WH Chief of Staff Errs on Senate Budget Rules
As President Obama prepares to unveil his FY2013 budget Monday, White House chief of staff Jack Lew this morning was asked by CNN to defend the Senate’s refusal to pass a budget in more than 1,000 days.
“You can’t pass a budget in the Senate of the United States without 60 votes and you can’t get 60 votes without bipartisan support,” Lew said. “So unless… unless Republicans are willing to work with Democrats in the Senate, [Majority Leader] Harry Reid is not going to be able to get a budget passed.”
That’s not accurate. Budgets only require 51 Senate votes for passage, as Lew — former director of the Office of Management and Budget — surely must know.
White House officials did not dispute that Lew misspoke. When asked about the discrepancy, a White House official said “the chief of staff was clearly referencing the general gridlock in Congress that makes accomplishing even the most basic tasks nearly impossible given the Senate Republicans’ insistence on blocking an up or down vote on nearly every issue.”
The issue highlights the difficulty the White House is having running against an obstructionist Congress when half of that Congress is controlled by Democrats, who obstruct things for their own reasons. In this case, political observers believe Reid is reluctant to have Democrats vote on a large budget full of deficits and tax increases that Republicans can use to run against them.
– Jake Tapper

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
“The issue highlights the difficulty the White House is having running against an obstructionist Congress when half of that Congress is controlled by Democrats, who obstruct things for their own reasons. In this case, political observers believe Reid is reluctant to have Democrats vote on a large budget full of deficits and tax increases that Republicans can use to run against them.” Finally, a leftist media talking head putting the truth out there on why the Democrat-controlled Senate won’t do their job. Reid is the biggest, ankle-grabbing coward to wield power at this level (except for the president, of course).
Posted by: s | February 12, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
A do nothing Democrat Senate.
Posted by: CajunW | February 12, 2012, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Right, yet Harry continues to get a pass.
Posted by: Todd | February 12, 2012, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
The Senate Democrats are in a tough position ; they have the votes to pass a budget but that enormous budget request is itself nearly wholly dictated by 8 years of GOP wild eyed warmongering borrowing at massive levels and is exactly the kind of sophist rhetoric ammunition that FOX and Drudge ittes cannot get enough of . Bush starts a raging bonfire with the US economy as tinder and then the conservatives try as hard as they can in every disingenuous way imaginable to blame Obama and the Democrats for having to ask the US taxpayer for expensive water ( i.e. a gigantic budget request ) to put out the fire THEY started out initially . I don’t blame the Democrats at all for waiting until after the election either . The conservatives in US politics cannot be trusted to be honest or play by the rules in any respect so I completely agree with what the Senate Dems are doing now , e.g. just postpone the actual vote and use separate appropriations bills in the meantime to make the conservatives look like the true obstructionists , which indeed they are .
Posted by: davem | February 12, 2012, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
How do you bring it to a vote without a filibuster-proof majority?
If you’re going to write an article on he was wrong, you need to clarify how, what it would take to bring it to a vote, what is actually preventing it.
Otherwise it’s just taking talking point dictation.
Posted by: curmudgeonly troll | February 12, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
curmudgeonly troll | February 12, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm wrote
“How do you bring it to a vote without a filibuster-proof majority?
If you’re going to write an article on he was wrong, you need to clarify how, what it would take to bring it to a vote, what is actually preventing it. ”
There can be NO filibuster on the budget. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-344) automatically limits Senate debate on budget bills to 50 hours. After that time has expired, only 51 votes are needed to pass a budget. The Dems control 53 votes. The only thing preventing Senate Dems from passing a budget for the last 1019 days was the Dems themselves.
Posted by: Saltwater | February 12, 2012, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
The conservatives in US politics cannot be trusted to be honest or play by the rules:
I believe it takes two to tango. Not bringing up a budget for vote for fear that you will be defeated is simply a cowardly act on behalf of Harry Ried. And sitting asiude the fact that thye didn’t pass one when they had all the numbers it proves that they are simply playing by the rules set by the executive branch which seems to be ; ‘make them up as you go’.
Posted by: david | February 12, 2012, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
How far from the truth can this be the Dems have decided to forgo a budget vote just as they did in the last budget vote … we don’t need no stinkin budget”! Obama 2012 budget vote was 97 to zip how’s that for bipartisanship? Since you only need 51 votes … how many dems are in the Senate again? Last I looked there are 54 of them!
Posted by: Cindy Wright | February 12, 2012, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
curmudgeonly troll wrote:”How do you bring it to a vote without a filibuster-proof majority? ”
.
How do you filibuster that which does not exist? Reid and the DEMOCRATS are totally scared of putting their radical spending priorities on paper. They can’t do it since people will see them for the out of control politicians that they are.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I’m not sure you can trust anybody in politics. It’s a matter of who can you trust the most.
Posted by: Dave | February 12, 2012, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
From The Hill: “May 25, 2011 – The Senate voted unanimously to reject a $3. 8 trillion budget plan that President Obama sent to Capitol Hill in January.”
What gridlock? What is Lew talking about? Obama has no interest in working with Congress (Senate or House) to pass a budget. Never has, never will. He is a demagogue. He would rather create the appearance of gridlock and blame everyone else for his lack of leadership. This is self-evident.
Posted by: Woody | February 12, 2012, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
What the WH refuses to admit is that Sen Reid won’t bring up anything for a vote lately…
Posted by: Gregg | February 12, 2012, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
They have no intentions of creating a balanced budget. Even with the tax hikes on the rich they plan to spend $2 trillion dollars more.. Our economy is under attack from the thieves in the WH..
Posted by: George | February 12, 2012, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Just more baloney from the nations divider in chief..envy.. class warfare..scandals… trampling on the constitution..the beat goes on
OBAMA____VS___AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | February 12, 2012, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“the general gridlock in Congress . . . makes accomplishing even the most basic tasks nearly impossible given the Senate Republicans’ insistence on blocking an up or down vote on nearly every issue.”
True.
Posted by: Jamie | February 12, 2012, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
I used to support President Barack Husseim Obama, I really did, but with all due respect, really, Barack Hussein is a opportunistic liar.
“You can’t pass a budget in the Senate of the United States without 60 votes and you can’t get 60 votes without bipartisan support,” Lew said.
When asked about the discrepancy, a White House official said “the chief of staff was clearly referencing the general gridlock in Congress that makes accomplishing even the most basic tasks nearly impossible given the Senate Republicans’ insistence on blocking an up or down vote on nearly every issue.”
What? What the Chief of Staff was “clearly referencing” was “pass a BUDGET in the Senate,” because what he said was, and I quote, exactly, “pass a BUDGET in the Senate”! I don’t mind the mistakes; I don’t even mind the disagreements, but a bold-faced opportunistic lying ideological partisan plug like that is dishonest, dishonorable, disingenuous and utterly reprehensible. Just come out and say it, Barack Hussein: my budget won’t pass the United States Senate because the only thing bipartisan about it is bipartisan opposition. It is time we had a President who isn’t a disingenuous liar. It is time for Romney ’12, PUMA!
Posted by: Obamacrat for Romney | February 12, 2012, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Thank goodness we have this obstructioness house, because I would hate to see how bad the country would be if he got everything he wanted. Blaming the Republicans is laughable and the people are beginning to see through it.
Posted by: Rafe | February 12, 2012, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Posted by: Rafe | February 12, 2012, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Over 3.7 million jobs have been added since Obama’s policies hit full stride. Oil production in the country is up. Green energy production in the country is up. GM is back at the #1 car company in the world! Third shifts are being added at automotive plants. Bin Laden is dead. Kaddafhi is gone. Many, many al Qaeda leaders are gone. All of the world including Russia and China are onside against Iranian nuclear development. Nuclear inspectors are back in Iran. The stock market has gone up hugely since Obama’s policies began to kick in. This is a top of the line administration.
Had Bush or any Republican accomplished all of this in 3 years, the right wingers would be creaming their jeans and calling him one of the greatest presidents of all time. Trouble is – it isn’t Bush – it’s Obama – and right wingers are biased hypocrites.
Cheers.
Posted by: Dan | February 12, 2012, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Jake, have you not noticed that it takes 60 votes for this senate to decide what time they should go to lunch, in other words 60 votes to do anything. It’s that filibuster thing.
Posted by: jim s | February 12, 2012, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Dang! Obama even has members of his staff lying! It never stops with these guys!
Posted by: newcountryman | February 12, 2012, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
This is all becoming rather unbelieveable. It gets worse by the day.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 12, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“In this case, political observers believe Reid is reluctant to have Democrats vote on a large budget full of deficits and tax increases that Republicans can use to run against them.” I TOLD YOU!
Posted by: newcountryman | February 12, 2012, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
It’s the same variation by you everyday – Obama is evil, Obama is the devil, Obama is an alien, Obama is . … etc, etc. etc.
One good way to counter the onslaught of insults and juvenile name calling from the right is with facts. Get used to it.
Posted by: Charlene | February 12, 2012, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
This is all becoming rather unbelieveable. It gets worse by the day.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 12, 2012, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Like did you just wake up from a long stupor?
Do you not recall how people in the Bush White House were charged with criminal acitivities while there? Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush were caught ‘stretching the truth’ repeatedly.
Do you not recall how Reagan ran an illegal shadow government carrying out illegal international activities out of sight of the Congress and out of sight of the people that elected them.
Criminal charges brought and convictions attained against both White Houses.
You need to get some perspective. We don’t want Republicans in there again.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Don’t let facts get in the way of following the party line to blame the Republicans for everything!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | February 12, 2012, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
charlene wrote:”It’s the same variation by you everyday – Obama is evil, Obama is the devil, Obama is an alien, Obama is . … etc, etc. etc.”
.
Your words, not mine…. but now that you mention it…. well… I can’t disagree with you on this.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
The Democrat controlled Senate has done nothing but obstruct all the job and economic bills passed by the House! The liberal democrats led by Obama have failed the American people!
Posted by: BIG JIMMY | February 12, 2012, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Did you just wake up from a long stupor?
Do you not recall how people in the Bush White House were charged with criminal activities while there? Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush were caught ‘stretching the truth’ repeatedly.
Do you not recall how Reagan ran an illegal shadow government carrying out illegal international activities out of sight of the Congress and out of sight of the people that elected them.
Criminal charges brought and convictions attained against both White Houses.
You need to get some perspective.
I’m not sure you can trust anybody in politics. It’s a matter of who can be trusted most.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
jane wrote:”Criminal charges brought and convictions attained against both White Houses.”
.
Do the names Henry Cisneros, Mike Espy, Webb Hubbell, Bruce Babbit, etc. ring a bell? Does the smartest Secretary of State ever, Hillary Clinton, have trouble remembering who she was talking to yesterday? She did more than 250 time when under oath during depositions during the Clinton era. It was widely known as Arkansas Alzheimer’s. The list actually goes on and on.
.
“You need to get some perspective.”
.
You need to get Axelrod or Jarrett to update your cut-and-paste talking points.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
A motion to proceed requires 60 votes as well as many other procedural motions that can be introduced by any dissenting senator. Last year a deal was struck in the senate to pass a budget resolution. Sen Demint demanded that the entire bill, this required 60 votes to block. Reid had to pull the bill
Posted by: Tee | February 12, 2012, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Yes, I can see Henry Cisneros has list of awards and accomplishments longer than your arm and no criminal convictions of any kind.
And I can see that Mike Espy wasn’t convicted of anything at all either.
Do I need to go on or should I just presume the rest of your name dropping is as bogus as those two.
People in both the Bush and Reagan White Houses were charged and convicted of criminal activities.
You need to get some perspective – and facts.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Thank God for President Obama…
bless his family, bless his hard work for this country.
Keep up the good work…and thanks for removing
Osama Bin Laden from this earth
Posted by: Les | February 12, 2012, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
They can lie as much as they like as long as obama’s sycophants in the MSM don’t call them on it. Here we go, not vetting again.
Posted by: clayusmcret | February 12, 2012, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Cheers.
Posted by: Dan | February 12, 2012, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Americans don’t use that phrase. Brits and Canadians do.
Posted by: Carl | February 12, 2012, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
jane wrote:”Yes, I can see Henry Cisneros has list of awards and accomplishments longer than your arm and no criminal convictions of any kind. And I can see that Mike Espy wasn’t convicted of anything at all either.”
.
Your criteria was people charged with criminal activities or ‘stretching the truth’. If that is the case there aren’t enough hours in the day to list the names in the Clinton regime that fit that category including perjury-pony Bill himself. Since you are such an expert on ner-do-well folks, maybe you can explain why current members of oBama’s DOJ are already pleading the 5th on Fast and Furious. Usually means they have some criminal culpability… right?…. I mean thats the way it works when its a Republican.
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Dan, please tell us were the oil production is up, not here in the US. The EPA makes it impossible to get new permits or drill, just because Pres.Obama says so, don’t make it so.
Charlene,Les, and the rest of you Pres.Obama minions,A lie is a lie, Sen. Reid refuses to bring anything to the floor, he already said, he will NOT bring Pres.Obamas budget proposal to the floor, he does not need a budget.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 12, 2012, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Americans don’t use that phrase. Brits and Canadians do.
Posted by: Carl | February 12, 2012, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Carl it sounds like you don’t get out much. Some people actually travel the world and learn things. Viaje con dios partner. Buenos suerte.
Posted by: Jed | February 12, 2012, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Posted by: Michelle Shu Jas | February 12, 2012, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Again Michelle you show the limitations of your perspective.
People in both the Bush and Reagan White Houses were charged and convicted of criminal activities.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Dan, please tell us were the oil production is up, not here in the US.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 12, 2012, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Lizzie learn to do research, seriously and your posts wouldn’t be so foolish.
Oil production in the United States went down EVERY year under Bush, and has gone up under Obama.
Posted by: Dan | February 12, 2012, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Jake Tapper……..Shouldn’t you be spending your time investigating why Republicans are taking their orders from a child molesting organization(Catholic Church)…John Kennedy is probably rolling over in his grave. He had to give a speech promising not to take orders from the Catholic church. Now we have a bunch of right wing republicans and some misguided democrats trying to push Church doctrine across the entire country.
Posted by: Chris | February 12, 2012, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
People in both the Bush and Reagan White Houses were charged and convicted of criminal activities.
Posted by: Jane | February 12, 2012, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
All people who refuse to work but instead spend their days coming up with new ways to steal from taxpayers should be charged and convicted of criminal activities.
Posted by: Bill | February 12, 2012, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
All people who refuse to work but instead spend their days coming up with new ways to steal from taxpayers should be charged and convicted of criminal activities
========================================
Now hold on there! Everything we do is usually perfectly legal!
Posted by: billionare banksters | February 12, 2012, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Tapper, you’re being intentionally obtuse here, pretending Senate Republicans haven’t been filibustering everything Obama sends their way. Do you want people to think you’re dumb or do you think your readers are?
Posted by: nitpicker | February 12, 2012, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
How hypocritical of the Democrats to not take responsibility for being in control of both houses of Congress from 2006-2010, and trying to lay this blame on the Republicans. The shellacking of 2010 occurred for a reason and the Liberals haven’t learned their lesson.
Posted by: Poppa | February 13, 2012, 12:08 am 12:08 am
trying to lay this blame on the Republicans.
Posted by: Poppa | February 13, 2012, 12:08 am 12:08 am
1) Bush homeownership plan aims at $5.5 million lift for minorities (2003)
President Bush announced an Administration effort to increase home ownership rates among African Americans and Hispanics by 5.5 million by 2010.
The plan would provide down payment assistance to 40,000 minority homebuyers each year . . .
Bush’s plan would be closely tied to some $440 million in minority loan programs offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President Bush commended Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s efforts.
2) 2004: Under President Bush, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announces that it will require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also known as the Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) “to increase their purchase of mortgages for low- and moderate-income families and underserved communities.” In order to meet these new requirements, the GSEs begin purchasing mortgage-backed securities made up of subprime loans.
The housing collapse was all the Democrats fault apparently – majority Republican congress and Republican presidency.
Posted by: Danny | February 13, 2012, 1:54 am 1:54 am
Guess Jake Tapper never heard of the passage of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 that was passed on November 18, 2011 or the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 as well as the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2012, both of which were passed on December 23, 2011 which approbated the FY 2012 budget.
Funny how the media fools buy into the fraudulent GOP talking point that no budget was passed for 1,000 days when the facts are that it was passed within those three bills (now law).
Posted by: Mitchell Gore | February 13, 2012, 4:03 am 4:03 am
Incompetence and failures is what this president is all about. They simply do not want to be held to na budget thus is why we havent had one since he was a president. This way the corrupt president and his friends can steal our money more easily by providing loans to his buddies at Solyndra or those phony monies for roads improvements that are actually spent by the states to bail out their unions. No accountability is what Obama is about just listen to him speak its I I I until it doesnt work out then its THEM THEM THEM to blame his failures away.
Posted by: Lew | February 13, 2012, 7:09 am 7:09 am
He wasn’t confused…he just lied knowing that 90+% of the viewers would buy it.
As for the “continuing resolutions”….this is just a way to avoid real cuts in dollars or pet programs and to obtain automatic increases that could not be achieved with a budget.
Posted by: canuck | February 13, 2012, 7:25 am 7:25 am
So an obama hack goes on TV and straight up lies and what we get from the comments section liberals is blather about anything but the subject of the story.
Typical – liberals are a burden on normal people.
Posted by: Rick H. | February 13, 2012, 7:52 am 7:52 am
Guess Jake Tapper never heard of the passage of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 that was passed on November 18, 2011 or the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 as well as the Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2012, both of which were passed on December 23, 2011 which approbated the FY 2012 budget.
Funny how the media fools buy into the fraudulent GOP talking point that no budget was passed for 1,000 days when the facts are that it was passed within those three bills (now law).
Posted by: Mitchell Gore | February 13, 2012, 4:03 am 4:03 am
The same continuing appropriations were used extensively through the Bush administration – something the Republicans conveniently forget to mention.
Posted by: Dave | February 13, 2012, 7:59 am 7:59 am
Continuing resolutions and stuffing money in bills are not passing the budget. Anyhoo….
If anyone took poli sci 101, that was a easy catch…but not only did the COS say it once but three times that day…overtly implying the REPs will be at fault…when in fact the bipartisan vote will include DEMs who have their eyes wide open…
Posted by: Stan | February 13, 2012, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Continuing resolutions and stuffing money in bills are not passing the budget. Anyhoo….
Posted by: Stan | February 13, 2012, 8:18 am 8:18 am
The same continuing appropriations were used extensively throughout the Bush administration – something the Republicans conveniently forget to mention.
Posted by: Dave | February 13, 2012, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Posted by: Danny | February 13, 2012, 1:54 am 1:54 am
You disagree with initiatives to help minorities own their own homes? What a heartless liberal.
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2012, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Posted by: Dave | February 13, 2012, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Still shilling for Obama day and night? Why don’t find a job and pay taxes like everyone else? Taxpayers don’t like leeches.
Posted by: Dane | February 13, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Still shilling for Obama day and night? Why don’t find a job and pay taxes like everyone else? Taxpayers don’t like leeches.
Posted by: Dane | February 13, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Say the poster who posst repeatedly but doesn’t have the brains or character to do anything but hurl insults and use juvenile name calling.
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 8:59 am 8:59 am
So now the liberal Left’s Obama robots’ argument has now been reduced to; “Well, Bush did it too!” With just a touch of whining….
Posted by: newcountryman | February 13, 2012, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Just some perspective for the brain dead, Harry Reid has been the Senate Majority leader for the Democrats since January 3, 2007. Google on!
Posted by: newcountryman | February 13, 2012, 9:26 am 9:26 am
POSTED BY: DAN | FEBRUARY 12, 2012, 10:22 PM 10:22 PM you apparently are not affiliated with the oil or gas business, nor have a clue how it works.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 13, 2012, 9:33 am 9:33 am
The reality in today’s Senate is, it takes 60 votes to overcome the filibusters, threats of filibusters, and secret holds, that the Republicans are using on every single bill. In that respect, Lew was correct. I almost hope the Republicans DO win back the Senate but do NOT have a super-majority. It’s much easier to simply block everything than it is to actually create policy. As Boehner and the Republican-controlled House has learned.
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | February 13, 2012, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Lew knows that if he tosses the bait… CNN viewers will swallow it.
It has nothing to do with truth and integrity… “The ends justify the means”!
Posted by: Vote Loud | February 13, 2012, 9:52 am 9:52 am
Lew’s words echo those of the fraud for which he toils.Zero’s words have an expiration date simultaneous to their vacuous utterance.
Posted by: Demetrius | February 13, 2012, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Media and journalists: Please stop using the title or reference White House (Senate, Congressional, etc.) “official or spokesperson” in your postings. These individuals have names so please start using them. It will give the reader insight into who is speaking and allow us to form opinions as to who is credible and who is merely a spineless and cowardly mouthpiece.
Posted by: Larry | February 13, 2012, 10:25 am 10:25 am
“Reid and the DEMOCRATS ”
As one of the mental nutcase leftist representatives proudly stated when pressed about the budget…”we don’t need a budget to know how to spend money…”.
It is the fundiing of that payola which the lunatics have a problem with. But who is kidding whom…these criminals would not be bound by a budget anyway so it is a worthless exercise anyway.
Posted by: LogicalUS | February 13, 2012, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Since when is asking someone to work and pay taxes an insult?
Posted by: Trina | February 13, 2012, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Most politicians lie, but by official/unofficial media rules:
Democrats = misspoke
Republicans = lied
Posted by: rlo | February 13, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
It’s not very smart for Obama to run against a do nothing Demo Senate.
How can he win running against his own party?
Posted by: Noz | February 13, 2012, 11:55 am 11:55 am
I cannot believe what I’m reading. Lately I’ve noticed several times where Jake has actually done some good reporting and been quite fair. He better be careful. Too much being fair and ABC will show him the door!!!
Posted by: Bradley Howe | February 13, 2012, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Clinton’s former budget director used highly misleading language that blamed Republicans for the failure of the Democratic leadership. You don’t even need 50 votes, just a simple majority. He should know better, so he’s lying. Case closed.
Posted by: newcountryman | February 13, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Posted by: rlo | February 13, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Democrats = Changed Course
Republicans = Flip Flopped
Posted by: Sarah | February 13, 2012, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Much as I would like to give Lew the benefit of the doubt, what he said was just not true. And he repeated his false statement.
Every bit as troubling were the reactions of the “moderators,” David Gregory and George Stephanopolis. Neither reacted to Lew’s false claims or asked any serious follow up questions.
Posted by: Virginia Voter | February 13, 2012, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Since when is asking someone to work and pay taxes an insult?
Posted by: Trina | February 13, 2012, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Says the poster (Chuck) who posts repeatedly but doesn’t have the brains or character to do anything but hurl insults and use juvenile name calling. Live with the truth Chuck. Oh wait, I forgot about the lies and false accusations, more of your moral accomplishments.
Posted by: Jesse | February 13, 2012, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
OK, the Dems had the House AND 60 Senators for TWO years!
Why was there no budgets passed?
Posted by: edge | February 13, 2012, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Joe Wison was right and Obama and his inept administration prove it everyday.
OBAMACARE = YOU LIE
OBAMA BUDGET = YOU LIE
OBAMA ABOUT CONGRESS = YOU LIE
OBAMA ON AFGHANISTAN = YOU LIE
Posted by: myze | February 13, 2012, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
OBAMA AND HIS STAFF, PROVING JOE WILSON RIGHT ONE STATEMENT AT A TIME !
Posted by: MR HOLMES | February 13, 2012, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Under President Obama, US oil production has increased. It takes at least 3 years from the time an oil well is permitted until it is producing so this accomplishment is due to Bush’s policies. He managed to kill Bin Laden thanks to the Bush’s policies on interrogation and Obama not ending the policies. When the loudest critic of your policies achieves his greatest acomplishments because of them, that is called Vindication. Thank you George Bush
Posted by: Steve | March 8, 2012, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Yes, of course Steve. Killing Osama Bin Laden was Bush’s #1 priority.
“Who knows if he’s hiding in some cave or not, we haven’t heard from him in a long time…and the idea of focusing on one person idicates to me people really dont understand the scope of the mission…I don’t know where he is…I just don’t spend that much time thinking about him”
- George W. Bush, 2002
Posted by: Marla | May 1, 2012, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Mr. Holmes. A bit of info about little Joey Wilson:
Joe Wilson is a Col in the US Army reserves. I wish to request an Article 32 hearing for violation of Article 88 of the UCMJ, contemptuous words against the President of the US. If we cannot expect a full colonel in the Army reserves to obey the UCMJ, how do we expect the troops to behave with respect for their Commander in Chief? The Article provides that anyone found guilty of contemptuous words directed against the President, VP, etc., shall be punished as a court martial may provide.
Posted by: Marla | May 1, 2012, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm