JERUSALEM — Mitt Romney landed in Israel late today. This is Romney’s second stop on his first foreign trip as presumptive Republican nominee.
Romney will meet Sunday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other leaders before delivering a speech on the United States’ relationship with Israel.
Shortly before landing in Tel Aviv, foreign policy advisor Lanhee Chen briefed reporters on what to expect while in Israel.
Chen said Romney will not be criticizing the Obama Administration’s relationship with Israel. Chen said while on foreign soil, Romney does not want to appear critical of current U.S. foreign policy. Chen said in 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama had more freedom to discuss his own vision on foreign policy while traveling abroad because he was not running against an incumbent President.
But Chen’s comments come after Romney told an Israeli newspaper, the Haaretz Daily, that if he were president, “There will be no public denouncing of Israel by the U.S. in the UN… I believe that is the real way to achieve peace … by working with Israel, not creating distance between Israel and America.” The interview was conducted in London.
Chen repeatedly said this trip is an opportunity for Romney to hear from Israeli leaders about their concerns involving Iran and Syria.
Chen said Iran is “the biggest foreign policy challenge the world faces, not just Israel or America … the prospect of a nuclear Iran is an incredibly substantial problem.”
When I asked Chen how the Romney team reconciles what Romney said previously about Russia, calling that country the United States’ biggest foe, Chen answered, “Romney said Russia was our number one geopolitical foe. He was expressing concern that Russia interferes with a number of our policy objectives.”
Chen added: “Whether it’s Syria or Iran, Russia is certainly implicated as well. What you have to understand is there is a distinction between a country that consistently stands and opposes our interests versus a challenge that is posed by Iran going nuclear potentially.”
I asked whether the distinction was biggest “foe” versus biggest “threat?”
“Well, foreign policy is nuanced,” Chen said.
Meantime, Chen called the meetings in London “warm and productive,” saying chief among the concerns raised by leaders in the U.K. was the faltering Eurozone.
“The situation could get very ugly, very soon,” Chen said. “In the U.S., you hear all this analysis that this is a 4-month, or 6-month proposition, when in fact, it’s very helpful for us to hear a different perspective.”
“The message was this may happen sooner than you in the United States think this could happen,” Chen said. “They’re far more concerned about what’s happening in Europe than the U.S.”
Chen was also asked about the barrage of negative headlines in London after Romney told NBC he was not sure how well the London games would turn out. Romney saying he found some things “disconcerting” on the eve the games.
When asked about reports one adviser had blamed the comment on jet lag, Chen responded, “I don’t have anything to say on that. My general perspective is that different folks have a lot of different perspectives on things that happen.”
I asked whether Romney would say the same if asked all over again?
“Well, I think you heard him give his answer on the Olympics. I think he was expressing his thoughts on things he’d seen and heard in the news,” Chen said.
“Having spent time with UK officials, you know I think he feels it’s going to be a fantastic Olympic games,” Chen added.
Chen did mention another objective met while in London.
“Obviously the governor got the chance to go to the opening ceremonies. I understand he showed up on NBC… I understand people back home saw him, that’s a nice thing,” Chen said.
The Romney campaign timed the first leg of the foreign trip to coincide with the opening of the London Olympics, hoping for a photo-op reminding American voters of Romney’s history with the Salt Lake City games.
Email

Oh it was a photo op all along , now I see . Pretty wily character that Mitt . Can you say “backfired” ?
Posted by: daviem | July 28, 2012, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
““The situation could get very ugly, very soon,” Chen said. “In the U.S., you hear all this analysis that this is a 4-month, or 6-month proposition, when in fact, it’s very helpful for us to hear a different perspective.”
“The message was this may happen sooner than you in the United States think this could happen,” Chen said. “They’re far more concerned about what’s happening in Europe than the U.S.”…………….. I get so sick of the right using fear I could spit. That is the number one thing I loathe about the republicans right now. In fact if they’d shut up with the fear we could probably restore some consumer confidence in this country. But we know they don’t care about the country.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | July 28, 2012, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Actually, if the Republican Consgress would pass the jobs bill the President sent them last year, that could drop the unemployment rate a full percentage point lower according to the CBO. Of course the slow recovery is exactly what they want. They think we’re stupid enough to vote out the President but, they’re in for a surprise when we throw them out! The next time that orange faced John Boehner asks “Where Are the Jobs” someone should remind him that they’re in the legislation the President sent them that they WON’T PASS!
Posted by: roxsteadyone | July 28, 2012, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
By the way, Romney ran an ad during the Olympics last night that, while it wasn’t shown here on the East coast, was still a big mistake. In the ad, it shows President Obama back in 2009 after he got the Stimulus bill passed and he said that it would create three and a half to four million jobs. Now, as everyone here knows, after we lost 8 million jobs under Bush, how many jobs were created under the Stimulus? 4 MILLIOS JOBS! Obama was right! Thanks Mitt!
Posted by: roxsteadyone | July 28, 2012, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
“Well, foreign policy is nuanced,” Chen said.
Somebody better teach nuance to the infant Willard, if he succeeds in purchasing the White House……..
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | July 28, 2012, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
I get so sick of the right using fear I could spit. That is the number one thing I loathe about the republicans right now. In fact if they’d shut up with the fear we could probably restore some consumer confidence in this country. But we know they don’t care about the country. Posted by: lexingtonlady | July 28, 2012, 8:33 pm.
That is a deliberate strategy on their part. They KNOW that any positive movement in the economy is another nail in the coffin of their chances to hold the House and gain the Senate and the WH. This is textbook Karl Rove politics. They are ready willing and able to let America suffer ‘short term’ if it gains them their political goals. It borders on treason, IMO.
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | July 28, 2012, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm