South Carolina’s Immigration Law Weighs on Latinos’ Minds Before GOP Primary
CHARLESTON, S.C. – On a humid, rainy winter morning on the outskirts of Charleston, Shirley Juarez is setting tables, laying out doormats and getting ready for another weekday lunch rush at El Chapin, a Central American restaurant here. It’s a taste of home for the Guatemala native who came to the United States in 2009.
But her life is no longer what it was a year ago. Her sister is now gone, deported back to Guatemala after South Carolina passed one of the country’s strictest immigration laws. Left behind is her sister’s young son.
“I felt hopeless when they deported her,” she said in Spanish. “They didn’t give her the chance to stay.”
The deportation occurred after South Carolina last year became one of a handful of states to pass controversial laws cracking down on illegal immigration. The law enabled police to stop anyone suspected of being in the country illegally to check for proof of citizenship. While the Department of Justice later sued the state – blocking parts of the law from implementation – the move came too late for Juarez’s sister.
With the state’s Republican primary set for Saturday, the immigration issue is once again on people’s minds here. South Carolina was the state with the biggest Hispanic population growth in the past decade, a jump of nearly 150 percent, according to the 2010 census. Thus far, however, most of the GOP candidates have done little to court the Hispanic vote.
“I don’t think the politicians – and in particular the Republicans – are doing anything to win the vote of the Latino population,” Myriam Torres, a professor at the University of South Carolina, said in an interview this week. “They have this idea or this prejudice – I don’t know which – that the Latino population in South Carolina is a group that doesn’t vote and that is wrong.”
Nivardo Vivar, for instance, is a Hispanic student at the College of Charleston who will vote for the first time in a presidential election this year.
“Even though in the past the youth vote hasn’t been that strong, now we’re realizing that our future isn’t as clear as we had thought,” Vivar said. “It was like a shock, I think, for us to realize that maybe things weren’t becoming the way we had imagined, so now we want to do something about it.”
While Latinos traditionally vote Democratic, concern about the country’s lackluster economic recovery and dissatisfaction with the Obama administration’s inaction on immigration reform could have given Republicans an opening this year to woo Latino voters.
But other than Newt Gingrich, few of them have made any attempts to do so. “I think that’s a mistake because our population is very diverse and some parts of it are Republican,” Torres said.
Indeed, most of the candidates have taken hard-line stances on immigration. Only days before the Iowa caucuses, front-runner Mitt Romney said that, as president, he would veto the DREAM Act, a bill that would provide a path to citizenship for some undocumented children of immigrants who attend college or serve in the military.
Earlier this week in New York City, Romney’s stance landed him amid a confrontation with a Peruvian immigrant named Lucy Allain, who now has a 4.0 GPA at college, but no path to citizenship here. “I’m undocumented,” she said to Romney. “I want to know, then, why are you not supporting my dream?”
“Because if someone comes here illegally…,” the former Massachusetts governor responded.
“But I didn’t come here illegally,” Lucy said. “And I have a 4.0 GPA.”
In addition, Romney lately has touted the backing of South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, who signed the state’s immigration law, and he has publicized the endorsement of Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state who helped author the controversial laws enacted in other states such as Alabama and Arizona. Texas Gov. Rick Perry, the former Republican candidate, said days before he dropped out of the race that in the wake of the federal government’s intervention in the South Carolina immigration law case, there now exists a “state of war” between the two sides.
In a state where more than five percent is Hispanic, the dismay, the fear and the frustration that immigrants feel is now evident.
As the clock ticked toward noon, Juarez got back to work. Despite the claims of some anti-immigration politicians who contend that immigrants like Juarez are taking Americans’ jobs, she argued that nothing could be further from the truth.
“If we are given the chance to work – no matter when, no matter what hour – we work. We’re not taking anyone’s jobs,” she said with an exasperated sigh.
Upon hearing of Juarez’s story – the family torn apart, the child left behind- Gov. Haley Thursday said, “I am the daughter of immigrant parents and I will tell you they took the time, they paid the price to come here legally. We are a country of immigrants, but more importantly we are a country of laws. When we give up being a country of laws, we give up everything this country was founded on.
“There are numerous stories of people who came here illegally that have sad stories about having to go back, but when we start giving up being that country of laws, we’re going to all fall apart. We’ve got to continue that. And our illegal immigration law was to protect everybody in South Carolina – employers, citizens – to make sure we have the people here that deserve to be here. And we want legal immigrants. We just don’t want illegal immigrants.”
Days before South Carolina voters head to the polls, the race for the Palmetto State now appears to be tightening. An 18-percent lead for Romney two weeks ago has been cut to 10 percent in the latest CNN poll, making Saturday’s primary a potential nail-biter.
After all, the winner of South Carolina’s primary has gone on to become the Republican Party’s nominee in the past 30 years. For people like Juarez, saying there is a lot at stake in these elections is an understatement . Just ask her young cousin, whose mother is now thousands of miles away back in Guatemala.
Matthew Jaffe is covering the 2012 campaign for ABC News and Univision.

Email
Republicans Duke it Out in Arizona
Rick Santorum Defends Earmarks
While the plight of illegals is sad, the Hispanic vote should not even be a factor if legal Hispanics care about being an American citizen. They need to follow laws, not create them, and be the best citizens possible. Why are illegals expecting citizenship rights? They are creating the conditions here that they fled from. The U.S. has a right to CHOOSE its citizens as much as Mexico, France, Germany, England, Switzerland, etc.–illegals don’t have the RIGHT to choose anything here. Mexico kicks out illegals, duh!
Posted by: jonnie | January 20, 2012, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Probably not enough wealthy Latinos to make it worth the Republicans time and effort.
Posted by: pksk531 | January 20, 2012, 11:54 am 11:54 am
there are plenty of legal latino voters who support the immigration bill and the republican party. its the llegals that are complaining and as far as i know they dont vote …legally that is. this is why obama is against voter id being required. while sympathetic on the surface they are illegal. try joining an indian tribe..they will let you know who is illegal. try working in mexico sometime.
Posted by: catman | January 20, 2012, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Illegal Immigrants do not take jobs from Americans? Nothing can be further from the truth. Per the Bureau of Labor Statistics Unemployment Report of January 6, 2012:
Farming, fishing, forestry occupations = 18.2% Unemployment
Construction, extraction occupations = 16.4% Unemployment
Production occupations = 10.7% Unemployment
Transportation, material moving occupations = 10.1% Unemployment
Service occupations = 9.3% Unemployment
Total Adjusted US Unemployed Citizens and Legal Residents = 13,097,000
This figure and the above rates exclude 6,385,000 Persons who want a job but are left out of the above statistics for various reasons.
Total Number of Americans Looking for Work = 19,482,000
That means real unemployment rates for the occupations above are actually 49% larger when you include excluded people.
Pew Center estimates indicate 7.5 million Illegal Immigrants work in the USA. A Pew study “estimated that illegal immigrants fill a quarter of all agricultural jobs, 17 percent of office and house cleaning positions, 14 percent of construction jobs and 12 percent in food preparation.” That means 75 percent of all agricultural jobs, 83 percent of cleaning positions, 86 percent of construction jobs and 88 percent of the food preparation jobs are done by American Workers. These professions are where unemployment is worst for Americans.
Meanwhile Management, professional, and related occupations where few Illegal Immigrants work has a 4.2% Unemployment rate.
This disparity existed before 2007 so it cannot be blamed on the Recession. If Illegal Immigrants do not take jobs from American Workers how come unemployment is the highest in jobs where most Illegal Immigrants work?
Posted by: Norski | January 20, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Both of my parents are legal immigrants and came to this country through the legal process. What I don’t understand is why a mother would leave her child behind. If the child was born in the US, he has a birth certificate and can come back anytime while she gets her papers in order. It doesn’t matter whether someone has been here 25 years or 1 day. Everyone needs to go through the legal process to be here legally.
Posted by: Patricia | January 20, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
To stop President Obama and his Liberal progressive Czars as Eric Holder, the only avenue is to elect strict TEA PARTY Constitutionalists in oncoming federal and state elections. There are two points to remember that entering the United States has been intentionally classed by Congress as a civil matter? That it is not classified as a Felony; as it should be? Although being hired for a job or using a stolen ID or another person’s Social Security card can be prosecuted as a felony, as they have committed two crimes. The Tea Party will rescind any covert amnesties, sanctuary city ordinances, chain migration, dream act, and additionally overhaul federal spending. Become acquainted NumbersUSA and learn about the billions of dollars taken from taxpayers in unfunded mandates by pandering to illegal aliens. This is labeled as a “Backdoor Amnesty.” Washington must enact ‘The Legal Workforce Act ‘Known more commonly as Mandated E-Verify. Plus “The Birthright Citizenship Act” to stop the inducement of bring unborn infants into the country, that provides free welfare, education and health care. WE THE PEOPLE’S Constitution is under siege by the resident government and must be stopped, when they are allowing illegal aliens back on the streets. BE WARNED THAT NON-CITIZENS HAVE BEEN VOTING AND CERTAINLY WILL AGAIN IN FUTURE ELECTIONS.
Posted by: Dave Francis | January 20, 2012, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
SC Uses Diebold Black Box Voting State Wide! National Security Lab Hacks Diebold Touch-Screen Voting Machine by Remote Control With $26 in Computer Parts: EXCLUSIVE story at Salon. Diebold machine uses standard mini-bar key found everywhere! Florida ditches Diebold after numerous voting irregularities and now uses verifiable paper ballets!
Posted by: Bryan Black | January 21, 2012, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm