moon and doesn’t deliver it? It’s really sad, too, that Obama is the very first politician in history to do this. Up until he came along, every other elected official fulfilled every one of their campaign promises. Oh, the humanity………………………………………..
Posted by: A Cynic | February 13, 2012, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Even if you anti-liberty socialists confiscated every penny of the “evil” rich you couldn’t balance this budget.
———————————–
And even if we sold off all the entitlements to private firms and cut the military in half we couldn’t balance the budget either. That’s why it’s going to take a balanced approach with revenue increases coupled with spending cuts. -but even at 10 to 1 cuts to tax increases on only the highest earners, Republicans reject it. Because protecting those tax breaks for their corporate and wealthy masters is really their top priority.
Posted by: face the music | February 13, 2012, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
I knew he wasn’t going to pull this off when it came out of mouth… just like every idiot that has run for office before him, they make promises to get them elected…. sadly, he was “Best” of the two choices in the last election. At this point and time, I still stand by my choice, but I truly hope that someone “BETTER” (and I truly don’t think it would take much) would run, and I don’t care if they Dem or Repub. We CAN do better.
Posted by: tuesdaysgone | February 13, 2012, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
@Jesse… Yea.. and we should NEVER EXPECT better out of the next idiot we send to DC. Oh.. that’s ok if you sold us a bunch of hogwash.. the one before you was no better. Maybe that is why our country is in such shape, we never EXPECT MORE out of our elected officials.
Posted by: tuesdaysgone | February 13, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Sean | February 13, 2012, 2:17 pm post:
Well, mathematically, it could be balanced that way. Meaning, the richest 1% own a lot more than $1.4 trillion in treasure. Hell, we have over 400 billionaires alone in this country. Their collective net worth alone approaches a trillion. So yes, in fact, if the government were to confiscate everything from the top 1%, they could eliminate the deficit and pay something down on the Debt. Obviously this is all pure mental masturbation, since it will never happen. But mathematically, you are incorrect.
Posted by: A Cynic | February 13, 2012, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Oh no! A politician did not fulfill a campaign promise? What on earth is this country coming to, when a politician promises the moon and doesn’t deliver it? It’s really sad, too, that Obama is the very first politician in history to do this. Up until he came along, every other elected official fulfilled every one of their campaign promises. Oh, the humanity………………………………………..
Posted by: A Cynic | February 13, 2012, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
—————
Problem is that this was not a campaign promise – it was in his 2009 budget presented as president. The irony is that President Obama named that 2009 Budget: “A New Era of Fiscal Responsibility.”
Posted by: Jim Tayberry | February 13, 2012, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
This one of the most irresponsible pieces of editorial journalism I have read. For a member of press to ignore the fact that Congressional Republicans obstructionist agenda as the major obstacle to deficit reduction is shameful and unethical.
Posted by: MTATL67 | February 13, 2012, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Posted by: face the music—-Actually the entitlements cost 2.5 trillion, revenues are 2.3 trillion, the rest of government costs 1 trillion or so, cut entitlements and we have a massive surplus, to pay down the debt with, and wages would rise because fewer people would be chasing jobs.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
“Tax relief is central to my plan to encourage economic growth, and we can proceed with tax relief without fear of budget deficits, even if the economy softens,” Bush promised. [Bush Remarks at Western Michigan University, 3/27/01
“And after we fund important priorities in the ongoing operations of our Government, I believe we ought to pay down national debt. And so my budget pays down a record $2 trillion in debt over the next 10 years.” [Bush Remarks to the American College of Cardiology, 3/21/01
The results? Increased deficits. A doubled national debt.
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Hey Lew, this is the worst recovery from a recession in the history of this country. By far. That makes this a historic presidency on the failure scale.
Posted by: foggy | February 13, 2012, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
But what would the deficit be if Republicans hadn’t stymied so many bills that would have decreased it? The right wingers pretend the President has powers that he simply doesn’t have, unless a Republicans is president and then they blame Democrats for blocking him.
The Republicans politicians didn’t want a full economic recovery or a more balanced budget and their votes show that.
Posted by: Librarian53 | February 13, 2012, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Posted by: MTATL67—Last Time I checked we didn’t elect people to agree, we elect people to represent, some things they will agree on and others they won’t, but compromise is not a requirement, only representation of your constituents, fail you constituents and get voted out of office.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Now you’re quoting Bush’s 11 year old speeches? LOL! Bush hasn’t been President for three years, loon.
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Now you’re quoting Bush’s 11 year old speeches? LOL! Bush hasn’t been President for three years, loon.
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Yes, believe it or not Republicans run on their record as well. The last time Republicans had the presidency they left an absolute mess, got us involved in a very unpopular, expensive and deadly war, double the national debt, left an economic collapse, etc . . .. people will judge whether to vote Republican on all of their broken promises and disasters as well.
Posted by: Jess | February 13, 2012, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
We can save a lot of debt by eliminating your welfare assistance. Then you’ll have to stop leeching and will have to find a job and actually pay taxes to help pay for hope and change. That’s change I can really believe in.
Posted by: Bill | February 13, 2012, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Everyone SHOULD stop COMPLANEING!!!!! THE president IS doing THE best he can. Just pay YOUR higher TAXES, nad be QUITET!!!!
Posted by: demnme5 | February 13, 2012, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“But what would the deficit be if Republicans hadn’t stymied so many bills that would have decreased it?”
Posted by: Librarian53
Seriously, do you ever stop spinning and BSing? The Republicans thankfully “stymied” bills for moreand more misguided spending. And the Senate (democratically controlled) rejected Obama’s last budget immediately and out of hand, the same Dem Senate that hasn’t even passed ANY budget in several years now. Please get honest.
Posted by: Jerry | February 13, 2012, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Still nothing has changed: Obama still sucks badly. Prediction: He’ll still be sucking just as badly in November.
Posted by: sai | February 13, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Hope and Change. Translation: We can all only Hope (probably in vain) that we have some small Change left to jingle in our pockets when Obama’s term is mercifully ended.
Posted by: bravenewworld | February 13, 2012, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Let’s just admit that Obama has been a disappointing liar, and then move on.
Posted by: face the music | February 13, 2012, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
To snewsome2997: Yes, let’s go ahead and cut all entitlements, such as those where the average American taxpayer PAID IN, like, say, Medicare and Social Security. Let’s see how popular any politician would be supporting that ridiculous notion. I sure hope YOU are not on Social Security or relying on Medicare; you’d be the first one who should be cut. When all US citizens can act like Mr. Romney and pay taxes at 15% on a $1 million salary disguised as “capital gains” and hide hundreds of millions of dollars in ‘trusts’ and ‘investments’ offshore and pay no taxes on those investments, there might be more sympathy towards your opinion. For all of the blowhards out there complaining about taxes, what you really mean is it is okay for everyone else to pay their fair share, but not you. This country has been running on fumes for decades, and it is now time to pay the piper; including those privileged few, who think they are “entitled” to not pay at all!
Posted by: rohnertpark1 | February 13, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
The last budget under Bush’s control (2007) had a deficit of 161.5 billion dollars. In 2008 all but one of the 13 appropriation bills that made the Federal Budget had been passed by the time Bush left office. When the Obama administration entered office they packed the remaining appropriation bill with additional spending and ran the 2008 deficit total up to 410 billion. At the time the CBO estimated the 2009 deficit would drop to 407 billion. Then under President Obama and a Democrat controlled House and Senate spending truly shot through the roof giving us 3 (and soon a fourth) year of trillion dollar deficits.
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
“Yes, let’s go ahead and cut all entitlements, such as those where the average American taxpayer PAID IN, like, say, Medicare and Social Security. Let’s see how popular any politician would be supporting that ridiculous notion.”
Posted by: rohnertpark1 | February 13, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
“Everybody has got to make some sacrifices, everybody’s gotta take a haircut.” – President Barack Obama (4/5/11)
It’s time to “eat our peas.” – President Barack Obama (7/11/11)
Except for President Obama. He’ll be just fine. You, not so much.
Posted by: Zen | February 13, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Posted by: rohnertpark1—-They receive 3-6 times what they paid in, and that extra money didn’t come from capital gains on T-Bills. If you want a personal retirement account save your money, if you want health care save for and buy it. The main reason for the rising cost of everything is not only are we borrowing and printing mountains of money for entitlements and war, we are giving it to people to compete against those in the market with those that actually earned their money, otherwise known as artificial demand. You are entitled to what you paid in, not what you paid in adjusted for inflation. Maybe if people saw the money that they were dumping into SSI and Medicare was worthless, if people saw that maybe it would institute some changes.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Candidate Obama 2008: “The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents – #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.”. More spending, more deficits – I guess by using his own words, Obama is being irresponsible and unpatriotic. It appears that he owes his predecessor an apology.
Posted by: Holdingontomywallet | February 13, 2012, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Posted by: rohnertpark1—As to Romney’s money it is his, he didn’t do anything illegal. I don’t like him I think he is a RINO, but his money is his business, and no one else is entitled to it. You want money get a skill and earn it, if you aren’t good enough, them’s the breaks. But the productive class of Americans cannot and will not support the entitlement class of Americans. People talk about shared sacrifice, and the rich should pay, and I have to ask what have the poor done, what have they sacrificed, and it always comes back to little or nothing, they have what they have earned and they are not entitled to more.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
about the only thing i’ve learned from the obama presidency is as follows: 1) if bush did it and obama didn’t continue doing it it was evil for bush to do it in the first place and 2) if bush did it and obama continues to do it it is good because obama is doing it (but it wasn’t necessarily good when bush did it because bush was doing it) or something like that.
Posted by: grumpopolis | February 13, 2012, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Social Security and Medicare were supposed to be put into Al Gore’s “lock box”. Obama opened that box and spent everything in it, and more.
If we want people to pay their “fair share” lets make sure everything is on the table including the 40% of Americans that pay no income tax but get refunds from the earned income credit and child tax credit. It is easy to cry “raise taxes” if you know it won’t be your taxes raised.
As for Social Security, 50% of Americans under forty believe in aliens but not in receiving SS by the time they retire. Let cut the (r4p andreplace SS while we still can with private accounts for those who would prefer not to be in the Ponzi Scheme that we call Social Security.
Posted by: ioangoal | February 13, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
We don’t need to raise my taxes to help close deficits…we can just cut government benefits, protections, and services for working class Americans instead. I’m expecting them to eventually see the wisdom in those policies.
Posted by: mitt the ripper | February 13, 2012, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
You have totally ignored the effect of the economic collapse on all the ensuing budgets – minor oversight on your part I’m sure.
Posted by: Dagmar | February 13, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
The economic collapse under Bush was the largest economic collapse since the Great Depression. During the Great Depression, the national deficit rose to over 25% of GDP. During this recession, the deficit peaked about about 10%.
Research your history.
Posted by: Dagmar | February 13, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
You can’t spend your way out of debt.
Posted by: Orion | February 13, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Some people here will defend this president no matter what he does or does not do. Do politicians make promises they can’t keep. Sure they do. But this president said he was going to be different. He said things were going to change. He broke his promise, and he’s not even trying to reduce the spending that might make the goal of reducing the debt possible. He’s just another politician making promises to get elected. What a shame.
Posted by: Jack Smith | February 13, 2012, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Posted by: Dagmar | February 13, 2012, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
There was no “economic collapse.” If there were, the dollar would have collapsed, banks would have closed, interest rates would have skyrocketed, stock trading would have halted, Social Security and welfare payments would have stopped, rioters would have been in the streets, and you’d be hunting for your own food. None of those things happened because trillions of dollars were spent to buy time. What we had was a credit crisis, which is very different. Thanks to Obama, a true economic collapse is on the way, though. Hope you’re ready, Obamabots.
Posted by: Ramgad | February 13, 2012, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Posted by: Ramgad | February 13, 2012, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
It was the largest economic collapse in American history, second only to the Great Depression. You might want to do some research.
Posted by: Dagmar | February 13, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
You can’t spend your way out of debt.
Posted by: Orion | February 13, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Businesses have done it repeatedly. It’s called making an investment in your future.
Posted by: dagmar | February 13, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
I am voting for Romney. As a non-religious person, I like his moderate stance. I trust his integrity and economic ability. He knows how to help encourage business growth and prosperity. I hear attacks on his integrity, with no fact to back it up. He has lived a pretty clean life and I have been watching for many years. He understands the economy and how to fix the mess we are in. I notice that a lot of people who blog would never hire a rich person…it is an automatic disqualification; they prefer an inexperienced person who has never even run a lemonade stand to fix this huge economy. According to the stats, we are now over 15 trillion in dept and borrowing over 10 million a day. Don’t they understand that when the well runs dry there will be no one to bail us out? Greece is just a small microcosm of what is in store for us. I checked the government’s own web site and found that Bush increased spending 3,478 trillion in 8 years. In Obama’s 4 years, spending increased a whopping 5.993 trillion and he did not have to contend with 911 or Katrina. The graph on the page shows it even more blatantly. We are still over 8 percent unemployed and that is probably inaccurate because so many people have quit looking and are not part of the record.
Posted by: Mrs D | February 13, 2012, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Posted by: Dagmar | February 13, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
I shorted the market and made tons of money during your so-called “economic collapse”.
Posted by: Ramgad | February 13, 2012, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Businesses have done it repeatedly. It’s called making an investment in your future.
Posted by: dagmar | February 13, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Solyndra did it. So did Ener1. They both went bankrupt.
Posted by: Ramgad | February 13, 2012, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Posted by: dagmar—Then I want a return on investment, and that means the government pays me a dividend i don’t pay them a tax, instead of the pissing away of money that has been going on, You want to run government like a business fine, use the accounting tricks, and the numbers games, and then actually require a real monetary return on the investments you make, and instead of printing money, borrow it, if the people will let you.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
You can’t spend your way out of debt.
Posted by: Orion | February 13, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Businesses have done it repeatedly. It’s called making an investment in your future.
Posted by: dagmar | February 13, 2012, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
It’s true, many businesses have found themselves in difficult economic straights, borrowed money and invested in their future and survived to great success.
Posted by: Inow Moorethenu | February 13, 2012, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Posted by: dagmar—Then I want a return on investment
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Sorry, instead of collecting taxes or keeping to a balanced budget, President Bush increased the debt so much we’re paying $1.2 trillion a year in interest alone.
You are a few years late and many trillions short.
Posted by: try again | February 13, 2012, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
I wonder what Jake Tapper would make of this? He’d probably be totally non committal so as not to anger the White House and lose his cushy job being their stenographer.
Posted by: Jason Jabber | February 13, 2012, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
It’s true, many businesses have found themselves in difficult economic straights, borrowed money and invested in their future and survived to great success.
Posted by: Inow Moorethenu | February 13, 2012, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
A lot of businesses and a lot of everyday people have gone bankrupt doing the same thing. I know. I’m a bankruptcy attorney. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not complaining. 2011 was a record income year for me. I never did this well during the Bush years.
Posted by: Josh | February 13, 2012, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Dagmar 4:54 PM Since the 1933 Depression the economy has contracted over 10% twice (in the late 40′s and 50′s) Both of the contractions (double dip recession) in the 70′s were more severe than the economic contraction we experienced in 2008-09. Reference – File:GDP growth 1923-2009.jpg I did not ignore the effects of the recession on the economy… I just stated facts. Check your own history.
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
“President Bush increased the debt so much we’re paying $1.2 trillion a year in interest alone.”
Posted by: try again | February 13, 2012, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Lie. Not even close.
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Posted by: try again—-I was being sarcastic I don’t expect the government to run like a business at all. Eventually that interest payment will eclipse tax revenues and it will be game over, and the people who pay income taxes are paying as much as they are willing to pay. Spending more money is just going to make that happen faster. Now by all means lets get it done, we are beyond fixing the problem, the only question now is when not if. All the people who have been promised stuff by the government will be getting nothing. Those who are not dependent on the government will be fine, those who are dependent on the government will not
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
There’s a restauranteur who comes on here named Chuck and his business has been booming since Obama turned the economy around. He’s always boasting about it. And he researches thoroughly and never posts lies, so he must be right.
Posted by: Trent | February 13, 2012, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Both of the contractions (double dip recession) in the 70′s were more severe than the economic contraction we experienced in 2008-09.
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
During the recession from November 1973 to March 1975 recession, the Gross Domestic Product of the United States never fell more than 5 percent. 1973-1975 Recession saw three consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth: 1974 Q3 -3.9% (-3.8%), Q4 -1.6% (-1.6%), 1975 Q1 -4.8%(-4.7%).
The 2008-2009 Recession was the worst recession since the Depression. The economy shrank in five quarters, including four quarters in a row. Two quarters shrank more than 5%, and Q2 2008 shrank a whopping 8.9%, more than any other recession since the Great Depression. The recession ended in Q3 2009, when GDP turned positive, due to President Obama’s economic stimulus spending.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Right. And we’re apparently supposed to completely ignore the fact that when he made that statement the public and private economic data at the time grossly underestimated the depth of the Great Recession and that Republicans also later walked away from a $4 trillion debt reduction deal that was stacked 3 to 1 in their favor.
Posted by: Sam | February 13, 2012, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
The pro-Obama media claims Obama is powerless to change Bush policies such as Iraq/ Afghanistan wars and tax cuts. So, magically, they transfer all of the federal debt accumulated under Obama to Bush. Even the off-budget Afghanistan $33 billion surge is transferred to Bush!! You”ll see this even on whitehouse.gov website. Jon Corzine and accounting experts at MF Global are clearly advising Obama administration.
Posted by: richme | February 13, 2012, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Posted by: ino moorethanu—The difference is what the jobs were, people lost factory and construction jobs and then got them back, now people are losing middle class jobs and getting minimum wage jobs. The labor participation rates tell another story, sure jobs have been added there is no doubt but not 14 million, and not enough to keep up with population growth, so we have been sinking further and further into the hole, maybe not as fast but falling is still falling. There is nothing the government can do at this point they can spend money but they have to take it from someone first and borrow and printing is still taking just at a slower rate. The economy will recover when enough people figure out it is up to them to do something, and until then we will be bouncing across the bottom.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Never mind your reference numbers, just post the percentage decline in the GDP alongside each quarter as I did. It’s simple.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
The pro-Obama media claims Obama is powerless to change Bush policies such as Iraq/ Afghanistan wars and tax cuts
Posted by: richme | February 13, 2012, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
And the economic collapse on Bush’s shift – more impact on the budget and a huge increase in deficits because of that.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Now we have No Guts candidates and the broken promise President and finally the Republicans in Congress–Won’t any one standup and help us on the budget. No one will even try do something about the deficit and National Debt.
We are like the Roadrunner going off the cliff and suddenly there is nothing but air underneath before he falls into oblivion.
Posted by: Jim Mercury | February 13, 2012, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Posted by: Jim Mercury—Roadrunner always makes it, it is the coyote that falls.
Posted by: snewsom2997 | February 13, 2012, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
So you can’t provide a reference for your numbers. Are they made up, are they from the DNC? Surely you must have read them somewhere. If you can quote them so precisely where did you find them.
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
hard to imagine Jake could write this without mentioning the $10 in cuts for $1 in revenue the President offered Republicans. 10 to 1 deficit reduction compromise in their favor and guess what the fiscal conservatives said? Add the necessary context and Tapper’s father in law wouldn’t display it on the refrigerator.
Posted by: ptirebiter | February 13, 2012, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Posted by: ionagoal | February 13, 2012, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
You haven’t produced ANY figures yet! Where do you get off? If you doubt my figures, prove them wrong. Start by posting some figures of your own.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
$5.6 Trillion in debt in just 4 years. Bush had to deal with a recession, 9/11, and 2 wars and with all that he added $4.9 Trillion in debt, but it took him 8 years. Nobody in the entire history of the world had engaged in such massive wasted corrupt spending, and inflicted so much damage and debt on our nation. Nobody!!!! And with all that debt what did Obama get us? Did we come out of the recession faster? NO! Did we get lower UNEMPLOYMENT! Obama promised if we let him spend all that money UNEMPLOYMENT wouldn’t go over 8%, so NO! How did Obama run up that much debt with nothing to show for it? Well the unions love him and will spend billions to help get him reelected so left wing special interests got paid off. And we didn’t much infrastructure, but we did get Solyndra and Ener1. Most of what Obama borrowed and spent on his extreme left wing agenda might as well have been flushed. Obama is the greatest disaster to ever sit in the White House. 4 more years and our nation will never recover!
Posted by: valwayne | February 13, 2012, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
10 to 1 in cuts. What fantasyland were you in when you heard that? The White House says $2.50 in cuts for every $1.50 in new revenues, but they count cuts already agreed too in previous agreements and most of that comes from the military.
Posted by: ioangoal | February 13, 2012, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Posted by: valwayne | February 13, 2012, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Over $1.25 TRILLION of the current debt ‘attributed’ to Obama resulted from interest on the debt George W. Bush left. That’s just the interest on the debt Bush left, never mind the war commitments, the destroyed revenues due to the economic collapse on his watch, the unpaid for seniors drug plan, the huge deficits from his tax cuts, and on and on.
You can’t blame Obama for any of that.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Why is it so difficult to acknowledge the massive problem Obama inherited? Sure, his budget should be more balanced. I was expecting somewhere around $650B in deficits, not $900B. But this is how it is. And, frankly, to get any tax increase passed you need a willing Congress. Why should Obama go out on a limb and propose raising taxes for everyone or most of us if he knows the Congress will not go along? Come on. The GOP is not going to agree to any of this.
We need responsible Democrats in 2013 to run the Congress and the presidency. And they need to arrive with a mandate to balance the freaking budget in four years. It will be painful. But it is necessary.
Posted by: teo | February 13, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
If you know so much about finance and economics why are the people you argue with so much more successful and wealthier than you are?
Posted by: uno nothing | February 13, 2012, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
You can’t blame Obama for any of that.
Posted by: ino moorethanu | February 13, 2012, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Obama was a US Senator before he was President. He voted for lots and lots of deficit spending. He voted for deficit spending has a State Senator too.
Posted by: Trina | February 13, 2012, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Still nothing has changed: Obama still sucks badly. Prediction: He’ll still be sucking just as badly in November.
POSTED BY: SAI
A sad but very true summary.
Posted by: grannynosbest | February 13, 2012, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
May I expand a bit my previous thoughts elsewhere that contained all that is within our current and recently past purview regarding these roundabout and raucously riling issues? Thanks. Let me expand on that a bit: the concentric metrics of Obama spasms in maledictory attempts at reconciling with wacky weirdsters from the left has resulted in the degenerate deconstruction of the maladies of misty mists afflicting his naughty attempts at radical reelection. He made a mistake, it can be ceremoniously cretinized and rectified by November, with luck and more jock-strap like support from sycophants everywhere. Surely and sanctimoniously, craven charts and gluttoneous graphs surreptitious stats can aid in the visual and experiential experiences of pontificatory propaganda on and surrounding our egregious attempts at marauding and marranging the moronical masses who no not knowingly know which dire direction to praise, plead, or stumblingly stumble, or even truculently trot. Heed my advice and info contained solidly and slippery within, or just be a clear dummy or a prancing poltroon.
Posted by: davem | February 13, 2012, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
“Obama was a US Senator before he was President. He voted for lots and lots of deficit spending. He voted for deficit spending has a State Senator too.”
POSTED BY: TRINA
Yes. He was a mostly absentee senator after he was a community organizer (shakedown man). Obama has never, ever it seems had a real job at all, not even when he was far younger. He has always been an academic or governmental parasite.
Posted by: Joesph | February 13, 2012, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
This is great! I stop by after 6 or 7 months and here you all are. Still bashing each other over the head! You all are awesome! Keep it up, I’ll see you all again in 6 months!
Posted by: I WAS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD | February 13, 2012, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Why do two well-educated reporters, one of whom used to work in the White House, go along with the pretense that the President is in control of the budget?
Do we really have to send you a copy of “I’m just a Bill” by Schoolhouse Rock? Has Obama vetoed any spending bills that would have cut the deficit to these levels?
Silly.
Nobody in DC _actually_ cares about the deficit. It’s all just posturing, esp. on the part of Republicans who carefully lose that page of the dictionary when they’re in power.
Do we really have to post the deficit numbers from 2001-2009?
Posted by: Rick | February 14, 2012, 12:48 am 12:48 am
Obama and his minions sure do lie a lot.
Not only did he lie when he “promised” to cut the defict by half by the end of his term, he lied when he said, “[a]nd we’ll do it in a new way: honestly and candidly.”
Absolutely incredible that his minion, Jack “I’m So Much Smarter Than You” Lew, went on Sunday talk shows this past weekend and said over and over that Republicans in the Senate have blocked passage of a budget. Lew must think that the voters out in the hinterlands are stupid or something.
The demwits control the Senate. They have a majority of the votes there. A budget can be passed without having to have 60 votes — just more than 50 — so that the demwits could have passed a budget anytime they want. The demwits have had full control of the Senate throughout Obama’s term as president — and the Senate hasn’t passed a budget in four years!!!
Yet Lew tells his whopper that a budget cannot be passed in the Senate because of so-called Republican “obstructionism” — and he pretends that demwits don’t control the Senate.
And he pretends further that the budget Obama sent to Congress last year was rejected in the Senate by a vote of 97 to nothing!!!! Not a single democrat cast a vote for Obama’s bogus budget.
Really, now, it’s obvious that Lew is trying to sell the lie that the Republicans are blocking a budget in Congress. Come on, now, Lew. Tell the truth for a change. Or keep living Obama’s lie.
Lew should go enter a competition for Biggest Whopper, although he’d lose because his whoppers are so outlandish.
Posted by: JR | February 14, 2012, 5:01 am 5:01 am
If a politician opens their mouth, they are lying. They are all the same, all of them, only some are worse than others. Obama wrote a check his butt can’t cash and he knows it. Do we need to list all his promises that failed to materialize? Just another slick Chicago politician voted in by fools.
Posted by: Indymind | February 14, 2012, 5:23 am 5:23 am
But, but, but, BUSH!
But, but, but, those Republicans in the Senate will not pass a budget!
But, but, but, those ATMs are taking our jobs!
But, but, but, that tsunami in Japan!
But, but, but, I need to bribe my cronies!
But, but, but, I am the ONE!
But, but, but, the economy is improving!
But, but, but, the economy is worse than I was told by Krugman!
But, but, but, we need another stimulus to bribe more cronies and voters!
But, but, but, that is all I have!
Posted by: OBAMA TRUTH SQUAD | February 14, 2012, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Look at the mess GREECE is in. They promised the moon to everyone without working for it and we are just like them only on a much larger scale. You cannot run a country with most of your people not working being supported by those who do! Can the American people be this stupid?
Posted by: rockychance | February 14, 2012, 8:38 am 8:38 am
“Cynic” and all liberals…There is a big difference between debt (currently almost $16 tril) and defecit (proposed ($1.4 tril). Yes, in this budget year, if you confiscated the “wealth” of the rich you could balance the budget THIS YEAR. If you take away the incentives to earn or produce guess what? No more production. You must have all failed Econ 101, laws of supply and demand etc. The govt can intervene in the market all it wants (ie mortgage fiasco), when it does you see the result. Blame Bush? Please…Frankly, I get tired of the arguing and I really don’t know why I bother. We have Greece staring us in the face and yet this county’s entitlement, everybody owes me mentality, has put us on the direct path to that scenario. Simple fact, there are not enough rich people paying taxes on their income (we don’t tax wealth lib idiots) to balance the budget or pay down the debt. You want to start confiscating wealth? Go ahead and good luck.
Posted by: EDOG | February 14, 2012, 8:45 am 8:45 am
We won’t be adding to the deficit is a total crock. Next year’s deficit (2013) will be higher than this year’s deficit. That’s adding to the deficit. Of course, George protected the Administration by shying away from the debt portion of the conversation. Our national debt will skyrocket to about $22T at the end of 10 years. However, they will focus on how this Administration brought down our deficit, regardless if it still tops the $1T mark, but falls short of the $1.3T level Obama has made it for four years in a row,
Posted by: djaymick | February 14, 2012, 9:05 am 9:05 am
ROCKYCHANCE | FEBRUARY 14, 2012, 8:38 AM………Please don’t confront me with truth! And Greece’s entitlements are a smaller % of GDP than the US!
Posted by: deanbob | February 14, 2012, 9:08 am 9:08 am
“Oh good grief, we had a nasty recession and it was a complete game changer. Why can’t we be honest about this?” – lexingtonlady
If it was a complete game changer NoBo would have worked on Jobs and the Economy instead of YesWeCan Care™.
True, Barry got handed a terrible recession but he still went ahead with what he wanted to do.
Torpedos Be Damned.
It feels good to be honest!
Posted by: Noz | February 14, 2012, 9:10 am 9:10 am
“[The economy] definitely shows some signs of revival,” Soros said. “Very important is the revival of shale gas and shale oil as a cheap source of energy which has made manufacturing more competitive [and] also the fact that you now had several years of no wage growth, so wage disparities have been reduced, and so all of this is bringing a very welcome relief.” So, why not make manufacturing even more competitive and create jobs by building the Keystone Pipeline?
Posted by: deanbob | February 14, 2012, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Are any of Obama’s supporters holding him to any of his promises? Or is just because he has a “D” beside his name, he is not held accountable for his failed promises?
Posted by: deanbob | February 14, 2012, 9:19 am 9:19 am
I LOVE how it is the repubs fault because they control 1/3rd of Govt. Look, there are good Dems and good Repubs….. the bad news is, there are BAD ones too. So when a repub and Dem come together to produce a bill The democratic leader in the senate, harry whatever his name is, won’t let any of these bills come to a vote. Because if he does, The argument of obstructionist will be taken away for the 2012 election. The good news is Repubs will take over the senate I pray to GOD that when a Dem and a Repub produce a bill the new leadership will allow it to come up for a vote
Posted by: Greg Harvey | February 14, 2012, 9:27 am 9:27 am
“Are any of Obama’s supporters holding him to any of his promises? Or is just because he has a “D” beside his name, he is not held accountable for his failed promises?”
Sometimes things work that way.
Posted by: John Corzine | February 14, 2012, 10:01 am 10:01 am
If you know so much about finance and economics why are the people you argue with so much more successful and wealthier than you are?
———-
Not what you know, but who you know…
Posted by: George Kaiser | February 14, 2012, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Nice knowin’ ya, Jake.
Posted by: ounceoflogic | February 14, 2012, 10:19 am 10:19 am
What? We’ll have another TRILLION dollar deficit in 2013? Well, let’s end the Bush Tax cuts for the evil rich people, they don’t pay their “fair share”. That will fix the problem!
What? ending the Bush Tax custs for the evil rich people will only reduce the TRILLION dollar 2013 deficit by $70 billion? Well, let’s double the Bush Tax cuts for the evil rich people! That will take care of the 2013 budget deficit!
What? Doubling the Bush Tax cut rate will only lower the 2013 deficit by $140 billion? That’s not even close to what we need to cover things. Well, let’s just take everything the evil rich people have, extract every last dollar they have for the common collective good. That will take care of the deficit!
What, that won’t cover the bill either? Wow, how are we going to pay for all this spending, then?
Hmmmm, what to do…….uh, hmmmmm……
It looks like we only have two choices. Either we borrow more money from the Chinese that our children’s children will have to pay back so we don’t have to make any tough choices, or maybe we should take a close look at HOW MUCH OUR GOVERNMENT IS SPENDING AND WHAT THEY ARE SPENDING IT ON AND CUT IT BACK!!!!!
That’s right America! It’s time to cut back before we become Greece. You can’t blame this on just the Democrats, or just the Republicans. The blame rests with both parties and our over-reaching and over-promising Federal Government. It’s time to get serious about cutting the over-all budget and start paying down the debt. The choices will be hard, but they will be harder and harder each year we wait. It only gets more painful the longer we put off actions.
Wake up America!
Posted by: usagoingbroke | February 14, 2012, 10:24 am 10:24 am
You Obama appologists and supporters have bankrupted your children’s future. The top .01% pay 80% of our nation’s taxes. The bottom 47% pay no taxes. Our debt is $13 Trillion and climbing with every Obama budget. In fact, there has not ever been an approved Obama budget because not a single Democrat Senator votes yes for them.
This means you all are child-abusers. That’s right. Your children will be sending the majority portion of their earnings to the Chinese and the Banks. They will be slaves. They will never own property. They will live as the East Germans before the fall of the Soviet Union.
All Obama is interested in is selling us out to his crony billionaire friends. You are all a bunch of chumps.
The stupidity of the American electorate is mind-boggling. Dead brain, dumb, stupid. It’s a disgusting shame.
Posted by: Stan | February 14, 2012, 10:55 am 10:55 am
I have a lot of respect for Jake Tapper. He tells the truth, rather than try to slant reporting to please ABC’s mostly liberal audience.
Posted by: RedInDenver | February 14, 2012, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Let’s start with the radical assumption that the money you earn belongs to you. The amount paid in taxes represents what you are willingto pay to fund a government that represents you.
this budget does not represent my needs and desires and it obviously does not start with the assumption that the money they use is mine. If we do not get back to this understanding of government there is no limit to how much of our money they will take and spend – all in the name of taking care of us.
Posted by: RButtarazzi | February 14, 2012, 11:19 am 11:19 am
“why not make manufacturing even more competitive and create jobs by building the Keystone Pipeline?”
Why? Because, it is in George Soros’ interest that we expand oil imports from Basil. He owns a large share in Petrobas Brasil. And then Good old Grandfatherly Warren Buffet tried to sell Obama on transporting Canadian oil to our gas refineries with his Railroad, rather than the Keystone Pipeline. Good Old Warren owes $1.2B in back taxes to the US Treasury. But, he and Obama have a deal that if Warren touts the “Buffet” rule of raising taxes in the rich, Obama will sweep Warren’s tax bill under the rug. Of course taxing the rich does not mean raising the capital gains tax which is how Warren only pay 15% on his personal income. He no longer earns income subject to personal income tax like us peons.
Get it people? Obama is selling the United States of America and our children out to his crony billionaire friends!!! Treason, People!! Get it? You dummmys!!!
Of course you too can join the crony freind of Obama club by donating a few $million to his campagne. Spare change for the crony billionaires. Or if you don’t have the money, just donate your children for slave labor by voting for him.
Posted by: AlarmClock | February 14, 2012, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Mr. Tapper should also mention that Mr. Obama’s budget includes $1B in aid to the Egyption revolutionaries. How much money do you want to take out of your children’s pockets to send to Egypt? Let’s see, $1B/200M children = $5,000 per child. Woop-ti-doo!! Sign me up!
Go ahead chumps – vote for Obama 2012.
Posted by: Ralph | February 14, 2012, 11:42 am 11:42 am
There is absolutely no excuse for this. The man has failed the country. He has failed this generation and generations to come. He can make excuses all day long…I know the progressives in my part of the world with being staying home in November. This nasty man thought he could play us. No sir. You will being going back to Chicago on a private plane come November for lying to the American people and selling us out to the banks and Wall Street.
Posted by: Social Justice Crusader | February 14, 2012, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“tax the rich to feed the poor ’til there are no rich no more. Then what? Totalitarianism. BHO must go!
Posted by: Mark | February 14, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Obama is selling the United States of America and our children out to his crony billionaire friends!!!
——————————–
Actually we’re counting on our buddy Mitt to really help us out.
Posted by: billionaire banksters | February 14, 2012, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
The Obama Administration is divorced from reality now. In November, when they lose big and cast about for villains to blame, the divorce will be final.
Posted by: jadams76 | February 14, 2012, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Can all of Obama supporters, who blame the “obstructionist republican congress” , tell me what Obama passed in his first two years in office with a democratic house and senate that lowered the deficit…….oh that’s right there is NOTHING! All Dems can do is whine about Bush, how about accomplishing something, you had your chance and are making it worse. Dems have too many interest groups that they don’t want to offend……
Posted by: Nick | February 14, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Ya’ gotta love Jake Tapper. He works for the left wing media but he calls it like it is.
Smart money says that the ABC Obama hand puppets will fire him for something and he’ll be on FOX.
If gas is at $4.00 at election time, Obama will lose just for that. Nice going O, nixing the Keystone Pipeline just to please the wacked out green lefties.
In fact, Obama is already beat, based on his gross failures and lies so far, like the above. I’m voting for the “not Obama” candidate.
Posted by: isnrblog | February 14, 2012, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
The growing Deficit is a Big deal, it affects ALL Americans., in many different ways.
One thing that is so clear about this president is he’s “a tweaker”, Not a problem solver.
Our deficit is not only a threat to our national security, but its a Huge Burden on our children, who will have to deal with it in the future.
Obama’s made us look like Deadbeat Parents…
Posted by: Paul | February 14, 2012, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
HOPE CHANGE…has become lies and debt on a scale never before seen.
Posted by: Bert | February 14, 2012, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Journalists w/ integrity, I beg you to expose this bald-faced lying fraud Occupying WH for what he is. Do it for the good of your country. Do it for your professional honor and integrity. This man Occupying the highest office of this remarkable land is doing bigger damage, more damage, perhaps irreversible ruinous damage to the core essence and foundation of this country. This article is only the tip of the iceberg. We implore you to expose the rest of his perfidious designs and awaken Americans who have been so systematically divided and turned into partisan mad mobs focused on each other’s destruction instead of vigilance about what this charlatan is doing to their country. Wake your country up; do it before it is too late.
Posted by: Zohreh | February 14, 2012, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Obama is simply following the Alinsky playbook, the Cloward-Piven strategy, etc. He and his fellow travelers want to bankrupt the United States and use class warfare to foment a revolution that will accomplish “the fundamental transformation” of America that he promised he would seek if elected President.
The proof of this is his stonewalling of the Keystone XL pipeline. If he REALLY was sincere about creating jobs and growing our economy, he would have wholeheartedly supported the project, something that the majority of trade unions fully support. His decision makes no rational sense, and is in reality quite insane. Which has led me to believe that this man truly wants to destroy our current Capitalist system and replace it with God knows what. Obama, the incompetent radical must go!!
Posted by: Trojanguy | February 14, 2012, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Obama will go down in the history as the president who ditched responsibility. The guy has no conscience. He’s consistently made promises that he knows are pie-in-the-sky, consistently blames others, and consistently pits Americans against one another. If he weren’t destroying the nation, he would be laughable.
Posted by: judithod | February 14, 2012, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
The ‘O’ lied again?
Next thing you know, they will tell you water is wet…
Posted by: ChuckTX | February 15, 2012, 2:00 am 2:00 am
“The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents –number 43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back — $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.”
Candidate Barack Obama, April, 2008
Posted by: richme | February 15, 2012, 2:56 am 2:56 am
The trolls that keep saying Obama broke every promise he made, stop lying. He pushed through Obamacare, yes he ran on that and he killed Don’t ask don’t tell… and it goes on from there.
Posted by: bayhuntr | April 4, 2012, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm