Feb 12, 2012 12:53pm

Jack Lew Defends Tax Increases in 2013 Budget, Insists Congress Extend Payroll Tax Cut

abc jacob lew nt 120212 wblog Jack Lew Defends Tax Increases in 2013 Budget, Insists Congress Extend Payroll Tax Cut

ABC

Less than 24 hours before President Obama’s 2013 budget is delivered to Congress, White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew aimed to pre-empt the inevitable onslaught of criticism Sunday, defending the budget’s $1.3 trillion in additional deficit spending and $1.5 trillion in added tax revenue.

“We have tax cuts that go to people who don’t need them,” Lew told me on “This Week.”  “We have tax cuts going to the wealthiest people in America who are going to have to pay their fair share.”

Similar to his 2012 budget, the president’s 2013 budget calls for a minimum tax rate of 30 percent for millionaires and ends the Bush tax cuts for high-income earners.

Lew said that for every dollar of revenue, the budget includes $2.50 in spending cuts, including cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, agriculture subsidies and federal civilian workers’ pensions. Over the next decade, Lew said, the president’s proposal will reduce spending so it will no longer add to the deficit and will create stability in the economy.

But despite the cuts, the president’s budget would mark the fourth straight year deficit spending that exceeds $1 trillion. The deficit spending comes after Obama pledged upon taking office in 2009 that he would “cut the deficit we inherited by half by the end of my first term in office.”

Lew defended that failed pledge on Sunday.

“When we took office, the economy was falling so fast that the first thing we had to do was put a bottom in,” Lew said. “That cost money in the Recovery Act.  It cost money in terms of lost revenue and slower economic growth.  We’re on track now.  We’ve seen several months of sustained economic growth and job creation, but we’re not out of the woods yet.”

Lew said the “American people should be pleased” with the recent uptick in the economy, but emphasized that the slow recovery is still in need of an “extra push,” which Lew said should come in the form of a payroll tax holiday extension.

The tax cut extension is currently stalled in a conference committee as the House and Senate seek to reconcile how to pay for extension. Lew called on Congress to “finish their work” and pass the payroll tax cut “on time.”

House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said he believes the tax cut will be extended but blamed Obama and Democratic Party leaders for the delay, saying they are “not engaging” in compromise conversations.

“We’ve taken provisions from the president’s own budget as ways of paying for this payroll tax holiday, yet they continue to insist on not agreeing to those kinds of things,” Ryan said in an exclusive interview on “This Week.” “It’s difficult to see exactly how this is going to pan out.”

Ryan said the American people would recognize that the House is acting while the Senate is stalling such legislation. Thus, he said, he is not concerned that Congress’ dismally low 10 percent approval rating would result in Republicans losing control of the House in the 2012 election.

“There’s a very big difference between all the action to deal with our country’s big problems in the House and just the total inaction by the Senate,” Ryan said. “The House is acting and the Senate is sitting on their hands playing partisan politics.”

Lew defended the Senate, pointing out that the upper chamber has to get 60 votes in order to pass a budget, a feat he said was a “challenge” when there is “no willingness to work together.”

SHOWS:

User Comments

A budget that is not balanced is not in the national interest.

Posted by: Girish | February 12, 2012, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Just come up with another entitlement program and then make it part of the general fund. What’s the problem?

Posted by: newcountryman | February 12, 2012, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

When looking at the past budgets on the FDsys (A government online publication) noted deficits generally rise highest mostly among republican presidents. although not exclusive to republican presidents, but heck, all of a sudden they are concerned. In 2000 tax revenues received for on budget was 2,025,198 trillion in 2009 2,104,995 trillion, now in between those two time frames 2 wars, addition of Homeland Security and 200,000 government employees and medicare part D under both a republican and dual house republican majority were propagated.

Posted by: emerald_sparks | February 12, 2012, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

When was the last time a republican president had a balanced budget?

Posted by: emerald_sparks | February 12, 2012, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

We’ll see how many Dem votes this budget gets, remember last years? Even the Dems wouldn’t support it.

Posted by: Todd | February 12, 2012, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

They need to stop taking from SS and Medicare taxes and do real tax reform.

They are all talk and no action when it comes to tax reform which was needed yesterday!

The Republicans keep protecting their sacred election donors while the American public suffers.

And, no I am not a Democrat. I am a Republican who is sick of seeing our politicians put their jobs before our country. They have been there for decades destroying this country with their special interest K Street Puppet masters and it is time for them to all go. Washington DC has become a sewer full of rats!

Posted by: C4LCNCPLS | February 12, 2012, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Let’s see, if we add $1.5 trillion in revenues and spend ANOTHER $1.3 trillion, our deficit will now be around $800 billion annually instead of $1 trillion. So it is true we won’t add to the annual deficit, we will be $200 billion lower, but we are nowhere near cutting Obama’s “”inherited”" deficit from Bush as Obama promised. Not even close.

Posted by: commonsenseparty | February 13, 2012, 1:38 am 1:38 am

I have never seen anything like the ignorance displayed by Mr. Lew. We as a country a facing a point of no return issue. I have seen first hand the issues in Europe especially those of Greece and Italy. By continuing to kick the can down the road and avoid the real issue – a ridiculously high deficit, we will very shortly experience the same issues facing the European community. I am in the twilight of my career and I realize addressing this issue will not be popular. It never is!! I have seen companies fail because they think they are too big to fail — they continue to push the hard decisions down the road. Obama and his administration is doing the same, instead choosing to play class warfare. I believe the issue will require dramatic spending cuts and unfortunately tax increases. But something must be done!!!!

Posted by: william smith | February 13, 2012, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Definition of Entitlement:
1.An entitlement is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation.

2. an unrealistic, exaggerated, or rigidly held sense of entitlement may be considered a symptom of narcissistic personality disorder.

Social Security and Medicare is more than just an entitlement. It is bought and paid for by every person that ever earned a paycheck.

Check your dictionary people!

Posted by: Amy Patrick | February 14, 2012, 11:18 am 11:18 am

ABC, please get Mr. Lew to answer: How long can our nation sustain this deficit spending with a weak dollar? When does the house of cards fall? Given, even with proposed tax increases, projection is for over 1.3-”T”rillion dollars of borrowing, how is this good? Why is it so hard to get a trajectory to a balanced budget like GB-senior provided BC? (Oh, right, “no new taxes” violation, for which he was gleefully flogged by our media leaders. Fortunately, BC went with the flow, and did go w/ the Rep’s on Welfare reform. BC was good on fiscal policy). And, how does the State Department get a budget increase when all other departments get cuts? Do we now think we can bribe our way to national security? And, what about those Tzars, can we cut their budgets? As mentioned before, comprehensive tax reform, any chance? Bohls-Simpson template? Paul Ryan plan?

Posted by: Joe | February 15, 2012, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.