Transcript for Nikki Haley addresses UN in wake of 'taking names' warning
To its shame the United Nations has long been a hostile place for the State of Israel. Both the current and previous secretary generals have objected to the UN's disproportionate. Focus on Israel. It's a wrong that undermines the credibility of this institution. And that in turn is harmful for the entire world. I've often wondered why in the face of such hostility. Israel has chosen to remain. A member of this body. And then I remember that Israel has chosen to remain in this institution. Because it's important. To stand up for yourself. Is Euro must stand up for its own survival as a nation. But it also stands up for the ideals. Of freedom and human dignity that the United Nations is supposed to be about. Standing here today being forced to defend sovereignty and the integrity of my country the United States of America. Many of the same thoughts have come to mind. The United States is by far the single largest contributor to the United Nations and its agencies. We do this in part in order to advance our values and our interests. When that happens our participation in the UN produces great good for the world. Together we seat closed and educate desperate people. We nurture and sustain fragile peace in conflict areas throughout the world. And we hold outlaw regimes accountable. We do this because it represents who we are it is our American way. But will be honest with you. When we make generous contributions to the UN. We also have a legitimate expectation that our goodwill. Is recognized. And respected. When a nation is singled out for attack in this organization. That nation is disrespecting. What's more that nation is asked to pay for the privilege. Of being disrespect. In the case of the United States we are asked to pay more than anyone else for that dubious privilege. Unlike in some UN member countries the United States government is answerable to its people. As such we have an obligation to aid knowledge when our political and financial capital is being poorly spent. We have an obligation to demand more for our investment. And if our investment fails. We have an obligation. To spend our resources. And more productive ways. Those are the thoughts that come to mind when we consider the resolution before us today. The arguments about the president's decision to move the American Embassy to Jerusalem. Have already been made. They are by now well now. The decision was in accordance to US law dating back to 1990 fat. And its position has been repeatedly endorsed by the American people ever cents. The decision does not pre judge any final status issues including Jerusalem's boundaries. The decision does not preclude a two state solution if you parties agree to that. The decision does nothing. To harm peace efforts. Rather the president's decision reflects the will of the American people and our rights as a nation. To choose the location. Of our embassy. There is no need to describe it further. Instead. There's a larger point to make. The United States will remember this day in which it was singled out. For attacked in the general assembly for the very act of exercising our right as a sovereign nation. We will remember it when we are called upon to once again make the world's largest contribution. To the United Nations. And we will remember. When so many countries come calling on us as they so often do. To pay even more and to use our influence for their benefit. America will put our embassy in Jerusalem that is what the American people want us to do and it is the right thing to do. No vote in the United Nations will make any difference on that. But this there will make a difference on how Americans look at the UN. And on how we look at countries who disrespect us in the UN. And this vote will be remembered. Thank you.
This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.