Feb 1, 2012 7:47pm

Rick Santorum Tells Sick Kid Market Should Set Drug Prices

gty santorum tk 120201 wblog Rick Santorum Tells Sick Kid Market Should Set Drug Prices

(Getty Images)

WOODLAND PARK, Colo. – GOP contender Rick Santorum had a heated exchange with a mother and her sick young son Wednesday, arguing that drug companies were entitled to charge whatever the market demanded for life-saving therapies.

Santorum, himself the father of a child with a rare genetic disorder, compared buying drugs to buying an iPad, and said demand would determine the cost of medical therapies. 

“People have no problem paying $900 for an iPad,” Santorum said, “but paying $900 for a  drug they have a problem with — it keeps you alive. Why? Because you’ve been conditioned to think health care is something you can get without having to pay for it.”

The mother said the boy was on the drug Abilify, used to treat schizophrenia, and that, on paper, its costs would exceed $1 million each year.

Santorum said drugs take years to develop and cost millions of dollars to produce, and manufacturers need to turn a profit or they would stop developing new drugs.

“You have that drug, and maybe you’re alive today because people have a profit motive to make that drug,” Santorum said. “There are many people sick today who, 10 years from now, are going to be alive because of some drug invented in the next 10 years. If we say: ‘You drug companies are greedy and bad, you can’t make a return on your money,’ then we will freeze innovation.”

Santorum told a large Tea Party crowd here that he sympathized with the boy’s case, but he also believed in the marketplace.

“He’s alive today because drug companies provide care,” Santorum said. “And if they didn’t think they could make money providing that drug, that drug wouldn’t be here. I sympathize with these compassionate cases. … I want your son to stay alive on much-needed drugs. Fact is, we need companies to have incentives to make drugs. If they don’t have incentives, they won’t make those drugs. We either believe in markets or we don’t.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

We got it, Rick ,- You are the lucky one to get access to all possible care…
Just to remind You – we all are paying for it, for Your Care – like Single Payer option available for entitled Idiots like You.

Posted by: Linda, Fl | February 1, 2012, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

If the government and health insurance didn’t pay for medicine——-the prices would drop so most people could afford them. (btw, the drug cost on paper isn’t the true cost. Insurance companies and hospitals have contractual agreements to charge insurance far far far far less for the same drug if you paid for yourself would costs several times more. Perhaps these agreements should be outlawed so everyone pays the same thing making health care more affordable for those without insurance.)

Posted by: beensaidsaid | February 1, 2012, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

WHY do the same drugs cost $$$ here in the US of A, yet cost $ in a FOREIGN country???

Posted by: James | February 1, 2012, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I’m grateful Isabella Santorum’s Dad has good health insurance; paid for by the U.S. Taxpayers.

Posted by: Coffeeocity | February 1, 2012, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

And this is why you’re trialing in the polls, Rick. Drug company CEOs are greedy, creating drug shortages to jack up the price. Charging Americans hundreds of dollars for medicines that are reasonably priced in other countries…is all about greed. You are so out of touch!

Posted by: Alice | February 1, 2012, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

This shows how out of touch these politicians are with the average person. It’s easy for Santorum to say what he says about health care because he and his family get free government health care provided for them which by the way is paid for by us, the average person.

Posted by: Ed | February 1, 2012, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I often wonder why Republicans deny scientific evolution when they are the accomplished practitioners of social Darwinism! “The market could do no wrong; the Market is God” should be Republican motto. If they really want the market to work, then they should ban Insurance companies. Let the market decide what the cost is. We will see who can afford healthcare; that should bring costs down by their reasoning since Insurance interferes with direct competition for customers and distorts price!

Posted by: dabu | February 1, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Typical con for Santorum to try to make the argument that the drug companies have to turn a profit to have incentive to make new drugs.
No one is arguing against them making a profit, we are against them making an obscene profit at the expense of ill people who can’t afford it.
But Santorum knows this, he just hopes he can fool a few folks into thinking the drug companies deserve to charge whatever they want to.

Posted by: Librarian53 | February 1, 2012, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

maybe part of the incentive for making and developing drugs should be the fact that these drugs “help people”. im not saying that Big Pharma shouldnt make a profit but to say the ol’ line that drugs take years to develop and loads of research etc etc is nothing more than a line. Big Pharma spends many times what they spend on R&D on advertising and buying drs to hock their latest product. Its good they make profit to continue business but it would be nice if they had some heart in it. The gov’t shouldnt make deals where big Pharma gets to set any price on their drugs when it raises the cost of health care. IF the govt is going to get into a social system of health care then perhaps lobbying should be equal on both the part of Big Pharma AND on behalf of the people. ‘and i agree with James….why do drugs cost $$$ here and $ there?

Posted by: MntRosie | February 1, 2012, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

One of the reasons that drugs cost less in other countries is because those countries set the price for these drugs. The drug companies are OK with that because they can charge ridiculous amounts of money for it in the US to make up for the loss overseas. Of course if the US would stop putting ridiculous restrictions that only protect the drug companies from smaller competitors, you’d see more competition and much better pricing. And if we were allowed to buy drugs from Canada, the companies would probably raise the prices there and face some major outrage. It’s true that they spend a lot on making these drugs and have to cover their costs, but they cover that cost and much more thanks to the fact that insurance allows them to charge these ridiculous amounts. It goes further than just greedy companies. It’s this marriage of corrupt bureaucracy and crony capitalism that both sides are so eager to keep alive

Posted by: commentsarecool | February 1, 2012, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

He forgot to mention that federal $$ pay for much of the research that benefits drug companies, and that the US is the only industrialized nation that pays such astronomical prices for drugs. And that drug companies spend more on direct to consumer advertising (which is banned in most nations) than they do on any actual R&D. Add that to the fact that the price of our health care over all is really decided by insurance companies and big pharma and you have a recipe for disaster, especially if you are one of the working poor.

People like Santorum are what is wrong with this country.

Posted by: KatS | February 1, 2012, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

i’m an MD. my DH is an MD. when we need to buy rx meds (all non-addictive) we go thru online Canadian pharmacies. i’m a big believer in generics but sometimes the meds are not available generically, or the generics are not quite as effective. there are times when we travel to other countries and the same brand-name meds are available at a fraction of the price (and yes, these are reliable pharmacies). this is not to say i recommend or advocate buying meds online or from other countries. this is merely pointing out what other commenters have observed, that these same meds are a fraction of the cost in other countries. santorum *theoretically* has a point about profit and incentive, but he seems as far removed from the reality most people who need healthcare face as someone who’s never had a sick kid. maybe his health insurance is that great. but the drug cos. and insurance cos. pretty much have the system skewed against the poor patient who dares to actually NEED the care for a serious illness. sad.

Posted by: US MD | February 1, 2012, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Once again the republicans prove that they only care about the economics of the rich and pander to the poor with hate, religion, fear, homo-phobia, and lies. They want your vote, they just don’t care about your finances.

Posted by: vissionquest | February 1, 2012, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Our government helps pay R & D with our tax money, and they also get it cheap from colleges. This is the biggest snow job going down in the US right now. It’s bunk. They spend far more on ads and sell the drugs to the rest of the planet for less money. I’d hate to guess how much side effects and bad drugs also cost this country anymore. This is one of the biggest issues we have in healthcare. Shame on Santorum here. Talk about cold. I guess since his daughter’s expensive care is fully covered he could care less about others. There is nothing Christian about his thing here.

Posted by: lexingtonlady | February 1, 2012, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

The US is the only industrialized economy in the world with captialism in the health care system. So every corporation comes to the US to make their profits. So the drug companies have to make their profits here and if some people have to suffer, so be it. The FDA approval process was created by the multi-national corporations to make it nearly impossible for small start-up companies to compete.

Posted by: GreggW | February 1, 2012, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

This clown actually said spending $900on an ipad is pretty much the same as spending $900 on medication???? Did anyone point out to this idiot that 1) ipads don’t cost $900 2) not everyone has money to buy ipads 3)not everyone wants an ipad and 4) those that do buy ipads only need and buy one whereas people who need lifesaving medicine need to buy it on a regular basis. Most people could not afford to spend $900 per month on medicine. I am sick of Rick Santorum and his self-righteous nonsense and hatred dressed up as christianity. I eagerly wait for the day when he is caught in a gay scandal and slinks off into the sunset and we never have to hear from him again.

Posted by: Marlene | February 1, 2012, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

BTW
How Ron Paul WINS
In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way. ~Franklin D. Roosevelt
Time to face the facts. What the GOP fears most is what America needs most.
Neither Santorum nor Gingrich can win the Nomination for one simple reason. Neither of them can collect enough delegates to win the Nomination.

Neither man can be the nominee because neither one was able to get on enough states’ ballots to make a difference. (564 delegates that Newt can’t win ), Same with Santorum (over 700 delegates he can’t win ). And the media as well as the GOP are praying to god that the American people continue to remain ignorant of this fact for as long as possible while they try to come up with a strategy that will bury Ron Paul before Romney is forced to face him on stage alone and the commentators are no longer able to marginalize Paul by giving all the questions to everyone but him.
Ron Paul and Mitt Romney are the only two candidates that made it on the ballot in every state. Romney will not beat Obama, he’s too similar except he will raise taxes on anyone making 40k a year or more. Independents are going to run to Obama if Romney is the alternative.
It is a two man race between Ron Paul and Romney for the nomination.
It is also a two man race between Ron Paul and Obama for the White House.
It’s time Conservatives and people with any functioning brain cells in their heads started backing the only real candidate that will beat Obama and save America. And whether you like it or not, that candidate is, by default, Ron Paul.
The facts can’t be twisted to point in any other direction. The Delegates decide who gets the nomination and you can’t get delegates if you aren’t on the ballots. It doesn’t matter how much money gets pumped into your campaign by special interest groups. The facts are the facts.
IMPORTANT FACTS
Fact : Gingrich and Santorum cannot win the nomination no matter how much they get in ” popular ” votes.
Fact:Romney will fail epically against Obama in a general election.
Fact : Ron Paul will decimate Obama on his Foreign Policy stance alone. Add in his Economic and Defense policies ( All 3 of which were policies Obama ran on in 2008 and abandoned once he got in the White House so no one would be stupid enough to believe he’s going to follow them in his second term ) and you have an un-beatable candidate in the general election who the bulk of the American people will vote for when they finally get a chance to see the man unfiltered and unbiased by the media.

America is broke and the average American is tired of hearing about another war on the horizon and seeing more dead soldiers coming home in coffins for no reason…all the while the freedoms they are dying to ” protect ” are being stripped away from us by our own government…one by one.
Obama has ‘0’ chance of beating Paul and Washington knows it. The GOP knows it. The corporations that own Washington know it too so they instruct the media outlets they own to hide it from you.

But now you know. Gingrich and Santorum are mathematically incapable of winning the Nomination and Romney can’t beat Obama in the general election.
Ron Paul is the only choice we have. It’s just nice that, for once, he’s the RIGHT choice and not just the ” lesser of two evils

Posted by: RioSam | February 1, 2012, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I am fortunate to have my in laws living in the Philippines. So whenever someone we know goes back there, we give them about 20-40 bucks and buy a whole box of whatever we need like antibiotics. Which you need a prescription for in the US, but in the Philippines you dont. Its also a fraction of what it costs here. I agree, some of the medicine is incredibly expensive. Do they need to be marked up that high?

Posted by: Kevin | February 2, 2012, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Oh, Rick. When someone spends $900 for an Ipad, it’s something they’ll have for a few years. However, medication needs to keep being replenished every 30 days. So if your medication costs $900, that’s $900 every month which comes out to be $10,800/year. Which, for most Americans, is almost half their yearly income.

Posted by: Julia | February 2, 2012, 12:01 am 12:01 am

Very simple don’t give this man the time of day, date vote for him and most of all when his time is up in government give him the (your Fired) vote, maybe he can get a real job with NO Health Care, Hey Rick, you are an other out of touch, heartless.

Posted by: Thomas | February 2, 2012, 12:36 am 12:36 am

This report seems a bit skewed from what I recall – the woman talking about the Abilify wasi n the middle, on one side of the center, and the boy that asked about drugs was up front on the opposite side – think the report assumes a bit, as I saw the woman and a man her age leave before the end of the speech. If you are going to sensationalize, be accurate.

Posted by: Susie Ryan | February 2, 2012, 12:48 am 12:48 am

This report seems a bit skewed from what I recall – the woman talking about the Abilify was in the middle, on one side of the center, and the boy that asked about drugs was up front on the opposite side – think the report assumes a bit, as I saw the woman and a man her age leave before the end of the speech. If you are going to sensationalize, at least be accurate.

Posted by: Susie Ryan | February 2, 2012, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Demand doesn’t set prices unless something called consumer sovereignty exists. This is a concept a lot of “free market” folks take for granted, but its in any micro 101 course. The opposite of consumer sovereignty is market power. Guess which condition exists in the pharmaceuticals market? Yeah, market power. Especially since drug companies are 1.) protected by patents and 2.) for sick people demand for drugs is relatively inelastic. Not that Santorum ever had to take a micro economics course. What did he study? Political science? In those courses last I checked the professor told you everything you were “supposed” to know about economics, none of which apply to anybody in the real world except republican politicians.

Posted by: derpo | February 2, 2012, 1:31 am 1:31 am

This is a guy who spends all of his time talking about what a good Christian he is? Do you think that telling a woman with a sick child that it’s her fault she cannot afford to buy medicine for her child is what Jesus would do. I mean, I sure am confused, I am Jewish, but I thought the definition of Christian was to be Christ like and didn’t Jesus say that if you had two coats to give one to the poor. Isn’t Jesus the guy who helped the lepers? Somehow I think Jesus would not spend millions on tv ads and not spend a dime to help a person in need. If this is what real Christianity stands for it sure makes me happy that I am not one.

Posted by: Agatha | February 2, 2012, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Bringing one new drug to market takes about 14 years, at a cost of about $1.3 billion. For every drug that makes it to market, more than 50 other drug research programs fail. After all that, only two of every 10 newly approved drugs will be profitable. Then they usually have only about 11 years before generics are allowed. If the market is not allowed to function in an attempt to limit profits, there will be fewer potentially life saving drugs available. But then you will never really know what you’re missing. The same fate awaits potentially life saving medical devices, after Obamacare in 2013 slaps a new tax on the GROSS receipts of the companies that produce them. Santorum has it right.

Posted by: free_2_choose | February 2, 2012, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Obama should be down on his kneeds thanking God for such a poor crop of GOP candidates. Romney tells the poor to drop dead; Santorium wants us dependent on the drug companies and for them to charge whatever they want; Gingrich has all of the baggage such as former collegues that do not want to work for him, his affairs while married; dropping wives when they get sick. The best one of the bunch is Paul who stands no real chance at the nomination. These guys are so poor in character and judgment and it is unbelievable at Obama’s luck

Posted by: Bob Ramos | February 2, 2012, 4:22 am 4:22 am

And those of us who can’t afford $900 ipods? Its been a while but we lost a house because of the cost of our child’s medications after his diagnosis and his medicine cost $75,000 a year. Yes,that’s right. $75,000 a year. I believe our income at that time was about $20,000 – $25,000. The insurance company upped the cost of the plan until it was as much as we were bringing home. The effect was a crippling of family finances for years, literally decades.

And Obama’s insurance plan wouldn’t have helped either if it had been in effect.

Posted by: whatever | February 2, 2012, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Many countries set the price that can be charged by the companies. That is why the drugs are cheaper there. The companies then charge the US citizens and taxpayers through the roof to make up the lost profits. Santorum seems to believe the fairy tale that the companies will only charge what they need to make a reasonable profit and will not rip people off. I also read that the #1 reason people file personal bankruptcy is the high cost of a catastrophic illness. Not because they bought an iPad.

Posted by: pksk531 | February 2, 2012, 8:50 am 8:50 am

The reason you want to take the drug companies side , Rick Santorium is because you can relate it to your child. but all of you pretentenious Republicans who claim conservativsm for votes,sure would love to cut medical costs down when it relates to doctors, nurses, and hospitals and their income. and paychecks.. Maybe if you keep promoting the drug companies side, they’ll give you some of their profits and aid your campaign so you don’t have to take your arrogant, vain, proud desire to be President OUT of YOUR OWN POCKET. If a drug company cannot make a profit , according to you and therefore would lack desire to make life saving drugs,I would guess you could do the same— IF YOU WANT to be PRESIDENT, YOU OUGHT to TAKE the MONEY OUT of YOUR OWN POCKET, THEREBY GIVING YOUR ARROGANT PREJUDICED ATTITUDE MORE DESIRE and incentive to BECOME PRESIDENT and ENJOY ITS BENEFIT and GLORY. Because that’s all you want1
While I’m typing this, I’m listening to that snickering, laughing at America and American’s , your fellow Catholic turned Mormon prophet , Glenn Beck and his laughing, snickering sidekick laugh at our country and government, as usual.
Maybe Rick, you religious fanatics can bring this country under your Catholic religion and the Jewish money system that controls our country out in the open.
That’s why Ron Paul, who knows and tells what is wrong with this country and wants to do away with thge Federal Reserve is made to be ignored nice , little old man.

Posted by: Eugene | February 2, 2012, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Is he $#@% serious?!?!? A couple of years ago I was prescribed pain killers for back pain and unfortunately I became addicted, the funny thing was I never paid a dime for any of the pills because it was from a car accident. I evently got help and started taking suboxone which is an alternative to methadone for opiod dependence however suboxone is very expensive and almost unaffordable for some. These drug companies are playing god and costing people’s lives and well being for the sake a profit.

Posted by: panda987 | February 2, 2012, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Our medical system is messed up anyway. We don’t preach prevention because if people weren’t sick, they wouldn’t make ANY money. And the stuff they use only helps with symptoms and rarely actually cures the cause…but people generally don’t even think about that. The system isn’t about promoting health – it is about perpetuating sickness. Sickness makes money people. So stay sick or get sick so you can help your local medical facility stay in business!!!

Posted by: GG523 | February 2, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

My tax money pays for Rick Santorum’s family to have the best insurance money can buy for life just because he was a Senator once. Must be nice.

Posted by: cc | February 2, 2012, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

NICE!!!
How very Christian of you Rick!!! Oh, you can afford your medicine, your childrens medicine??
GO BEG FOR IT THEN!! thats your answer? These people are not out there buying $900 ipads, hey but the drug companies do give those ipads away at thier various junkets!!! Thank you for showing us your true nature… selfish and self serving. You are nothing but in the pocket of the extreme rich and corporate america. Don’t know what “good book” you read from, but it’s sure not the bible!

Posted by: Ron | February 2, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

The huge hole in Santorum’s argument is that drug prices are not set by any sort of market. The developer of a drug applies for patent protection, whereby the government intervenes in the market and grants the developer a (temporary) exclusive monopoly on selling the drug. You only get something more approaching a market for drug prices when the drug goes generic, and one typically finds the prices drop dramatically at that stage.

Now, the government grants patent protections for a reason — to increase incentives for innovations — and at the same time the government makes huge public investments in drug development, which then get converted to private profits — so it’s not obvious what’s the best way to deal with this situation. However it’s silly to talk about “the market” in this context.

Posted by: MPS17 | February 2, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Yeahhh..because choosing between an IPad or a Samsung tablet is TOTALLY like
choosing between buying life-saving drug or not buying it… *sigh*

Posted by: Talala | February 2, 2012, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Video games and movies also cost millions of dollars to make, but they don’t cost $900.

Posted by: Laguan | February 2, 2012, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

I hope everyone now realizes why so many of us of who live in PA hated having this loser as our Senator. Our tax dollars just covered what was almost surely 10s of thousands of dollars in care for his daughter. Please don’t get me wrong; I’m glad she got the care she needed. BUT SO SHOULD EVERY AMERICAN.

This outburst proves that Santorum is a hypocrite and a disgrace to my college fraternity, which by the way was relatively gay-friendly even when Santorum was at Penn State.

Posted by: Marc Gravez | February 2, 2012, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Yes, because we all know “Rick Santorum Tells Sick Kid Washington Bureaucrat Should Set Drug Pricers” is so much more humane.

Real impressive Mr. Goldman. Real impressive.

Posted by: Rich Horton | February 2, 2012, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

ABC News, I shake my head when my undergrad journalism major friends make grammatical errors. You are a media god, and you should should have have your your editors at least fix the title of this story.

Posted by: Stephen Taruc | February 2, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Well, it seems that Mr. “Right to Life” feels that it is only a “right” reserved solely for those who can AFFORD it.

Again, the problem with those who insist that healthcare is not a “basic human right” (but rather a “commodity”) is that they tend to treat health in the abstract…. but not it’s “care”.

They “factor” monetary costs.. but never in genuinely human terms.

They claim that “health” (in and of itself) is not a commodity… but to BE healthy “IS”.

Sorry.. but that’s pretzel logic at its most twisted.

True enough that it might very well be a commodity here in the United States at the current moment… but it shouldn’t be… not anywhere.. and certainly not in a nation so rich as America… nor should it be in any enlightened, self-governing society that values life over wealth.

“For-Profit” entities should never be allowed to make life and death decisions based on the “bottom line”.. and that is all that health insurance companies ever base any of their decisions upon, which is precisely why this battle for single payer universal healthcare needs to be fought tooth and claw, and why it will continue to be waged until the dreams of our Founders are finally realized… until ALL of the people enjoy the provisions of our Constitution…. our values and responsibilities to EACH OTHER.

There is no place for health insurance companies to exist in any acculturated society, period. They must be excised from our midst as the cancer that they are… and now.

There truly are such things as “moral imperatives”, and this is the “motherload”.

Not just “life” but “quality life”.

It’s called “civilization”… and unless it’s nurtured, it dies.

Posted by: SandyBerman | February 2, 2012, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Apparently your blog is intended to promote news “as you want it to be” and not “as it occurred”. You may have changed the title, but the story is still incorrect – I was there, and this absolutely did not happen as written. I only attended due to the lack of media reporting on candidates, other than Gingrich and Romney, and now that you make a report, it is false, and sensational, and you have done nothing to correct that. I had much more respect for ABC before I was shown that you have no integrity and no apparent desire to admit or correct your errors.

Posted by: Susie Ryan | February 3, 2012, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Does he really think people with sick children are going out buying iPads come on.Rich pay your child’s hospital bill without insurance then see what it is like.Talking about family then telling people who can’t afford meds to for their child to deal with it.Well guess what Rich if the family can’t afford the meds they die because they don’t have them .Stop being idioit

Posted by: Cheyenne | February 3, 2012, 8:21 am 8:21 am

LET THEM EAT CAKE: CONSERVATIVE Christians have never done anything good for mankind. They have been against so much that has made the USA a better place. To name just a few; Civil Rights, Woman’s Suffrage, Abortion Rights, Evolution, Separation of Church and State, Public Education, Immigration Reform, and Racial Integration.

Posted by: Corey Mondello | February 3, 2012, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Okay, now we know who is finanacing his campaign..Big Pharma… And we know where he stands that health care should be market drivien – profits vs life, profits win! In college when I took economics, the first law of supply and demand is that there will always be those who cannot buy a product or service even though they want it because they have no money in which to buy it. And that as a price goes up, lesser and lesser people are able or willing to purchase. Oh yea, and I don’t know anyone who has a $900 I pad. and if they did, its generally a one time purchase, where drugs are genrally taken over a period time are involve multiple purchases. I know that cancer treametns – a single chemo session can be $5,000 to $15,000 – so if you need 6 or 15 or 24, who can afford that? No one unless they have insurance or lots of money. There are 308 million people in the US today – 52 million have no insurance. And 43 million people are below the poverty line and god only knows how many a theething just above poverty and are one problem from joining the 43 million. Basically we have had market based health care, for most of the population – look where its got us. Those who have and those who don’t with a good luck from Rick Santorum.

Posted by: Martha | February 3, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I know Abilify is a very expensive drug, but there’s absolutely NO WAY that kid (or anyone else) is taking $83,333 worth of it per month. It’s expensive enough, there’s no need to grossly exaggerate.

Posted by: Suzanne | February 3, 2012, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I don’t understand Santorum’s point here.
What good is a social structure that doesn’t support the basic health and welfare of its people?
For somebody pro-life, he’s not making a very convincing show of it.

Posted by: Ana | February 3, 2012, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Ah yes, we have here another fine republican that doesn’t understand history and/or just plain ignores it.

Obviously ol’ Ricky has never heard of Jonas Salk, whose remarkable work completely invalidates the argument that if there were no profit incentive, we wouldn’t have innovation in the development of new meds.

Hip hip hooray for ignorant, narrow-minded conservatives!

Posted by: duder79 | February 3, 2012, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

What an unbelievably callous, selfish, small minded, and petty man.

Posted by: Shelley | February 3, 2012, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Well that’s mighty huge of you, Ricky, with your government subsidized insurance plan, to tell me that I’m making the poor, poor pharmaceutical companies suffer if they can’t charge me hundreds of dollars for a month’s supply of meds (I take Abilify too, for bipolar. That stuff is NOT cheap).

And your analogy sucks. Do people buy an iPad every month? Hardly. Stop saying words, they only make you look like even more of a terrible person than you already are.

Posted by: Robyn | February 3, 2012, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

That’s the dumbest analogy I’ve heard lately. Yes, drug companies do spend millions developing drugs, and yes, they are entitled to make a profit, but you have a choice as to whether or not you buy an iPad. You do not have a choice if you need medicine to save your life. That is the big difference. I spend a few thousand dollars every year for medications even with the insurance most Texas teachers have. I DO NOT have an iPad, even though I want one really badly because I cannot afford one. I drive a very old car because I cannot afford anything better. If I didn’t have to take medication, I would have a few hundred dollars a month to throw around for things like that. Medicine is like food. It’s required. An iPod is not. There needs to be a way that everyone can afford medication if they really need it. I don’t know how to make that happen, but I’m sure someone smarter than me could figure it out.

Posted by: Sidney | February 3, 2012, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

It”s called capitalism people, the government doesn’t need its nose in everything, the cost of drugs go down through competition, competition comes from the free market. Quit buying into the misleading headlines and articles that are deliberately misleading you.

Posted by: brenda ward | February 3, 2012, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Santorum is absolutely correct. All you free loaders wanting something for nothing are despicable. How much money went into developing that drug? Do scientists work for free? Do they earn $8 an hour? I’m glad Santorum said what he said. Sure he is sympathetic to the kids plight, but that doesn’t mean the medicine should be given out for free.

Posted by: Fred | February 4, 2012, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I was at the event in Woodland Park, Colorado. It was NOT a “heated exchange.” Santorum kept his cool, and answered the question honestly and thoroughly. Not every disagreement over an answer someone gives rises to the level of “heated exchange,” so how about we put an end to the sensationalizing and editorializing. Just tell the story.

Posted by: BILL | February 4, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

OK, I was at this event and witnessed this. The woman was passionate, but not heated. Santorum kept his cool and was very respectful and thorough and honest as it relates to his opinion. (In other words, he didn’t try to pander to the kid or change his opinion to look good. This, I respect.)

Santorum’s big point was this: once we start meddling, the whole thing crumbles and then no one gets any medicine because you’ve taken away the incentive for the drug companies to put in the $1 billion it takes to do research, run tests, take the drug to market, etc. This incentive is profit. Profit is not an evil thing.

So while the free market system might put out a medicine with a cost that’s a burden to some consumers, it cost the drug companies a ton to get there, and they don’t work for free! Besides, Santorum listed a few options consumers can come up with to overcome those costs, summarizing it with the main idea that we’re better off coming up with free-market solutions to the cost issue rather than imposing limits and regulations that will stifle the drug production and distribution.

In other words, ****it’s better to have an expensive drug you have to find a way to pay than no drug at all available to save your lfie.*****

I agree.

People, LIFE ISN’T FAIR. It’s not fair this kid is sick. But at least his parents have a drug available to them to help him. A bigger problem for them would be to have a sick son but no way to help him. THAT would be bad.

Posted by: Monica | February 4, 2012, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

It’s not fair, sick people pay more for healthcare than healthy people.

Wait.. That sounds about right.

People realize that without how we pay for healthcare advances, we wouldn’t have new drugs, procedures, best doctors… Etc? Other countries have been mooching off the US for years. Time for them to pony up?

Posted by: Don | February 4, 2012, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Santorum is no longer an elected official. He has private insurance right?

Posted by: Chiat | February 4, 2012, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

This guy is dangerous.

Posted by: Robbi firestone | February 4, 2012, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Santorum pretends as though medicine only progresses when Americans get priced out. He knows that medical innovations can and do happen in publicly funded research and have been handed over to big pharma for the price to get jacked up on the very taxpayers that footed the bill on the R&D.

Posted by: K.R. | February 4, 2012, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

It’s pretty easy to tell who here has never dealt with a major health crisis in their family. They are the same ones who, when they do, will be crying louder than anyone about the unfairness of having insurance and still getting your bank account emptied when someone gets sick.

Posted by: Arthur Frain | February 4, 2012, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

So what, someone else should HAVE to pay for the medical bills of this child because it is morally wrong to let him die? If everyone was forced to pay for everyone else’s bills, we would have absolutely no money for anything else. No, that is not the issue at all; it is a healthy mixture of monopolized rates by insurance companies and big pharm with the help of the federal government. Look I’m sure plenty of people sick or not would love to have the system Canada has in place….but frankly our population is too large and we cannot afford it. You want better healthcare? Find a way to get the doctor-patient relationship back to a much friendlier level. Get the harsh restrictions on what medicine we can and cannot take lifted so alternative options can open up. Get less restriction on these pant ants for drugs, so that competition can be created to lower the costs of the drugs themselves (ending the monopoly for the only kind of drug to treat so and so form of Acid Reflux disease). Finally, get some kind of Tort reform in place, so that the medical malpractice suits don’t keep jacking up insurance premiums, and Doctors won’t have to use as much wasteful testing to avoid lawsuits.

Fact is this is why our world works, and having government take care of the medical business exclusively is a very bad idea. If you do not like what you have now, you can thank your government for its involvement thus far!

Posted by: Eric | February 5, 2012, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Name a price fixing country which ever in history had a vibrant drug industry which ever cured anything.

Posted by: JBurdman7 | February 5, 2012, 1:40 am 1:40 am

“So what, someone else should HAVE to pay for the medical bills of this child because it is morally wrong to let him die?”

Do you pay for insurance?

guess what.

you’re not paying those premiums to pay just for your own protection, but for everyone else who participates in that insurance plan.

shocker, huh.

Posted by: Ichthyic | February 5, 2012, 2:46 am 2:46 am

After reading the posts on this board, I am saddened for the state of the human species. If this “life isn’t fair” “suck it up” “the market will decide” “too bad, so sad” mentality is going to be the dominant perspective of our species moving into the 21st century, I want no part of it. It’s a horrific regression and Satanic in nature. I fear for the future of humans if this is the path we go down.

Posted by: Mistercrispy | February 5, 2012, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Christian fundamentalist ideology does not include empathy, charity or compassion. Self-righteousness certainty allows him to scold this mother in public – oblivious to the hypocrisy that his sick child enjoys health insurance – and that people don’t buy a new iPad every month.

Posted by: JayR727 | February 6, 2012, 12:35 am 12:35 am

The ‘free market competition yields lower prices’ soundbite is shot down because the drugs are patented, generic equivalents prohibited for more than ten years after FDA approval. The ‘Us vs. Them’ fundamentalist ideology is immune to logic. Whether U.S. or Middle East, radical extremists have much in common.

Posted by: JayR727 | February 6, 2012, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Every time the government hands out its freebies and goodies, prices skyrocket. Why are LIBs incapable of grasping that fact? Yes, the biggest reason that medical costs are astronomical is because the US Government ALREADY (Before Obamacare) makes up nearly 50% of the entire health-care market! They pay through the nose and the medical industry is only too happy to oblige with higher and higher prices and more and more claims. The government has TRLLIONs to dole out!

LIBs have been misled, then repeat the lie that costs go down or that medical care becomes more efficient when the government gets involved in “providing” care on a widespread basis. Thank the feel-good policies of providing cradle to grave health-care to anyone who reaches our shores for the ridiculous costs we have today. NO ONE is ever turned down for medical care… a la a “free market”. So we already have socialized health-care, to a large degree. Obama took the next step. And, predictably, costs have gone UP. Yet, the drones still think it’s all Bush’s fault or something. LOL Too funny. Heads suspended in the fog of the unknown.

Posted by: DaveintheD | February 6, 2012, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Having worked at a School of Pharmacy at a major research university for many years, I can tell Mr. Santorum that, more often than not, the basic research that leads to new drug discovery is generally done at universities and, thus, directly supported by all of our tax dollars. Major pharmaceutical companies these days are spending vastly more of their resources on advertising and lobbying than on R&D. They know that we, the taxpayer, will bear that burden for them, and then, once a drug shows promise, they swoop in and finish the process, reaping millions if the drug works out they way it looks like it will. Wasn’t always so, but that’s how the game is played these days. I am continually disgusted (but no longer surprised) when GOP representatives sing the praises of the “free-market” while simultaneously siphoning public funds for the private enrichment of their friends and donors (see also Federal Reserve discount window; for-profit colleges underwritten by government-backed loans; logging and drilling leases on public lands, etc., etc).

Posted by: gumbo | February 7, 2012, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

He professes to be a Christian, yet I have not seen him show any type of Christian values. He is against contraception and abortion, even in the case of r-pe, he believes that the women should just make the best of a bad situation. So if a woman has say ten kids because she can’t get contraception under this man’s tyranny, if one or more of her kids gets sick and she can’t afford the medication she should just watch the child get sicker and die because she’s making the best out of a bad situation? Maybe Mr. Santorum should have his cushy job and tax payer subsidized insurance taken away and see how long it is before he is bemoaning the highly insane cost of medication. That is in fact set by the Pharmaceutical companies as they become richer, pay lobbyists millions of dollars to get laws passed that give them the right to pillage and plunder this country, and post record profits while paying their executives hundreds of millions of dollars to continue their plundering of the American middle class.

Posted by: Laura | February 7, 2012, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Santorum may call himself a Christian, but he has not learned much from Jesus.

Posted by: Larry Linn | February 8, 2012, 6:53 am 6:53 am

Drug companies spend 2 times as much on advertising as they do on reserach and development, make it illegal to advertise the latest and greatest drugs that we cannot live without. Also, if the price is set by the market, then make it legal to buy drugs from Canada, Mexico and India, they offer the same drugs at a fraction of the cost of what we sell it for.

Posted by: Mark | February 8, 2012, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Medicine should not be developed with the goal in mind for profit! this is why there are a zillion D!CK medications out there and few if any for many real diseases. They will develop that in which there is MONEY to be made, so forget it if you have a rare disease! You are toast!

Posted by: elizabeth | February 8, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Santorum is such a prig. WE pay for the astronomical costs for little Bella – IF she were a child of the ghetto – unemployed (cobra unaffordable) – or one of Nancy Pelosi’s numerous non union, min wage employees (vineyards and restaurants) she would be DEAD. How dare he go off on some rampage about 900 for an Ipad / when it had ZERO to do with this woman’s plight. I bet he has one being a lobbyist (oops consultant) for MINING, Health, Big Pharma. I DO NOT have an IPAD and would never buy one RICKIE because slave labor in China makes them while APPLE makes billions in profits. Hey Rick how about you ripping off Pa. taxpayers to the tune of $100,000 for your home school children (cyber school) when you live on a 2 mill estate in Virginia.

Posted by: jude | February 8, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Rick Santorum can go right on believing in markets and corporations and whatnot. I’ll believe in PEOPLE, supporting and helping individuals, because all those big, wonderful things Rick Santorum believes in are made of PEOPLE.

Posted by: Marianne | February 9, 2012, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

I am deeply shocked and saddened by Mr. Santorum’s positoin on pre-existing health care issues. I expected that with his daughter, Bella, he would support others with PEC. Perhaps he and is family are the recipients of the Federal employee health care benefits,

As for my family, I have a daughter with Type 1 diabetes, an auto-immune disease with no know cause or cure. While “Obama care” prevents insurance companies from denying her coverage, it does not limit how much they can charge.

Due to the ecomony, my husband was laid off after 37 years of steady employment (no pension). Our California Cobra payments are $2,100 a month. To put our family on the state plan for pre-existing conditions, the premiums would be $3,800 a month. Clearly we can’t afford it. We are about to go uninsured (like 52% of Americans between the ages of 19 and 64), and in 6 months sign up for PCIP, the Obama care funded health plan for people with pre-existing conditions. This goes against everything I believe in, but what else are we to do?

Mr. Santorum better get in touch with Americans and the lack of health insurance coverage, or he will lose the election to the very issue he states he is running on.

We are hard working, tax paying, conservative Americans. We can’t find work, and can’t afford health coverage. We are looking at a choice between paying our mortgage, and buying health insurance.

Posted by: Susan | February 13, 2012, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

After taking a month break, in a few days I need to back to work. I’ve had a little travel with my family in the past month, and the truth is, I never thought i could be so happy.

We travelled to Asia, spent 1 week in Japan, 2 weeks in China and few days in Korea and Thailand.

First thing I need to tell you guys is, remember that, original Chinese food is much delicious than those who served in China Town. They are much much more delicious! I ate numerous food in that week, so awesome!

As to Japan, well, the most special thing in my opinion it’s their video games, such a large amount of video game stores out there and you could see people play games on their mobile phones, psp and Nintendo game box. Besides, I visited 2 cosplay competitions in Tokyo, and I must say it is really an eye opener for me. BTW, who said Japanese girls are super easy to bang? Totally bush*t!

Korea, I like it, but I’ve to say their foods are not very good for my family, either too spicy or little, and SO EXPENSIVE!!!

We traveled to Thailand last week, well, it’s a mysterious country I’ve to say, so many amazing things I’ve never heard, and their spas, I never know there are so many kinds of different spas on the planet, if you go their, don’t miss them.

OK, this is my vocation, I just want to share it with you guys before I back to work, and hope someone would share his/her vocation with us. Good luck!

Posted by: rosnwu | February 16, 2012, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Good bye, genial friend :)

Posted by: acaphyauthery | April 27, 2012, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Obedient bye, genial alternative other :)

Posted by: Fliemssom | May 9, 2012, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.