Gingrich Attacks Ron Paul on Controversial Newsletters
Newt Gingrich pounced on challenger Ron Paul today for controversial newsletters containing racist, anti-gay slurs.
The newsletters published by the Texas congressman for years contained hateful language about blacks and gays and comments describing the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as a “world class adulterer.”
Gingrich today called on Paul to defend the racist sentiments.
“I think that Congressman Paul has to explain his own situation and how he could have had a decade of newsletters that had his name on it that he apparently wasn’t aware of,” Gingrich said.
Paul has denied being aware of the racist language.
“I didn’t write them. I disavow them. That’s it,” Paul told CNN recently, although his past statements promoting the newsletter appear to contradict them.
This isn’t the first time Gingrich and Paul have butted heads. The rivalry between the two goes back to 1995, when then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich worked unsuccessfully to deny Paul a Texas House seat in a bitter primary battle that pitted Paul against a Gingrich-backed, Democrat-turned-Republican opponent.
“He orchestrated a million-dollar campaign to keep me out of Congress,” Paul told the Houston Chronicle at the time.
Paul last week unveiled an ad attacking Gingrich for being a serial hypocrite and for building his wealth through questionable lobbying efforts.
“He’s been on a lot of different sides on all the issues,” Paul told ABC News’ Jon Karl. “He may be the opposite of what I’ve been doing for 30 years. My positions haven’t changed all that much.”
ABC News’ Jason Volack contributed to this report.

Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
7 months of campaigning and the media brings up 15 – 20 year old newsletters days before the first primary? Just after a very positive interview on the Tonight Show? Ron Paul has addressed these questions numerous times. Let’s get back to the issues. According to a CNN poll released this week the number 1 concern for the American people is the economy. Let’s talk about that.
Posted by: Robert | December 23, 2011, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Ron Paul is not a racist and he did not write the newsletters. ABC News takes its orders from the establishment. The American people are not allowed to hear the message of Ron Paul because the establishment is scared to death of him telling the truth. Oh, and in 2011 the best you can do is 20 year old newsletters? I’m pretty sure we had audio and video back in those days. Nice try ABC.
Posted by: Austin Phillips | December 23, 2011, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Gingrich challenging Ron Paul’s integrity? Please. What a joke.
Posted by: RP vs. Status Quo | December 23, 2011, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
That was a really stupid thing to do. Newt Gingrich is insulting the intelligence of all white people in this country. Whites are angry now. This silly race game playing that worked in the past, is going to blow-up in Newts face. Good luck loser. Do not count on the white vote.
Posted by: Robert | December 23, 2011, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
What a non-issue… Paul has disavowed it completely.
Moving on, which candidate has the best plan to fix the ECONOMY??? Paul has proposed $1 trillion in cuts the first year and the elimination of the income tax to stimulate growth, paid for by reducing our military empire.
And the others??? More of the same! In fact, even MORE wars!
Posted by: Renee | December 23, 2011, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
lol i dont care how newt attacks ron paul i’ve heard him enough to know he aint racist, this is the media making ‘sensationalism’ t sell some pharma pills or bank in their commercials
Posted by: suntzu360 | December 23, 2011, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
NAACP president came out and defended Ron Paul,
saying it was a smear campaign by media because the establishment feels threatened.
Posted by: isaac | December 23, 2011, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
So Newt Gingrich, he in the past two weeks told a gay man to “vote for Obama” is less of a bigot than Ron Paul, who wasn’t aware of these newsletters, let alone even write them. Yes, Newt is definitely in a position to talk about character and integrity. If this is seriously the best the MSM can do to deter an RP nomination, I must say MSM, get to bed.
Posted by: Nick | December 23, 2011, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Ron Paul is a joke candidate. He has his head in the clouds. He is the most unfit person to run for president. To allow Ron Paul continue his charade, reflects all that is wrong with America. This man promoted racist slurs for decades and made a lot of money doing so. And now, he feigns ignorance about the authorship of those materials that made him a millionaire over and over. What a pathetic liar. Ron Paul, if you were man enough to publish those incendiary and overtly racist materials (and make money from them) you should be man enough to won up to them. Hypocrites like Ron Paul are serial predators, preying on gullible youths who see him as messiah. He should hide his head in shame and ignominy. What a shameless old man.
Posted by: Benkonof | December 23, 2011, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Is that all the dirt you got on Ron Paul? Ha! Not only was that 22 years ago but he didn’t write it and he disavowed it… Over and over and over again.
I guess Ron Paul really is the best of the GOP given that all the hard digging only brought up this tired, old stuff.
The only thing that bothers me about Ron Paul is that he still thinks the Earth was created 6000 years ago. That is too fundamenal to allow him to deal with our resource issues in a rational and logical way. He is a doctor and must believe in DNA and all the testing methods. Thus, the mountain of evidence is overwelming for a Earth that is closer to 4.58 billion years old. Thus, faith will prevent us from finding a good solution for our crisis.
With that said, Ron Paul is the only candidate that can beat Obama and his policies poiint us in the right direction – spend only what we earn (resource balance) and don’t police the world (human rights). Good messages, very good.
Posted by: tankingthinker | December 23, 2011, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Well, Ron Paul needs to come clean on this issue.
If he didn’t know about the racist statements in his newsletter, then he was not being very diligent. Some people might not vote for him for that reason alone. If he truly wasn’t aware of the statements, it’s time he tell us who wrote them and why.
There actually may be something else going on here. Whether it was Ron Paul or someone else who wrote the racist comments, it might have been done to increase the number of white (racist) subscriptions to the newsletter. In other words, whoever wrote the comments, may not have been racist at all.
Regardless, this is Ron Paul’s thorn (in his side) and it’s painful for all of us.
Posted by: Jim | December 23, 2011, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
“The true antidote to racism is liberty. Liberty means having a limited, constitutional government devoted to the protection of individual rights rather than group claims. Liberty means free market capitalism which rewards individual achievement and competence, not skin color, gender, or ethnicity… In a free society every citizen gains a sense of himself as an individual, rather than developing a gropu or victim mentality. This leads to a sense of individual responsibility and personal pride, making skin color irrelevant. Rather than looking to government to correct what is essentially a sin of the heart, we should understand that reducing racism requires a shift from group thinking to an emphasis on individualism.”
Ron Paul, “What Really Divides Us”, December 23, 2002
(ACTUALLY written by him)
Posted by: Matt | December 23, 2011, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
He didn’t write them .. he disavows them .. end of story. To get the REAL story Google this sentence:
Ron Paul’s “Racist Newsletters” Debunked Once And For All !
Please don’t let the “Lame stream media” fool you. Ron Paul is our last hope .. the “Lame stream media” will do what their Big Boss 1% tells them to do to throw Ron Paul and the 99% under the bus .. don’t let it happen, we are too close and we are smarter than that .. let us proceed accordingly .. Vote for Ron Paul 2012 !!
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”
- Mohandas Gandhi
Posted by: BlessTheUSA | December 23, 2011, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Newt is nothing but a frumpy, overweight, old-school white racist from Georgia. The man is sold on the progressive ideal of segregation and class warfare.
As far as this guy being “intelligent” goes, give me a break. Lets see Gingrich challenge Paul to a Lincoln-Douglas-style debate as he has done with Obama. Paul would expose Gingrich for the intellectual infant that he is and illuminate to everyone how his love of progressive policies inherently calls into question his proposterous claim of being a true conservative. The ONLY conservative in this race is Dr. Paul!
Posted by: John Dickenson | December 23, 2011, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
laughable,
congress can pass trillion dollar bills without even being present, yet Ron is supposed to know about every line or sentence written by a ghost writer? Wow, this country screwed up!
Posted by: jeremy | December 23, 2011, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Newt Gingrich. A Draft Dodger that advocates war. A drug user that doesnt want drugs legalized. A racist that hides under a hood. He criticizes a military veteran, a medical doctor and an individualist who fundamentally opposes racism. What a hypocrite Gingrich is and what a sleazebag for organizing and paying “reporters” to run this SMEAR CAMPAIGN.
Posted by: Michael Schmitt | December 23, 2011, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Newt and the mainstream media is trying to divert all the positive attention Ron Paul has with these silly newsletters. Ron Paul has addressed this issue on numerous occasions, it’s a waste of time now, the steam has blown out. The best thing we can do now, is ignore these news articles for now on. These people writing these things are just trying to get attention.
Posted by: mass | December 23, 2011, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Oh my God. It’s all these people care about. Whenever he gets coverage on the News, it’s always with bringing up the newsletter bull****. Stop being blind. He didn’t write them, drop it for Gods sake. All of the other candidates don’t get crap like this. It’s unfair
Posted by: Gene | December 23, 2011, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Newt is a piece of crap. Who cares what he has to say?
Posted by: ashley | December 23, 2011, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
In December of 1979, Ron Paul voted YES to Martin Luther King Day. On that same day, Newt Gingrich Voted NO. This was before said newsletters were written and confirm that Paul see’s King as a hero of his as he’s said numerous times.
Also, Gingrich is a cheating slut who should not be preaching to anyone, about anything.
Posted by: Robert Timsah | December 23, 2011, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Gingrich criticizing Paul on being morally bent, that’s rich.
Posted by: Brett | December 23, 2011, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Professional writers work as ghost writers in order to write or create books, articles, reports, stories and more for other people. A ghost writer may be hired to turn an outline into a book or a story idea into a short story. They are paid for their time and efforts, but are uncredited for the writing.
While celebrity ghost writers may get some credit for their work with an appellation of ‘with’ or ‘as told to,’ most ghost writers are unacknowledged contributors to the work. In those cases, the client or publisher will require a non-disclosure agreement. In the non-disclosure, the writer must agree to never take credit for their work or reveal the fact he or she participated in the project. These non-disclosure agreements are binding and may result in potential lawsuits, loss of credibility and income.
A ghost writer is one of the least appreciated areas of work for writers. Consider for a moment some of the greatest speeches in history. The authors of those speeches are forgotten; it is the speech and the person who delivers it who is remembered. ( or the person whose newsletter the article appeared in ).
Posted by: CorAutMors | December 23, 2011, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
The fact that a newsletter attributed to Ron Paul containing racist statements was published for a number of years is disturbing, even more so than the fact that Obama was a member of a congregation with a racist pastor. Obama acknowledged the issue and we move on. Paul needs to deal with this more candidly than he has recently.
What I find more disturbing is a presidential candidate who has taken a position in 2011 that inner city youth need to be provided jobs mopping floors and cleaning toilets to divert them from careers as pimps and drug dealers. That current position needs more clarification than Paul’s irresponsible actions 20 years ago.
Posted by: Ken Ross | December 23, 2011, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I love these little trolls. So cute!
“To allow Ron Paul continue his charade, reflects all that is wrong with America.”
You heard it hear, folks! To think I thought the War on Drugs was all that is wrong with America. Or, maybe that the fact that our immigration system is broken. But… letting someone continue their “charade”?! Oh, noes! Bad, America. Bad!
Posted by: lol wut? | December 23, 2011, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Gingrich challenging anybody on moral or behavioral issues is like being preached to by a hooker on the virtues of chastity.
Posted by: Bob T | December 23, 2011, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Gingrich once called the Spanish langauge, “A ghetto language”.. Maybe we should talk about that..
Posted by: Greg | December 23, 2011, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Wow Gingrich criticizing Ron Paul. The Gingrich who divorced his wife while she was dying in the hospital and who profitted millions of dollars off of the bailouts from the taxpayers money. Wow.
Posted by: Alex | December 23, 2011, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Paul has the support of white supremacist groups that although while not openly embracing them on the flip he hasn’t denounced their messages of hate nor vocally rejected their support.
Posted by: Atilathehun101 | December 23, 2011, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Actually it was Newt McPherson that was a ghost writer for Ron Paul!
Posted by: bob | December 23, 2011, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Paul’s racism is also in his records for sponsored bills.
Read Paul sponsored bills HR 4982, HR 3863, and the really nasty HR 7955. All bills to allow racially segregated schools and to give them tax exempt status.
Posted by: Spike_dawg | December 23, 2011, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Ron Paul’s positions are the most anti-racist of the whole GOP field; therefore I highly doubt he’s capable of being racist.
Posted by: Greg | December 23, 2011, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
I would like to remind you all that Congressman Ron Paul has a lifetime of public service to back him up. His actions during all time in office bespeak a Prescient Leader who foresaw the housing crisis and tried to warn us, who voted against the Iraq war when the Bush administration were beating the drums of war, and telling us Saddam had WMD when he did not. And now he’s warning us again about the drums of war beating for an invasion into Iran a country that cannot even make enough gasoline for its people. Do you REALLY think the American people are that stupid? All anyone has to do is take 5 min to google Ron Paul and make up their own minds.
Posted by: PattyFromTexas | December 23, 2011, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
This is equivalent to a desperation “Hail Mary” pass by Gingrich! After dredging the swamp, this is what he has come up with, 20 year old newsletters written by some else?
Let’s talk about Ron Paul’s 22 year consistent voting record of following the Constitution, NEVER voting for an unbalanced budget, and NEVER voting for a Congressional pay raise. Talk about that Newt. Newt has so many skeleton’s in his closet that they scare even him! Ron Paul has been married to the same women for 52 years, has 5 children, one of which is the junior U.S. Senator from Kentucky, Dr. Rand Paul. Talk about that also Nest, please.
Posted by: SteveMT | December 23, 2011, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Don’t you anti-American Ron Paul followers know he is against war? What are you thinking? We need war to get our economy going. Vote for Romney! He promises war for all! Go Mitt! Attack Iran and China!
Posted by: blind spot | December 23, 2011, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
I am NOT a republican. I WOULD have voted for Dr. Paul in 2008. I was totally frustrated that he was basically never heard from after the first debate. I am very glad to see him still in the running this time around. Note to those who will be choosing who America gets to vote for in 2012. I am Not a republican! I WILL vote for Dr. Paul if given the choice!
It’s obvious that those in power don’t want Dr. Paul in the white house. It seems he might be able to disrupt their agenda. That is just what America needs NOW!
I would love to see America rally behind him and get him to the white house before it’s too late.
Posted by: whatha | December 23, 2011, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
In Response to Spike_dawg comment. So I looked those up. Sorry to find you are wrong, There is not even metnion of the word segragated.
HR 4982 – Close the Congressional Healthcare Loophole Act. Close the Congressional Health Care Loophole Act – Amends the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to expand the definition of “congressional staff” for purposes of determining coverage under a state health care Exchange to include all full-time and part-time employees of the federal government whose pay is disbursed under the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act for the fiscal year involved.
H.R.3863 -A bill to provide that the Internal Revenue Service may not implement certain proposed rules relating to the determination of whether private schools have discriminatory policies. Which Prohibits the Secretary of the Treasury from implementing a proposed revenue procedure entitled, “Proposed Revenue Procedure on Private Tax-Exempt Schools,” or any other guidelines for determining whether private schools have forfeited their tax-exempt status through the adoption of racially discriminatory policies.
HR 7955 – Family Protection Act. This act Abolishes the Department of Education and nullifies all regulations, contracts, licenses, or privileges issued by such Department prior to the effective date of this Act. Directs the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to provide for the orderly termination of the affairs of such Department.
Forbids any court of the United States from requiring the attendance at a particular school of any student because of race, color, creed, or sex.
Prohibits the Secretary of the Treasury from issuing in final form the “Proposed Revenue Procedure on Private Tax-Exempt Schools”, which sets forth guidelines for determining whether a private school has forfeited its tax-exempt status by the adoption of racially discriminatory policies.
Amends the Internal Revenue Code to: (1) allow an income tax credit for 100 percent of the amount of tuition paid for the elementary, secondary, or higher education of the taxpayer, spouse, or dependents; (2) allow an income tax deduction for amounts paid into an education savings account established to pay the educational expenses of a dependent child of a taxpayer; and (3) grant tax-exempt status to schools which are controlled by the parents of the children who attend them (parental schools). And much more good stuff.
Google it! Get an Education.
Posted by: DHBTX | December 23, 2011, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Google: “NAACP President: Ron Paul is not a racist”. Austin NAACP president, who has known Ron Paul for 20 years, says Ron Paul is being smeared because he is a threat to the establishment.
Posted by: Jeff Schwartz | December 23, 2011, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Of all the GOP candidates, Ron Paul gets the most support from minorities. Some racist eh?
Posted by: tommy | December 23, 2011, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Newt has no integrity. He wanted Clinton impeached for lying about cheting on hillary while he was cheating on his wife. Serial Hypocrit. Paul dealt with this issue already so why keep bringing it up? Fox news has finally stopped bringing up the issue because it is irrevelant. Other organizations keep brining this up because he is a threat to CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC and every establishment politician if Americans are given the chance to consider Pul’s views. In one new letter not written by Paul but under his name says that MLK day is “Hate Whitey Day.” Paul obviously didn’t write these because he voted for MLK Day. People like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz should be ashamed of themselves for trying to convince their viewers that Paul is racists just because it would benefit them and the people they are puppets for. And for people who think some of Pauls positions on certain bills are racist are inherently wrong because Pual is a libertarian which by definition means they can’t be racist and they treat everyone equally.
Posted by: joe | December 23, 2011, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Paul is the last thing from the racists in fact this shows how desperate the rest of the field is. Any amount of research on Paul will show he is not racists at all. President Ron Paul
Posted by: Daniel | December 23, 2011, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
The Newt Gingrich 2012 presidential campaign is a rotting pile of steaming filth. If you walk into any American Wal-Mart today and ask an American citizen, “Will you vote for Newt Gingrich in 2012?” Less than 5% of your audience will respond with a sure fire, yes. The Newt Gingrich campaign has been entrenched into American mindsets through subversive, orchestrated news coverage, not popularity. Newt Gingrich is today’s GOP front runner, but not because Democracy chose him, because Aristocracy chose him.
Newt Gingrich has skeletons of all sorts in his closet and not just in his personal relationships either, he carries his malice onto the American people. Newt Gingrich, a longtime fiscal conservative, who labels himself as a man of the people, was cited for a $500,000 credit line at Tiffanys just last year. The store is a high end designer jewelry retailer in New York, a place where most Americans could not afford a bracelet. Newt Gingrich has been cited several times for creating his immense wealth through fraudulent use of non-profit organizations, political action committees and tax dollars. Often a harsh critic of taxes on the richest 1% of America, ironically Newt Gingrich has been caught several times misusing ear marks, tax exemptions and SuperPacs himself, in order to fund his personal campaigns and agendas.
Posted by: Tough USA | December 23, 2011, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
I would love to see Mit Romny debate Obama. Mit would come out looking like a total idiot. None of these candidates stand a chance of beating Obama. People see threw there bull.
Posted by: George | December 23, 2011, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Hah! Talk about the pot calling the kettle RACIST!!!
Good one Gingrich!
Posted by: CJW | December 23, 2011, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
ABC, who cars? Ron Paul denounced these letters, and if the people believe him fine! and if they don’t, then they don’t have to vote for him! SO REPORT SOMETHING WITH SUBSTANCE!!!
For example (Donald Trump changed from GOP to Independent!) at least its new!
Posted by: Don WV | December 23, 2011, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Is this the same Newt that said the only work experience black kids had was in illegal activities?
Posted by: professorjoe | December 23, 2011, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Are these some of the Racist Quotes from 1980′s-90′s Newsletters that the MSM keeps talking about?:
“It would be great if inner city schools and poor neighborhood schools actually hired the children to do things…..What if they cleaned out the bathrooms, and what if they mopped the floors?”
“They had money on their own, they didn’t have to become a pimp or a prostitute or a drug dealer.”
“You have 43% black teenage unemployment.”
“Really poor children, in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working….they have no habit of showing up on Monday. They have no habit of staying all day, they have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash’ unless it is illegal.”
Nope. They’re blanketed Racist/Stereotype remarks made by Newt within the past few weeks….
Posted by: Curt Larson | December 23, 2011, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
It’s funny having Gingy go after Paul about racism when you look at the original vote regarding the creation of the national holiday to honor Martin Luther King Jr. If you pull up the record of the Congressional vote, it was Paul who voted “Aye” while Gingrich voted against it.
Posted by: CjScerpes | December 23, 2011, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Well, obviously he didnt write them, all you have to do is watch any YouTube video of him talking about racism or MLK and it’s obvious. It’s disappointing he hasnt yet but this thing to bed once and for all, but Ron Paul is still BY FAR the best candidate for all the multitude of reasons that got him into the lead in the polls. And Newt casting stones, Really?
Posted by: andrew | December 23, 2011, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
In 1979 Ron Paul voted yes for the MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY…
Who voted NO?
1. Newt Gingrich 2. Dick Cheney 3. Phil Graham 4. Trent Lott
Posted by: luis | December 23, 2011, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
The media needs to get their facts straight, and so does Ginrich.
The newsletters with any racist comments took place between December 1989 – July 1994, which is only 4.5 years. So, out of 56 newsletters, there were only 17 newsletters that had anything that might be considered racist, out of line, or politically incorrect.
So, it wasn’t a decade of printing racist letters. If you consider then that only 17/204 (from 1978) newsletters had anything that was controversial, that is a pretty good indicator that this set of controversial statements was only a rare time period in an otherwise consistent newsletter.
Posted by: Duke | December 23, 2011, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
I trust this issue will get vented if Ron Paul is to become President.
Posted by: Greg | December 23, 2011, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
I have yet to know of a politician that can bring me out of my voter abstinence (not apathy). Not much has changed since the first and last time that I voted. Politicians are not interested in solving problems; on the contrary, since our entire global economic (more like anti-economic if we stick to the term’s definition) system thrives on creating more problems. All politicians, whether they know it or not, like it or not, are, and have always been, puppets to the elite. Our traditions and lacking of non-conventional thinking support the elite. We’ve become so conditioned to accept and succumb to the elite, degrading them and ourselves in the process. No small wonder why the “Powers That Be” have the power that they have – we humans, collectively, are that stupid.
Posted by: AlienFromPlanetEarth | December 23, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
I have yet to know of a politician that can bring me out of my voter abstinance (not apathy). Not much has changed since the first and last time that I voted. Politicians are not interested in solving problems; on the contrary, since our entire global economic (more like anti-economic if we stick to the term’s definition) system thrives on creating more problems. All politicians, whether they know it or not, like it or not, are, and have always been, puppets to the elite. Our traditions and lacking of non-conventional thinking support the elite. We’ve become so conditioned to accept and succomb to the elite, degrading them and ourselves in the process. No small wonder why the “Powers That Be” have the power that they have – we humans, collectively, are that stupid.
Posted by: AlienFromPlanetEarth | December 23, 2011, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
This whole question comes down to the last defense bill and who voted for it.
White house demanded indefinite detention without trial in it. Human right watch,
and the ACLU came out about it against Obama about it. Google ndaa section1031
and see what the ACLU and human rights watch have to say.
Posted by: deadwrestler | December 23, 2011, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Wow Huma Khan. Ron Paul is the one candidate who won’t bomb the middle east and here you are taking the side of the military industrial complex aka Newt Gingrich
Posted by: JayS | December 24, 2011, 12:02 am 12:02 am
The RINOs are pulling out all the stops now. Ron Paul now has enough support and recognition that he can’t be denied. He has used the Republican Party as a vehicle… played them like a cheap harmonica, so to speak. He will take enough of the Republican vote no matter if he doesn’t get the nomination he will go third party near the end and the Republicans will still lose. He has them over a barrell. He knows it, his supporters know it and I know it. He and his campaign are smart… smarter than “they” are, keeping in mind of course that “they” still have the money and the power to make a real mess. But whether there is ever Dr Ron Paul leadership or not… his message will be slow to die, if ever.
Posted by: Garrett | December 24, 2011, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Newt Voted against Martin Luther King Jr being a holiday Ron Paul voted for it. Ron Paul went to Vietnam when he was drafted Newt got Defered Twice. Newt wants to continue bombing brown babies in the war on terror while throwing black babies in prison with the war on drugs. and they want to call Ron Paul racist?? get real.
Posted by: Clyde | December 24, 2011, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Who is Newt to point at somebody else being racist? Did everybody forget about his own comments?
“It would be great if inner city schools and poor neighborhood schools actually hired the children to do things…..What if they cleaned out the bathrooms, and what if they mopped the floors?”
“They had money on their own, they didn’t have to become a pimp or a prostitute or a drug dealer.”
“You have 43% black teenage unemployment.”
“Really poor children, in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working….they have no habit of showing up on Monday. They have no habit of staying all day, they have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash’ unless it is illegal.”
Posted by: Jonathon | December 24, 2011, 12:20 am 12:20 am
These accusations will only motivate Paul’s supports that much more. It brings about a certain anger because we all know they’re false. Ron Paul’s philosophy is antithetical to racism. He has adequately explained these things on numerous occasions, but he is still demonized.
But the fact of the matter is this is an effort by the media machine to destroy Paul’s efforts at the presidency. We all know that CBS, Viacom, News Corp, Tim Warner, Disney, and General Electric own the media. This is all contrived. He poses a threat to those in power. He presents a threat to the identical, status-quo Democratic and Republican parties. These parties of course present the illusion of the left/right paradigm. They are however two wings of the same bird. They are pro-globalist, pro-big government, pro-war, and anti-American.
The American people are waking up.
Posted by: Nicholas | December 24, 2011, 12:25 am 12:25 am
I really don’t like all these reporters calling me fringe. Im work 9-5, I have a family and I am an Iraq War Veteran. These people are making me want to vote for Ron Paul even more!
Posted by: Chris | December 24, 2011, 12:35 am 12:35 am
You guys pretty much got it covered here in the comment section! But I saw this one really annoying statement written by someone who presupposes to know far more than he actually does… that someone being “Benkonof”.
According to “Benkonof”, Ron Paul isn’t a viable presidential option because “he believes the earth is 6,000 years old.” Aside from the extremely inplausible possibility of being some sort of psychic, the only rational presumption is that what drove this person to say something so foolish is a fundamental misunderstanding of the bible and the Judeo-Christian Heritage.
So clearly and concisely, to set the record straight for a while before another fool comes in and attempts to twist it once more:
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1)
–Whoa now slow down, I know you’ve seen this before but I doubt you’ve really seen it. According to this verse, when was the earth created? The same time heaven was created. But beyond that, when exactly was the earth created? IN THE BEGINNING. It doesn’t say 6,000 years ago, nor does it say 3.5 billion years ago, it says that Earth was created IN THE BEGINNING.
“Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.” (Genesis 1:2)
–Hopefully you’ve read this more carefully and considered what’s written. When was the earth formless and empty, before or after it’s creation? Don’t think too hard or you’ll miss the simplicity of it. Could the earth be formless and empty BEFORE even being created? Or in other words, had the earth not already been created it wouldn’t be considered either formless nor empty… it wouldn’t be considered at all, because it wouldn’t exist.
Understanding that many of you agnostics and atheists have no interest in understanding what the bible really says, or what true Christian’s really believe, I write this only to defend one simple truth:
Ron Paul is smarter than you think.
Posted by: Zilla | December 24, 2011, 1:26 am 1:26 am
These quotes bear absolutely no resemblance to the years of speeches that Paul has given in Congress. I wager he had a rogue writer that used his position in the newsletter staff to throw in his own brand of politics and there was not editorial oversight by Paul. Guilty of negligence at worst. And for those who grasp at “just as bad as saying them himself if he was so careless as to not read everything that his staff wrote” you are simply out of ammo.
This is nothing different than the bloggers of today – they are not all approved and edited by their cover publisher. How many articles today are written by an ABC “Staff” or CNN “Staff” where no authorship is given. Listen to the substance that Paul is promoting, not the shlock that a Paul-wannabe wrote 20 years ago. If this is the best dirt that can be found then these authors have just vetted Paul as the most credible runner in the pack.
Posted by: Java McPhearson | December 24, 2011, 1:29 am 1:29 am
This article is of course completely lame, but at least ABC has the integrity (thus far) to keep comments enabled. Not so for the New York Times. Apparently, Gingrich is in favor of censoring his opponents supporters now.
Posted by: Ron Smith | December 24, 2011, 1:43 am 1:43 am
What happened to the “positive campaign” promise Newt, you filthy liar. Ron Paul should explain? Why? He has explained the newsletters a thousand times. Try to keep up, Newt and ABC. How embarassing for you…
Posted by: Ron Smith | December 24, 2011, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Paul published these newsletters over a 20-year period. They had his name on them and often his byline and spoke of his personal experiences. What’s more, he owned them and made money off them from 1979-2001. To pretend he knew nothing about them is ludicrous.
If he really didn’t approve of what was being written he could have stopped the newsletters at any time.
Posted by: Alan | December 24, 2011, 1:47 am 1:47 am
After reading that if its true he’s got my vote, Its about time someone was honest not only with thereself but with everyone.
Posted by: Jeff Ward | December 24, 2011, 2:03 am 2:03 am
Anyone with half a brain knows racist Paul as president will only bring all the white troops home from Afghanistan and all those military bases and make the black troops stay and fight for the empire, like a slave army. Same for latinos and Asians, they gotta stay too. And defend the empire.
The same with Paul working to remove the necessity for an income tax. Yeah, for white people only. Blacks, latinos, and Asians will still have to pay an income tax when white people no longer have to by law.
The same with Paul and his pledge to end the drug ‘war.’ He’d only spring non-violent white people in jail for possession and use. And leave all blacks, latinos, and Asians who smoked dope or did coke and got caught to rot in jail. And probably throw more blacks, latinos, and Asians in jail who smoke dope or do coke because with all the white people gone there would be more room for them in jail.
Like I said, people with HALF a brain know these things to be true.
The rest of us with a whole brain know Paul’s not a racist.
Gingrich is down to Pull My Finger to try and get some attention. And most knew he would reach that point in short order.
Posted by: dom youngross | December 24, 2011, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Ive watched Over a thousand hours of video of ron pauls speeches,calling him a racist or claiming he wrote those are unbelievable and no way true. He is no way racist or wavering from the constitution and i have a renewed faith in america after studying his message. Thats why its ron paul or nothing, we will not vote for status quo anymore.
Posted by: darryl payne | December 24, 2011, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Gingrich is one to talk ,, He voted against MLK day and Ron Paul voted for it! Whos the real racist?
Posted by: Jay Tea | December 24, 2011, 3:30 am 3:30 am
Ron Paul’s an anti-Semite. Fact.
Posted by: raj | December 24, 2011, 3:43 am 3:43 am
why didn’t ron paul sue those who were using his name without his approval? ron paul is an educated physician, who knows about malpractice laws and law in general, so why didn’t he sue them? if anyone uses your name in such a way as to soil your reputation, wouldn’t you sue? ron paul is denying his involvement but his silence then is deafening, not to mention his silence now. if there is a possibility now, he should sue those who used his name on those letters. it’s a good thing the media discovered those letters and brought them to the attention of the public, people need to know these things before they cast their vote. a leopard doesn’t change its spots, just saying. if ron paul is innocent, he should sue or at the very least take a lie detector test.
Posted by: david | December 24, 2011, 4:01 am 4:01 am
Grasping at straws. Give it up, you’re toast, Newt.
Posted by: gao xia en | December 24, 2011, 6:25 am 6:25 am
I don’t think Gingrich has a leg to stand on. He told a gay person just the other day to vote for Obama and he said that Palestinians are an invented people, sort of like a robot. I don’t think that the newsletters are the issue. The issue is the desperation of the Main Street Media and the Republican Party for bringing up this garbage that will not lose one vote from Ron Paul supporters. Gingrich himself knows that Paul is not anti gay, or racist. Everybody knows that. No matter what the newsletters said. The real issue is Wall St and Main st. Gingrich, the other candidates and the press are ll owned by them. Ron Paul is the only candidate that is not.
Posted by: marty | December 24, 2011, 6:30 am 6:30 am
Paul addressed the again on Cavuto’s show. He admits to negligence in oversight but disavowed the message. The head of Austin’s NAACP did come out several years ago and defend Paul stating that Paul was no racist. I think you should judge the man’s characters by his actions. As a doctor, he treated all poor, including minorities, for free. He has been outspoken about the penal and justice system being unfair to minorities and way to attempt to minimize that. I understand the newsletters needed to addressed, but look at what actions the man has taken. Free care as a doctor, wasn’t as easy as given away tax payer money for some affirmative action program, the man took it our of his own pocket. That to me says character.
Posted by: Alan Clifton | December 24, 2011, 6:45 am 6:45 am
One thing is certain, Ron Paul will come in ahead of both Gingrich and Perry in Virgina. Gingrich, who lives in McLean, Virgina can’t even properly manage to get on the ballot, and that conceited wind-bag wants to run the country?
Frankly, I’ve never seen fielded by the Republican party such a sorry bunch of candidates. I don’t count Paul as a Republican, because he’s really a libertarian like Gary Johnson. Ron Paul, including all his imperfections, is the better man out of all the other Republican candidates. The Neocon welfare-warfare machine will come down on Ron Paul with both feet if he wins Iowa and poses a threat in New Hampshire.
All of you RP supporters better be ready for the nastiest fight that you’ve ever been in.
Posted by: Ludwig von Mises | December 24, 2011, 7:17 am 7:17 am
I see, Newt Gingrich the man who said inner city kids have no work ethic calls out Ron Paul, the man who defended the “Ground Zero Mosque” and opposes the death penalty and the “war on drugs” because it is applied more frequently on minorities. The title of this article should be “Newt Gingrich: The Serial Hypocrisy Continues”.
Posted by: Robert Fallin | December 24, 2011, 7:31 am 7:31 am
30 years in the public eye and these newsletters are the only dirt that anyone can find? He obviously didn’t write them.
Posted by: Clinton | December 24, 2011, 7:42 am 7:42 am
He didn’t ‘attack’ him, merely questioned him. So many reporters twist the headlines for Gingrich, and most Repub candidates for that matter, to make them look bad. It turns of come readers if you do it too much. Try writing headlines without emotion.
Posted by: EricBballCourt | December 24, 2011, 7:49 am 7:49 am
Wow Newt questioning anyone else’s integrity is questionable but Ron Paul’s? I guess Newt will go into stand up comedy next.
Posted by: mgginva | December 24, 2011, 8:18 am 8:18 am
almost 30 year old nonsense? and it been debunked twice by independent sources? yet still the media is pushing this.. they r very very desperate i tell you. and this is a Black guy by the way.. its not working.. try another tactic..
Posted by: James | December 24, 2011, 9:37 am 9:37 am
As a democrat I will not vote for Ron Paul, but this newsletter BS is just that, BS. I don’t think Ron Paul is a racist. They did the same thing to Harry Truman, saying he was a member of the Missouri KKK when in fact Truman opposed the KKK and was a major factor in integrating our armed forces.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 24, 2011, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
These newsletters were written under his name, and some had very racist comments in them. That is a fact. Paul profited monetarily from their release. THAT is a fact. Even if he didn’t write the racist parts, he had a responsibility to know what was going out under his name. Either he knew about the racism, agreed with the sentiment, and let them go out – OR – he didn’t know or care WHAT was said under his name in his newsletters. His supporters dismiss these newsletters simply because he personally did not pen them. Those same supporters hold Obama personally responsible for every single thing that every single person under him in the government does. One more example of I.O.K.I.Y.A.R………….(It’s OK, IF you’re a Republican).
Posted by: Searambler | December 24, 2011, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
There’s a Bible verse: “For they sow the wind, and they will reap the whirlwind”
The tea party republicans have attacked President Obama on just about everything including his birth and race, now they attack each other. They’ve made presidential politics into a carnival side show that includes magic tricks and mis-direction. Now they are practicing these tactics on each other.
Sadly to say my parties DNC will make these attacks look like blowing kisses. It shouldn’t be like that, debate policies and issues that concern the American people. Let the entertainment industry promote carnival events.
Posted by: tmferretti | December 24, 2011, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Headline tomorrow: Ron Paul attacks Newt Gingrich on being an adultering, speak-without-thinking, good-for-nothing, pile of fat.
Headline August 27, 2012: GOP selects someone other than Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich as the GOP candidate for president.
Posted by: HarryRambler | December 24, 2011, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Newt knows that Rob Paul is not a racist and that I can completely guarantee you. So this shows just how low the man Newt from my state will stoop. We know him here in GA. We are ashamed that he is from this state. Leave the piece of garbage be because he is pure one hundred percent snake poison. I could write a book on this guy.
Posted by: Bill Dixon | December 25, 2011, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Newt’s so stupid, he forgot to collect signatures to get on Virginia ballot, then (despite paying $450,000 for his wife’s necklace) only paid homeless people $1.50/signature, and couldn’t collect enough signatures to be on Virginia ballot. That shows the leadership he’d have with Newt. Credit to Romney and Ron Paul for being the only two that collected enough votes to be on the Virginia ballot.
Posted by: Joe | December 25, 2011, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I don’t know that Ron Paul is a racist, but this story certainly brings up some major concerns about his leadership and the company he keeps at a very minimum. I also am concerned by the nutty kooks that come out of the woodwork to support him on the internet (look at some of the bizarre comments on this story!)
I’m not saying that I can’t support Ron Paul, but I am concerned and would like to see some more light shed on this. Ron’s comments in previous years when this brought up certainly leaves a lot of questions.
Posted by: Matt | December 25, 2011, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
At least ABC didn’t invent the news this time around. Only Dr Paul can beat Obama in November. I would never vote for RP if he was racist. I don’t need to worry, either, as he is the only person with any integrity from either party come fall.
Posted by: erschiessen | December 25, 2011, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Everybody knows in my district that I didn’t write them and I don’t speak like that… and I’ve been reelected time and time again and everyone knows I don’t participate in that kind of language. The point is, when you bring this question up, you’re really saying ‘you’re a racist, or are you a racist?’ The answer is no, I’m not a racist. As a matter of fact, Rosa Parks is one of my heroes, Martin Luther King is a hero, because they practiced the libertarian principle of civil disobedience and nonviolence. Libertarians are incapable of being a racist because racism is a collectivist idea: you see people in groups. A civil libertarian as myself sees everyone as an important individual.
—Ron Paul, CNN, January 10, 2008
Posted by: L | December 26, 2011, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Highly energetic blog, I enjoyed that a lot. Will there be a part 2?
Posted by: Dewayne Pautz | January 12, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm