Feb 7, 2012 3:42pm

Navy SEAL Commander Advised to ‘Get the Hell Out of the Media’

ap Special Operations McRaven nt 120207 wblog Navy SEAL Commander Advised to Get the Hell Out of the Media

Charles Dharapak/AP Photo

A retired general today assailed the commander of the Navy SEAL raid that killed Osama bin Laden for drawing too much media attention to operations that he argued should be kept under wraps.

Special Operations Commander Adm. Bill McRaven was confronted by retired Lt. Gen. James Vaught, who said he didn’t understand why the recent raids by the Navy SEALs, such as the one to kill Osama bin Laden or to rescue U.S. hostage Jessica Buchanan, were all over the media.

“Since the time when your wonderful team went and drug bin Laden out and got rid of him, and more recently when you went down and rescued the group in Somalia, or wherever the hell they were, they’ve been splashing all of this all over the media,” Vaught, 85, said. “I flat don’t understand that.

“Now back when my special operators extracted Saddam [Hussein] from the hole, we didn’t say one damn word about it,” he continued. “We turned him over to the local commander and told him to claim that his forces drug him out of the hole, and he did so. And we just faded away and kept our mouth shut.

“Now I’m going to tell you, one of these days, if you keep publishing how you do this, the other guy’s going to be there ready for you, and you’re going to fly in and he’s going to shoot down every damn helicopter and kill every one of your SEALs. Now, watch it happen. Mark my words. Get the hell out of the media,” he concluded, as laughter broke out at a meeting of the National Defense Industrial Association in Washington, D.C.

 

gty navy seals raid wy 120207 wblog Navy SEAL Commander Advised to Get the Hell Out of the Media

In this photo provided by the U.S. Navy, Navy SEALs enter a simulated home while practicing close-quarters combat at U.S. Training Center Moyock, Nov. 4, 2010, in Moyock, N.C. (Eddie Harrison/US Navy via Getty Images)

Vaught commanded the failed mission to rescue the hostages in Iran in 1979. Eight service members died and four were injured in “Operation Eagle Claw” when the helicopters on the mission collided in the remote Iranian desert. Vaught, whose role made him the first commander of Delta Force, was not active duty during the Hussein raid, which was also conducted by the Delta Force, the secretive counterterrorism unit.

McRaven jokingly responded that he became a Navy SEAL because his sister was dating a special forces member and because he was infatuated with John Wayne’s movie, “The Green Beret.”

“The fact of the matter is, there have always been portrayals of SOF [Special Operations Forces] out in the mainstream media,” he said. “We are in an environment today where we can’t get away from it. It is not something that we actively pursue, as I think a number of the journalists here in the audience will confirm. But the fact of the matter is, with the social media being what it is today, with the press and the 24-hour news cycle, it’s very difficult to get away from it.”

He added that it was difficult to avoid media coverage in today’s 24-hour news cycle and that it could actually help Navy SEALs do their job better.

“We have had a few failures. And I think having those failures exposed in the media also kind of helps focus our attention, helps us do a better job. So sometimes the criticism … the spotlight on us actually makes us better,” McRaven said.

The Navy SEALs have received heavy media attention in the past year thanks to the bin Laden raid and the rescue in Somalia. A movie titled “Act for Valor” focusing on the elite special operations force is due for release next month and Academy Award-winning director Kathryn Bigelow is making a movie about the raid that killed the world’s most wanted man.

McRaven was in Washington, D.C., today talking about an expansion in the role of special operations forces in Afghanistan. Special operations troops, McRaven said, would likely be the last to leave the country and the Pentagon is even considering a new special operations command, but that has not been decided yet.

“I have no doubt that special operations will be the last to leave Afghanistan,” McRaven said. “As far as anything beyond that, we’re exploring a lot of options.”

ABC News’ Meg Fowler contributed to this report.

SHOWS:

User Comments

It’s all political, this President runs this country by what will get him re-elected, not what is best for the country.

Posted by: Freedom | February 7, 2012, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

You must be very desparate to say something negative about the President. This story doesn’t mention him but you respond with right wing hate speech anyway. Tottally pathetic. See a therapist and soon. Ask him about anger management and bigotry control.

Posted by: Mikeyboy | February 7, 2012, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

It’s about time someone said this. I have wondered why we keep putting this information in the public for a long time. If it is secret than don’t let the media know.

Posted by: Seriously | February 7, 2012, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

A retired general whose claim to fame is that he was in command of the failed mission to rescue the hostages in Iran in 1979 when eight service members died and four were injured and that he wasn’t in command of the successful mission to find Saddam Hussein in 2003. With a record like that you’d think he’d shut up.

Posted by: 2hundredthousand | February 7, 2012, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

“Vaught commanded the failed mission to rescue the hostages in Iran in 1979.”

Operation Eagle Claw was attempted on 24-25 April 1980.

“when the helicopters on the mission collided in the remote Iranian desert.”

One RH-53D, helo #3, collided with a C-130.

Posted by: A.A. Cunningham | February 7, 2012, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Fact is that the bad guys watch the news too. If they know how youre going to come at them it’ll make taking down the next Arch-scumbag a lot tougher to do.

Posted by: Coggs | February 7, 2012, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

If Vaught was in charge of Eagle Claw I can see how he’d be green with envy of Neptune Spear. Neptune Spear was basically Eagle Claw, but planned and executed competently. Vaught’s mission pretty much lost a President re-election. McRaven’s mission successfully brought justice to all hurt by 9/11.

Maybe Vaught ought to get the h– out of the media?

Posted by: Danny | February 7, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

There is an old saying for the World Wars…Loose lips, sink ships.

Posted by: Tim C | February 7, 2012, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

I grew up practicing to hide under a stupid desk in case of a nuclear missile attack from the then USSR. Like that was really going to help save my butt. I also remember hearing, but not hearing about what our security forces were going. It was then widely understood that there were security for “TOP SECRET” missions. That is, until the 60′s when all the media wanted transparency. So, we sat at in our living rooms and at our kitchen tables watching the Vietnam War; and, hating our military for being there. Like Danny quotes: “Loose lips, sink ships.” We don’t need to know. Only that our government is doing whatever it takes to keep our country safe, while enriching the wealthy and their special interest.

Posted by: Joe Allard | February 7, 2012, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

This coming from the guy who messed up the Iran raid. I’m thinking mabey he should shut up/

Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | February 7, 2012, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

It’s all political, this President runs this country by what will get him re-elected, not what is best for the country.
I agree with you FREEDOM. But instead of saying Obama RUNS the country, I think you should have said Obama RUEINS the country. That’s more apprropiate when taking about Obama.

Posted by: Zman | February 7, 2012, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

“Drug” is not the past tense of “drag”. It is dragged. He must be from the south.

Posted by: A.D.DiSorda | February 7, 2012, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

““Now I’m going to tell you, one of these days, if you keep publishing how you do this, the other guy’s going to be there ready for you, and you’re going to fly in and he’s going to shoot down every damn helicopter and kill every one of your SEALs. Now, watch it happen.” Someone in the White House is desperate to have a checkmark in the positive column and needs all the positive publicity he can get. You know Obamacare just ain’t working out like promised.

Posted by: deanbob | February 7, 2012, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Obama has done an outstanding job with the Navy SEALs but I understand their need for privacy. I think bringing some of these operations to light has helped us appreciate our military that much more and those who lead them.

Posted by: tstorm | February 7, 2012, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

You folks take shots at a man that was in charge of one of the best Counter terrorism units in the world, over one mission in his long and successful career. This man is a hero. He did something most people could never do or want to do. Just like many missions in the Special Operations world, you mostly hear of the missions that go wrong, very few of the ones that go well. Trying to lay blame on one man for a crash far from the main objective is crazy. They crashed during the bin laden raid but they were already at the objective, if they would have crashed miles away they would have canceled the mission, just like in Iran. Special operation world is a very close knit community and a man of his status in that kind of world knows plenty about the missions they accomplish, so he has the right to comment about what they do and what they have done. If you ask every operator, I’m willing to bet almost all of them will tell you they prefer to stay out of the media due to the possibility of the enemy obtaining information about the way they operate and use it against them. Just because the regular folks think they should know about every mission because it’s cool doesn’t make it right. It puts future missions and operators in danger. Please sign up and go through the training if you want to know about the missions or how they operate. You also have to remember that members of the team that got Bin Laden were worried about the safety of their family due to the media.

Posted by: Erik | February 7, 2012, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Guess what hit’em in Iran!? A sandstorm. In Abbotabad, Team 6 was lucky to loose a chopper without casualties. What about the 28 who’s chinook was shot down last year? Whether the missions are successful or not, these guys are heroes coz they go prepared to be tortured, injured, killed or victorious without the media. Can any of us jump on the local bus knowing its goin to come under heavy fire three blocks ahead? I didn’t think so. The general knows what he’s talking about. Excessive commentary by attention seeking officers can only add to the list of risks involved.

Posted by: Dr. Dokta | February 7, 2012, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Hell, Obama has to say it in the media to show what he has accomplished. Otherwise, the word will be that he wasn’t President at all. Just like he didn’t go to Harvard and is not a citizen. Maybe if racism didn’t play sucha role in the U.S. we could stop politicing and get down to what will advance our nation. Instead the President has to make all the decisions with no help from the congress, and yet he is blamed that nothing is better…. even when it is!

Imagine if you were going to the press about decisions your bosses made. How long do you think you would be in your position? Just like our enlisted must take orders and go to false wars, so shall their leaders do what they are told and discuss it in private if they disagree!

Posted by: Dennis | February 7, 2012, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

@Erik

Seems to me this man is out there taking potshots at a man who IS in charge of one of the best Counter terrorism units in the world. A unit who recently killed Osama Bin Laden under his command. Seems to me the man is publicly accusing him McRaven of not doing his job, in front of the media. Seems to me that man better be able to take it if he’s able to dish it out.

Posted by: Danny | February 7, 2012, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

IMHO, this has everything to do with the egomania that is Obama.

Posted by: jayz43 | February 7, 2012, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

We live in obummernation! It’s not about the SOF or the SEALs or rescuing of hostages or killing the terrorists. It’s about the obummer. obummer needs, wants, credit wherever credit is lurking, hiding. He will expose it and he will take it, the credit not his due. The entitlement president. The obummer entitlement president. We are disgusted. Utterly disgusted.

Posted by: mahnaz | February 7, 2012, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I agree this man seems to be green with envy over the fact that this commander is in front of the media after two very successful missions while his claim to fame was a failure. however, I do agree that the current commander is grand standing which flies in the face of the entire idea that everything about the Navy Seals are secret . That said, i see nothing here about Obama, so do not understand where that commentary string is coming from.

Posted by: pksk531 | February 7, 2012, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

The SEALs are an unfortunate propaganda tool for this egotistic President we have. Now having worked around the SEALs for 20 years I know they LOVE the media, so I guess this is a perfect match. LOL!
GEN Vaughn is correct in what he says, “best be careful advertising yourselves”. Also, to correct the article…. COL Charlie Beckwith was the first Commander of Delta (Open source). If you all only knew 10% of the stuff that has gone on in the shadows.

Posted by: ARMY_SF_RET | February 7, 2012, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

During Operation Just Cause, the SEALs were sent against Manuel Noriega’s hangared airplane… a totally pointless and stupid mission/target that could have been accomplished much more practically and safely by any one of the numerous AC-130 Gunships that were in the air, armed and engaging throughout Panama City that night. These Generals all want a piece of the pie. SEALS died and were wounded for no good reason. The media had nothing to do with it, but I have always suspected that the Os who sent them were thinking of the glory. When they have a real target, with a real purpose, so what if they get publicity? It is stupid missions and questionable objectives that will get them hurt.

Posted by: Happyfrenchman | February 7, 2012, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Vaught is correct!

Posted by: irishrose | February 7, 2012, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

yaAWwnn!! Anyone with the latest on Tim Pawlenty???

Posted by: Sealot | February 7, 2012, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I understand his point, but what crucial information was let out? I don’t recall much other than the mere fact of those two operations happening. How would anything that was reported about those two acts jeopardize the safety of the Seals on future missions? I fail to see that.

I see no harm having been done. Us regular Joe Schmoe public will never know the true “details” of those operations, and that’s how it should be. Navy Seals are a special elite group of people and we’ll continue to find out after the fact about their missions.

Posted by: Brian | February 7, 2012, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Operational secrecy is essential to individual survival and team success in special operations.
As a Navy Vietnam veteran, I was shocked and dismayed to read the recent media story about the new SEAL “mothership” USS Ponce for example. What happened to the “need to know” concept?
The only source of “news” about the U.S. military should be generated by DOD. No other “news” about any aspect of the military should be allowed by law. War and military operations are not conducted for entertainment or political benefit. The First Amendment does not apply to the military,
The Uniform Code of Military Justice does.

Posted by: Crusader | February 7, 2012, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Ask military historians or actual military commanders about Operation Eagle Claw. Commanders of all branches of the military were more than eager to carry out the operation to have their 15 minutes of fame. Perhaps GEN Vaught was a glory hound himself.

I don’t disagree with him completely about keeping quiet about operations. But, the media isn’t getting the full story to the point that we’re compromising SOF units with publicity. No harm, no foul.

And it’s truly amazing people are painting the UBL operation into some sort of political game. UBL’s death is good for all Americans. Your pious and haughty claims are not.

Posted by: ZOMGZ | February 7, 2012, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

POSTED BY: ZOMGZ | FEBRUARY 7, 2012, 10:21 PM 10:21 PM, what about this administration turning over classified material to the Hollywood producer for the movie. Or was it payback for reelection donations from the Hollywood crowd.

Posted by: Lizzie | February 7, 2012, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Seals = glory hounds and the focus of military wannabe star$#@!%$ers….just like this new propaganda movie coming out. Recruiting scam for kids that will wind up cooks,supply,mechanics,corrosion control you get the idea….thats the truth.PERIOD.

Notice all the engineers and scientists and how they got that technology that actually makes these hero worship missions possible will never see the light of day because it is the tech folks and those people creating the real surge weapons had help from a distance *wink*wink*………….

Posted by: shawn | February 8, 2012, 12:00 am 12:00 am

It is all being done with technology that we didn’t actually invent. That is a fact and a crushing one at that you people have no idea what kind of scam you have fallen for and how used up and worthless the cannon fodder is viewed. I wish to god the truth would come out but people would leap off buildings once the truth came out and they put two and two together.

Posted by: shawn | February 8, 2012, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Exactly right. Why on earth would filmmaker Kathryn Bigelow be given security clearance to view some of our most important national secrets? For some stupid movie that was originally going to be released this fall, right before the elections, until House Republicans called out Obama on his blatant abuse of power for personal gain. Do we not recall members of SEAL Team 6 finally having to ask the media to back off? McRaven himself complained the White House kept leaking sensitive information to the media. Obama saw the operation as a pr bonanza first, last, and always.

Posted by: J | February 8, 2012, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Vaught was tight lipped about any mission. Quite often, my team would be enplace for days at a time just waitnig for the go-word. If it came, one or two shots and we disappeared. If stand-down, we just faded away. The only mention we ever made was to tell family that we were Stand-down/Safe. Now my son has been there and the only thing that made me mad was a news story about what his team did. His team has now been split / reassigned because a reporter gave out every members name/position. Worse is the picture of him. Media will get them killed.

Posted by: NCO Retired | February 8, 2012, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I actually thought Vaught might have something worthwhile to say until I read the part about him being 85 years old and former head of the failed Iran rescue operation.

Posted by: SpinDoctor | February 8, 2012, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Never discuss a successful mission; it reduces the chances of using that tactic again and puts those soldiers at risk of retribution. Never gloat or brag about killing; War is not a spectator sport. War and killing is a vile necessity; not something to boast about. We who defend your freedom do so only with the knowledge that we did what we had to do and it was not to be glorified for. RSP CDR USN (ret)

Posted by: RSP | February 8, 2012, 2:48 am 2:48 am

As someone already pointed out, Col Charlie Beckwith was the first commander of 1st Special Operations Command, SFOD. General Vaught WAS the overall commander of Operation Eagle Claw. He had NO special operations background prior to taking the position. It was considered a potential promotion plum that he wrangled for. He was also the one that let it become a multi-service operation where the Navy, Air Force and Marines, with no experience working the tasking, jumped into the operation. Not knocking the other services which do a superlative job, special operations-wise, now.

Posted by: tacticalguy | February 8, 2012, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Why is an 85 year old retired military man telling anyone to do anything? Who is he to call a press conference to tell someone else to stay out of the media? Politics maybe? yup. I’ve seen a whole lot of armchair war mongering by over the hill “EX” military trying to relive their old glory days. I don’t think I’ve ever seen so many 80 + year old men sporting military baseball caps around town as I’ve seen in the last ten years. It’s time to stop the wars. We cannot afford the unlimited funding for the war machine. It’s time to build hospitals and schools NOT bombs and bullets. Bring the kids home and spend the money on programs for them for their exemplary service protecting our country. Boeing, Halliburton and all the other corporations making billions off of wars will have to find something socially positive to do that is not dependent on tax payer dollars. We cannot kill an ideology by blowing up cities. We can destroy a terrorist group by seeking them out and killing the leadership. In that regard, we are on the right track.

Posted by: dan | February 8, 2012, 4:20 am 4:20 am

Vaught is 1000% correct. There is a vast difference between what is the movies and real life. The bad guys are not stupid and know that so tend to disregard what is in the movies except for entertainment. McRaven does not get the point that whatever he says is out in the open where the bad guys can study what he says. The best policy for the military guys to follow, except for the PR guys, is to just put a zipper on their mouths when talking to the media. Proof? Remember Patton? Remember McCystal?

Posted by: Bob Ramos | February 8, 2012, 4:32 am 4:32 am

I agree with Vaught ……… its like they are advertising and looking for work. This publicity campaign is dangerous , showing off their super duper skills in this dangerous world is nonsense , maybe some group will decide to compete with them by killing or kidnapping some of the good guys ….too much talk not enough thinking

Posted by: ghent1944 | February 8, 2012, 4:54 am 4:54 am

The Commander-In-Chief was the worst offender. Do the math. Do we blame middle management when a corporate deal sours? Nope. We go straight to the top where the responsibility rests.

Posted by: Banderman | February 8, 2012, 5:03 am 5:03 am

Gen Vaught is correct and his concerns are real.

Adm. McRaven’s reply was lame, perhaps reflecting the current lame political mindset being directed by the Obama “leadership”.,

Posted by: norry | February 8, 2012, 5:08 am 5:08 am

Eagle Claw failed because Jimma Catta had his incompetent hands around it — push -push – do this, make me a hero so I will get re-elected. He didnt stand back and let the military call the shots – or call it off. Vaught is right. Get out of the news. Does McRaven not know the meaning of “covert”.

Posted by: Susan Harms | February 8, 2012, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Blame the media General or are you just a little ticked that it was not the Army that did the deed. The SEALs are very upset that the media spilled their guts to the public and ruined intelligence gathered when they did their job. Years of hard work went down the drain by the blabber mouth media. Same logic applies to publishing to the world we broke the Japanese code during WW II.

Posted by: Francliff | February 8, 2012, 8:29 am 8:29 am

There has always been media publishing details that they shouldn’t because we live in a country of free speech. It is simply one of those small negatives that go along with a positive.

Posted by: Librarian53 | February 8, 2012, 9:30 am 9:30 am

This is why US Army Special Operators (SF and Delta) are called quiet professionals.

And why SEALs aren’t.

Posted by: jts | February 8, 2012, 9:46 am 9:46 am

I feel deeply about this, I wish our government should put into law, that you are not to open your darm mouth to the world IN ANY WAY OR FORM, about things you know of our military systems or what, how, when, we did something to this effect on sensative operations, if you talk about this to the out side world, your military pension and all benefits are cancel and a court marshal is installed againce you, period.
IT PUTS OUR SERVICE MEN AND WOMEN IN DEEP JEOPARDY….

Posted by: allen | February 8, 2012, 10:43 am 10:43 am

To those that criticize the General’s record. There is no earthly way you can know what his entire record is because he (and his people) kept quiet about it and that is the way it should be. Whether he admits it or not, McRaven is just tooting his own horn. McRaven’s example is way off the mark. The bad guys regard the “John Wayne” movies as entertainment but they regard any intel from folks like McRaven as valid intel to be pieced together with other tibets to make up some very real intel. McRaven should not be in the media any longer.

Posted by: Bob Ramos | February 8, 2012, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Ok, so you are all bashing an old general and our President when in fact the real monger here is the main stream media itself! Whether or not the US government released details of the Bin Laden raid, there was still some knucklehead in the neighborhood that posted a tweet, a facebook post, or sent a text to a news outlet about it and within minutes became world wide news. With the invention of social media and the internet, I don’t see how the government could keep missions secret these days. It only takes one by-standard watching from the sidelines with a blackberry to create a world wide news story within 90 seconds.

Posted by: Manda | February 8, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I have to agree that way too much information about the raid was leaked, perhaps this was intentional to stem a backlash from the right who would claim that it never occurred as with the “birthers”. Nevertheless, one thing stands out and that is the Pakistani doctor who organized a vaccination scheme to obtain DNA from the compound occupants. This detail should have never been released as it has put him in grave danger, What strikes me though is the secrecy about the rest of the advance observer team who certainly had to be in place, on the ground weeks before and then having to escape likely by ground, destroying equipment and evidence as this was unfolding,

Posted by: JamaicaJoe | February 8, 2012, 11:10 am 11:10 am

I agree, we need to stop promoting the detail success of Navy Seals, Delta Force and other SOF operations. Unfortunately, this administration is milking the military success greatly for their benefit, however, they are being irresponsible. If you want to promote the success of a SOF operation, that is fine, but providing detail information is not necessary. Simple statements such as, “Today, SOF successfully located and nuetralized wanted terrorist (so and so), there were no American causalties.” Americans, and the world and our enemies need not know how an operation was committed but that the operation was successful. Look back at Mogodesia, Black Hawk Down. The reason why that situation occurred was due to the fact that the political powers demanded that operations be committed in the daytime all the time, in order to provide the press with great footage. The political powers refuse to provide gunship coverage and coverge from the SPECTR aircraft as well, claiming it would be an “over use of force.” Finally, the politically powers refused to allow the ground commanders to change their tactics, allowing the enemy to figure out the pattern, the timing and ability of the drop forces. Now you have the political powers promoting and providing detail information to the press, to our enemies on how the SEALs and SOF are successfully eliiminating their organizations. SOF operators do not want nor desire the public eye, they merely want to complete the mission and continue to do the job they do so well. Presidents Obama, future Presidents, politicians and the press must realize that secrets are necessary and how SOF operates is a secret that needs to be kept, not publized in the press around the world.

Posted by: William | February 8, 2012, 11:34 am 11:34 am

The laughter of the audience is a testimony to their ignorance or their desire to praise Obama, even if it causes the death of our service men, including the Seals.
Remember today.
The errors of command cost 21 Seals their lives recently in Afganastan.
We are talking about human lives, not votes.

Posted by: The Old Lieutenant | February 8, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Nonsense for starters-and what does this have to do with the content of this article anyway?

As for the actual article, let me understand this-a man in charge of a failed mission doesn’t want successful missions to be in the limelight? I’ve read some of what’s been written about recent successes and nothing I read wiould be of any help in interferring a Seal team trying to do their job.

Posted by: EarGrayHot | February 8, 2012, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

It’s true, the SEALs and their operations are being outed way too often – the general public doesn’t need to know (nor should they care) WHO or HOW, they just should know that some part of the military got bin laden / killed somalian pirates / rescued prisoners, etc.

Furthermore, the fact that DEVGRU operations are being detailed in the media on a regular basis is sickening.

Loose lips sink ships indeed, or in Afghanistan’s case they cause a chinook filled to the brim with special operators to be shot down and killed. KEEP A LID ON IT.

Posted by: iceveiled | February 8, 2012, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Alright ladies and gentlemen, LT Gen Vaught merely expressed what the rest of our active duty SOF brothers (from the bottom to the very top) cannot express to the media. The target of Vaught and the rest of SOF’s true disdain are the members of our Executive Branch and other elected officials in DC who leak classified information on a routine basis for their own personal gain or their party’s benefit. By sharing SOF warriors’ identities, tactics, techniques and procedures to the world puts the lives of our warrior/protectors, their families and the rest of our nation at much greater risk. A watered down recruiting video or movie is a legitimate tool to increase our numbers, but the stupid, selfish, shortsighted and dangerous release of operational secrets for political gain is criminal. Frog out!

Posted by: FROG | February 9, 2012, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

I believe the the retired general is correct. I do not need to know how they operate and what missions they do, I am just glad they are there.

The failed escape attempt in Iran showed that there was/is a need for well trained special operators hence the development of Delta Force under General Vaught. He did not claim to lead the operation that grabbed Sadam. I believe when he is saying his special operators, it is in a proud papa(papa of Delta Force) kind of way not in he’s on the ground leading the charge kind of way.

It is far better that they stay the boogeyman to all the bad guys out there and not trot them out in the spotlight. The boogeyman is not as scary when the lights are on.

Posted by: Cal | February 9, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Just glad they are on our side….’nough said.

Posted by: EngageGrayMatter | February 10, 2012, 11:50 am 11:50 am

seals keep their mouth shut by following orders , its people with less skin in the game that want to belong. show the seals and others proper respect.

Posted by: bruce | February 11, 2012, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

This dodo needs to shut his yap and play it cool. So he is now recognizable and anybody seen with him will now be followed and identified. God help us if that person is a Seal because he is now compromised all because this idiot had the need to brag about himself. Obama, Pentagon..fire or retire this idiot. His brain has gone to sleep and won’t wake up.

Posted by: fandango | February 12, 2012, 1:18 am 1:18 am

@DeanBob….this really has nothing to do with the White House. This idiot is going to find out that loose lips not only sink ships, they also sink careers. I can’t imagine any president, let alone Obama, who likes to play things close to the vest, is happy about this self-promoting egomaniac coming out and ID’ing himself for all to know his face and associate him with the Seals. Any Seal caught in his company will then be easily identified and anyone he is around is easily id’d, and so on and so forth. What a jerk!

Posted by: fandango | February 12, 2012, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Be outstanding but never stand out.

Posted by: velvers | February 12, 2012, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Vaught is correct. People can joke about it and play off the writers mention about a failed mission, which we have all had, but the fact remains that putting this in the media will get our people killed. They all, from the top down need to knock it off. Just shut up and do the job. That includes shutting off Hollywood.

Posted by: USA | March 6, 2012, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.