GOP Contenders Boycott Univision Debate Over Marco Rubio Flap
The Republican presidential nominees banded together and announced they will boycott a Univision debate this January, claiming the Spanish-language network engaged in unethical journalistic practices when trying to extort an interview from Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.

In a letter to the Republican National Committee, three Florida Hispanic Republicans claimed Univision attempted to extort an interview from Rubio in exchange for not airing a story about the arrest of Rubio’s brother-in-law in 1987. The Florida legislators asked the Republican presidential candidates to not participate in the Univision debate scheduled for Jan. 29, 2012.
All but one major candidate — Ron Paul — confirmed to ABC News that they will not participate in the event until Univision addresses the issue.
Rubio, who some consider to be a viable vice presidential candidate, though he’s denied any desire for the VP slot, declined to discuss the incident when asked to comment on it at the Washington Ideas Forum Wednesday.
“I think it’s unfortunate,” said Rubio. ”The whole thing is something I really don’t even want to comment on. I didn’t want to comment on it when it happened. I think people have read the articles. They speak for themselves. They’re accurate.”
When asked if it is a missed opportunity for the candidates to address the public, Rubio responded, “I think they’ll find alternative forums to communicate with people. I don’t think there will be any shortage of televised debates, including on ‘Saturday Night Live.’”
Former Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman and Texas Gov. Rick Perry were the first candidates to announce their boycott of the event, sending letters to Univision executives on Tuesday.
In a letter to Univision president Cesar Conde, Huntsman’s campaign manager, Matt David wrote, “Unless Univision resolves this issue in a timely and satisfactory manner, Gov. Huntsman will not give consideration to your network’s debate currently proposed for January 2012.”
“Univision Network plays an important role in the Hispanic community, so we hope you seek such resolution,” David added. “We ask the other Republican candidates to join us in this decision and will work with them to identify another forum to debate issues that are important to Americans of Hispanic descent in Florida and across our nation.”
“Gov. Rick Perry and our team just learned of Univision’s attempt to unethically pressure a prominent Republican elected official to provide access to the station in return for Univision spiking or softening a story about a relative,” Ray Sullivan, communications director for Perry, wrote in a letter to Randy Falco, the CEO of Univision. “Even in this time of ever-changing media techniques, Univision’s unethical tactics stand out. Univision’s heavy-handed behavior has no place in the political or public policy area.
“Therefore, Gov. Perry will not consider participating in the Jan. 29, 2012, Univision debate until your network addresses this ethical breach and takes action to correct it.”
Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum released statements confirming their decision to boycott the debate unless the matter is resolved.
“We have not received any invitation from Univision for a debate, but we are troubled by these allegations and would not participate in any such debate unless and until Univision satisfactorily addresses this situation,” Ryan Williams, a spokesman for Romney, said in a statement.
“This issue was brought to Michele’s attention and she has a great deal of respect for Sen. Rubio. We reserve our right to participate in the Univision debate pending a positive resolution of this matter by Univision,” Alice Stewart, a spokeswoman for Bachmann, said in a statement.
“The reports of extortion tactics by Univision against Sen. Rubio are disturbing, especially since they cite sources within the news agency,” said Joe Desantis, the communications director for Gingrich. “They must be addressed in a satisfactory manner before Newt will consider appearing at the debate. We trust that Univision will take the time necessary to conduct a thorough internal investigation into this matter and, if it is true at any level, apologize to Sen. Rubio so that the scheduled debate can continue.”
ABC News reached out to Ron Paul’s campaign about his involvement in the debate, but did not receive a response.
Read more here about the Univision debate controversy.
ABC News’ Susan Archer, Michael Falcone, Emily Friedman, Russell Goldman, Sarah Kunin, Sunlen Miller and Jason Volack contributed to this report.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
Wow! What a bunch of hypocrites! Fox news is the biggest unethical media organization in the world filled with extortion and frauds but they gladly accepted Faux news debate?
Posted by: Big Mountain | October 5, 2011, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
LOL! My guess is these idiots will do ANYTHING to avoid another useless, waste of time debate. One less chance to royally screw up something………
Posted by: Searambler | October 6, 2011, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Totally appropriate and justified, response to a disgraceful media outlet.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | October 6, 2011, 9:09 am 9:09 am
The explanation above alleges an attempt by a media outlet to strong arm Senator Rubio, an upcoming and promising political figure. The problem I have with this account and prefacing my remarks with the fact that I have not verified the story myself is that the lynch pin of the improper demand was outing Rubio’s relative by exposing an arrest. I would ask whether the individual was indicted or charged with a crime and brought to trial and the disposition subsequent to the alleged arrest . Simply being arrested just indicates that the police had probable cause to believe that you committed a crime or had outstanding warrants. Not only would the station be liable to observing privacy laws if this was an arrest and an unarrrest after interrogation but using an arrest in any semblance of a threat against Rubio is much more than a quid pro quo. The reason Rubio will have to let this go is that he is in the public eye. Rubio, I think has a case but bringing this information out in a civil suit is going to pull out more of it.
Posted by: Jay Adler Comment | October 6, 2011, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Way to shoot the future of the party in the foot. Hispanics are the largest growing body of social conservatives, yet antedeluvian racists in our party are handing them to the Dems. Idiots.
Posted by: HAHAHA(fail) | October 6, 2011, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
The article does not report on any attempt to get an official response from Univision. Where is the Journalistic integrity in this?
This seems like a convenient ploy to avoid the ever-growing Hispanic community since its base is openly enraged with this large block of voters.
I am happy to sit and watch the racist fringe follow its principles to a sure defeat.
Posted by: Roman Von Hapsburg | October 8, 2011, 9:25 am 9:25 am
My Ancestry is directly from Spain. My Ancestors were in New Mexico & Colorado for 300 years . Marco Rubio does not represent me or any one I know. He’s an Exile who got American Tax Payer Money when his family set foot on Terra Firma in Miami. Tell him to pay back all that Govt Money.
Posted by: Patsy | October 13, 2011, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm