The Presidential Planner: Obama Takes His Jobs Pitch to Ohio

ABCNEWS.com
President Obama will continue selling his $447 billion jobs bill to the American people today with a visit to Columbus, Ohio, where he will highlight his proposals to rebuild and modernize schools.
The president’s trip to House Speaker John Boehner’s home state carries political implications as well. Today’s visit to the swing state comes four days after Obama visited House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s district in Richmond, Va.
“You’re absolutely right. It is a campaign. The president is campaigning for growth and jobs,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney told reporters Monday. “And he’s campaigning to have the American Jobs Act passed.”
The president heads to the battleground state of North Carolina Wednesday to pitch his jobs plan in Raleigh-Durham.
In Columbus, Obama will tour the Fort Hayes Arts and Academic High School, where he will emphasize his proposal to invest $25 billion in school infrastructure to modernize at least 35,000 public schools.
“This money would fund a range of critical repairs and needed renovation projects that would put hundreds of thousands of Americans — construction workers, engineers, maintenance staff, boiler repair and electrical workers — back to work,” according to the White House.
The president’s plan also includes an additional $5 billion investment in modernizing community colleges.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Just another Obama militant attempt to force this bill down people throats, so he can continue paying off his partners in corruption…
OBAMA____VS_____AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | September 13, 2011, 9:11 am 9:11 am
While the White House and Congressional Democrats feign surprise at the collapse of what was described as “the most hyped startup in the crowded Solar Energy field,” it appears Obama Administration representatives were either easily duped or willingly blind to the facts. ABC News reports that Department of Energy officials have been regularly attending Solyndra board meetings for months as the company “careened towards bankruptcy” after blowing through the more than half a billion taxpayer dollars
CORRUPTION AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS
Posted by: Yep I said that | September 13, 2011, 9:14 am 9:14 am
“This money would fund a range of critical repairs and needed renovation projects that would put hundreds of thousands of Americans — construction workers, engineers, maintenance staff, boiler repair and electrical workers — back to work,” according to the White House.
The above White House statement is a clear indication of just how dysfunctional the federal government has become.
When you have to borrow money you don’t have to spend it on maintenance that should be an ongoing concern and already paid for, you are in deep deep trouble.
Posted by: Noz | September 13, 2011, 9:52 am 9:52 am
“Despite deepening doubts about President Obama’s economic agenda, Americans generally prefer the proposals he offered last week for reviving the economy to the competing ideas advanced by congressional Republicans and the GOP’s 2012 presidential field, a United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll has found.”
But….”Cantor: Republicans are not interested Obama jobs plan…”
Why?… GOP aide: ““Obama is on the ropes; why do we appear ready to hand him a win?”
Posted by: Kimberly | September 13, 2011, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Just remember, “Congress” embraces the current democrat controlled Senate as well.
Did the democrats and Pres Barry search for common ground when ramming through stimulus I and national socialized health care insurance (Obamacare)?
Posted by: bl | September 13, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Why?… GOP aide: ““Obama is on the ropes; why do we appear ready to hand him a win?”
Obama will simply hand the win to the GOP like he did on December 17th, 2010.
The package, brokered by Obama and Republican leaders in the wake of the November elections, angered many Democrats, who have long argued that the Bush tax cuts were skewed to benefit the wealthy. But their last-minute campaign to scale back the bill’s benefits for taxpayers at the highest income levels failed, and the House passed the measure 277 to 148 Thursday night, with 112 Democrats and 36 Republicans voting “no.”
Democrats should get used to being angered…
Posted by: Junior Varsity | September 13, 2011, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Again, Americans generally prefer Obama’s proposals for reviving the economy to the ideas put out there by the hugely unpopular congressional Republicans and the GOP’s current presidential field. See the United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll.
Let’s just get real. The economy is in dire shape and Obama’s proposal of all those out there is the one that has the best chance of creating jobs in the immediate future. It’s also the one Americans prefer. The standard GOP plans are much like Romney’s and the GOP has tried to pass them before, or has said they’re trying to pass them but doesn’t or when they pass some of them it’s been to poor effect.
One proposal– instantly capping government spending at 20 percent of GDP—would actually cause hurt to the immediate short-term employment picture.
Perry doesn’t really have a plan beyond tort reform and low taxes and the Texas Miracle, but as Romney has wisely pointed out, Perry was dealt aces and had little to do with the Texas Miracle which isn’t directly transferrable to the country as a whole. Basically, Texas has taken jobs from other states, not created much in the way of new jobs that pay at least a living wage.
Obama’s plan is reasonable: reasonably targeted and focused, reasonably designed, reasonably evidence-based versus ideologically-based and unproven, reasonably specific and reasonably front-loaded. Do I wish the first stimulus has been more targeted and focused? Yes, but I don’t see much of merit in the GOP plans and I don’t think scorched earth, uncertainty, partisanship and cynicism is doing all that much for us.
Posted by: Kimberly | September 13, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
And again we are experiencing Recovery Summer. Really, we are.
Posted by: Timmy | September 13, 2011, 10:24 am 10:24 am
This bill does nothing to address jobs leaving the country see G.E..
Does not go after unfair trade practices, foreign countries do not all place
environmental regulations and minimum wage clauses for workers.
This bill is just another BAILOUT for unions who through their dues process will
funnel money back to Obama campaign coffers. When the money to this bill runs
out, the bleeding will continue and for the second strait year social security is underfunded By the Obama Administration.
Posted by: deadwrestler | September 13, 2011, 10:29 am 10:29 am
This bill does nothing to address jobs leaving the country see G.E..
Does not go after unfair trade practices, foreign countries do not all place
environmental regulations and minimum wage clauses for workers.
This bill is just another BAILOUT for unions who through their dues process will
funnel money back to Obama campaign coffers. When the money to this bill runs
out, the bleeding will continue and for the second strait year social security is underfunded By the Obama Administration.
——————————-
But look how close we got to almost having having solar power with a $535 million loan to a company that is part of a billionaire’s business interestst! We were so close. Maybe next time…
Posted by: SPF | September 13, 2011, 10:37 am 10:37 am
AT USA Today:
Census bureau: U.S. poverty rises to 15.1%, highest since 1983
Why are we worse off than during the horrid years of Ronald?
Posted by: Jimmy C. | September 13, 2011, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Create jobs without spending a dime:
1. Stop using the Lacy Act to cripple businesses for no apparent reason -other than they gave a donation to your political opponents.
2. Call off the NLRB when they want to shut down a factory just because the labor isn’t unionized.
3. Approve the pending oil-drilling permits for ther Gulf of Mexico.
But no, we have to spend another half-trillion dollars instead. Government gets bigger and the private sector gets smaller. That’s the Obama way.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“One proposal– instantly capping government spending at 20 percent of GDP—would actually cause hurt to the immediate short-term employment picture.”
Posted by: Kimberly | September 13, 2011, 10:21 am 10:21 am
You’re unemployed and you seem to be doing just fine.
Posted by: Chuck | September 13, 2011, 10:51 am 10:51 am
“I was tentatively in favor of the jobs plan that Obama proposed last week. But that’s before I realized that he has no intention of trying to get it passed. . . . I really wish that Obama hadn’t wasted my Thursday evening, and that of 31 million other Americans, listening to a jobs plan that was only designed to produce one job–a second term for Barack Obama.” – M McCardle
Posted by: foggy | September 13, 2011, 10:57 am 10:57 am
I once again point out that if a employer gives a permanent raise for a one time tax
credit, shake the man’s hand, wish him well because he will be out of business
soon.
Posted by: deadwrestler | September 13, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am
(Reuters) – President Barack Obama faces deep skepticism from swing voters who see the Republican party as more in tune with their concerns about government spending, according to a poll released on Tuesday.
OBAMA________VS______AMERICA
Posted by: Yep I said that | September 13, 2011, 11:04 am 11:04 am
The sooner they pass the bill, the sooner he will have to stop all his flying around the country on the pretense of selling this bill. Cutting credits to oil companies will make our gas prices go up, because they will just pass the cost along to the consumer. Cutting the credits for charitable donations will make the wealthy cut out some of the donations, which in the long run will hurt the people who need it the most. Doesn’t that go against the point of the bill? Raxing the jet set corporations is hypocritical as all get out. Remember how he dressed down the auto industry for flying in on their jets when they asked for bailouts? Isn’t that what he is doing? He is flying around the country asking for a bailout. Using our corporate jet. Of course his is really campaigning on our dime so pass the bill and let’s see if he has to change his travel plans.
Posted by: Rafe | September 13, 2011, 11:40 am 11:40 am
So let me get this straight, you want to increase taxes on those who provide jobs to pay for a “jobs” program???? Just another DUH moment in this White House Administration….BTW, it cost an employer $3.00 per productive hour, times 2080 hours a year, in social security, medicare and unemployment insurance this does not include vacas…sick time…holidays…training…hiring costs…management costs…………SO $4,000. tax write off for hiring unemployed ain’t gonna cut it…especially when you plan to add to that expense by increased taxes……sheezzee….2012 can’t come soon enough….
Posted by: Parallex View | September 13, 2011, 11:54 am 11:54 am
“Doesn’t that go against the point of the bill?” -Rafe
Was it the point of the Troubled Asset Relief Program to give relief for those with troubled assets, or was it to facililtate the takeover of GM by their own workers’ union at the expense of the bond holders?
Was it the point of the ‘Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ‘ to protect patients and make healthcare affordable, or for the entire healthcare industry to become just another branch of the government?
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
So let me get this straight, you want to increase taxes on those who provide jobs to pay for a “jobs” program????
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
If they provide jobs the big question is: Where are they?
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
JUNIOR VARSITY: “But their last-minute campaign to scale back the bill’s benefits for taxpayers at the highest income levels failed . . . Democrats should get used to being angered.”
It’s great watching Democrats get angry about their inability to spend other people’s money to the detriment of the economy. They are shameless!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 13, 2011, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
PARALLEX VIEW: “So let me get this straight, you want to increase taxes on those who provide jobs to pay for a “jobs” program????”
SKIP: “If they provide jobs the big question is: Where are they?”
Look around, they are everywhere. 80% of the country is still employed. If you get government out of the way, we’ll have even more.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 13, 2011, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
If you get government out of the way, we’ll have even more.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As usual there is not one shred of evidence to back up this claim.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“If they provide jobs the big question is: Where are they?”
—————–
We’re working on it. We just need another $535 million. Then success!
Posted by: C. Heston | September 13, 2011, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Poverty rate soars, Congressional Budget Office says unemployment will stay right around 9% through 2012, More Violence in Afghanistan as American embassy under fire, 77 Military personal wounded over weekend in truck bomb attack. A president
that offers temporary tax credits asking employers to give permanent raises. Asking congress to pass a bill that robs money to fund Social security. Seniors you know what that means for you another year no COLA. I guess his redistribution of wealth plan is working perfectly. Cannot wait for Obamacare to finish us off!
Posted by: deadwrestler | September 13, 2011, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
–As usual there is not one shred of evidence to back up this claim.–
True. We had another awesome recovery summer. Just read Tim Geithner’s column. Anyway, how’s your trade-in working out?
Posted by: Volt | September 13, 2011, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
We’re working on it.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Which is alot more than can be said of the Republicans.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
SKIP: “As usual there is not one shred of evidence to back up this claim.”
There’s no evidence of 80% of the country being employed? You are just being childish, now.
Again, if you get government out of the way, we’ll have even more.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 13, 2011, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Which is alot more than can be said of the Republicans.
——————
Awesome. I’ll take that $535 million. Cash please and hurry like you guys did last time. It is sunny today! And tell Rep. Waxman I said hi!
Posted by: C. Heston | September 13, 2011, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I think it’s obvious who’s being childish.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
SKIP: “I think it’s obvious who’s being childish.”
Yes, you banging on about no evidence, as you ignore the evidence I present, sure is.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 13, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
If you get government out of the way, we’ll have even more. -Anonymous
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As usual there is not one shred of evidence to back up this claim. -SKIP
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
US vs Boeing:
Boing builds a plant to augment its production capabilities, but the NLRB shuts it down on the accusation that the new employees aren’t unionized and will therefore take jobs away from the other union workers Boeing already employs.
US vs Gibson Guitar:
The Justice Department selectively enforces the Lacy Act against a guitar manufacturer claiming the company illegally imported wood from India in violation of Indian Law. Agents tell the company that if they’d just imported completed guitars from India they’d be legal. In other words, if Gibson ships jobs overseas, they’ll have no legal troubles.
US versus big oil:
Drilling permits for the Gulf of Mexico sit on the desk of the Secretary of the Interior while oil drilling platforms are moved to other areas outside the authority of the US government. Personnel who supported the platforms in Louisiana get pink slips.
Those are the recent big ones just off the top of my head. Not listed are all the minute regulations that every private-industry company has to meet in order to do business. Government regulation isn’t one single ‘thing’ that can be refined by a single executive order or resolution, they’re a tangled web of ordinances and policies enacted by people who aren’t even elected and it’s no wonder that many small businesses (if you haven’t seen borded up shops then you don’t live near me) throw in the towel.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“I think it’s obvious who’s being childish.”
I couldn’t agree more. If only the loan had been for say $750 million. Then we never would have had a problem…
Posted by: C. Heston | September 13, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The Europeans have embraced cutting spending and austerity, and they’re approaching another economic crisis. Just watch Spain and Italy. We have to stop the hollow right-wing ideologues from foisting the same disaster on this country.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The Europeans have embraced cutting spending and austerity, and they’re approaching another economic crisis.”
And the disaster continues:
“German unemployment fell in August for a 26th straight month as hiring in Europe’s biggest economy held up in the face of a global market rout and the euro-area’s debt crisis.
The number of people out of work fell a seasonally adjusted 8,000 to 2.95 million, the Nuremberg-based Federal Labor Agency said today. Economists forecast a drop of 10,000, according to the median of 31 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. The jobless rate held at 7 percent, the lowest since records for a reunified Germany began in 1991.”
PS, I’d sell your Euros…
Posted by: Fritz | September 13, 2011, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Those are the recent big ones just off the top of my head.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
“Big ones”?? The number of jobs gained there would fall way short of making up for all the losses by laying off or terminating thousands of government workers under the guise of shrinking government.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
And the disaster continues:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Germany’s growth last quarter was down below 1%, which is making investors very nervous, and for good reason.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“Big ones”?? The number of jobs gained there would fall way short of making up for all the losses by laying off or terminating thousands of government workers under the guise of shrinking government.
$535 million would have paid quite a few people. Then again, it made George Kaiser laugh.
Posted by: C. Heston | September 13, 2011, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
as you ignore the evidence I present
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I have yet to see any evidence.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“Germany’s growth last quarter was down below 1%, which is making investors very nervous, and for good reason.”
I’m just so very nervous…As I said, the disaster continues…
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW) aims to hire 800 people at its factory in Leipzig, as part of a 400 million-euro ($577 million) expansion for the production of the i3 electric city car and the i8 hybrid super car. Porsche AG is recruiting more than 1,000 workers for its nearby plant, where it plans to add the new Cajun compact sport-utility vehicle.
The labor agency’s BA-X indicator, a measure for labor demand in Germany, jumped five points in August to a record 170, the agency said yesterday. Demand continued to rise from an already high level, “unfazed by the turbulences in stock markets and mooted business expectations,” the agency said.
—-
Oh, the worries I have….
Posted by: Fritz | September 13, 2011, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Meanwhile Republicans are getting nervous that they won’t get away with dawdling around doing absolutely nothing till 2012.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
“Big ones”?? The number of jobs gained there would fall way short of making up for all the losses by laying off or terminating thousands of government workers under the guise of shrinking government. -SKIP
================================================
And thus we come to the crux of the liberal view of employment. Taxes are required to provide for Government jobs. I’ll let you in on a little secret; Government doesn’t produce a thing worth buying. They take money from those who DO produce things worth buying and then, after taking their cut, give it to someone else like they’re the generous ones.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
“Meanwhile Republicans are getting nervous that they won’t get away with dawdling around doing absolutely nothing till 2012.”
From the NYT:
Democrats are expressing growing alarm about President Obama’s re-election prospects and, in interviews, are openly acknowledging anxiety about the White House’s ability to strengthen the president’s standing over the next 14 months.
Posted by: C. Heston | September 13, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Government doesn’t produce a thing worth buying
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Government provides valuable services which can’t be provided efficiently by the private sector.
Posted by: SKIP | September 13, 2011, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
“Government provides valuable services which can’t be provided efficiently by the private sector”
Like schools.
Posted by: Sidwell | September 13, 2011, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Jobs will have to be his big push if he wants a shot at 2012… Who do you think is the best option so far for the GOP. After the debate last night Romney did seem to come out on top but does that necessarily give him the momentum?
Posted by: Alex_Votocracy | September 13, 2011, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
I’ll let you in on a little secret; Government doesn’t produce a thing worth buying.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Schools, roadways, bridges, airports, educated adults, microchips, the internet, dams, the power grid, and on and on . . .
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Schools, roadways, bridges, airports, educated adults, microchips, the internet, dams, the power grid, and on and on . . .”
Canadian buses, private schooling, and green energy. Case closed!
Posted by: Fremont | September 13, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Schools, roadways, bridges, airports, educated adults, microchips, the internet, dams, the power grid, and on and on . . .”
Canadian buses, private schooling, and green energy. Case closed!
Posted by: Fremont | September 13, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Huh? Please try to make sense not just post catch phrases.
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
green energy. Case closed!
Posted by: Fremont | September 13, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Tuesday, 06 September 2011 09:00
A new report shows that the U.S. is central to the global solar supply chain. In 2010, U.S. solar firms achieved a positive trade flow of $1.9 billion globally according to SEIA and GTM Research’s U.S. Solar Energy Trade Assessment 2011. Photovoltaic (PV) components accounted for more than 99 percent of the year’s exports, with solar heating and cooling (SHC) claiming the remainder of the positive balance.
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Schools
Obama sends his kids to private school, shouldn’t we all?
Roadways:
Construction is contracted out to private companies.
Bridges:
Construction is contracted out to private companies.
Airports:
Construction is contracted out to private companies.
Educated adults:
Detroit is a city that Democrats have run for as long as anyone can remember, and half of adults there are illiterate -products of the public education system. The President of the Detroit school board had to file a lawsuit against his alma mater to get his degree because he kept failing the mandatory written exam.
Microchips:
The government makes microchips? Where can I buy my U.S. department of whatever microchip?
The internet:
Who’s YOUR internet provider? Mine’s a private company.
Dams:
Notice I said ‘nothing worth buying’? If someone offers to sell you a dam, well, don’t buy it.
The power grid:
My electricity is provided by a private company.
and on and on . . .
Keep trying.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
“Schools, roadways, bridges, airports, educated adults, microchips, the internet, dams, the power grid, and on and on . . .”
All of those things are worth buying, and we bought them collectively through our government.
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“A new report shows that the U.S. is central to the global solar supply chain. In 2010, U.S. solar firms achieved a positive trade flow of $1.9 billion globally according to SEIA and GTM Research’s U.S. Solar Energy Trade Assessment 2011. Photovoltaic (PV) components accounted for more than 99 percent of the year’s exports, with solar heating and cooling (SHC) claiming the remainder of the positive balance.”
Guess who sponsors GTM? A company that is involved with Evergreen Solar.
Evergreen Solar Inc. (ESLR), a maker of electricity generating solar panels, filed bankruptcy with plans to sell itself at an auction in order to pay creditors owed $485.6 million.
Investors who hold more than 70 percent of the company’s convertible senior secured notes have agreed to act as the so- called stalking-horse, or initial bidder, in a proposed auction for Evergreen’s assets, including new technology to make solar wafers at lower cost, Evergreen Chief Executive Officer Michael El-Hillow said in court papers today.
—
Weird stuff…
Posted by: Fremont | September 13, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“All of those things are worth buying, and we bought them collectively through our government.”
Why wouldn’t Obama buy public school for his children? I mean, why would he want to be like Bush? But I do have a bridge for sale….
Posted by: Bronx | September 13, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Why wouldn’t Obama buy public school for his children?
Posted by: Bronx | September 13, 2011, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Security reasons.
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“Security reasons.”
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Obama’s daughters are accompanied by Secret Service agents. Try again.
Posted by: Chuck | September 13, 2011, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Why wouldn’t Obama buy public school for his children? -Bronx
Security reasons. -Tara
Q: Why did Michelle Obama shut down a whole beach in Spain so she could work on her tan?
A: Security reasons.
Q: Why did Michelle and Barack take separate airliners to Martha’s Vineyard?
A: Security reasons.
Q: Why does Obama need a 40 SUV convoy to get from one end of Martha’s Vineyard to the other?
A: Security reasons.
Q: Where is the President’s illegal-immigrant uncle, Onyango Obama?
A: That’s classified. Security reasons.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
But Obama was all about CHANGE, remember? He claims to LOVE public schools and regularly parades around public school teachers for PR purposes, yet he sends his own daughters to very expensive elite private schools. Your security requirement excuse is lame and hypocritical. The Secret Service is fully capable of providing more than adequate protection for the First Daughters. Lethal protection, in fact. They carry guns, remember?
Posted by: Chuck | September 13, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
The Secret Service is fully capable of providing more than adequate protection for the First Daughters. Lethal protection, in fact. They carry guns, remember?
Posted by: Chuck | September 13, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
You’re being a bit foolish to think it’s just a matter of a few people carrying guns. Security of place is just as crucial. Sidwell was chosen for those very reasons.
“The quality of the school and its extra security make Sidwell Friends a good choice”, said Letitia Baldrige, who was Jackie Kennedy’s social secretary and chief of staff during the Kennedy administration.
Sidwell already has previous experience protecting the children of a President. Chelsea Clinton attended the same school.
You may think it’s a joke or an easy task protecting the President and his family, but it isn’t.
Posted by: Tara | September 13, 2011, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“You may think it’s a joke or an easy task protecting the President and his family, but it isn’t.” -Tara
Is it a joke when your average joe has to hope his kid wins a lottery so they can get into a ‘magnet school’ so his kid has a chance they’re literate when/if they graduate? This was a chance for Obama, who got tons of money from the teachers unions to put his money where his mouth was during the election and put his own kids in the same schools most people -especailly if you live in the inner city where his staunchest supporters live -have to send their kids. He took a pass on that and should be skewered on blogs like this for doing so.
‘Hope & Change’ became ‘Sucks to be You’.
Posted by: Larry | September 13, 2011, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm