SOPA: Internet Piracy Bill Criticized as Internet Censorship

Getty Images
SOPA — the Stop Online Piracy Act — has been presented in the House of Representatives as a way to protect movie studios, record labels and others whose music and films are taken and copied online. There was a hearing on it today. Its Senate counterpart is called the Protect IP Act.
But others are calling them flawed bills that would lead to Internet censorship.
Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google, said the bills would overdo it — giving copyright holders and government the power to cut off websites unreasonably. They could be shut down, and search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo could be stopped from linking to them.
“The solutions are draconian,” Schmidt said Tuesday at the MIT Sloan School of Management. “There’s a bill that would require ISPs [Internet service providers] to remove URLs from the Web, which is also known as censorship last time I checked.”
That said, Schmidt granted that Hollywood studios have a real problem — people are pirating their movies and threatening their business. The Motion Picture Association of America has posted promos on YouTube to plead its case.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who chairs the House Judiciary Committee and sponsored SOPA, has said his bill will help “stop the flow of revenue to rogue websites and ensures that the profits from American innovations go to American innovators.”
Now Tumblr, the microblogging website, has joined the opposition to the bills with a page called “Protect the Net.”
“As written, they would betray more than a decade of US policy and advocacy of Internet freedom,” said a statement on Tumblr, “by establishing a censorship system using the same domain blacklisting technologies pioneered by China and Iran.”

Email
Solar Eclipse Seen Only by Satellite
TechBytes (02.22.12) 




RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Pirating movies has been easy to do ever since the companies started releasing them on VHS for anyone who knew how to do it, and it wasn’t difficult to figure out. The question is: why are they so concerned about it now?
You might want to say that it’s the result of the internet making it more accessible, but that’s not even close to being true. It takes longer to download a movie than it did to copy from VHS to VHS. Even now, people can copy movies easily from DVD to their computers in minutes with the right program.
The reality of it was that the companies who made movies were not content with the money they were making off theater ticket sales, so they began releasing movies for home sales. Despite the fact that, even now, they still make loads of money from home sales, they’re still not satisfied with what they’re getting. It’s about greed, plain and simple.
The only difference between now and then is that corporate money is more prevalent in politics today than it ever has been.
Posted by: AmericaThePitiful | November 16, 2011, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I couldn’t agree more with the above poster. Anyone that has been overseas knows that Americans do not pirate near as much as other countries. You can go to Iraq or Afghanistan and buy a DVD of a movie that isn’t even in theatre yet for $1.
For the entertainment industry to put the blame on Americans and allow censorship of American websites is outrageous. We are such a small part of the Earth’s population and we KNOW that they are looking for copyright pirates yet they don’t really care about the countries that have known desire to track down such trivial affairs. This bill is just straight up garbage.
Posted by: iFightForThis? | November 16, 2011, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Um, I don’t think it’s the Piracy that is the issue, I think it’s the Crap Hollywood is putting out in place of actual scripting and dialogue and oh yeah, acting.
Posted by: Mike B | November 16, 2011, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
America is becoming china SO i’m moving to Japan! Sarabara bake’ro!
Posted by: Washington | November 16, 2011, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
I thought the Republicans were for less intrusive government. I guess I’m wrong. They are only for whatever their corporate masters want.
Posted by: DJ | November 16, 2011, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Uhm DJ, I don’t recall them ever saying that this was a Republican proposition…
Posted by: Aeifor | November 16, 2011, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
This is about Congress and their Corporate Masters becoming more nervous about what their constituents are learning and sharing about them and their illegal activities, crimes against humanity and their desire to control everything. We need to face the fact that our elected officials are the lowest representation of a human being and should be arrested for treason. Just look up and smell the chem-trails and you will see that they don’t care about any-ones well being, or any-ones pockets except their own. This is about their desire to control peoples ability to access alternative media also, and that my friends is the police state you now occupy.
Posted by: duddits | November 16, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Y’know, if they pass this, it might force the people’s hand to come up with an ad-hoc internet. It might be a good thing.
Posted by: Cru | November 16, 2011, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I for one support this act…it’s appalling. Truly appalling how much filth is on the internet today…I for one wouldn’t want my daughter being exposed to trash like that
Posted by: Evangalist | November 16, 2011, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
^ That’s what parental controls are for :)
Posted by: john | November 16, 2011, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
thi isnt about anything more than people comitting acts that are illegal and debilitate the economy. it doesnt matter wether or not it’s in the united states in a majority, it’s that it’s there and they want it to stop. they also dont have the power or authority to reach into other countries to stop people that do this, thats why if someone kills someone they flee the country, they cant be caught in other countries.
and who ever thinks they are protecting their children with this is an idiot. did you even go to school as a child? did you have friends? because internet and t.v. is not where they get this stuff it’s from adults and other kids. dont blame the internet because you think your child having knowledge is a problem, when all they really are is more aware. america is a stuck up country that has more freedom (for now) but is so uptight about all the other crap in the world that they cant actually control.
JOHN, i appluad your wise words.
Posted by: stop | November 16, 2011, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
If you support this act, you support policies derived from Hitler’s Reich.
Posted by: Terry Franco | November 16, 2011, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
The more laws, the more criminals.
Posted by: Cru | November 16, 2011, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
This is what you call “The first step into Communism” if the bill pass.
Posted by: ACT | November 16, 2011, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
“I for one wouldn’t want my daughter being exposed to trash like that”
That’s why you’re supposed to monitor your kid’s activities on the internet. Take responsibility for your own kids, and stop handing the job of raising your children to television and the internet. Neither of them were created to be babysitters because you can’t be bothered to be involved in your own children’s lives.
Posted by: AmericaThePitiful | November 16, 2011, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
MORE GOVERNMENT CONTROL over the people!
regulate, regulate,regulate…
This is another bill designed o take away freedom and give big government even more control!
Posted by: mmm | November 16, 2011, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
If the bill is passed, more people will be going to jail for illegal actions, which means our taxes will increse, which means our pocket money for helping the economy will decrease, which means our national debt will increase!
Posted by: justcallmesly | November 16, 2011, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Apparently Evangelist doesn’t believe she’s a good enough parent to keep her daughter away from “trash”. It’s good that she’s okay admitting she’s a terrible mother, and she’d rather have the government take care of her child. They always know what’s best!
Posted by: SP | November 16, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
This is crazy why not focus time and money into something other then what can not be helped. The issue with pirate movies is mostly not an american thing so many of these movies come from overseas doing that will do nothing and there are hackers that will easily find another way to get around them. We should’t be focusing out TIME AND MONEY on issues that aren’t this important right now.This issues that take more then the censorship to fix and it take more planing and time to do because there are so many bugs with the bill, its nonsense lets focus on something way more important like lowering the unemployment rate. Our congress never fails to amaze me straight nonsense .
Posted by: sabrina | November 16, 2011, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
If this passes, internet money will dry up QUICK. This won’t just affect piracy, this will enable people that already use courts to stifle competition to tear down competition through things as simple as a few links left on a comment section. Don’t think it will happen? Its already been attempted and only thwarted by the current laws not allowing it.
Posted by: Michael | November 17, 2011, 12:09 am 12:09 am
If Congress passes this it will be just another prime example of what morons we have operating our government.
Posted by: J | November 17, 2011, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Funny: Eric Schmidt, the guy who’s quoted above fearmongering about the supposed horrors of the bill, just happens to be an executive of Google — the world’s biggest copyright infringer. (It has copied millions of books without permission and makes money from illegally copied copyrighted material on its YouTube site, among other things.) Seems to me that the fuss is more corporate shenanigans than Congressional shenanigans.
Posted by: Brett Glass | November 17, 2011, 1:13 am 1:13 am
Where is Obama when you need him!?!?!?! I thought he liked the internet!
Posted by: Kevin C | November 17, 2011, 1:30 am 1:30 am
This is ridiculous, and an infringement to 1st ammendment rights, if you want to stop piracy, don’t do it with a bill that will inevitably be used to silence protests or control the flow of media. The thing here is, you can stop piracy to an extent by placing tighter watch on websites that propagate illegal media and fine them for such, clearly outlined behaviour, but regulating the internet to the extent of yerminating websites based upon a link, that’s ludacris, unnecessary and unconstitutional.
Posted by: Travers | November 17, 2011, 2:54 am 2:54 am
I’m really very curious and concerned as to whether this passed… I should hope not. It is well thought out and gives way to much power to those select few. Not like the multibillion industry of movies really needs anymore money.
I have a feeling that if it does, Anonymous will go into full on destruction mode. “We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.” With a motto like that, and an already open threat existing, they will explode all over that bill and anyone who votes yes.
Posted by: I have a feeling | November 17, 2011, 3:02 am 3:02 am
?
Posted by: dave | November 17, 2011, 3:16 am 3:16 am
Now, I am in no way saying that I want this bill to pass, because it is going about it the wrong way. Not even sure there is a right way. However, I am against piracy. If something I made was getting passed around for free without my o.k. I would be pretty upset too. Yes, the movie makers do get a lot of money, but they spend a boat load making the movies too. The Immortals production budget alone was $75 million and after 2 weeks being in front they reach break even. It is only after the first few weeks that they really begin to make money and funny enough, that is when people usually forget about that movie and go on to the next big thing.
Anyways, as I said before, in the end while I don’t agree with piracy I also don’t agree with this particular act either. I just find it funny to call it unconstitutional to protect your property (although I do realize that the way this act works would be unconstitutional.)
Anyways I am sure I will get yelled at in the comments by someone who wants everything for free and I won’t be responding to them. So have a good one everyone. :D
Posted by: That Guy | November 17, 2011, 4:07 am 4:07 am
Fair Enough “That Guy,”
The problem though is that by no right should the government give the entertainment industry THAT much power to deal with piracy.
It’s using a bazooka to swat flies.
Posted by: Sean Liam Reilly | November 17, 2011, 4:23 am 4:23 am
@BRETT GLASS: You’re a moron. You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Plus, Google hasn’t always owned YT. As for Evangelist… We’ll see how you feel when you’re favorite religious sites are shut down. Be a parent, and learn to raise your kids.
Posted by: Benjamin | November 17, 2011, 6:12 am 6:12 am
Evangelist sounds like she wants to start burning books next. No mention of the trash that is available at the local supermarket, or on school playgrounds.
Posted by: raggmopp | November 17, 2011, 7:23 am 7:23 am
OK this is where i think there going about this all wrong!!!!!!! Personally everyone knows stealing is wrong. I mean you wouldn’t steal from ur families or best friends. So why steal at all. Ok I believe that i should buy the movies and music albums I download. And i have downloaded a lot over the years. When u r broke and want to watch a good movie or listen to that new Drake CD that came out u kno? But It is stealing. And i kno that! And sometimes it does get to me. Cause i kno people trying to make it in the music business. Ok so to get to my point. Attack the problem at the source! FILE FORMATS THAT ARE PROTECTED! (.avi .mp4 .mkv .DivX .flv) MAKE THE OLDER FORMATS ILLEGAL IF THERE NOT PROTECTED. Meaning if you own the CD or DVD and u want to put it to ur computer it will only allow u to use it for that computer. This should make downloading a difficult if the files can’t be play! And say the many media players like iTunes will only play Protected, Thats another way . And make the people who make the programs to convert them to files make it where it protects them so they can only be used for that computer and any ipod or players u want to put it own. Like when u download from iTunes. And then if they found a website hosting a program download that doesn’t add the protection or a media player that plays unprotected. Shut it down or watever you have to do. Thats wat i think they should do! Which in the long run i think my theory will lower the price to go the theaters to watch a new movie. Even tho in the long run the rich will get rich. Ok did anyone understand where i’m coming from??
Posted by: MA$0N | November 17, 2011, 7:24 am 7:24 am
Does anyone realize how terrifying it is that our major media outlets didn’t say anything about this? I mean literally you can google search “fox news sopa,” “NBC news sopa” and nothing will come up. I was surprised that an “ABC news sopa” brought me here. Even so, it was discussed by the house of representatives on 11/16 during the day, and ABC didn’t report on it until 6 in the evening, and this is little blurb is all we got.
Posted by: Andrew | November 17, 2011, 7:37 am 7:37 am
When it comes to love, age is nothing. So no matter how big the age difference. If you really love her, and also she has the same the feeling, everything goes easy. I met my older guy who is 25 years older than me at αgéMingle.Cóm and we enjoy this big age gap relationship. The big age gap love is really an extremely wonderful different romance.You may have a try. Good luck233990
Posted by: dfhwe | November 17, 2011, 7:45 am 7:45 am
I’m pretty sure this wasn’t Obama’s idea, if it was, most of the house would shoot it down right away, just like they’re shooting down his new jobs act, Hollywood probably has the Republicans in their pocket.
Posted by: A tribe called Guest | November 17, 2011, 7:46 am 7:46 am
More laws only to keep “honest” people honest ….
Posted by: yeah.i.said.it | November 17, 2011, 8:46 am 8:46 am
The problem with many Congressional bills is that they go overboard in order to kiss the feet of the Congressmen’s campaign-donor masters. For example, tort reform to reduce the insurance cost of doctors is a tremendously good idea. But the GOP’s bill said that if a doctor removes the wrong leg, then has to remove both of them, the max. restitution is $250,000! As if that’s going to take care of the damage done!
Posted by: The_Mick | November 17, 2011, 9:42 am 9:42 am
The big corporations are trying to keep this quiet as to sweep this under the rug so to speak. If one thinks the Occupy Wallstreet is something just wait until there is no more You Tube. I will be there. I am so sick and tired of losing my rights as a American every year. Hollywood is crying because they don’t make enough money. Hey Hollywood why don’t YOU make something good for a change? Todays music sucks also!!!!
Posted by: David B | November 17, 2011, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Even if they stop the piracy, it doesn’t follow that all of those who purchased pirated copies would purchase legal copies. It’s a price point issue. The items being pirated aren’t worth the price charged through legal channels to the people who purchase the pirated copies. Or – they may own a legal copy in another format and don’t want to pay full-price for a copy in a new format.
Posted by: wryview | November 17, 2011, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Let’s see, here. A bill that allows the government and Hollywood to shut down any website, regardless of its hosted location, if they detect so much as a few lyrics or a portion of copywrited material on said site. I saw this movie, and its results. Let’s see, 1984, V for Vendetta, and Equilibrium all come to mind. Using a cannon like this bill to kill a mosquito when Hollywood is still making money hand over fist is ridiculous, and will only serve to drive a bigger wedge between the American people and the government that is doing this.
Posted by: Outraged | November 17, 2011, 10:49 am 10:49 am
The Stop Online Piracy Act does nothing to betray US Internet Policy or Internet Freedom. SOPA isn’t going to hand the Chinese the moral high ground on Internet freedom. In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a letter stated in no uncertain terms: “There is no contradiction between intellectual property rights protection and enforcement and ensuring freedom of expression on the Internet.” Google is pursuing its own self-interest, not altruistically defending Internet freedoms, when it voices its opposition to the bill. It is perfectly fine, and part of the legislative process, for businesses with opposing interests to oppose bills and seek to amend them or introduce their own legislation. What’s not fine is for entities who oppose the bill to initiate scare campaigns that misstate and exaggerate the intentions behind the bill.
At the end of the day, if stakeholders have concerns about unintended consequences, they should come forward with constructive solutions for ensuring the bill language does what it’s intended to do, rather than running around trying to scare people. All U.S. rights holders are seeking is a legal process whereby they can gain effective remedies against entities who are stealing their work – particularly outside the reach of current US law, and ensure that legitimate third party intermediaries like ISPs, search engines, payment processors, and ad networks are not supporting the illegal activities being undertaken.
Posted by: Copyright Alliance | November 17, 2011, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I’m very curious. How much is the industry suffering exactly? Didn’t movies like Avatar make country-fixing amounts of money?
Posted by: Tulip | November 17, 2011, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Make no mistake: If this bill is passed, there will be a massive backlash from the people. This country was founded on the idea that laws should serve the people, not the other way around. When that is betrayed, a law is found unjust. It is unreasonable to push this bill, then, because we know, with great certainty, that the people do NOT want this.
Also, this IS a Republican bill. It was put forward by a Texas representative. I do not recall his name.
While I sincerely doubt that this bill will get voted in, it is important that we as a country let our government know that this is not acceptable, and we will not have it.
Posted by: Mike | November 17, 2011, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
What will happen if this gets implemented and thoroughly enforced :
Americans will buy VPN access to places abroad. It’s already a booming industry and easily accessible. Get an IP outside the US , connect to it through a vpn server which you access over a secure ssl connection.
I can list dozens of companies that sell this kind of product (I won’t , I don’t want this site to get banned because of me ROFL)
So , the workarounds to this bill already exist!
The effect for businesses : They will all relocate abroad , and the only booming business will be the VPN connections outside.
Next step , Ban outside VPN server ip’s one by one ? That’s on par with cutting all the cables that go out of or into the united states.
I for one am not worried about this bill . I am laughing my ass off looking at how american big industry are cutting the ground from under their feet. The little guy , in the end -taking a transitional periodinto account – has nothing to fear , every American has the right to set up shop everywhere .
More cynical , but not as down as everyone else I guess..
Posted by: Phoenixxl | November 17, 2011, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
I know piracy is illegal and all, but honestly, last time I checked, Hollywood isn’t hurting. They make multi billions of dollars per movie. How much has Harry Potter made alone? Billions. So some schmuck makes a dollar once in a while on a street corner. The government is going to censor and regulate the entire internet, just because hollywood is greedy? The government just wants to control our hard fought rights and freedoms, and hollywood wants even more money. It’s a match made in hell, and us normal folks are going to be punished for it. Typical.
Posted by: Liz | November 17, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
The congress wants to censor the internet with the same technology as China and Iran. Communism is slowly sliding in to American society. If it was only to stop piracy find, but since it will affect are freedom of speech, and choice by censoring what we post on social media websites, websites we create, and websites we like visiting. The Government is again trying to tell the American people what they can say and where they can go. This is especially concerning for those who are Christian and Jewish, because since this is done in China which is an anti-God communist nation and could very well attack sites that preach and teach the gospel. They have already been trying to remove God from this nation by censoring what written in the history books, whats taught in school and on television, and they could very well try to do it on the web but I pray it doesn’t happen.
Posted by: Blueking | November 17, 2011, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
This is laughable at best. This attempt to safeguard the internet will never work. Point one, most of the infringing sites that they claim are disrupting the internet, do not even operate inside of the US. Since this law cannot stop them from operating it becomes useless. Their second Idea to block DNS requests is also equally useless. Anyone who has studied computers knows that a website can be called up directly using their IPv6 address (128.78.001.9). The only thing this law will accomplish is to make the computer generation smarter in their attempts at accessing free information, and send more businesses like google and facebook to our overseas counterparts. Great work dad!
Posted by: one smart cookie | November 17, 2011, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
You people aren’t even seeing the big picture…. you’re standing too close to the window… step back a few paces… there you go. See? It’s not about the movies at all. It’s about controlling the last free source of information in the world. This is how they get their foot in the door legitimately to push through legislation to begin the procedures necessary to regulate our access to the internet completely. You don’t just shut down the whole thing downy, or the people will revolt. You do it in steps.
When I was young, we didn’t need to wear a seat belt, and we could ride a bike without a godd**ned helmet on. Not only could you smoke in a bar… hell, you could smoke in a McDonald’s. If we’d have lost all the freedoms they’ve taken away from us in my lifetime alone in one week, people would have lost their minds and taken back the country. But they did it slowly and here we are with the intended result. We’re like frogs in pots of water. Turn up the heat fast, and we jump…. but turn it up slowly, and we’ll sit there until we’re cooked. Trust me people, this is how they intend to turn on the oven. . . and I’ve seen it coming for years.
Posted by: Aveles | November 17, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
If people are selling copied material that is one thing. Naughty them. But if people are sharing the videos at no charge, that’s entirely different. After all, this is about money..and when there is no money involved….Besides, the actors and the producers all get their profits off the movies and video sales. They just want the gravy train to keep flowing after they have made their initial profit. And lets face it, downloaded and streamed movies don’t have the resolution as being in the theatre…and those movies will be in the 99cent bin at walmart in a year or 2 anyway.
Posted by: Wayne | November 17, 2011, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Do you think passing some stupid, flawed bill into law will stop piracy. You’re wrong. When they put the new twenty dollar bills into circulation they did it because it was said to be impossible to counterfeit. Well guess what, not a month after they did it, their were counterfeits all in circulation. My point: criminals will do what ever it is in their power to break the law REGARDLESS OF WHAT NEW LAWS THE GOVERNMENT PASSES. And yes, it may be true that Hollywood is taking a couple hits to the internet financially speaking, but come the frick on, like Hollywood and everyone in it’s circle isn’t rich e-fricking-nough already. What about the little people? What about the fact that the internet has become the beacon of truth for people like me? You want to censor it because some millionaire director doesn’t feel like he’s making enough. It’s selfish, and by all standards unconstitutional. The Government’s already done it’s damnedest to censor everything from movies, to tv, to books. Leave the internet alone. It’s the one place on earth where individualism and expression is still really allowed.
Posted by: Trish | November 17, 2011, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
our government is corrupt. It doesnt matter republican or democrat no body listens to “we the people“
Posted by: Sam | November 17, 2011, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
I watch movies that the library lones out, So Dummywood make nothing off of me…
Posted by: Walter | November 17, 2011, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
If you do not want your children seeing things on the internet, Parental COntrols are there to limit access. Pirating has been around for decades and will continue to be around – these bills will not stop someone with a smart phone from recording – yes the quality is getting that good. Digital cameras are small and easy to conceal. These bills are just another Republican intrusion in our daily lives – something they are very good at attempting to do. Of course creating jobs -FAR more important id NOT something they do well, so they just keep ignoring that stuff.
Posted by: pksk531 | November 18, 2011, 7:59 am 7:59 am
So you want us all to move over to the TOR network, ok. Then you will have no control of what we do.
Posted by: Sean | November 18, 2011, 9:23 am 9:23 am
You guys are all talking about big business…that’s not the whole story either. How many of you have reposted that cute pic of a kitten holding on to a stick titled “hang in there”? Or reposted yesterday’s cartoon strip in your blog, quoted a part of a news article, or a poem? That by law is a copyright violation. Posted a chance encounter with a sports star? That also could be covered in this Bill. All it would take is a pro photographer to be standing near you take a pic close to what you took, and claim copyright, as he is selling that close pic. The bill says all a copyright holder has to do is allege a violation and ISP’s must block and act. So you could find your blog or facebook page blocked because of some pic you may actually own, but someone else claims is theirs.
Posted by: Dan | November 18, 2011, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
I for one am among the 95% who think this is bull crap. Hollywood is still making massive amounts of money now adays, even if people are pirating videos. Just look at Avatar; it’s one of the highest ranking movies in the world for intake, and it was made within these past 3 years. Did people pirate it? Yes. Did it affect the money the companies made? No, it didn’t. Not as much as it could have.
My point? These companies are becoming whinier and whinier. Really, it’s sickening to see what greed has done to them. I mean, jeez, if you watch a TV movie you can still record it with a VHS and start selling the copies.
What comes next after this? No watching music videos on YouTube? Having to pay money to do a web search? Really, MPAA, get a life. This is the “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave” not “Land of everything must be bought and home of the Hitlers in the government”.
Man…. Felt good to get that off of my chest.
Posted by: NoName | November 18, 2011, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Ron Paul. Or loose all the rest of our freedoms.
Posted by: chuck | November 18, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I understand that sharing copyrighted material with other people is wrong and it shouldn’t happen, but you have several problems with this act:
Anyone with a little bit of computer knowledge can figure out how to bypass being detected by using foreign companies that provides VPN’s or Proxies service to customers, where the laws are relaxed in that country, or they can use someone’s unprotected network (if they don’t already know how to hack it). So in essence, with this act, you are making everyone with a wireless network responsible for managing their home network. This is not practical. Not everyone knows how to do this and even the best in the business can’t 100% secure their servers.
Secondly, the amount of money it would take to find the criminal, which would be more likely a kid would be in the millions. Who would be paying for all this to tell the kid to stop? We would of course!!!
Third, you would also have ISP’s having to ban their customers even though they have no idea whether the kid next door to their customers was responsible or not. Imagine how it would affect their business which would impact their employees, from potential layoffs, and investors. Granted my third example might be a stretch, but I only mention it because it could occur.
I think our tax paying dollars would be more useful going somewhere else. If the music, software, and movie industries have a problem with it let them deal with it as they have in the past. After all, its their copyrighted material they shouldn’t let the American people foot the bill on protecting their investments.
Posted by: Matt | November 18, 2011, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Go Anonymous!
Posted by: sugamama | November 19, 2011, 12:08 am 12:08 am
You are wrong. The bill says that you (or the offending website) will be informed to remove the content first, long before it goes to court. If you refuse to comply with removing content that YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS TO BE USING — that’s when your site will be blocked. I am 100% in favor of this bill — because I despise thieves!
>>>>You guys are all talking about big business…that’s not the whole story either. How many of you have reposted that cute pic of a kitten holding on to a stick titled “hang in there”? Or reposted yesterday’s cartoon strip in your blog, quoted a part of a news article, or a poem? That by law is a copyright violation. Posted a chance encounter with a sports star? That also could be covered in this Bill. All it would take is a pro photographer to be standing near you take a pic close to what you took, and claim copyright, as he is selling that close pic. The bill says all a copyright holder has to do is allege a violation and ISP’s must block and act. So you could find your blog or facebook page blocked because of some pic you may actually own, but someone else claims is theirs.]
Posted by: Proud Artist | November 19, 2011, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
This bill is an abomination, and a disgrace to the American public! Although I agree that piracy is a problem, even I know that the actions described in this bill will do absolutely NOTHING to truly combat piracy; all it does is block off certain websites that these companies FEEL are gateways for piracy, and in truth, the websites themselves are not the problem!
I am an artist who uploads my OWN work to the internet all the time! I understand the frustration that comes with some other idiot stealing my work and calling it their own: but I also know that it is NOT the fault of the OTHER USERS who want to upload their own work, and give artists like me a place to connect with people!
It’s the users who actually break the rules that are the blame, and quite frankly blocking websites that they happen to frequent will not help to combat the piracy:
It’s similar to having a class party and becasue one student decides to misbehave the entire class is punished-> THEN FURTHER the teacher takes advantage of the class not having a party to make them clean up their room.
Posted by: Anonymous | November 20, 2011, 1:11 am 1:11 am
if this is passed i feel bad for all those who invested in stocks such as google.
Posted by: joe | November 20, 2011, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
It never ceases to amaze me how stupid and greedy people are. Little do they realize they are not only screwing the American public over, as well as the rest of the world, but also themselves. Let them pass this bill and they’ll realize how stupid they are once they go broke.
Posted by: Ran | November 20, 2011, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
This bill goes way deeper then what is seen from the murky surface. True this bill is wrong on so many levels that any rational person would at the least be aware that our freedoms as Americans would be severely impacted. And that would be a negative in case common since didn’t let you know. Internet piracy is not the real problem. That is just a by product of a system that has been set up to work off of greed. Someone please tell me why they are surprised. They created the problem and are now punishing us for having fed off the BS. True this is just a small part of what SOPA is using as a leg to stand on but if we are to pick apart just one of the BS legs it stands on it does do some good. Bottom line is that big business once again is setting in motion or at least backing a government manipulated money making scam. I get it. You worked hard to produce a product and you would like to get paid for it. Guess what we as a people don’t see it that way. We are tired of paying for some BS that we so mind numbly give into. I will hold the artist accountable. Why? Because they have the voice the power to tell the entertainment industry no we make music for the people not for you not for your pocket book not for your big fancy house and 80,000 dollar car… Oh but wait I forgot lol They aren’t artist they are just puppets.
You know what on second thought maybe it should pass so that all the BS that we buy into, listen and fall head over heals for would disappear. Maybe this would re ignite our love for knowledge and depth of self instead of this crazy obsetion with “the star”.
Posted by: lw | November 21, 2011, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I’m so glad to see all these responses from people that recognize that this bill is fundamentally flawed-at best.
I encourage everyone to spread the word, and to send letters or phone calls to your lawmakers!
Posted by: Concerned Anon | November 24, 2011, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Tell everyone you know how horrible an idea SOPA is! and remember the power is in the PEOPLE of america. If congress passes this bill then be ready to fight it. Protest for your rights and don’t let them pass it. We can stop it, as long as were united. And as far as stopping piracy thats just plain BS, they just want to be able to upkeep the rich and excess lifestyle that they’ve grown accustomed to. Most americans dont make million and millions of dollars. These guys need a reality check. Why don’t you get used to making a normal salary like MOST OF AMERICA its not that bad. -~
Posted by: RichardRahl | November 26, 2011, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Screw this!!!!!! This is ridiculous!!! This stupid country is becoming more and more of A Communist state..
Hollywood is losing money???? Are we kidding?? These idiots make more money for one movie than all of us combined will ever make in our lifetimes. Seriously people complain!!! This is a complete BS!!
Posted by: Julianne | November 29, 2011, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This makes me sad, how slow it is taking people to realize all the rights that they have lost in the last ten years. This bill is only a drop in the bucket of all the civil liberties that have been taken away already in the interests of “National Security”. The terrorists won, truely.
Posted by: typhon | December 1, 2011, 11:51 am 11:51 am
This is just an excuse for the government to control what can and can’t be on the internet! If the congress feels what is said on a website, they can just take it away–umm, that’s unconstitutional, folks! This bill cannot be passed! Any government official who denies this being apart of the bill is just BSing everyone to get it passed.. It’s a shame what has become of out government..even in rights are offered to be given the option to take a site away or not, it’ll only be a cover-up to get people agrre with it. ..
Posted by: WTH?? | December 3, 2011, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
As much as I admittedly download music and the like, I must agree that it should be stopped. but not like this. Total violation of rights.
Posted by: Jon | December 4, 2011, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
And I love how in a research paper or anything of that type, simply citing a website or person is good enough to use their information as much as you want, as long as you aren’t using it for sale. Why can’t I just aknowledge in some way that I recognize who created the song without paying money?
Posted by: Jon | December 4, 2011, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
How come we don’t hear about this on the morning, afternoon and nightly news for weeks like we do about some of the other crap (Sanduski)(qute kittens) (hardship stories) (latest utube sensation) (celebraty marrages). Wake up america your screwed and so are our CHILDREN.Like our polatitions say “it’s all about the children”. On Thursday, December 1, the traitors in the Senate advanced the plot to destroy America by passing into law the controversial National Defense Authorization Act by a vote of 93-7. The Senate gave the U.S. military the dictatorial power to “to indefinitely detain an American citizen with no charge, no trial and no oversight whatsoever.”
The passage of the NDAA bill and similar legislation shows that the treacherous Senate wants most of the troops to leave Iraq and Afghanistan so they can be used to occupy America as it goes into an engineered economic collapse.
So move over Iraqis and Afghans, Americans will now replace you as the most deadly insurgents and terrorists on the planet. Sounds crazy? Well, America and the world is being held hostage by criminal banksters on Wall Street and psychopathic state terrorists in Washington
Posted by: mike | December 7, 2011, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Freedom, what’s that?….Do WE have it?….Uuuuh, no, but every other country with electricity does, I think…
LOL, AMERICA STILL SEES ITSELF AS A THREAT.
Posted by: Truth | December 8, 2011, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
The very idea of this bill is astounding. Aren’t there more pressing issues that require attention, rather than censoring the Internet and everything that is great about it? There is no way this will ever pass. It’s just not possible.
Posted by: Allison | December 14, 2011, 1:07 am 1:07 am
If this passes we will soon be like China. America is becoming more like a communist country everyday. I vote we stop it.
Posted by: Real | December 15, 2011, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Love her or hate, Lady GaGa said on british telly ‘like, how much money do they need?’ this coming from a relatively new artist who employs ALOT of people. They will not make any more money even if this bill succeeds – there are many films ive watched online that i would NEVER go see or rent. Greed….
Posted by: mrsmouthoff | December 30, 2011, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Stop paying actors so much. Now there’s a solution to studio revenue problems.
Posted by: sean | January 17, 2012, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Shut Em’ Down
The U.S. Congress is strictly a gathering of pervs, crooks and hired graftees. If the USA adopted a ONE-TERM policy for ALL of its legislators and judges most of these CONTROL issues would fade away and the world in general would see a rebirth of financial prosperity and creativity.
Posted by: dshanker soer | January 17, 2012, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Censuring the Internet is Tantamount to a Nazi Book Burning
I find it ironic that the disbarred Illinois lawyer/president and the lawyer wife of another disbarred /lawyer President….I find it ironic that these two lawyer politicians, who are increasingly unpopular with Citizens who “elected” them…. I find it ironic that these schmucks and their corporate masters are using their stooges in the Congress to severely censure the Internet.
In violation of the very Constitution that they swore to protect and defend.
Posted by: Tip Calaman | January 18, 2012, 1:58 am 1:58 am
everyone is missing the point. the responsibility over protecting movie from being copied is in the studios hands and only them. no one should be responsible for doing their job of protecting their privet products, especially not the goverment. its their movies, its their songs, why should anyone else need to watch over it? why should there be a law to protect them and do their job for them? if the studios cant protect their products good enaugh, its their problem, nobody elses. you cant blame anyone for copying a movie when they can, its only the studio’s fault for not protecting it enaugh, its nobody elses business. especially no business of the law.
Posted by: world turned upside down | January 18, 2012, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Trust me this came up before and it will pass again, they honestly have someone really stupid in the government to keep trying to make dumb ass bills like these. i promise the government will destroy themselves if they put more stupid laws up because that will make more criminals which causes conflict
Posted by: Jaraad | January 18, 2012, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I think it’s stupid. Maybe if movies were cheaper people wouldn’t have to pirate them. It’s ridiculous to have to pay 25 + just on a new release. What? Are all these directors and actors and all the others involved really going to make a scene? They have so much money, yet they’re still hungry for more. And closing down sites? Wow. I have to pay for internet, I refuse to also pay for access to websites, especially if they were free to begin with.
Posted by: Mariah | January 18, 2012, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
This is so stupid we are slowly turning into Communist and I guess Congress. Want kids to be stupid we use internet to buy stuff there goes our economy.
Posted by: Sebass | January 18, 2012, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
“America Land of the free” hahaha yeah right were right behind ya China here we come communism
Posted by: Sebba | January 18, 2012, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Obama and Cass Sunstein have been trying to censor the internet since taking office, but the left Wing Derps don;t care until it becomes about intellectual property and offers them an outlet to express their stupid “CORPORATIONS R CONTROLLIN TEH WORLDZ!!1111″ conspiracy theories.
Posted by: Marxist Hypocrisy 101 | January 19, 2012, 4:26 am 4:26 am
Why censor the guys pointing the finger of where to go. I underarmed about the revenue thing but censoring major search engines or websites that show where pricacy. Only why don’t we pay people to censor the site that lieutenant the things that hurt our revenue. One site that can be taking out is rarbg.com. say you take out Google then people go to blogs. Take blogs out then people will find another solution to get free crap. Why censor when you can regulate.
Posted by: Alex holmes | January 19, 2012, 11:32 am 11:32 am
The world is so corrupt. They hide everything from us innocent people. They make up lies like about the tragedy that happened with 911. The iraqs never did nothing to us. It was all set up. People are realizing. The government dosen’t want anyone to know information about the world anymore. Since the internet is so up to date. Everyone will soon realize how fudged up this government and world is.
Posted by: lizzie | January 20, 2012, 1:55 am 1:55 am
I’m amazed at how many people are opening there eyes to what the government is secretly doing, as more people wake up we might one day be able to say no to our governments.
WE DONT WANT A NEW WORLD ORDER, we want our countries back, im afraid the government will do something extreme though like release a virus or start a war with iran.
Posted by: mark | January 23, 2012, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm