Bachmann ‘Out of Money and Ideas’ in Iowa, Says Former Campaign Manager
Michele Bachmann has “run out of money and ideas” and can no longer expect to win in Iowa, her former campaign manager told ABC News on Monday.
Ed Rollins, who left the campaign in September, said the Minnesota congresswoman had backed off earlier comments by her campaign that Iowa was a “must-win” state because she lacked the finances, campaign structure, and ideas to win the first-in-the-nation caucus state.
“She’s still saying the same things she said in the first the debate. There’s no substance. She says, ‘I’m going to repeal Obamacare.’ But she’s been saying that from Day 1. I told her: That’s your Tea Party speech, now you have to say what you’re going to do next.”
In an interview Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Bachmann refused to say whether Iowa was a “must win” state as her current campaign manager, Keith Nahigian, had said. Nahigian took over after Rollins left.
“Of course, we’re focused on Iowa. We’re focused on the schedule and the primary process. Iowa is the first caucus. Then on to New Hampshire. And after that, the first in the South, which will be South Carolina. So we’re focused on the schedule that the states are now agreeing on, and that’s our order,” Bachmann said.
“But is it a must-win for you,” anchor Christiane Amanpour asked.
“Well, we’re focused on it as we are all on the states,” Bachmann responded.
That’s a less full-throated commitment than Nahigian made last month.
“She has to win Iowa and move on from there,” Nahigian said in a web video in September that featured a graphic calling Iowa a “must win state.”
Bachmann has seen her poll numbers plummet since she won the Ames, Iowa straw poll in August. In a recent Des Moines Register poll, the Minnesota congresswoman was polling in fourth place.
Rollins said he left the campaign because he didn’t want to spend an Iowa winter “fighting with a candidate who wouldn’t listen and had no money.” The campaign should focus solely on Iowa, he told her, but he says she wanted to campaign early on in New Hampshire, Florida and South Carolina.
There’s been no love lost between Rollins and Bachmann in the weeks since he left the campaign. They’ve traded barbs in the media. Bachmann recently joked that she wished she had Googled Rollins before hiring him.
But Rollins, who took former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee to victory in Iowa in 2008, said Bachmann approached him three four times for the job.
Bachmann today took new steps to strengthen her ground game in Iowa, announcing the names of 64 “grassroots activists” who will be working the state’s southeast.
“The caucuses are won precinct-by-precinct, with neighbors talking to neighbors, friends talking to friends. These supporters, like others around the state, are already working hard on Michele Bachmann’s behalf to bring home a victory,” said state Sen. Kent Sorenson, Bachmann’s state chairman, in a statement released by the campaign. “Southeast Iowa proved to be an important region in the 2008 caucuses and the same will be true in 2012.”
The Bachmann campaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Rollins’ remarks.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
I would say its time to say goodnight to this one. If you can’t raise the money… Her ex-staffers are brutally coming after her… and her interview on “This Week” yesterday was horrific.
Posted by: MyTakeOnThis61 | October 31, 2011, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
If she wants a new idea, she can always go after Cain for the recent allegations of sexual harassment. She doesn’t have anything to offer, so she could go negative. She’s a woman, so that gives her an inside track there. Maybe in exchange for the promise of consideration for a VP ticket from Perry?
Posted by: Aaftab | October 31, 2011, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
When did she have any ideas?
Posted by: robin | October 31, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Stick a fork in her..she’s done. I’d really like to start hearing something other than the “I Hate Obama” rhetoric from the GOP and something resembling a cohesive vision and plan that is designed to improve the lot for ALL Americans. But I don’t see that happening as long as the GOP candidates insist on aligning themselves with the religious right in order to claim “conservative” credentials.
Posted by: Zorro | October 31, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Oh! I thought she is a Tea Party candidate? I guess the “movement” is running out of steam.
Posted by: MG | October 31, 2011, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | October 31, 2011, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
I’ll miss her. I’ve had more laughs! ………….and Marcus……..ooh, Marcus. Now that she’s been trotted all over the country, Mr. Marcus will never get another whiff of that stuff, if he ever did.
Posted by: Mingo | October 31, 2011, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Being an utterly self deluded narcissist is a lousy campaign strategy.
Bachmann put the “N” in narcissism. Heartless drone of the extreme right. Willing to throw people out in the cold and destroy the earth. Yeah. That’s the one I want in the White House.
Posted by: anonymous | October 31, 2011, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Ring…ring….
Who’s there?
Reality!
Real-it-Tea Time to give it up.
Posted by: Oking | October 31, 2011, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I think all of the ones that left and are spreading the false info are RATS!!!!!! You RATS should be ashamed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: dot | October 31, 2011, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Bachman doesn’t have a chance!! But she gives the comedians great lines!!
Posted by: Clayton-Ted | October 31, 2011, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
RON PAUL is the ONLY viable candidate.
Posted by: magoomba | October 31, 2011, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
She never was as entertaining as that other narcissist, Sarah Palin. Her husband is more entertaining, but not in the public as much as I would like. He puts the hate in self-hating closet case. She is terrified of homosexuals the way I am of spiders, but she is married to one. Believe me, my gaydar is pretty good. I have always been able to find my brethren in a crowd.
Posted by: Robert Moore | October 31, 2011, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Rollins took $99K from MB and did very little for her. He repays her with a stab in the back, just so he can lick the boots of the Team Obama media.
Posted by: Derek Wain | October 31, 2011, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
You mean her husband hasn’t told her what to say
Posted by: Rich H. | October 31, 2011, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Gee, Ed. I may even agree with you on the substance of your comments, but don’t you think it is exceedingly tacky to may these statements after representing her and taking money as a part of her campaign team?
Posted by: prosecutor | October 31, 2011, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Ms Bachman has moved women’s rights to the forefront of equality.. She has proven that some women candidates have earned the right to be a stupid as some of the male candidates
Posted by: Grace | October 31, 2011, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I don’t think she had an idea in her head to begin with. She is seriously off her rocker
Posted by: arg | November 1, 2011, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Prosecutor, the only loyalty that an employer and an employee have between them is this one: “You work and I’ll pay you.” There is nothing after that. Rollins owes her nothing.
Posted by: puppyfeet217 | November 1, 2011, 1:53 am 1:53 am
The best evidence that Bachmann does not have presidential-level decision-making skills is that she hired Ed Rollins as a campaign manager. This guy had a clearly established reputation of being a a suck-up to the MSM/Democrat establishment; disloyal to his own candidate. A snake is a snake, and it’s amazing that Bachmann could not see that.
Posted by: Brian | November 1, 2011, 4:59 am 4:59 am
Another one bites the dust. Now if only the people of her district would wise up and send her packing next year when she is up for re-election in the House……
Posted by: Searambler | November 1, 2011, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Ed Rollins has a habit of stabbing former employers in the back. I am amazed that anyone trusts him to run anything given his absolute lack of loyalty.
Posted by: jaybo | November 1, 2011, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I guess you need to put forward a policy that has a hell of chance to make it law. That is why managers are worthless. Bachmann needs to push her jobs plan which gets us back on an economic recovery instead of playing to these rediculous tax reforms. Do not get me wrong. I like Cain, but his 9-9-9 plan does not address the problems.
Posted by: john e | November 1, 2011, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
I c a lot of you do not have a clue about Bachmann. Do more research before you spout your B.S.
Posted by: John e | November 1, 2011, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Oh John E boy…we have more than a clue about Bachmann, we live in her state, have seen her accomplish nothing and know the hate that she stands for. I will be sad when she is gone as she was a great source of entertainment! No one, and I mean no one bungles quite as well as Big Hair, Bad Makeup Bachmann.
Posted by: bill.e.goat | November 1, 2011, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
I like Michelle, but it is over. Endorse another candidate, and move on. Right now, we are looking to the convention to find our candidate. With Romney and Cain already polling in the 20′s, Newt and Perry pick into the high teens, Paul still with his base in the low to mid teens, and we will have a barn burner convention. The liberal media reports how divide we are, delegates go home and get the campaign rolling. We catch Obama two weeks before the election in the polls, and then win with a landslide of both popular and electoral votes. 55+ and 300+!
Posted by: Sherlocktoo | November 1, 2011, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
I have followed her for awhile. She is the only candidate with a clue. Strong willed and smart. Like her focus on regaining freedom. I know Newt, Cain, Perry, Hunt and Romny will fall in line with the Elite. Ron will not be taken seriously. Santorum I do not know. I will stick with Bachmann. Any other is a waste of time. Sorry I do not want another Bush.
Posted by: john e | November 2, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Ed Rollins was and is a snake. He is a lousy campaign manager and then blames his former employers. He did this with Ross Perot. He has had some victories and an overwhelming number of losses.
Posted by: conman | November 2, 2011, 4:55 am 4:55 am
Michelle tried hard in the big boys arena. The PC MSM and her own Party have said NO and she should go back to Minn. to run for her House seat. She then should endorse Newt if she wants to see real conserv solutions ala Newt.org.
Posted by: Glenn Koons, LB, Ca. | November 2, 2011, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm