
Image credit: Douglas Graham/CQ Roll Call/Getty Images
By MICHAEL FALCONE (@michaelpfalcone)
NOTABLES
- ‘POND SCUM’: That, according to ABC’s JEFF ZELENY, is the expression Sen. Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona, used to characterize how some critics viewed him after he voted against expanding background checks two week ago during the gun control debate in Congress. In a posting yesterday on his Facebook page, Flake conceded that his “poll numbers have indeed taken a southerly turn.” The gun control debate is quiet in Washington, but it is only getting started at home for some senators, particularly those who were on the fence but opposed a bipartisan compromise on expanding background checks for people who buy weapons at gun shows and on the internet. http://abcn.ws/Zkn0XP
- NEWTOWN GOES TO THE GRANITE STATE: Zeleny notes that Sen. Kelly Ayotte, Republican of New Hampshire, faced a confrontational exchange during a town meeting yesterday in Warren, N.H. The daughter of the principal killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School challenged Ayotte on her vote against the background check measure, according to the Political Scoop blog on WMUR.com. “You had mentioned that date you voted, owners of gun stores that the expanded background checks would harm,” said Erica Lafferty, whose mother was killed in the Newtown, Conn., shooting four months ago. “I’m just wondering why the burden in of my mother being gunned down in the halls of her elementary school isn’t as important.” Ayotte has been besieged with advertising from both sides of the gun debate. She apologized to Lafferty for her loss, but renewed her objections to the background check bill, saying she did not believe it would have prevented the mass shooting in Newtown. http://abcn.ws/Zkn0XP
- U.S. EXPANDING SUPPORT TO SYRIAN REBELS: President Obama has directed his national security team to identify ways to significantly ramp up U.S. support of the opposition forces battling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, ABC’s JONATHAN KARL reports. Among the options under consideration are supplying arms to rebel forces, although no decision on that has been made. The first step will likely be a dramatic expansion of non-lethal aid to opposition fighters. “The items to be supplied will be decided after consultations with the Supreme Military Command,” National Security Council Spokesperson Caitlin Hayden tells ABC News. “Additional communications equipment, armor, night vision goggles and vehicles are among the items being discussed.” Hayden also suggested aid to the rebels could go beyond such non-lethal assistance.
THE ROUNDTABLE
ABC’s RICK KLEIN: It’s already become trite to reference Scott Brown in stories of why impossible upsets may just be possible in special Senate elections. That’s especially true in Massachusetts (or, maybe soon, New Hampshire). But you’d be hard-pressed to cast a more nationally compelling candidate than Gabriel Gomez, the new GOP Senate nominee in Massachusetts: Son of Colombian immigrants, Naval Academy, Navy SEAL, Harvard MBA, successful businessman. There’s no questioning Rep. Ed Markey’s Democratic credentials or legislative record. To continue the too-well-worn comparisons, he’s no Martha Coakley. But Markey has hardly had to campaign for decades, and hasn’t run statewide since he briefly sought this same Senate seat back in … 1984. This race will be Markey’s to lose until Gomez can prove he can compete. Democrats won’t let this one slip away without a fight. Republicans, though, overwhelmingly chose the candidate who’s bound to make Democrats sweat it out.
ABC’s SHUSHANNAH WALSHE: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is out with his first television ad of his gubernatorial re-election campaign. Sixty seconds long, the ad will begin running in the major media markets of New York City and Philadelphia Wednesday. Christie’s campaign announced that the buy will be large — $1.2 million. Although the ad doesn’t directly mention Superstorm Sandy, which hit the state six months ago, there are images throughout. “Working with Democrats and Republicans, believing as long as you stick to your principals compromise isn’t a dirty word,” the narrator says as the ad shows Christie shaking hands, greeting voters and comforting New Jersey residents after Sandy. “But the most important thing he did has little to do with numbers, statistics or even politics: He made us proud to say we’re from New Jersey.” The ad ends with video of Christie looking at the Seaside Heights, New Jersey skyline. Christie’s opponent, Democratic State Sen. Barbara Buono, has not launched any television ads of her own yet. Christie is heavily favored in the race. The most recent Quinnipiac University poll conducted earlier this month showed Christie ahead of Buono by 32 points, 58 to 26 percent. http://abcn.ws/11XbCDs
ABC’s MICHAEL FALCONE: That Mark Zuckeberg is facing liberal ire over television ads his political groups sponsored patting lawmakers on the back for opposing Obamacare and supporting expanded oil drilling should come as little surprise to the Facebook founder who is now dabbling more actively in politics than ever before. But perhaps the fact that Zuckerberg is willing to help bankroll the commercials, which are in service of his main goal — achieving comprehensive immigration reform – shouldn’t be so shocking to progressive activists either. After all, Zuckerberg is something of a political man of mystery. For example, Zuckerberg and other technology leaders dined with President Obama in February 2011 and he hosted the president at a friendly town hall meeting two months later at Facebook’s offices. But he also threw a fundraiser earlier this year for Gov. Chris Christie, the New Jersey Republican and potential 2016 presidential contender. According to the Wall Street Journal, Zuckerberg is registered to vote in Santa Clara County but did not state a party preference.
HAPPENING TODAY: Freedom House will release their latest report today, “Press Freedom in 2012: Middle East Volatility Amid Global Decline.” The report found that In 2012, the percentage of people worldwide who enjoy a free media environment fell to its lowest point in more than a decade. Freedom House is convening a discussion today at the Newseum in Washington, DC moderated by ABC’s REENA NINAN. Panelists include: Karin Deutsch Karlekar, PhD, Project Director, Freedom of the Press; Jackie Northam, Foreign Correspondent, National Public Radio; and Adel Iskandar, PhD, Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University and media scholar. More information: http://bit.ly/17vwaGl
BUZZ
MARK ZUCKERBERG’S POLITICAL STATUS: IT’S COMPLICATED. Less than three weeks after Mark Zuckerberg officially launched his pro-immigration reform group, the billionaire technology mogul seems to be experiencing the Facebook equivalent of a liberal de-friending. ABC’s MICHAEL FALCONE reports that progressive activists have been voicing their disapproval after two Zuckerberg-backed groups unveiled television ads last week praising lawmakers for opposing Obamacare and supporting an expansion of the Keystone oil pipeline and drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The ads are meant to provide political cover for three senators — Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina; Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida; and Mark Begich, Democrat of Alaska — to cast politically risky votes in favor of immigration reform. Those television commercials led the Sierra Club to post a message on its Facebook page on Monday urging Zuckerberg to “re-think his priorities.” At least two other groups — CREDO Action, the liberal arm of CREDO Mobile, a cellular phone company, and the “climate safety” organization, 350.org — publicly lashed out at Zuckerberg this week. A CREDO spokeswoman said 18,5000 people signed an online petition condemning the ads and, along with 350.org, they are planning a protest outside Facebook headquarters in California today. http://abcn.ws/YmcmEX
MORE FROM THE SIERRA CLUB: “Just last week, the Sierra Club announced our support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants — so we know how important immigration reform is to the future of our country,” Michael Brune, the group’s executive director, said in a statement to ABC News. “The way to achieve reform, however, isn’t by pushing dirty fuel schemes that threaten our future and our families. Mark Zuckerberg has made comments in the past recognizing that we need to pursue a clean energy future, and there is no reason he needs to trade those principles for a few political points.” http://abcn.ws/YmcmEX
ED MARKEY, GABRIEL GOMEZ WIN SENATE PRIMARIES IN MASSACHUSETTS. Democratic U.S. Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Republican businessman Gabriel Gomez were the winners of yesterday;s primary for the special election to fill the U.S. Senate seat vacated when John Kerry became Secretary of State, ABC’s SHUSHANNAH WALSHE reports. Markey, a House member since 1976, bested U.S. Rep Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., and Gomez beat out former acting ATF director and former U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan, as well as state legislator and former general counsel to Mitt Romney, Dan Winslow, the Associated Press determined. Markey and Gomez will face off in the general election on June 25. Markey was heavily favored to beat Lynch and had the backing of establishment Democrats in the state. “On the Democratic side, it’s a decisive victory for Ed Markey and, for all intents and purposes, he was the official Democratic nominee although the party was ostensibly neutral,” Tufts political science professor Jeffrey Berry told ABC News. Lynch was the more conservative Democrat and tried to appeal to more blue-collar Democratic voters, but he was also up against Markey’s well-organized machine. Gomez, a Latino businessman in the state and a former Navy SEAL with a Harvard MBA, is a political newcomer, but his moderate appeal won over voters in blue Massachusetts. Although Markey will be heavily favored to win the general election, Berry said it will be a real fight despite Markey’s organization. http://abcn.ws/12jZQl8
NOTED: Craig Varoga, a strategist at the pro-Democratic Senate Majority super PAC, penned a memo titled: “Gabriel Gomez Is Mitt Romney Jr.” Here’s an excerpt: “After barely escaping with a narrow victory over less than stellar opponents in a low turnout primary, Gabriel Gomez is now bringing his ‘I am Mitt Romney Jr.’ campaign to the general election. From protecting special tax breaks for billionaires at the expense of seniors and students, to surrounding himself with political insiders from Romney 2012, to talking out of both sides of his mouth, Gabriel Gomez is running a ‘Mini Me’ retread of Mitt Romney’s epic failure of a presidential campaign. Maybe that’s why Gomez’s staff is a Romney reunion.” Full memo: http://bit.ly/12So60y
MARK SANFORD’S DAY OF ENDORSEMENTS. On Monday night, South Carolina House candidate and the state’s former governor, Mark Sanford, debated Elizabeth Colbert Busch, fending off mentions of his affair before a raucous crowd. Yesterday, the endorsements rolled in. The National Republican Congressional Committee already pulled its support for Sanford but on Tuesday Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., offered his backing, and the conservative group FreedomWorks followed suit. So did Larry Flynt. The noted porn king, candidate and political agitator released a sarcastic YouTube endorsement of Sanford as “America’s great sex pioneer,” announced a donation of a legal-maximum $2,600 to Sanford’s campaign, and invited Sanford to “meet with me, man to man, for a photo opportunity and to shake my hand in gratitude for my endorsement.” In the video — either falsely or earnestly — Flynt praised Sanford for exposing the “sexual hypocrisy of traditional values in America today” — and praised pro-Sanford voters for their willingness to allegedly reject those values in favor of Sanford’s candidacy. http://abcn.ws/14R5L84
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION DENIES BENGHAZI WHISTLEBLOWERS BEING KEPT QUIET. More than seven months after the attack Sept. 11, 2012, on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, the Obama administration continues to defend itself against allegations from House Republicans that the administration has not fully cooperated with Congress on the investigation into the attack, notes ABC’s DANA HUGHES. On Tuesday, both President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry addressed claims being made by House Oversight and Foreign Affairs Committee leaders that the administration is impeding the Congressional testimony of State Department and CIA employees who survived the attack. “I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody’s been blocked from testifying,” said the president. “What I’ve been very clear about from the start is that our job with respect to Benghazi has been to find out exactly what happened, to make sure that U.S. embassies, not just in the Middle East but around the world, are safe and secure and to bring those who carried it out to justice.” Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Kerry said “there’s an enormous amount of misinformation out there” about Benghazi. He referenced his testimony before the House two weeks ago, when he told members that the State Department would work closely with Congress to clear up any lingering questions about the attacks so that everyone could move on and begin focusing on other pressing global issues. “I do not want to spend the next year coming up here talking about Benghazi,” Kerry said. http://abcn.ws/18o9I0w
WHAT WE’RE WATCHING
YOUNG MINDS WITH BIG IDEAS: MEET THE WHIZ KIDS OF THE WHITE HOUSE SCIENCE FAIR. 10-year-old Evan Jackson had just made a touchdown in his football game, but he had to be pulled off to the sideline because he had overheated. It got him thinking, along with his brother Alec and cousin Caleb: what if there were a way to keep football players cool and hydrated without having to leave the field? The three boys–all elementary school students from McDonough, Georgia–came up with a prototype of a hydration and cooling system for football players. And along with 30 students, they were invited to present their award-winning science and engineering project to President Obama at the 3rd Annual White House Science Fair. “The idea of cool pads is shoulder pads that have an ice pack and Gatorade built in to prevent against heat exhaustion and save lives,” they explain to Politics Confidential, pointing to their display set up inside the White House. “It works by using three basic features–the compression shirt, the helmet, and the shoulder pads.” To hear more about these big ideas from young brains, and to judge for yourself whether President Obama or ABC’s JONATHAN KARL generated more clean water, check out this episode of “Politics Confidential.” http://yhoo.it/ZVEpJw
WHO’S TWEETING?
@LangerResearch: 70% support death penalty if accused Boston Bomber is convicted; 3 in 4 support federal trial: http://abcn.ws/1013xuw #poll
@BDayspring: Maureen Dowd calls Obama a Lame Duck… Says he should grab that drink with Mitch McConnell. That Maureen Dowd. Ouch. http://ow.ly/kBkzL
@andymstone: Why are House GOPers afraid to meet their constituents this recess? Let’s look at just the top 4 reasons: http://youtu.be/vxPcGRNvqHw
@motherjones: What the NRA’s Millions Do—And Don’t—Buy http://bit.ly/12UQLSp
@politicalwire: Rep. Jack Kingston appears to be readying a GA-Sen announcement for later this week http://politicalwire.com/archives/2013/05/01/kingston_seems_to_be_readying_senate_announcement.html …
Email

You lost. Get over it!!!
Posted by: Perplexed | May 1, 2013, 9:53 am 9:53 am
To all the United State Senators – Thank you for making the right decision. Despite the medias agenda, the people of America appreciate you respecting our second amendment rights!!!!!!
Posted by: SecondAmendment | May 1, 2013, 10:01 am 10:01 am
FALCONE: You forget to mention all the Democratic Senators that voted for it and their state did not want it….so bias, you just have to write about any Republican in a derogatory manner…Dems who voted for Obamacare, gun control, etc. are going down in a lot of states. Why not right about that?
Posted by: Freedom | May 1, 2013, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Wow ABC News can’t let this useless background check gun issue fade into the darkness from which it came.
Posted by: Noz | May 1, 2013, 10:50 am 10:50 am
how about background checks for suspected terrorists who fly to chechnya? how bout following up on warnings fr4om russia? get a life, i dont rust my security any police and in particular the feds.gtood a catching people not so good at stopping crime.
clean up chicago first then i will listen.
Posted by: catman | May 1, 2013, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens.”
Posted by: Will | May 1, 2013, 11:04 am 11:04 am
pond scum about the same level as the news on ABC
Posted by: thomas | May 1, 2013, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Sen. Jeff Flake, you are a hero for standing up to protect my 2nd amendment rights. Gun control will NOT stop violent gun crimes, gun control will only give the Government CONTROL.
Posted by: Harley | May 1, 2013, 11:18 am 11:18 am
“Where are the BACKGROUND CHECKS on these politicians? Did you read Obama’s book? ILLEGAL DRUG ABUSER with UNRESOLVED MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES.”
Biden ….. FIVE deferments to AVOID serving this Nation. Biden has repeatedly proven himself too INCOMPETENT to handle his own affairs.
Posted by: Drago | May 1, 2013, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Authorities say a 5-year-old child in Kentucky shot and killed his 2-year-old sister with a rifle he got as a gift.
Posted by: m33 | May 1, 2013, 11:31 am 11:31 am
For any of you Liberals out there still crying big crocodile tears over your loss on Gun-Control, I got a box of tissues and a huge tree in my backyard you can hug…
Posted by: Derek | May 1, 2013, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Spring awakening? Support for stronger gun control is falling fast. People are waking up and realizing that the gun control people don’t want to make anyone safer. They just want to push their extremest agenda. Look at the polls. Very few support stronger gun control laws.
Posted by: Barnaby Jones | May 1, 2013, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Thanks Guys for protecting the 2nd amendment.obama and feinstein seem to think our Constitution is a useless piece of paper.
Posted by: Duane | May 1, 2013, 11:46 am 11:46 am
To all those that support the 2A. Strengthen your resolve, take pride of what we have accomplished in the last 30 years. Back then, we had 1 state with constitutional carry. Today we have 4. Back then 14 states were May issue, a few were Shall issue, the rest were NO issue. Today, we only have Illinois and DC that will NOT issue a conceal carry permit. And EVERY other state is may issue in some way.
In 2010, 15k+ felons tried to buy guns through legit gun dealers. Of the 250 or so case tried by the DOJ, they prosecuted ONLY 44 of them. The anger of Mom’s demand action is in the WRONG direction. Just what we need is another law to be ignored.
Posted by: Mitch | May 1, 2013, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Extending background checks won’t stop anything. People that can’t legally buy guns will seek people illegally selling guns. The killer’s mother in Newtown bought the weapons legally. The boy took them and caused all hell. So how would expanded background checks stop this from happening if it was already implemented beforehand? Would the weapons shock him based on his intentions? Come on people. Start thinking with your heart and use that noodle in your dome collecting dust. A piece of paper has never stopped a bullet to this date. Let this debate die. It is pointless and useless to even attempt to regulate behavior. Regulating behavior is about as effective as winning the War on Terror: IT CAN’T BE DONE.
Behavior is a noun, but it is an idea built by the mind. It is not something you can physically grasp with your hands. The only way to destroy an idea is to destroy humanity as a whole.
Posted by: Paul | May 1, 2013, 11:59 am 11:59 am
I am neither Republican nor Democrat. Some of my opinions are inline with liberal philosophies while some are conservative. One thing that is absolute ,however, is no one that supports limiting my Constitutional Rights will EVER get my vote.
Posted by: Mark | May 1, 2013, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Funny how ABC conveniently forgot to publish Ayotte’s response, in which she observed (correctly) that background checks would have had no effect on the Newtown incident. There is no way to take gun grabbing shills who write these pieces seriously until they report objectively, but I’m not holding my breath.
Posted by: Mark | May 1, 2013, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
More about gun control – EVERY DAY ALL DAY LONG! If you don’t think the press, Obama and the Demoncats are pulling out all the stops to take away your freedom and your guns so you are helpless, you haven’t been paying attention.
Posted by: Don | May 1, 2013, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
It’s all about control to the liberal extremists. Freedom is no barrier to their decisions. Responsibility is unknown. Point the finger of blame and take from those that are good. That is the motto of the liberal extremist.
Posted by: Mat p | May 1, 2013, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Myself I think anyone who wants to violate the 1902 Dick amendment and violate the 2nd amendment is a commie and should be shotgunned in the face.
Posted by: Bob Danger | May 1, 2013, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
’18,5000 people signed an online petition’
18,5000?!! Only liberals could come up with a number like that! I guess some of them must have signed more than once! LOL!!
Posted by: Sean | May 1, 2013, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
So why are gun right supporers afraid of a background check? Something to hide? I would think they would support it to make sure no one who shouldn’t have a gun gets one. Their argument about and infringement of rights which is ridiculous.
Posted by: Mike | May 1, 2013, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
While most of us Americans agree with background checks we don’t trust the Government at this time. This started with a law to criminalize many types of firearms just go ask Feinstein and Obama. But can someone please explain why the federal Government fails to enforce the laws already on the books? BTW we already have background checks!
Posted by: sirock | May 1, 2013, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
We are not afraid of a background check, the problem was if I lend my wife a gun or my son I could face 5 years in prison if I did not do a background check on her or him, also goes for friend etc on your own property.
Posted by: rod r | May 1, 2013, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
We conducted a 10-year experiment 1994-2004 on banning Rambo-looking rifles. Nobody is claiming it did a darn thing except temporarily increase their value. We also conducted an experiment in liberal welfare from Pres. Johnson to Clinton until Newt Gingrich proposed welfare reform. Russia conducted an experiment in Marxism for 62 years — Cuba and N. Korea are still conducting theirs.
Liberals accuse conservative of having values on issues based on religion. It appears more and more that liberal ideology IS a religion.
Posted by: Ron G | May 1, 2013, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
how about a background check on welfare recipients and links to the terrorists watch lists by the cia fbi and homeland security? since most mass murders have a liberal leaning how about a background check of all liberals?
Posted by: catman | May 1, 2013, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Seventy MILLION gun sold since Obama was sworn the second time. NRA has a MILLION and counting new members since Sandy Hook.
Ruger has backorders for 2 MILLION guns. Go to the sporting goods section of any Walmart and look at the empty ammunition shelves.
AR15′s and the ammo magazines for them are sold out for YEARS. Gun shops are laying off employees because they don’t have anything to sell.
The largest civilian rearmament in human history continues, limited only by a lack of supply.
This is a population preparing for war. Do Obama and democrats really want to go here?
Posted by: AR15owner | May 1, 2013, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Mike | May 1, 2013, 12:34 pm —- The mother of the shooter had a background check when she bought her gun. It didn’t stop a crazy person from getting them.
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
This is a population preparing for war———-no, wackos are stockpiling
Posted by: klimpt | May 1, 2013, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Meanwhile in Colorado every liberal State politician who voted to subvert the civil rights of their constituents are facing recall petitions. As the second amendment goes, so goes the rest. Wake up America.
We the people expect our elected officials to honor their oaths of office. When they refuse, cast them out post haste.
Posted by: LeDroit | May 1, 2013, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
To gun control advocates, we will never yield and never surrender to your unconstitutional attempts.
Posted by: Elsewhere | May 1, 2013, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Why make it easy for criminals and the mentally ill to buy assault type weapons.
All thats being asked for at this time is stricter background check requirements, no one is trying to take your guns
The republicans are magnificent.
They are like Don Quixote tilting at big government windmills.
They don’t realize they live in the freest most open society in world made possible by a government designed 250 years ago.
Everything they do is from mis-interpretation and lack of knowledge of the Constitution that makes that government work.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Americans need to remember those who work against the constitution come election time.
why do so many foreigners want to come to America? a democratic form of government is so much better than any other. the opportunities are so much great here for those willing to put in the effort than elsewhere. nuff said !!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: justin | May 1, 2013, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 1:48 pm — Obama, a supposed “Constitutional Scholar” (no reference), has been PROVEN Unconstitutional on several occasions. Who’s “lack of knowledge” were you talking about again? Shall not be infringed is very clear and gun control nuts have lost….yet again.
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
abc news is not a credible news source. They are biased, politically motivated. They do the American people a disservice. There misinformation, disinformation should be addressed. Because of there bias they should be censored .
Posted by: Joel Grantham | May 1, 2013, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
COMMONSENSE
Yes he is, and has probably read the second amendment in full.
I suggest the republicans read it also, in entirety and not pick out and change words.
The 2nd amendment doesn’t give anyone the right to own any type of weapon they choose. Read the finding by Justice Scalia in the Heller case.
Another “important limitation,” explained Scalia, was contained in the justices’ 1939 decision in Miller v. U.S. “Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.’ We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons,’ ” he wrote. Based on Miller, the “Second Amendment does not protect weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns, he added “.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Thanks Mike for keeping this in the news so folks won’t forget or be confused about who tried to strip their rights at the next election.
Posted by: Rotory Wing Pilot | May 1, 2013, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 2:17 pm — I don’t care about the Heller case or Scalia. You should probably look up the definition of “arms”, because that is what is protected by the 2A. ’”" We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons,’ “” What do I care what several washed up judges THINK? It seems more of a statement, not a ruling.
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 2:17 pm —- In short, change the 2nd amendment if you believe what the justices “thought”. We’ll wait.
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Russia conducted an experiment in Marxism for 62 years — Cuba and N. Korea are still conducting theirs.
Liberals accuse conservative of having values on issues based on religion. It appears more and more that liberal ideology IS a religion.
Posted by: Ron G | May 1, 2013, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Look up “The Naked Communist” goals. This was written in 1963 and should be scary to everyone. It is amazing how much the liberals/Communists have completed on this list of 45 declared goals for a Comunist takeover of America.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | May 1, 2013, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Background checks are a great idea, BUT:
1) Who is a criminal?? Anyone on parole? Anyone indicted or charged? What about the guy who got out of prison 20 years ago and is a model citizen?? Will the US save this information so they can confiscate weapons when they choose??
2) Who is nuts?? Is it based on medication?? Or the last shrink you saw??
3) It’s real easy for Congress to slip in an amendment to expand the check, surrepticiously, or worse, for the POtuS to issue an Executive Order, and do what he wants, like he’s trying to now.
Posted by: jimmy | May 1, 2013, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
POLICE: Liberal student activist threatened herself with rape in FACEBOOK hoax, framed conservatives…
That the type of story that ABC loves to block…liki the Gosnell trial
Pathetic high school journalism at ABC
Posted by: Yep I said that | May 1, 2013, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Carney: Benghazi happened a LONG time ago..at the press briefing today
Coverup in full mode as White House denies knowing about threatening whistle blowers
Impeachment brewing?
ABC goes into defense mode?
Posted by: Yep I said that | May 1, 2013, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
These gun control folks obviously have no respect for our Senate, Bill of Rights, or the will of the American people. Their agenda is becoming threatening and socialist.
Posted by: Alex | May 1, 2013, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
COMMONSENSE
Despite the republican contempt for the Supreme Court, these men and women are eminently qualified to rule on the Constitution.
As Scalia says, the government can ban the sale of even sawed-off shotguns and be well within the Constitutional requirements.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
YEP I SAID THAT
Impeachment is about as likely as the apocalypse. The republicans know all this political theatre they are playing is not selling to the American people.
In fact, we democrats would love to see the republicans even start to talk about impeachment. We know all the success they had doing it against President Clinton.
The republicans are doomed in 2014 and 2016; impeachment would even make their disaster worse.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 2:56 pm — Always with the partisan stuff, you really need to get away from our 2 party BS. They both suck, so simply admitting it and getting out of denial is the way to go. I agree they are qualified to rule on the Constitution, but I don’t need to hear from you or them what they “think”. Make a ruling and press on. Gun control failed and Obama will recover from it. Now, how about we get back to the economy and jobs?
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 3:13 pm — You mean, success? “”"”"Bill Clinton, 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998.”"”"”
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
COMMONSENSE
Your right, there are problems with both parties especially in Congress.
I just love to counter the right wing conservatives who only focus on one man. It’s like shooting fish in the barrel, they are so blinded by their hate, and they have lost their ability to think logically.
You’re also right; we should be debating about JOBS. I think we are going to have to spend a lot of money to get this economy moving. I don’t see how we can by doing the opposite and cutting spending.
It hasn’t worked in Europe and the FED is positive proof that the 85 billion they are putting into the housing market every month is working, home sells jumped 9.7 % last month and now the housing shortage will produce construction jobs.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 3:41 pm —- Actually, there is no shortage and the housing market is not the place to focus on jobs. It will take years if not a decade to return to normal. Obama should start with authorizing the pipeline now. What is he waiting for? Democrats projected 5000-20000 jobs and possibly more, so what’s the hold up? We also need to trade more with Canada whenever possible. We need new oil refineries here to be able to refine different types of oil. We can use some nuclear power and desalinization plants to counter the drought stricken areas. All of those WILL produce jobs. Obama is so set on alternative energy that he doesn’t seem to understand we have yet to find a replacement for oil. Wind, solar, waves are all good, butnot replacements. We will need oil for the foreseeable future and we need to understand and embrace it. Only then will we lower our dependence on OPEC.
Posted by: Commonsenseparty | May 1, 2013, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
COMMONSENSE
The Keystone Pipeline, at best estimates, will add 5,000 temporary jobs, and most them them will go to Canadian contractors who have already been working on it.
We have to balance the risks with the benefits.
This is the dirtiest oil in the world, refineries don’t want it, it’s too expensive to clean for gasoline. Most of the pipeline flow will be put aboard tankers and shipped to China.
The pipeline and shipping would have been much less expensive if it ran to Vancouver or Calgary on the Canadian west coast, but the Canadian provinces along the way don’t want it running through their territory.
There are other and better projects that need done. Example: California, Nevada and Arizona are running out of water for agriculture. A project like the Arizona Project started in the 1930s (Hoover Dam was a part) should be started. It will cost money but will return that investment many fold in the future.
We need that infra-structure bank now. Then the states themselves could begin many of the projects they need, right now. Once the housing market has finished stabilizing , the FED could but that 85 billion/month in that bank.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
How nice of ABC to always assume that gun control is what everyone wants, and that all of America is on board with Obama’s elitist agenda. Here’s an idea, ABC: how about if you try being an objective news agency instead of being a shill for a liberal administration? Go ahead, try it. Just once.
Posted by: Dan Shaw | May 1, 2013, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
DAN SHAW
You seem to forget that 94% of Americans support the Presidents elitist agenda of stricter background checks, including hunters and other gun owners.
At least we could have done at least this if the republicans (and yes some democrats) weren’t small change in the gun manufacturer’s pockets.
I never thought any meaningful gun legislation would get through Congress. We need to settle this in the legal system. The victims need to sue the manufacturers and gun dealers. Hopefully the NRA can’t buy juries.
Posted by: tmferretti | May 1, 2013, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm