Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On Sandra Fluke, Offering ‘As Much Aspirin to Put Between Her Knees As She Wants’

(Image Credit: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
ABC News’ Alexa Keyes reports:
The social issues debate re-ignited on Capitol Hill today when senators killed a proposal to throw out President Obama’s contraception mandate. Conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh was thrust into the center of the debate after he called the woman who was denied the right to speak on the controversial all-male conception panel at a hearing last month a “slut” on his show Wednesday. The issue heated up more today when Limbaugh took his comments even further.
The conservative radio host’s remarks sparked an angry backlash from House Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California and Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. But instead of heeding their requests for an apology, Limbaugh doubled down against what he called the “conniption fit” of the House Democrats.
Echoing Foster Friess, the single largest donor to the pro- Rick Santorum’s super PAC, Limbaugh said that he would “happily buy [Fluke] all the aspirin she wants.”
Limbaugh was referencing the comment Friess made in February when he said the “gals” in “his day” put aspirin between their legs in lieu of contraception. Limbaugh then expanded his offer to include the university’s entire female student body.
“I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want,” he said.
Sandra Fluke, a third-year student at Georgetown University Law School, was barred from testifying by Rep. Darrell Issa, the committee chair at the faith-based hearing on Capitol Hill, because he deemed her unqualified. Issa said the panel was supposed to focus on religious freedom and Fluke is not a member of any clergy.
She eventually spoke to a Democratic hearing spearheaded by Pelosi on Feb. 23, where she talked about the need for birth control coverage. Fluke spoke of one friend in particular who needed contraception to prevent ovarian cysts.
Rush Limbaugh, though, had a different take on Fluke’s testimony. On his show Wednesday, he suggested that the reason Fluke cannot afford birth control is because she is having too much sex.
“Can you imagine if you’re her parents how proud of Sandra Fluke you would be?” he said. “Your daughter…testifies she’s having so much sex she can’t afford her own birth control pills and she agrees that Obama should provide them, or the pope.”
Fluke testified that without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman as much as $3,000 during law school.
“Three thousand dollars for birth control in three years? That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex — and, she wants us to pay for it,” Limbaugh said, adding that high school boys applying to college should consider Georgetown. “They’re admitting before congressional committee that they’re having so much sex they can’t afford the birth control pills!”
The conservative radio host continued: “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
Limbaugh shied away from his word choice towards the end of his show, saying “So, she’s not a slut. She’s round-heeled. I take it back.” Round-heeled, though, is a euphemism for the same thing, an old-fashioned term for a “promiscuous woman.”
On today’s show, Limbaugh turned up the heat and suggested that women who use insurance-covered birth control should post sex tapes online: “So Miss Fluke, and the rest of you Feminazis, here’s the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch,” he said.
Limbaugh’s comments today came on the same day of the rejection of the “Blunt Amendment,” which would have repealed Obama’s controversial contraception rule.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee drafted a petition today to ask Republican leaders to denounce Limbaugh’s “repulsive attacks on women,” DCCC spokesman Jesse Ferguson said.
“When it comes to Limbaugh,” Ferguson said, “expect the unexpected. But what should be expected is for Republican leaders to stand up and say they don’t want him to defend them anymore.”
More than 75 Democratic House Members signed a letter to House Speaker John Boehner on Thursday urging him to condemn Limbaugh’s remarks. Read the DCCC’s letter to Speaker Boehner here. And here is the list of signatures the petition has received so far.
UPDATE 5:11 p.m.: For her part, Fluke released a statement thanking those who went to bat on her behalf and condemning the remarks, though she did not call out anyone by name.
“We are fortunate to live in a democracy where everyone is entitled to their own opinions regarding legitimate policy differences. Unfortunately, numerous commentators have gone far beyond the acceptable bounds of civil discourse,” Fluke wrote. ”No woman deserves to be disrespected in this manner. This language is an attack on all women, and has been used throughout history to silence our voices. The millions of American women who have and will continue to speak out in support of women’s health care and access to contraception prove that we will not be silenced.”
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
She’s a slut. How dare this young slut want everyone else to pay for her birth control. This is how the left is trying to destroy morals in this country. The gates of hell have opened and the left came out.
Posted by: dan | March 1, 2012, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
This is the kind of thing from the right that turns off Americans.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
$3k a year for birth control? This girl must be doing some freaky stuff and no way should we the tax payer cover her lifestyle.
Posted by: Jared | March 1, 2012, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
If she had a monogamous relationship and only had sex once a month the cost of birth control pills would be the same.
Better that abortions be performed?
This is slander and nonsense and he should be ashamed of himself. The above comment that parrot’s this hate speak (in all capital letters) comes from the kind of person who makes me ashamed to be an American.
Posted by: Greg | March 1, 2012, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I am cracking up that there is actually a woman – smart enough to get into law school – who is willing to publicly testify she needs someone to pay for her condoms … that she must purchase so many that she can no longer afford to pay for them herself, or that she won’t just walk over to the clinic and pick some up for herself. Aghh! She makes women look so stupid and dependent on others! I hate it when this happens.
Posted by: Lexi | March 1, 2012, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Leave it to Limbaugh to conflate health care with promiscuous sex. Idiot Limbaugh does not even know how the pill works and assumes you need to take more BC pills when you engage in more sex. He thinks the pill is a spermicide. And he willfully rejects any evidence that the pill has medicinal value beyond contraception. A woman who needs BC pills to control the growth of painful and potentially life threatening ovarian cysts is just a slut in his eyes. Never mind those cysts reduce her chances of motherhood which probably weighs heavily on her. No, she’s just a sex addict and a person of no virtue and deserving of his contempt. Like pretty much any person who does not make 30 million a year. He is an odious and hideous tool. How he sleeps at night is more than I can comprehend. This from the man who condemned drug users to death all while popping 30 or more Oxycontin pills per day and pimping out his maid to get them for him.
Posted by: Ed | March 1, 2012, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
What ever happened to inexpensive condoms at CVS? ONE DOLLAR A CONDOM. Why spend so much. If you’re having such a hard time paying for all of this while in college, then stop having sex! I’m 18 and a freshman in college saying this.
Posted by: Larry | March 1, 2012, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
A slut AND a prostitute. I guess it takes one to know one.
Posted by: sameagain | March 1, 2012, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Why doesn’t her professor pay for the contraception?
Posted by: David Webb | March 1, 2012, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Better be careful ‘fat man’…Breitbart met his maker today. Who knows, maybe we’ll be lucky and your number will come up next. I really hope so. People like you are the kind of jerks that have turned politics into the divisive mess it is.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
i dont care what you do with your life as long as it doesnt impact mine. I WOULD NEVER PAY FOR MY DAUGHHTERS PILLS WHY WOULD I PAY FOR YOURS? you dems think your so smart yo are actually on the wrong side of this issue because moms and dads are conservative when it comes to their kids. why dont you all go and apologize to terrorists or build them soccer fields but pay for your own darn health care and sex care.
Posted by: catman | March 1, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I’m trying to think of one woman I know who would go before the public and state she needed thousands of dollars worth of birth control every year. I can’t name one. America’s youth used to fight for things like civil rights, now they demand everyone else pay for them to have fun. What a sad generation.
Posted by: Tim | March 1, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
What is it with the republicans, always bashing any women that comes forward? Are you all sure you’re no from the Middle East. Maybe we should take her out and stone her.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Sandra, get yourself an attorney. And it doesn’t have to be an expensive one. You have been defamed by Rush Limbaugh. For all his bluster, he doesn’t actually cross the line very often. But this is one of those occasions when he, who knows better, has deliberately misrepresented the character of a private citizen. Good luck.
Posted by: GB in NY | March 1, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Okay, that is $3,000 over THREE YEARS. Less than $100 a month. And NO it does not mean she is having a lot of sex. You must take the pill continuously, every day, or you can can pregnant. For a student, that $100 a month can be a lot of money. You do not now why she takes it, there are many medical reasons women take the pill, not just to prevent pregnancy. ” Fluke spoke of one friend in particular who needed contraception to prevent ovarian cysts.” THE RUSHIES ignore that part. RUSH LIMBAUGH IS A NEANDERTHAL for characterizing this young woman as a slut and prostitute. Isn’t it amazing how women are demeaned for wanting to be in control of their lives and bodies. Meanwhile men are absolutely blameless; they are just being guys, “sowing their wild oats”, wink, wink. Women are sluts for the same behavior. NICE HYPOCRISY THERE!!
Posted by: pksk531 | March 1, 2012, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
3000 dollars a year is a made up number meant, by the Dems, to get just the reaction its getting, contraception was not and is not a real issue. There are plenty of free and discounted options out there, I would hope someone attending college would be smart enough to know that. If we are to pay for womens contraception why don’t we also pay for toothpaste? That is a health issue is it not? This whole made up issue, the lies, misinformation and the overall supression of the truth by the mainstream media and the democrats they are in bed with is repulsive at best. If their contrception was truly a health issue it WOULD be covered by their insurer, why should the few actual taxpaying americans be forced to pay for her time on her back? Where is the individual responsibility here?
Posted by: 5aniel | March 1, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
She’s more than a slut. She’s an idiot, plain and simple. It would cost $3,000 a year for birth control pills during the tenure of law school. Really? LOL! Good argument. I can tell she’s going to be a great attorney!! Once again, stupidity defies logic. But then again, logically she would use abortion as a form of birth control. Abstinance should never be a factor! She makes it so easy for me to see why I could never be a Liberal….Thank God!
Posted by: Deela | March 1, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I guess we all can’t force our maids to go purchase drugs for us like Rush. I hope she puts her law education to good use and sues the pig for slander. There are 11 states that already have this rule and not a peep was heard when they enacted their legislation. It’s only because it’s Obama that everyone is up in arms. And for the uneducated among us the cost of birth control pills are the same regardless of how much sex you have or if you are taking them for medical reasons. Rush is not only a loud-mouthed drug addict, he’s uneducated as well.
Posted by: Catherine | March 1, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
She is not a slut, she is just an idiot. she cant figure out how to get free or cheap birth control? none of her partners can figure out how to get it free? is there anyone stupid enough to ever hire her in the future? and who is Alexa Keyes? is she purposely misrepresenting what Rush said and what this other idiot fluke said. ABC news should at least fact check before they let this garbage be posted. Thank god Rush is there to shine light on these idiots.
Posted by: Neil | March 1, 2012, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
She’s the one who should be ashamed of herself. The idea of asking the rest of us to pay for her birth control.
Posted by: Angela | March 1, 2012, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Having so much sex, she’s going broke…at Georgetown Law…
If this slut (look it up) can’t afford her own birth control…she can put an aspirin between her legs.
BTW – everyone in Washington can get FREE Contraceptives and Lube from the Washington Department of Health.
Posted by: Joe | March 1, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I am not paying for her to have sex. Slut
Posted by: name | March 1, 2012, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
It’s hilarious to listen to all the lefties get up in arms over this comment, but boo wasn’t said when the liberal mainstream media was making baseless, sexist comments about michelle malkin, sarah palin, and michelle bachmann. Not a word was said.
Now a woman who thinks it’s up to me to pay for her sexual promiscuity wants to be portrayed as a hero? Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.
Posted by: Michael K | March 1, 2012, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
this isn’t about sex or ovarian cysts, it’s about the churches obeying the law of the land when it comes to healthcare. I may not like our wars in the mid-east or the existence of capital punishment, but I know I pay my taxes because I am part of the american social contract. religion isn’t above the laws of the US… and if it thinks it is then it’s time for the American people to treat it as an enemy not a friend
Posted by: gbuddha2012 | March 1, 2012, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
How much sex must you have for it to cost $3,000? Do these women even know how unhealthy birth control pills are? High blood pressure, blood clots, headaches – perhaps even cancer. Then you want us to pay to treat that too? ABC get the Rush quote right. And if we have to pay for it, like Rush said, post your antics on the internet so we can get our money’s worth! In my day, we paid for our own sex.
Posted by: Dee | March 1, 2012, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Perhaps people who don’t listen to Rush should listen to him and not the spin from the MSM.
If a woman or man “and” their chosen sex objects can’t afford to pay for their own birth control then they need to stop having sex. The country is not responsible to pay for the sexual appetite of college students, or anyone else for that matter.
If the girl wants the school or insurance company provided by the school to pay for her birth control/abortifacients then she should change schools and go to a secular liberal institute of social engineering. Can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: siylencedogood | March 1, 2012, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
If this woman really expects to pay $3k in condoms and contraception over the course of her law school attendance, she should seriously rethink the actual purpose of college. Why do these idiots demand that their baby preventers be supplied for free by taxpayers? What in the name of all that is sacred makes them so entitled to free contraception? Ever heard of abstinence? Ever heard of virginity at marriage? Ever heard of Planned Parenthood? Those murderers are more than happy to hand out sperm sacs to anyone who feels the need to have sex with any old Tom, Dick or Harry. If you want contraception lady, go get a job and PAY FOR IT YOURSELF! Get off your back and work a real job.
Oh, and if taxpayers have to pay women to have sex (via providing free birth control) then it is what it is…. Prostitution. Go Rush.. Give ‘em hell!
Posted by: Wendy | March 1, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Glenn Beck said the same thing yesterday. Slut and Hoe? You just called 98% of catholics sluts and hoes for using birth control. You people are idiots being led by Rush and Glenn. You are on the wrong side of this. Thanks for helping Obama get re-elected!
Posted by: herbissimo | March 1, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Why doesn’t she split the cost between her and her lover(s) . It would then only cost her about $1.25 a year
Posted by: Steve | March 1, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
He’s right.
Posted by: jeremy | March 1, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
CATMAN….what are you going to do when we get a single payer national health insurance plan…? Because that is exactly where this whole mess is headed. We have so called religious employers who want ‘tax exempt status’ (in some cases) and yet want to DISCRIMINATE against their employees and other employers with (LOL…moral consciences) who want to be unrealistic prigs and discriminate against theirs. Now we are talking REALITY here. I wish all these people who try to “HIDE” behind the First Amendment would get “human” and just plain “grow up”! We would have a much more sane and better world.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Seriously, if she can afford Georgetown, she can afford her own birth control.
Posted by: donna | March 1, 2012, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown law student gets up before the congress and made an UTTER fool out of herself. She, indeed manufactured an issue. It is a nonissue folks. Contraception is cheap. High schools hand them out to students like candy….for free. Planned Parenthood gets millions in MY taxpaid monies and gives out free condoms and low priced oral contraceptives. And PP has facilities everywhere.
What is the beef that this “brilliant” law student has? Her beef is that she is all wee-wee’d up about the fact that a religious institution has a belief that contraception is against their religious tenets. This woman got up and lied through her teeth on campus not being able to afford birth control. C’mon, $3,000 a yr for birth control???? The woman lied, lied, lied.
Perhaps Rush Limbaugh did not use polite words towards this woman, but this woman’s testimony as absolutely manipulative and shameless.
Posted by: littleleers | March 1, 2012, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
If she can afford Georgetown, she can afford to pay for her own birth control.
Posted by: donna | March 1, 2012, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Rush is using a lascivious entertainment monologue that is focused on sex under cover of a legitimate social issue being discussed in the public forum to promote his show and to sell advertising. That makes Rush every bit the slut and prostitute that he is accusing this woman of being, and he is showing himself to be far closer to the true definitions of those words than she is, if she is at all.
Posted by: sameagain | March 1, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I listened to Limbaugh’s show and the aspirin comment was purposely used for humor. If you’re a liberal go a dictionary and look up the word. G’town charges $60k per year and seems she has no problem affording that. But the White House has become the pimp house. Woody Allen once said that he had been practicing birth control when he asked women to go to bed with him and they all said “no”.
Posted by: SB | March 1, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
If you can’t afford to have sex then don’t have it. People act like a bunch of animals, like we have not self control or brains. Oh, that is what the left want us to be. Stupid, mindless, helpless people, that need the governments help for everything. She is not a good example of any moral woman in the United Staes. Don’t ever compare me or any other moral woman to this idot. Rush is just stating the truth adn the truth hurts. Our “right” to birth control is not being taken away, it’s the “right” for everyone in the United States to pay for your birth control is the problem that should not even be discussed.
Posted by: Josephine | March 1, 2012, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Sandra Fluke was chosen to testify before Congress because she came from a so-called Catholic school. They didn’t fool real Catholics. We know that Georgetown hasn’t been a Catholic school for decades. Then poor Sandra told everyone in the country she is a slut and so were her fellow students. Talk about a deformed conscience – she did not even know she should be ashamed of her behavior. At least Daryll Issa had the decency to deny this woman’s testimony in his committee. The democrats once again used a woman to make a fool of herself and allowed her become a target for derision to advance their libertine agenda. The democrats have no shame and neither do their voters.
Posted by: Navymum | March 1, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
If Alexa Keys is so Disturbed by Rush L. Views, Maybe Alexa should Pay for Contraception for Sandra Fluke’s “so Called Victims” Instead of Taxing hard Working Americans for their Sexual Habits!
What the HELL IS THIS MEDIA COMMING TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m DISGUSTED by THIS REPORT!
Posted by: Hennezy | March 1, 2012, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Gawd, maybe Breitbart needs some company. Limbaugh is the perfect choice.
If men could get pregnant, this would be a non-issue. So would abortion….
Posted by: J | March 1, 2012, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Battleground Poll today: Obama gets beaten by Romney straight up! And this is after all those intra-Republican attacks on each other in the primaries. LOL! Libs must be wetting themselves – and this pimping of women will help Obama? Americans (outside of NY, Chi, LA/SF, & DC) are not as stupid as you regressives assumed. You libs are going to need a hell of a lot more dead people voting than in past elections.
Posted by: SB | March 1, 2012, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
How hard is it for you to be responsible for yourself??? If you want to have a sex life. Fine, dont make me pay for it!!! Cradle to grave entitlement. This is what the left wants. Sandra Fluke is a absolute joke!!
Posted by: Jeff | March 1, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
No wonder the republican candidates are so uncivil. Look at what their constituency is like. My parents slapped the crap out of me when I called people names. Apparently a lot of right wing republicans grew up as orphans, including Mitt, Rick, Newt, Rush, Glen, Shawn and Andrew.
Sounds to me like you republicans are doing the same as the the incident in Afghanistan when that girl was raped then thrown in jail for adultery.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
For some reason I have seen an overwhelming number of closed-minded and limited comments listed. Birth control isn’t a liberal or conservative issue, it’s a family issue and a woman’s perogative. Ms. Fluke was a college student, true, but at some point she will be entering the workforce, and she will be dependent on workplace insurance for her coverage. She was talking about her future. I am a married mother, who has no intentions of having another child. My personal choice for contracpetion is birth control pills, and without coverage, they would be expensive. Latex allergies make condoms a no-go. While I can have more children, according to doctor’s advice I shouldn’t. Should I am my husband stop having sex? Am I a slut for taking the pill in an effort to protect my life.
Men, your daughters are listening, your sisters are listening, and your mothers are disgusted. Many of you sound as though you aren’t familiar with modern sex. Women get on top now, too!
Posted by: Nef | March 1, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Why should the taxpayer pay for her birth control? Without insurance she is looking at $240-$600 per year. With insurance it would be around $60-$180. Damn nanny staters – take some responsibility for yourself.
Posted by: RWC | March 1, 2012, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Why do some people think that everyone else should be responsible for paying them to have sex? Also, I looked up the definition of “prostitution” and I here’s what I found…. pros•ti•tu•tion — { Pronunciation: (pros”ti-tOO’shun, -tyOO’-), [key]
—n. 1. the act or practice of engaging in sexual intercourse for money.
2. base or unworthy use, as of talent or ability. } Fluke demands to be paid to have sex, Rush says that’s prostitution. According to the definition, he’s correct.
Posted by: TexBork2012 | March 1, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Riddle me this…
My wife uses birth control. We are teachers. Which means we are essentially government workers. Our insurance pays for it. Are we nanny staters? Is my wife a slut? Should she not use birth control? Should we just stop having sex?
Posted by: herbissimo | March 1, 2012, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
You republicans fail to see birth control medication is not used for just intercourse. I lot of that stuff prevents cervical cancer and a variety of other women’s diseases. Why are you all vilifying this girl?
All she did was testify before Congress and now there’s a right wing conservative mob that would like to lynch her.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Rush is Right !!! Buy your own party favors Fluke !!!!
Posted by: Juju | March 1, 2012, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Its a new form of WELFARE the libs are pushing…
RUSH IS RIGHT AGAIN!
Posted by: Geni | March 1, 2012, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Rush is just mad because girls never really liked him. That’s why he turned to drugs.
Posted by: sameagain | March 1, 2012, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Rush Limbaugh, the guy who got busted with illegal prescription boner pills, calling someone a slut? Hahahahahahahahaha!
Posted by: A Cynic | March 1, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The people here who are saying that this woman was asking for free birth control have no idea what this issue is about.The issue is the insurance that they and their employers pay for will have conrtaception included in their insurance coverage-They are not asking for government handouts-you fools-just to have it in their coverage that they are paying for thru insurance companies-the ignorance here is frightening.
Posted by: laura | March 1, 2012, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
The left is destroying the morals in America? Hmmm….I guess ignorance really is bliss.
Posted by: Dave Chappelle | March 1, 2012, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
When I went to college they had something called an athletic fee. Maybe they could dip into that for Ms. Fluke?
Posted by: newcountryman | March 1, 2012, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Rush Limbaugh is not only correct but he’s entertaining you while your learning…he’s the best teacher out their and one of the only ones telling the truth…this idio, Fluke, could go to a cheaper college so she could afford to pay for your own health care but she said NO, I’ll go to this college and then to Congress, tell the world I have so much sex I can’t afford to pay for the protection myself so I want the insurance companies to pay for it and in the meantime she gets her name plastered all over the news…she LOVES it. Really, this whole issue is hysterical. People on the left should listen to their argument – it is such a silly argument and not believable. Finally, WE NEED to take care of ourselves and stop thinking it is governments job. This is not a woman’s health care issue – its political. The greedy politiicians just want more control over our lives.
Posted by: Christine | March 1, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
He had to bail from his home town before he graduated HS too – I’m betting it was after his grandpa the judge got him out of sexual deviant charge.
Posted by: steve | March 1, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
First, I do not think that forcing insurance companies to provide contraception (as solely a contraceptive) at no cost to members is constitutional.
Second, I think that if the Catholic church is so against contraception, it should call out and condemn its members for using them as well and not just take a stand against the government for forcing them to allow it.
Lastly, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and all of these other right wing guys are way over the line. Either they are so ignorant on the subject of birth control pills that they do not realize that you do not take more pills for more sex or they are purposefully twisting words to paint this woman in an extremely negative light. She never said that the cost was $1000/year (over 3 years) for condoms. It was specifically talking about birth control pills. Yet they are calling her a slut and doing calculations on how many times she has sex a day (Beck, 2.74) based on using $1 condoms as the form of contraception. Then they use this information to generalize her as a slut. That does not sit well with me. It’s petty name calling and childish behavior.
Posted by: JonJones | March 1, 2012, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Some of you people are so dense. I am amazed at the ignorance here.
The contraception Fluke is talking about is NOT condoms or special methods that allow her to have sex. No, Fluke is referring to the medical need some women have to take the pill, who can cost about 50$/month, that’s makes about 600$/year. Not sure where the 3000$ figure came from but it was certainly calculated to make people notice that it’s expensive. Furthermore, it’s NOT taxpayers who would be paying that money, it’s the insurance companies, the same insurance companies that are rich off of the customers they are barely covering. If your medical insurance didn’t cover a common ailment, what’s the point of having medical insurance? THAT’s what this debate is about, and if you think otherwise, get your head out of your ass and do some research. You do NOT have the right to an opinion if it’s an uninformed one. And for those of you who think sex is all around bad, well that’s fine, but know that people are going to be having it, probably a lot more than you, and your jealousy and misunderstanding will not change that fact. What will affect you is if some sexually active person contracts a disease that the insurers do cover and that will cost tons more than the preventative means would cost. If you are a parent, get over your prudence, your kids are going to have sex. Wouldn’t you prefer they be safe while doing it?
Posted by: MIke | March 1, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
You conservative republicans remind me of the lynch mob in “To Kill a Mockingbird”. Let’s just take her out and stone her because she had the nerve to testify before that good old boys club.
Rush Limbaugh is a joke; he’ll say anything to improve his ratings and seldom knows what he is talking about.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Oral contraceptives also are effective for more than just “recreational” sex; Rush needs to get his facts straight. If Ms Fluke as a law student doesn’t take the opportunity to file a defamation suit against Mr Limbaugh she is missing a great opportunity to fund her university career. His published claims of her character have done her possible irreperable damage and he should be held culpable for making wreckless inflamatory statements.
Posted by: Hugh Callenish | March 1, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
How about an amendment to Obamacare (vs. executive fiat)…The Fluking-Slut Amendment?
Posted by: Dallas Dinosaur | March 1, 2012, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
I read stories like this by an activist feminist “journalist”…and I laugh. I read comments from brain dead leftists here…and I laugh. So pills that cost $40/Mo are too much for someone attending a $60,000/Yr Law School? Really? I wonder how much the bottle of wine costs to get in the mood… Are we gonna have to pay for that, too? How about the nice Italian meal? Put it on the tab! What’s really wrong here is the fact that this ignorant “Jane” is actually in her third year in Law School. Georgetown must be so proud!
Posted by: Jim Saultz | March 1, 2012, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
If you can afford Georgetown at 50K per year, you can afford birth control. You have just been lawyered.
Posted by: GQ | March 1, 2012, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Wouldn’ it be sweet poetic justice if Sandra filed a successful lawsuit against this fat jerk…and he got so worked up on his program that he had the”big one’ right in front of all of us. I’m certain that I would record it and replay it and enjoy it just as much as I do the reruns of Christmas Vacation and Animal House. What a bombastic, disgusting, pathetic individual. And yeah…I mean exactly what I say.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
This “man” depends on a dumb-as-dirt audience, and he has a very large audience in the US. Sometimes it is very disheartening to read how stupid many in our nation have become. I blame FOX and Limbaugh, et al, but it is possible they were just born that way! Great argument for government sponsored birth control.
Posted by: J S O'Brien | March 1, 2012, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
These comments make me almost as sick as the article itself. If you had the mental faculties to actually understand what you read, you would see that the cost of birth control is $3,000 over the course of law school. Law school lasts three years, so let’s do the basic math, geniuses–$3,000/3 = $1,000 per year. Great, now that that is settled, the amount of money you spend on birth control is not directly related to the amount of sex you have. When you are on the pill, you take one pill per day. Therefore, as another poster pointed out, you take the same amount of birth control if you have sex once per month or if you have sex once per hour. Additionally, many women take the pill for a number of medically-required reasons such as recurring ovarian cysts or irregular periods, which can lead to early onset menopause or even infertility. Limbaugh’s sladerous comments about a woman who goes to one of the best law schools in the country are abhorrent, at best. And to answer his question on whether the Fluke family is proud of their daughter, the answer should be a resounding “yes.” Use of birth control is a choice and it should be up to the user whether or not to take it. It should not be precluded from health plans because it has a negative connotation–especially given all of the medical conditions it treats. If Limbaugh doesn’t like that, he shouldn’t go on the pill.
Posted by: Anon | March 1, 2012, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
This is a LABOR Law Issue, not a Religious Freedom issue. The hatred and ignorance of many of these comments is unbelievable. First, you clearly hate the idea of women controlling their sex lives. Do you have daughters? What Century do we live in? Would you prefer they get pregnant? Wonder if you would call a young man who has sex before marriage “a slut.” Second, many don’t understand math: 3 yrs law school/ $3000 = $1,000/yr, for 12 mos = $83/mo. In 80s, w/ health ins, I paid $30/mo, so 27 yrs later, $83/mo does not sound out of line. Cost is the same if you have sex 1x/yr or 365x! U can’t count on men using a condom. Lastly, as Ms. Fluke stated, not ALL women who take contraceptive pills for birth control. It is also used for endometriosis, cysts, and other reasons, like hormone control during menopause.
Posted by: JoeMN | March 1, 2012, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
People saying it’s $3000/ year, please learn to read! It’s $3000 over the course of THREE years and the cost/month is constant independent of how much sex she is having.
Posted by: tat77 | March 1, 2012, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Why does Rush say that she’s “having so much sex that she can’t afford her birth control pills”?
Does he think that more sex means you need more pills?
As far as I know, it’s one a day, they don’t start working for a month, and, well, if you have sex once a year vs. 100 times/day, it’s the same quantity of hormones.
Posted by: Sylph | March 1, 2012, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
The problem here is the media and not Sandra. She has the right to do with her body what ever she wants, just don’t expect others to pay for your personal choice. So let’s look at the facts:
#1-There are many forms of birth control. If she is referring to the pill, at most it would cost her $50mo x 12mos= $600 and that’s without insurance. She’s under 26 and a full time student so it is likely to assume she’s covered under her parents or the school’s student plan. Birth control pill are prescribed for more than just birth control because of the hormones they contain. The cost of birth control has no direct correlation to the amount of sex she’s having.
#2- By birth control she also includes condoms then they are given away free at Planned Parenthood, free clinics, and student health centers so if she’s spending $1k/yr on condoms then that’s her personal preferrence. They’re also available at Wal-Mart and Costco in bulk if she has a type she likes but again that is a personal preferrence. The cost of condoms have a direct correlation with the amount of sex one is having.
When I first heard the story, minus the Limbaugh part, I joked and said “If she’s spending that much, maybe she should start charging!” After I heard more and more about the story and how it’s being warped by the media I see why she wasn’t allowed to speak on the panel. If she’s qualified to speak then every worker at the Bunny Ranch should be allowed to as well. I’m sure they would take an opposite stance against Miss Fluke.
Posted by: Theresa | March 1, 2012, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“you clearly hate the idea of women controlling their sex lives”
You can’t tell the difference between a woman controlling her sex life, and wanting taxpayers to control her sex life.
Posted by: Spike | March 1, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
I wonder if she could sue for slander? Beck and Limbaugh repeatedly refer to her as being a promiscuous woman with no evidence at all to back up the claim.
Posted by: JonJones | March 1, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
He’s really a pig. Honestly and truly. He knows he’s manipulating the thinking of thousands of people who take his word as gospel. Lest we forget the years he was smashed on oxycontin, doctor shopping for his prescriptions, which he can clearly afford on his inflated salary. His fat surgery. His plasctic surgery, his multiple wives. He whined like a baby when he lost his hearing and then got state of the art inplant hearing aids – which are NOT covered under most people’s insurance policies. He’s an elitist pig. A woman can take birth control one day at a time. It doesn’t work that way. It’s not like condoms, where you use it once and done. Whether you use it for a medical condition or contraception, you have to buy it by the month. He’s just a moron.
Posted by: anchor no 2 | March 1, 2012, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Are you people kidding me? Birth control does not only consist of Condoms you morons!!! There is some called “the pill” that you take daily. And it is indeed expensive. Also oral contraceptives (the pill for the slow ones that are spewing their ridiculous statements) assist women with severe menstral cycles. It’s not just used for preventing pregnancies. Rush Limbaugh is a bonafide donkey (can’t say what I REALLY want to say). It’s bad enough the “right” causes racial tension….but now they are causing tension between the sexes. Ridiculous!!!
Posted by: Joy | March 1, 2012, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
My favorite comment so far: Close your legs, and open your books.
3-Year Georgetown University Law Degree: $180,000.
24-Pack of Condoms: $12.
Having the audacity to stand before a Congressional Committee and proclaiming that you can’t afford to pay an additional $3,000 over the course of three years for contraception ($3,000 / $12 = 250 boxes of condoms over 3 years–or 83.333 boxes per year–each containing 24 condoms = 2,000 condoms a year/365 days = 5.48 sexual encounters requiring a condom *PER DAY*): Priceless. Oh, and calling her a slut really is unfair… to sluts. Most prostitutes would would kill to have those stats.
Posted by: KeenObserver | March 1, 2012, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Who cares how much sex she has? The question is: How does she dare to ask ME to pay for her contraception? Is she a total nut job in addition to whatever else she is? GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!
Posted by: Happycamper | March 1, 2012, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
tmferretti, I know that birth control pills cause breast cancer and blood clots as well as other hormonal abnormalities and does not prevent the spread of sexual diseases, but does incidentally promote venereal disease. as well as INCREASING the chances of cervical cancer (not preventing it), jaundice, suppression of the immune system, and also known to cause complications in future pregnancies. There have also been cases where the use of contraceptive pills have led to ectopic pregnancies and even miscarriages. It is also common for women who use the pill to go through mood swings, depression, and anxiety. It can even lead to high blood pressure and cholesterol. Still if a woman chooses this anyway, she can budget for it herself. I shouldn’t have includes other women’s demands for birth control pills in my budget.
Posted by: TexBork2012 | March 1, 2012, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Birth control pills at $80-90 a month, over three years, would come to around $3000. The fact that someone is on birth control pills hardly makes her a slut — it makes her someone who doesn’t want an unplanned pregnancy. You know, the kind that usually ends with an abortion. Rush, Glenn, etc., operate on the level of playground bullies. Conservatism, intellectually speaking, is dead as a doornail.
Posted by: Steve | March 1, 2012, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Do you commenters agreeing with Rush really not understand that you don’t take more birth control pills when you have more sex? It’s one pill every day, whether you’re a virgin or sexually active. So my question is, are you stupid or lying?
Posted by: Jacquie | March 1, 2012, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
“She has the right to do with her body whatever she wants, just don’t expect others to pay for it….”??? Theresa…we’re talking about health insurance coverage here and employers responsibility in providing it – regardless of their personal beliefs. So if people smoke…and develop lung cancer OR if they drink too much and get cirrosis of the liver isince their employer doesn’t agree with that lifestyle morally they can then just discriminate on their coverage. I would hope that the majority of the women in this country can logically think through things…better than you just have.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
The girl is an idiot. Birth control is cheap. Like many of her age, she laughably misunderstands the concept of “insurance”. Health insurance is a bet by a group of individuals (see “corporation” for you lefties) that they can collect more in premiums than they have to pay out for ILLNESSES and other MEDICAL PROBLEMS and the associated costs to cure those illnesses and medical problems. PREGNANCY is neither an illness nor a medical problem. PAY FOR IT YOURSELF OR GET YOUR FRIGGING BOYFRIENDS TO PAY FOR IT (or “Johns”, as in the case of Ms. Fluke, apparently). Are we clear, kiddies?
Posted by: GPIslander | March 1, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Birth control pills are used for more than stopping a pregnancy; they prevent cervical cancer and a variety of other women’s problems.
I hate to tell you this guys, but most of your wives think that having access to birth control is good. I know mine does and she’s too old to get pregnant but it helps her with menopause, cramping and such.
Typical Rush, spouting BS when he doesn’t have a clue. The man is brain-dead and has no control of his mouth.
If the republicans keep pushing this issue, they’ll lose the 25% of women in the general election still left after Santorum’s remarks.
Posted by: tmferretti | March 1, 2012, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
the war on women continues
Posted by: LC | March 1, 2012, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
The men are bad enough, but it’s the women here who are defending Rush that are truly chilling.
Posted by: Steve | March 1, 2012, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
I have known anyone to allege that Mr. Limbaugh has too much sophistication and is too open-minded in his thinking.
Posted by: wavygravynet | March 1, 2012, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
It is no wonder that there is so much more teen pregnancy in the red states with the misinformation about birth control pills so many right-wingers put into their comments!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 1, 2012, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Sandra Fluke should definitely sue Limbaugh for slander and defamation of character. He must be losing it to make comments like that!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 1, 2012, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
As it’s already been mentioned, birth control pills treat more medical conditions than just preventing pregnancy. Yet nobody has mentioned that Viagara is used for one sole purpose – SEX – and it is covered under medical insurance and women have been paying for this all along.
It has also not been mentioned that all you guys that are whining about how “you don’t want to pay” for this medicine for woman to be covered are forgetting that YOU WILL BE paying 20% of your income for the next few decades for each of your illegitimate children.
Posted by: lbelle25 | March 1, 2012, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Sounds like ol’ Rushbo may be a “fired host talking”. He’s headed for deep doo doo with this nonsense.
Posted by: sameagain | March 1, 2012, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Ok…I’ll say it again. Here is where we are at on Health Care in the USA. The GOP with all their divisive rhetoric and incendiary tactics (their wedge issues like contraception) will, along with their insane and illogical and irrational attempt to repeal the Affordable Health Care Act…will back our country into a single payer National Health Care Plan. Because they will have to ‘compromise’…because the demographic of non-progressive people that the GOP currently represents is shrinking and dying off. That is why it is so easy to get them to fear and be outraged. But their time has passed. Our nation WILL go forward progressively…with or without them. And I figure that the “smartest” of them will eventually figure it out and ..get on board.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
its amazing that he has an issue with birth control which is a responsible thing to do. I am surprised he does not have an issue with paying to Diabetes medications or Cholestrerol, the majoraty of people who take these medications are overweight by choice and why should I/we have to pay for these individuals and yes Rush i am sure your your one of them judding from the looks of you. You could stand to lose a few pounds. So instead of worrying about woman being responsable for there health, maybe you and all the other obese people should learn from this and start being responsable for your health and lose some weight.
Posted by: John | March 1, 2012, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Wow. This is just offensive. What about men who want condoms? Are they sluts? Aside from that clear point of sexism, this woman says she needs the pill to prevent cysts – AKA to treat her polycystic ovarian syndrome. Not treating it could lead to Type II diabetes, obesity, excess body/facial hair, acne, and potentially heart problems. Does this medication also act as contraception? Yes. However, Limbaugh’s hotheaded nature caused him to jump the gun and be unable/unwilling to actually listen to what anyone was saying.
Posted by: Kat | March 1, 2012, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
My interest in the religions and morals protection has nothing to do with female reproduction if I do not employ any young women. But I do have a moral problem paying for people who refuse to alter their lifestyle and lose weight or stop eating salt, and expect me to pay higher rates for their costly visits to the doctor and ridiculous medicines. I do not believe in using medicines except in extreme cases, like an infection after a necessary surgery. I consider it immoral to interfere with the signs the Lord sends us to let us know that we are doing something wrong. If your blood pressure is up, eat right and slow down, and pray for inner peace. If medicine was part of God’s plan, there would not be so many bad side effects. Some employees have to go to the doctor because their medications have caused more problems! With the money I will save when I can finally stop paying for unnecessary medication and doctors’ visits. I can give raises to the people who deserve them. Let people who believe medicine can replace good living shop around for other employers.
Posted by: Doris | March 1, 2012, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
What is this man even talking about? I do not understand his statement about having so much sex one cannot afford birth control pills… Does this just not prove that he an imbecile with absolutely zero knowledge of what he is spouting hateful rhetoric about? He is just a hateful, sexist man and I honestly have no idea why he is even in the public sphere. He should go back to the hole he crawled out of, how in the world can anyone take this human seriously. Why is there even a news article on him? He is not a politician, just a pompous pig with an apparently very, very ignorant following.
Posted by: Kittea | March 1, 2012, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Also, according to the Washington Post, Sandra Fluke enrolled in Georgetown knowing full well what their policy on birth control and contraceptives was:
“Fluke came to Georgetown University interested in contraceptive coverage: She researched the Jesuit college’s health plans for students before enrolling, and found that birth control was not included. “I decided I was absolutely not willing to compromise the quality of my education in exchange for my health care,” says Fluke, who has spent the past three years lobbying the administration to change its policy on the issue.”
If this is indeed accurate, then Sandra Fluke primary goal for enrolling in a Catholic University was to force them to violate their own religious doctrines.
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 1, 2012, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Why doesn’t anyone think of the bigger picture here? Taxpayers cover more stupid crap than birth control. Yes, I believe birth control should be free, not because I use it. I don’t have insurance, and when I was on the pill, it was 70.00 a month. I’m not paying that for any pill. I buy a box of condoms, I’ve been married for 15 years, so sex is once or twice a month. That 7.99 box of condoms for 12, lasts about 6 months…Back to the issue…We are so over populated already, those who can’t afford birth control don’t abstain from sex, sorry young people can be morons. So its ok to get knocked up and go on welfare, I got some news for you, its going to cost tax payers a lot more than the cost of those pills. Your going to pay for that kid for 18 plus years. That adds up to A LOT of kids. Or hey, its ok to pay for someones kid with physical, mental, or disabled children? In the long run, it would save more money than the cost. Have it covered by insurance with a co-pay like $20.00. It’s not like insurance would pay maybe 5.00 on that. Insurance doesn’t pay the whole bill on anything they pay maybe 10%. Example I go to the doctor I pay minimum 120.00 office visit cash, insurance covered person pays that $20.00-$30.00 co-pay the insurance pays them maybe $20.00. That’s all, you think they are not in business to make money? It doesn’t matter what area of anything in this country you look at, its all a scam in one way or another. I have yet to understand why anyone would listen to this idiot. He makes it sound like the more sex you have the more birth control it takes. Yea, I learned at school in 5th grade, about reproduction, did he skip the class? There are millions of women who have to be on the pill due to things like PCOS, which is highly painful and not fixable. Some women with periods so heavy they almost hemorrhage, so birth control isn’t just for “sluts” or “promiscuous women”. I have a teenage daughter, I’m not going to bury my head in the sand and pretend sex doesn’t happen..I’ll go and pay for those pills and continue to push my belief in condoms as well. I’d rather as parent know she was being safe, and not getting knocked up saddled with kids and ruining her life. For the idiot who said “I’d never pay for my daughters pills” your kids learn more about sex at school than anywhere else. So you would rather your kid get knocked up than help to prevent it? When my daughters over 18 then she’ll pay for them herself. Kids shouldn’t be having sex before then, but you know what they do it anyway. I’d rather be proactive than in denial!!
Posted by: Puffy | March 1, 2012, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
For God’s sake whether a woman decides to have sex once a year or every day does not change the amount of birth control pills she needs. You take the pill every day whether you have sex or not. And some women take the pill to avoid the risk of pregnancy but a significant number of women take it purely for medical reasons. Limbaugh is a sexist pig who does not know anything about women.
Posted by: Danny | March 1, 2012, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I have lived frugally all of my life. So, you can imagine how thrilled I am that my healthcare premiums will now increase to pay for free birth control for all! I drive a ’93 truck, have a basic cell phone, no flat screen, laptop, etc. Somehow, they all manage to afford expensive high-tech phones, laptops, tri-colored hair, piercings, tatts, regular manis and pedis, and of coursse, Yaeger shots on the weekends. Do I sound bitter?
Posted by: jane | March 1, 2012, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
For those who apparently never passed sex ed, you are suppose to use condoms and oral contraceptives in concert with each other, condoms help prevent against disease and unwanted pregnancy but they break so oral contraception is there as a catch all for pregnancy.Oh by the way some people have latex allergies so those people’s only choice for protection agianst pregnancy is oral contraceptives.More than just the blatant hatred of women (I am a dude by the way) this issue shows the rampant ignorance that is acceptable in today’s America. My sister’s bestfriend is able to have kids today because of oral contraceptives that saved her ovaries while she was in college, I’m not sure if it is the say illness that Miss Flukes friend was diagnosed with. They also help control my girlfriend’s menstruation which became irregular a few months ago Please idiots and your idiot representatives keep your hands of my sister, my sister’s friends, my girlfriend, and my mother.
Posted by: Is ther anyone sane left on this planet? | March 1, 2012, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Does ABC even bother to check facts anymore, or do you just make it up as you go along?
She WAS NOT barred from testifying at a hearing on women’s access to birth control. She was barred from testifying at a heariong about whether the birth control mandate was a violation of the First Amendment. As Fluke is not a canon lawyer, a theologian, or a constitutional scholar (indeed, not even an attorney), why SHOULD she have been allowed to testify? Because she had an opinion? So do 300 million other Americans. They weren’t invited either.
As for Limbaugh, he called her a “slut” in reference to the fictitious costs she threw around for birth control — costs which, if genuine, worked out to about 5 copulations per day over three years.
Posted by: TPEwok | March 1, 2012, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I hope this young woman sues this idiot for slander today!! I can’t understand why the idiots he works for don’t kick him off the air!! Too bad the Republicans, bow to this Limbaugh idiot, we need the real Republican party back.
Posted by: Bette New Sousa | March 1, 2012, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
If anyone, including Mr. Limbaugh, had listened to Ms. Fluke’s testimony, it was about a friend who died due to complications due to ovarian cysts — complications that could have been avoided with hormone-regulating contraceptives. She is the opposite of a slut. She is a caring citizen, concerned about women’s health. Which also makes her the opposite of Rush Limbaugh. She, and her parents, should be proud.
Posted by: Blumeanie | March 1, 2012, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Back in ’89 we used to stop pounding nails and eat lunch while we listened to Rush. He was funny and light hearted. Well the times have changed. We had no idea how much money would be connected to hate. I am personally discusted with Mr. Limbaugh. It’t time for him to retire and go fishing. Adios, Rushbo…..I’d like to slap the white off that fat face of yours. You betrayed us, you lied to us. Anyone who says he hopes the President of our country will fail is no friend of mine.
Posted by: peter | March 1, 2012, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
The woman goes to a Catholic law school where tuition, room and board cost $65,000 a year, and she thinks the school or taxpayers should be forced to pay for her birth control? Mr Limbaugh isn’t far out of line.
Posted by: dave c | March 1, 2012, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Rush is an idiot. And more than that the right wing nut jobs that pay homage to him are even bigger idiots. If this country is ever driven to a civil war the primary cause will be the ignorance and intolerance of the right wing conservatives. It amazes me to read all these comments about a person being a slut and I should not have to pay, when i’m sure that the majority of those making these comments have benefited from a govt subsidized program at some point. So that makes them idiots and hypocrits.
Posted by: Michael Gavin | March 1, 2012, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
I posit that taxpayers should be required to finance contraception for women, while the women who are benefiting from this policy should be required to copulate with any taxpayer, with a “refusal to provide recompensation to taxpayer” fine levied against any women who abstain. This formulated policy is very similar to any other variety of subsidization of services for the general welfare, but I think that it is significantly more titillating.
Posted by: James Theuer | March 1, 2012, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Rush was making a joke. What do you call a woman who is paid to have sex? Get it? This woman wants someone else to pay for her birth control, get it? She wants someone else to pay for her to have sex, get it? She can go to any clinic and get free birth control. She just saw an opportunity to make a name for herself, get it? Rush isn’t against women or birth control. Like most people, he thinks people should pay their own way through life. This woman will graduate from Georgetown Law School, become one of the 1%, and will probably still expect somebody else to pay for her birth control. Only in America. I listened to Rush that day while I was eating lunch. He meant it as a joke, get it? By the way, you can go to his website and read or listen to every word of his show. The media hacks are liars. Go to his website and read it for yourself.
Posted by: This is fun | March 1, 2012, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Consider the source – sounds like junkie dribble to me . . oh, wait, Rush is a junkie.
His ignorance grows by leaps and bounds. Anyone familiar with birth control pills knows that they are administered for more reasons that just birth control and are prescribed for more than that one reason. I wonder if Mr. and Mrs. Limbaugh are or would be proud of their son after hearing his tirade.
Posted by: Makali Utlayolisdi | March 1, 2012, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
such a classy, young lady. Her response to Limbaugh’s comments was shear grace and dignity.
Posted by: Jeff | March 1, 2012, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
LOL…LOL…just another example of “Every Good Turn Deserves A Favor” for the GOP. When you pander to the “crazies” and create a “monster” for two decades – like they have to the type of base that listens to a “loon” like Limbaugh -your “chickens come home to roost’. Look at the position they are in now. If they ‘admonish” Limbaugh….they upset their ‘base’. When they are ‘silent’ – like they are right now – they are slowly but surely losing the women’s vote. I’d say it look s good on the divisive, negative old men idiots.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2012, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
If that was a joke it was not funny!!!
Posted by: Julia | March 1, 2012, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Classy young lady? Who admits before the world she’s a slut and can’t pay for her contraceptives? I think not. If *YOU*’re going to play, *YOU* must pay. Not I. Keep your legs together if you can’t afford to pay for your own party.
Posted by: Lia Cataldi | March 1, 2012, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Seriously? There are people defending what was said? Obviously you have NO sense of attachment to reality. I just want to use this comment to pull together some of what other people have said and some things that I know.
1. Sandra was speaking about women as a whole, not just herself. So all of you people that are saying she can afford to attend Georgetown, but not condoms, you are idiots. She is speaking about the issue in general, and supporting it for everyone, not just herself.
2. There are many more birth control types than just condoms, which seems to be big news to you people. She is obviously referring to something more along the lines of the pill, which is taken everyday, once a day. You take it everyday, once a day whether you are having sex 80 times a day or never having sex at all. It is constant, so the idea that the more sex you have, the more it costs is absurd.
3. She is not asking you to pay for other people’s birth control. She is asking for it to be covered by insurance. You people are the reason there isn’t universal health care, so you should know that the taxpayers are not paying for other people’s health care. The coverage is through your job. So relax.
4. Probably most importantly, you people are completely ignoring the fact that birth control is medically necessary for some people. My doctor prescribed birth control to me because I get cysts on my ovaries and uterus. These can become cancerous, or interfere with fertility later in life. They’re also massively painful. Also, I had really terrible periods that were so bad they were interfering with my life.
So, now that we have our facts straight, please stop trashing someone’s character who you don’t know.
Posted by: Jess | March 1, 2012, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
Oh my God! It’s one long victory dance in the endzone for the Democrats from here through November and beyond. Wrack it up, that’s a second term for President Obama, continued Democratic control in the Senate, and now they win back the House too. See you later Tea Party, catch you next time Rush, enjoy life after politics every screwball who ran for the Republican nomination! G’bye!
Posted by: Frank | March 1, 2012, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
If only Rush’s mother had put an aspirin or 2 between her legs.
Posted by: Tim C | March 1, 2012, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Rush is obviously back on his meds. Time for another term of rehab. So all women who use birth contoll are sluts. If so then all men like Russ who take drugs are just sickos and hate women. He is a General in the Republican war on women….. and women of this country don’t kid yourselves it is a war.
Posted by: Lar 5 | March 1, 2012, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
OK, it seems pretty clear that most of those who are characterizing Ms. Fluke as a slut are A) virgins and B) not very good readers. Ms. Fluke says that the birth control might cost up to $3000 over the span of her law school years. That’s 3 years. That’s about $80 per month for birth control. And kids, that’s what it costs.
It’s probably a lot cheaper than all those fully insurance-covered vasectomies that men get.
About 98% of women take birth control at some point in their lives. So 98% of American women must be sluts.
Birth control is a social good. It prevents unwanted children. It reduces the poverty in which our children and families live. It allows families to financially care for the children they have.
And don’t look now, but both men and women benefit from birth control. Because, boys and girls, each of those girl sluts has a boy slut right there in bed with her. Go upstairs to the living room and ask mom and dad. They will confirm that that is the way sex happens.
I’m sure that the characterization of women who use birth control as sluts is coincides with a religious conviction that includes an anti-abortion stance. If you want to limit abortions, you need to have cheap and ready access to birth control. You can’t have it both ways. And if you think you can, you need to grow up. Or look at the evidence from all of human history.
People have sex. It happens, even though it really upsets you. We cover men’s contraceptive methods in insurance plans, and no one is calling them names.
We get it. Women’s bodies really terrify you, but you need to get over it.
Posted by: Denise | March 1, 2012, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
This from a man who probably used his insurance for those drugs he was abusing.
Posted by: Carolyn | March 1, 2012, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Dudes a certified clown. LOL
Posted by: Jim Bob jr. | March 1, 2012, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
So many of you are so clueless. I’m a male and I know that condoms break. I have a daughter because of a broken condom but I wouldnt turn the clock back. I love my broken condom result and now that she’s a teen I’m helping to pay for her birth control. In defense, neither she and I want her to have a baby but we are realistic and know things happen – like date and party rape. Bet you didn’t think about that, did you? Or maybe you do want raped women to look at the child daily and be reminded of the rapist every day. How cruel is that?
I’m certain Ms. Fluke is talking about birth control pills, shots, or implants. They aren’t cheap cuz the pharmaceutical companies that make them charge an arm and a leg for them. It’s a woman’s right to decide when she gets pregnant-after all, it is her body. If males get to decide when a woman can and cannot take birth control, we are no better than the taliban or al-queda.
There is no way you can reasonably destroy or counter my points unless you are sexist, callous, cruel, and a bigamist. If you are a REAL man, you will respect a woman’s rights. ‘Nuff said!
Posted by: David | March 1, 2012, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Why does she need the pill? She can swallow or take it in the red eye.
Posted by: John Hall | March 1, 2012, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Republicans’ attempt to curb access to contraceptives shows they don’t care about preventing abortions. No, their main objective is to control women and keep them bare foot, pregnant and tied to the kitchen.
Posted by: midfield91 | March 1, 2012, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I am amazed by the amount of horrifically rude and naive comments made about this young intelligent woman. God loves everyone. There it’s as simple as that. Why is it such a big deal that women want birth control in their insurance? There is nothing wrong with women taking birth control, it does not mean they are sluts or any more promiscuous than any one else. Precautions should be taken if you are going to have a physical relationship with someone. The one thing that really irritates me is that these decisions are being made by pompous wealthy men whose only worry is what color tie they want to wear to work.
Posted by: Sean | March 1, 2012, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
i can not believe how many men keep saying that the contraceptive pill is only for birth control.
women! please speak up louder!
Cysts!
Endometriosis!
severely painful periods!
as for the cost, omg, so do any men here really know how much their drugs cost when the don’t have health care?
my son found out when he had to go to th emergency room because he had a bike accident….he opted out of his work health care …… oh did he have sticker shock….
women, please check and see if you insurance policies cover vasectomies!
Posted by: mjbrin | March 1, 2012, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
This young lady has more class than to respond to a low-life sewer rat. He is just soiling himself in his own filth and the sight of this young lady excites him so much that he just can’t help restrain himself and therefore has to talk trash to cover up his “excitement” at the topic. Sewer rats will drown themselves in their own filth at some point, so way to go rush!
Posted by: karuna | March 1, 2012, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
how come rush doesn’t have any children?
i mean 4 marriages? how’d he do that?
did he pay for the wives pc pills? or did they find their own? maybe he has stock in the condom industry
maybe he had a vasectomy? did his insurance pay for it?
i wonder how much his drugs cost now.
Posted by: mjbrin | March 1, 2012, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
To me Jim Bob Jr sounds like a girl, or at least types like one.
The abortions performed due to “date rape” are so minuscule, you make it sound like all the women having abortions have been raped and that’s not the case. Who ever tries using that argument is being disingenuous.
I don’t hear anyone saying they want rape victims to keep the baby, there are many loving families that would love to adopt, that would be the right thing to do.
One last thing to ponder, if it’s illegal for me to destroy eagle eggs or sea turtle eggs what makes it okay to stop a human being?
Posted by: Scott | March 1, 2012, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Rush is simply saying, as only he can, that going to school is about learning. But your sex life is your personal and private business, which the government should have no say in it. Hopefully, your parents have taught you how to respect your most private parts and actions. Otherwise, if you need more money, either ask your parents or get a job…..like the rest of us do. Government is necessary only for those who cannot govern themselves.
Posted by: t | March 1, 2012, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
too much aspirin will kill her. his comment good for Playboy magazine
Posted by: rush | March 1, 2012, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
You disgusting Limbaugh followers probably kick puppies too. Disgusting what humanity has evolved into.
Posted by: DT | March 1, 2012, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
She had a right to birth control, just as she has the right to own a car or a home. But nobody should be required to buy it for her.
It’s the same with healthcare. You have the right to it, but not to tell doctors what they can charge for it, nor do the people in the class that don’t have thrones money for healthcare have the right to charge the class with the money for their healthcare.
Where is the equal protection under the law? How is one segment of the public responsible for the costs of another?
Mike
Posted by: Mike Schmidt | March 1, 2012, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
I am a man and I know if a woman starts to take birth control pills they come in 28 day cycle packs they have to take them daily it does not mean they have lots of sex I can’t believe we let Rush get away with calling this lady names and saying she is a prostitute I think he needs to be drug tested and taken off the air banned from speaking in public he is very dangerous to this country
Posted by: leslie | March 1, 2012, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Limbaugh is the perfect mascot for the GOP. He shows the world just how vile the Republican Party has become.
Posted by: thomas mc | March 1, 2012, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
I hope she sues his ass for slander. Keep talking about birth control, right wingers. We’ll see how many women agree with you come election time.
Posted by: Pill Poppin' Mama | March 1, 2012, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
Rush Limbaugh is a beautiful human being. It’s unfortunate, in a way, that he is unique, because we need many more like him. No one but Sandra the Flake should be required to pay for Sandra the Flake’s birth control.
Posted by: SCMark | March 1, 2012, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Thank God I am not a Liberal….here they want to make our hero’s in the military pay more for their health care and give this stupid punk free birth control! All you on the left are nuts…You are trying to run this GREAT country into the ground and I…as well as many others have had ENOUGH. If you had half a brain you would GET IT!
Posted by: DBARTIC | March 1, 2012, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Rush Limbaugh got a $400,000,000 contract with Clear Channel and a few months later Clear Channel fired 1,800 people to save $400,000,000. A couple of months later Rush Limbaugh made jokes on his radio show about him not feeling the recession. I’ll bet those 1,800 families are still feeling it. Limbaugh is disgusting. (being NBC is afraid of the biggist radio station owner in the world, it will be interesting to see if they post this).
Posted by: dan | March 1, 2012, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
We know how Obama feels about this issue–remember when he said he didn’t want his “daughters punished with a baby”. When he was a Chicago Senator Obama supported legislation which would have denied medical care to a baby that survived a botched abortion. So if you don’t give the baby medical care then what would you do?? Is this what the Democrats have been reduced to??
Posted by: whathappened08 | March 1, 2012, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Rush knows his audience and what he can get them to believe; which is anything he says. So he doesn’t need to be at all concerned about any kind of sanction.
Posted by: Gary DiNardo | March 1, 2012, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Wha..how-…whaaaaaat? Anyone who supports his comments is a goddamn moron. You don’t take a pill every time you have sex. You take one every day. God, you people are the reason the rest of the world hates us.
Posted by: Tara | March 1, 2012, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
1000 $ a year… that is the cost of the pill and beer & whip cream & cherrys i dont think that is so bad NOT
Posted by: dan | March 1, 2012, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Only a right wing nut case like Limbaugh would try to justify an all male panel trying to decide women’s birth control.
Posted by: whatever | March 1, 2012, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Isn’t It Ironic? The food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Department of Agriculture, asks us to “please do not feed the animals” because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves.
Posted by: Common _ Sense | March 1, 2012, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
It is difficult to believe that so many folks commenting here don’t understand about birth control prescription drugs.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 1, 2012, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
I know I’m in the minority in this discussion, but I don’t care. I believe that Mr. Limbaugh is a pompous a$$ who spins every fact to suit himself. I got disgusted listening to him several years ago, and have refused to listen to his nonsense ever since.
I also believe that every woman should have free access to birth control, period. I also believe that cancelling a few worthless government programs to pay for it would be a much better use of taxpayer’s dollars. The only involvement that the Catholic church and others that object to birth control would have is paying their taxes. I suspect such organizations would scream their heads off if such a plan were implemented, but on the other hand, women that belong to such organizations don’t have to request free birth control.
One more thing. People in this discussion are making fun of each other. I once made fun of an acquaintance many many years ago, and two days later he died of a heart attack. I still feel guilty about that, and I no longer make fun of anybody.
Charlie Brown
Posted by: Charlie Brown | March 1, 2012, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Too bad Rush’s mom didn’t have an aspirin.
Posted by: Sheila | March 1, 2012, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Why not provide all types of “free” medicine to everyone? Why stop at contraception? Why should millionaires and billionaires get “free” contraceptives? The inmates are truly running the asylum! Who would believe that the top topic for the 2012 Presidential cycle would be “FREE” contraceptives and not the out of control economy, wars in the Middle East, ballooning deficit spending and challenges to the founding principles of our country!
Posted by: Common _ Sense | March 1, 2012, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Many of you have missed the point. Although we can and should have a civil discussion about Fluke’s testimony, Limbaugh’s remarks are far beyond the pale. I am deeply offended by his remarks and his perverse attitude towards women. Limbaugh’s remarks along with Santorum’s ravings exemplify how removed Republicans are from the social main stream. Although I am an avowed moderate independent voter, I will have no difficulty pulling the straight Democratic lever this year.
Posted by: Steven | March 1, 2012, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Birth control is not just condoms it comes in many forms and is used for many different reasons. A one month supply of the pill can cost over a hundred dollars. I can no longer get pregnant, but still have to use birth control to keep my hormones level. They use birth control to regulate periods and also to control heavy bleeding and combat extreme pain that some women suffer with during a period. Using birth control does not make u slut . Rush is a bloated wind bag who has no business saying anything about birth control. As far as im concerned no man does. When they start bleeding once a month and have to deal with the pain and inconvenience that having a period causes, or when they can carry a child and give birth naturally then and only then will i give a damn about what a man thinks about birth control. To bad Rush’s mother didnt take birth control, hes one person the world would be better off without.
Posted by: kelli | March 1, 2012, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I am still confused on Ms Fluke’s math (I am no law student, though). Pills cost 50 bucks a month, 600/yr, 1800 for three years of law school. Or, you could pay for 5 years of pills in 3000.
Lets look at an alternative. Condoms cost 10 bucks/pack of 10 (or dollar a piece). That is 3000 condoms in 3 years. There are only 1096 days in 3 years (including a possible leap year)! That means the person has sex approximately 3 times a day every day regardless of whether you have the flu or are going through a period. That is a LOT of sex. What about the main purpose of being in law school i.e. studying the law?
Did Ms Fluke get into Georgetown Law on a fluke? Or does her quality of testimony reflect the average math capability of a Georgetown student?
Posted by: charlie sheen | March 1, 2012, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Call me dumb, but I grew up watching James Bond movies where he would have random sex with all kinds of women and leave them smiling. Men seemed to be able to flaunt their promiscuity and be viewed as more manly for it. If all these women, and the mistresses of our politicians, were not using birth control, would that be acceptable? Why is Rush so mad? He is the one percent and his insurance pays for ALL his medications, without passing judgment.
Posted by: Suzi | March 1, 2012, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Conservative comments seem to come in 3 flavors: Self-righteous, mean-spirited, or seriously dumb. No wonder you guys think Rush makes sense.
Posted by: Cassandra | March 1, 2012, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Rush is the poster child for why birth control is needed. Funny how the ones with so many ex-wives and former addictions are so high on morals. He is disgusting and will reap what he sows.
Women – we have to stick together. There are fools out here who really want to be able to make calls on what happens in a woman’s body without understand what they are talking about. If you use birth control you’re a slut and the people who pay should be allowed to watch you have sex? I know you want to see the pap smears of ALL the women who use birth control pills. They can be broadcast in 3D. Might as well get your money’s worth, since I’m sure you’re just going broke watching your money fly away with every prescription.
Posted by: Tribeca | March 1, 2012, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
If there was ever any question in our minds, this latest tirade from Limbaugh certainly leaves no doubt as to his substandard IQ (his total lack of knowledge about the female body and how birth control pills work) and his misogynist attitude toward women, especially intelligent women. His remarks were not only alarmingly and shockingly stupid — any junior high age kid would be able to correct him — but also hateful, spiteful, disgusting, defamatory and slanderous. Anyone who admits to agreeing with his obnoxiousness is revealing a great deal about themselves and it isn’t pretty!
Posted by: Joyce | March 1, 2012, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Insurance companies will cover fertility medications for people who want to get pregnant, but can get away with no cover contraceptives for those who don’t. There are probably as many married women on birth control simply because having a child doesn’t fit into their current family situation at this time as there are unmarried women. There are many, many women who must use birth control pills for hormonal regulation to treat serious conditions. The insurance companies don’t care if a woman has to take them because without them she bleeds heavily for 25 days out of the month or is so overwhelmed with pain that she misses a week or more of work every month. Next thing you know, they will want to deny insurance coverage for hysterectomies because they think women just want to get rid of the uterus just so they won’t get pregnant. What? Your body is infested with tumors that are growing because your hormones cause them to? Put an aspirin between your legs, you SLUT! I am one of those women who needed birth control for hormonal regulation, and you know what, conservatives? I’m a virgin who now will never have the opportunity to have a child.
Posted by: julsny | March 1, 2012, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Limbaugh is correct. And it is funny too. Sandra Fluke’s sanctimonious, solipsistic comments before Congress were like some hilarious caricature of an entitled academic airhead.
Posted by: hard johnson | March 1, 2012, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Why is it the folks ranting against this young lady have such a hard time understanding the article. So many of them say something like $3000 a year! I guess reading comprehension was not one of their subjects in school. Their hero, RL, said distinctly in the article: “Three thousand dollars for birth control in three years? That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex”
Just shows the level of intelligence of some of these uniformed people is a result of very very poor reading habits!
Posted by: Mad Dog | March 1, 2012, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
“Limbaugh is correct. And it is funny too. Sandra Fluke’s sanctimonious, solipsistic comments before Congress were like some hilarious caricature of an entitled academic airhead.”
POSTED BY: HARD JOHNSON
Absolutely. It is is funny (but still perhaps sad) when pompous people such as Sandra Fluke can no way, no how see how childishly stupid they are.
Posted by: michael stanton | March 1, 2012, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
I really can’t believe that Rush is getting $400 million over 8 years for his brand of uneducated tirades. Seriously, talk radio is getting is paying him around a million a week to spew hatred? How do they ever get enough ads to pay his pay, in his time slot? Is someone else fronting the money for him to continue to dumb down his listeners?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 1, 2012, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
“I do believe, however, that if she can’t afford contraception, then perhaps she might consider less banging. Simple solution. Very obvious, since banging isn’t a “right”, but just a hobby.”
POSTED BY: LIBRARIAN53
Here you actually make sense. Congrats to you.
Posted by: Once in a lifetime | March 1, 2012, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Have any of you actually taken birth control pills? You don’t take more pills to have more sex. One pill a day, one package per month.
Clearly the majority of you missed health class in 8th grade…
Posted by: Sami | March 1, 2012, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Um… really? “so much sex that she must be doing some freaky stuff”? You do know how birth control works right? You have to take it everyday for at least a month before it provides effective at preventing pregnancy and you have to continue to take it. So, someone could be having sex once every six months or three times a day and they would have to take the same amount and pay as much for it. The whole “So much sex, she can’t afford it” is not a valid argument. It is all or nothing. Not to mention that the girl’s point was her friend that has to take it to prevent cysts. My sister has been taking birth control since she was 16 not because she was having sex, but because her periods are unbearably painful without it.
Posted by: K | March 1, 2012, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
“I really can’t believe that Rush is getting $400 million over 8 years for his brand of uneducated tirades.”
POSTED BY: LIBRARIAN53
More amazing still: Obama got elected president. But he won’t get re-elected.
Posted by: green goddess | March 1, 2012, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
What I can’t believe is the number of people here who can’t read. For all you illiterates calling Sandra Fluke a slut or making snide comments about her Georgetown education, perhaps you should go back to school. She did NOT say it cost $3,000 a year to pay for birth control. She said it COULD cost an UNINSURED person $3,000 over THREE years to pay for birth control. She also never said that she can’t afford to pay for birth control. She simply pointed out the fact that it can be expensive.
Birth control costs the same amount of money per whether you’re having sex once a month or once a day. If you don’t want insurance to pay for birth control, then get ready to pay child support. I can’t even believe this is an issue.
Finally, Rush Limbaugh’s comments are totally and completely out of line. They are insensitive, sexist, and offensive. Maybe men should keep an aspirin between THEIR legs. That would work just as effectively.
Posted by: Natalie | March 1, 2012, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
While looking to see how Clear Channel, Limbaugh’s employer can afford to pay him a $50 million a year I learned some interesting facts. Clear Channel is a the largest radio station group owner in the U.S.
In 2008 two private equity firms bought out the company and announced plans to go private. One of those firms was Bain Capital, Romney’s old firm. All of the tv stations were sold as well as 161 radio stations. In 2009 Clear Channel announced it was facing bankruptcy because of crippling debt. They laid off 2400 employees soon after announcing Limbaugh’s $400 million 8 year contract.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 1, 2012, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
Posted by: WHAT I WANT | March 1, 2012, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
$3000 a year for contraceptives? Right. Not.
Posted by: just the facts | March 1, 2012, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
So the fellow who had his own little blue pill scandal is now upset a woman wants birth control? LOL! Tell you what limpbaugh, you buy the aspirin for her and we’ll by you some tongue depressors for you!
Posted by: Joe Regualr Guy | March 1, 2012, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
“While looking to see how Clear Channel, Limbaugh’s employer can afford to pay him a $50 million a year…blah, whine, and blah…”
POSTED BY: LIBRARIAN53
Still bitter about the failure of msnbc and air america? LOL!
Posted by: jack spratt | March 1, 2012, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
I wonder if all the people who think the “aspirin between a woman’s knees” birth control joke is so hilarious instead of tasteless and offensive…
I wonder if they would find it funny to use a woman’s swift knee between a man’s legs as contraception. It’s even cheaper than aspirin.
Rush’s comments were slanderous, tacky, sexist, hypocritical, ill-informed, hateful, and ugly. Calling a woman a slut and a prostitute because she wants the health insurance she pays for to cover her health care needs, is the behavior of a high school bully, and anyone who defends his comments, you’re cheering for a big fat bully that picks on girls. Be proud.
Ms. Fluke pays fees to Georgetown, presumably a student health fee that isn’t cheap. She deserves to be covered for prescription contraception if she needs or wants it, and her medical need should be determined by her doctor. I have yet to hear one of these commentators blast coverage for erectile aid prescriptions, whereby the male (who is never branded a “slut”) does have to take more the more sex he wants to have (unlike hormonal birth control, taken once daily, and not necessarily so the woman can have sex.)
Nor have the commentators objected that health coverage pays for pregnancy and childbirth,which can cost upwards of $10,000 for a single occurrence even without complications, much more than several years of birth control. I am sure this is why most health plans–those without women-oppressing “moral” objections, already provide contraception coverage.
That said, I think the solution for Ms. Fluke is to be on her parents’ health insurance or buy her own, and be exempted from having to pay for Georgetown’s health plan because it does not meet her needs.
-MG
Posted by: MG | March 1, 2012, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
I’m a nice married lady who pays for my own insurance out of pocket. My insurance does not cover prescriptions. The only birth control that works for me without causing severe nausea is called Nuva Ring and it costs $68-87 a month. Over the course of a college education it would easily cost $3000. Google it.
Drugs are drugs, and what happens between a woman and her doctor is none of your damn business. Cover all prescriptions equally or not at all. You don’t hear me complaining about the expensive statin drugs you need because you ate like crap your whole life? Not even your spendy chemo therapy required because you chose to be a smoker and now you’re dying of cancer.
I was ignoring this story until a friend pointed out how ugly many of the comments were. I am disgusted and horrified at many of your reactions more than I could ever be disturbed by that silly blowhard of a man.
Posted by: Francesca | March 1, 2012, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Does Mr. Limbaugh really not understand that you take the same number of birth control pills whether you have sex twice daily or twice monthly?
Posted by: dave bruns | March 1, 2012, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Thanks MG, despite your intentions, your self-righteous and pompous book cracked me up.
Posted by: can we laugh now | March 1, 2012, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
My daughter takes the birth control pill Loestrin-FE because it alleviates the severe menstrual cramps and the heavy bleeding associated with it. Instead of missing 1-2 days of school every month, as she was before she got on the pill, she is now able to function and deal with her periods. She is a senior in high school and both of her parents approve. It also costs $87 per month if you do not have insurance. The $1000 annual cost is right in the ballpark.
Rush Limbaugh should be prosecuted for a hate crime for his abusive comments directed toward this student. I hope this will be the comment that drives this disgusting misogynist off the air and back to whatever rat hole he climbed out of.
Posted by: The Crank | March 1, 2012, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Rush got himself publicity, it’s what the living large junkie does. With respect to the many uninformed GOP supporters posting here, as a retired medical practitioner I can verify that the pill is often prescribed for medical reasons not simply as a form of contraception. I am actually surprised at the absence of knowledge on this subject by those posting in opposition. As well, having men discuss women’s issues is akin to asking an auto mechanic to fix your plumbing.
Posted by: Icky | March 1, 2012, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
These same ignoramuses have no problem with ED pills being covered by ALL insurance policies, including MEDICARE. And the policies pay for them no matter the reason, which is why millions of men take them to improve their sexual performance and satisfaction. I think Rush is missing a few brains cells from all his drug use.
Posted by: Bobby Jo | March 1, 2012, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
Limpuke is nothing but a Rich Puppet. He is controlled by those who made him. Puppet on a string
Posted by: jay | March 1, 2012, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Posted by: Icky | March 1, 2012, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
I am happy that you do not practice Medicine anymore. Ignorant people like you are doing the damage to this country. Have you read or listened to Ms. fluke’s testimony before hitting the keyboard.
She mentioned in her testimony that Georgetown does provide coverage for birth control:
” A friend of mine, for example, has polycystic ovarian syndrome
and has to take prescription birth control to stop cysts from growing on her ovaries.
Her prescription is technically covered by Georgetown insurance because it’s not
intended to prevent pregnancy.”
Men are discussing women issues, because it is a pocketbook issue too plus govt is mandating to private organizations, private citizens & religious organizations (against abortions) what to cover and how much to charge. Do you think Insurance company will cover this for free or the government (Assuming single payer). Who would pay for the cost?
Some of the ignorant fools comparing ED pills to birth control pills.
Posted by: Dennis | March 1, 2012, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Contraceptives aren’t just for sex. For the past few years, I’ve been on birth control because during my cycle I suffer from serious cramps that on several occasion have on several occasions sent me to the hospital. Before I was prescribed birth control, I had to take tranquilizers. The pill is a medicine just like any other pill. The notion that sluts and prostitutes use it because they have so much sex is absolutely outlandish. I’d also like to point out that Miss Fluke wasn’t saying that she personally paid $3k a year, she was saying an uninsured person POTENTIALLY could.
Posted by: norah | March 1, 2012, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
She and her classmates should to call his bluff and ask for him to provide a ton of aspirin. Let it begin to hurt his pocketbook.
Posted by: Whatever | March 1, 2012, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Wow, lots of juvenile posting tonight. No one ever said anything about the government providing free contraceptives to everyone, or on the taxpayers’ dime. No more than has been done for decades via Medicaid.
Posted by: Don | March 1, 2012, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Rush Limbaugh has his moment. Time for him to retire.
Posted by: James Crafford | March 1, 2012, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Norah is telling the absolute truth. Many women have to take prescribed contraceptives for endometriosis, severe bleeding or cramps, and many other conditions. Many married women with families have to take them.
Posted by: Cynics rule | March 1, 2012, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Rush Limbaugh has his moment. Time for him to retire.
POSTED BY: JAMES CRAFFORD
You misspelled “Obama” terribly. But yeah, Obama should retire.
Posted by: james spader | March 1, 2012, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
“to post moronic childish comments.”
POSTED BY: JIM
No, seriously, JIM, these people defending Fluke’s stupid monologue are for real, or at least as real as such folks can be.
Posted by: jasmine c | March 1, 2012, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
“to post moronic childish comments.”
POSTED BY: JIM
“No, seriously, JIM, these people defending Fluke’s stupid monologue are for real, or at least as real as such folks can be.”
It may be absurd, but these people advocating taxpayer subsidized promiscuity are actually serious.
Posted by: janet brewster | March 2, 2012, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Regardless of your social conscious on contraception, we should as citizens of this great nation have mutual respect for our fellow citizens. Without that basic tenant, we lose the glue that holds any great society together.
We are all entitled to our opinions, and we have in this great country the right to speak freely. However, we are not protected from the consequences of those words.
However much you disagree with Ms. Fluke, she was fully respectful of her audience and venue, when she spoke on Capitol Hill. Most people will agree that Rush Limbaugh’s words were malicious, inflammatory, and disrespectful.
Posted by: Common_Denominator | March 2, 2012, 12:07 am 12:07 am
“Contraceptives aren’t just for sex…”
POSTED BY: NORAH
And enemas aren’t just for fun.
Posted by: jim | March 2, 2012, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Rush Limbaugh has the conscience of a pig, but lacks its intelligence. I expect nothing from him, but I strongly condemn the silence and capitulation of those who sponsor his vile and vicious tirades. Premier Radio should fire him and offer apologies for his attack on Ms. Fluke. My preference is the way of the old west. “Hang ‘im, boys! It’ll teach him not to mess with the women folk.”
Posted by: Samm Dickens | March 2, 2012, 12:12 am 12:12 am
“…she was fully respectful of her audience and venue…”
POSTED BY: COMMON_DENOMINATOR
Get real. She was a laughably self-righteous and disingenuous airhead. Super obvious.
Posted by: jinx it | March 2, 2012, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Jim, you don’t believe that contraceptives are prescribed for medical conditions? Many women use them to combat painful periods, hormonal imbalances, ovarian cysts, and a variety of other things.
Common Denominator, your post is my favorite by far and I agree absolutely. Even when you disagree with a person’s views, you should still be respectful towards them. Limbaugh comments (and many comments on this site!) were misogynistic and unnecessary. It’s possible to argue one’s point without stooping to such lows. I can’t believe he called her a prostitute. That’s so hateful.
Posted by: Norah | March 2, 2012, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Sorry meant to say “basic tenet” not “basic tenant”
—
Regardless of your social conscious on contraception, we should as citizens of this great nation have mutual respect for our fellow citizens. Without that basic tenet, we lose the glue that holds any great society together.
We are all entitled to our opinions, and we have in this great country the right to speak freely. However, we are not protected from the consequences of those words.
However much you disagree with Ms. Fluke, she was fully respectful of her audience and venue, when she spoke on Capitol Hill. Most people will agree that Rush Limbaugh’s words were malicious, inflammatory, and disrespectful.
Posted by: Common_Denominator | March 2, 2012, 12:18 am 12:18 am
Jim, you don’t believe that contraceptives are prescribed for medical conditions? Many woman use them for hormonal imbalances, painful periods, ovarian cysts and so on and so forth.
Common Denominator, I agree completely. I think Miss Fluke has handled these attacks gracefully. Shame on Limbaugh for making such unnecessary and misogynistic comments. He should be able to argue his point without stooping to such lows.
Posted by: norah | March 2, 2012, 12:21 am 12:21 am
I don’t agree with Obama’s version of healthcare which provides free contraception nor do I agree with the government denying contraception. Contraception, or any other facet of human reproduction, is not the business of government. Doing so is an invasion of privacy.
Posted by: john locke | March 2, 2012, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Not to mention an erosion of freedom and liberty. How dare the government to even consider such things. They are way off base.
Posted by: john locke | March 2, 2012, 1:23 am 1:23 am
JOHN LOCKE, you say “How dare the government to even consider such things.” What such things? You said you don’t agree with the government providing free contraception and then you said you don’t agree with the government denying contraception. You kinda left the government with little opportunity for reaching agreement with you. And then you blame the government for “an erosion of freedom and liberty.” I don’t think you’re making an honest effort here, JOHN. You seem to kinda have it in for the government, especially when you go so far as to see the government’s efforts to provide health care for women in equality with men as an abrogation of freedom and liberty. I think your namesake would be saddened by your attitude.
Posted by: Samm Dickens | March 2, 2012, 1:40 am 1:40 am
While it is true that contraceptive pills can be used to treat other medical conditions such as ovarian cysts, controling menstrul cyles, etc. (and the Catholic Chruch does say it’s all right if they used SOLELY to treat those medical conditions), they are NOT cures for those conditions, nor are they the only medical methods for treating those conditions. The proof is that once you get off them, your symptoms flare up again. So Sandra Fluke’s friend who had ovarian cysts may still have had to undergo ovarian surgery even if she was prescribed brith control pills. Also, let’s not forget that birth control pills, patches, rings and injections do run the risk of causing blod clots, strokes, cancer and infertility.
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Limbaugh points out the absurd by being absurd. Liberals think everything has to through the federal government. The Democrats were the ones talking about contraceptives not whether they are for medicinal purposes. Democrats were the ones saying Republicans were trying to deny woman access to contraceptives. Limbaugh knows how the pill works. He was doing the math on a cheaper birth control method because cost seemed to be such a factor. The other point he was making is government does not have the right to tell a private company what products or services they can offer. If liberals are so concerned, then start your own insurance company and provide all the services you would like to provide. You liberals always like to use other people’s money tobe generous. It is so fun to see you liberals get your feathers ruffled. Another successful “Media tweak of the day”. Limbaugh gets to the core by being entertaining and you liberals who think you are so smart just don’t get it.
Posted by: LIBERALS DONT GET IT | March 2, 2012, 2:21 am 2:21 am
Will the people who post here please read the facts before posting!! I see post after post asserting that Ms. Fluke wants you, the taxpayer, to pay for her birth control. Limbaugh got that wrong and so so do you. She testified that her privately-purchased insurance wasn’t covering it, and that it should. Almost all insurance covers birth control.
Posted by: Research before posting | March 2, 2012, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Look at all the men harassing this woman online. You people are scum. Limbaugh is a disgrace to the county and the posters on here calling this woman names…I want your address.
Posted by: Jay | March 2, 2012, 3:00 am 3:00 am
Has Rush been doctor shopping again? Can we get him another 60 days in rehab? Oh, wait. Can’t afford that since he has alimony for 3 ex wives not to mention the serial shopper he’s married to now. Four wives and no children. Hmmmmm, could the marriages be a cover up for being in the closet?
Posted by: howdymo1 | March 2, 2012, 3:33 am 3:33 am
BTW, here’s some figures based on Planned Parenthood’s own website regarding the average costs AND usages of various birth control and conctraceptives:
“CycleBeads” — $14 a unit, 1 unit per year, good for up to 2 years.
IUD — $700, 1 unit per year, good for up to 10 years
Condoms — $1.25 per unit, 100 units per year ($125 total)
Spermicides — $1.80 per unit, 100 units per year ($180 total)
Shot/”DemoProvera” — $50 per unit, 4 units per year ($200 total)
Oral Contraceptives — $30 per unit, 13 units per year ($390 total)
“NuvaRing” — $30 per unit, 13 units per year ($390 total)
The Patch — $30 per unit, 13 units per year ($390 total)
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 4:02 am 4:02 am
This woman redefines the word PIG. She can afford to go to one of the most expensive schools on the ENTIRE PLANET and wants OTHER PEOPLE to pay for her contraception?? Shows why we need to end insurance for routine medical care, end insurance mandates, and put people into medical savings accounts.
Posted by: Joseph | March 2, 2012, 4:47 am 4:47 am
“Women aren’t entitled to be sexual beings without being regarded in degrading terms???”
Absolutely, they are.
Are they entitled to have others pay for it? or to demand in public that others pay for it? Absolutely not.
Assuming Fluke’s “friend” wasn’t a complete fabrication, my heart goes out to her and her family. And yet, at the same time, if she was attending Georgetown, she was choosing other priorities apart from paying for that birth control Fluke claims she so desperately needed.
This is not a public or taxpayer issue.
Posted by: sigh | March 2, 2012, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Just reading these comments…makes me lose all hope for this country…
Posted by: Ed | March 2, 2012, 6:44 am 6:44 am
“testifies she’s having so much sex she can’t afford her own birth control pills” This sentence doesn’t make ANY sense. The # of birth control pills you take isn’t correlated with the amount of sex you have. This man is an idiot. And he has to be really bad, when he makes me agree with Nancy Pelosi.
Posted by: wryview | March 2, 2012, 7:18 am 7:18 am
The remarks make Limbaugh look like an idiot. All other issues aside, the amount females pay for oral contraceptives does not fluctuate based on the amount of sex they may be having. All other medical uses aside, this fact alone negates his argument. He has been irrelevant since his drug days anyway. That sort of blatant hypocrisy softens any real impact he could ever have on anyone who is actually paying attention.
Posted by: dwf | March 2, 2012, 7:20 am 7:20 am
This is some real crap! The libs are pulling out all the stop’s! It is pretty dispicable! I don’t feel it is our responcibility to pay for peoples condoms! They knew this would set off the right! I happy in the middle!!
Posted by: nikki | March 2, 2012, 7:28 am 7:28 am
I wonder if Rush feels the same way about prescription coverage for Viagara as he does for birth control. Where are those videos Rush?
Posted by: DMarie | March 2, 2012, 7:36 am 7:36 am
Rush is right. I’ve been married to my wife for 30 years and during the years she took birth control , covered by our insurance, we had lots of sex. All over the house and in tents when we went camping. Rush is right, we need to put an end to marital sex as it is destroying America.
Posted by: kevin | March 2, 2012, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Limbaugh must be feeling like he’s not getting enough attention, what with all the Republican candidate’s headline-making nonsense lately, so he’s decided to outdo them in the outrageous department. But he leapt solar systems with his contention that having insurance-covered birth control is the same as being paid for sex.
The Republicans SHOULD denounce his outrageous statements, but they won’t, at least not publicly. But by not doing so they continue to let that publicity-seeking nutcase drive their agenda. After November he’ll be pushing hard for impeachment – will they follow him then? It worked so well the last time.
Posted by: Maria | March 2, 2012, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Here’s one of the main fallacies of the whole government run health care issue. The private market would develop insurance products that provide expanded coverage for contraceptives for those who believe they would like this coverage if only the state and federal governments would get out of their way. The real culprit here is not Rush Limbaugh or any other conservative or progressive pundit, it’s the arrogance of a federal government whobelieves that only the government knows what’s right for the American people. Expand HSA’s, allow people to buy health insurance over state lines, do away with mandates and curtail the waste and abuse of the current lawsuit lottery mentality of the tort lawyers and you’d see lower prices, better coverage and expanded medical services. The gov’t killed the housing industry which led directly to the current sorry economic state. If given the chance, they’ll destroy health care as well.
Posted by: BubblerDad | March 2, 2012, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Hope Limbaugh chokes on his vitriol.
Posted by: Christine | March 2, 2012, 8:23 am 8:23 am
This guy is a bigot. He doesn’t care about women. He just puts them down, wants them to be second class citizens. Like you women don’t matter. Like you don’t make up more than half of this great nation? Government of the United States of Men. He’s the kind of guy that would beat his wife as fast as he’d have sex with her and force her to get pregnant. CAN’T YOU SEE THAT?
Posted by: Scott | March 2, 2012, 8:24 am 8:24 am
LMFAO! Some of you are so ignorant it’s laughable…..You think the only use for birth control pills is to prevent pregnancies? Guess what? You’re wrong! I started taking it when I was 20 because I was having irregular bleeding, cramps, missing my period all together, etc. I was NOT having sex with ANYONE because I think it should be something you only do with someone you LOVE. Oh and my insurance pays for most of it…..I guess I’m a slut, right? Morons…………………………
Posted by: S | March 2, 2012, 8:37 am 8:37 am
It’s just sad that birth control wasn’t as widely available for Rush Limbaugh’s mother……..
Posted by: judysworld | March 2, 2012, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Prior to hearing Limbaugh, I was on the fence about contraceptives. After hearing Limbaugh it reminded me of days of the past where male bigotry towards women was perfectly ok. Of husbands that beat wives for not “obeying”. Of lack of understanding what it means to live life as a woman instead of a man. Of male sexual narcissism that leads down paths where women are overwhelmingly the victims of sexual abuse. Before I was on the fence, now I’m clearly on the side of women and sponsoring contraceptives. Rush, you’re a FAIL!
Posted by: Scotti | March 2, 2012, 8:40 am 8:40 am
If this woman wants tax payers to pay for her birth control, then we should also get a say so in her sex life. And I would say, quit having sex. There are other medicines other than birth control designed to help the issues she cited, however birth control is the only one that gives you the convenience of the possibility of not getting pregnant as well, which tells me you are having sex. Rush has too much common sense for most of you to understand.
Posted by: Jennifer | March 2, 2012, 8:40 am 8:40 am
“I will buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want,” he said…..
I think women would be satisfied with just having the birth control pills, Mighty kind of you, tho.
Posted by: Christine | March 2, 2012, 8:41 am 8:41 am
>”… what should be expected is for Republican leaders to stand up and say they don’t want him to defend them anymore.”
Why would you expect immoral people to do the moral thing? The lies are convenient for them. Haven’t you ever heard of divide and conquer? They split small groups off from the whole, we fight each other and they end up with the power. Asking them to condemn Rush on this is like expecting them to tell Rush to condemn the lady that enslaved her help for 6 years.
Posted by: David J. Conklin | March 2, 2012, 8:42 am 8:42 am
dont forget this isn’t just birth control for her, it’s birth control for ALL women, including married women. ANd ‘birth control’ is HORMONE THERAPY that helps with many many many things in a women’s menstrual cycle problems and plenty ofwomen who do not have sex at all, take birth control pills so they can not have the effects of their period deride them every month for a week! I would LOVE for someone to give Rush the symptoms of a menstrual cycle every three weeks and see if he isn’t running to his doctor seeking some help!! And then have some women call him names over the radio because of it. He has NO IDEA why this women is taking hormone therapy. He is vile and disgusting and a women hater. Funny how ugly men tend to hate women when women being repulsed by them is their own fault.
Posted by: Sally the sassy | March 2, 2012, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Speaker John Boehner needs to grow a spine and condemn these remarks on the House floor – immediately. It is unthinkable that anyone would be permitted to publicly defame a person who has been called to testify before congress – and to do so in such a despicable manner. Please Mr. Boehner – set this right.
Posted by: Eric | March 2, 2012, 8:44 am 8:44 am
I can’t help but wonder:
A. What sort of man marries a Bridezilla
and
B. What sort of woman marries someone like Limbaugh
Posted by: Christine | March 2, 2012, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Rush Limbaugh should be suspended for his derogatory and slanderous remarks. NOTHING LESS will do. When Ed Schultz said something mean about, I believe Laura Ingraham, HE suspended himself for saying something that was against his own principles. THAT was a class act. I honestly doubt Rush can do that – he has not a class bone in his body. I hope Gloria Allred has contacted this young lady about a lawsuit.
Posted by: pksk531 | March 2, 2012, 8:45 am 8:45 am
WOULD NEVER PAY FOR MY DAUGHHTERS PILLS WHY WOULD I PAY FOR YOURS?—— She’s in law school, so her undergrad degree is already done and she’ smart enough and successful enough to be accepted in one of the top law schools in the country. My guess – she’s alot smarter than you and will have a much more lucrative career and future than you, so i’d try to protect that and tell her to double down on her birth control if she has a boy friend – use the pill and a condom every single time!!! 2 – she may suffer bad menstrual cycles and with the work load of law school, you dont get to walk around in pain for a week every three weeks distracting you from your work. She may need the hormone therapy.l 3 – She is probably around 25 years old. By 25 my mother had 3 or 4 kids and plenty of sex. She’s of fine age to have sexual relationships with men, and i dont want her marrying as a virgin. I want her to know what she wants in a man when she gets married and I want her knowing everything there is to kno wabout that man including his sexuality and how he is intimately. I dont want her to marry anyone unless she knows him sexually and in every other way. many reasons. many.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Rush has faded into obscurity and needed to get back in the spotlight. Anything he says is to get people riled up. Instead of using his voice to promote peace and compromise, he uses it to promote anger, hatred and division. Typical Rush — yawn.
Posted by: carole | March 2, 2012, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Laughing at the ones saying, “hey if she can’t afford birth control then don’t have sex” LOL Ok nevermind her, YOU quit having sex. Ever. In fact, go down and have your sex organs removed since you feel so strongly against one of the most fundamental and pleasurable of all human activities. Since God gave you these organs and made it pleasurable, intimate and joyous, rather than just functional, renounce God while you’re at it! And if you’re a female supporting comments made by this BIGOT Limbaugh who can’t keep a wife, renounce yourself!
Posted by: Scotti | March 2, 2012, 8:50 am 8:50 am
. What sort of woman marries someone like Limbaugh— gold digger. and I bet he knows it, which is why he hates women so much. Women are repulsed by him because he’s disgusting and vile, and he hates them for it. Vicious cycle.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 8:52 am 8:52 am
I will personally pay for this woman to have birth control as long as she has sex with me, and no one but me, for as long as I’m paying for it.
Posted by: mojo | March 2, 2012, 8:54 am 8:54 am
This whole idea of buying somebody else birth control could lead to some interesting comparisons – ratings if you will. Instead of, “Is she is a 10…or an 8?” it would be she is a 1K or 3K girl? Has this woman and others like her no shame? The fact that she can go public and make such a requests makes me wonder about her upbringing. Mom and dad must be sooooo pround. It is not MY responsibilty to make sure her sexual urges are fulfilled.
Posted by: MIke | March 2, 2012, 8:54 am 8:54 am
No one is saying she can’t have birth control. Just pay for it herself. Sex is a choice.
Posted by: lgccac | March 2, 2012, 8:54 am 8:54 am
This is not about PUBLIC TAXPAYER funding of birth control. Fluke simply wants access to insurance that covers all medical needs. She doesn’t want the taxpayer to pay for it. She would be perfectly happy purchasing this insurance were it available at reasonable cost outside of the employer-mandated system we have. However, because our crazy health care system requires employers to provide insurance (which is completely ludicrous, but we are in this situaltion because of the right’s resistance to any kind of move toward a system that doesn’t require employers foot the bill) we are all reduced to needing to beg our employers to cover our needs. The federal government simply must enforce a baseline of care, otherwise employers could just provide minimal insufficient policies to meet their mandate, and Americans would not be getting the health care they need. This baseline includes contraceptives. Contraceptives protect womens health, and prevent unplanned pregnancy. Guess what – even married people use them – not just single, morally bankrupt, women. Oh and why is this always blamed on women? Who are they having sex with anyway??
Posted by: Robin | March 2, 2012, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I don’t understand why no one is getting to the real issue. the catholic hospitals are accepting government money to run there hospital, but do not want to provide coverage for something that is commonly covered on normal insurance. it is not an issue of religious persecution. if they don’t want to provide contraception, stop taking government money. Taxpayers aren’t paying for her contraception. They are paying for the running of these hospitals to be run. Her insurance pays for her contraception. All of this other stuff is smoke and mirrors by religious conservatives to cry religious persecution and sidetrack from issues that really matter in an election year. and as far as calling this women names, there is more reasons to take birth control than preventing pregnancy. And if you as taxpayers don’t want to pay for her contraception, why not make her insurance provided by the catholic hospitals pay for it? People need to know the facts of this story, instead of listening to a few people spouting untruths. Grow up, people! We aren’t in grade school anymore, and we don’t solve anything by believing the school bully(Rush Limbaugh), and then call this girl names!
Posted by: poni | March 2, 2012, 8:57 am 8:57 am
“Rush Limbaugh has the conscience of a pig..”
POSTED BY: SAMM DICKENS
LOL. And that makes Fluke’s conscience what? That of a maggot? A centipede?
Posted by: charles dickens | March 2, 2012, 8:58 am 8:58 am
It is not MY responsibilty to make sure her sexual urges are fulfilled.—WHY IS MEN’s IMPOTENCY DRUGS COVERED FOR UNMARRIED MEN?????????????????????? YOU ARE PAYING FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE SEX>>>YOU PAY FOR MEN TO HAVE SEX REGARDLESS OF IF THEY ARE MARRIED OR NOT!!THAT IS THE WHOLE point! DISCRIMINATION!!!!!
Posted by: Sally the sassy | March 2, 2012, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Wow. Everybody needs to take a step back and calm down. Try counting to 10 like some of you had to do in grade school. This is why I am an Independent. I vote on issues not what the pundits say. I pay $400 more a month now for health insurance than I did 3 years ago for the same coverage. I am 31 and am as middle class as they come. All this fighting doesn’t get anything done, just causes the hate to grow. We should talk about what we can do FOR our country together not what we can GET from our country.
Posted by: Rick | March 2, 2012, 8:59 am 8:59 am
“Hope Limbaugh chokes on his vitriol.”
POSTED BY: CHRISTINE
Hope Ms. Fluke chokes on something else. LOL.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 9:01 am 9:01 am
THE ‘LITTLE BLUE PILL’ IS COVERED BY HEALTH INSURANCE FOR MEN!!!!! YOU ALL DO PAY FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE SEX, FOR UNMARRIED PEOPLE TO HAVE SEX………….MEN. APPARENTLY IT IS FINE TO PAY FOR UNMARRIED MEN TO HAVE SEX. BUT NOT WOMEN. IF IT’S A WOMEN ,SHE IS DENIED HEALTHCARE, CALLED NAMES ON THE RADIO, WHILE THE MEN PICK UP THE PRESCRIPTIONS EVERYDAY AND HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE PAY FOR THEM TO HAVE SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE HYPOCRACY AND DOUBLE STANDARD IS THE ENTIRE ISSUE HERE!!! THIS IS NOTHING SIMPLE THAN SEXISM AND DISCRIMINATION!!! PERIOD! REPUBLICANS = WOMEN HATER’S CLUE!
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 9:02 am 9:02 am
OK. So he’s losing it. Aspirin between the legs? Tell me what the hell “having so much six you can’t afford birth control” means? Is he implying she’s paying for sex??? Limbaugh has said some stupid things over the years, but this one takes the cake.
Posted by: Wanda McAlvey | March 2, 2012, 9:05 am 9:05 am
As I have always said, Republicans are not only racist, homophobic, xenophobes, extreme and ignorant but also SEXIST, unless women do as they say. They are the American version of the Taliban.
Posted by: Don | March 2, 2012, 9:06 am 9:06 am
We should talk about what we can do FOR our country—HOW ABOUT STOP CRAPPING ON WOMEN!!!!! Women have a emnstrual cycle every month!!! there a billion issues that go along with that and hormone therapy helps with ALOT of them. HOrmone therapy ALSO stops you from getting pregnant! BECAUSE the right wants to be control women, oppress them, they do things like this, like call her names and a slut while unmarried men are being paid by insurance companies tohave sex every day!!!!! Sometimes when you rope the black man to truck and drag him through the street you NEED thegovernment to say “NO THAT IS JUST WRONG!” this is one of those times. She should sue him for defamation of character on the air, he has NO IDEA why she’s taking birth control ! When someone ASSAULTS a women and thinks that’s ok, because she MIGHT be having sex, and if a single women is having sex then, hey, all bets are off, she has NO VALUE as a human being, when do the good men of this country stand up and say “THAT IS JUST WRONG!!!” BE MEN! stand up to this creep!
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
POSTED BY: WHAT I WANT
Yes, I want and demand a new sports car, to help improve my sex life, which will surely be covered.
Posted by: felix hornblower | March 2, 2012, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Let’s see…Conservatives don’t want to pay for birth control, don’t want to pay to support mothers and children on welfare, and are against abortion. They want their way, where all 3 issues are concerned, and as a result, they’ll never get their way, where ANY of these issues are concerned.
Guess I can’t blame them for all their hyperventilating.
Posted by: Christine | March 2, 2012, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Why do people think birth control = promiscuity? Do people really think that anyone , ANYONE, right or left , truly practices sex for procreation only? I don’t think John Boehner, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, OK, maybe Rick Santorum, Rush Limbaugh really is abstinent except for procreation. So young married couples, people whose kid’s are grown, – no sex for you, unless your employer approves you to have birth control. This is the biggest bit of hypocrisy I’ve seen in a long time. I want all those republican men to stop having sex right now, unless they want a baby.
Posted by: Robin | March 2, 2012, 9:10 am 9:10 am
The list doesn’t end with contraceptions.
I know people who don’t have dental. Or if they have dental it pays a max of $1000. So when your dental bill is $4000 – you pay $3000 out of your pocket.
If you go on down the list of things in life that cost money – who’s going to pay for it?
If the answer is the government, let me tell you, contraceptions are the tip of the iceberg.
There are a lot of big nasty bills you can get in life, and the Nancy Pelosi needs to start cutting checks.
Posted by: Robert | March 2, 2012, 9:13 am 9:13 am
I wonder what will happen when they prove Obama wasn’t born in the USA, and that he funneled taxpayer money to help build mosques in Malaysia. it could further damage his chances at re-election.
Posted by: noflyzone2 | March 2, 2012, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Any women who would ever support a republican candidate would really have to have her head examined. Republicans, if they were allowed, would strip every last freedom for women and outlaw contraception all together so even a married women would have no say over how many kids she had, i’m sure voting and owning property right would be stripped as well. Republicans are neanderthals. Seriously. LISTEN TO WHAT THEY SAY!!!!!! You’re soft as a grape if you support the right wing. They are the Taliban.
Posted by: Sally the sassy | March 2, 2012, 9:18 am 9:18 am
“I wonder what will happen when they prove Obama wasn’t born in the USA, and that he funneled taxpayer money to help build mosques in Malaysia. it could further damage his chances at re-election.”
POSTED BY:NOFLYZONE2
I’d still vote for him, but that’s just how I am.
Posted by: emerald sparks | March 2, 2012, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Limbaugh could use some Midol.
Posted by: Christine | March 2, 2012, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Why is no one upset that medical insurance covers the ‘little blue pill’?????? Why do you not care that you pay for unmarried people to have sex everyday!!!!!! ????? Doesn’t that bother you???? Isn’t that degrading the morals of this country??? aren’t you outraged that you pay for someone else’s sex????? oh no??????…oh, I see, that’s because the persona having the sex is the man. And the women who he’s having sex with???? Oh, she can be thrown in the gutter. But HE, well, HE is so important we PAY for his member to rise to the occassion.
wow. republicans are scum. women hating scum.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Why do people think birth control = promiscuity? —–it doesn’t. But…so what if it did. Clearly the little blue pill is only for having sex. only sex. and nobody cares. nobody is having a hissy fit saying that health insurance companies need to stop paying for that. Nobody says check to see only married males are getting it. Nobody calls themselves pimps for paying for men to have sex. Nobody is calling out men who have sex outside marriage sluts. Why only crap on women??????? The hypocracy of this issue is the point. It’s the entire point. It’s DISCRIMINATION.
Posted by: Marsha Marsha | March 2, 2012, 9:25 am 9:25 am
“The campus question is indeed: “Spit or Swallow”.”
POSTED BY: THE FLUKE STOPS HERE
“If one does like men, which I don not, then swallow is the way to go. Less mess and more protein.”
POSTED BY: MARSHA MARSHA
Sounds like sound advice. As long as nobody is labelled a “slut”.
Posted by: cassandra knowles | March 2, 2012, 9:27 am 9:27 am
As much as some are venting about all of this, including me earlier, it is no big deal. Our focus needs to remain on the many difficult issues confronting the gay and lesbian communities, not the slutty behavior of a the privileged few heterosexuals.
Posted by: don | March 2, 2012, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Pay for me to have sex, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. slut
Posted by: Gene | March 2, 2012, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Wow he is a despicable person. How dare he say such vulgar things about a woman! Regardless of what he believes….does he think speaking in this vile way makes him “a good person”. I believe Hell is waiting for him!
Oh and I just decided that I am for sure voting for Obama now!
Posted by: Liz | March 2, 2012, 9:34 am 9:34 am
“Limbaugh could use some Midol.”
POSTED BY: CHRISTINE
And Sandra Fluke could use some actual common sense.
Posted by: hard johnson | March 2, 2012, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Sandra Fluke is an idiot and so is Nancy Pelosi.
Posted by: Anna | March 2, 2012, 9:36 am 9:36 am
hopefully this story will make the evening news. I was surprised it was not covered last night
Posted by: dave baranowski | March 2, 2012, 9:38 am 9:38 am
“Oh and I just decided that I am for sure voting for Obama now!”
POSTED BY: LIZ
Congrats on now becoming a useful idiot. Was it painful?
Posted by: Hubert's Dictum | March 2, 2012, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Ultra conservative people scare me just as ultra liberals. Extremism in any form is bad. I cna’t believe Limbaugh gets paid to run his mouth. He will be the first to complain about someone being on welfare and popping out children and society having to support them but is against health care covering birth control… seems like a hypocrite to me. And just for the record I am not a Democrat.
Posted by: NoSpin1600 | March 2, 2012, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Many people clearly don’t understand insurance. It’s not a handout. You and your employer pay for it. You pay the premiums – in return you get the coverage. Contraception is much less expensive for the insurance company to cover than pregnancy/prenatal care, birthing and care of a new person. This has nothing to do with economics. It’s all about choosing one particular facet of health-care (contraception) that has a link to a behavior (sexual activity) that people think they have the right to judge others on, and using that to cry religious persecution. This has nothing to do with YOU paying for anyone’s sex. It’s about the system, to which we pay into, being allowed to do it’s job, and provide the services paid for, without a bunch of religious pontificating about whether the system should cover this or that.
Posted by: Robin | March 2, 2012, 9:40 am 9:40 am
So the Democratic party is outraged at this, but Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act while a Chicago Senator–which would have protected babies who survived a botched abortion. Obama said no. Interestingly enough though when Obama left they passed this protection in 2005!! What has happened to the Democratic party– especially the women?? Sad…..
Posted by: whathappened08 | March 2, 2012, 9:45 am 9:45 am
As usual, Rush is right.
Just yet another case of conservative destroying progressive.
Sooner or later you’d think people would wake up from the nightmare and realize that progressive is responsibility for so many of our problems today. Yet I have my doubts. As evident by so many that post on this blog that are progressives, it is clear they have their heads so far up their backsides that they have to open their mouths to look forward. So I have my doubts that they will ever wake from their nightmare anytime soon.
Here’s to hope.
Posted by: trish | March 2, 2012, 9:46 am 9:46 am
“Sandra Fluke is an idiot and so is Nancy Pelosi.”
POSTED BY: ANNA
Yes, but not “sluts”, OK?! The first is just moronically “sexually active”, and the second is a zombie.
Posted by: spasms from the left | March 2, 2012, 9:46 am 9:46 am
We wouldn’t even be having this “conversation” if men could be responsible adults and control their sexual urges until they’re prepared to accept the potential consequences. That’s the one sure proof method of birth control men will not even consider while they argue “sex is a choice”: It’s not up to a priest, a boss or any of you to decide whether oral contraceptives are the best method to treat a specific medical condition, to prevent a potentially dangerous pregnancy or simply to provide birth control.
If you know anything about costs, you know insurance costs are lowered by including prescription contraceptive drugs. I, for one, would prefer not to pay the higher dollar and societal costs associated with unplanned and unwanted pregnancies. Again, this becomes a non-issue if and when those busy ranting over this issue realize how childish and selfish they sound as they lap up what this inane windbag, Limbaugh, spews forth. It seems the bygone days of the aptly named male chauvinist pig have returned with all the attendant refusal by men to accept their biological role in conception. Put bluntly, keep it in your pants, men, and the problem is totally solved at no cost to anyone. By the way, what exactly is the male equivalent term for “slut”?
Posted by: Ellen | March 2, 2012, 9:48 am 9:48 am
“Sandra Fluke is an idiot and so is Nancy Pelosi.”
POSTED BY: ANNA
Quite obviously so. Rush is also obviously right if the ant hill of libs is this stirred up. Truth to libs is like a crucifix to a vampire.
Posted by: Jack Knife | March 2, 2012, 9:50 am 9:50 am
“Sandra Fluke is an idiot and so is Nancy Pelosi.”
POSTED BY: ANNA
“Quite obviously so. Rush is also obviously right if the ant hill of libs is this stirred up. Truth to libs is like a crucifix to a vampire.”
POSTED BY: JACK KNIFE
Yep. The airheaded tizzy that some have worked themselves into is much like a spoiled and naughty schoolgirl who has gotten grounded for the weekend.
Posted by: laughs aplenty | March 2, 2012, 9:53 am 9:53 am
“Sandra Fluke is an idiot and so is Nancy Pelosi.”
POSTED BY: ANNA
“Quite obviously so. Rush is also obviously right if the ant hill of libs is this stirred up. Truth to libs is like a crucifix to a vampire.”
POSTED BY: JACK KNIFE
“Yep. The airheaded tizzy that some have worked themselves into is much like a spoiled and naughty schoolgirl who has gotten grounded for the weekend.”
POSTED BY: LAUGHS APLENTY
I would like to know the definition of “slut” — if it is not a single young woman who claims she may have to spend $3000 a year on contraceptives. Reality check time.
Posted by: Cassandra knowles | March 2, 2012, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I would encourage all women to stop watching or listening to any station radio or TV that carries this pervert’s trash show. I know I will. And remember a ditto mark is an empty quote.
Posted by: steve | March 2, 2012, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Just pointing that out, above, but it concerns me not, personally, since I don’t need any contraceptives. Being gay has its advantages.
Posted by: steve | March 2, 2012, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Samm Dickens: Apparently the object of my statements as regards to government interference in individual freedom went over your head. So, I’ll say it in simple terms: Get out of our bedrooms and mind your own business! If individuals wants to allow a church into their private lives, that’s their business and their choice, but when government takes on that role, the choice, and therefore one’s freedom, disappears.
Posted by: john locke | March 2, 2012, 10:01 am 10:01 am
It’s crazy how many republicans jump to try to legitimatize his statements. However he felt about her, it was still derogatory and disrespectful. These types of comments have no place in politics or the public radio waves.
Posted by: travislg | March 2, 2012, 10:03 am 10:03 am
“…this pervert’s trash show…”
POSTED BY: STEVE
Fluke doesn’t have a “show” — she just made asinine comments in front of Congress.
“Just pointing that out, above, but it concerns me not, personally, since I don’t need any contraceptives. Being gay has its advantages.”
POSTED BY: STEVE
Then why bother being so silly?
Posted by: fact checks | March 2, 2012, 10:05 am 10:05 am
If she did sue for defamation, she’d better make sure she’s not a “slut.” An absolute defense to defamation is truth.
Posted by: Bobby Williston | March 2, 2012, 10:06 am 10:06 am
You’re not going to stop people from having sex unless you make the females wear chastity belts and feed saltpeter to the males. It is a basic animal instinct. That said, what is the lesser of the 2 evils? Unprotected sex resulting in unwanted pregnancies, unwanted kids, abortions, etc. Or protected sex, avoiding the “unwanted” items. The bottom line is we are going to pay no matter what the outcome so let’s try to reduce how much we pay. Don’t want to pay for contraception then we shouldn’t be paying for blue pills either. Who knows, maybe the easy availability of the blue pills can lead to increased unwanted pregnancies. (And it’s a question of discrimination – why are we allowing him to have sex, because he can get his blue pills, but not her, because she cannot get contraception?). We all pay for the HC of people without insurance. Every trip made to an ER by an indigent is paid with our taxes.
Posted by: raggmopp | March 2, 2012, 10:07 am 10:07 am
“…this pervert’s trash show…”
POSTED BY: STEVE
Fluke doesn’t have a “show” — she just made asinine comments in front of Congress.
“Just pointing that out, above, but it concerns me not, personally, since I don’t need any contraceptives. Being gay has its advantages.”
POSTED BY: STEVE
“Then why bother being so silly?”
POSTED BY: FACT CHECKS
LOL. Yeah about as sensible as being all ticked off about Rush saying the obvious truth.
Posted by: Jonathan Barrs | March 2, 2012, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Fluke says it is these stories that she wanted to share at the hearing, including one about a friend with polycystic ovarian syndrome whose insurance did not cover the birth control medication that would treat it. Her friend could not keep up with out-of-pocket payments, Fluke said, and ultimately had to have surgery to remove her entire ovary. The friend continues to suffer from complications of the surgery, Fluke said. I don’t understand.
Why are people calling this young lady a slut? I used Birth Control to control an excess bleeding condition and finial had to have my uterine lining burned off I had tumors that were not operable. Without BC my quality of life would have suffered. I think Rush Lin and all these public figures spewing this ridiculous hate against my fellow sisters is evil and they all should be tarred and feathered.
Posted by: Cintea | March 2, 2012, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Where is all the condemnation for the boys having sex with these “promiscious” women! It is not about paying for HER birthcontrol, but THEIR birth control.
Posted by: Jim | March 2, 2012, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Am I the only one that finds this whole thing completely and entirely ridiculous? I don’t like Rush Limbaugh for a number of reasons but has anyone stopped to think of the consequences of a country dependent on birth control? What if the birth rate in the United States suddenly plumetted like it has in European countries(it already has slightly)? There have been many studies done that show that there is a connection between declining birth rates and economic downturns. There is the whole entire other social issue when it comes to “out-of-wedlock” births which causes further strain on tax payers wallets but where is the consequence of having sex as you please with whoever you want other than the buldging warts and puss that is now around 25% of Americans in their lifetime. My main point is that this is a cultural issue, I doubt its something we’re going to be able to change overnight and it may actually get worse but paying for everyone’s birth control is not something I’m willing to do. On a side note I am not against “hormonal modifiers” such as when women require hormonal medication to treat certain ovarian diseases, they are complete and totally different issues and anyone that treats them the same is ignorant. I try to approach this issue from a purely logical approach but being a Christian does bias my opinion, I think god will frown upon a country that willingly gives out birth control for free.
Posted by: i_wont_pay | March 2, 2012, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I’d rather my tax money pay for birth control than oil and gas subsidies to companies that are raping me! Less children SAXES the taxpayers money. While obesity costs MORE money…isn’t gluttony a sin Rush? LOL Rush you are the haters cheerleader. This is why organized religion is doomed, the Catholic Church, its bad to pay for birth control but okay to molest kids institution.
Posted by: Hege1321 | March 2, 2012, 10:23 am 10:23 am
“If she did sue for defamation, she’d better make sure she’s not a “slut.” An absolute defense to defamation is truth.”
POSTED BY: BOBBY WILLISTON
She can’t sue for anything, obviously, unless she wishes to sue her parents for raising her so poorly.
Posted by: jamica | March 2, 2012, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Cheaper for us to pay for her birth control than to pay for her unplanned children when they go on Medicaid.
Posted by: Teresa | March 2, 2012, 10:24 am 10:24 am
“If she did sue for defamation, she’d better make sure she’s not a “slut.” An absolute defense to defamation is truth.”
POSTED BY: BOBBY WILLISTON
“She can’t sue for anything, obviously, unless she wishes to sue her parents for raising her so poorly.”
POSTED BY: JAMICA
And I don’t know, but I’d bet her parents are “proud” of her for making a silly spectacle of herself.
Posted by: risky business | March 2, 2012, 10:25 am 10:25 am
“Cheaper for us to pay for her birth control than to pay for her unplanned children when they go on Medicaid.”
POSTED BY: TERESA
How about we pay for neither, and demand that people become a bit more responsible. Yeah, there’s an idea.
Posted by: epiphany city | March 2, 2012, 10:29 am 10:29 am
She chose to be public figure -defam not likely … Gov’t to pay for this too? Shouldn’t they pay for booze too to help get ‘em in the mood? Booze is way moe expensive then condoms…. we should also pick up hotel tabs or require schools to have conjugal rooms!!!!
Posted by: Smitty | March 2, 2012, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Rush Limbaugh is still a big, fat idiot.
Posted by: Veronika | March 2, 2012, 10:35 am 10:35 am
What do the Democrats have against babies??—Obama said he didn’t want his daughters “punished with a baby”. In 2002 Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act while a Senator in Chicago. Yesterday HHS Secretary Sebilus said that the increased cost of birth control would be offset since their would be less children born!! WOW
Posted by: whathappened08 | March 2, 2012, 10:38 am 10:38 am
HOWDYMO1 – In what way? Because I think Rush is an idiot? I would reverse it and say anyone that thinks Rush makes sense on any topic has the brain capacity of a juvenile.
Posted by: Jim | March 2, 2012, 10:39 am 10:39 am
1. Hormonal birth control is used to treat several women’s reproductive health issues, not just as pregnancy prevention.
2. It’s cheaper than welfare.
3. If it really is about the money and pregnancy prevention, vasectomies are cheap. And reversible 75% of the time. ( Oh, wait. Men taking responsibility for pregnancy prevention? Messing with their junk? Surely I jest!)
Posted by: RobsJenna | March 2, 2012, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I certainly am glad that I got that liberal arts education that turned me into a “commie” because I’m happy to report that I did not read that Ms. Fluke said it cost $3,000 A YEAR. Apparently some of you read it that way. Obviously my good-for-nothing liberal arts education was a better one than you got.
Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | March 2, 2012, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
POSTED BY: WHAT I WANT
“Yes, I want and demand a new sports car, to help improve my sex life, which will surely be covered.”
POSTED BY: FELIX HORNBLOWER
Pot should also be covered. It relaxes me, and is thus good for my health.
Posted by: Joe bong | March 2, 2012, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Why is it that people think someone else should have to pay, either directly or indirectly, for their indiscretions and overly active sex life? I will say what I said yesterday on here….its YOUR responsibilty if you do the deed, darlin. Not mine, nor any other taxpayer.
Posted by: angus | March 2, 2012, 10:51 am 10:51 am
She is not a “slut”. She just has mucho sex with mucho people. It’s the college way.
Posted by: rafael zimmer | March 2, 2012, 10:56 am 10:56 am
LImbaugh is cut from the same cloth as Howard Stern. He’ll do anything or say anything to get attention. The guy is crazy but he’s crazy like a fox. While he’s stirring up trouble with some and getting laughs and sneers from others, he’s making a fortune.
Anyone, left or right who takes Limbaugh seriously is as crazy as he sounds. He’s an entertainer, that’s it. He found a nitch to fill and make a heck of a living at it. If he could have made a better living on the left, that’s where he would be. Just follow the money.
I’m a conservative independent. I don’t pay any attention to people like Limbaugh or trust the main stream media. No person capable if independent thought, would.
Posted by: oonogil | March 2, 2012, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Lets just have the administration and their buddies in the Senate add an amendment that states “no one will be responsible for any personal actions, no matter how warped or depraved, and any resulting medical conditions will be paid for in full by the taxpayers of the United States of America”. I figure that covers just about anything that a person needs..and we can just raise the debt limit AGAIN to cover it…that should keep the Liberals happy!
Posted by: angus | March 2, 2012, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Ms. Fluke.
On the Today Show, your last comment was about others wanting to “restrict the use of contraception” This is so typical of you left liberal loonies! Nobody wants to restrict anything! We just don’t want to be FORCED to pay for it.
I have a deal for you. I’ll pay for YOUR contraception, if you will pay MY house payment, or even my food bill. No, I know you won’t because you only want something for free. I’ll be you are going to school on some type of grant as well.
Here’s an idea. If you can’t afford it, get a better job….or another job. No time to study you say? Well then, quit spending all night like a flippin rabbit out doing every guy who will have you!
You know, I see these bumper stickers every so often, that say “Rush Is Right”…well, I never agreed with that statement more than I do today.
Posted by: Russ | March 2, 2012, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Rush is the last person who should be lecturing anyone on morality.
Posted by: Fred | March 2, 2012, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Why is it that people think someone else should have to pay, either directly or indirectly, for their indiscretions and overly active sex life?———married women. first point. second point – you pay for the little blue pill for men. So you DO pay for unmarried people to have sex…… they’re all men. And never, ever, has the Catholic church said “gee, we dont want to pay for unmarried men to have sex.” they have and they continue to, with no problem at all. This is discrimination. Pure and simple. women bashing. MARRIED WOMEN use contraception. duh. and unmarried men DO have their sex lives paid for by you. How do you spell HYPOCRACY? R _ E _P_U_B_L_I_C_A_N
Posted by: WhyDoRepublicansHateWomenSoMuch | March 2, 2012, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Jim | March 2, 2012, 10:39 am 10:39 am We have a small minded person that is using other peoples names. I agree with you that Rush is an idiot and someone needs to cap off his mouth. As for this fake person I gave him the name of “Heehoo flung dung”. Maybe this will help you distinguish the difference.
Posted by: howdymo1 | March 2, 2012, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“Rush is the last person who should be lecturing anyone on morality.”
POSTED BY: FRED
Obviously, so is Sandra Fluke. She seems well enough off to be the last person demanding a handout also.
Posted by: jake smithers | March 2, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Far from women bashing..its called personal responsibility, something Liberals do not understand.
Posted by: angus | March 2, 2012, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“Rush is the last person who should be lecturing anyone on morality.”
POSTED BY: FRED
“Obviously, so is Sandra Fluke. She seems well enough off to be the last person demanding a handout also.”
POSTED BY: JAKE SMITHERS
Exactly.
Posted by: kaching lareau | March 2, 2012, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Mean, ugly, untruthful, obscene, denigrating of another’s character without knowledge nor inquiry of such character: mild words and compassionate ones, not matched extreme ones for this angry man with pent up and uncontrolled and uncontrollable rage whose mission these past years seems to reflect a gathering of like minds, also angry at a falling out with the world in which they live.
Education, which can bring with it wisdom, would seem to be the only viable response.
Posted by: Jann Uber | March 2, 2012, 11:14 am 11:14 am
While I dont think taxpayers should be paying for this womens birth control – Rush’s comments were vulgar and out of line. Really because she gets birth control he wants to wach how she is using him. Says A LOT about Rush.
Posted by: riley | March 2, 2012, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Just go AWAY RUSH, you are the stupidist man alive
Posted by: Patricia | March 2, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Please rectify and cry for all the mistreated and unwonted ones in the world. The sadness never ends unless we educate ourselves to vague platitudes and nonsequitors of benevolence.
Posted by: JANN UBER | March 2, 2012, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Far from women bashing.— ALL it is women bashing! Look at your candidates! Santorum says women who are raped should see the pregnancies of their violent rapist as a blessing. Then he says contraception is wrong…..ALL contraception. So????? Women, married women, should not have any control over their lives, their bodies, they should not deny their husbands sex, of course,and when they continue to keep getting pregnant, well, just be good little women and pump out those babies year after year until you die and shut up about it. Men, unmarried men, get their little blue pills paid for by health insurance!!! MY premiums, my money, is being used to help unmarried men have sex and has ever since it’s come out. And NOBODY CARED that unmarried men are having sex!!!!! But women, oh my God, unmarried WOMEN having sex????????? throw her into a pit and stone her to death! My Lord, the republicans sound like the Taliban. HOW do you claim it has anything to do with morals, at all, when for YEARS we have been paying for PLENTY of people to have unmarried sex????? ALL those people have been men! Where is the moral outrage???? where is the “keep your pants on” for men? It is 100% women hating. There is REAL slippery slope that Republicans have zoomed down, already, from wanting to outlaw abortion, to outlawing contraception, to…what’s next? Women’s right to vote? owning property? I have never seen such massive women hating wanting to rip control of their own lives away from women and oppress them in this country since BEFORE the 1950s. It’s alarming and if you think I’m the only women who has noticed it, you will find out, come November when you NO WOMEN voting for republicans. They are repulsed, en masse. I promise you that.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 11:24 am 11:24 am
I came up with that super zinger (11:21 AM) in less than half an hour. Just had to concintrate.
Posted by: patricia | March 2, 2012, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Angus, weird fantasy, that! If you added the reality that there aren’t enough jobs for the number of people who need them due to out-sourcing, modernization, overuse of temps and part-time workers (no health care or sick days, etc.) it changes the picture doesn’t it? It isn’t like your story of the ant and grasshopper, because both of them had equal access to food that could be saved for the winter. The picture in the U.S. and much of the world for folks out of work is similar to the game of musical chairs, except there are only enough chairs for 85% of the players. Should the 15% die of starvation or lack of medical attention because the greediest of the 1% set up this broken economy?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 11:29 am 11:29 am
All the folks on this board who think she an idiot, slut, is having way too much sex, are all close minded idiots. You have no idea why she was taking them, my wife takes them because they balance her hormone levels. Even if if this poor girl was having sex 20x a day, she still would only take one pill per day, and unilike what some of the fools on this board think, condoms arent the same thing. The pill should be covered by insurance (oh I dont know, preventative medicine maybe) and to the fool who made the “what, we should cover toothpaste too?”, what a way to connect the dots on that one einstein
Posted by: M | March 2, 2012, 11:29 am 11:29 am
While I dont think taxpayers should be paying for this womens birth control —why not? birth contro, contraception ,is a medical issue, is it not? Hormone therapy? Women use birth control to control endometriosis. Is that not a medical condition? Women who do not have sex use birth control to lessen their periods. Is that not a medical condition? is pain NOT a medical condition? Do you agree that health insurance should pay for the little blue pill???? A very expensive prescription that has ONE reason and one reason only – to allow the person to have sex. Why haven’t we had this entire discussion on the blue pill years ago??? why no moral outrage that my premiums pay for unmarried peopl e to have sex? To give the prescription ONLY to married men if it’s ‘moral’ and why in God’s name is giving contraception to married women immoral????? WHY do republicans hate women so much??? this is women hating. Women bashing. picking on women ONLY about their possible POSSIBLE sex lives while not caring ONE BIT that we have been paying for unmarried men’s sex lives for YEARS!!!! Why do we pay for invitro fertilization???? why??? You KNOW mosts of those embryos get thrown out! not only is that paying for interfering in what God made happen, an infertile couple, it results in abortions of embryos.???
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 11:33 am 11:33 am
ELECTION 2012 TRACKING-Gallup
Feb 25-29, 2012 – GOP ballot support updates daily at 1 p.m. ET; reflects one-day change. General election trial heats update periodically.
TRIAL HEAT
Romney 50%
Obama 46%
TRIAL HEAT
Obama 49%
Santorum 48%
Posted by: Dennis | March 2, 2012, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Are Republicans so out of touch that they forget what it’s like to be young and sexually active? Or do they honestly still think that having sex before marriage is a “sin” and makes you a slut? Hell, even sex within marriage still requires contraception. My wife used the pill. I guess she’s a slut. Maybe you’re like Rick Santorum and only have sex for procreation purposes. This whole thing is a laugh. And honestly, I could sit and listen to someone that made the argument that taxpayer money shouldn’t go towards birth control. It’s an argument I disagree with (for several reasons), but I at least logically understand it. But no, it has to go directly to hate speak and vitriol from people like Rush Limbaugh and his crowd of mindless followers. And these are the people that claim to be the moral majority! Please. I’ll never stand behind such two-faced bigots.
Posted by: Scott | March 2, 2012, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Amen, Russ
Posted by: angus | March 2, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am
, and so are many millions of other women.—a women voting for the republican party is like a US solider voting to put the Taliban back in power. You are soft as a grape. And no, you will see, record numbers of women will NOT be voting for republicans! I am making logical questions here – why is the little blue pill covered for unmarried men? Why no moral outrage to not help unmarried men have sex? why is invitro fertilization, that results in abortion of fetuses, covered? Why is married women having sex immoral? LOGIC. Follow the bread crumbs, sister, and leads to one place and one place only ..women hating.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I am appalled at the comments here. I have a master’s degree, am in a loving committed marriage and I use birth control. I am a slut???? What if I was in that same committed marriage and lost my insurance coverage? Am I not allowed to have relations with my husband? Isn’t birth control cheaper than the government having to provide for children that people can’t afford to raise due to their financial circumstances? If they don’t have birth control it can happen. Not all people who use birth control are promiscuous. Let’s not lump all women together in that same category.
Posted by: Melissa Konicek | March 2, 2012, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Why do you give this media starved moron any attention?
Posted by: Jeanne021556 | March 2, 2012, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Leave it to the Head Ditto Head and his followers to completely miss the point of Ms. Flukes testimoney to Congress and equate contraception as being only about her having sex and of course Mr. Bouncey-Bounce wants her to put it all on video for his viewing pleasure. What a sleaze! A large number of women in this country have to take oral contraceptives to regulate thier menstrual cycles and prevent the painful side effects they must go through if they DON’T take the contraceptives. Other women take them in hopes of preventing overian cysts that could lead to they being unable to bear children when they choose to do so or worse, develop overian cancer and possibly die. No, Rush wouldn’t dare take the high road on this issue as his Clear Channel masters expect high ratings and he’ll give them to them, even when he has to get down in the gutter to do so!
Posted by: WesTxEx | March 2, 2012, 11:39 am 11:39 am
@ MELISSA KONICEK
Be appalled all you want. The public shouldn’t have to foot the bill for your birth control. Get it? not complicated.
Posted by: simple stuff | March 2, 2012, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Rush is right. The point is partially morality, it’s also the absurdity of the current medical “mandates.” The analogy is extreme. But $83per month? According to the kidshealth.org website pill cost should be $15-50 per month. So some number was pulled from mid air, or the GTWN crowd needs to buy online. I wonder if sex changes are included as a mandate? What is, or will be, the individual responsible for? Does the dude, get subsidized for buying the happy hour drinks, those GTOWN clubs are a little pricey? Clearly, Snufalufugus, and the media “gotchya” crowd doesn’t really want to discuss the issue, rather just show the juicy TV-bits. ABC’s much better than the others, but clearly this is an effort to drive up “negatives,” and they wonder why “there’s no middle.” –see joe bong, above–
Posted by: Joe | March 2, 2012, 11:42 am 11:42 am
..”.miss the point of Ms. Flukes testimoney…”
POSTED BY: WESTXEX
She had no point, except the one at the top of her head.
Posted by: jericho miners | March 2, 2012, 11:45 am 11:45 am
“Why do you give this media starved moron any attention?”
POSTED BY: JEANNE021556
She appeared before Congress, so it became a story of sorts. But sure, she shouldn’t get any more attention.
Posted by: sandy foresome | March 2, 2012, 11:48 am 11:48 am
It’s $3000 becuase health care costs are so out of whack in this country! Funny how you never hear that mentioned?!
Posted by: Jeff M | March 2, 2012, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Rush the drug addict, morbidly obese man, and terrible golfer is commenting on a very intelligent woman who is upset that her insurance company is charging way too much for a woman’s reproductive care. I guess his ratings are so low he must say something stupid to get them up. It is time we just don’t listen to the ignorant slob anymore. Go back to your buffett and take more prescription drugs and have a heart attack already!!!
Posted by: Michael Laabs | March 2, 2012, 11:58 am 11:58 am
WOW!! I am astounded by the vitriol of the responses against the testimony. Truth is, the cost of birth control is a very cost effective measure. It would cost the tax payers very little money, and prevents MUCH more expensive costs down stream. I feel like this “debate” has taken us back 100 years – plus the lack of any civility saddens me. Why must it be so nasty and personal? That doesn’t resolve anything and simply turns us against one another.
Posted by: Curt Hill | March 2, 2012, 11:59 am 11:59 am
If Rush can use health insurance to satify his drug addiction, then this woman should have her right to satisfy her medical need. Whether it is for sex or not is not the point.
Posted by: todaymessage | March 2, 2012, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Why is Limbaugh mentioning the tax payers? They’re not in this equation. She’s got health insurance, and she wants her health insurance to cover hormonal birth control. Not condoms you silly dittoheads, hormonal birth control.
It would cost 3k over three years regardless of how much sex she is having.
Posted by: Jay | March 2, 2012, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
A slut is as a slut does. Hence, Rush is right again.
Posted by: maybelline | March 2, 2012, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
I get it now. I should pay for her sex life. Sounds reasonable. NOT.
Posted by: just wow | March 2, 2012, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Rush Limbaugh is nothing but a fat, big mouth blowhard. He’s a coward who hides behind a radio microphone, who hides behind a radio station. He’s a coward because he does not have the guts or the backbone to say any of this in public because he knows that if he does he will get his fat ass handed to him. I don’t bother listening to Limbaugh because I know that the only thing that he spews is lies and things to cause controversy so that he’ll get his name and his face in the newspapers. The best thing that could happen would be for Limbaugh to lose his radio show so that no one has to put up with this blowhard spewing lies day, after day, after day, after day.
I’m not saying that this whole contraception issue is a right or moral thing to do, but I’m not going to go on a national radio show and humiliate a woman who has her own opinion about what should be done. Having one’s own opinion is what made this country great. Not having some big mouth, idiotic, moron who disagrees with someone’s opinion publicly humiliating you and calling you names simply because he disagrees with it.
Mr. Limbaugh you are going to receive your punishment when you finally leave this Earth and I pity you because I know exactly where you’re going to be headed when you finally leave this place. You are nothing but a vile, disgusting human being who thinks that your own twisted, skewed opinion is the only thing that matters. Well I have news for you, NO ONE cares about your twisted, skewed opinion.
Posted by: TheReaper | March 2, 2012, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Such language is offensive. Politics should not play with ” women’s choice”. Society is better off if government pays for a woman’s choice . It is not a woman’s fault that she only is able to carry children. So if she wants to stop having children, less strain on resources that should be one reason for society to encourage such birth control methods. The problem comes when government dictates if the choice is left to the woman she is better able to choose for herself. None of the men can carry , so leave it up to families to make such choices.
Posted by: j | March 2, 2012, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
How many condoms can you buy for $3,000??
She is a liar, a liberal or a slut. Maybe all three.
Posted by: Nave Dance | March 2, 2012, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I want my condoms paid for President Obama!
Posted by: extreme | March 2, 2012, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Pay for your own health. Pay for your own abortions. Pay for your own religious beliefs. Pay for your own mistakes. Better yet, just pay me to give a flip.
Posted by: D Adams | March 2, 2012, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Birth control pills should be outlawed for the sole fact that they cause cancer, strokes, and other serious life-threatening conditions. Besides, insurance should only be used for life-dependent medicines and procedures; insurance is NOT for helping a person get things they need to continue a chosen lifestyle! It’s amazing how completely backwards many of your logic and reasoning skills are, humans!
Posted by: awake | March 2, 2012, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
I’ve always said the difference between conservative and liberal is more wiring. It’s clear now they’re wired to be sexist pigs as well. Not to mention a good portion of them are unable to even read an article and it’s not three grand per year nor is anybody asking “them” to pay for a darn thing. Keep it up right and the female conservative vote will run left.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 2, 2012, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Listen up: the party line is that Sandra Fluke is not a silly and selfish slut. Next party line: Dogs have flown to Jupiter. Keep up with the memos.
Posted by: party line | March 2, 2012, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Gotta love the “if you don’t pay for my BC, I’ll get knocked up and you’ll pay more” extortion tactics. Is that what passes for “equality” in this day and age?
Posted by: Bender | March 2, 2012, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
wow is right
Posted by: jjc9999 | March 2, 2012, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Sounds just as reasonable as you having to pay for an ER visit for an ear ache. Which more and more people are doing now. They don;t have insurance so they go to ER. And when they can’t pay then you and me pay for it. Would have been cheaper for us if they went to a clinic or a Doc in the Box.
Gosh, I don’t know. Pay for contraception? Or pay for the unplanned pregnancy and resulting birth and all of the other medical bills racked up by mother and child? She can’t get an abortion because there is no fed money available for abortions so it has to be a birth with all of the associated costs for her and child.
How about stop paying for the blue pills for the men? Then we won’t have to spend as much on contraception for the women. What a novel concept!
Tough decision. But either way we will stay pay for the ear ache that required an ER visit.
Posted by: raggmopp | March 2, 2012, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
How does anyone have the audacity to go before a congressional subcommittee and tell them she wants everyone else to pay for her contraception. Some people need to stand up and be accountable for their lifestyle. If she wants to have sex that is her choice no one else. She can either pay for her contraception, have her partner pay for his contraception or they can take their chances. Other choices are to practice abstinence or have less sex so the cost is not to much for her to pay for. No one other than myself or my partner paid for contraception when we chose to have sex nor would I expect them to. Be an adult and be accountable for your actions Ms. Fluke. Study more less sex!
Posted by: Larry | March 2, 2012, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I am glad to see that there are a number of boycotts against LImbaugh’s advertisers. Already one of his advertisers have pulled its ads.
I’m writing e-mails to the remaining ones today!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
The little blue pill is covered by medical insurance!! ONE conservative on here, explain that. justify that! NO test to see if only married men get them. JUSTIFY THAT!
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Rush Limbaugh is an arrogant, disgusting blowhard. He should mind his own business, and at long last, finally shut the effen up!!
Posted by: TruthSpeaker | March 2, 2012, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Ms. Fluke is a lost soul. Rush Limbaugh had a point, but was way out of line in expressing it. We should pray for both of them.
Posted by: Emil Berbakov | March 2, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Why isn’t she on her parents insurance? Isn’t she covered under their policy until she is 26? Why is it the taxpayers responsibility to pay for her contraceptive’s? And where does the feds get the authority to mandate what private companies provide for their employee’s?
Posted by: michaelt | March 2, 2012, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Limbaugh is noxious and obnoxious. But he’s RIGHT. Why are taxpayers paying for this womans lifestyle choices?
Posted by: Gonzalez | March 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“I’ve always said…”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
You say a lot of nonsensical things as you post 24/7. Big deal.
Posted by: post a lot, lonely | March 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
A Fat ugly drug addicted ignorant republican insults an educated smart woman, she should take it as a compliment coming from this nasty many or any other GOP extremists.
Posted by: GOPExtremistshouldDie | March 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Awake, what chosen lifestyle are you referring to? Are you aware that many women need to take birth control pills for medical problems? Are you aware that most married women use birth control for years, even Catholic married women? And do you object to insurance covering men’s little blue pills for their sex lives?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Rush Limbaugh….the obese, 1%’er, the “prescription drug addict” is once again demonstrating his
absolute disregard for anyone he chooses. Hopefully, when Rush labels someone a slut a prostitute
he is looking into mirror so he gets a good view of who is calling the kettle black. Far right Republican
talk show hosts are so self righteous, so pious, so holy in their rhetoric it is amazing they are the
only ones whose sand box is without lumps. This comment about the law student from an obese “drug addict”.
Posted by: mark | March 2, 2012, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
She is not a slut. She’s just plays one in front of congress.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 2, 2012, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Rush may have been a little rough but his message was right on target. This is a ploy by the left wing media to drum up support for so-called womens rights. We may not be able to stop sexual activity outside of marriage we don’t have to pay approve by providing birth control via health care insurance. I feel sorry for her family and hope they do not approve of her sexual activity. There is one word that will prevent this activity and that is NO NO NO NO………………………………………………….NO
Posted by: drcusmc | March 2, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“he little blue pill is covered by medical insurance!! ”
POSTED BY: MARSHA MARSHA
The “hypocracy” of it all!!!! LOL.
Posted by: janine smiksy | March 2, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
“…..The millions of American women who have and will continue to speak out in support of women’s health care and access to contraception prove that we will not be silenced.” – Sandra “Freaky” Fluke
Does anyone actually believe the debate is about support for contraceptives? To all you stupid, leftist gimmick hacks out there (to include ABC, NBC, MSNBC mainstream media outlets), Nobody give a damn about your contraceptive issues. Go get all the contraceptives and have all the sex you want, but leave me and my wallet out of it you thiefs!
“Money, it’s a crime. Share it fairly but don’t take a slice of my pie…” -Pink Floyd
Posted by: Hi | March 2, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Rush – I enjoy most of your controversial dialog. In this case with Ms. Fluke you went overboard.
Fortuately, I guess you, your Insurer and Broadcast company have deep pockets -
you’ll need them I predict.
Posted by: J. Molitor | March 2, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
In last night’s coverage of this story, Brian Williams did not bring up the “slut” remark….did he think that would be labeled as “piling on”? The years Limbaugh, Rove and friends have spent branding the free press as the “liberal media” have made cowards out of reporters. Take a stand and report this as the disgusting affront it is. I found the coverage to be watered down.
Posted by: Alphanunu | March 2, 2012, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
This woman needs to grow up.
If you are having so much sex in college you need to get a job and pay for your own BC.
Who gave you the entitlement of having me pay your way in life??
A girl having sex without being married in my day and Rush’s day was considered a SLUT.
There were the good girls, that men married, and the other kind.
Now some of these girls are not moral or have any SELF-ESTEEM, to pride themselves
“clean”.
Posted by: Mary | March 2, 2012, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
People who want to have sex should of course pay for their own contraceptives; people who want to eat should pay for their own food; people who want to drive should pay for their own cars etc. etc. etc. Having said that, I would pay to have Limbaugh’s mouth taped shut, (which would help him on many levels) because his comments are childish, sexist, and a true obfuscation of the issues. If he cannot stick to his facts, his principles, his arguments without resorting to name-calling, HE’S JUST A BIG FAT IDIOT. I jest. If he can’t deal with this issue without resorting to name-calling, one wonders if he has any justification for his comments–at all. Having said that–we should not be paying for this young woman’s sexual decisions. She should be paying for them. And btw, if she does become pregnant, and does give birth, I don’t think we should have to support her child, either….
Jean M. Davies Schmith etc.
Posted by: Jean Schmith | March 2, 2012, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
@ THEREAPER
Your childish and windy tirade of a book is less than boring. I just hope Rush doesn’t read it and his feelings be hurt. LOL!!!!!
Posted by: reaper nobody | March 2, 2012, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
“@ THEREAPER
Your childish and windy tirade of a book is less than boring. I just hope Rush doesn’t read it and his feelings be hurt. LOL!!!!!”
POSTED BY: LAME REAPER
Yeah, I’m sure Rush cares deeply what these losers think.
Posted by: reaper nobody | March 2, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Here’s the thing that perplexes me. If John McCain had made this statement I can understand people getting upset. He is normally a decent rational person. But for the love of god, this is Rush Limbaugh! This is what he does. He is the Howard Stern of the political world. He says things intentionally to stir up people’s emotions and get them angry. This is his MO. So, why fall for the bait? Giving him attention is what keeps him going and gives his demogoguery traction. Ignore him, pity him, pray for him, but stop thinking that you need to keep getting angry and responding to his blatant attempts for attention.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“She is not a slut. She’s just plays one in front of congress.”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
Like acting, you mean? I didn’t consider that. It’s still part of the big hypocracy.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
How does anyone have the audacity to go before a congressional subcommittee and tell them she wants everyone else to pay for her contraception. Posted by: Larry | March 2, 2012, 12:24 pm.
When did she say that? Answer: she didn’t. She said doctor prescribed birth control pills should be covered under health insurance. She didn’t say she ‘wants everyone else to pay for her contraception.’ She wants it covered exactly like the boner pills are covered. Yeah, how dare her!
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | March 2, 2012, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
“She is not a slut. She’s just plays one in front of congress.”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
“Like acting, you mean? I didn’t consider that. It’s still part of the big hypocracy.”
POSTED BY: MARSHA MARSHA
You goofs are wrong. She was being herself — sadly.
Posted by: sad but true | March 2, 2012, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
If only Nany Pelosi could be fair to men and pay for condoms too. What if a women “accidentally” (wink, wink) forgot to take the pill. men need to protect themselves and condoms are a great way to do this. Is prevents unplanned pregnancies, is great for preventing SDT’s, would be cheap for the government. Any ladies agree with me? If not, why not?
Posted by: Extreme Condom | March 2, 2012, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
“…with gasoline underware on.”
POSTED BY: LIBERAL LISSY
Seriously, the hypocracy of it all.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Everyone knows Limbaugh’s an idiot, and everyone knows that the pill will cost three grand whether you have any sex or not, so all the “so much sex” crap is just that, crap. But I must ask: Where was ABC News when Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a c-nt?
Posted by: Cowcharge | March 2, 2012, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
OMG!!! This is just so totally unbelievable! I can’t believe that this person believes we as taxpayers should literally pay for her ability to have sex. Put aside religious beliefs, what about common sense, logic, ethics, morals??? Here is an idea why don’t you worry a little more about your studies and a little less about your sex life. Pathetic MORON! People like her just lower the intelligence of the entire nation.
Posted by: CJH | March 2, 2012, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
It is interesting to not that the insurance companies are not complaining about giving women a co-pay or in the case of workers in religious owned businesses who object to that, separately giving the women free birth control pills. Because it is so much cheaper than the insurance companies covering pregnancy after pregnancy.
Bottom line, Rush is a liar. Read the article and then compare what the young lady actually said and how Rush lied about it.
I’m glad there is a boycott of his advertisers. He has gone way too far in lying about this young woman and denigrating her character.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Rush can be an idiot at times, but this time he’s pretty much tellin it like it is.
There is such a thing as using “Common Sense” Ms Fluke. Need to use your head, this is a touchy subject, you dont go making statements without thinking of the consequences of those statements. You have to think of how the “Other side” is going to react to what you say. You should have saw this coming the second it entered your head ! Its called “Thinking ahead”, not reacting the second it pops into your head.
Posted by: Mr. Nelson | March 2, 2012, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I guess what Rush is trying to say is if you play you pay. He didn’t ask anyone else to pay for his pills, did he?
Posted by: Linda | March 2, 2012, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Rush is a scoffer, a hater, a pompous arrogant windbag who attained national audience dissing then president GW Bush. He can maintain his (lack of) style only by wandering increasingly fanatical.
Posted by: wordy | March 2, 2012, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
I can’t believe that this person believes we as taxpayers should literally pay for her ability to have sex. Put aside religious beliefs, what about common sense, logic, ethics, morals? Posted by: CJH | March 2, 2012, 12:44 pm.
Where does she say that? Please point out the quote where she says she wants the taxpayers to pay for her to have sex. I can’t find that anywhere. What I CAN find is that she believes that a prescribed medication should be covered under HER insurance just like all the other prescribes medications under her insurance plan.
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | March 2, 2012, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
What ever happened to waiting till your married? If you want to conduct yourself in a manner that would require you to need a condom then its your business but if it’s your business then you can pay for it. I guess next you will want us to buy your cigerettes for when your done with the condom. SAD!
Posted by: Ron | March 2, 2012, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
why doesnt she just go to Planned parenthood and pick up her pills? after all, they provide essential services …oh, PP doesnt do this work for free? then why the heck should i be paying for her pills? will she be paying for my coffee ? or a sandwich?
annd she’s smart enough to be in law school, but can’t get cheap birth control? we all did stupid things when we were young, but we actually used our brains and didnt expect others to do the heavy thinking for us…..she’s an idiot,…however, Rush should try and moderate his speech, since he’s over the line and too agressive with this line .
bottom line, i dont care what you do, just dont expect me to pay, because IF I’M EXPECTED TO PAY, THEM I EXPECT A SAY….
Posted by: john | March 2, 2012, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
It would seem to me, that ms. fluke can choose whether or not she has sex but I won’t be able to choose whether or not I pay for her contraceptives.
Posted by: wally_weaver | March 2, 2012, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
CJH, read the article more carefully. This is not about tax payer money (Rush lied) It is about insurance coverage. Prescription drugs, like birth control are very expensive if you don’t have insurance coverage. Just as men take the little blue pill for their sex lives, with insurance coverage, women frequently need birth control pills for family planning as well as a whole host of medical issues.
Read the article carefully and notice how much Limbaugh lied about what the young woman said, beside all the baseless derogatory attacks on her character.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Right on Rush!!! What else would you call someone who wants to be paid for having sex.
Posted by: David Sagal | March 2, 2012, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Wally Weaver, do you object to your insurance premiums paying for those little blue pills many men use for their sex lives?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
It is sad how many people are reducing this complex issue down to a simple “How dare this woman make us pay for her to have sex!” Says a lot about your character. Or lack of one.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Maybe she’s not a slut, but she’s definitely an a’hole!! Why they hell should we have to pay for contraception, not matter what the reason she might need it. Besides they didnt make as big deal when they trashed Sarah Palin or her daughter, oh I forgot they are republicans and it’s allowed when degrade republican women!! F U you a’hole liberals!
Posted by: yukon | March 2, 2012, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Either way, I am still disgusted with the GOP, and even more disgusted with myself for some psycho-sexual reasons that I won’t reveal again, since I was teased last time told.
Posted by: DISGUSTED WITH GOP | March 2, 2012, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Limbaugh is an iditot. Whether one has sex 1000 times a month or once a month, the cost of the birth control is the same. His statements make no sense at all. How can someone who professes to be so smart be so incredibly dumb. And some of the comments here show people are willing to repeat his comments no matter how riduculous they are – following blindly.
Posted by: Joy | March 2, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Just keep on telling the truth, Rush, and disregard the laughably defensive and hysterical haters. And that’s exactly what he’ll do.
Posted by: before all | March 2, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
It is sad how many people are reducing this complex issue down to a simple “How dare this woman make us pay for her to have sex!” Says a lot about your character. Or lack of one.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
*********************************************************************************************************************
Especially considering it has absolutely nothing to do with them paying for a dang thing to begin with. Just more anti hate the women garbage they seem to thrive on over there lately.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 2, 2012, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
We have become a society of hate and fear mongering. The majority of the posts on this issue are mean and spiteful. Unfortunately the people who are making these statements have either 1) not read the article and researched the aforementioned issue or 2) are so full of hatred and rage that they would base their entire opinion on the words of person who has make his mark in the world by being controversial and mean. Sandra Fluke is in no way asking tax payers to pay for her contraception, she is asking that the health insurance that is provided by her attending Georgetown and paying tuition covers basic needs such as the pill. Outside of birth control the pill also has other medical benefits for women. And though the cost of $3000 over a three year period may be inflated, someone earlier had posted “She can just go to Target and get it for $9 a month” Not sure as to what they are referring to but unless you got insurance covering the rest of it and $9 is your co pay you are way off base. My comments will not change the way people think or act out I am just making an observation. And if you want to label me a left wing nut job or bleeding heart liberal then so be it. But I will give you some background on who I am. I am a 60% disabled vet who has served 23 years in the military with 5 combat tours. I am a father and a husband and have no affiliation with any political party. I am well read and well educated and do not allow anyone else to make up my mind for me. Just sayin…..
Posted by: Sean | March 2, 2012, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Ok, so the pill costs about $50 per month x 12 months = $600 per year, this girl stated it costs $3000 per year! Thats misleading, also if you are so concerned about contraception your partner (male) can get free condoms at the health department or the schools student health department (FREE) i dont know of any schools in California that dont hand them out to every student over the age of 16 for free so this whole things is a set up by the media and the dems.
Posted by: Did that | March 2, 2012, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
She’s a third year law student asking for free stuff at the point of a gun so she can get laid
What did she expect?
Toughen up, buttercup
If you can’t defend yourself with words, you can’t defend clients
Posted by: James OBrien | March 2, 2012, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Actually, “Dan”, if guys like you could keep their pants zipped, women woudn’t have to worry about contraception, now would they? The last time I checked, it takes two to tango … and throughout time, men have always had the upper “hand” in this debate in that they aren’t the ones getting pregnant, carrying a child for 9 months, and being the primary care-giver for 18 years. I propose that instead of Limbaugh providing aspirin for the female students at Georgetown, that he pay for all the child support caused by the promiscuous activities of the male students there.
Posted by: Wiley in CA | March 2, 2012, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
If she acts like a slut, she’s a slut.
Posted by: Robert Haavisto | March 2, 2012, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
We may not be able to stop sexual activity outside of marriage we don’t have to pay — WE DO!!! WHY DO WE PAY FOR MEN’S LITTLE BLUE PILLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE PAY FOR UNMARRIED MEN TO HAVE SEX ALL THE TIME AND HAVE EVER SINCE THE DRUG CAME OUT!!!!!! NOBODY CARED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This is Sexism.! This is women-hating! Period! Over and out! Women use birth control as hormone therapy for many many more things than preventing pregnancy. Contraception for MARRIED WOMEN is not covered either YET we DO cover single men to have sex. So WHY the outrage over covering birth control pills yet not the blue pill??? WHY??? ONE CONSERVATIVE ANSWER WHY YOU DO NOT MIND PAYING FOR UNMARRIED MEN TO SINFUL SEX BUT YOU DO MIND PAYING FOR MARRIED WOMEN TO PREVENT PREGNANCY????? –dont worry. I know you can’t. Your position is undefendable beyond “Well, I just hate women”
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Well stated Sean! Thanks for you service.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Anyone who listens to Limbaugh should be completely embarrassed with themselves. What an immoral, worthless human being.
Posted by: jag | March 2, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I can’t believe that this person believes we as taxpayers should literally pay for her ability to have sex. Put aside religious beliefs, what about common sense, logic, ethics, morals? A lot of people in this day and age expect to have everything paid for by the Government!
Posted by: Frank | March 2, 2012, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
If most of those commenting here had half a brain they still would not be able to tell the time of day. Good god you are a bunch of ignorant uneducated moronic inbreeds there are some that actually understand whats going on but the others have zero education outside of what they get from dumb asses like Rush and Beck. All I can say is good luck to you you will need it as you don’t have the intelligence to survive all by yourselves if this is what is now left of the republican party then the party should roll it up and quit trying to show how dumb a human can really be.
Posted by: Doc Holiday | March 2, 2012, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
“How dare this woman make us pay for her to have sex!” Says a lot about your character. Or lack of one.————- WHY do you NOT mind paying for unmarried men to have sex??? why were you never outraged that medical insurance pays for the little blue pill regardless if the man is married or not? Why do you pay for, and not mind, men to be sluts, yet you call a women who you dont even know if she is using contraception for sex, or endometriosis, every name in the book and hate on her. Says alot about your character. or lack of.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
lexingtonlady, I agree. This is fabricated outrage which talk radio excels at. Never heard anyone have a problem with this issue until the seed was planted and people were given the command to become angry. It is a shame too because this is such a complex issue which affects millions of people (and not just women). It would be nice if people were interested in the truth as opposed to the “truth according to what fits their beliefs”.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
The only right these young students have is to say “YES” or “NO” if she says yes to him, then she and the boy are taking responsibility for their actions. In case these kids don’t know how babies are made they should have a class on this in high school and every university. Also have a class on the cost of raising a child. My kids and my grand kids are coming up learning to respect their bodies and have morals. Folks this is the only body you will get in this life. If you abuse it there is hell to pay as you get older. Take a look around and see the effects of different life styles and the results of the deeds they have done in their life time. The prisons are full of folks that disobeyed the laws and did it their way. The hospitals are full of folks that have abused their bodies or done things that put their physical bodies in danger. The street corners are full of girls and pimps that did what this student wants our permission to do and pay for her right to do it. There are thousand of other examples.
P.S. Universities are for higher learning and to prepare you youg’uns for the future not to be the next victim or the next producer of some new virus you are important to your parents, to all your friends and mostly to yourself. We have enough dead babies and enough single moms living in misery. We don’t need another prostitute walking our streets and getting beat up or killed.
Posted by: Ed Rodriguez | March 2, 2012, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
It would seem to me, that ms. fluke can choose whether or not she has sex but I won’t be able to choose whether or not I pay for her contraceptives.
Posted by: wally_weaver | March 2, 2012, 12:55 pm.
Do you pay her insurance premiums? If not, then this has nothing to do with you paying for anything she does. How freakin’ stupid ARE you people?
Posted by: Disgusted with gop | March 2, 2012, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Except she never said that Frank. You guys are so easily played it’s absurd.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 2, 2012, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I can’t believe that this person believes we as taxpayers should literally pay for her ability to have sex. Put aside religious beliefs, what about common sense,——— ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!! Hey, want some logic??? (1) how do you know she’s using contraception for preventing pregnancy? How do you know? She could be using it as hormone therapy to lessen the intensity of periods, to help regulate her cycle, to prevent endometriosis. So how do YOU know her medical condition she is taking it for??? (2) why do you NOT have outrage over covering men’s ability to have sex??? Why? You do. Your health insurance premiums are higher for covering the little blue pill for men. So why do you not rant about that? why do you think covering men to have unmarried sex is ok, yet covering women relief from pain, or endometriosis, or regulating their menstrual cycle???? why do you hate women so much?
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“Limbaugh is an iditot.”
POSTED BY: JOY
Your post says it all. “iditot”, lol. Ah, the “hypocracy” of it all.
Posted by: jill james | March 2, 2012, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I’m a female and Rush is right! If you discuss personal issues that should be kept personal, you open yourself up to ridicule! If someone needs contraception, it should be up to that person to take care of it. The taxpayers should not pay the bills. Who cares how much it costs because it is a personal choice. What morons! She is a slut!!!! If this was my daughter, I would be so embarrassed! Obviously, the left has no problem with the lack of morals and values this girl has. That is telling of the party!
Posted by: J | March 2, 2012, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
She’s a third year law student asking — allow me—asking the women be TREATED EQUAL!!!!!!!! Do we cover men’s problems in their nuts? yes. Do we cover men’s ability to have sex regardlessif they are married or not. We do. So…then do the same for women. Period.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Why do you hate common sense so much? ———— COMMON SENSE — Treat men and women equal. Please explain to me how covering the blue pill for unmarried men and NOT covering women’s contraception qualifies for common sense?
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I suppose the senior voters in this country would be appalled to find out ObamaCare is promoting taxpayers pay for college students’ sexual habits. How many are going to vote Democratic in this next election when seniors’ Social Security and Medicare are being cut to provide birth control for college kids?
Posted by: David | March 2, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
LMFAO! Rush is playing these knee jerk reactionaries like a harp from Hell. The media is like Bluegills in a farm pond, jump at anything that falls into the water.
“Demonstrating absurdity by being absurd.” They just don’t get it!
Posted by: Jeff | March 2, 2012, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
The fat bald adulterer drug addict who forced his maid buy him drugs for his habit speaks. What a phony.
Posted by: Samiam | March 2, 2012, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Frank, this isn’t about taxpayers at all, LImbaugh is lying. This is about insurance coverage for birth control pills, which some women need for medical conditions. It is no different from insurance covering the little blue pill for men. Except birth control pills for women are taken once a day, every day, not matter how little or much sex they have. Limbaugh lied about that too.
Without insurance coverage, the $1000 a year prescription cost is too high for many students and poor married women. If men get their little blue pills at a reduced price through insurance coverage, why shouldn’t women be able to get birth control pills with their insurance discount?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
I have a cat! I have a right to have a cat!! I demand that the taxpayers pay for my cat’s food and medical bills!! It is my fundamental rightr to have a cat! Freedom of expression!! I express my love for my cat!! I have a right to love my pet!! Whether I am married or not, it is my right to not get pregnant!! The taxpayer must pay for my desire to not get pregnant!! Now, I have some land in Idaho I want to see you……..
Posted by: Pat | March 2, 2012, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Russ Limbaugh is a big fat, slobbery, bigoted, racist IDIOT! If enough people would
boycott his sponsor this fool would not make such incendiary and divisive comment. Since he has been married four times I guess he has never used contraceptives. Yeah right. It is none of anyone business if someone uses contraceptives and you foolish people are not paying for it so mind you own doggone business and stay out of everyone’s else.
Posted by: Fred Grier | March 2, 2012, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Whenever someone Rush Limbaugh criticizes anyone, I figure they must be doing something right.
Fine, if tax payers don’t want to play for birth control, at least pass laws that allow for paid maternity leave. When a woman leaves her job to go on maternity leave or to take care of her infant, it does affect her ability to retire with the same benefits as her male counterparts. If she doesn’t leave her job to do this, she is called a “bad mother.” If she uses birth control and tries to plan her life responsibly, she is called a “slut.” Damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t, as a woman.
If the shoe were on the other foot, and Mr. Limbaugh and his so called conservative cabal were capable of getting pregnant and yet retained their tradition paternalistic power, all forms of birth control would be subsidized for them and lauded by religious institutions.
I hope Mr. Limbaugh continues to make himself as ridiculous and as misogynistic as the authority figures who conducted witch hunts. No doubt if our society still burned women at the stake, he’d be bringing his marshmallows.
Posted by: Toni | March 2, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
not wanting to pay for someone else’s sex choices — you do. YOu pay for men to have sex. You only mind paying for women to have sex. (2) this includes married women. contraception for married women. You do NOT mind paying for unmarried men to have sex, yet you DO mind to paying for married women to be able to avoid pregnancy from sex with their husbands. again, I point out, this is an defensible position. Why do you hate women so much???? dont worry. You’ll pay for it. Hope you like the sound of President Obama for the next 4+ years. This is just golden, you couldn’t pay for this type of negative advertisement against conservatives, once again, you took the rope and you’re swinging from the rafters from it and you’re too dunce to even know it. classic. good bye.
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
“Just keep on telling the truth, Rush, and disregard the laughably defensive and hysterical haters. And that’s exactly what he’ll do.”
POSTED BY: BEFORE ALL
When the dust settles and these gooftards tire themselves out with broken-record posting, this is the bottom line. He’ll laugh, and keep on telling the truth.
Posted by: hard johnson | March 2, 2012, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Excuse me! Where was all this outrage over the disgusting comments and humor by Bill Maher made towards conservative women. The media and liberals had no problem excusing that idiot for his malicious diatribe. While I don’t condone what Limbaugh said let’s hold everyone to the same standard shall we?
Posted by: MNIndependent | March 2, 2012, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Rush is against gays also, and as a real teabagging gay man, I really don’t like him. He gives us fat people a bad name.
Posted by: FRED GRIER | March 2, 2012, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
I’m a conservative moderate. I have no time to hang around in here today, way too much work to do, but here’s my one post—- This turns me off, way off, to Romney. Whom up to today, I’ve favored for president. I heard him back track on this….uhhh…..I’m married. I have sex with my wife. I dont appreciate this or the attack on this law student. this does not bode well for the republican party. Olympia Snow is retiring because of the poison that is partisan politics today. Perhaps a message to the republican needs to be sent. This turns me off, way off, to anything republican.
Posted by: Not UR Average Joe | March 2, 2012, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Jeff, yeah he is sure playing them. His advertisers are cancelling and the Dems are raising big bucks on this story of old guy insulting young woman student by calling her a slut. Yep, he is really playing them.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I’m still waiting for the part where Rush actually said something WRONG.
Posted by: Steven Lemon | March 2, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Hmm an AM radio guy makes some comments about a law student at Georgetown wanting everyone else to foot the bill for her lifestyle, and the hissy fit begins. LOL!!! Kudos to Limbaugh
Posted by: cogs | March 2, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
POSTED BY: WHAT I WANT
“Yes, I want and demand a new sports car, to help improve my sex life, which will surely be covered.”
POSTED BY: FELIX HORNBLOWER
“Pot should also be covered. It relaxes me, and is thus good for my health.”
POSTED BY: JOE BONG
Very funny, but also very true.
Posted by: inconvenient reality | March 2, 2012, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Sean, thank you for your service.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
She absolutely is a slut if she is telling the truth. What happened to morality? Why sould we pay for her activities. Rush nailed it and you can’t seem to handle it. Then the gutless president called her to see if she’s okay… well, she seems to be doing fine… what about the rest of the country?
Posted by: R. Yorke | March 2, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Please stop lying, NOT UR AVERAGE JOE, you are a partisan lib to the max who posts from the left constantly. Stop bs-ing so badly.
Posted by: old man truth | March 2, 2012, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
The gross old pigs have just become porkchops.
Posted by: WW | March 2, 2012, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
If it is to be a CHOICE to have sex, then it is a CHOICE to use protection and the kind of your CHOICE, whether male or female ! therefore it is a CHOICE you freely make and not tax payers, insurances, churches or anyone elses respondsiblity. stop trying to get publicity, radio host or law student. get a grip.bottom line is…take respondsibility for your own CHOICES!!!!!
Posted by: yardnome | March 2, 2012, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
“Please stop lying, NOT UR AVERAGE JOE, you are a partisan lib to the max who posts from the left constantly. Stop bs-ing so badly.”
POSTED BY: OLD MAN TRUTH
I wonder who he thinks he’s fooling. OLD MAN TRUTH, you are correct.
Posted by: jasmine knight | March 2, 2012, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
That Fluke gal and the Dem’s media must think that American people are idiots. So Ms. Fluke can afford to pay $40,000 – $60,000 per year to attend Georgetown college, but she can’t afford condoms – and – it’s up to the taxpayers to foot the bill to satisfy her sexual appetite? What about her boyfriend(s) is he so cheap that he cam’t bring his own condoms?
This has got to be the dumbest effort yet that the Dems are trying to con the voters with.
Posted by: Maxine | March 2, 2012, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Well, if she is not a slut what exactly is your definition of a ‘slut’? Incredible that someone would document the intimate details of their sex life before the world. Incredible that someone surrounded by free clinics would complain about the cost of contraception. Do you think that 50 years ago this person would only be referred to as a ‘slut’? I could think of some other choice words that would have been applicable and agreed to by most people around at that time.
Posted by: Perplexed | March 2, 2012, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I shouldn ‘t have been made to paid for Limbaugh’s drug rehab.
Posted by: FIZZ | March 2, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Limbaugh is a disgusting blow hard and a misanthropic inhumane unhumanitarian monster. His life must be terribly miserable carrying around all that hate in his racist bigoted world. Self-hatred? that would be my guess.
Posted by: nfission | March 2, 2012, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
“As I walk around my campus I see the faces of those effected by the lack of healthcare” This young woman made herself and every Gorgetown woman look like idiots. One can not compare the true hardships of families going through foreclosures, cancer, lost of jobs to lack of employer or government paid contraceptives!
She may not be a ‘slut’ but she sounded like one. My goodness how are these young women being raised?!?!?!
Posted by: Motherof4 | March 2, 2012, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I’m sure all of this “outrage” is doing wonders for the old boy’s ratings.
Posted by: cogs | March 2, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
“I ask yet again — Am I a slut??? the Hypocracy is HUGE!!!!!!”
Have no idea whether you’re a slut, but you are clearly and stubbornly misguided and histrionic. Stop being a ditzy drama-queen, and maybe someone will one day take you seriously.
Posted by: wise up please | March 2, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Do people realize contraceptive doesn’t mean condom? In this case it means birth control pills. Birth control pills which, for teenage girls per say, are used to prevent ovarian cysts, stop PMS symptoms that can interfere with your life, and/or regulate your period and make the blood flow more manageable for women with heavy periods who risk becoming anemic.
This ignorant bile here just makes me ashamed of my country. Ashamed of the entire human race, if fact.
-A sexually inactive woman who needs birth control so she doesn’t risk her health
Posted by: Shannon | March 2, 2012, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Enough is Enough Rush is a coward. I challenge him to a dual.
Posted by: Roger | March 2, 2012, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
I wonder if Sandra Fluke the young law student ever heard of abstinence. That way she wouldn’t have to use the $3000 earned from her summer job to pay for birth control pills to have recreational sex. As far as her medical concern, she obviously hasn’t heard that unprotected sex spreads Aids. I’m not a Rush fan but for the media to make her out to be some kind of a victim was ridiculous.
Posted by: Z. | March 2, 2012, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
She is not a slut. She just plays one in front of Congress.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 2, 2012, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Ceck out RL bio. Second, all should be more concerned about gop child molestors methinks. Finally, rather than women using aspirn, methinks the rt wingers and RL buddies could use HADAL vice oxicon, Rush
Posted by: Carl | March 2, 2012, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Maxine, no one but Limbaugh is talking about condoms! We are all talking about prescription birth control pills which many women take for family planning as well as for medical issues.
And LImbaugh lied about taxpayers footing the bill. This is about insurance covering the prescription, as without the insurance discount the pills run around $1000 a year.
If men get their little blue pills for sex covered by insurance, why shouldn’t women get coverage on birth control pills?
Read the article again and you will see how much LImbaugh lied about what the young woman testified to.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Rush Limbaugh gets paid $400 million a year because there are tens of millions of uninformed, narrow-minded lame-brains out there in radioland who are too lazy to do some research of their own on the Internet to discover the facts. Limbaugh and fox news do not present the truth, and if you think that they do, you ought to ask yourself WHY. It’s too easy to believe the propaganda that is spread as truth if you do not check. As Ronald Reagan said a number of times: Trust, but Verify. You people are missing the verify part, and you’re stuck believing a lot of nonsense!
Posted by: EPA | March 2, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
“She is not a slut. She just plays one in front of Congress.”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
She plays her part well.
Posted by: jinx it | March 2, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Limbaugh went outrageoulsly over the top in describing Ms. Fluke as a slut or anything similar, and he should apologize to her as publicly as possible……The larger issue is whether or not the federal government, using taxpayer money, should provide anything the public wants simply because the public wants it. Specifically, should all women, udner the guise of women’s health, be entitled to TAXPAYER FUNDED contraceptive measures and/or abortions?…….The GOP says no, the DEMS say yes.
Posted by: munster42 | March 2, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I in no way agree with what Limbaugh has said. However, WOW $3000.00, it kind of makes you wonder what is going on with her, that is A LOT of sex. This is one of those examples that verifies that journalisim has died in this country, this number should be fact checked, if it was she would be outed as a lier. Finally, why should I pay for someone to have recreational sex?
Posted by: Kevin | March 2, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I do believe this young woman’s argument was to have health insurance pay for contraceptives…not the taxpayers. Unless you are paying her health insurance.
How many people making nasty comments toward this young woman have your employer pay for your healthcare insurance? How many have insurance that covers contraceptives? In your mind that means your employer is paying for them…..right?
Posted by: Mary | March 2, 2012, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
No one with any brains, any compassion, or any taste listens to that fat blowhard.
Posted by: Bennett Hammond | March 2, 2012, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
I love the progressive comments… all contain derogatory remarks… but none contain any FACTS as to WHY Americans, through our insurance premiums, should pay for ANYONE ELSE’S SEX!!!! — This is just ONE MORE push by liberals to make the government in control of everything!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
I totally agree with Rush. Fluke can have all of the free birth control she wants. All she has to do is keep her legs closed!
Posted by: Godpoppysgirl | March 2, 2012, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Rush discredits his comments with the SLUT reference. But as to principle, he is right. Why should anyone be required to pay for contraceptives? That is absurd. The next step will be mandatory payment for abortions. So now instead of simply talking about a woman’s right to choose, they are demanding FUNDING for that choice — mandatory funding. Fine. Then that should mean that if I am pro-life — and want a baby — my employer should be required to pay the entire bill for it. In fact, why not require them to support the child?
Posted by: Nathan | March 2, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Perplexed, listen to the young woman’s testimony on video. She did not talk about her sex life at all, she simply told the story of how her friend couldn’t afford the prescription birth control pills that she needs for a medical condition, as her insurance didn’t give her a discount as a covered medication. They run around $1000 a year depending on the type that you are prescribed.
LImbaugh lied about this young woman and what she said, big time.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
To put it bluntly, if this gal wants to be a professional goober receptacle, she can do it on her own dime not other peoples or the tax payers!
Posted by: Tom | March 2, 2012, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
rush you need to lay off the crack pipe
Posted by: steve | March 2, 2012, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
This supplying contraception at tax payer cost is just one more step to government control of our lives. Hospital and doctor costs for baby delivery were not paid for in the sixtys… It was w choice that the individual made Have sex then pay for the pleasure or the consequences yourself. Do not ask me to pay.
Posted by: Frank Hanson | March 2, 2012, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
So many hateful judgemental comments and how many of you are Christians ?
Posted by: J Edward | March 2, 2012, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Kevin, read more carefully. $3000 for 3 years, makes it $1000 a year for birth control pills if you don’t have an insurance discount.
And I can’t believe I have to write this, but birth control pills are taken once a day, every day, no matter how much or little or no sex you have. They take a month to work. Many women have to take them to control medical conditions like excessive bleeding, painful ovarian cysts, etc.
All the guys here who don’t know about these pills is surprising!
And if you equate having insurance coverage for these pills as wrong, do you think men getting their insurance discount on those little blue pills is wrong, too?
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Actually as a woman I’m embarrassed that this chicky that goes to a 20k+ a year law school is begging congress for a handout. That horse and pony show they put on is more predictable than a televangelist making people walk at the end of the show.No doubt my self proclaimed representatives at NOW are screaming feigned outrage at that radio hack instead of the ironically name Ms. Fluke.
Posted by: Brittany | March 2, 2012, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Tom, it is not taxpayer money, it is about insurance coverage for birth control pills. Don’t you read the article before you comment?
Don’t believe anything Rush says without fact checking it, that guy has used a lot of drugs!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
She can figure out how to get $30,000 a year for law school per year but can’t figure out how to get $600 a year for sex ?????
She is obviously a patsy for the Dems trying to creat an election year issue.
This whole thing is a FLUKE
Posted by: Wil | March 2, 2012, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
What a moron. She wants the taxpayer to fork over tax $$ for her sex?? Rush is right, she’s an indirect prostitute. And you libs that are saying the insurance company should pay it?? What do you think we are stupid out here?? Insurance companies jack up the prices on all of us and me to pay for this garbage. Why don’t she just walk down to Planned Parenthood and get all the contraceptives she needs. They hand it out like candy down there. For someone that is going to college, she is just demonstrating how stupid she is. She may have some intelligence but common sense??? Nada.
Posted by: Dennis | March 2, 2012, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Limbaugh is trying to start a big ol ugly mud slinging fight ..One he cant possibly win…So tuck your tail between your old man haunches and go away
Posted by: merelyme | March 2, 2012, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Look up the definition of a PROSTITUTE.
Posted by: Mister A. | March 2, 2012, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
What seems to be missing from the discussion is a balanced look at Georgetown’s policy. That policy is here called into question. Taxpayers DO NOT support Georgetown’s insurance cost – that is the cost that would be expended if they covered contraception for students, as they do for faculty and staff.
And BTW, the so-called “free” birth-control options are the ones which cost taxpayers, and are a bargain compared to the costs of unwanted pregnancies.
Posted by: Steve | March 2, 2012, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
No abortions?? No matter what?? Is that what you believe? Well, if that were the law of the land, my wife and son would be dead. She had an ectopic pregnancy, and a twin embryo was stuck in her fallopian tube. If an abortive procedure had not been performed, the fallopian tube would have ruptured, killing her and the embryo that became my son. There are some circumstances that must be considered. Seeing things in black or white does not always work.
Posted by: TruthSpeaker | March 2, 2012, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:03 pm —- NO!!!!! —– You are wrong!! — This is NOT about coverage for birth control pills… if there is a “medical reason” for taking them beides birth control…. most insurance companies will cover them with a Dr’s note… this is not new!! — What IS NEW.. is WHO PAYS FOR IT!!! —- This law says the insurance companies must offer it free… which means YOU AND I pay for it with increased insurance premiums!! — So I am forced BY LAW… to pay for somebody else’s “romps in the hay”!!! —- THAT is the issue, and you know it!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Rush is absolutely 100% right…why should we pay to have this woman’ leg sin the air?
Posted by: BigLiberal | March 2, 2012, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Liberals have been calling conservatives names forever and no one get’s upset.
If Fluke can not afford condoms she should stop having sex. Poor women have clinics for health and birth control needs. We are subsidizing her education we should not be paying for her out of wedlock fun time.
Posted by: cc | March 2, 2012, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Carney on the Sandra Fluke controversy – “He wanted to express his disappointment that she has been the subject of inappropriate personal attacks,” Carney said. Why is it that personal attacks are only inappropriate when directed at LIBERAL private citizens, but Obama’s campaign manager, Jim Messina, and other Democrats can target the Koch brothers, i.e. CONSERVATIVE private citizens, and there is no mention of hypocrisy? Rush’s language was inappropriate and reprehensible but it doesn’t mean POTUS needs to get on his soapbox and try to say that personal attacks against liberals are out of bounds but attacks against conservatives are ok (if not encouraged)…”The pundits like to slice-and-dice our country into Red States and Blue States…We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.” -Sen. Barack Obama, 2004
Posted by: BG | March 2, 2012, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
I find it sad that everyone is getting so caught up in this debate over birth control & women’s rights (which will not change). It just means that this latest distraction is working. As far as Limbaugh is concerned…he’s a drug-addled, loudmouth idiot, spewing his hatred from his compound here in Palm Beach. But, like all of us he has the right to say what he wants and we all have the right to listen to it or not. I choose not to. After his rant on the air yesterday he also made the local news a second time after a “suspicious” package was delivered to his home. After running it thru his “personal” scanner it was deemed to be nothing dangerous. That he has his own security screening device kinda says it all…he’s an inflammatory personality & knows it. That is what has made him wealthy but he wouldn’t be on the air if people weren’t listening.
Posted by: cwillisfla | March 2, 2012, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
I’m sorry I disagree with insurance companies having to pay for women to be sluts. Pay for there contraceptives? Are you people out of your freaking ass minds? I guess if they can get those paid for then we men can get our Condoms paid for right? Point is if they get insurance companies to start paying for these then the next step will be to get the government ( aka TAX PAYERS ) to pay for them. Sorry but if I have to pay for it then I want something out of it…
Posted by: Gary Strickland | March 2, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Rush you are not allowed to have your own ideas about anything or anyone. Only obama can do that! You should know that by now. People get a life.
Posted by: mike b | March 2, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Shannon2125 | March 2, 2012, 2:07 pm — Obamacare raises healthcare premiums!!!! —– 1) Preventive mandate = higher insurance premiums… 2) Child coverage mandate = higher insurance premiums… 3) Contraception mandate = higher premiums……. Hmmmm…. so eventually the minions of Progressivism will COMPLAIN to… (drum roll please)… the “greedy insurance companies” for raising rates!!! —– Typical progressive theory put into practice…. we need to vote these bums out!!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
This woman’s a fool for wanting taxpayers to pay for $3000 worth of birth control. Seems abit much. And Rush is a totally classless waste of flesh for using the analogies he did. He should be thrown off radio for that kind of thing. He surely is the expert on pills though.
Posted by: Mike | March 2, 2012, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
I dont think Rush has rights to judge anyone. He wasn’t great himself. He is a dope addict, and I am sure he had slept with other women. He should not have called this woman a name. He sounds more like a muslim to me. America, stop listening to this man’s crappy comments. He is not making this country better. He is not GOD. We need Jesus and God back in our country. WE dont need to listen to this idiot. He is making so much money by hurting so many people. Time to put the end to his greedy ways.
Posted by: curly | March 2, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
What is not noted here is that the same hospitals and insurance companies that will not cover birth control for women DO cover prescriptions meds for men with impotency problems- whether due to age, or infirmity. Therefore, women should only have sex if they are to procreate whereas men are encouraged to have sex beyond their body’s capability for recreation. So who are these men to have sex with – according to these hospitals and insurance companies and Rush L., it would be girls too young or too old to conceive or … other men…..
Posted by: Webster1 | March 2, 2012, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Why would one expect anything else from an accepted and well regarded mouthpiece of right wing supporters of ambiguous cultural background? This is America, the bastion of free speech.
Posted by: Biswas | March 2, 2012, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
There is no logical argument to support Ms Fluke’s position. The democrats must rely on pure emotion-based, illogical arguments in order to make their convoluted point. And that’s before we even get into the fact that the federal government is bankrupt even though government agencies are giving out free birth control for the asking.
Posted by: jscottu | March 2, 2012, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
She has set back feminism 20 years. I was responsible for my own food, clothing education and contraception when I was in college. Why doesn’t she roll in her 3000 to her student loans and pay it back. After all she can afford the expensive law school! Women should stand up for their rights to pay for their stuff and stop asking for hand outs. What a horrible role model for women. I’m more insulted that the left thinks that women are idiots and buy this BS for more government power grabs than anything out of Rush’s mouth. Clearly the Democrats lack a sense of humor!
Posted by: Lisa | March 2, 2012, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
The loyal opposition, I guess that you are against your insurance covering those little blue pills for men, too?
I bet that you won’t respond!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Steve | March 2, 2012, 2:09 pm —- You said “the so-called “free” birth-control options… are a bargain compared to the costs of unwanted pregnancies.” —- That kind of logic would make us all slaves to the government! — If they have the power to mandate anything they want because it is “economically justified” on some number-cruncher’s balance sheet… we might as well become China… goodbye liberties!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Wow, this country is clearly not educated on what the birth control pill does for a woman’s health. My ex-wife had to take the pill in order to keep from bleeding to death every month. The young woman who testified to congress was talking about a similar situation. I can’t believe the number of people on this site saying horrible things about women – absolutely disgusting, you should all be ashamed. Is this how you were raised and taught to treat people? And on the topic of coverage, the argument is not about making government pay for anything, it’s about making employers and insurance companies play by the rules. You can’t push your religious beliefs on your employees, the mandate actually supports religious freedom. Eleven states already have similar laws – as several people have already pointed out, this whole mess is simply about opposing anything the Obama Administration does. Pathetic.
Posted by: Tom | March 2, 2012, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
If it prevents another lawyer/community organizer/politician from being concieved, I’ll offer to pay for permanent sterilization for this Fluke.
Posted by: Sean | March 2, 2012, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
I can’t believe in 2012 we are having a contentious conversation about birth control. I also can’t believe in 2012 there are so many people who equate a woman on birth control as a slut.Very telling.
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Mike, this young woman is not wanting taxpayers to pay for her birth control. That is just a lie Rush said.
What the young woman was talking about was her friend not having her insurance cover her birth control pill prescription which she has to take for medical reasons. (many women are on them for problems such as excessive bleeding, ovarian cysts, etc.) Her friend can’t afford the $1000 a year that the prescription costs without her insurance covering it.
Rush lied about a lot, read the article!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
When does this girl have time to go to class? $3000 a year for contraception means she is in bed most of the time she’s supposed to be in school. Silly me, I always thought Georgetown was a university. Now we find it’s a brothel.
Posted by: hotgun | March 2, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
The sad thing is that the number of people who vote, out number the people who work. Let’s pay for birth control, food, rent, health care, transportation… Why exactly am I working?
Let’s all have the same things and make the same amount of money; what’s that called again?
Posted by: Michael S. | March 2, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
I’ve always thought Rush was an idiot… but, wow, this is above and beyond his usual lunacy. There is a real issue to be discussed here, but making comments that make Ms. Fluke look like a sex queen isn’t contributing to the discussion. It’s just reinforcing what we already know… that there is a disconnect between Rush’s brain and his mouth. Think before you speak, man! Unbelievable.
Posted by: C2002 | March 2, 2012, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Great job Rush.What these nitwits don’t understand is that it’s about FREEDOM from a muslim “president” who wants to tell Americans who does what and who pays for it.
Posted by: Zman | March 2, 2012, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Others have been fired for less. Why not this “man” who uses the language of a confirmed gutter snipe. Sadly the silence of his sponsors and peers will be tantamount to a thunderous aplause
Posted by: Douglas Sinclair | March 2, 2012, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
If controceptive is too expensive, she can choose to abstain or choose other cheaper methods of birth control. This is another example of people feeling they are entitled to something and that the government should pay for it! RICIDULOUS!!!
Posted by: Susan | March 2, 2012, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Cheryl, you will be happy to know there is an active boycott of advertisers on Limbaugh’s show. Already one advertiser has withdrawn. Women and men who respect women should not put up with the insane attack Limbaugh launched on Sandra Fluke, a college student.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
If you need hormone pills for legitimate medical conditions, insurance will pay for it. If you want the pill so you can have sex without worrying about pregnancy, you’re going to have to pay for it yourself. That’s all a part of personal responsibility. Women like Sandra are really nothing more than immature children who believe everyone else on the planet has a legal and moral responsibility to fulfill their every want and desire.
Grow up Sandra.
Posted by: Sarah | March 2, 2012, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
If its OK for people to “opt out” of paying for health insurance that covers birth control, can I “opt out” of subsidizing health care for large families that don’t practice birth control?
Posted by: Robert | March 2, 2012, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Webster1 | March 2, 2012, 2:17 pm —- There is a lot of disinformation here about a “covered Rx” and a “paid for by the insurance company Rx” —- If you can’t see the difference, do some more homework!! —- Most group health insurance plans “cover” birth control pills for ANY reason (medical alternative reason or birth control)….. what is in question is should YOU AND I pay (through our health insurance premiums), for “FREE” birth control (because the insurance company is forced to provide it for free) for anyone else!! — Do you see the difference?!?!?!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
For those saying “contraceptives can be used to treat aliments that effect women”–This is true. However, they’re NOT cures for those aliments. And last time I checked, the primary purpose of contraceptives is to prevent pregnancy. And normally, women get pregnant from having sex, do they not? So doesn’t that mean that the vast majority of women use contraceptives to avoid getting pregnant as opposed to treating menstrual cycles and ovarian cysts?
For those saying “contraceptives are too expensive”–That only depends upon what you are using, as there are a wide variety of birth control options out there that are easily affordable and accessible (the cheapest being the “oh so hard to practice” abstinence). The reason why folks bring up condoms as a form of contraceptive is not because it’s the same as the birth control pill, but because they are ridiculously cheap and widely available. After all, if 98% of all American women use birth control, doesn’t that automatically mean birth control is widely available and affordable WITHOUT relying on the federal government to subsidize it?
For those saying “taxpayers are not going to be paying for contraceptives, the insurance companies will”– How do you folks think the insurance companies are going to get the money to cover the costs of providing free coverage for contraceptives? The most likely answer? Raising the premiums on everybody’s insurance rates.
For those saying “this is not a religious freedom issue, this is a woman’s rights issue”–Isn’t the foundation of all woman’s rights the ability to take care of themselves and their own lives INDEPENDENTLY and WITHOUT the government interference? What Sandra Fluke is essentially saying “I and my fellow women are unable to take care of ourselves when it comes to our sex lives and health concerns. Please help us, federal government.” Wouldn’t that actually be undermining the independence of women? Also, last time I checked, the 1st Amendment still reads, in part, “Congress shall make NO LAW respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.”
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“When does this girl have time to go to class? $3000 a year for contraception means she is in bed most of the time she’s supposed to be in school.”
Hotgun, explain your logic please. How do you arrive at that conclusion? Do you understand what birth control is and how it is used? By your comments, I would have to say you do not.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
One more time, for those who can’t be bothered to read the article, the facts:
This is not about making taxpayers pay for birth control, Limbaugh lied.
This is not about condoms, LImbaugh lied.
This is not paying people to have sex, Limbaugh lied.
This is about having insurance include birth control pills as a covered prescription, so their cost isn’t a $1000 a year!
Men have insurance give them a discount on their little blue pills, so fair is fair! And that isn’t about health, just about sex!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
I am sure this young lady is not a Slut, but she should pay for her on Birth control. I don’t think she is entitled to that’
WP Azbill
Posted by: William P Azbill | March 2, 2012, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Can someone point to me the place in the bill it says taxpayers will be paying for employer provided healthcare relative to the contraception provision? I thought my employer covered our healthcare; including an employee contribution.
If they do allow employers to break out birth control for their religious beliefs, then I’m going to join the anti-smoking and anti-obesity religion. Those two lifestyles cost our healthcare system far more than birth control.
Posted by: Confused | March 2, 2012, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Confused, :)
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
One of the more brilliant liberal posters had the timerity to bring up the idea that she has to use pills because she (or her partner) can’t use condoms due to a latex allergy. DUH!!!! Then use non latex ones. There are many brands of them out there too.
And the idea that someone can afford $60,000 a year for law school tuition but can’t pay $1000 ( a grossly distort figure ) for contraception boggles the mind.
And if she is so intelligent that she can get into a prestigious law school after graduating from a university, Possibly even with a degree that has some value to it (although that is doubtful considering where her mind is) , I bet she can get a position that would pay her much more than $3000 over the summer. A total, absolute loser.
Posted by: Larry | March 2, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Obama, cnn, president, msnbc, liberal, politics, Michelle, wealth, California, Washington, dc, 420, hippie, dispenser, jok Obama, cnn, president, msnbc, liberal, politics, Michelle, wealth, California, Washington, dc, 420, hippie, dispenser, jok
Posted by: josh | March 2, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:25 pm —– 1st case = medical need….. 2nd case = simply having sex…. and in BOTH cases with this law… the question is… WHO PAYS FOR IT!!! —- My insurance premiums will go up for BOTH prescriptions IF the government is forcing insurance companies to pay for it….. so I am being forced to pay for somebody else’s “romp in the hay”!!!! — Thsi is preposterous, and you are twisting the root problem!!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Rush – you’ve CLEARLY expressed your point of view as guaranteed in our Bill of Rights freedom of Speech. Granted. And with each Freedom comes a Responsibility – I hope you, producers, & insurers have enough to pay for the Freedom you’ve spoken in public
Posted by: J. Molitor | March 2, 2012, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Why are we bothering with the sex problems of a woman who claims her sexually activity during the course of her college life will cost 3000 dollars, at 50 cents a comdom, that is 6000 sexual events during her college career—–that is 5.47 times a day, including the days off from school—-a ridiculous conversation anyway—-Liberals trying to distort the facts, this country is in trouble and they chose to ignore it and bring up this dribble
Posted by: Pete / Indiana | March 2, 2012, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Over $3,000.00 a year? What? Gold plated pills? Government studies range from $20-50 for a months supply. $50 (high end) x 12 months = $600. An implant like an IUD costs less than $1,000 and lasts several years. Then there are barrier methods of spermicides, diaphrams, caps, contraceptive sponges, and female condoms utilized on a per use basis. Then there are hormonal methods such as the weekly “patch” and twiced a month vaginal ring. And there are monthly injectable methods or every twelve weeks Depo-Provera.
1st) Pills, hormonal, orals and implants do not protect you from transmitted disease. How irresponsible of her.
2nd) She and every woman should carry condoms. Tell the guy, no condom, no sex. Condoms cost on average about $1.25 a piece for the good quality ones. Lets assume a high use rate of 5 times a week (sex 260 times a year, wow!!). That equates to $1.25 x 5 per week x 52 weeks = $325.00 a year. A far, far cry from the $3,000+ stated by Ms. Fluke. Now, if the woman gets at least a free meal in the deal from the date first, say $10.00 for the meal, she is in the black by $8.75. Even if the guy only buys her one beer at $3.50, she is still in the black by $2.25. So why does she need “free” birth control? Hell, she’s making money for her “entertainment”. Now I can start to see where the crass Limbaugh comment came from.
3rd) Some women are not very consistent in taking birth control pills daily. So much for its effectiveness. Some women will not take them because of concerned health risks. Others just won’t take them.
Posted by: KenM | March 2, 2012, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Did Rush mention he is a drug addict? Addicted to prescription drugs? She didn’t say anything that he has turned this into….he got what he wanted controversy and the center of attention.
Posted by: Trea | March 2, 2012, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Genius! Everybody knows men are unhappy with all the sex they are having, but we can’t stop because all these sluts keep demanding it from us. If we take away their pills maybe they will leave us guys alone and we can stop having all that unwanted sex.
Posted by: Gussley | March 2, 2012, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Thank God for Rush Limbaugh! Tell it like it is, Rush!!!! A woman (or a man for that matter) wants to use contraception? Fine, pay for it. The problem that is strangling this country is that everyone in America wants to look to everyone else to pay their freight. Contraception is not a health issue. It is a wise thing to employ to protect a person from pregnancy and disease during a VOLUNTARY activity. Rollerblading is a voluntary activity also. Should all Americans have their tax dollars spent to provide free wrist guards???
Posted by: Scott | March 2, 2012, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Pity him. Rush was born without a brain.
Posted by: Kate | March 2, 2012, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
MJ McNulty, your right to exercise your religious freedom ends when it interfers with anothers rights, in this case the right to medicine. If insurance companies offer coverage for birth control pills for women and little blue pills for men to everyone, then religions running a business do not have the right to tell the insurance company to not cover certain medicines.
Religion isn’t a free pass to mess with others lives, just to freely chose your religion or none at all. If you believe it is a free pass then you must be okay with Sharia law coming to the U.S.!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
How can anyone give any credence to anything this drug addicted fool has to say. The boy doesn’t have any credentials (I understand that he did at least get his diploma from high school). He’s just like Glen Beck jumping on any issue and making a mountain out of a mole hill. If Rush could just see his fat face (looks like a baby that needs to fart) and realize just how obscene he looks attacking this young lady he would realize just how STUPID he looks
Posted by: John Ammerman | March 2, 2012, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Rush is right (of course) it is insane for a college student to demand that someone else pay for her contraceptives. And if her contraceptives cost $1000/year, she’s paying too much! And frankly, if she can afford Georgetown’s tuition, she can afford to pay for her own contraceptives. She is an embarrassment to all women.
And calling her a prostitute fits – she wants someone to pay for her to have sex.
Posted by: Loony Lib | March 2, 2012, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Let’s change the conversation here to the truth. This whole contraceptive thing was concocted by Obama and Georgy biy Steffeneffolous because Obabble was losing the womans vote. The same type of “reporting” Georbels did in the 1930′s.
Posted by: Zman | March 2, 2012, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Confused said: “Can someone point to me the place in the bill it says taxpayers will be paying for employer provided healthcare relative to the contraception provision? I thought my employer covered our healthcare; including an employee contribution.”
The provision states that insurance companies are required by law to pay for contraceptive services and provide them free of charge. Which means, in order to provide this service for free, the insurance companies have to earn the money in order to pay for the contraceptives themselves. Guess how insurance companies normally cover the costs for a reduced or free service? They raise your insurance rates. Therefore you, as a taxpayer, are going to have to pay MORE for your health coverage in order to provide free access to contraceptives and birth control.
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
While Rush’s comment wasn’t as artful as it could have been, it has magnified the Country’s #1 problem: we’ve become a Nation of slaves to the US Congress and Federal Government, for we all belong to some group, some clique seeking to suck on the teet that is really the American taxpayer. If we can’t put our mouth on our preferred teet, then we cry like a one-week old hungry baby.
Here we have a Georgetown Law Student, for heaven’s sake, wanting the dole, but she is no different from the GE CEO and his lobbyists sucking on even bigger teets, with a much higher flowrate of tax dollars to GE shareholders in the form of tax breaks. What happened to those strong feminists that schooled us in English in jr high and high school 30-40 years ago? They would never have debased themselves to depend on “the man.”
But the reality today is that this young woman is no different from the Defense Industry and their distributed and egregiously expensive and inefficient manufacturing base to produce weapons wanted by Congress and local constituents but not the DoD itself. She is no different from the hundreds of thousands of bankers and realtors and builders seeking to preserve their precious tax write-off for mortgage interest. She is no different than the tens of thousands of tax attorneys and accountants seeking to preserve our incomprehensible tax system. She is no different from bloated and unaccountable churches, synagogues, and mosques that are completely political but through the IRS’s only blind eye they remain tax-free havens. She is no different from the worst of the lot, the elderly that put in 40 cents and expects $3.50, along with a couple of free knees and a hip or two and don’t you dare make them have to pay even a $5 copay for the good presecriptions.
The reality is she is just like you and me and your neighbors. She has a pet rock like you do and she is just banging her drum hoping she gets her piece of the pie from President Obama and/or the US Congress/Senate. You may not like her pet rock, but from the Taxpayer’s POV, it is just like your pet rock. It represents yet another subcommunity that wants to live off one of the American taxpayers’ teets. The US Government, regardless of party, is only too happy to trip over one another to make sure she can “get some.”
Stu D. Lyman
Posted by: Stu D. Lyman | March 2, 2012, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Since when do tax payers pay for my insurance? Last time I checked, there is no line item on my check stub that says “other tax payers portion”. People should know the facts before the comment on the issue. Birth Control is hormone therapy which is used for more than preventing births.
Posted by: Kitty | March 2, 2012, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
One point: Neither Obama or the Catholic Church is paying for the contraception (and OTHER preventive care) coverage mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care law. The POLICY HOLDER is, through their premiums.
The Constitution grants the federal government the authority to regulate interstate commerce (which the health insurance industry is a part of) and the federal government (Congress) has passed legislation requiring all health insurance companies to cover preventive care (vaccines, mammograms and other similar tests, and CONTRACEPTION, which by definition, IS preventive) at no co-pay.
The Church does not have the right to ignore secular law re’ such things as employment discrimination, minimum wage and overtime, patient rights/privacy in their hospitals, OR what insurance companies are required to cover. No more than they have the right to practice human sacrifice or polygamy or child abuse or slavery citing religious grounds.
Another point: Rush Limbaugh is a big, fat (and sexist, racist, drug-addicted, lying) idiot. He makes his fortune making inflammatory statements and stirring up division and hatred among the ignorant masses. There is nothing worthy of respect in him.
Posted by: RAVEN | March 2, 2012, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
“Now, if the woman gets at least a free meal in the deal from the date first, say $10.00 for the meal, she is in the black by $8.75. Even if the guy only buys her one beer at $3.50, she is still in the black by $2.25. So why does she need “free” birth control? Hell, she’s making money for her “entertainment”. Now I can start to see where the crass Limbaugh comment came from.” These comments say so much about you KENM. And none of it is good.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
I would love to see the percentage of married women who use birth control. I would guess it’s actually higher than the percentage of unmarried women who use it. Not to mention that birth control has many medical uses that make a normal life possible for many women.
This is nothing more than a hateful attack on a woman for daring to speak. I guess Rush thinks he can silence her and others who will speak by throwing around words like slut and prostitute. It is sad that women in the U.S. still have to face these issues in 2012!
Posted by: Really?! | March 2, 2012, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Right one Lexiforyourcomments on 3-01-12, 12:53pm! Unortuantely it only takes A big mouth instead of a big mind to have a radio talk show. Controvery creates advertising bucks, so Rush has mastered that. He has also mastered the ability to see the speck in others’ eyes while looking past the logs in hiw own.
Posted by: James | March 2, 2012, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
While Rush’s comment wasn’t as artful as it could have been, it has magnified the Country’s #1 problem: we’ve become a Nation of slaves to the US Congress and Federal Government. Well played my friend.
Posted by: Zman | March 2, 2012, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Some of the comments here from the right are just … pathetic. If there is a word for “ignorant-squared”, then it would apply here.
Please learn to listen to someone other than Rush, so that you might have even a clue of what you’re talking about. (No question that 95% of these comments are from men.)
OBVIOUSLY you didn’t listen to the witness’ testimony. OBVIOUSLY you know only of Rush’s (mis)-characterization of her statements. Geez, do any of you even KNOW a doctor? Take even a high school biology course?
Do any of you know a woman? One that you like? Geez, the sheer stupidity of some of these comments is overwhelming. Truly, truly pathetic.
Posted by: George Kaplan | March 2, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
No Stu, I think the number 1 problem is the number of people who spend hours listening to talk radio addicted to being angry about whatever is the trendy subject at the moment. Government’s too big, contraceptives, health care, etc. These demagogues plant a seed in people’s mind and even though a few weeks ago no one discussed or thought about contraceptives (other than the women taking them) now there are millions of people hysterical about contraceptives. What I wonder is the next “let’s be enraged” topic. Anyone want to make a guess?
Posted by: e | March 2, 2012, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Leave it to a Idiot Like Rush, how can any one stand to listen to this creature he is the evil person who is not happy with life in himself.
Posted by: skip | March 2, 2012, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
What some churches do today is far removed from the teachings of great moral individuals like Abraham, Jesus, Mohammed, Gandhi, Switzer or King. Rather, they preach intolerance, scorn for those who believe differently than they do and rigid adherence to church power rather than to individual conscience. They preach hatred for their enemies, holiness of money and acceptance of racism. How often have you heard that Mormons are not Christians, that Jews are infidels, that Muslims are out to kill everyone or that the other religion is false and one’s God is better than the other person’s God.
Posted by: Luigi Andrea | March 2, 2012, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
At what point in her testimony did Ms Fluke discuss her personal sexuality? When did she talk about how she needs someone to support her sexual habit? There is no statement indicating that she has ever had sex. Women take BC pills for more than just avoiding pregnancy; they provide support for many health issues that have little to do with pregnancy. She was right on when she pointed out that the type of diatribe RL vomited is aimed at silencing women.
RL is a fat, drug-addled, pompous a$$ who has made a fortune working against America in favor of his own bottom line.
Posted by: noly972 | March 2, 2012, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
I TOTALLY AND COMPLETELY AGREE WITH RUSH!!!!!
According to his argument, I suppose women are tired of being unpaid prostitutes!
Women need to demand from their male sex partners to foot the bill for their birth control and abortion; after all, they are half responsible for the behavior.
Posted by: GIRL Lopez | March 2, 2012, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
What’s wrong, ABC? No information on what a year’s worth of birth control actually costs? No costs for a year’s worth of condoms? No annual cost for any other type of contraceptive? Or, can it be that Fluke’s idea of contraception is actually abortion? Two or three a year, I’m sure, is not out of the realm of possibility for someone so inane and puerile as Ms. Fluke – or any liberal for that matter!
Posted by: jawin | March 2, 2012, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
This is what happens when someone tells the truth. What would YOU call a girl who is having so much sex and having to spend so much money on birth control that it is impacting her finances? Come on, look at the big picture – she chose a Catholic university knowing the Catholic church’s stand on birth control, can afford $45,000/yr for school but can’t afford $5/ month for birth control pills or a pack of condoms, is an admitted “reproductive rights” activist (whatever that is), and “sees these women walking around on campus and can tell from their faces that they are disturbed about their right to birth control” (how does she know from looking at them?). Let’s call her what she is – a community organizer and trouble maker. Suck it up lady. Put your panties back on and hit the books, not the bed.
Posted by: Suzyq | March 2, 2012, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
$41,500 to attend Harvard Law School. does not include other expences. If this gal can afford $41,500 to go to school she can pay for her own pills, if not her wealthy family should help her out. I would like $3,000 worth of Viarga per year for free. I don;t think men should be covered for same. Not a health issue. If she went to a cheaper school she wouldn;t have to worry about the cost. P.
S. I drive a 15 year old truck, and I would like the government make someone pay for it because I’m making payments on my $29,500 5th wheel and I can’t afford a new truck. Gotta love this country. Catholics who don;t agree with church on the issue of premarital sex, birth control etc. The door is not locked and you can find another abode. Church does not have to change one darn thing, just because the public at large wants to change it. So Cath women use birth contro methods, as well as Cath men, big deal they are not CATHOLICS but catholics and in name only. P.S. Do women recall when boys and men wanted to buy a pkg of condums? You had to ask for them. Duh! How do you think boys and men feel when a young girl is working behind the counter? Even if it was a grandmother same thing. Yes, to hell with the church until you want to get married, and when you get the “you have 3 mo. left to live”, and when you have a funeral you want the church to be there for you.
Posted by: John | March 2, 2012, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
@Librarian53–But then you get into the slippery slope in that, even though the federal government would be providing a right for women to have affordable access to contraceptive health care, it then opens the door for the federal governemt to be able to mandate by force of law how a religious organization must practice their own religion, even if doing so violates of their own beliefs. That essentially means that the State now controls the Church, which would be a violation of the seperation of church and state.
There is also established legal precedence here. Recently, the Justice Department argued before the Supreme Court that the federal government has to right to tell a church or religous organization who they can hire or fire based on equal employment. The Supreme Court in a UNANIMOUS 9-0 decision REJECTED the DOJ argument on the basis that it would be in violation of the religious rights protected in the First Admendment.
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
The overall issue should not be if this young lady is a “slut” or not, but why people seem to think it is more responsible to use birthcontrol than to stop having sex. Sex is a natural thing and a very stronge urge dont get me wrong but anger is also a strong urge and I’m not out killing people who make me mad. People need to stop trying to take the easy way out and take responsability for there own urges. Sex needs to between a husband and wife while being open to the idea of children.
Posted by: Madaxe77 | March 2, 2012, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
How many burgers and red meat does Limbaugh eat every day to be the size he is, and for all those heart health problems he is afflicted with? Other premium payers in the Insurance that covers his health care should have him booted out from coverage for his eating habits, in all likelihood, are costing them for what he sucks out of the premium pool in his own care. He can keep whatever videos that may exist of him gorging, and the pills he popped to get high to then need care, to himself.
Posted by: aru | March 2, 2012, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I am SO disgusted with all the IGNORANCE and hate so many people on here have displayed! No woman deserves to be called a slut! I saw the meeting where Fluke spoke. She NEVER once said that she was haviing “so much sex” that she couldn’t afford the birth control. That’s just a misstatement! Furthermore, I’d like to explain a few things to all you Rush fans (and to Rush Limbaugh himself).
1. NOT ALL WOMEN TAKING BIRTH CONTROL PILLS ARE HAVING SEX. Birth control is useful for a lot of things aside from not making babies. Women use these pills to regulate their period, stop the creation of cysts (these are little water balls that tend to form in the uterus/breasts/ovaries. They can become cancerous, but even if they don’t, they’re VERY painful to live with when they pop), the pills help with endometriosis, lowering breast, uterus, and ovarian cancer risks. These are just some examples. There are other reasons why women take it, and it’s very much a life-saving tool that is available.
2. Even if women are taking it for birth control, it’s much cheaper to pay a low-income woman birth control pills (fyi, you take ONLY 1 A DAY, regardless of sexual activity) than to pay an abortion or labor and cost of living of her child. By the way, the cost of raising a child now is about $250,000 over 18 years. That’s way more than $1000 a year for a pack of pills each month. (1000/12=$83.33<—the cost of the pack per month)
3. LESS WOMEN WILL BE AT RISK OF GETTING CANCER! What this means for the taxpayer? $AVING$! It's less money that we'll have to pay for chemotherapy, surgeries, home-bound care, etc. especially if the woman in question is on Medicare or Medicaid (or both).
To those of you who are skeptical about what I'm talking about, please, please, PLEASE educate yourselves on the topic. Ask a professional, your OB-GYN, your doctor, go online, do research. YOUR LOCAL CHURCH (unfortunately) IS LYING TO YOU! Talk to the women around you who take the pill. You'll find that many aren't taking it for the sex they're (not even) having. I speak from experience. A close friend of mine and I both suffer from cysts, it's the most horrible pain that exists on planet Earth. If it weren't for the pill, I would have to take off 7 days EVERY MONTH of the YEAR because of the pain. That's 84 days in which I don't make money that I need to pay my bills and such. Granted, we don't need taxpayer funds to pay for our medication, because my medication's parent company has a program that assists women with the cost. My insurance also offers coverage for the medication, so it's not a problem. But I feel bad that there aren't other women out there whose insurance can cover their pills, especially if they suffer from something as bad as endometriosis and cyst formation. But regardless, people, we've got to be frank about some things. We are right now paying for a lot of people and their babies they can't even afford to take care of. These people are sucking the system for everything it has. It's getting to a point where it's just not sustainable. We're STILL going to have to pay for either this or the pill. I choose the pill, no matter what. It's definitely the cheapest option in all cases, medically necessary or not. It will offer a breather to the taxpayer in all senses!
Posted by: Nathalie | March 2, 2012, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Who cares what Limbaugh says. He is just making money by stirring up the people that want things to “stay the same”. We might as well go live in Iran for all these backward thinking people who want to “keep women in there place”. Better yet why don’t you go live there and the rest of us sane, forward thinking people will remain in the US.
Posted by: Di | March 2, 2012, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
She was trying to testify about her friend who needed contraception for her cysts. Rush Limbaugh should be ashamed of himself.
Posted by: da_decider | March 2, 2012, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Hell, If she needs money for Birth Control I’d be more than happy to provide her with the funds.
How much does she charge per hour??
Posted by: Rick | March 2, 2012, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
This woman obviously thinks everyone else should pay for her lack of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, let alone the evident lack of morality. If she is studying to be a lawyer she should know she is setting up a huge discrimination suit. She can’t get pregnant without male sperm. Therefore IT IS NOT A WOMAN ONLY ISSUE!
Posted by: James | March 2, 2012, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
NATHALIE—The latest studies I looked at says the birth control pill increases the chances of cancer. Did Media Matters post new ones?
Posted by: donna | March 2, 2012, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“The fact that this slut”… cite your reference Jennifer.
..”her lack of PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, let alone the evident lack of morality.” cite your reference James.
Back up your statements. It is easy to reduce someone down to a deragatory label (little kids are capable of doing that) and to question their morals but cite your reference for arriving at these conclusions.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 2:34 pm —- Read my 2:32 post—- YOU still don’t get it!!!!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 2, 2012, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Have to give it to Rush to get so many talking about this issue, love him or hate him he does get people thinking … He is the master of Illustrating Absurdity By Being Absurd! Thank God for Rush, he is a beacon of Responsibility and Reason in this strange new world we live in.
Posted by: CLW | March 2, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
The woman said it can cost up to $3000 a year. And no, that is not out of the norm for prescription birth control pills + doctor exam which is required for prescriptions.
Posted by: jim | March 2, 2012, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
During the 1970′s and 1980′s the female gender demanded equal rights and independence from the male dominated culture. Frankly, I am stunned by Fluke’s contemporary mindset as compared to the fierce independent mindset of the 1970′s and 1980′s. I just don’t believe today’s female gender wants to be dependent upon the government for personal choices. What’s changed this independent mindset? Very disturbing trend.
Posted by: John | March 2, 2012, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Maureen states: “DOES EVERYONE INTHE WORLD NEED TO KNOW SHE IS HAVING SEX?” How do you know she is having sex? Please cite reference. This is getting tiring.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
This is getting tiring.
POSTED BY: TY—Feel free to go play with yourself or knit a sweater…..
Posted by: donna | March 2, 2012, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
That’s what I figured. No reference to cite. But unfortunately I doubt it will stop you from needlessly bashing someone’s reputation with deragatory name calling. I sincerly hope you never find yourself on the receiving end of conduct such as the one you are exhibiting. I hope you will at least think about treating people with more respect.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Thanks all the same Donna, but I’ll continue to act like an adult.
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
another non story created by a political hack(you know who) working for a has been “news”network to throw red meat at the knuckle dragging drones still lame brained enough to believe them.PATHETIC!!
Posted by: n landry | March 2, 2012, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
TY said Waaaahh!!!!!….waaaaaahhhh!!!
Posted by: donna | March 2, 2012, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Guys, guys, she’s NOT a slut, she’s just PROMISCUOUS… there’s a difference, but I don’t know what that is….
Posted by: Pancho | March 2, 2012, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Conservative Logic: We don’t want you taking birth control so you have to have this baby, that you cant afford. Now that you have had this baby that you couldn’t afford we don’t want to give you any financial help. oh your a single mom that cant work because you have to take care of your kids and you cant afford a babysitter because you don’t have a job because you had to watch your kids well seems like your in a little bind. Sorry not our problem.
Posted by: gord | March 2, 2012, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
…Dunno much about this piece of legislation, but is having sex a personal choice? If it is, then who should pay for your contraceptive? If it is not, then I guess we should all fork out the dough and pay for those poor souls who have no choice and are being violated sexually, against their will I might add… right? ;-)
Posted by: Sergio | March 2, 2012, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Where is the loud calling for Bill Maher, (and half of the democrat congress) to apologize to Sara Palin, where was the outrage by the left when she was being accused of being everything except a decent American patriot??
Posted by: vance smith | March 2, 2012, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
The more Rush Limbaugh talks, the better it is for Democrats. More than half the population in the US is female and they vote. He is doing the Democrats a great service and is helping to guarantee the reelection of President Obama.
Posted by: Emily C. | March 2, 2012, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
@Nathalie–But the most common reason for why contraceptives are used and prescribed is for pregnancy prevention, correct?
According to the study published by Guttmacher Institute, it states that 58% of all women rely on contraceptives, IN PART, for other purposes other than pregnancy prevention, meaning the remaining 42% use it exclusively for pregnancy prevention. Now you might conclude that this means that less women use contraceptives exclusively for pregnancy prevention–however, that 58% includes women who are using contraceptives for pregnancy prevention IN ADDITION to using them for aliments such as menstrual pain, menstrual regulation, acne, endometriosis, etc. A closer look at the study shows that the actual number for those using contraceptives EXCLUSIVELY for non-contraceptive purposes is 14%. That means the remaining women surveyed who are using them for contraceptive purposes–which again includes the 58% who use for BOTH contraceptive and non-contraceptive reasons–is 86%
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 2, 2012, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Emily, you may have hit on the reason for this. It really is in his best interest to keep a Democrat in the White House. Hmm….
Posted by: ty | March 2, 2012, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Yep, Rush is great. Give him another talk show and more time on TV. He is doing a fantastic job of convincing any undecided women they should vote Democrat. Thank you Rush! November headline: “Obama wins by a landslide” (and invites Rush to the inauguration to thank him).
Posted by: Emily C. | March 2, 2012, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Rush probably can’t get it up anymore. Sour Grapes, pershance, Rushie-boy?!?
Posted by: James Jasion | March 2, 2012, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Rush is a freak. Why is he still employed?
Posted by: virginia | March 2, 2012, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
I would encourage everyone to read the letter from Grorgetown’s president in response to all this.
Posted by: Confused | March 2, 2012, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Men won’t take responsibility when they cause a pregnancy, so women want contraceptives, and they are called sluts. Takes two to make another unwanted baby.
Posted by: Bob Green | March 2, 2012, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Congrats to Rush for being right again. All the whining and venom from dreary drips actually shows just how right he was.
Posted by: congrats | March 2, 2012, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“The more Rush Limbaugh talks, the better it is for Democrats. ”
POSTED BY: EMILY C.
Right. LOL. Definitely the more Obama jabbers on and blows hot air, the better it is for Republicans.
Posted by: wanda mensen | March 2, 2012, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
MJ Mcnulty, I read your 3:31 comment. There is no slippery slope. You said, ” it then opens the door for the federal governemt to be able to mandate by force of law how a religious organization must practice their own religion, even if doing so violates of their own beliefs. ”
The government has always had the power to limit religious practices if they violate our laws, such as those who want to be married to more than one person or forbidding sharia law. Religious freedom has never meant the freedom to do whatever you want or people would just go around making up their own religions!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
No babies for me, since I’m gay, but that’s besides the point.
Posted by: BOB GREEN | March 2, 2012, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
POSTED BY: WHAT I WANT
“Yes, I want and demand a new sports car, to help improve my sex life, which will surely be covered.”
POSTED BY: FELIX HORNBLOWER
“Pot should also be covered. It relaxes me, and is thus good for my health.”
POSTED BY: JOE BONG
“Very funny, but also very true.”
POSTED BY: INCONVENIENT REALITY
Too bad there’s so many lengthy and mostly worthless posts in between the good ones.
Posted by: mad maxine | March 2, 2012, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Raven, you obviously didn’t listen to Ms. Flukes testimony. Limbaugh lied about it.
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
The hypocracy of it all gets ME MAD!!!!
Posted by: marsha marsha | March 2, 2012, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
It is so sad that Limbaugh’s followers don’t realize when he is lying because they don’t read or watch real news! He lied about everything he claimed Ms. Fluke said!
Posted by: Librarian53 | March 2, 2012, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
“She has the right to do with her body what ever she wants, just don’t expect others to pay for your personal choice.”
This is hilarious. As others have pointed out, the issue is not asking TAXPAYERS to cover birth control, it’s asking that it be covered by INSURANCE for which one already pays premiums. So, you know, Rush has the right to do with his body whatever he wants, but if I’m covered by the same insurer he is, I sure hope he doesn’t expect my premiums to pay for the health problems his drug abuse and weight issues no doubt incur.
Posted by: Rachel | March 2, 2012, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
How far we have fallen in our morals in this country. This is just another example of why Government run healthcare will be too expensive!! Look it’s already started with his single issue!!
Would you pay for someone elses sexual desires, if it were coming directly out of your pocket, for some person who comes up to you off the street and says”I wanna have sex with by girlfriend or boyfriend.” “Will you please give me $5 bucks or $10 bucks so I can buy a condom or a pill to keep us so-called safe?” I doubt it very much. But if the “Government does it, it’s OK!! It’s our money folks!! Why are we being asked to pay, so someone else can play hanky panky with our money!! This is not healthcare it’s having sex, for the enjoyment of having it at your expense!! Wake Up!! America!! We’re going down the tubes!!
Posted by: Huck-Finn | March 2, 2012, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Is this the woman who is on scholarship for a Georgetown law degree who “can’t afford” contraceptives? She and others “have no choice” when insurance doesn’t cover her copay? How about a condom or paying for it yourself? I bet her parents are proud.
Posted by: Jimmy | March 2, 2012, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
” I’ve spent time in the Middle East and the Right in this country has more in common with the Islamic fundamentalist zealots than they know.”
POSTED BY: JEFF
What goofball nonsense. And anyway, liberals love the ” Islamic fundamentalist zealots”, and Obama believes we need to constantly apologize to them in hopes that they will perhaps, maybe (not) like us better.
Posted by: john samson | March 2, 2012, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Rush was way out of line. No name calling please… we aren’t in third grade. However, birth control should be covered for medical reasons. Most planned parenthoods or gynocologists provide free birth control. You may get only 3 – 6 months free but it helps. Everyone wonders why all the jobs are going overseas. The cost for every employee benefit. Everytime someone goes to the doctor for every sniffle and stumped toe it goes against that regional section of whatever insurance company is used. that is why your premiums go up, or your employers. What happened to the $250.00 or $300.00 deductible then 80% paid by insurance & 20% paid by insurer. Still have wellness checks, but hey, it is not everybody’s job to pay for everybody else. Can’t afford birth control pills and it is not a health issue, use condems. You can get them free or buy them. Skip a beer or a glass of wine. Geez, people grow up & take care of yourself. The government should govern not raise you. I’ll raise my own children and help out a neighbor in NEED. Birth control that is not a medical necessity is NOT a NEED.
Posted by: REALLY | March 2, 2012, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Shame on Rush and all of these other hate filled blowhards..and many that are posting agreeing comments arent any better..think for YOURSELF for once and quit looking at each party as if it is a football game..
listen to yourself..if you can sit and agree with Rush on this, you are sick and need help. This is true for o”reilly, beck etc. Any of them. Rush is aiding to the dumbing down of this country and a lot of commenters here are sick.
Posted by: doctor realist | March 2, 2012, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Ultimately insurance companies must recover their $1000/year costs through premiums. I can’t help but wonder who does Fluke expect will pay for her government mandated entitlement?
Maybe she believes it will be those working stiffs in India where our jobs have been exported to, due to the rising labor costs, and cheap offshore labor?
It’s amazing how easy it is to demand someone else pay your way, instead of carrying your own weiight. Greece here we come!
Posted by: JustOutsourced | March 2, 2012, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Rush volunteered to supply aspirin to the women at Georgetown. I think he should have offered to furnish oxycontin.
Posted by: Jay | March 2, 2012, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
This “I demand and thus am entitled” crap is more than just shameful. It’s flat-out thievery.Etc…”
POSTED BY: MICHAEL STANTON
Is it thievery for me to demand you pay for my police? STDs are every bit as much a public safety issue as any other disease, contracting the flu is preventable. And unwanted children are GREATER economic drains on society than it could ever cost to pay for this women’s health care, even if we cover expensive brands of BC pills in the event of the patient having an adverse reaction to the generics.
Posted by: Zach L | March 2, 2012, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
“As others have pointed out, the issue is not asking TAXPAYERS to cover birth control, it’s asking that it be covered by INSURANCE for which one already pays premiums.”
If I knew how, I’d make a program do nothing but post this continually 10 times a second. Techies, an amateur anthropologist needs you!
Posted by: zach l | March 2, 2012, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Wow. I was stunned by Limbaugh’s slanderous comments about the young woman who was allowed to testify about how employers banning certain medications for religious reasons, was harming women. I’m sickened by the comments. The thing is that 99% of the comments attacking the student, are factually incorrect. Really folks.. do you old angry men just listen to Rush and comment, without even reading the story?
This is NOT about any of you paying for a women’s contraceptive. She is talking about her coverage at school. A private school that offers health coverage to employees and such. Doesn’t cost you fools a thing. Doesn’t matter if a woman needs the pill for medical reasons, or birth control, you take one each day, and it costs around $100.00 a month. The republicans need to STOP their war on women… If this is a preview of the General Election, you guys will be lucky if you don’t lose every single incumbent across the board.
Seriously. What would someone with Limbaugh’s particular proclivities, know about birth control? I admit he does know about prostitution.. based on his arrest early in his radio career, when he was Jeff Christie. Amazing who the right wing consider as their heroes.
Posted by: Trixie | March 2, 2012, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
I don’t see why this is such a big issue anyway. Most successful insurance companies will continue to cover birth control on their formularies because any intelligent person knows that covering birth control is cheaper than covering maternity/labor & delivery care. It’s pretty simple math people. If one can’t afford birth control, they won’t use it, which means higher likelihood of pregnancy (because humans like to have sex and will continue to do it even without birth control) which means higher costs from hospital stays as a results of the increased pregnancies.
This is why most health insurance companies will continue to cover birth control. Some hoity-toity religious based ones won’t which is why the people they cover will continue to have like 14 kids a piece, further putting a strain on the economy and the planet.
Posted by: midwestte | March 2, 2012, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Why didn’t Rush offer some of his legally or illegally obtained pain pills to Ms. Fluke instead of aspirin since he has gone through rehabilitation and shouldn’t need them anymore or does he????
Posted by: Keith Munson | March 3, 2012, 12:11 am 12:11 am
“Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In their greed, these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up.” 2 Peter 2:2,3
Who said she wanted condoms ? The young woman was testifying about women’s contraception that was ALSO needed for a medical condition that only women have. Sheeeesh. Rush is an idiot. Or is he? Is he misleading you in hateful stupidity or intentionally leading you in stupid rants because he likes division and for people to be divided by race and gender.
Rush counts on you not EVER thinking or investigating any of his spew. Good job on helping him out! And being downtrodden yourselves, you love to have someone to hate…makes you feel big, for a while. And Rush knows you will echo his lies as truth until everyone like you, believes that girls want you to pay for their condoms.
If you thought for even a tiny moment…” $3K – yes that would be a lot of condoms but, ummmm wait a sec, women don’t use condoms, do they ?”
“Many will follow Rush’s shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute. In his greed, Rush will exploit you with stories he has made up.”
Posted by: Wondering Woman | March 3, 2012, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Any conservative women who would abide any man calling any woman a slut on radio should examine herself, whether or not she is truly in the faith. Fluke could be your daughter or sister or mother. What makes her a slut? The venal screams of a clearly ungodly and immoral man who just happens to be a conservative? Rush Limbaugh is not only not a Christian; he is an unrepentant, ungodly heathen whom all true believers should avoid. His words reek of the superfluity of naughtiness the Bible declares will be the lot of those who are lost. My warning is to those who have named the name of Christ–the word says to depart from iniquity. Rush Limbaugh is not good for America or for Godly people. He is, in his flesh, an adversary of Christ. His words betray him, and those who would ignore their frowardness do so at their immortal peril. “wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, thus saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing.” When he derides a young woman he doesn’t know by saying he wants to see videos and pictures of her, he betrays his own lasciviousness and carnality. His verbal abuse of Ms Fluke is a shameful, unmanly, and ungodly attempt to assert authority. A four-time divorcee, it is clear he knows little of true socially conservative values
Posted by: Karl | March 3, 2012, 12:47 am 12:47 am
One thing I think very interesting–Rush expects his health insurer to pay for his rehab for abusing prescription drugs–but that’s an “illness” and not a “lifestyle” thing. Many girls (including myself) have been prescribed birth control pills to treat horrible menstrual pain (in my case, it was a bad as gallstones). Apparently it is a “lifestyle” choice to be out of pain. It is a “lifestyle” choice to shrink ovarian cysts. It is a “lifestyle” choice for a married woman to prevent possibly fatal pre-eclampsia.
But drug addiction is an “illness”, and not a “lifestyle choice”. Interesting, that.
Posted by: mellers | March 3, 2012, 12:55 am 12:55 am
@Librarian53–That is, indeed, a valid point. In the case of Reynolds v United States (the case which outlawed polygamy) the Court rulled that “Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices.” But while the 1st Admendment rights are not absolute, that doesn’t mean the federal government can impose their will on how a religion can conduct how they can practice their religion in ALL cases. Former Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day O’Connor, while she concurred with the majority opinion in Employment Division, Department of Oregon v. Smith (1990) that said the state could refuse to grant someone unemployment if they used peyote even for religious practices, she also pointed out that even a law of general applicability could infringe upon a person’s free exercise if that law prevented them from practicing their faith or forcing them to go against what their faith forbids, and that the 1st Amendment must apply to both religion and applicable laws because otherwise the 1st Amendment would be reduced to “the barest level of minimum scrutiny that the Equal Protection Clause already provides.”
Posted by: MJ McNulty | March 3, 2012, 2:08 am 2:08 am
DOCTOR REALIST, lol, thanks for your offer of a guilt trip, but most of us plan to vacation elsewhere. What is shameful is that this ditz wishes and even demands that others foot the bill for her own hedonistic lifestyle.
Posted by: reality for real | March 3, 2012, 7:12 am 7:12 am
“Congrats to Rush for being right again. All the whining and venom from dreary drips actually shows just how right he was.”
POSTED BY: CONGRATS
That about sums it up.
Posted by: joseph levine | March 3, 2012, 7:13 am 7:13 am
“He lied about everything he claimed Ms. Fluke said!”
POSTED BY: LIBRARIAN53
No, Ms. Bot, it is only you, as usual, who is lying. Rush told the truth.
Posted by: truth and lies | March 3, 2012, 7:16 am 7:16 am
“What makes her a slut?…”
POSTED BY: KARL
Only everything she presented in her own comments before Congress. Keep up with the obvious, mate.
Posted by: jackie lawson | March 3, 2012, 7:27 am 7:27 am
“If you thought for even a tiny moment…” $3K – yes that would be a lot of condoms but, ummmm wait a sec, women don’t use condoms, do they ?”
POSTED BY: WONDERING WOMAN
If you ever thought for even a tiny moment, $3K is a vast exaggeration of the expense even for birth control pills, considering that one can get them for less than a third of that cost for 3 years, and in many cases, even entirely for free. Wise up, and get honest.
Posted by: marlena michellin | March 3, 2012, 7:31 am 7:31 am
“If you thought for even a tiny moment…” $3K – yes that would be a lot of condoms but, ummmm wait a sec, women don’t use condoms, do they ?”
POSTED BY: WONDERING WOMAN
“If you ever thought for even a tiny moment, $3K is a vast exaggeration of the expense even for birth control pills, considering that one can get them for less than a third of that cost for 3 years, and in many cases, even entirely for free. Wise up, and get honest.”
POSTED BY: MARLENA MICHELLIN
Yeah, she was lying pretty badly, and when not flatly lying, she was being highly disingenuous.
What a fluke, lol.
Posted by: meg w | March 3, 2012, 7:33 am 7:33 am
As is often the case, my original reply post was later deleted for no legitimate reason whatsoever, apart from the glaring liberal bias of ABC, but anyway…
This “I demand and thus am entitled” crap is more than just shameful. It’s flat-out thievery.Etc…”
POSTED BY: MICHAEL STANTON
“Is it thievery for me to demand you pay for my police?…”
POSTED BY: ZACH L
Sorry, ZACH L, but if you recognized and embraced any sense of elementary logic at all, you’d see the striking difference between paying for police and paying for the unwanted consequences of someone’s personal and freely-chosen sexual activities. I realize you chose not to see that striking difference, but most of us with some common sense can readily see it.
Posted by: michael Stanton | March 3, 2012, 7:49 am 7:49 am
These issues reflect hypocracy and actully are periferal to the main point of honestly confronting the promisscuitty in the gay community.
Posted by: liz | March 3, 2012, 7:52 am 7:52 am
“Limbaugh’s mother should have had an abortion.”
POSTED BY: LIZ
An your mother should have sterilized from the get go, since she was mentally disabled.
Posted by: Her inner demons | March 3, 2012, 7:54 am 7:54 am
Fluke was raising the case of her friend needing the pill for medical reasons, not contraception; hence, the steep costs. Learn to absorb what you read and grasp the Big Picture for once.
Typical Holey-Babble, cherry-pickin’ tighty-righties. You’re precisely why our country is stuck in the Bronze Age and the laughing-stock among fellow first-world countries. Grow up already, and get some empathy while you’re at it.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 8:06 am 8:06 am
She may or may not be a slut, but she sure played one in front of Congress.
Posted by: lexingtonlady | March 3, 2012, 8:11 am 8:11 am
“Grow up already.”
POSTED BY: LIZ
Yes some, including you, do need to really grow up.
Posted by: laura | March 3, 2012, 8:16 am 8:16 am
“An (sic) your mother should have [been?] sterilized from the get go, since she was mentally disabled.”
POSTED BY: HER INNER DEMONS
Eh…I give it a 2 out of 10.
Try again.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I want and demand that my health care provide all of the following, totally free to me, for my health naturally:
1) Vitamins (Good for my overall health).
2) A nose job (My current large nose causes me stress, hence very unhealthy).
3) A gym membership (Exercise is good for my health).
And (4)…A long vacation to the mountains (Fresher air would definitely improve my health).
Yes, and on and on it goes — endless demands and wishes.
POSTED BY: WHAT I WANT
“Yes, I want and demand a new sports car, to help improve my sex life, which will surely be covered.”
POSTED BY: FELIX HORNBLOWER
“Pot should also be covered. It relaxes me, and is thus good for my health.”
POSTED BY: JOE BONG
“Very funny, but also very true.”
POSTED BY: INCONVENIENT REALITY
“Too bad there’s so many lengthy and mostly worthless posts in between the good ones.”
POSTED BY: MAD MAXINE
These are good demands. Quite reasonable. LOL.
Posted by: reasonable demands | March 3, 2012, 8:20 am 8:20 am
“These issues reflect hypocracy and actully are periferal to the main point of honestly confronting the promisscuitty in the gay community.”
POSTED BY: LIZ
Good point, LIZ. “hypocracy” is spelled wrong, however.
Posted by: cassandra | March 3, 2012, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Congrats to Rush for being right again. All the whining and venom from dreary drips actually shows just how right he was.
Posted by: CONGRATS | March 3, 2012, 8:28 am 8:28 am
“Yes some, including you, do need to really grow up.”
POSTED BY: LEXINGTONLADY
Compelling argument.
Thank you for your time.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 8:29 am 8:29 am
“These issues reflect hypocracy and actully are periferal to the main point of honestly confronting the promisscuitty in the gay community.”
POSTED BY: LIZ
Posting sober is always the wiser course of action, or get into school if you can’t spelll any better than that.
Posted by: let's post sober | March 3, 2012, 8:34 am 8:34 am
3 things:
1. Fluke is no fluke. She is a reproductive rights activist…and, a pawn of the left. The media has no interest in telling you this. They want you to believe Fluke is just a college student.
2. Free birth control IS NOT FREE. It is funded by the other insurance customers via higher premiums….but, IT IS NOT FREE.
3. Rush Limbaugh should have used other words to describe Fluke. No excuses here. But, what Limbaugh was saying is that Fluke claims her contraception costs are $3000 during law school….and, that can buy a lot of condoms and birth control pills. Do the math: if the pill costs $10 per month x 36 months (3 years of law school) = $360 … which she can afford. But, if condoms cost st $1.00 each, you could buy 3600 condoms. In a 3 year period, the only people who use 3600 condoms are either prostitutes or sluts. Do you get his humor?
It sounds like the media on the left have become the type pf people they claim to despise.
Posted by: CAPE COD PAULIE | March 3, 2012, 8:51 am 8:51 am
It’s times like these when I am ashamed to be a gay liberal.
Posted by: noflyzone2 | March 3, 2012, 8:53 am 8:53 am
“It’s times like these when I am ashamed to be a gay liberal.”
POSTED BY: NOFLYZONE2
One silly Fluke can not destroy our work.
Posted by: davem | March 3, 2012, 8:58 am 8:58 am
NOFLYZONE2: Can’t say I blame you. Take that in its literal sense.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 9:06 am 9:06 am
“Grow up already.”
POSTED BY: LIZ
Yes some, including you, do need to really grow up.
POSTED BY: LAURA
—
LAURA: My response of: ‘Compelling argument. Thank you for your time’ was directed to you, not LEXINGTONLADY. My apologies to LL.
CASSANDRA and LET’S POST SOBER: That was not my post.
CASSANDRA: ‘Promiscuity’ and ‘peripheral’ are also misspelled.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“Posting sober is always the wiser course of action, or get into school if you can’t spelll any better than that.”
POSTED BY: LET’S POST SOBER:
‘Spelll’?
Oopsies.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Get a grip, LIZ, no one cares. Your posts aren’t that important.
Posted by: get a grip | March 3, 2012, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“Get a grip, LIZ, no one cares. Your posts aren’t that important.”
POSTED BY: GET A GRIP
Liz is having fun pretending anyone reads her silly posts.
Posted by: randy z | March 3, 2012, 9:35 am 9:35 am
To all lib women complaining about the cost, Wal Mart, Wal Greens Sell Generic Birth control pills at $8-12 for one month supply.(for libs who will need a calculator to figure out annual cost, It is $96 to $120) And a Gynocologist on TV said they give free samples to patients provided by pharma companies. He also said the women can live with one ovary if other one is removed due to medical issues just like kidneys.
So I will tell all ignorant Lib morons “Get the Fluke out of here”. cause you all have been Fluked.
Have a nice day
Posted by: Dennis | March 3, 2012, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Get a grip, LIZ, no one cares. Your posts aren’t that important.
POSTED BY: GET A GRIP
—
GET A GRIP: At least you read them.
—
“Get a grip, LIZ, no one cares. Your posts aren’t that important.”
POSTED BY: GET A GRIP
Liz is having fun pretending anyone reads her silly posts.
POSTED BY: RANDY Z
—
RANDY Z: Well, *you* did.
Y’all have a nice day.
Posted by: Liz | March 3, 2012, 10:11 am 10:11 am
I say sue Rush for defamation of character.
Posted by: chris | March 3, 2012, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
RB obviously has no clue how birth control even works. It’s not about “having so much sex” if you are using hormonal BC (pill, ring, etc.). Even if you only have sex once a month, you still need the same amount of birth control as if you were having sex several times a day. NOT that sex is bad.
The real people to blame, if we’re playing that game…. drugs companies for charging so much.
Also, I’d like to see RB have a coversation with one of these women’s partners. I guess he’d have to convince them to stop having sex with his girlfriend/wife? Good luck with that one, assbag.
Blame the woman, obviously only women like and have sex. Obviously pregnancy (and thus the desire to prevent it) is a woman’s responsibility and fault. no guy needed, duh. yeah, immaculate conception!
Posted by: chrlt | March 3, 2012, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
The last word must be mine. Move aside. Fluke is a flake.
Posted by: liz | March 3, 2012, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Most people understand how birth control is taken. They know that whether you are engaging in frequent sex or no sex at all the bc pills have to be taken the same way. Most people read or listened to this woman’s speech before the committee and know that she never mentioned her sexual history. But unfortunately there are many people who live in a world completely defined by their beliefs. They want to believe she is promiscuous so therefore she is sexual promiscuous. No amount of objective evidence or reason will ever get through to these people unless they decide to become rational beings capable of listening and not carrying so much baggage about everywhere. Realize the futility of arguing with these people and stop wasting your time. Instead focus on what you can do that can make a positive difference.
Posted by: e | March 3, 2012, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
What’s with all these idiotic comments about her testifying on behalf of only herself . She was testifying on behalf of her dead friend who got cancer after she could no longer afford the birth control her doctor had prescribed for the prevention of ovarian cysts . She could no longer afford it, her insurance company denied it because it was not covered under Georgetown’s plan and she developed ovarian cysts and then cancer ! srsly have any of you actually listened to the testimony ?!?!??!??!??!?!?? you are all providing a 100% false narrative for your arguments .
Posted by: anon | March 3, 2012, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I think Santorum is right in a way. I think Rush is being over the top – deliberately. He’s being theatrical, in order to get a point across in a way that will grab the listener’s attention. If Fluke wants to take it personally, she’s just being hypersensitive; or as a way of “silencing” women, she’s just putting her own spin on it. It’s unfortunate that women get stuck taking most of the responsibility for birth control because of our biological role and frequent male irresponsibility… that said, does it mean that the taxpayers are responsible for bailing women out of our predicament? Even if we had no choice in the matter or no control over our predicament, would the taxpayers be morally responsible? This is the root of the point that Rush is making and that Fluke is too caught up in her assumptions about women’s supposed “rights” to see.
Posted by: Anne Martin | March 3, 2012, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
What ever happened to planned parenthood that our tax dollars are subsidizing? If you want cheap birth control you pay for your exam you get a perscription and go to Wal*Mart and it’s $5 a month for a generic brand. 5*12 = $60 a year. Not to mention that there are LGBTU groups in almost every major university in this country that hand out condoms as if they were candy. It is not hard to get contraceptives and since when was that a gauranteed right in the US Constitution? Oh yeah, did you liberals forget about that. The federal government is restricted by the constitution and is only granted certain powers and those that are not listed are reserved for the states.
Plus to the commenter who posted about the religious institutions being below the law of the land, that is true and no one is questioning that, but we have a certain ammendment to our constitution that garauntees the freedom to practice religion, and that the government has no right to restrict our right to practice it. Since when was it a garaunteed right to women that all tax payers have to pay for their contraceptives. Most insurance companies will pay for it anyways if you give them a call or you have a valid medical reason for the use of the birth control pills. Quit misinforming the American public you people really make me sick to my stomach.
Posted by: Steve Radonich IV | March 3, 2012, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Lush Rimbaugh speaks on a topic he actually knows about. ….paying for sex.
Posted by: Fin | March 3, 2012, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
How the hell are taxpayers suddenly responsible for birth control? Are you all ignorant, or just so full of hate and vitriol that you have to spew it out whenever you can?
None of this has to be about taxpayers paying for BC, it’s about making sure women have access to it in their insurance plan. . .which, just like any other insurance plan, the person pays monthly for. The church has a big problem with it, but for the wrong reasons. This woman’s testimony was an example as to why its important that even church affiliated groups offer birth control coverage, because there are serious conditions which have absolutely nothing to do with pregnancy that require birth control to be managed. The whole reason they REFUSE is because pregnancy prevention is against their religion. The problem lies in the fact that not all people use birth control pills for this reason, therefore their argument is invalid in these cases. This does not, in any way infringe upon their religious beliefs. If they, however, decide to let a woman die because she has one of these life-threatening illnesses and they refuse to ALLOW THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO OFFER BIRTH CONTROL COVERAGE UNDER THEIR PLAN. . .how are they any better than murderers?
The only way the taxpayers would be involved is if those church affiliated groups refused this coverage. So, why not get mad at the churches instead of the women? If they are so far in the dark ages that they don’t realize that there are real complications women can face that REQUIRES them to be put on birth control just to manage it (HAVING ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH SEX) then that is on them. The woman should NOT be the one taking the blame. Anyone who defends allowing a woman to die due to some outdated dark-age belief that women should be baby machines should just go back into their cave, stay there, and leave the rest of us alone.
It’s all got to turn into some idiotic conversation about “WELL GOLLYGEE WHIZ why dun’t she just buy her some con-doms,” or “Well, why should I have to pay for someone else’s perversity and heathen ways?” which is completely missing the ENTIRE POINT of the whole argument. . .and the reason you are missing it is because you’re actually EXCITED to get to be pissed off at something, so you don’t even bother TRYING to understand it before you spew your ignorance.
And- Just a special message to the especially ignorant Steve Radonich. . . The whole point of this debate, in case you missed it in the above, is about how church affiliated insurance plans DO NOT ALLOW BIRTH CONTROL TO BE COVERED AT ALL. If they would just ALLOW the option (considering many of the people who work for church affiliated hospitals and whatnot actually do NOT belong to said church it SHOULDN’T be a big deal) then the taxpayers WILL NEVER BE INVOLVED. EVER. Just allow the option, which does NOT mean FORCE all of the women to use birth control. If they are a member of that religion, they don’t have to unless they have a dire medical condition. Case CLOSED. Denying birth control to a woman who works for you that is NOT of your religion, that is infringing upon HER rights. Just like if you had a vegetarian boss, they shouldn’t be allowed to only offer you health insurance if you are also a vegetarian.
I don’t understand how the hell people have taken this issue and turned it into “suddenly, we’re all responsible for every woman’s sexual deviance. . ” Jesus Christ, grow some brains, people!
Posted by: Ghost | March 3, 2012, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
Hope she sues the Limp for every penny he has. The man, (poor choice of words) is a total abomination. No radio station worth listening to carries his show and the rest should dump him immediately. Remember Imus Rush, you may be the next to go!
Posted by: El Wil | March 3, 2012, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Just looking at the comments on this message board, it’s no wonder the US is so dysfunctional. We have nobody to blame except ourselves, not the politicians.
It’s OK to have your own opinion, but there is a difference between fact & fiction.
If voters don’t open themselves up to the TRUE facts, ignorant comments and votes are the result, which is where we are today.
Posted by: Ed | March 4, 2012, 6:56 am 6:56 am
I used to think the US was a first world country.
I know third-world countries that have more rational discourse than this. Also, many average citizens in third world countries know more about birth control than Republicans.
It’s really sad how far the US has fallen. This is why the US is rapidly falling behind China. If you hate science and facts so much, all you do is harm the country. In ten, twenty years, the Chinese will be the world’s leading superpower. The US will be a faint whisper in the wind. All our advantages, all ourresearch for naught, because a few bible thumpers decided that all that made us strong shouldn’t matter anymore. Because to them, belief should supercede fact.
You cannot expect our companies to excel when you attack basic fundamental science that all countries that actually are successful use.
Posted by: A sad American | March 4, 2012, 7:39 am 7:39 am
“Fluke spoke of one friend in particular who needed contraception to prevent ovarian cysts.” This is true. There are many people who have to take birth control pills for reasons other than preventing pregnancy. It is amazing how many men posting here are the ones making nasty comments. I have to wonder how some of you treat the women in your lives.
Posted by: EJW | March 4, 2012, 8:08 am 8:08 am
What do the Democrats have against babies??? Anyone knows–especially college students– that Planned Parenthood, college infirmary, local county health dept will give you “FREE” (someone is paying for it since nothing is free) birth control so you can have as much sex as you want. So why are the Democrats pretending this is a hardship on women?? Is it because Obama said he didn’t want his daughters “punished with a baby” in 2008 while in Pennsylvania at a town hall meeting on Saturday afternoon. Or do they agree with Obama when he voted AGAINST the Born Alice Infant Protection Act in 2002 while a Chicago Senator?? Is this how Independents think too???
Posted by: whathappened08 | March 4, 2012, 11:32 am 11:32 am
As an older woman, I find Rush’s coments completely disqusting. What makes him think that it is OK to talk about women in general like that ? Does he think women are human beings that only want sex? There are LOTS of reasons women take birth control pills,not just for sex. He odviously has not read much or tried to understand women and their bodily needs. I wonder if he would say such terrible things if this concerned men or his problems with drugs!!!
Companies need to stop advertising on his show-Think about it Pro Flowers.
Posted by: Susie | March 4, 2012, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
This issue isn’t about Fluke, Obama, Rush Limpon, or anyone else. It’s a very simple matter. It’s about women’s health and the Pope who controls it. It would be about counter-cyclic potato marketing if that gave them more control. The church always wants to increase it’s control over people’s lives–and the more extremely personal they can intrude, the more control they have. Pregnancy, abortion, euthanasia, sex, terrifying children, funerals–every issue that’s personal, the church wants to dominate. They couldn’t care less about virtue or morality. They rape kids, and their leader justifies it. They teach condoms spread aids. They scream about “personhood” of the fetus–but how many have funerals for miscarriages? They teach kids they’re actually eating a dead body and drinking it’s blood. ITS ALL MARKETING STRATEGY. THE ONE WHO SEEMS LIKE THE GOOD GUY GETS HIS WAY. THEY WANT TO HAVE THEIR WAY, THEY WANT YOUR MONEY, AND THEY WANT TO OWN YOU. Everything else is staging for this one goal: CONTROL. Control the people, control the world. Anyone else tired of having the most evil people among us making the most personal decisions imaginable? Whether we are right or wrong in our personal decisions–they are OUR DECISIONS. YOU DO NOT OWN US. THIS DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU!
Posted by: datagod | March 5, 2012, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Now I know why you’re called liberals…
You liberals are willing to kill your own baby or risk your health just for the gratification of sex, sex, sex.
What is it that you liberals eat or otherwise consume that drives you to your unconscionable sex and bunny rabbit behavior? If only I could identify it, I would render it down to a powerful aphrodisiac that I could market to the animal husbandry interests and make a fortune.
I will look for the answer in this forum…Thanks
Posted by: AF19693730 | March 5, 2012, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Still no comment from Congressmen on the Right. It takes a full 2 seconds to condemn Limbaugh’s remarks and yet no one from the Right has done it. Are we to assume you agree, House Repulicans? We don’t want to think you do, but you’ve said nothing…
Posted by: Justin P. | March 5, 2012, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Think folks. Planned Parenthood is a multi-billion dollar mega machine. The way they got there was by turning pregnancy into an illness. Pregnancy is not an illness and never has been. Now we are seeing sex being turned into an illness so it can be funded also. It is that simple and the reason Rush is all over it as he should be. People need to know the real truth. It’s all about m-o-n-e-y.
Posted by: R Stone | March 5, 2012, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Anyone else surprised that in every picture of him, he seems to be sucking on a giant brown cigar? Is he trying to tell us something?
Rush Limbaugh is just trying to take the focus off himself. He knows that he earned the nickname “Dutch Oven” from several wives divorcing him because he eats too much and farts in bed all night long. Rumor has it that he thought it was funny to trap them under the blanket while farting, and they divorced him as a result. Hence the widespread nickname “Dutch Oven.”It’s clear that in a childish attempt to distract the public from this, he’s heaping undeserved insults onto a poor college student who’s college has engaged in the aggressive manipulation of fertility. It’s high time he apologize for how his utter lack of control over his base urges are destroying lives around him with the putred stench of is ginormous gut. It’s time for the “Dutch Oven” to own up to his sins. If the Pope is going to side with him, he needs to ask for forgiveness for the cause of his own divorces.
Posted by: datagod | March 6, 2012, 5:00 am 5:00 am
Birth Control for any reason still isn’t $1000 a year. Come on people, Walmart has $9 prescriptions. Can’t you see this was just a lightning rod, planted by the left, she shouldn’t have been testifying anyway, testifying for what! The rich kids in Georgetown University have at least $9 a month for BC Pills, they spend that on a Starbuck’s coffee.
Posted by: Bev Schlein | March 6, 2012, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
It would be nice if those who ditto Rush’s words would take the time to acquaint themselves with what Sandra Fluke actually said.
Posted by: AuntieMaine | March 6, 2012, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Maybe the government can kick all of the talk radio hosts off the air and throw them in prison, feed them bread and water, tar-and-feather them and any thing else one could imagine. Afterwards, patch into China national radio and listen to that until the government develops one of its own. May I listen to Joy, Bill M. or Wolf. All of this is so calculated, political and convenient.
Posted by: Satin | March 6, 2012, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
If Rush says so, then Almighty God says so! Who are YOU defy the Will of Almighty God? How DARE YOU Blasphemer!!! Submit to the Lord and his Will and be saved.
Posted by: m | March 7, 2012, 5:26 am 5:26 am
This whole thing is smoke and mirrors. The $3000 figure by Fluke should get a “pants on fire” rating. I personally feel that Limbaugh and mainstream media are in this together to cause a pointless “outrage” to distract from the reality that our liberty is being raped. This is obvious when you look at how ridiculous Limbaugh’s statements are. Concerning Fluke, as an American, I could care less about her sexual issues. That is HER problem! Btw, people of low income can go to their local health department and qualify for free birth control, so technically, we already are paying for contraception. The health insurance mandate for this is absolutely redundant, unnecessary and total baloney. It is all lies. Of course, I have come to expect no less of our current government and of the lemmings in our country who keep swallowing the bull and keep voting these clowns back into power. When are people going to wake up and realize that a truly free nation expects no entitlements or mandates because they expect to accept the consequences of liberty for better or worse. Finally, the last time I checked, it is the individual’s responsibility to manage their own hygene, sexual or otherwise. If you honestly can’t afford birth control, YOU need to suck it up and practice something called abstinence. Decent and free people don’t make their personal choices everyone else’s problem. Will you people wake up from all the lies? Will the people of this country ever care about things other than sex and entertainment? Are we now in the “cultural wasteland” phase that Jefferson warned us about? It is up to you, Americans. Will it be liberty or slavery for all?
Posted by: David Heath | March 7, 2012, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Rush Limbaugh is rude, crude, vulgar, and arrogant and he set a very bad example for our children. I hope he doesn’t have children. His comments against Sandra Fluke are disrespectful and derogatory. We can disagree with one another but we can do it respectfully and not demean and humiliate others to make us look better. Mind you, the result is just the opposite. I never listen to Limbaugh’s talk show and everytime I came across his station while switching channels, I quickly changed channels or completely turned off the radio. Even then, TV and radio stations including NPR are talking about him that it seems like I cant’ make this awful man disappear from my environment.
Posted by: Ordnry1 | March 7, 2012, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Why are most people here slamming the DEMS? Is there not a female republican that takes contraceptives? I guess not.
How come no one is talking about him saying, “So Miss Fluke, and the rest of you Feminazis, here’s the deal. If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex. We want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.” He has so much class!
I do agree that Rush and his peers have changed “news.” It seems to no longer be news but “News Entertainment.”
I am a Field Artilleryman, stationed at Fort Campbell but before this I worked for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and if ANYONE, regardless of political affiliation and their position in government, knew how health insurance worked, they would know the company an individual works for has the right to choose what coverages they want for their group plans. This is why it is so important to read your Explanation of Benefits handbook, as your employer and Insurance Carrier will not do so. Not because they do not like you, they just don’t make the time.
Posted by: CPL Brown | March 7, 2012, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Rush only offered aspirin? Surely he could throw in a little oxycontin or hydrocodone in with that, could he not?
Posted by: Meg | March 7, 2012, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
I’m guessing Rush “Dutch Oven” Limbaugh’s MAIN UNSPOKEN SPONSOR is likely the Catholic Church–and I’m sure we’ll never know.
I like how, whenever you point out what unbelievable gimps certain people are, it’s often automatically interpreted as support for their opposite party. This the kind of crap that goes on in a two-party state. There’s no reason they BOTH can’t be obnoxious trolls. They’re BOTH just as bad–from a different direction. The one’s who can afford to give you a job will steal your house. The one’s who won’t steal your house, will fill your neighborhood with crime. The one’s who aren’t shutting your children’s schools are filling them with gangs. The ones who prevent a depression will haul off with the treasury. The ones who protect your reproductive choices will put a lab coat on a fry-cook and call him a doctor. The one’s who don’t will let you bear a rape baby and die for “moral” reasons. The only ones capable of fixing their country will fix it so what’s yours becomes theirs.
Acknowledging this one simple fact is the only thing that could POSSIBLY save this country:
“FREEDOM” MEANS “ONE MORE WAY TO BE BENT OVER.”
THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN SAVE YOU WILL ENSLAVE YOU.”
Everything else in politics–and every debate about it, is a distraction–to keep you looking the other way while the rich keep going to the bank.
Posted by: m | March 8, 2012, 5:24 am 5:24 am
I like how, whenever you point out what unbelievable gimps certain people are, it’s often automatically interpreted as support for their opposite party. This the kind of crap that goes on in a two-party state. There’s no reason they BOTH can’t be obnoxious trolls. They’re BOTH just as bad–from a different direction. The one’s who can afford to give you a job will steal your house. The one’s who won’t steal your house, will fill your neighborhood with crime. The one’s who aren’t shutting your children’s schools are filling them with gangs. The ones who prevent a depression will haul off with the treasury. The ones who protect your reproductive choices will put a lab coat on a fry-cook and call him a doctor. The one’s who don’t will let you bear a rape baby and die for “moral” reasons. The only ones capable of fixing their country will fix it so what’s yours becomes theirs.Acknowledging this one simple fact is the only thing that could POSSIBLY save this country:”FREEDOM” MEANS “ONE MORE WAY TO BE BENT OVER.”THE ONLY ONES WHO CAN SAVE YOU WILL ENSLAVE YOU.”Everything else in politics–and every debate about it, is a distraction–to keep you looking the other way while the rich keep going to the bank.
Posted by: m | March 8, 2012, 8:38 am 8:38 am
LOL! Of course she would go on the Ed Show to plead her case. Nice non partisan show there, NOT.
Rush must be doing something right for the liberals to hate him so much.
Posted by: kate | March 8, 2012, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Leaving aside the incredibly inappropriate name-calling, Rush Limbaugh has his facts wrong – this debate is about requiring HEALTH INSURANCE to cover contraception, not the US government. Taxpayers are not being asked to pay for this, HEALTH INSURERS are.
Get it right, folks.
Posted by: Alison | March 10, 2012, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
There’s a difference between women using BC for MEDICINAL use and women using BC for RECREATIONAL use. Same situation applies to the whole Marijuana situation. I say we should provide those that require BC MEDICINALLY, but for those that are using it for pure recreation only, let them pay. Fluke should pay her own pay or lessen the amount of sex she has, and her “friend” should have BC covered by insurance.
Posted by: Mark | March 14, 2012, 9:28 am 9:28 am
There seems to be a complete lack of self control and common sense in all the parties involved here. While at this point in the nations economic woes it would be nice to see some shake up in the political parties I think they are missing the point. Ms. Fluke simply posed a statement/question. The answer could be as simple as “no”. Everyone that knows Rush, knows that he is an over spoken man that makes his living by colorizing controversy. To each thier own. Realistically the only people this truly bothers are the unqualified politicians that front scepticism over this matter. The fact is that almost everyone has sex. We all like it and we all assume the responsibility as adults to take the proper precautions. And if the unforeseen happens (malfunction of contraceptive), understand that children are a blessing (I am not saying go out and have 1 or 10), not an epidemic!
Posted by: Jay | March 14, 2012, 11:07 am 11:07 am
I believe the comment of slut was an opinion and I do not believe it is actionable. That being said, I really do not want to pay for any other individual’s BC and I really cannot believe she testified concerning this matter. The Untied States used to be a great place to live but now it appears that everything is assumed to be an entitlement and it is just a matter of time before taxes and healthcare costs are so high that places like China will start to look good. We have to draw the line somewhere and I believe covering BC for NON-Medical reasons is crazy. I also believe that this person that testified, in my opinion is an idiot.
Posted by: Tom | March 14, 2012, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
It just blows me away that so many people only catch the parts they want to hear in a story like this. First of all, they NEVER said it was $3000 for ONE year of law school. That was over the course of THREE years. Second, just take “the pill” into consideration. It doesn’t all cost the same, some brands cost a heck of a lot more than others. Also, some people take it for MEDICAL reasons, such as ovarian cysts, or painful irregular menstrual cycles. I started dating my husband over 7 years ago, and he’s been the only one I’ve ever been with. But, I take “the pill” to control painful cramps and irregularity… Does that make me a slut? Third, all these people talking about “not wanting to pay for another person’s birth control”… How can you say that when part of your tax money goes to things like welfare and unemployment.? You’ll pay for these things, but not for a woman to have something that makes her life better? Anyways, I don’t really care if anyone reads this, just some food for thought I guess…
Posted by: C | March 14, 2012, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
It blows my mind how many of you do not understand how birth control pills work… you can have sex once a month or every day and STILL HAVE TO TAKE THE SAME AMOUNT OF PILLS. It is not the fact that she is having “so much sex” that she cant afford it. She could be having sex with a significant other and may just not want to have children yet…. AND they may only have sex one or two times a month… but she still has to take the pill EVERYDAY. There is no sex to pill ratio you morons. Also keep in mind there are numerous reasons to take the pill other than preventing pregnancy. Ovarian cysts(as stated), endometriosis, prevention of abnormal cell growth(which can lead to ovarian cancer) are just a few. So think of how you would feel if your ‘slut’ sister has to take the pills to keep from getting cancer…. makes sense now huh?
Posted by: Brittney | March 14, 2012, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
What I want to know, is when was the last time Rush has been laid.
That would make a lot of sense regarding his comment
Posted by: Brandi | March 18, 2012, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Many of the posts here are a sad commentary why this country has slid so far. I guess we are headed for a civil war, Those on the right think they are the only side with guns, but I think they will be mistaken. We are headed for self destruction, Babylon we are.
Posted by: Stephen | March 20, 2012, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Really really simple solution, so simple you’ll be blown away:
Boyfriend keeps his pants on
WOW!!! that’s so simple!
I know,
I’m a genius
Posted by: Jonny | March 29, 2012, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Most AMERICANS are ignorants. First, she was advocating for women to get free BIRTH CONTROL PILLS, not CONDOMS. These pills are the same amount each month, so price stays constant. Second, birth control should be at least subsidized if it’s not going to be free. However, since Americans have proven themselves to lack intelligence, it’s probably a slight chance they won’t change this, just as well as free medical services for everyone. She’s an admirable woman for speaking up!!
Posted by: FREE MEDICINE | May 3, 2012, 1:24 am 1:24 am