By Calvin Lawrence Jr.

Jan 10, 2012 6:00am

‘Doomsday Clock’ a Minute Closer to the End

ap doomsday clock nt 120109 wblog Doomsday Clock a Minute Closer to the End

                                                                                Image Credit: Mary Altaffer/AP Photo

Not to be confused with biblical prophecy or the Mayan calendar, the so-called Doomsday Clock owes its existence to scientists and engineers, or at least those who’ve been affiliated with the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

The global security and public policy magazine has adjusted the minute hand on the clock 19 times since its inception in 1947, to “convey how close humanity is to catastrophic destruction.” It was closest, according to the bulletin timeline – at 2 minutes to midnight – in 1953, when the United States “tested its first thermonuclear device, obliterating a Pacific Ocean islet in the process; nine months later, the Soviets test an H-bomb of their own.”

Humanity was furthest away from doomsday, according to the bulletin – at 17 minutes to midnight – in 1991, after the Cold War officially ended. “The illusion that tens of thousands of nuclear weapons are a guarantor of national security has been stripped away,” the bulletin declared.

Bulletin authors today nudged the clock a minute closer to midnight (5 minutes to midnight), after moving it a little further from the end of humanity in 2010. “Two years ago, it appeared that world leaders might address the truly global threats that we face. In many cases, that trend has not continued or been reversed,” according to the bulletin website. “For that reason, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is moving the clock hand one minute closer to midnight, back to its time in 2007.”

Here’s a sampling of other predictions in the 65-year history of the Doomsday Clock.

It’s 7 minutes to midnight (1947): “As the Bulletin evolves from a newsletter into a magazine, the Clock appears on the cover for the first time. It symbolizes the urgency of the nuclear dangers that the magazine’s founders – and the broader scientific community – are trying to convey to the public and political leaders around the world.”

It’s 12 minutes to midnight (1963): “After a decade of almost non-stop nuclear tests, the United States and Soviet Union sign the Partial Test Ban Treaty, which ends all atmospheric nuclear testing. While it does not outlaw underground testing, the treaty represents progress in at least slowing the arms race.”

It’s 9 minutes to midnight (1974): “South Asia gets the Bomb, as India tests its first nuclear device. And any gains in previous arms control agreements seem like a mirage. The United States and Soviet Union appear to be modernizing their nuclear forces, not reducing them.”

It’s 3 minutes to midnight (1984): The United States and Soviet Union had drifted miles apart by then. “Every channel of communications has been constricted or shut down; every form of contact has been attenuated or cut off. And arms control negotiations have been reduced to a species of propaganda,” a concerned Bulletin informs readers.

It’s 5 minutes to midnight (2007):  “The world stands at the brink of a second nuclear age. The United States and Russia remain ready to stage a nuclear attack within minutes, North Korea conducts a nuclear test, and many in the international community worry that Iran plans to acquire the Bomb. Climate change also presents a dire challenge to humanity. Damage to ecosystems is already taking place; flooding, destructive storms, increased drought, and polar ice melt are causing loss of life and property.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

This whole clock thing has lost its relevance. It had a slight impact on the general public half century ago but it is very redundant and predicable right now. From now until time immemorial it seems it will always be a few minutes before midnight. Always.

Posted by: Geezer | January 10, 2012, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Stale political hackery — this “Doomsday Clock” has always ticked in accord with the arms control desires of the activist scientists rather than in accord with reality. Reality? The clock should have been 3 minute from midnight in 1979 under Jimmy Carter when according to Soviet archives they were at the closest point in their history to considering a first strike against the US, percieving Carter to so weak that a properly staged attack would be met with surrender by the US. In 1984 the clock was much further than 3 minutes since the Soviets *knew* that Reagan would retaliate in any scenario, and they moved first strike planning off the table. Now it’s a multipolar world with public, visible in our face proliferation from Iran, Venezuela, North Koresa…countries unmoved by any and all arems control appeals. So now these “scientists” are jumping onto the Climate Change bandwagon in an attempt to maintain relevance. Political hackery.

Posted by: John | January 10, 2012, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Adding Global Warming into the calculations is publicity seeking behavior. While Global Warming might become a problem in the future, it’s effects are pretty insignificant today. Despite all of the news stories trying to relate Hurricanes, tornadoes and (I kid you not) the Japanese Tsunami to Global Warming the current provable effects are minor.

Furthermore, the worst case scenario for Global Warming is far, far less of a threat to humanity than the very real potential detonation of 20,000 nuclear warheads in the 1970′s and 1980′s. The Clock Keepers are just looking for publicity by latching onto the latest public fear.

Posted by: JWatts | January 10, 2012, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Oh come on people. No one will say “here it is” or “there it is”. It happens when it happens. Period.

Posted by: dashdot | January 10, 2012, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

The clock’s setting seems to be based on how much are the civilized countries of the world willing to appease crazies with nuclear weapons.

Posted by: moderateGuy | January 10, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Ok.. if the “Mayans” and their calendar for doomsday is real…. how come they didn’t predict the death of their own kind?

Posted by: Michael | January 10, 2012, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Shouldn’t it be adjusted to 4 minutes to midnight because of the mistake made with Obama?

Posted by: chrisc | January 10, 2012, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Okay, two non-relevant items here, ABC News, REALLY! and the Doomsday Clock, both have totally lost their relevance in today’s world!!

With Obama and what is happening under his so called watch, it should be at about 2 minutes after midnight. Sick and tired of the liberal activists all telling me how tought things are for them, when they are some of the leading drivers of the problems!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Chris | January 10, 2012, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

2012 is shaping up. Overpopulation on the coasts with too many drivers clogging our freeways, spewing all that smog, and resulting in screwed up weather. Imagine our world in California if we don’t get any water or snow this year. Add in H5N1 a manmade deadly virus and we are in for a real ride where we could lose a large number of the planet. We have a lot of changes we have to put in place. Overpopulation by third world countries has to stop.

Posted by: Angelgroove | January 10, 2012, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

5 minutes to midnight? Well, when Spring rolls around and we hit Daylight Savings, it appears humanity is boned.

Posted by: JSchuler | January 11, 2012, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Only 5 minutes? These “sientists” are ridiculous. There was a 6 reactor meltdown of high powered nuclear plant in FUKUSHIMA. Easily the worst catastrophe in modern history. Worse than if 6 nukes had been detonated, as these plants have continued to remelt after criticality and have now reached CHINA SYNDROME. FOR NEARLY AN ENTIRE YEAR, THE WHOLE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE AND OCEANS HAVE BEEN POLLUTED WITH THE MOST TOXIC METAL KNOWN TO EARTH- plutonium. AND ITS ONGOING.
That these paid-for fools have not recognized the continuing danger and (40yr min to shut off the radioactive flows) disaster proves why they should be ignored as just another de facto establishment propaganda coverup.
Send them all to DIAICHI, DIAINI and the beaches of Fukushima and let them stay there. What rubbish.

Posted by: Vitamin Plutonium | January 13, 2012, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.