Oct 24, 2011 2:00pm

President Obama Announces New Program to Help Struggling Homeowners

ap obama jef 111024 wblog President Obama Announces New Program to Help Struggling Homeowners

LM Otero/AP Photo

President Obama today announced a new proposal to alleviate the pressure on homeowners who are under water, as he traveled to Nevada, the ground zero of the housing bust.

From the front porch of a Las Vegas home — which has one the highest foreclosure rates in the country — the president promoted a plan to allow struggling homeowners who are backed by federal mortgages refinance without getting a new appraisal or a full credit check. The program also eliminates some risk-based fees for borrowers.

The changes are being spearheaded by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The plan falls under the Home Affordable Refinance Program, which, the agency estimates, has helped already 894,000 families.

While administration officials say it will help thousands of homeowners, the program has its caveats. Only those homeowners whose mortgages are backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be eligible for refinancing. Borrowers must have good credit and must have kept up with their mortgage payments, with no late payment in the past six months and no more than one late payment in the past 12 months. Additionally, the mortgage must have been sold to the agencies before May 31, 2009, and not been refinanced previously under the Home Affordable Refinance Program. The loan-to-value ratio has to be greater than 80 percent.

Proponents of the program say it would help boost the economy by relieving financial stress on homeowners and reducing their mortgage so that they would have more expendable money.

But economists disagree on the number of people who would actually benefit. Some say it wouldn’t affect more than a 1 million households, a relatively small number given that more than 6 million homeowners are facing foreclosure or have delinquent payments. Others say the restrictions are too stringent and automatically cut out those under-water homeowners who have bad credit.

“It’s certainly going to be a constructive step in terms of supporting the economy,” said Karen Dynan, vice president of the economic studies program at the Brookings Institution. But “the other important point is that it’s not a free lunch. Homeowners are going to save on their mortgage payments but there’s another side of that transaction. Investors and lenders, people who fund the mortgages, are going to suffer” by getting a lower return.

The changes come as the housing market, which is central to economic recovery, continues to struggle despite record-low interest rates and government programs to help homeowners.

Even though there is an oversupply of houses and interest rates are low, demand is low, given the high unemployment and general skittishness about the direction of the economy. Even those with buying power are facing a hard time obtaining loans because banks have tightened their restrictions after the mortgage meltdown.

In its Economic and Housing Forecasts for October 2011 report, Fannie Mae forecasted that home sales will remain “sluggish” and house sales will bounce near the bottom at least for another year. The large inventory of distressed homes continues to put downward pressure on prices, according to the report.

The Obama administration’s efforts to boost the market have been met with mixed results.

The program to give first-time homebuyers a credit met with enough success that it was renewed and even extended to existing homebuyers, under certain conditions. But critics of the plan say it artificially inflated the housing market and pulled those buyers into the market who would have brought in later months or years.

The biggest criticism has been leveled at the $75 billion Home Affordable Mortgage Insurance Program, launched in March 2009, which didn’t attract as many distressed homebuyers as the administration had hoped. In fact, many homeowners who took advantage of the program ended up defaulting again on their mortgage.

Some experts say the HAMP program was not aggressive enough in tackling the issue. Others say the administration, instead of cracking down on banks, did the opposite by paying them to change mortgages of struggling homeowners.

“The problems that need to be fixed have changed over time and the policy hasn’t kept pace with what the problems are,” Dynan said. “The other problem is that things turned out to be more complicated than people anticipated.”

Some housing experts say the administration’s programs need to level the playing field.

“It’s hard to know what would have happened had they not been there,” said Preeti Vissa, community reinvestment director at the Greenlining Institute, a public policy research and advocacy group. But the impact has “been almost negligible, particularly in hardest hit states or communities of color. Much more needs to be done.”

Although few 2012 candidates have discussed the issue, the housing market will play a significant role in the upcoming elections. If it continues to weaken, it will weigh on the economy and, in turn, consumer confidence.

Even the president admitted recently that too little has been done to tackle the issue and that his administration has provided too little support to distressed homeowners.

“The continuing decline in the housing market is something that hasn’t bottomed out as quickly as we expected,” Obama said at a Twitter town hall event in July. The administration’s programs are “not enough. And so we’re going back to the drawing board.”

Unfortunately there is no silver bullet, there is no simple fundamental restructuring that will wipe away the damage done by the bursting of the housing bubble.  But there are measures that we can take that can help homeowners

He also said that no federal program could solve the housing crisis and that “some folks just bought more home than they could afford and probably they’re going to be better off renting.”

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney echoed a similar sentiment today.

“Unfortunately there is no silver bullet, there is no simple fundamental restructuring that will wipe away the damage done by the bursting of the housing bubble,” Carney told reporters. “But there are measures that we can take that can help homeowners.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

Hello America, it appears that Obama is again attempting to help pressure on Homeowners such as Al Gore, and this is what he proposes to help Al, quote: ” Fisker Automotive, backed by a powerhouse venture capital firm whose partners include former Vice President Al Gore, predicts it will eventually be churning out tens of thousands of electric sports sedans at the shuttered GM factory it bought in Delaware” the price tag was over $550 Million dollars, this did indeed help Al Gore and over 5000 Finnish Home owners. sincerely Fezzy Bear

Posted by: Fezzy Bear | October 24, 2011, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Isn’t this some of the SAME lack of standards that caused the mortgage melt down in the first place??? Its simple! People without jobs cannot afford to make mortgage payments! This NEW plan will fail just like all the other plans did! – What Obama needs to do it work with the GOP to create jobs and put these people back to work!!!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 24, 2011, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Once again, OBOZO-the-Clown doubles down on STUPID by dictatorially planning to do the same irresponsible, reckless, guaranteed-to-fail-and stick-it-to-taxpayers mortgage insanity that “countrywide-sweetheart-loan” dodd and buffoon barney frank used to create the current financial disaster.

Posted by: TeaPartyNation | October 24, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

I was going to comment, but every time I start dirty words start flowing out…..grrrrrrrr

Posted by: samhiguchi | October 24, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

At the end of the day, many, many people bought more house than they could really afford. I know that many of them were pushed by realtors and mortgage brokers, but you have to use common sense. Not a fan of Obama’s proposals here, because they ignore obvious facts. Of course, the real answer to the housing crisis is to help the economy by making the US a more favorable place for companies to do business (gasp! he said it!).

Posted by: Brian Levine | October 24, 2011, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

This is a drop in the bucket, and articles like this and others show that some don’t get the housing problem. If you have a $200,000 mortgage at 6% and can refinance to 4% this puts about $130 per month in your pocket. That doesn’t change the fact that you’re still 25%+ underwater and trapped in a negative equity situation for 5-10 years. This won’t spur transactions. It won’t change the fact that a lot of the people this is designed for would be better of strategically defaulting on their mortgage.

Posted by: Jake Chadwick | October 24, 2011, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Premier Obama says he will save the People’s housing. Prosit. He did what Comrade’s Reid and Pelosi (Is Nice) could not do.

Posted by: Zman | October 24, 2011, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

This really is the icing on Obama’s cake of failure. Democrats negotiating the housing market for people who couldnt pay mortgages is why we had a housing bubble and an huge economic crisis. Dont believe me? Ask Ben Bernanke.

Posted by: Get Real | October 24, 2011, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

How many of you still dont believe the Obama administration is out to prolong and complicate our economic crisis so they can exploit it for money for the democratic party?

Posted by: OMGno | October 24, 2011, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Many of these folks lied on there loan applications with help from Barney Frank, now Obama wants them to lie some more!!!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 24, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Why not take those who are behind on their mortgage and force banks to restructure the mortgage. Don’t spend money to refinance but instead restructure for a longer period, beyond 30 years at homeowners current rate. Then focus on getting economy healthy. Once economy is healthy then homeowner can spend their own money to refinance for lower interest/less years etc. I have no sympathy for someone who bought a home they could not afford. I do have sympathy for those who fall behind because of jobs loss etc.

Posted by: NoSpin1600 | October 24, 2011, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

“At the end of the day, many, many people bought more house than they could really afford. I know that many of them were pushed by realtors and mortgage brokers, but you have to use common sense.” While I agree that this and other comments from other posters are true, the argument is that many others were on the cusp of the flipping craze and took out ARMs without attempting to buy more house than they could afford. When the housing prices colapsed they became drive-by collateral damage victims who were put them underwater by circumstances and left with houses worth less than the amounts that they financed and couldn’t refinance when interest rates (at least temporarily) started climbing.

Posted by: Publius | October 24, 2011, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Again the stupid remarks. NO matter what he does people will blast him. He got Osama and some will say Bush did it…oh yeah right! He did not go into a war in Libia but supported them and now they got the other nut. He saved the banks and auto industry and going into a Depression. He is bringing all troops out of Iraq…but of course some will say Bush was going to do it by Dec. 2011 and others will say he is wrong, he shouldn’t be doing that. Well if he’s wrong then Bush was wrong too! The majority of Americans want us out of there, we should stay and keep helping them while we need the help in our own country? I’m really disgusted with some of the remarks. No matter what he does or says he is wrong from day one. Well guess what, we would be in this mess if it weren’t for the Bush Aministration and DECADES of fraud by BOTH PARTIES. Wake up!

Posted by: Barb | October 24, 2011, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

2 years too late for us . . . but now it’s on our credit history : (

Posted by: BOsipov | October 24, 2011, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Too late.

Posted by: FreeinNH | October 24, 2011, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Again the stupid remarks supporting obama. They refuse to recognize the facts. His ever changing focus from being “laser focused” on one thing for a week and then going on to the next. All the while, more people lose their jobs.

Posted by: jonny | October 24, 2011, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

jakechadwick: you are pretty much on the money. just do the math folks, just do the math then you will see it is pretty much smoke and mirrors. makes for great sound bites while campaigning. speaking of saving money, how much have taxpayers spent in the last two months driving that bus around the country? tens of thousands I suspect. if Frank and Dodd are involved in this latest foray, double check your wallets. Finally, SolyndraGate, SunPower, Guns to Mexico, and Cars for Finland would have all made a very nice contribution to this mortgage situation.

Posted by: Salty | October 24, 2011, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Obama is grasping for straws . . . he simply pulls one gimmick after another out of his backside hoping something will work.

Posted by: rplat | October 24, 2011, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I completely agree with the posting by Barb…just more to add. It is so true that no matter what the president does or doesn’t do, it will never be the right thing or even good enough!!!! I mean any President who will sit in that position. People always just blame the one person on top…THE PRESIDENT!! But all these people seem to forget about the remaining 535 people that make decisions before it gets to the President…if at all! So wake up people, stop blaming just one person…it is the 535 that sit in the house & senate that put a kabosh on most things….raise our taxes…make big bucks(most are millionaires)….fight like children and never get things accomplished!!!! YES 535 PEOPLE, NOT JUST ONE!!! THOSE 535 PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE ANY OF OUR BEST INTERESTS AT HEART. IT IS ALL ABOUT THEM AND WHAT THEY GET OUT OF IT. Why don’t they take a pay cut, or even better, not get paid for a year….live on food stamps, have no medical etc…LET’S SEE HOW THOSE 535 PEOPLE COULD DO IT…
WAKE UP AMERICANS!!!! IF YOU ARE GOING TO PLAY THE BLAME GAME…BLAME THE 535 PEOPLE, NOT JUST ONE (THE PRESIDENT!)

Posted by: Lori | October 24, 2011, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

It’s something…which is more than I can say about Republicans at the moment who are more concerned with taking away women’s rights and watching the country go down the drain.

Posted by: D | October 24, 2011, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

It’s now official. Obama joins the insane crowd. By allowing people to refinance principal that in many cases was based on the Frank/Dodd crime of lending up to 125% of the then appraised value, at a non-appraised rate, he ensures that the same legislation that caused the problem will just keep giving the same results to the same country. A mortgage that was 25% above a property value in 2008 is now likely 65% above an appraisal value, violating every rule of reliable lending. But never mind, they will all bee government backed and we know who will get to pay yet one more time.

Posted by: wantingbalance | October 24, 2011, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

It is to late to save his re-election. America is screaming load and clear and he will not listen until it is to late. He waits for one of his Chicago Cronies tells him what to do. In real life he waist for Pelosi and Reid to call him and tell him what to do. No business background, No running a corporation spells trouble for the Free Land. One year to go and we can take a deep breath and let a new president clean up this mans mess.

Posted by: Jim Rod | October 24, 2011, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

I-VOTE, your post in pure BULL! Most every state REQUIRES voters to have government issued ID’s in order to vote! In many states low income and retired folks can get state ID’s free of charge!
Its not a POLL TAX to require a valid ID to vote! Thats just left wing liberal misinformation!!!!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 24, 2011, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

A million here…a million there…pretty soon you’re talking real votes.

Posted by: newcountryman | October 24, 2011, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Obama’s “NEW” plan is just the same as what led to the Bank crisis in the first place. We all know that he does’t have a clue about even the basic economics but you would think he has at least one advisor that could point this out to him. How much more of his incompetency must we tolerate? The Democrats need to find a qualified candidate to run against Republican candidate then no matter which party wins the election the American people and the economy will be the real winners.

Posted by: Dave Herm | October 24, 2011, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Once again, what do I do. Axle rod and Emanuel. We have done nothing. Keep the Chicago politics rolling or call it a day. I would say call it a day. No time for this bunch of free loaders, need to go and need to go NOW. Anybody that would vote this bunch again would have to be a idiot.You have seen the results,and they are not pretty.

Posted by: specialty57 | October 24, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

I can see the government helping with the appraisal problem since the mortgagees can not control the value of their house, but NOT with avoiding credit checks in terms of employment. The ability to get new mortgage terms should be based on the ability to pay – otherwise the government is prolonging the agony of the housing problem by setting up future defaults.

Posted by: The_Mick | October 24, 2011, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

More government. It’s always the liberals’ answer.

Posted by: s | October 24, 2011, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Helping homeowners stay in a house they clearly cannot afford really does not help them at all, it simply perpetuates a bad situation. This silly belief that home ownership is the American Dream, which every politician for the past 50 years has peddled, is at the root of the housing crisis. The fact is a house is nothing more than wood, nails and paint. A family can be happy and thrive – and in many cases be better off – in a nicely rented home. They can achieve the real American Dream without chasing after a material object.Not every one should own a house. Not everyone is in a position to handle the responsibility and obligations that go with owning a house and the more we perpetuate the false belief that home ownership is what Americans should aspire to, the more people will fall victim to predatory lenders, bad loans and silly government programs aimed at keeping them in a house when they would be far better off renting. Instead, why not help these people get out of a bad loan without risking a ding to their credit? Help them into an affordable rental and help investors buy these abandoned homes and transform them into nice, affordable rentals? That would spur the economy and actually help people.

Posted by: missy moi | October 24, 2011, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

This is all very nice and will help the folks that really don’t need any help. This country needs to wake up and realize that the people who are behind in their mortgage or about to be foreclosed upon are the ones that need the help! If you want to fix the housing market the foreclosures must end, NOW. It may sound like a bail out, but the banks and mortgage companies and the government MUST eat the amount over the real value of the property and refinance the mortgage to an affordable payment for people that have incomes already living in the property. Unfortunately this won’t help the many unemployed, but it will get the housing market back to a positive state. It is truly blind stupidity to throw people with incomes out of houses that the mortgage holder will end up selling for a fraction of their worth. Far less that what they would receive if they refinanced the mortgage of the current homeowner to the amount the property is really worth. They’re going to lose the money anyway, why not refinance to the amount the property is worth? But banks and mortgage companies aren’t known for their intelligence, if they were, we wouldn’t be in this nighmare.

Posted by: Radiomantx | October 24, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Too little too late – this is nothing more than another false promise of “hope” to desperate homeowners. Banks are moving fast to foreclose; people need to STOP listening to the talking heads on TV that claim that banks don’t really want your house because they are tossing families out.

Posted by: Judy | October 24, 2011, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

He can only think of giveaway programs, he never gets to the root of the problem and tries to fix it. This man does not have a clue, it seems his entire term has been who can he pay off to get votes, not what is best for this country.

Posted by: Freedom | October 24, 2011, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I find it hard to believe people still think Obama is doing a good job ! The Democratic party always for the deadbeats and never for the honest hard working people ! I guess you get what you vote for, a sorry excuse of a President named Obama ! SAD !!!!!!!

Posted by: hard worker | October 24, 2011, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

The market seems to like these ideas – it’s up about 1000 points from last week.

Posted by: John Hanson | October 24, 2011, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

I’m a consumer with great credit, assets, equity in my home and no debt aside from my mortgage. I have never been late on my mortgage since I obtained years the loan… I cannot refinance to a lower rate because I cannot qualify on paper. I am able to afford my current mortgage – why is it that I cannot take advantage of a new loan or a restructured loan to lower my rate – without having to be late or facing foreclosure? Also, why can one qualify if you had a mortgage after 2009 that is owned by Fannie or Freddie Mac? There are many of us out there with good credit and asset and equity standing – and we cannot take advantage of lower rates. What a bunch of screwballs in congress (Republicans and Democrats alike)… Unreal!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Richard | October 24, 2011, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

JOHN HANSON | OCTOBER 24, 2011, 6:14 PM 6:14 PM……”The market seems to like these ideas – it’s up about 1000 points from last week.”

I guess the Wall St belief that European leaders/bankers have worked out arrangements to bailout PIIGS had nothing to do with the (TEMPORARY) market rise?

Posted by: deanbob | October 24, 2011, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

To Fox News types—the GOP has NO PLAN to fix the economy except to cut taxes for the super rich (who have not created any jobs in the past 8 years, in spite of the fact their taxes are at 50 year lows now) and to drastically cut spending which would put the fragile economy (caused by greed in the housing crisis) into a depression. The GOP does, however, want to increase taxes for the middle class, go figure??? The GOP wants Obama out so they can put one of the pathetically stupid candidates in, like Bachmann who rivals Palin for lack of knowledge and education, or Perry who all but flunked out of A&M, or Cain who wants a massive tax cut for the rich and a tax increase for the middle class, etc. The GOP candidates are an insult to the office of President. Their next bozo will be Donald Duck.

Posted by: usa8888 | October 24, 2011, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

I find it hard to believe people still think Obama is doing a good job ! ———You can say that again. There’s a sucker born every minute! What dopes to keep supportng him. Where is the education?

Posted by: jonny | October 24, 2011, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Better late than never, This is a win/win no brainer!!

Posted by: Common _ Sense | October 24, 2011, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Obama was a clueless Senator, and now he is a clueless President.
As a Senator Obama along with many other Democrats blocked efforts by McCain and a few others to regulate Fannie and Freddie and reign in the banks irresponsible lending practices. Obama even sued banks on behalf of ACORN to force them to make mortgage loans to minorities who were borderline or at risk borrowers. Therefore, Obama and his pals bare responsibility for the economic collapse.
Obama was working to create this mess even while he was Senator, and his votes show it. Bush is his convenient fall guy.

Posted by: mariee | October 24, 2011, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

USA8888….Rep. Bachmann was a federal tax attorney. What’s on your resume, brainiac? You think the answer is MORE government spending? How’s that workin’ out for ya. Obviously, EVERYONE is going to pay higher taxes given the trillions added to the debt when Pelosi and Reid reigned over the spending. If you think all that debt service just magically gets paid, you’re delusional. Given that two-thirds of our economy is driven by CONSUMER activity, helping Americans keep more of their paycheck seems to be a sensible, logical thing to do, does it not? You would continue to allow 48% of Americans to pay nothing in personal, federal income tax while the top 5% pay 39% OF ALL TAXES PAID? Gov’t is not the engine of growth for the private sector. Will liberals EVER understand this fundamental component of our market-based, capitalistic economy? Judging by this president and his yes-men all over Congress, I seriously doubt it. When you and your people say cutting ANYTHING from our bloated Obama budget is draconian, we should all be very worried.

Posted by: s | October 24, 2011, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

“Others say the restrictions are too stringent and automatically cut out those under-water homeowners who have bad credit.” Huh? What planet am I on?

Posted by: newcountryman | October 24, 2011, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Why is it that ABC News only tells a portion of the story? they talk about how good a job Obama is doing when hes not. His new House Mortgage Bill really does nothing for the consumer, because the banks still have the option to turn you down. For the average hard working, honest citizen, Obama has done nothing. Im a small buisness owner, and three years ago i was doing great. Today im on the verge of bankruptcy. Where is my bailout? Where are my millions? I hope next November that most Americans have had all this “change” they want. I know i have.

Posted by: Scott | October 24, 2011, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

i have good credit but a high debt to income ratio. the new rule with a 80% loan to value ration will not help as before with the high dti. I have one late payment in all my years of home ownership just last month. Obama will not help the majority of people iin the $30000 total household income bracket unless the new mot=rtgage payment is taken into consideration as a part of the process

Posted by: marge | October 24, 2011, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

I didn’t see it in the story. Is this for confirming loans only? One of the problems that no one seems to talk about (and is in line with the comment that people bought more home than they could probably afford) is that there are so many “jumbo” loans in play, and even fewer solutions to help those stuck in an under water situation with at “jumbo” loan. Do any of these plans help those people?

Posted by: Ryan | October 24, 2011, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Its going to be nearly impossible for Obama to roll back the damage done by Barney Frank and his pals at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!!!

Posted by: RadioMan77 | October 24, 2011, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

“But economists disagree on the number of people who would actually benefit. Some say it wouldn’t affect more than a 1 million households, a relatively small number given that more than 6 million homeowners are facing foreclosure or have delinquent payments. Others say the restrictions are too stringent and automatically cut out those under-water homeowners who have bad credit.”

Is this bill trying to help people that don’t need help? If you have good credit and not behind on your payment why do you need help? What kind of idiocy is this? Another trick to fleece middle class american making those who don’t really need the help that much richer.

Posted by: Sothonod | October 24, 2011, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Great…let’s continue to help all those mortgage holders backed by Freddie or Fannie! What about all of us whose mortgage is with a private lender that doesn’t cooperate with any government solutions or even care about your personal hardships?? Where’s the help for us to refinance our inflated interest rates and unaffordable high monthly payments and our home is not even under-water yet!!??

Posted by: Desperateinva | October 25, 2011, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Bull! He can’t even step in for Lake of the ozarks and the FERC ruling to destroy 1260 homes and 4000 structures on the lake. Many have written and Obama has not said one thing. Saving homes? Believe me, I am not buying it. No way I want this guy back. He appointed the 5 Commissioners at Ferc and he is accountable. See docket P-459 on Ferc, elibrary. shame on him for such neglect.

Posted by: lucy welch | October 25, 2011, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

The banks are at it once again, making a febble attempt to look like they are trying to help others when really they are only helping themselves. Please keep in mind that banks will never do anything that is not benefiting themselves, period. Lets look at this new scheme. Banks are now saying that they will refinance those homeowners who are underwater, current on their mortgage and have had only one late in the last 12 months. Banks are shrewd, only willing to help those that have helped them. Why? Because those houses with mortgages greater then their value are a big loss for the bank to take back. The last thing they need are more REO’s. Instead they would rather keep some sucker in a house only to maintain their asset while really in the end it is a big loss for the homeowner.The American dream has been shattered and the days of buying a home, paying off your mortgage and seeing home prices have a steady 5-8% yearly growth is gone. For at least the next 10-15 years anyway Homeowners are truly no longer homeowner’s but rather a babysitter for the banks mortgage/asset while the economy continues to lumber along. The last thing banks want is more worthless inventory harnessed with tax and insurance burdens. They rather burden that with the strong good borrower who in the end are just glorified tenants to the bank until they wise up and see that they have a long ways to go before their “homeownership” pays off….How long will it take knowing that the same house down the street sold for $250,000 and yet your still burdened with a $400,000 mortgage for a long time. It’s like the Godfather of Banks—They are going to make homeowners offers that they can’t refuse……. yet another priceless move by the bank…..

Posted by: John Gangemi | October 27, 2011, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

I don’t wanna see it but I have to say it, if the next president is not Obama, this country would probably turn in to the 3rd world direction. This mess has been piled up since Bushs’ time … just when it seems like things are taking a straight path, everybody complains and … stop playing a blame-it-on game and think positive. Obviously this program helps some of us who can barely afford to pay our mortgage and definitely don’t harm nobody.

Posted by: achex | October 28, 2011, 5:58 am 5:58 am

Can we please get a new POTUS… this is another failed joke that will limit much benefit.

Posted by: No more Odumbo | October 28, 2011, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Well I for one can say I think it’s a good plan because it effects me directly. I lost my job and have ran out of unemployment and this bill would help lower our house payment and keep us from losing our home. How is that a negative? Wouldn’t that be better for our economy than for us to have to lose our home to foreclosure? I don’t know alot about the financial world but this makes sense to me. I wonder if the majority of the people commenting on here can truly relate to this subject.

Posted by: Barbara | November 9, 2011, 10:02 am 10:02 am

This is not going to help everyone that is for sure. Especially those that have been encouraged to miss their payments. How can they encourage people to miss their payments and then eliminate those folks (that need this) from being able to apply???? Does not make sense. However, if it even helps a handful of people and IT WILL, then it needs to be done NOW. Of course jobs have to increase and the economy stimulated, but for criminy sakes let’s keep people in their homes.

Posted by: IMjazzed | November 11, 2011, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

“Some people bought more than they could afford.” is an easy out.. a great many people like myself bought a home they could easily afford while working. Job loss is rampant and a home within your means before a job loss is completely different. The good credit requirement and the “one late payment” requirement makes this program useless. And saying that “these folks should be renting.” shows how out of touch he is with the rental market. It is cheaper to buy if you have good credit….this is why I bought in the first place. In addition rent prices are on the rise and people that have had problems paying mortgages and are unemployed or underemployed are not going to be approved. Nor will they have the funds to pay a huge deposit. They need to rent out the homes that have been foreclosed on to individuals that have lost their homes for the escrow price alone. I saw the other day where they were tearing down foreclosuers. Just crazy with so many people without homes now…..tired in Texas.

Posted by: Gabby | November 17, 2011, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

There is a few things in this plan that does make sense to me.
1. How distress are you really, if you can make your payments on time and have good credit?
a. people with good credit and can make their payments on time, can refinance without government aid. Banks like these types of people.

2. The problem is these program target the wrong people and does nothing to help the distress homeowner or the housing market. It allows those with buying power more ways to buy homes cheaper and rent them for higher returns. Banks are not lending to the common home buyer, it is not a seller’s or buyer’s market, it is an investor’s market. A bank will short sell your home to an investor for 40K when you owe 260K on the loan and write off the rest via government programs. Instead of reducing the loan to 100K and righting off the rest via government programs. There is no incentive to keep homeowners in homes. Reducing the principle is the only real fix, but who is preventing this and why? The money is there, 97billion set side to help distress buyers, yet principle remind high. Why would I pay 280K for my home when the house next door is going for 80K? This does not mean you get a free house (the bank would still own it, but they have less capital risk), it makes it so that everyone is back on a fair and even playing field. This would not only apply just to distress homeowner, but everyone who is more than 40% upside down in their homes. We need to even out the market.

3. It is not the interest rate that is the problem. It is the principle balance that is killing the market. Two exact houses on the same street. One currently on the market for 80K and the other was sold for 320K in 2007. It is really that hard to see the problem?

Posted by: Itjustdontmakesense | November 30, 2011, 2:20 am 2:20 am

All these comments about President Obama being stupid, think about hes the president and your not.You guys are just bunch of stupid Republican, who can’t except anything a Democrat politician do for this country. This is whats wrong with this country its totally devided, a republican will never vote or agree for democrat candidates and the same with democrats. Wake up and for once put aside your party and do whats right for your country. By the way im not Republican nor Democrat. I vote for the right candidate and agree for the people.

Posted by: Marie | January 3, 2012, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Personally I don’t like this one. How do we teach responsible home owners how to buy
homes if all we do is bail them out. No one was there to bail out my husband and I when
we lost our home in the 90′s when the economy went south and my husband lost his job
because his company went bankrupt. We had to deal with our loss and move on and it
taught us a very valuable lesson. How to make sure you buy a house the responsible way
and take everything into account. Where was the government when others lost their homes.
This to me is just not right to keep bailing out or saving people their homes.
What’s fair is fair and so many years ago lost their homes and no one saved them.
Now it’s bail them out and save their homes and refinacing help.
Not fair to me that is how I see this.

Posted by: Maria | January 24, 2012, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Wake up America!! This whole HOPE for homeowners is a joke. A majical act right in front of your face. You better do a little research before you go thru with any of the lines of help. It is absolutely no different than going into foreclosure and going thru a debt solution agency! Yes your credit report will not show a foreclosure on your record but it will hit your credit hard for the same length of time as a foreclosure and is reported to credit companies as a forgiveness of debts which is no different than a written off foreclosure on your record. The only plus side is you keep your house that is underwater severely with a lower payment and who knows or can forecast when your house will ever rebound if it does. Even to refi at the current rates they screw you because if you do your research the new rate will be lower with a refi rate but they have jacked up the mortgage insurance which eats up almost any of the savings you could had saved plus you get the closing costs added onto the loan or pay up front. Again the positive side is that when your home loan value becomes 85% of the actual value the insurance come off and your payment will be much lower but who knows when that is. If you go thru the government website affordable homes act ask questions. they do not and will not say they are not a government employee rather non profit and when asked if they are a debt solution company they will admit such. You go to that kind of service when you have no other options to deal with debt issues right before a bankruptcy! A majority of you, admittingly or not, are in a mortgage that you should have never gotten into. May it be the banks allowed or you had to have that more expensive home than the alternative. Myself, I chose a house half the value I could afford to protect from a situation like this and am pleased with my choices. What pisses me off is the fact that everyone alound me has severely devalued my home because they couldnt pay for theirs! Now I am underwater and cannot upgrade as planned due to the irrisponsibilities of others including banks. And for Obama to put out this homeowner help with false pretenses thru the media and the campaign is disgusting! Either way I am sorry to say all of us are screwed if you take the programs help or continue to pay on a dead note. Bad creidit stays for 7 years now so consider that before you take the help!

Posted by: Cst | February 23, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.