Romney Calls Morning After Pills ‘Abortive,’ Says ‘Right to Worship God’ Is Necessity

(Gerald Herbert/AP Photo)
CENTENNIAL, Colo. — Employing some of his most conservative rhetoric to date, Mitt Romney referred to morning after pills as “abortive pills” during a speech at a rally in Colorado where he told the crowd about the importance of electing a president who will protect the “right to worship God.”
“I’m just distressed as I watch our president try and infringe upon our rights, the First Amendment of the Constitution provides the right to worship in the way of our own choice,” Romney said to nearly 3,000 people gathered in the gymnasium of Arapahoe High School, in Arapahoe County, an area known as a so-called “swing county” that Obama won in 2008.
“This same administration said that the churches and the institutions they run, such as schools and let’s say adoption agencies, hospitals, that they have to provide for their employees free of charge, contraceptives, morning after pills, in other words abortive pills, and the like at no cost,” Romney said. “Think what that does to people in faiths that do not share those views. This is a violation of conscience.
“We must have a president who is willing to protect America’s first right, our right to worship God according to the dictates of our own conscience,” he said.
Romney was referring to the plan by the Obama administration to require any church-affiliated employers to include coverage for birth control that was pushed forward in January and is set to go into effect in August. The issue was brought up again when leaders in Catholic churches across America read letters from the church’s leadership on Sunday, Jan. 29, condemning the administration’s policy.
Until now, Romney has not spoken about the mandate at any of his campaign events, but he did in an op-ed he wrote in the Washington Times in which he condemned the policy.
“And on day one I will eliminate the Obama administration rule that compels religious institutions to violate the tenets of their own faith,” he wrote. “Such rules don’t belong in the America that I believe in.”
While a Romney aide said the former Massachusetts governor was simply addressing the issues of the day during the rally, the candidate’s overtly conservative language seemed to suggest a continuing desire to appeal to the conservative base of voters, a contingent he played well with in Nevada’s caucuses last weekend. Romney’s remarks also come after a day in which his campaign sought to challenge former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum’s status as a conservative in press conference calls and opposition research e-mails.
Romney also renewed his attacks on the administration’s attempt to determine who qualifies as a “minister,” a reference to the controversial case involving Michigan schoolteacher Cheryl Perich that resulted in the Supreme Court applying the “ministerial exception,” a ruling the administration had opposed. Romney first critiqued the administration’s opposition to the Perich case at a meeting of evangelical voters at a Faith and Freedom Coalition event in Myrtle Beach, S.C., in January.
Perich was fired by a school run by the Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church. Perich, who suffered from narcolepsy, was told she would be fired if she did not submit to an agreement that would give her some money for her health care in return for her resignation.
Perich, however, turned to the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which filed suit on her behalf, arguing that her firing was in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act. But when the case went to the Supreme Court, the justices ruled unanimously against Perich, Chief Justice John Roberts writing in the court’s opinion that the First Amendment bars “the government from interfering with the decision of a religious group to fire one of its ministers.” The Supreme Court ruled that, “the church must be free to choose those who will guide it on its way.”
“Did you understand that this administration argued before the Supreme Court that a church should not be able to determine who their ministers are but that government should decide who qualifies,” Romney said of the Perich case, as members of the audience booed audibly.
“And by the way, you know that some of the members of the court are pretty liberal. You know what they decided? They decided 9-0 President Obama was wrong,” Romney said.

Email
Joe Biden Speaks at the West Point Commencement
Obama's Memorial Day Remembrance
The Morning After Pill is like a regular birth control pill on steroids. I wish to heck men would back out of our business.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | February 6, 2012, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
fertilization doesn’t occur for several days after intercourse. implantation occurs later than that. the morning-after pill can’t possibly be “abortive,” because neither fertilization nor implantation have taken place, you’re completely wrong, Romney, and you’re playing on people’s fears and religious myths to say otherwise.
Posted by: bajacalla | February 7, 2012, 12:37 am 12:37 am
Romney smells the possibility of being the nominee, he is rattling like a desert snake. His dream of being president will be dashed in November 2012
Posted by: NoFlyZone2 | February 7, 2012, 12:39 am 12:39 am
Wonder if Romney has ever been pregnant. If the admin is infringing on religious freedom why is having polygamous marriage against the law? It’s a belief of some religions, isn’t it. Such hypocrites.
Posted by: Peter Knight | February 7, 2012, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Ah geeeez, the guy just cannot get his facts straight, can he? First he says he’d support a constitutional amendment stating that life begins at conception and when asked if that would make some forms of birth control illegal he answers “Life begins at conception; birth control prevents conception”. Aaargh. It’s obvious someone tried to explain to him that the pill doesn’t prevent conception and he STILL got it wrong.
Posted by: puppyfeet217 | February 7, 2012, 1:23 am 1:23 am
“Romney Calls Morning After Pills ‘Abortive,’…”—–Only if one can prove that conception had begun.
Posted by: john locke | February 7, 2012, 1:59 am 1:59 am
“…Says ‘Right to Worship God’ Is Necessity” —–As is the right not to worship God. Freedom is an individual’s right to choose his own path.
Posted by: john locke | February 7, 2012, 2:02 am 2:02 am
This guy has GOT to go……
Posted by: Sherri | February 7, 2012, 2:14 am 2:14 am
Of Course it is Abortive.
The Woman consciously make the choice to take a pill to destroy the possible fertilzed egg which was a result of her own choice to have sex without contraception. She knowingly, makes the decision to kill any possible fertilized egg.
The only reason to take a Morning after pill is to destroy the life of the fertilized egg.
Posted by: ron | February 7, 2012, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Mitt Romney tells great lies… he and others like him have destroyed the Grand Old Party. The facts have been ignored in this case… and oh btw… Article 6 Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution states “all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
Clearly this bozo doesn’t understand that and therefore is unqualified to hold this office…. EVER!!!
Posted by: T | February 7, 2012, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Sperm can reside in the fallopian tubes for 3 or more days awaiting ovulation. The so-called morning after pill functions in most cases by preventing ovulation and by eliminating the hospitable environment for the waiting sperm. Instant fertilization after intercourse as claimed by the religious zealots is impossible and fertilization in the first few hour is rare.
Basing law on religious dogma violates the establishment clause. Preachers or politicians who try to hide that dogma behind medical fabrications only attract the ignorant.
Posted by: Robert Cruder | February 7, 2012, 2:31 am 2:31 am
OMG, Romney is a religious fruitcup social conservative but a spend happy lib——the worst of both worlds. The only good thing I can say for him, is atleast he isn’t the moron crook Obama. Anybody but Obama includes Romney I guess so I will be forced to vote for Romney. Oh the pain.
Posted by: besaidbe | February 7, 2012, 3:11 am 3:11 am
Why is it when Republicans talk about “freedom” they are only talking about corporate freedoms to cut wages and benefits of employees, rip off American consumers and pollute the environment and NEVER talk about individual freedoms for the American people? Ohh, that’s right, “corporations are people too my friend”. NOT! Mitt Romney, stay out of my PERSONAL family business!!!
Posted by: dan | February 7, 2012, 3:25 am 3:25 am
romney has to get off this religion kick now. he is going to lose the votes of moderates, centrists of all political parties and those of the independents. figure it’s the females choice starting right from the get go. whatever the female decides is between herself and her god or whatever her religious beliefs. everyone else butt out.
Posted by: david | February 7, 2012, 4:17 am 4:17 am
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The establishment clause was, is and always will be intended to keep the government out of our religious freedoms. Obama wants to enact law that walks all over the first amendment by forcing religious organizations to support something (contraceptives and abortion pills) that are in direct conflict with their beliefs. You may not agree with a particular religion’s beliefs but for God’s sake you need to recognize and support the first amendments right for each religion to have their beliefs and not have them interfered with by the government.
Posted by: Mike | February 7, 2012, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Again, you *ss, stay out of my bedroom, otherwise I am coming for your tax havens.
Posted by: oldwolf49 | February 7, 2012, 5:19 am 5:19 am
So, Mitt Romney believes that a woman doesn’t have THE RIGHT to choose whether she wants to use contraceptives or not…… LOL! ….. Yep, that’s a Republican for you, Ladies. YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS!
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | February 7, 2012, 5:59 am 5:59 am
Romney is shameless in his exploitation of the religious war against women for political gain. “… We must have a president who is willing to respect America’s first right, our right to worship God,” God is watching and She is PO’d at the mockery being made of religion. A church can’t use the gov’t to further “its religion”, i.e. no contraception, no abortion. You are free to worship your god, you just can’t exploit the gov’t to force your beliefs on others. That is freedom from religious oppression. No berkas for American women!
Posted by: Silver Wolf | February 7, 2012, 7:14 am 7:14 am
A woman voting for a Republican, like Romney, for President is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders for “best chef”.
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | February 7, 2012, 7:15 am 7:15 am
Jumping on a trampoline – abortive? Does that mean we ban pregnant women from jumping on trampolines?
Posted by: Myke | February 7, 2012, 8:27 am 8:27 am
How about Romney not take the pill and leave everybody else alone?
Posted by: Carrie | February 7, 2012, 8:28 am 8:28 am
I’ve lost count; how many holes does he have in his foot, now?
Posted by: Aaron Ververs | February 7, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Every day Mitt moves farther into the area of “1984 style extremism with more government regulation of private life choices. “Big Brother is watching you!”
Posted by: IBTD | February 7, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am
THIS is the best you can do, Republicans? This ignorant, factually challenged misogynist? I realize he is stumping for the nomination and pandering to an insanely ignorant and backward constituency. But come on!!! Isn’t there ONE intelligent, forward thinking, rational Republican politician left in the entire country?!?!? Why is it that Republican politicians only vigorously defend the “rights” of Corporate-Americans, while simultaneously fighting tooth and nail to squash the rights of Human-Americans? And why the HELL do you Republican rank-and-file supporters ALLOW THEM TO DO THIS?!?!?
Posted by: A Cynic | February 7, 2012, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Ok, here’s my take on things:
Obama is requiring religious based companies with employees on their payroll to offer a FULL RANGE of health care options which include birth control methods. To me, this is done on a business level and religious beliefs should be left out of business decisions. If you don’t agree with birth control methods, then you don’t have to worry about it, but if you do, then you should be assured that your employer is offering coverage for your PERSONAL decisions.
Secondly, if these religious companies choose to not have birth control methods offered to their employees as part of their medical benefits, then they can always head to Planned Parenthood where they can get the birth control methods they desire at a very reasonable rate with no questions asked.
Posted by: Manda | February 7, 2012, 9:18 am 9:18 am
The Republicans have declared war on women.
Posted by: Ga.Voter | February 7, 2012, 9:20 am 9:20 am
I find it difficult (impossible) to believe that Romney would be so energetically battling the violations of rights of non-Christians or atheists. Does he support the rights of muslim women to pass through airport security while veiled? Does he support the elimination of the word ‘God’ from public institutions, such as schools or city government offices? What an opportunistic hypocrite.
Posted by: Giraffe-o | February 7, 2012, 9:22 am 9:22 am
These guys do NOT get it. the law says the birth control must be offered as part of the health care coverage. not all people who work in these hospitals and the like are Catholic and even then, the Catholics take birth control! NO ONE is forcing women to take the pill, they are just being given the same options that others have in other businesses. In a business sense, this is a very GOOD thing because they may attract more and better prospective employees. If the Hospitals and other Catholic organizations affected by this ruling do not like it, give back all of the Federal Money – including Medicare and Medicaid – and declare yourselves fully privately funded. AND I AM A CATHOLIC
Posted by: pksk531 | February 7, 2012, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Mittens needs to back off of womens’ rights. He is an uninformed ass.
Posted by: Joel P Lynn | February 7, 2012, 9:41 am 9:41 am
The republican position on abortion is nothing but religion. Then they would force that religion on the rest of us, and that is unacceptable.
Obama has to go…….but we have to stop the republicans on the religious issues.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 7, 2012, 10:01 am 10:01 am
“So, Mitt Romney believes that a woman doesn’t have THE RIGHT to choose whether she wants to use contraceptives or not…” Do a little more research before cackling. The jury’s still out on whether ECPs are purely contraceptive or also contragestive, in which latter case Romney is justified in his claim.
Posted by: MyTake | February 7, 2012, 10:13 am 10:13 am
@Ron “Of Course it is Abortive. The Woman consciously make the choice to take a pill to destroy the possible fertilzed egg which was a result of her own choice to have sex without contraception.”
You need an education, Ron. One of the major ways emergency contraception works is by preventing the ovaries from ever releasing any egg to begin with, so no egg is available to be fertilized by any sperm present from sexual activity. (Sperm can fertilize an egg for up to 3 day after intercourse). By preventing an egg from being released from the ovary, the EC prevents fertilization, so the most common mechanism of action of EC doesn’t even involve a fertilized egg that women are “attempting to destroy.”
Posted by: Minorkey1 | February 7, 2012, 10:39 am 10:39 am
This same administration said that the churches and the institutions they run, such as schools and let’s say adoption agencies, hospitals, that they have to provide for their employees free of charge, contraceptives, morning after pills, in other words abortive pills, and the like at no cost,—-well, if you run a business it must comply with the law. period. You want to run a church, fine. If you want to run a hospital, a restaurant, an air line, whatever you want to run, as a BUSINESS and be clear, hospitals are a BUSINESS and your employees are NOT members of your church, you need to provide for those employees under the law of any business hiring people. Period. Dont like that???? then ask for volunteers. If you are hiring people, you must comply by the law. Period. We are a nation of LAWS!!! Says Thomas Paine 200 years again and so it still is today, no matter what the religious wack jobs want, this is NOT a theocracy! It is a nation of LAWS.
Posted by: Johnny boy | February 7, 2012, 10:49 am 10:49 am
The republican position on abortion is nothing but religion. ——- absolutely true! And my religious beliefs say I cannot force my religion on others. In fact, I’m Christian and that is what Christ said. “those of you without sin cast the first stone”. In other words, go home, worry about your own sins. hey! That girl over there is going to have an abortion. uh huh. NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!!!! That is between her and her God. Period.
Posted by: Johnny boy | February 7, 2012, 10:50 am 10:50 am
I used to like Romney…..>> this really makes me second guess him. THis is…. misogynist.
Posted by: Granny Nos Best | February 7, 2012, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Note to Mr. Romney:
Abortive: “to stop something before it has begun or to cause something to fail before it is complete.” (Cambridge Dictionary)
Is Mr. Romney also planning on outlawing condoms and all other forms of birth control, because they ALL fit the definition of abortive? They all stop conceptions and subsequent pregnancies before they begin. Even the infamous Rhythm Method and Early Withdrawal are ‘abortive’ techniques.
What an idiot.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | February 7, 2012, 10:58 am 10:58 am
For spit’s sake, I wish Romney would get his facts straight. The “morning after pill” prevents pregnancy by preventing implantation. A woman isn’t pregnant until those cells are implanted inher uterus. He is pandering to people whose votes he wants, telling them what they want to hear. I for one have grown tired of a pack of men who feel that it’s ok to involve themselves in my privte life and dictate what I can and cannot do regarding my body. Stay out of women’s business and concern yourselves with more pressing issues like how to get our country back on track economically.
Posted by: msyellarose | February 7, 2012, 10:59 am 10:59 am
If a church wants to operate a business, then it’s a business, not a church. I say put everyone on equal footing – treat churches like the businesses they really are. Doesn’t stop people from believing or worshiping as they like, but when it comes to business, they have to toe the line like everyone else. What was that about giving to Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and giving to God that which is God’s? Didn’t Jesus kick all the businesses out of the Temple? To me that implies that houses of worship shouldn’t be running businesses. And how many churches, particularly mega-churches, have coffee shops and gift shops in their houses of worship?
Posted by: Minnesota Mama | February 7, 2012, 11:04 am 11:04 am
…well, if you run a business it must comply with the law. period. You want to run a church, fine. If you want to run a hospital, a restaurant, an air line, whatever you want to run, as a BUSINESS and be clear, hospitals are a BUSINESS and your employees are NOT members of your church, you need to provide for those employees under the law of any business hiring people. Posted by: Johnny boy | February 7, 2012, 10:49 am.
Unfortunately, that is no longer true, as of last month. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that religious organizations do not have to abide by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and can fire someone based on their disability. Shocking, yes, but it is now the law of the land.
Posted by: A Cynic | February 7, 2012, 11:22 am 11:22 am
What?! Oh brother…..
Posted by: Thoughtyouknew | February 7, 2012, 11:33 am 11:33 am
wait…..wait…..reading this blows me away. The Catholic church is requesting NOTHING except don’t force this down the churches mouth. If you wish to have these services, go ahead and request them. No skin off of my butt, just don’t force them onto people who’s fundemental faith states it is not correct. Catholics don’t support this so don’t force it upon us.
If the Dept of Health stated that pork is a really important food source and all children should eat it at school, do you think Jews would be upset? Their fiath states it is a food they should not eat. The government should not make that call. I know it is a completely different subject but the same end game.
Posted by: jfire976 | February 7, 2012, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Republican Platform
Anger African Americans / check
Anger Hispanics / check
Anger Asians / check
Anger Women / check
Anger Gays and Lesbians / check
Anger Union Members / check
Mission Accomplished! Good luck Republicans…..
Posted by: Jim | February 7, 2012, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Jim, you left out poor people and unemployed people.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | February 7, 2012, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“The Morning After Pill is like a regular birth control pill on steroids.”
Sorry – not quite right – it IS a regular birth control pill on steroids. IT’s nothing but an ultra strong dose of birth control medication. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posted by: FormerMarineSgt | February 7, 2012, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
“If the Dept of Health stated that pork is a really important food source and all children should eat it at school, do you think Jews would be upset?” ~~~~~~~ False analogy. This is like saying that the school should be required to serve pork as a food option. It is still up to individuals whether they eat it or don’t. Nobody is going to force a Catholic to use contraception or an ECP. The law is about whether the hospitals and other businesses must OFFER it as a benefit to their employees. Any employee who disagrees with it for religious reasons will not be held down and force-fed contraceptives.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | February 7, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Oh my, someone actually wrote on here that fertilization doesnt occur for several days. You obviously know nothing about conceiving. An egg can be fertilized within a few hours, and the morning after pill stops the egg from implanting, hence killing off a fertilized egg (should it have been fertilized). You take the Morning after Pill to stop a pregnancy, so its like abortion and I think Romney is right to call it that.
Posted by: Louisa | February 7, 2012, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
NOTE: The Republican candidates have ALL signed the Personhood pledge. This pledge wants to ban abortion completely. It is so vague that it could also be used to ban all contraceptives! Santorum is completely against contraception. From reading this Romney may be as well.
Posted by: pksk531 | February 7, 2012, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
I still can’t grasp what the “Right to Worship God” has to do with contraceptives. People are so caught up in their religious dogma that they can no longer think with a rational mind.
Posted by: Taintedbylies | February 7, 2012, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
When they (religious organizations) start paying taxes, then we’ll listen to them. Until then, they should have no say in the matter. If they insist and continue their political activities, then they violate their tax exempt status. The church must stay out of politics. If the church wants to operate a business then the church must abide by the same rules as everyone else.
Bottom line, organized religion is organized crime. There is nothing being forced down anybody’s throat that is a threat. What is being called for is a business to offer the same benefits as other businesses.
Posted by: raggmopp | February 7, 2012, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Nice interpertation of an organization black mailing an employee with heath insurance. Why is Romney spending time defending religious freedom, when the recent experience in this country has been that religions spend their time taking the rights of people away. The government says you must treat all people equally, and religion says all people are not create equall. It breaks down to this–I do not care what your god tells you to do, just have a problem with your god telling you what I should do.
Posted by: VISSIONQUEST | February 7, 2012, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I still can’t grasp what the “Right to Worship God” has to do with contraceptives. People are so caught up in their religious dogma that they can no longer think with a rational mind. Posted by: Taintedbylies | February 7, 2012, 12:14 pm.
I was looking for what Jesus said against abortion, but came up empty. Although there is an interesting passage in the bible that can be construed as supporting abortion. Betcha not one single “Christian” can name it – or wants to………
Posted by: A Cynic | February 7, 2012, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
There are countries in the world whose government is totally based on religion, in the Middle East, especially Iran and Saudi Arabia. Women have no rights, and anyone opposed is killed. Terrorism is a religious duty.
Is that what the republicans want for this country? Why do they have such are hard time seeing the consequences of a government based solely on religious beliefs. Hasn’t the world taught them anything?
Thank God the founders were wiser.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
I have read this a few times now. The only answer to Tainted by lies is NOTHING. This is a typical Republican scare tactic. Same as the “Death Panels” of 2010, the Obama is a Foreigner lies of 2008, and the lies told by Bush/Cheney in 2004. You know, the ones that said if we elected a Democrat the terrorists were just gonna come over here in droves and kill us all.
Posted by: pksk531 | February 7, 2012, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Romney can’t pass a biology class.
Even if Romney is against contraception, he needs to realize that contraception is legal. If this is a guy that is going to pick and choose which laws he wants to ignore, that is a serious problem.
Posted by: mollydtt | February 7, 2012, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Wow! ABC has really got the mental illness that is extreme liberalism whipped into a frenzy! LOL
Posted by: whynot | February 7, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Romney will win the GOP nomination by appealing to the right wing of the GOP. However, by doing so, he will lose the general election by a wide margain. Why? take this article as an example. By saying what he has in public, he has offended more women than he did before. No only has he lost the black vote, the latino vote but now also a big chunk of the women vote.
Posted by: Bob Ramos | February 7, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I’m not about to buy your Mormon faith Romney. Keep your God, and I’ll keep mine. Don’t cross the line on forcing people to worship. That is people’s choice. Not Government’s choice.
Posted by: Cary | February 7, 2012, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Taintedbylies | February 7, 2012, 12:14 pm:
“I still can’t grasp what the “Right to Worship God” has to do with contraceptives.”
======================
Well, it is in the bible if you look hard enough, I think in one of the Catholic church’s extra (add-on) commandments… “Thou shall not wear condoms!”
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | February 7, 2012, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Taintedbylies | February 7, 2012, 12:14 pm:
“People are so caught up in their religious dogma that they can no longer think with a rational mind.”
===================================
LOL! …. yep, I think it’s because they’re all wearing large condomns over their brains, which is blocking any type of logic and education to enter. Lots of folks on the right at least. Now those are the contraceptives that should definitely be banned!
(hehehehehe!)
Posted by: Forrest Gump is DEFINITELY a Republican | February 7, 2012, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
The Catholics and all the other right wing whackos have a right to live their life according to their own beliefs. They do not have a right to interfere in the rights of other people to do the same. The right to worship God has ZERO to do with contraceptive use. They need to get their noses out o everyone’s bedroom and just mind their own business.
Posted by: Ellen | February 7, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Romney is taking a big risk calling attention to religion when a very large part of the GOP base does not accept the Church of Latter Day Saints as a legitimate church or if they accept that it is a church, they do not accept that it is a Christian church.
Posted by: Greggw | February 7, 2012, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Romney spends too much time bashing Obama on any topic that he can remotely connect to the man. He has some good ideas but he has chosen to run on the “let’s make Obama a one-term president” platform, which tickles the fancy of some of his hateful Republican followers, but it lessens his credibility with those of us who actually think for ourselves and want to know how he is going to make America a better place to live for all Americans. So far, all I’m hearing is negative attacks on Obama. That makes him no different from Gingrich, who’s entire platform has become bashing Romney. Is it because the Republicans don’t have a platform, aside from keeping the Bush tax cuts in place? I guess we’ll be seeing Obama for another four years, if this keeps up. Once again, the Repubs fall short. They just can’t seem to get it together!
Posted by: carole | February 7, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Us menfolk always know what’s best for you uppity women. We’ll let know you exactly what you can and can’t do with your bodies.
Posted by: spurs_rule77 | February 7, 2012, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
If we don’t have abortion/plannned parenthood?, we WILL have extinction.
Grab a brain cell.
Posted by: alex C. Smith | February 7, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
The conservative right just can’t see. The best Christian (by the way he lives his life) in the room is President Obama.
Mitt has brought religion into this political fight to win a few Catholic votes, which troubles his own house, now he’ll inherit the wind. Catholics are allowed to have a free will and we’ll “vote” based on what is best for America and “pray” for what is best for the Vatican.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
If we don’t have abortion/plannned parenthood?, we WILL have extinction.
Grab a brain cell. Posted by: alex C. Smith | February 7, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm *********************** That’s rather extreme. Without abortion and planned parenthood we would have an ecological catastrophy that would cause a drastic and rapid crash in the human population, but it would not cause exstinction.
Posted by: Greggw | February 7, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Republicans are pro-life, as long as life never needs food, shelter or an education where it might cost them money…they love money way more than children and God. That’s not to say they don’t use God to garner votes from ignorant masses. Jesus, the real one was a good guy and would not be pro business to where people are exploited and the earth dad created, destroyed so some company can make a few bucks.
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 7, 2012, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
It is the rules of The Catholic Church.
It has been that way from the beginning.
Why doesn’t Obama stay out of it. He doesn’t belong in this society.
Posted by: serena | February 7, 2012, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
He will say whatever his speech writers and handlers want him to say in order to get elected
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 7, 2012, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
\Before you know it we will all become part of his cult. Sorry, anyone who believes what mormons do is pretty dumb.
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 7, 2012, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
It is the rules of The Catholic Church. It has been that way from the beginning. Why doesn’t Obama stay out of it. He doesn’t belong in this society. Posted by: serena | February 7, 2012, 2:47 pm………………………………That’s the point! The church does not get to make the rules!
Posted by: Taintedbylies | February 7, 2012, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
This is to anyone out there that wants to answer this hypothetical question. If your 18 year HS old HS senior son had a 15 year old girlfriend and one thing led to another (not forgetting that there are two willing participants involved) and the girlfriend found herself pregnant would you make your son get out and get a job to support HIS child or would you say, it’s her fault, she should have just said no so I’m not going to make my precious son do anything. Are you going to help raise this child or are you just going to hope the problem goes away? My guess is that you really believe that your darling perfect (do nothing wrong) son shouldn’t be obligated to help raise this child.
Posted by: howdymo1 | February 7, 2012, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
SERENA
The Catholic Church is not based on rules; it’s based on faith and adherence to the teachings of Christ. That’s why a true Catholic would never say someone doesn’t belong in this society.
You won’t find Christ at a political rally. He’d probably be found at one of the OWS rallies preaching against greed and the exploitation of the poor. Let’s face it Christ was a socialist who believed in average people instead of the rights of the money changers.
If someone doesn’t believe in contraception then don’t use it. Anyone has the option of checking a little box and on an insurance form and their not covered for contraceptive devices. What’s the big deal?
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Shame on Romney for either pandering to the ultra-conservative crowd or actually not knowing enough science to understand that the morning after pill is not ‘abortive’.
Posted by: Librarian53 | February 7, 2012, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
You are so right. Only socialists can make the rules.
They are above God, or think they are God on earth.
They are The Church, and they make the rules;
Posted by: Serena | February 7, 2012, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Mitt Romney will say or do anything to get votes or money. If President Obama was opposed to abortion, you can bet the farm that Mitt would be on the other side. He has absolutely no character.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Religious hospitals should have to offer medical help available in other hospitals. Would we want a hospital run under sharia laws to be able to pick and choose which medical procedures and drugs they would give out? Nope, we would all say, this is the U.S. and the rule of law has top billing, not individual religious rules.
Posted by: Librarian53 | February 7, 2012, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Dear Mitt,
Two things:
1. Abortion is legal; and
2. Ever hear of separtion of church and state?
Stay out of my bedroom and I will stay out of your church and tax havens. Oh, and by the way, I am a practicing Catholic. Just because I don’t agree with the manager doesn’t mean I stop shopping at the store.
Posted by: cynda p. | February 7, 2012, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
The Catholic Church could solve this problem by refusing to employ any women of child bearing age or refusing to employ any women who do not comply with all the Catholic doctrine. Then no one they employ would use the services they object to in the health insurance. Of course, that requires discriminitory hiring practices, which are illegal.
Posted by: Greggw | February 7, 2012, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
As a Catholic, I look to the Vatican for guidance but the Vatican realizes humans have a free will and ultimately the decisions I make are between me and God.
I don’t know much about Mormons, I know the majority are good people but Catholics are allowed to have a free will and we’ll “vote” based on what is best for America and “pray” for what is best for the Vatican.
Mitt Romney will not get the Catholic vote because even we Catholics can see a sounding brass when one is in front of us.
Posted by: tmferretti | February 7, 2012, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
yo mitt– plan b is just progesterone. it will not abort a fertilization. you mean RU 482. different pill.
Posted by: auntiem313 | February 7, 2012, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Yo, Louisa, pop quiz for you:
If you have intercourse on Monday, but you don’t ovulate until Wednesday, on what day after the arrival of sperm in your reproductive tract will your egg be fertilized? [Hint: The answer is not within a few hours of intercourse.] Sperm can remain viable for up to 5 days. Ova may be released any time in that 5-day period and still be fertilized. Ova only remain viable for about a day. If sperm enter on Day 1 but ovulation doesn’t occur until Day 3, fertilization will occur on Day 3 or 4.
Now, if you were to take an emergency contraceptive before then, it will stop you from ovulating during the 5-day window when sperm might be present and viable. No ovum release = no fertilization. No conception. Get it? It really is that easy.
Posted by: Minorkey1 | February 7, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Once again we get outright lies from the Republican candidates in their attempt to force their religious dogma upon a secular country.
Fertilization and implantation do not occur immediately after sex. There is literally no difference in function between regular birth control pills and the morning after pill. Calling the morning after pill abortion is more than just stupidity, it’s a lie. This sort of blatant dishonesty should not be unexpected coming from these people. Many WOULD attempt to take away all forms of birth control, but that is not going to happen — there will be blood in the streets before the American people allow the Christian Taliban to bring women’s rights back to the dark ages.
This is ignoring that even if the morning after pill was “abortive”, it’s STILL none of the government’s business as religious law has no place in a secular country.
Posted by: Slash | February 7, 2012, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
This may be a part of his election strategy. To pit religion against the government and specifically President Obama.
Posted by: d | February 7, 2012, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm