Pelosi Not Sitting on Trove of Gingrich Secrets

Newt= one, Pelosi= zero.

Wrong Pelios=1, Newt=zero. Why? She got to float the idea that he is hiding ethics violations, without actually mentioning what they are. Media will now begin to look for them. Newt response was..if she says something she should get in trouble. Not that she had nothing to tell, just that she is not allowed to say what it is.

The only thing Pelosi is sitting on is her head since it is up her butt..

Nancy and Newt did appear to have a cozy relationship while discussing climate change during that commercial. Newt has fooled around a time or two so perhaps she has a “story” herself.

CB, i read you 10/4, brother. Four more years of Obama is like committing suicidal. Division, hatred, bribery, chaos…it’s worst in the history of mankind.

@ Bunny,

First, that has been debunked by his daughter. Second, usually when someone is dying then they normally aren’t around over 25 years later.

Typical robo-lib comment though.

“It would be unethical for Pelosi to reveal my extensive and damning record of unethical behavior.”

Is that what you’re saying, Newt? Real winner you got there. Campaign season keeps getting better and better.

She’s old now. She should retire from Congress and follow her true calling. Being a comedian.

It’s actually Nancy=1 Newt=0. Nancy knows better than to say anything. However, she knows in saying something coy about it, that people will talk. Newt stupidly fell into her plan, because now everyone knows something was up. His comment makes it quite obvious that there is something big hidden there. Booyah

that she developed while she was on the ethics committee, then that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I hope that members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.”—yes. Let’s call the cops for telling the truth about you!!!!! Talk about a man who KNOWS he’s got HUGE skeletons in his closet……..OUTSIDE the having oral sex in the parking lot by the wife of one of his workers while he was still married and cheating on two wives, leaving one while she was sick with cancer, having her sign divorce papers in the hospital while recovering from cancer surgery. being forced OUT of the house on ethics violations- and you think threatening to bring up charges for TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUT YOU is a Christmas present?????????? I thought someone thought he was smart. He basically just admitted he’s got dirt up his ying yang. duh!

First, that has been debunked by his daughter. Second, usually when someone is dying then they normally aren’t around over 25 years later.—uuhh no. His first wife had uterne cancer. She was dying, and she had surgery and had major parts of herself removed, and while she was sick he was cheating on her, and while she was in the hospital recovering from surgery for her cancer, he served her with divorce papers. TRUE STORY. But…that’s only the begining. while he was supposed to be working, and his kids were being watched by his staff, he was out in the parking lot getting oral sex performed on his by the wife of one of his workers. HIS STAFF have reported this, and the funny thing is, this was WHILE he was going after Clinton, however, Clinton at least was behind closed door. Newts staff was trying very hard to KEEP THE KIDS AWAY FROM THE CAR while this was going on, but they passed closed enough to see it, and Newt just turned to them with a smug smile while his KIDS were RIGHT THERE< too short, so his staff member, to see what was happening to Daddy in the car!!!! HIS OWN STAFF reported this, the actual person who was with the kids and he has NEVER DENIED IT! He is a SCUM BAG of the highest degree.

I would vote for a tree, a stone, a dead person, before I would vote for Newt. In fact, I will vote AGAINST Newt. Put anybody up there. Drag Carter out of the old age home, and I would vote for him rather than Newt. Gingrich is pond scum to women. I will make such a Herculean effort to vote AGAINST HIM as I have never made to get to the polls in my life! NOTHING will keep me from voting AGAINST him. This, from the person who may, maybe, could have voted for Mitt.

San Fran Nan, Really how did the Presidio end up in your RE portfolio after Clinton closed the base. Talk about Good ole Boys network. Nancy has a pair!!!!!

Rimshot! Nice one, Newt. Looks like you learned a few tricks from your “colleagues” the last time you were in Congress.

The pubic ought to read the public records:

Jan. 22, 1997 -
The House on Tuesday voted overwhelmingly to reprimand House Speaker Newt Gingrich and order him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 penalty, the first time in the House’s 208-year history it has disciplined a Speaker for ethical wrongdoing.

To quote George Wills, who could never be labeled “liberal” –

“Gingrich’s is an amazingly efficient candidacy in that it embodies everything that is disagreeable about modern Washington. He’s the classical rental politician. People think that his problem is his colorful personal life. He’ll hope that people concentrated on that rather than, for example, ethanol. Al Gore recanted ethanol. Not Newt Gingrich. Industrial policy of the sort that got us Solyndra, he’s all for it. Freddie Mac, he says, hired him as a historian. He’s not a historian.”

“Gingrich reacted to Pelosi’s comments by thanking her for an “early Christmas gift” and he asserted that Pelosi would be violating House rules if she disclosed anything from the ethics investigation beyond public record.”

I love how he DIDN’T say ‘She has nothing’ or ‘I didn’t do anything wrong’. His first instinct was to attack her and issue a veiled threat of some sort of Congressional action against her if she released info from that year long investigation. Tells you a lot about the (lack of) character of the man…………….

No, Nancy, really. Tell us what you know. Tell us everything that you know and do it now. That is, if there is something more to tell.

What’s amazing is not that this woman acts slimey, it’s that the press lets her get away with acting slimey. Who is the ethical journalist that looks her in the eye and asks her to explain herself? Anyone?

*crickets*

Bringing Axelrod in to write your headlines? Yesterday Pelosi says Four of us locked in a room in an undisclosed location for a year. A thousand pages of his stuff.” Today she spouts the absolutely ridiculous statement “Leader Pelosi was clearly referring to the extensive amount of information that is in the public record And that’s your headline? Not Speaker Pelosi further disengaged from reality or something really descriptive?

Where have we heard this type of extortion before? Julian Assange of WikiLeaks.

Review of the report shows a very similar pattern to the “Media Matters” organization that does the bidding of the Administration. The focus of the ethics investigation centered upon overstepping the line of a 501c(3) organization, a status that Media Matters currently shares.
Are there any questions about donations to Media Matters? Has anyone taken a tax break due to donations to Media Matters?

People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

Well, here are two people who formerly served 3rd in line for the presidency, and both are utter fools.

Just another example of what a hopeless situation our country is in.

She REALLY doesn’t want to mess with Gingrich, he’s way too smart for the likes of her!
Posted by: razmataz | December 6, 2011, 11:06 am.

LOL! Yeah, he’s so smart he got caught and smacked with 84 charges of ethics violations while Speaker of the House. Brilliant! He resigned in disgrace from the House. What a genius! He’s made tens of millions of dollars as a lobbyist, while complaining about the influence of lobbyists on Congress. What a thinker! Talking tough, and being an arrogant ass, doesn’t mean he’s smart. It just means he’s a Republican………….

Ya just gotta love the way ABC managed to slant this news by putting Newt’s statements AFTER Pelosi’s statements. In point of fact, Pelosi did not retract her initial threat until AFTER Newt’s remarks slapping her down. Pelosi backed down as a CONSEQUENCE of Newt’s rebuttal, not on her own volition as this ABC article tries to insinuate, with Newt making some kind of after-the-fact sour grapes comment.

ABC deliberately reversed the chronology of the two statements to avoid making Newt look powerful and Pelosi look weak, which was in fact what really happened.

we pay politicians an actual salary for sitting in a room for a year digging up dirt on people , really ????

What can you say about PIgloci, Fulsom Street Fair supporter.

Can Obama run on his record? No.

Look for accusations, misdirection and class warfare for the next 11 months…

And Democrat idots will lap it off the floor while their own country is destroyed right before their eyes and they won’t even notice because they’re so dazzled by the smears….